The Charlie Kirk Show: THOUGHTCRIME Ep. 76 — Cannibal Democrats? Subscription Services? VR Prisons?
Release Date: March 15, 2025
Host: Charlie Kirk
Guests: Buck Sexton, Blake
Duration: Approximately 81 minutes
I. Swatting of Conservative Influencers
The episode opens with Charlie Kirk addressing the alarming trend of swatting incidents targeting conservative influencers. Swatting, the malicious act of making false reports to emergency services to provoke a police response, has seen a surge against figures associated with conservative politics.
Discussion Highlights:
-
Recent Incidents: Blake brings up recent swatting cases targeting individuals like Chase Geithner from Infowars and Sean Farash. He references a case where perpetrators, originally foreign nationals from Romania and Serbia, were extradited to the U.S. for their actions, emphasizing the severity and cross-border nature of these crimes.
Blake [01:49]: "...they got these two guys, a guy from Romania and a guy from Serbia, their list of code names that they used for communication. They charged them with conspiracy... 20 counts of threats..."
-
Potential Consequences: The hosts discuss the potential for swatting to escalate into fatal outcomes, especially when police respond with armored vehicles and high-tension tactics. Blake recounts his personal experience of a threatening swatting attempt, highlighting the real dangers involved.
Charlie Kirk [07:14]: "I completely agree. And that's what it is. It is attempted murder. Tyler."
-
Solutions and Prevention: The conversation shifts to preventive measures, such as building strong relationships with local law enforcement and utilizing real-time monitoring services to detect and prevent doxing and swatting attempts.
Blake [05:55]: "...look into it yourself where you can go and get it. And then sometimes, like, if it gets leaked somehow... it's not that much money actually..."
-
Federal Involvement: The need for a federal crackdown is stressed, with suggestions to prosecute swatters under severe charges like attempted murder to deter future incidents.
Blake [07:02]: "...if you catch someone doing this and you say your goal was to have someone get shot by police. We are charging you with attempted murder. Enjoy. 40 years in prison."
Notable Quotes:
- Jack [07:02]: "Oh, Nick." (Segueing into the discussion on federal charges)
- Charlie Kirk [11:03]: "This is sick stuff."
- Blake [11:55]: "...there are services out there..."
II. Cannibal Democrats Controversy
The conversation takes a dark turn as the hosts delve into a shocking story from the town of Lynwood, Washington. They discuss the controversial appointment of Jessica Ann Roberts to the city council, whose past reveals disturbing ties to cannibalism.
Discussion Highlights:
-
The Case of Jessica Ann Roberts: Jessica, formerly known as Neil Vincent Roberts, was appointed to the Lynwood city council amidst revelations of a cannibalistic fetish. The hosts critique the city council's oversight in failing to conduct a thorough background check before the appointment.
Blake [12:10]: "Millennial here. Breaking Washington Trans Only Fans. City Council Appointee Rescinds Candidacy After Cannibal Fetish Controversy..."
-
Reddit Exposure: The scandal emerged through posts on a Reddit community named “Vogue/Vore,” where Jessica expressed explicit cannibalistic desires. The hosts condemn such online communities and call for stricter regulation.
Blake [14:38]: "...they found all the posts this guy was making on a subreddit, which we really need to, like, quarantine Reddit in some capacity."
-
Mental Health Concerns: There's a discussion on the possible mental instability of individuals with such extreme fetishes and the importance of recognizing warning signs to prevent such appointments in public offices.
Blake [16:14]: "What could have given away. Nah, there must not have been anything."
-
Political Lens: The hosts argue that leftist politics inadvertently promote extreme and taboo behaviors by incentivizing individuals to push societal boundaries, leading to bizarre and harmful actions like cannibalism.
Jack [21:11]: "...in leftist politics, these types of things are inseparable."
Notable Quotes:
- Charlie Kirk [13:50]: "This is disgusting."
- Charlie Kirk [22:42]: "Are all cannibals transgender?"
- Blake [22:37]: "It's gotta be higher [in the transgender community]."
III. Virtual Reality Prisons
Shifting the topic from real-world dangers to incarceration methods, the hosts explore the emerging concept of Virtual Reality (VR) prisons. They examine the potential benefits and ethical dilemmas associated with this innovative approach to rehabilitation.
Discussion Highlights:
-
Implementation in California: Reports from Central California Women's Facility indicate that inmates have been granted access to VR gear, allowing them to experience virtual environments outside the prison walls. This initiative has reportedly led to a 96% decrease in inmate offenses.
Blake [28:28]: "...there are reports now they have prisons where they're giving inmates access to virtual reality gear..."
-
Rehabilitation vs. Punishment: The hosts debate whether the primary purpose of prisons should be punishment or rehabilitation. VR prisons are presented as a potential tool for the latter, offering inmates engaging activities that could reduce recidivism.
Blake [32:48]: "Those kids probably not... but it might be really wrong to use VR to torture people."
-
Ethical Considerations: Concerns arise about the possibility of using VR for punitive measures rather than rehabilitative ones. Suggestions include forcing mentally ill individuals into VR scenarios as a form of control, which the hosts vehemently oppose.
Blake [37:06]: "I feel like if someone has done a crime where you think that's worth doing to them, you should just snip, snip."
-
Technological Feasibility: The hosts discuss the current state of VR technology, acknowledging its limitations but also its potential for future applications in the justice system.
Blake [36:53]: "It's going to be a bigger and bigger question because the tech for this is only going to get better..."
Notable Quotes:
- Charlie Kirk [33:03]: "Yeah, I mean, so if it's all about protection, prison is such a joke."
- Blake [35:40]: "I've never used a VR headset for... but it feels like this is probably one of the best use cases for it."
- Charlie Kirk [40:32]: "I will personally lobby the president to keep it lighter later."
IV. Critique of Reality TV: Love is Blind
The hosts turn their attention to the popular reality TV show "Love is Blind," critiquing its format and implications on societal norms and personal relationships.
Discussion Highlights:
-
Format and Mechanics: "Love is Blind" involves participants interacting solely through voice without seeing each other, deciding to marry based on conversations alone. The hosts mock the superficiality and potential for mismatched unions inherent in such a format.
Buck Sexton [45:06]: "And so they have to pick a match based off of their conversations."
-
Viral Clip Analysis: A particularly viral clip showcases a seemingly incompatible couple agreeing to marry without seeing each other, highlighting the flawed premise of the show.
Charlie Kirk [55:33]: "So let me understand. So in this clip, before we get into the clip, these two people invited their entire families on camera..."
-
Psychological Implications: The discussion delves into how such shows may encourage individuals to prioritize verbal connection over physical attraction, potentially leading to unstable marriages and distorted views on relationships.
Jack [57:23]: "...the fried mental model that are like over-socialized. People are way too invested in politics, into their personal lives."
-
Cultural Criticism: The hosts argue that reality TV like "Love is Blind" reflects a broader trend of over-politicization and superficiality in media, detracting from meaningful personal connections and societal values.
Jack [59:11]: "In a stable society, you know, people are just kind of going about their lives, and you're not going to be mixing politics with, like, a dating show."
Notable Quotes:
- Blake [43:07]: "We can't say more about it, but we should find that guy who was at University of Tennessee today."
- Charlie Kirk [45:25]: "And so what happens if she's like a horse?"
- Jack [59:15]: "Like the original dating shows were so much more, like, fluffy and just fun and stupid."
V. The State of Video Games and Subscription Services
The conversation shifts to the realm of video games, examining current trends, popular titles, and the proliferation of subscription-based services.
Discussion Highlights:
-
Popular Games in 2025: The hosts list and discuss enduringly popular games such as Call of Duty, Madden, Minecraft, and Grand Theft Auto V. They observe that despite technological advancements, many games rely on familiar franchises and lack originality.
Charlie Kirk [70:35]: "The most popular games of 2025, Call of Duty, I had that and then I grew up..."
-
Subscription Fatigue: Blake and Buck express skepticism towards the multitude of subscription services, criticizing their financial burden and questioning their value compared to standalone purchases.
Charlie Kirk [53:05]: "I have all of these. I'm like, I am."
-
VR Integration: The potential for VR in gaming is explored, with discussions on its current limitations and future possibilities. The hosts share mixed opinions on the immersive experience VR offers versus its practicality and current technological shortcomings.
Blake [35:40]: "...there's something fundamentally off about, like, being totally dead to the world that way."
-
Nostalgia vs. Innovation: There's a nostalgic appreciation for classic games and franchises, contrasted with frustration over the lack of innovation in newer titles. The conversation touches on how economic factors, such as high development costs, stifle creativity in game design.
Blake [71:50]: "What makes it popular is like, you can be like any character in it at this point."
Notable Quotes:
- Blake [65:11]: "You play more video games than I watch TV. Which is worse?"
- Buck Sexton [65:28]: "Call of Duty is still around."
- Charlie Kirk [73:21]: "It was just like Capture the Flag."
VI. Daylight Savings Time Debate
In the final segment, the hosts engage in a heated debate over the implementation and impacts of Daylight Savings Time (DST). They discuss its effects on daily routines, productivity, and overall well-being.
Discussion Highlights:
-
Personal Experiences: Charlie Kirk advocates for keeping Arizona on Pacific Time without DST adjustments, citing increased efficiency and better alignment with work schedules compared to Eastern Time.
Charlie Kirk [75:31]: "I love being three hours behind. I see all the news of the day. I'm processing..."
-
Disruption of Circadian Rhythms: Blake and Buck argue that changing clocks disrupts natural sleep patterns, leading to reduced productivity and increased stress.
Blake [78:26]: "Daily Savings Time was invented by Democrats."
-
Cultural and Religious Perspectives: Blake introduces a religious angle, suggesting that DST goes against Christian traditions that emphasize the sanctity of the natural day-night cycle.
Blake [78:26]: "...we rebel against God, and that is the sin of pride."
-
Practical Implications: The hosts discuss the practical benefits of DST, such as extended evening sunlight for family time and outdoor activities, juxtaposed with the inconvenience of adjusting schedules twice a year.
Charlie Kirk [75:29]: "I love being three hours... have a couple of hours to get all my thoughts organized."
-
Advocacy for Change: The episode concludes with Charlie Kirk expressing intent to lobby against DST, emphasizing the perceived benefits of maintaining a consistent time schedule year-round.
Charlie Kirk [80:44]: "I will personally lobby the president to keep it lighter later."
Notable Quotes:
- Blake [79:05]: "Morning sun is when God was telling us..."
- Charlie Kirk [75:49]: "But what if you had to wake up at 4am Charlie..."
- Buck Sexton [80:57]: "Yeah, and Charlie's right. You feel different."
Conclusion
In this episode of The Charlie Kirk Show, the hosts tackle a range of provocative and controversial topics. From the dangerous rise of swatting against conservative figures to the bizarre appointment of a cannibalistic city council member, they highlight threats facing the conservative movement. The discussion on VR prisons offers a glimpse into potential future incarceration methods, balancing rehabilitation with ethical concerns. A sharp critique of reality TV, particularly "Love is Blind," underscores perceived societal degeneracy, while the conversation on video games and subscription services reflects frustration with stagnant innovation and financial burdens. Finally, the debate on Daylight Savings Time encapsulates the show's broader themes of questioning and challenging established norms. Throughout the episode, Kirk and his guests employ a no-holds-barred, unapologetically conservative perspective, urging listeners to remain vigilant against threats to freedom and societal stability.
Notable Overall Quotes:
- Charlie Kirk [27:30]: "In the Christian tradition, we believe the body is sacred..."
- Blake [21:55]: "...you are going to have a bunch of valiums and muscle relaxers."
- Jack [57:27]: "We need to bring asylums back..."
Key Takeaways
- Swatting remains a serious threat: Particularly against conservative influencers, necessitating federal intervention and stronger preventive measures.
- Oversight in public appointments: The Jessica Ann Roberts case underscores the importance of thorough background checks to prevent individuals with dangerous tendencies from holding public office.
- VR in prisons holds potential but poses ethical dilemmas: While it may aid in rehabilitation, its use must be carefully regulated to avoid punitive abuses.
- Reality TV can reflect and influence societal values negatively: Shows like "Love is Blind" may promote superficial relationships and over-politicization.
- Video game industry stagnation and subscription fatigue: A call for more innovation and less reliance on existing franchises and financial-straining subscription models.
- Daylight Savings Time disrupts daily life: Maintaining a consistent time schedule could enhance productivity and align better with natural rhythms.
This episode serves as a comprehensive exploration of contemporary issues through a conservative lens, urging listeners to critically evaluate societal trends and advocate for policies that align with their values.
