Rick Santelli (11:19)

Ultimately, if you live in the US or you live in Europe or you live in China, ultimately what goes on at home is very important.

Oren Cassidy (11:27)

We are the most dynamic economy in the world.

Rick Santelli (11:30)

And much of that, and much of that money we spent was in debt. The debt was financed by foreigners. Some of that they enabled us, just like the Fed enabled us with those capital accounts. I'm saying there is a dark side to the trade deficits in a different way, I think, than Trump looks at it. I look at it like it does. It does underscore and underpin a type of financial behavior that in the long term hurts.

Charlie Kirk (11:57)

That financial behavior that Rick Santelli is pinpointing beautifully is that we will import piles of plastic that we do not need. We will no longer make stuff here. And regardless of the consequences to our own citizenry, we will continue to trade paper for stuff. Paper for stuff. You see, the one advantage that we have is that when a trade war escalates is that traditionally the country that is in the trade Deficit will almost always win the trade war because we have far more cards than the country that is in the trade surplus. So China is actually very reliant on us right now. So much of their material wealth has been built on trading with us and we have not decided to do anything about it. And also understand it is easy and quite honestly intellectually lazy to blame Donald Trump for this, blame the people that created the mess. He is attempting to fix it. And it's going to take a Herculean effort to go through the fact that a lot of people are losing money right now. And I am not diminishing that, I am not minimizing it. A lot of people are losing 10, 15% of their earnings. I believe they will get it back and then some because of the tax cuts, the deregulation, the drill baby drill, the no tax on tips. The tax bill is going to boost the psyche and the mentality and you have to look long term. But he is attempting to fix the inherited, broken global trade order. We have sold our wealth away and we're starting to see a reinvestment of foreign direct investment of building and manufacturing well over $5 trillion that is going to be spent in this country. And remember when Ronald Reagan was president, there was a short term economic dip before the massive roaring 1980s. This is Stephen Miller on Laura Ingraham play cut 366.

Stephen Miller (14:14)

All of that manufacturing, all of that industry was ripped apart by our elites, shipped to foreign countries. And then they sent us the bill. They said, you have to protect Korea, you have to protect Europe, you have to protect Canada, you have to protect Japan. We won't take your cars, we won't take your agriculture, we'll take away your steel industry, your aluminum industry, your copper industry, your electronics industry. So what President Trump is saying is these are the injustices you have to remedy. This isn't just about moving around some lines on a ledger. This is about remedying the systemic injustice that says the streets of America are filled with European cars and, and Japanese cars, but the streets of Europe and Japan have no American cars. This is about saying that the American steel industry, which once built and sustained.

Charlie Kirk (14:58)

The modern world, this is another important point. I think at its core, a lot of Americans appreciate certain forms of trade and importation. If your country is full of great artisans and craftsmen and you're importing something that is incredibly unique, something that that nation is known for, for example, Colombian coffee, fair enough. Or Canadian maple syrup, French wine is a great example. The tariffs are not targeted towards that. I mean, they might be caught up in that. But the essence of the tariffs is not trying to go after Italian olive oil. It's not trying to destroy the native cultural export of a certain nation. No, instead, what we have a problem with is trading. When a nation becomes an industrial mill of unnecessary piles of plastic, unnecessary amount of garbage that then floods our streets, our communities, and we have no attachment with what we're actually buying, we become so hyper materialistic, we are not here to try and stop French wine from coming to the United States. In fact, though I will say the wine producers in Fredericksburg, Texas and Napa Valley would love that. Instead, we want American products, the stuff that we're good at making, which is a couple things here or there to be able to go into other nations without penalty or tariff. Hey, everybody, Charlie Kirk here. The April 15 tax deadline is coming fast. Do you have an unfiled tax return? Can't pay the irs. The IRS is more aggressive than ever, and the longer you wait, the worse it gets. Wage garnishments, bank levies, even property seizures are on the table. You need to get ahead of this. But going up against the IRS alone is a mistake. Take my advice. Call the experts at Tax Network usa. They know the system and they have an edge. A preferred direct line to the irs. They know which agents to deal with and which ones to avoid whether you owe $10,000 or $10,000,000. Their genius strategies are designed to quickly settle your tax problems in your favor. Tax Network USA attorneys and negotiators have already resolved over $1 billion in tax debt. Tax Network USA can help you, too, but you need to move fast. April 15th is almost here. Talk with one of their strategists. Today. It's free. Stop looking over your shoulder and put this behind you. Call Tax Network USA at 1-800-958-1000. That is 1-800-958-10000 or visit tnusa.comcharlie. email us freedom charliekirk.com to help us make sense of the tariffs and the philosophy behind them is Oren Cassidy, the chief economist at the American Compass. Oren, great to see you. Oren, what is your take on President Trump's tariff announcements? But even more broadly, let's start with why are tariffs a good idea for the United States of America to implement?

Oren Cassidy (18:06)

Well, at the end of the day, I think tariffs are important because making things matters. I've found you have to start all the way back there because we've gone through, you know, 30 or 40 years where economists and Policymakers said making things doesn't matter. We're going to have a free trade system where we are perfectly happy. If all of our manufacturing jobs go to China, they'll make cheap stuff for us and we'll find something else to do. And what we've seen is that's a terrible model. It is terrible for working people who see good jobs leave and not so good jobs replace them. It's terrible for the economy. We've seen less innovation, lower growth, and it's certainly terrible for our national security. If you can't make stuff, you can't defend the country with bowling alleys. And so the entire argument for free trade and just saying you don't care where things get made, if that's not right, then in fact, you probably do need some sort of tariff. You need a finger on the scale that says, all things equal, we would rather things be made here. And by having a tariff, you change prices a little bit so that people deciding where to build, where to make things will think harder about doing them here in America.

Charlie Kirk (19:18)

What do you have to say to critics that will say, well, tariffs are a tax and it will raise prices on everyday American middle class consumers?

Oren Cassidy (19:29)

Well, tariffs are a tax, but at the end of the day, you have to raise revenue from somewhere. So if you have more revenue coming in from a tariff, you can also reduce some other tax instead. You can also reduce our entire, you know, our enormous deficit if you want to. So I don't think we should choose, yes, we do want a tariff, or no, we don't, based on the fact that it's a tax. We should think about the goal that we have. And if the goal that we have is to encourage people to find ways to make things here, then we do want that to show up in prices. And what we've seen historically is that when you actually do this, the result is that people do come make stuff here. And once people invest here, they can make it very efficiently. I mean, look at Japanese cars. They all used to be imported from Japan. It was the Reagan administration that basically forced Japan to send Honda and Toyota to come build cars in America instead. No one's walking around complaining that Toyotas and Hondas are too expensive. We're happy that we have them investing here and hundreds of thousands of jobs as a result.

Charlie Kirk (20:31)

So the consensus of Wall street right now is that these tariffs will create a bitter, ongoing trade war of which there will be no resolution. Comment on the details of these tariffs, President Trump's strategy, and any feedback you might have.

Oren Cassidy (20:49)

Well, I Think it's important to notice that there are kind of three different tariffs that he's pursuing. One is China, and, you know, he has at this point come in and put very high tariffs on China. They're getting up toward 50 or 60%. He has also endorsed Trump, and this is a bipartisan partisan position at this point that we should revoke what's called permanent normal trade relations, that we should sort of permanently say we don't, we don't want free trade with China. China is an adversary. China is not a market economy. And so I would expect to see that trading relationship go downhill. And frankly, I think we should want it to go downhill. That, that doesn't concern me at all in terms of what the long term strategy is. The second piece is, is the kind of global 10% tariff. And that's the piece that I think fits the view that I was describing at the if we have a preference for making things in America, then we should want to have some sort of tariff that puts a finger on the scale. And if other countries want to do the same thing, I think we should say that's reasonable. Tariffs at that level will create some friction that I think we should want in the system that encourages domestic production. It's not going to, it's not going to ruin the global economy or whatever else. And then the third piece, which I think is the most complicated is what they're calling these reciprocal tariffs, where they went country by country, country and looked at how big a trade deficit do we have with the country, how big is the imbalance? And the bigger that imbalance is, the bigger the tariff we're going to put on you. And I think my interpretation is that that is clearly what I would call a negotiating tariff. What they're saying is, look, if we can get trade back to balance, we would love to get rid of these tariffs. We would love to have no extra tariff on you and have balanced trade with you. What we're not going to tolerate anymore is this situation where we have highly imbalanced trade. And I think what you'll see and what will be in the best interests of other countries is they would much rather work that out and have balanced trade than have a trade war that's better for them and it's better for us. And so what I hope we're moving toward and what the Trump administration is pushing toward is, look, we can have a big free trade zone of market democracies that all commit to balanced trade, that have very low tariffs and that keep China out, and that would be a much better economy for the United States, and I think it would be a very good arrangement for our allies as well.

Charlie Kirk (23:16)

So if President Trump decided to ignore this problem and do nothing, I'm curious what would actually end up happening, which is the further deindustrialization of America. You've been studying the Reagan years, and in order to get inflation under control, they sparked a recession. Tell us any parallels that we might see and the ensuing prosperity that happened.

Oren Cassidy (23:38)

Yeah, I think it's really interesting to look at how all the sort of, you know, what I call very serious people who spend their time pontificating about our politics, they usually say, oh, you know, our democracy is broken. Politicians don't make hard choices. They won't accept costs or ask people to make sacrifices to pursue the common good. And here you have the Trump administration doing exactly that. They're acknowledging that there are costs to this, but they are. They're saying it's worthwhile because we have very big challenges and it is going to take real effort to get out of them. And I think the last time we really did that was. Was when Ronald Reagan came into office. You know, we were at this. We were in this period of what was called stagflation. Inflation was very high, growth was very low. And what Reagan and the chair of the Federal Reserve, Paul Volcker, did was, was they. They shocked the economy. The interest rate went up to 20%, if you can imagine that. Unemployment went up to about 10%. The S&P 500 went down 40%. This was all early in Reagan's first term, and it took a long time to turn back around by 1984. On election day in 1984, the market was lower than it had been on election day in 1980, unemployment was still above 7%. And Reagan won probably, I believe, the biggest reelection landslide since George Washington. I mean, people. If you explain to people what the problem is, what it's going to take to solve it, and then you actually do what you say you're going to do, and you can show that you're on the right track. I think that's what the American people want, and it's what we should want from our leaders.

Charlie Kirk (25:14)

So the. What would you consider to be a good resolution with some of these negotiating tariffs? No tariffs at all. No boundaries or barriers. There's a debate right now of what does success look like because some of these tariffs are so extremely high. Is that going to be the new normal in your estimation for the American worker? What would be the best resolution there?

Oren Cassidy (25:38)

So I think the best resolution is that we get to balanced trade. And what that means is that trade is working the way it's supposed to, the way that we have sold it to workers all along. Right. When you hear politicians or economists tell people we should have free trade, what do they say? We're going to have better opportunities for better American jobs making more things for the rest of the world. We're going to specialize in the things we can make best. Other places will specialize in the things they can make best. That all sounds great. I would love for that to be the case. That's not what we got. Instead, we got a world where we stopped making things and those jobs in those factories moved to overseas. The rest of the world made stuff for us, but we didn't get to trade that for stuff that we made for the rest of the world. And that's not some weird fluke or magical effect. That's. It's really because of policies that other countries choose, policies that they are pursuing because they want to make things. They know that making things matters, and they want to sell them into the American market. And so what I'd like to see us do is use these tariffs, the reciprocal tariffs, for negotiations to make it very clear that kind of arrangement that was not good for Americans is no longer an option. If countries try to pursue that, they are going to see real consequences. But there is another way that would be better for them and it would be better for us. And it would look like them changing their policies. Instead of pursuing policies to try to take advantage of the US to try to take the jobs into their countries to grow by exporting into our country and not buying anything from us. What they should be doing is asking, what are the policies we can pursue that create balanced trade? Maybe that's like in the case of Japan, we're actually going to tell some of our companies and create policies that lead them to go invest more in America. Maybe it's going to be they pursue policies to buy a lot more from America. There's a lot they can do if. If we make it so that's what they want to do. And I think that should be the goal.

Charlie Kirk (27:41)

Hey, Charlie, Kirk here. Ever see your dog slowing down or having health issues and wonder, what can I do to make them better? Well, my friend, add rough greens to your dog's food for 90 days and you'll see changes that will amaze you. Guaranteed. Invented by naturopathic doctor Dennis Black, Ruffgreens wants to invite you and give your pup the Ruffgreens 90 Day Challenge. In the first 30 days, you'll see shinier coats and increased energy. By day 60, your dog will have a stronger immune system, less shedding and improved joint function, all due to live nutrients you've added to their diet. And at 90 days, better digestion, reduced inflammation, improved heart health, and you might even have reduced their cancer risk. Fetch a free Jump Start trial bag for your dog today. Go to ruffgreens.com just use promo code charlie that is ruffgreens.com promo code charlie. And just cover shipping. You don't have to change your dog's food to improve your dog's health. Just add a scoop of Ruffgreens that is ruffgreens.com so Oren, how many weeks of labor a year does it require a father or a dad in order to sustain a family of four? In 2025.

Oren Cassidy (28:53)

So my best estimate, and actually we looked at this kind of before you got the biggest Covid inflation because that obviously threw things off in a lot of ways. But if you take the kind of core basics of middle class security, which I would define as health insurance, housing, sort of typical average housing, transportation, operating a car, being able to pay for tuition at a public university in your state, and affording the food that your family needs, and if you ask, how many weeks of work for the typical male worker does that take in modern America now? It's well above 52. It's well above 60, in fact, which is a problem there obviously only being 52 weeks in a year. And it didn't used to be that way. If you go back and look at the 1980s, the sort of comparable package of stuff that you needed for middle class security, you could buy with about 40 weeks of work.

Charlie Kirk (29:48)

And in order for us to be able to restore that balance, what is required from an economic policy perspective beyond tariffs, what else would you be recommending for this administration to embrace?

Oren Cassidy (30:03)

Well, I think for one thing, it's really important to focus on what I would call the supply side. So, you know, tariffs obviously create an incentive to come and build more here in the United States. We also do a lot more to then help people do that. And some of that is things like better tax policy. We need to do deregulation. We also need a lot of workforce training. I think education is one of the most important places that we can be doing a lot better. Right now we have a model that sort of just says, look, we're going to try to get you into college and we hope that works. For you, but that's pretty much all we do. And the reality is that that does not work for the vast majority of people. Either they don't go to college at all, or they don't complete college, or even if they do a large share, can't find a job. That's the kind of job that is typically for people with a college degree. I think what we need is to invest much more heavily in other pathways that actually connect people to jobs that help cover the cost of their training, that put them into community college programs, that actually give them real skills. And obviously that's going to be very good for them, that's going to ensure that those younger workers are getting pretty quickly to a place where, where they feel like they can start a family. And it's going to be incredibly important for the employers, for these companies that we're asking, please come build here. You know, I'm not sure we can do that and then just say, but all we have, like, for you to hire are college dropouts and English majors. I think it will, it will speed along this transition if we have the right program so that we make sure we're preparing workers to be productive in this kind of economy.

Charlie Kirk (31:41)

Oren, in closing here, the trade, let's just say, situation has put a lot of our audience in a little bit place of anxiety. Any message to them of everyday retail investors that are quite worried about the effects of the application of tariffs.

Oren Cassidy (32:00)

Well, if you're talking about investments in the stock market, I think it's important to say that there is certainly a sort of adjustment going on here. I mean, everybody knows that globalization was very good for corporate profits. If the goal was to maximize corporate profits, then telling companies they could, you know, just shut down their, their American operations, they could stop dealing with American workers and they could just set up shop in China. There's no question that that drove a lot of profit and that drove a lot of appreciation in stock prices. And so if, if we're turning that around, if we're reversing that, we should expect that to have an effect on corporations. But just as it had a really negative effect on workers, I would expect this to have a much more positive effect on workers. And the reality is that if you look at the long term, it's not that whatever is good for corporations is good for America. It's that whatever is good for America is going to be good for corporations as well. And if we can get our house in order and actually have a more productive economy, a growing economy and a healthier nation and a healthier society. I think in the long run that's going to be plenty good for investors as well. But we really do have to focus on getting our ducks in order first.

Charlie Kirk (33:16)

Oren, thank you so much. Really appreciate it. Talk to you soon. Thank you.

Oren Cassidy (33:20)

My pleasure. Good to see you.

Charlie Kirk (33:21)

Thanks so much for listening everybody. Email us. As always, freedomarliekirk.com thanks so much for listening and God bless.

Rick Santelli (33:29)

For more on many of these stories.

Oren Cassidy (33:30)

And news you can Trust, go to charliekirk.com.