Podcast Summary: The Charlie Kirk Show - THOUGHTCRIME Ep. 63

Release Date: November 23, 2024
Host: Charlie Kirk
Guests: Tyler Boyer, Jack Posobiec, Blake Neff

1. Matt Gaetz’s Future and Resignation Process

Discussion Highlights: The episode opens with a discussion about Congressman Matt Gaetz's surprising resignation. The panel delves into the implications of his resignation from the current Congress and the potential pathways for his political future.

Notable Quotes:

• Charlie Kirk [36:10]: "Yes. If Matt Gaetz wishes he could, he can easily resume the next Congress."
• Blake Neff [36:13]: "So he doesn't."
• Jack Posobiec [36:37]: "Blake, does that resignation count for the seat that or the Session that he was just elected for?"

Key Points:

• Gaetz's resignation from the current term potentially forfeits his position in the next Congress.
• Discussion on whether Governor DeSantis might intervene to cancel the special election, allowing Gaetz to resume his seat.
• Speculation about Gaetz's ambitions, including a possible run for governor, and the likelihood of his return to Congress being obstructed.

2. Challenges in Confirming Trump’s Attorney General Nominees

Discussion Highlights: The conversation transitions to the rocky process of confirming Trump's nominees for the position of Attorney General (AG). The panel discusses the withdrawal of Matt Gaetz's nomination and explores potential replacements.

Notable Quotes:

• Blake Neff [03:27]: "Matt Gaetz withdrew his nomination for Attorney General... tied for the third shortest cabinet nomination in history."
• Jack Posobiec [05:07]: "When Matt Gaetz's name came out, I said, wow... But we knew that we could lose three."
• Charlie Kirk [08:24]: "The deputy Attorney general that has been nominated, Todd Blanche, is terrific."

Key Points:

• Matt Gaetz's nomination for AG was unexpectedly withdrawn, marking one of the shortest cabinet nominations.
• Potential nominees include Todd Blanche, who has shown loyalty to Trump by leaving a prestigious law firm to represent him.
• Discussion on the politicized nature of confirmations, with Senate dynamics making it difficult to secure unanimous support.
• Introduction of Turning Point Action's initiative to educate the public on Republican senators who have voted for Biden’s appointments, urging them to hold these senators accountable.

3. Grassroots Efforts and Senate Accountability

Discussion Highlights: Charlie Kirk emphasizes the importance of grassroots mobilization to influence Senate votes on confirmations. The panel discusses Turning Point Action's "NoExcuse" campaign aimed at highlighting Republican senators who support Democratic nominees.

Notable Quotes:

• Tyler Boyer [11:37]: "We're going to be directly lobbying people from senators... holding these senators accountable."
• Jack Posobiec [14:33]: "Why is it that so many of these red state senators are willing to vote for Joe Biden's nominees, but they drag their feet for Donald Trump's nominees?"

Key Points:

• Introduction of the "NoExcuse" campaign to expose and mobilize against Republican senators backing Democratic appointments.
• Targeting senators from conservative states who have supported nominees like Merrick Garland and Alejandro Mayorkas.
• The initiative aims to leverage public pressure through emails, calls, and social media to ensure Senate accountability.
• Discussion on the ideological conflicts within the Republican caucus, with some senators aligning more closely with Democratic principles despite party affiliation.

4. Evaluating Potential AG Nominees: Tulsi Gabbard vs. Bobby Tulsi vs. RFK Jr.

Discussion Highlights: The panel debates which nominee for AG will face the toughest confirmation hearings, considering factors like political alliances, personal backgrounds, and potential opposition from establishment figures.

Notable Quotes:

• Blake Neff [17:54]: "RFK is going to be the toughest one, even though it doesn't make a ton of sense to me."
• Jack Posobiec [19:42]: "I honestly think it's going to be Tulsi because the Tulsi fight has already begun."
• Charlie Kirk [22:05]: "Tulsi Gabbard is going to be the biggest fight... She's going to be someone that's going to break... reach out to independent, she's going to reach out to women."

Key Points:

• Bobby Tulsi: Seen as a formidable candidate due to potential attacks on her past as a Democrat and her stances on foreign policy, particularly regarding Russia and Ukraine.
• RFK Jr.: Considered the toughest nominee because of the extensive opposition from major industries and the possibility of aggressive legal and personal attacks.
• Tulsi Gabbard: While viewed as challenging due to her military background and outspoken positions, there's optimism about her ability to garner support beyond the traditional MAGA base.

Conclusion: Charlie Kirk expresses confidence that Tulsi Gabbard will face the most significant opposition during her confirmation but believes she can overcome these challenges with grassroots support.

5. Blue Sky Social Platform Analysis

Discussion Highlights: The panel explores the rise of Blue Sky as an alternative to Twitter, critiquing its similarities to the established platform and questioning its effectiveness in fostering free speech.

Notable Quotes:

• Blake Neff [40:05]: "Blue sky just looks exactly like Twitter... It uses the exact same logo, except it's a butterfly instead of a bird."
• Jack Posobiec [43:24]: "There have been some really funny anons going over and brigading Blue sky... it's been absolutely hilarious."

Key Points:

• Blue Sky mirrors Twitter in design and functionality but is perceived as catering to users dissatisfied with Twitter's moderation policies.
• The platform attracts users seeking less censorship, but ironically, it still implements similar content moderation strategies.
• The panel humorously discusses the ideologies of users migrating to Blue Sky and the challenges in maintaining genuine free speech.

6. Jussie Smollett’s Case: Fake Hate Crime Allegation

Discussion Highlights: A significant portion of the episode is dedicated to dissecting the Jussie Smollett case, portraying it as a fabricated hate crime and critiquing the legal proceedings and public perception.

Notable Quotes:

• Blake Neff [35:44]: "Jussie Smollett was attacked by guys wearing MAGA hats who said, this is MAGA country."
• Charlie Kirk [48:21]: "If we've got the concept of a hate crime exists, what is more fitting than you make up a completely insane, salacious allegation against a group of people to encourage hatred of them."
• Charlie Kirk [50:08]: "This is so good... I knew this was fake as soon as... negative 10 degree weather... no one is gallivanting around, you know..."

Key Points:

• The panel argues that Smollett's alleged hate crime was staged as a misguided attempt to gain career traction.
• Criticism of the Illinois justice system for its handling of the case, highlighting perceived leniency and procedural inconsistencies.
• Emphasis on the dangers of fabricated hate crimes in fueling societal hatred and division.
• Highlighting the lack of accountability and the need for stricter penalties for false hate crime reports.

Conclusion: Charlie Kirk underscores the societal harm caused by false hate crime allegations, advocating for harsher punishments to deter such actions and protect marginalized communities from fabricated narratives.

7. War Fever with Russia: Escalation Risks and Missile Technology

Discussion Highlights: The panel discusses the escalating tensions between the U.S. and Russia, focusing on Russia's development and deployment of hypersonic missiles and the potential for World War III.

Notable Quotes:

• Tyler Boyer [57:56]: "Russia is trying to escalate real quickly, this is their last chance at World War Three."
• Blake Neff [59:02]: "People are questioning the rationality of both sides... It's the deranged warmongers."
• Jack Posobiec [64:02]: "It's completely nuts... hypersonic missiles... Putin gave this operational test."

Key Points:

• Russia's testing and deployment of hypersonic missiles pose a significant threat to global stability and could trigger broader conflict.
• The U.S. is grappling with the technological advancements of Russian missile capabilities, drawing parallels to historical precedents like the Space Race.
• Concerns about hardliners within Russia pushing for aggressive expansion in Ukraine, potentially leading to unchecked military actions.
• The panel emphasizes the need for strategic diplomacy and technological countermeasures to prevent escalation into a large-scale war.

Conclusion: The panel expresses deep concern over Russia's military advancements and the potential for miscalculation leading to World War III. They advocate for robust U.S. defense strategies and diplomatic efforts to de-escalate tensions and ensure national and global security.

Final Remarks

As the episode wraps up, the panel reiterates the importance of vigilance against subversion within political structures and the necessity of maintaining momentum in advancing conservative agendas. They encourage listeners to stay informed, engage in grassroots activism, and hold elected officials accountable to preserve the gains of the past election cycle.

Notable Quotes:

• Jack Posobiec [55:50]: "Don't sit there for a second and tell me that, oh, we can just bring in anybody off the street who spent enough time in Washington."
• Charlie Kirk [70:00]: "Thanks so much for listening, everybody. Email us, as always, freedom@charliekirk.com."

Additional Information:

• Subscribe and Engage: Listeners are encouraged to subscribe to the podcast, join memberships at members.charliekirk.com, and attend America Fest via amfest.com.
• Support Hosts: The panel promotes their presence on Rumble and other social media platforms for continued updates and activism efforts.

This summary encapsulates the key discussions and viewpoints expressed during the episode, providing insight into the panel's perspectives on political confirmations, media dynamics, high-profile legal cases, and international conflicts. Notable quotes serve to highlight the speakers' emphatic stances and underscore the episode's central themes.