Transcript
Charlie Kirk (0:00)
Hey, everybody, Charlie Kirk here. Live from the Bitcoin.com studio, we have William J. Kelly from Chicago. And Steve Dase leads off all about rejecting the prism, Israel, Gaza, Christianity, economics and more. Email us. As always, freedomarliekirk.com get involved in America's most important organization, Turning Point USA@tpusa.com, that is tpusa.com Buckle up, everybody. Here we go. Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.
Steve Dase (0:26)
Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus. I want you to know we are.
Charlie Kirk (0:29)
Lucky to have Charlie Kirk.
Steve Dase (0:32)
Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.
William J. Kelly (0:35)
I want to thank Charlie. He's an incredible guy, his spirit, his love of this country. He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point usa.
Charlie Kirk (0:45)
We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country. That's why we are here. Whenever I want to get some clarity when there's murkiness, I either text or invite Steve Dase on the program. He's a very clear thinker and someone that I deeply appreciate when we're in the midst of confusing times. Steve Dace is with Blaze tv, host of the Steve Dase show, and you can follow him on X. Steve Dase show and also a movie producer of Nefarious. Steve, great to see you, my friend. Steve, I want you to comment on something that I know you've been riffing on, which is this problem of false choices. It seems as if we're constantly caught in the prism of false choices of the left. They want us to be in this prison of binary false choices. Life does not work that way. And far too often we are trapped in that rhetorically and politically. Can you expand on this argument? I think it's very deep. Or, and by the way, we saw this with the Iran thing. Either you're a Ron Paul isolationist or you're a Wolfowitz neoconservative. It's not as if there was a third or fourth or fifth or sixth option. I feel as if this might be part of an information war tactic to try and divide and splinter and schism the conservative movement.
Steve Dase (2:05)
Steve days, I 100% agree. I think the term that you just defined for us is psyops. What are they? And a great way, Charlie, to debunk those. And sometimes it's referred to the Socratic method. But you see, our Lord used this in the New Testament a lot, the asking of questions in order to expose false Choices. Where's your power to forgive sins from? Well, I mean, I'll, I'll reveal that if you tell me it was, you know, where did John the Baptist get the power to baptize from? Right. The, the, the response of a question with a question so that you can find out is the person that is raising the point even if you vehemently disagree with it, are they act, are they good faith actor or not? Charlie. Or is this in order to cover up what their real argument is? You know, for example, during the Obama years we had more people on food stamps than the total population of Spain. Much of his presidency. And I always wondered at the time, why aren't we celebrating this? I mean, why aren't we having press conferences in the Rose Garden? Why aren't we, I mean, if welfare state equals compassion according to their own messaging over there, then we should be holding press releases. There should be, you know, presidential press gaggles and avails congratulating the American people for the record amount of compassion they are demonstrating through the food stamp program. And notice, we did not have that right. And it's because ultimately those, those lines are tropes. They're scams and they're lies. But you need to ask the right questions in order to flesh that out. For example, why would it, why would Democrats be hindered so much in the next midterm election if we didn't count illegal aliens? And one of the things I love to add to that is we use this phrase on our show a lot, which is what's the benign, innocent explanation for that? What would be the benign and innocent explanation for why Democrats keep telling us that if we don't count illegal aliens in the census, they're going to lose seats. What's a benign and is an explanation for that? There often isn't one. And you know, you can do this on things like pro life too, which is, tell you what, you know, listen, I'm a, I'm a life begins at conception and it ought to be 100% banned guy that thinks personhood is granted in the 5th and 14th Amendments of the U.S. constitution. But you know, I'll, I'll prove your point. I'll show your level of superior empathy for women that are sadly succumb to, to rape and incest, which is how some of the kids in my own family line were conceived, frankly. But I, I will grant you that premise. And how about this then? We'll ban all abortions unless, unless there is a case where someone has filed a rape charge. And then they're permitted to do one. Do you think, Charlie, the, the, the baby killing movement would grant us that if we made that the compromise to them, Not a single one of them would vote for.
