What's An Insurrection? What's "Pro-Russia?": Charlie and Vivek at Georgia State U.

Summary

Podcast Summary: "What's An Insurrection? What's 'Pro-Russia?': Charlie and Vivek at Georgia State U."

Release Date: December 6, 2024
Podcast: The Charlie Kirk Show
Host: Charlie Kirk
Location: Georgia State University

---

Introduction and Setting the Stage

In this engaging episode of The Charlie Kirk Show, host Charlie Kirk engages in a heated and in-depth discussion with Vivek—a conservative commentator—at Georgia State University. The conversation delves into pressing political issues, including foreign policy, media bias, the January 6th events, and immigration. The dialogue is marked by intense exchanges, differing viewpoints, and a commitment to conservative principles.

---

Foreign Policy: Trump vs. Biden on Warfare and Russian Relations

Key Discussion Points:

• Assessment of Presidential Policies:
  Charlie Kirk commends Donald Trump's foreign policy, particularly highlighting his administration's approach to Russia and Ukraine. He contrasts this with Joe Biden's tenure, asserting that Biden has escalated conflicts, especially in Ukraine and the Middle East.

• Russia-Ukraine Conflict:
  Kirk emphasizes that under Trump's leadership, Russia did not expand its territory, unlike under other presidents. He cites Trump's deterrence strategies, such as threatening to bomb Moscow if Russia invaded Ukraine, which he believes prevented further aggression.

• Abraham Accords:
  Charlie lauds Trump's achievement in brokering the Abraham Accords, which he claims brought stability to the Middle East by fostering peace agreements between Israel and several Arab nations.

Notable Quotes:

• Charlie Kirk (03:00): “What war did he [Trump] start?”
• Charlie Kirk (04:38): “We actually had a chance to have a peace deal five days into the war and it was the United States of America that came in and blew up the peace deal in Istanbul, Turkey.”
• Vivek (07:22): “What did Trump ever say do anything violent?”

---

Media Bias and Disinformation: The Battle for Truth

Key Discussion Points:

• Definition and Combatting Disinformation:
  The conversation shifts to the role of media in spreading disinformation. Melinda criticizes both CNN and Fox News for biased reporting, while Charlie defends the First Amendment, arguing that all speech, including hate and misinformation, should be protected.

• Censorship Concerns:
  The dialogue touches upon the dangers of media companies having the power to censor information. Charlie warns against granting any entity the authority to suppress opposing viewpoints, framing it as a pathway to totalitarianism.

• Hunter Biden Laptop and COVID-19 Origins:
  The hosts debate the legitimacy of information regarding Hunter Biden’s laptop and the origins of COVID-19, with Vivek asserting governmental censorship played a role in shaping public perception.

Notable Quotes:

• Melinda (13:17): “Getting rid of disinformation and also securing more hope in our system.”
• Charlie Kirk (19:25): “The first Amendment protects all speech, hate speech, disinformation, misinformation, and correct speech.”
• Vivek (15:43): “SARS COV2 is not. It was designed to spread more rapidly.”

---

January 6th Insurrection: Legality and Implications for Eligibility to Vote

Key Discussion Points:

• Definition of Insurrection:
  The hosts debate whether the events of January 6th constitute an insurrection. Charlie argues that without an armed rebellion to overthrow the government, it doesn't meet the legal definition of insurrection as per the 14th Amendment.

• Eligibility to Vote:
  They discuss Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, contemplating whether a candidate who attempted to overthrow the government should be eligible to appear on the ballot. Charlie maintains that since no legal charges for insurrection have been successfully brought, the term doesn't apply.

• Supreme Court’s Role:
  Vivek highlights the Supreme Court’s reluctance to pursue certain cases against Donald Trump, suggesting that political biases influence judicial outcomes.

Notable Quotes:

• Charlie Kirk (22:08): “The Constitution says no, but it wasn't an insurrection. No one's been tried for insurrection.”
• Vivek (22:18): “Section 3 of the 14th Amendment... that's why the arguments of birthright citizenship from the left often get distorted.”
• Charlie Kirk (25:56): “Obama killed a US Citizen without due process on foreign soil. That is a war crime.”

---

Immigration: Legal Frameworks vs. Humanitarian Concerns

Key Discussion Points:

• Distinguishing Legal from Illegal Immigration:
  The conversation addresses the complexity of immigration, emphasizing the need to enforce existing laws while also recognizing the contributions of lawful immigrants. They discuss scenarios involving families, birthright citizenship, and the 14th Amendment.

• Policy Recommendations:
  Vivek advocates for restoring the rule of law by deporting individuals who entered illegally, while allowing those who entered legally and contribute to society to remain. He stresses that birthright citizenship should not apply to children born to illegal immigrants.

• Humanitarian Perspectives:
  Reggie, an audience member, shares a personal story about his grandmother’s legal immigration, prompting a discussion on how to balance enforcement with compassion for immigrants who seek to build better lives.

Notable Quotes:

• Vivek (31:37): “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof shall be citizens... that’s why the arguments of birthright citizenship from the left often get distorted.”
• Charlie Kirk (30:50): “All should be deported back as a family. But again, okay, that's why I wouldn't win an election.”
• Vivek (34:18): “If your first act of entering this country broke the law, I think it is legitimate for the United States of America to treat you as a lawbreaker.”

---

Audience Interaction and Final Remarks

Throughout the episode, Charlie and Vivek engage actively with audience questions, reinforcing their conservative viewpoints and addressing concerns about media integrity, presidential accountability, and immigration policies. The hosts maintain a consistent emphasis on upholding constitutional principles, advocating for free speech, and critiquing what they perceive as liberal biases in media and governance.

Notable Quotes:

• Charlie Kirk (27:07): “When did he ever say do anything violent? You're a victim of disinformation.”
• Vivek (33:43): “People who are willing to lie... If you are, you get in. If not, you don't.”

---

Conclusion

In this robust episode, Charlie Kirk and Vivek dissect critical issues facing America today, from foreign policy missteps and media-driven disinformation to the complexities of immigration law and the contested narrative surrounding January 6th. Their discussion underscores a staunchly conservative perspective, advocating for strict law enforcement, protection of free speech, and a reclamation of American values against what they perceive as liberal overreach.

Listeners gain insight into the conservative critique of current administrative policies, the importance placed on constitutional fidelity, and the challenges of navigating a polarized political landscape. Whether in agreement or contention, the podcast offers a comprehensive look at the debates shaping contemporary American discourse.

---

For more episodes and in-depth discussions, visit CharlieKirk.com and subscribe to The Charlie Kirk Show.

Transcript

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay, everybody, my conversation at Georgia State University with Vikramaswamy. Enjoy this. Become a member today. Members.charliekirk.com members.charliekirk. com today and also please come to AmFest. That's AmFest.com AMF E S T.com AmFest.com listen to this promo.

[Promo Announcer]

American Patriots get ready for the biggest event of the year. Join thousands in hearing the leading voices of movement featuring Charlie Kirk, Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon, Donald Trump Jr. Dr. Ben Carson, Tim Cru, Senator Josh Hawley, Kimberly Guilfoyle, Matt Walsh, Michael Knowles, Ben Shapiro, Jack Posovic, Danica Patrick, Patrick Bett, David Brett Cooper, Tom holman and more. December 19th through 22nd in Phoenix, Arizona. Get inspired and make a difference at America Fest 2024. Register today at amfest.com email us as.

[Charlie Kirk]

Always, freedomarliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Get your tickets to AmericaFest amfest.com I mean, come on, you can't get a better speaker lineup than this. Amfest.comampst.com Buckle up everybody. Here we go. Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.

[Melinda]

Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks. I want to thank Charlie. He's an incredible guy. His spirit, his love of this country. He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point usa.

[Charlie Kirk]

We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives. And we are going going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country. That's why we are here. Noble Gold Investments is the official gold sponsor of the Charlie Kirk Show, a company that specializes in gold IRAs and physical delivery of precious metals. Learn how you could protect your wealth with Noble gold investments@noblegold investments.com that is noblegold investments.com. it's where I buy all of my gold. Go to noblegold investments.com.

[Melinda]

Hi, I'm Melinda and I'm here to say that Trump is very anti American. He's anti American, he's pro violence and he's pro war.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Give one example where he's pro war.

[Melinda]

Well, he's very poor. Roar when it comes to sewing division within the American people itself. So in a recent interview I think was at Fox News, he talked about the enemy within. He also talking about he's been shot.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

At twice and is it, is that, is that fair to call somebody who's shooting at him an enemy? Is that a fair game or not.

[Melinda]

By a Fellow Republican.

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, hold on.

[Melinda]

They were Republican. No, they were registered Republican.

[Charlie Kirk]

Ryan Ruth was not a registered Republican. And by the way, it should not matter who their party affiliation is. We should agree that if someone's get shot at and he mentions enemy within, he probably gets a pass on that.

[Unknown Audience Member]

Yeah.

[Melinda]

I mean, people also shot at Mussolini. Right.

[Charlie Kirk]

But do you think Trump and Mussolini are moral equivalents?

[Melinda]

Well, that wasn't the example here. The.

[Charlie Kirk]

No, you brought up Mussolini. I didn't.

[Melinda]

Well, yeah, the reason why I brought up Mussolini is because obviously we know that people who. We call that pro war.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Just to Jonathan Trump's quote on that was just, just. We're leveling just on the same facts said Rat. These radical lunatics are the enemy within. He has been shot at twice. I would call those people radical lunatics or enemy within. Do you disagree with that characterization?

[Melinda]

By his own side.

[Charlie Kirk]

He was not shot at. By his own side.

[Melinda]

Yeah, they were registered Republicans.

[Charlie Kirk]

No, again, Ryan Ruth was not a registered Republican. No, he was not. Okay, he donated.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Anyone who shoots at you is not on your side.

[Melinda]

Again, again, there's also common talking point when it comes to talking. A common talking point Republicans have is that there was no new wars when he was.

[Charlie Kirk]

Yeah. What war did he start?

[Melinda]

Well, when it comes to no new wars, he assassinated Soleimani.

[Charlie Kirk]

No, no, that's not a war. That's a specific military action. What was the war that Trump started?

[Melinda]

Well, there was no war that Joe Biden started.

[Charlie Kirk]

Of course there was. He financed the Russian Ukrainian war and he invaded Ukraine. How much do you know about the Istanbul meeting five days into the war between Tony Blinken, Boris Johnson and the Russian ambassador.

[Melinda]

So you don't know.

[Charlie Kirk]

That's fine. Hold on a second. Because we actually had a chance to have a peace deal five days into the war and it was the United States of America that came in and blew up the peace deal in Istanbul, Turkey. The audience will tell you I'm right. It was our own government that wanted the war to continue. So that's Joe Biden's war.

[Melinda]

Well, no, there's more to that. It's a little hot outside, so I can't do my research right now. But when it comes to.

[Charlie Kirk]

Why does the temperature impact your research? I don't understand.

[Melinda]

Well, it's hot outside. I've been here all day, so my brain's a little fuzzy. So, number one, when it comes to this idea that Trump is anti war or there was no new wars under.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Trump, he's anti war.

[Melinda]

There was plenty of wars that were going on during Trump's time.

[Charlie Kirk]

Can you name them?

[Melinda]

And he's also very pro dictators. Like, he's friends with Kim Jong Un. He talks highly.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

So we were on the verge of. We were on the verge of war with North Korea. When Barack Obama left the office, Oval Office. The thing he told Donald Trump is our top threat is North Korea. I don't care if Donald Trump calls Kim Jong Un a friend or not. He got us off the brink of war with North Korea, which is actually what I care about.

[Melinda]

We were not really on brink of war when it comes.

[Charlie Kirk]

No, it's correct.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Barack Obama thought we were.

[Charlie Kirk]

Obama said to Donald Trump, you need to watch out for two things. Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn and North Korea. That were the only two things Obama said to him in Obama's own telling of events in that short Oval Office meeting. So Obama even said North Korea is your number one threat.

[Melinda]

Well, I disagree with Obama. North Korea was not our number one threat. North Korea is an ant compared to America.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Let me ask you, you're anti war. Are you anti war?

[Melinda]

Very anti.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Okay. Do you believe the Russia Ukraine war needs to come to an end?

[Melinda]

Yes.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Russia, which is the candidate which has said that we need to end the Russia Ukraine war? Which is. Which is the candidate who said we need to continue funding the Russia Ukraine war?

[Melinda]

Trump is for backing up.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Trump is for ending the Russia Ukraine war. That's what he said. Kamala Harris is continuing to fund the Russia Ukraine warrants that you would continue to vote in favor of it.

[Melinda]

She's under.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Which candidate? Was there a major war in the Middle East? Was there a major war in the Middle Eastern or Donald Trump, to the.

[Melinda]

First point, when it comes to Ukraine and Russia, America is funding the Ukraine because of agreement we had in what, 2014. We're holding up a peace treaty with NATO that if any country who wants to join.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Is Ukraine part of NATO?

[Melinda]

I was about to finish. If any country who wants to be a part of NATO gets sort of bombarded from imperialist other countries like Russia, we have to as our duty. And it's not just America giving Ukraine money as. As our duty signed in the treaty that we have with them, we have to give them some type of funding.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Yeah. So look, the. There's the NATO treaty that actually says we're going to defend a NATO ally. Article 5. That doesn't apply to Ukraine because Ukraine is not a member.

[Charlie Kirk]

I know, I know. You're talking. Why.

[Melinda]

Why was Ukraine not a member yet? Because Russia invaded them. That's not because they wanted to be.

[Charlie Kirk]

No, no. Ukraine should never. Do you think Ukraine should be part of NATO?

[Melinda]

Yes, of course.

[Charlie Kirk]

Whoa.

[Unknown Audience Member]

Okay.

[Charlie Kirk]

That's remarkable.

[Melinda]

Yeah.

[Charlie Kirk]

Yes.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

So the US actually made a commitment back in 1990, NATO would expand not one inch past East Germany. Our Secretary of State made that commitment to his counterpart in actually was Gorbachev, who led the Soviet Union. So we've actually in some ways been responsible for creating the conditions that have created global instability. But that's actually gone up under Joe Biden. So I'm with you on being anti war. I'll just look at what were the major wars under Donald Trump. We still haven't named one. What are the major wars under Joe Biden? We have several. From what's going on in the Middle East, Israel, Hamas to Russia, Ukraine, and I judge based on results.

[Melinda]

Clarifying question. When you say new wars under Joe Biden, is that implying that Joe Biden started these wars?

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

They occurred under his administration, supported and.

[Charlie Kirk]

Subsidized them and paid for them. For example, Donald Trump prevented an Israeli Hamas war.

[Melinda]

How?

[Charlie Kirk]

Through the Abraham Accords. The Abraham Accords was bringing all the people to the table, cut Palestinian Authority funding, also cut Iranian funding. Said the Iran piggy bank could not fund terror throughout the region. Brought Saudi Arabia, the United Emirates, Bahrain and Israel in the room and signed a historic once in a generation peace deal between those Arab partners and Israel. And that region was the quietest it ever was in 50 years with Russia, Ukraine. He told Vladimir Putin, you go into Ukraine, I will bomb Moscow immediately. It's interesting. Under George W. Bush, Vladimir Putin took Georgia. Under Obama, he took Crimea. Under Biden, he took the Donbas. Under Trump, he didn't take anything. Why is that? Under under Trump, Vladimir Putin did not gain a square inch of new territory. Why is that?

[Melinda]

Trump literally talks about deals that he or secret meetings that we know.

[Charlie Kirk]

But it's just a very simple question. If Trump was bought by Putin or was friends with Putin, why was. Why did Putin not expand his country under Trump and every other president he expanded his country under?

[Melinda]

What do you mean?

[Charlie Kirk]

So under Bush. Under Bush, Russia got bigger. Under Obama, Russia got bigger. Under Biden, Russia got bigger. Under Trump, Russia stayed the same. Why is that?

[Melinda]

Russia didn't stay the same. They tried to invade Ukraine.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

No, not under Trump.

[Charlie Kirk]

Not under Trump. That invasion was in January of 2000, February 2022.

[Melinda]

Trump supports Putin.

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, no, he doesn't. Actually. It's interesting.

[Melinda]

He talks about how good Putin was.

[Charlie Kirk]

No, he believes in diplomacy. For example, do you believe that FDR was right in partnering with Joseph Stalin to defeat Hitler.

[Melinda]

Yes.

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay. So at times you have to partner with really bad people for a broader goal. That is called.

[Melinda]

But Ukraine is not the enem.

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, we're not saying, you know, who is the enemy. China is the enemy.

[Melinda]

And Russia.

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, Russia's not the enemy. Exactly. How many of your friends have died because of Russians?

[Melinda]

How many of your friends died because of Ukraine?

[Charlie Kirk]

A lot of your friends have died here because of the cartels. And we don't call them an enemy. And they are an enemy within. So when Donald Trump is talking about enemies in, he's talking about the cartels that are here, that are poisoning our streets with drugs, that are bringing illegal guns into the country. That is the enemy within. Yet we say Russia is an enemy. Russia has never attacked the United States of America.

[Melinda]

There is proof that Russia has been funding far right groups in America. Russia is also very tied to, to a lot of prominent right leaning figures. There's a lot of Russian money, funding and right wing.

[Charlie Kirk]

In order to play that out, first of all, you're talking about like a couple right wing podcasters that received Russian cash.

[Melinda]

Not a couple.

[Charlie Kirk]

Just, just, just so we're clear, Hillary Clinton received money from the mayor of Moscow's wife. So did Hunter Biden. They give money all across the political spectrum. But I just want to be very clear because I think it's important. Can you show me one new ground war that started under Donald Trump for his four years?

[Melinda]

There was no new wars under Joe.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Biden either that started, well, Ukraine, Russia and the Hamas Israel war started under Joe Biden's watch. Do you believe, do you believe it's the job of the United States commander in chief to lead by securing peace and reducing risk for the United States? Do you believe that? I think you probably do. Of course. And do you believe that you should judge a president based on their results or based on their words?

[Charlie Kirk]

Both.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Okay, so I judge based on results. And on the basis of those results, we had no new wars under Donald Trump. We have at least two major new wars under Biden. And for my part, I don't care whether Donald Trump calls some other world leader a friend or not. What I care about is whether he's advancing American interests. Trump, that's what wins in the talks.

[Melinda]

About putting more funding into Israel to, to Jenna to further the genocide of the Palestinians.

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay, we've already discussed that earlier, but I'm guessing you're voting for Kamala Harris. I'm just kind of guessing. Am I right?

[Melinda]

Yeah. Unfortunately, yes. I'm not. I'm not a Kamala Stan.

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay, fair. Why is that?

[Melinda]

It's complicated. But no, go ahead.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

This is interesting.

[Melinda]

Well, no, it's. It's complicated. I'm more anti Trump than I am pro. Kamala Harris.

[Charlie Kirk]

Hey, this is Charlie Kirk from my friends@best hot grill.com Football is back and so is tailgating. I'm so excited football's back by the way. Whether it's Friday night lights Saturday, college football, my favorite Go Ducks or pro Sundays. Solaire Tailgate Infrared grills set up fast and heat up quickly. Only three minutes to searing hot temperatures. Just like the big backyard Solaires. A Solaire grill will make you the master of the tailgate with the juiciest, most flavorful food in the parking lot. And the fast grilling times leave you more time to enjoy the pre game festivities. They also cool down fast so that you won't miss a minute of the game. The USA made Solaire anywhere, everywhere and all about Infrared grills are portable and perfect for any grilling on the go. From picnics to camping to RV to boating, but especially tailgating. Amaze your tailgating friends with the great food you grill with Solaire Infrared Grill. Learn more about these fantastic grills and Solaire's Try before you buy demo rental program at Best Hot Grill.com that's Bestaught Grill.com Best Hot Grill.com.

[Melinda]

What do you.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Think is important for the country? I think pick your top two issues. What are the top two issues for the country?

[Melinda]

The top two issues for the country is what do you want to see.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Happen in the next four years?

[Melinda]

Getting rid of disinformation and also securing more hope in our system.

[Charlie Kirk]

So disinformation is protected by the first Amendment, you would agree?

[Melinda]

Yes. Disinformation when it comes to news outlets is what I mainly talk.

[Charlie Kirk]

So you and I both agree we should pull CNN's broadcasting license.

[Melinda]

More like. More like Fox News.

[Charlie Kirk]

No, that's the point is that all of a sudden CNN has a right to be able to do what they do.

[Melinda]

Fox Fox News is actually currently actually I think about a year ago is going through a deflammatory.

[Charlie Kirk]

Do you think that court case. Do you think that it should be legal to have different opinions? Of course you do. So where do you Legal. Legal legal.

[Melinda]

I mean yeah, I'm mainly talking about news corporates or like news outlets and also big media figures who can spin sort of disinformation and that can swing the election. For example, like Elon Musk targeting people on his platform that are liberal and targeting or like pushing out.

[Charlie Kirk]

Why should that be illegal?

[Melinda]

Because he's trying to sway the election.

[Charlie Kirk]

So he's an in event he's a citizen, should Taylor Swift not be able to speak about she swaying the election?

[Melinda]

Well, no.

[Charlie Kirk]

How is Taylor Swift and Elon Musk different? She's far more popular.

[Melinda]

Because Elon Musk on his platform is prohibiting information about Kamala. Kamala Harris.

[Charlie Kirk]

No, he's not.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Let me just say one thing. We're all against disinformation here, but let me just ask you two pieces of disinformation that we know are disinformation. Where did the pandemic begin in China? In a lab. No, you don't believe, you don't think it began in a lab in China because that's not widely accepted, that that's where it began. Yet if you said that in 2020, and I don't blame you, I blame the fact that we created disinformation in this country.

[Charlie Kirk]

You're a victim of disinformation because it.

[Melinda]

Was created in a lab.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

It was created in a lab. And I don't even, I don't even blame you. I don't even blame you because the government stopped you from being able to know that. So right now we have, we're having a conversation where you believe that the pandemic did not begin, that COVID 19 did not begin in a lab in China because guess what, that's exactly what our government required you to believe. If anybody said it did, they required it to be censored.

[Melinda]

What evidence do you have that was created in lab?

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

You have actually genetic. You now actually have the genetics of the virus to be able to go back to actually the lab that was manipulating a non human virus. It was never a naturally occurring virus. The only way that they now know.

[Charlie Kirk]

Based on the genesis, not a national SARS COV2.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

SARS COV2 is not.

[Charlie Kirk]

It's. It's current again.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

It spreads. It was designed to spread more rapidly is exactly why I did. But, but, but suffice to say that now at least every major scientist or medical researcher today who said two years ago that it did not believes this is the most likely origin of the pandemic. And yet most of the public, including even yourself, believes what the government told us two years ago. That's actual disinformation. Let me ask you another thing. Was the Hunter Biden laptop story on the eve of the last election, the 2020 presidential election, there was a lot of Compromising information about Hunter Biden found on a laptop that was found about a month before the election. Was that made up or was that actually true?

[Melinda]

Hunter Biden was prosecuted.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Was that was the laptop story? Was it true or false?

[Melinda]

It doesn't matter.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Turns out it was true, but you were told it was false.

[Charlie Kirk]

So we share with you a passion.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

For getting rid of disinformation.

[Charlie Kirk]

You do it for free speech. The Central Intelligence Agency came out and signed a letter, 50 of them, saying that this was Russian disinformation. I lost my Twitter account because I started to share the Hunter Biden laptop during the election. One in four swing voters during the 2020 election said they would have voted differently if they knew about the Hunter Biden laptop. That's our own government, and that's disinformation. Yeah, but his father. His dad was all throughout the laptop talking about foreign deals, Chinese cash, Ukrainian meetings, Russian deals. All that was in the lap.

[Melinda]

Hunter Biden was prosecuted. Right. That's not just like how Trump was prosecuted.

[Charlie Kirk]

Right, right.

[Melinda]

34 felons.

[Charlie Kirk]

Yeah, we got that. So I'm going back, though, to the laptop. Our own government came in and said that that laptop was Russian disinformation. Let me ask you a question, though. Do you believe that saying that closing schools during COVID was a good thing?

[Melinda]

Yes.

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay. That is now widely accepted as being epidemiologically wrong, morally wrong.

[Melinda]

Who?

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

We got a lot of kids who are now suffering from mental health disorders. You have a lot of kids who have failed to acclimate socially, were 2, 3, 4 years old, but that grew up in the same.

[Charlie Kirk]

Again, more importantly, should I have been able to say during the pandemic that closing schools was wrong? You as an individual and my media company.

[Melinda]

Your media company. Probably not, but you as an individual. Sure.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

So. So we're going to dis. I agree. And this one, we're going to agree to disagree.

[Charlie Kirk]

We have a different Stalinist view of speech.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Well, I mean, Charlie, I think we could. Even the labels aside, if somebody believes that you should not have been able to say during the pandemic that schools should remain open. If it's your belief that a media company should not have been allowed to say that, then I think if you're voting for Kamala Harris, you are voting for the right candidate for you. I truly believe that.

[Melinda]

Okay, sure.

[Charlie Kirk]

She is the censorship candidate. Her belief for the world is that if Charlie Kirk and Elon Musk get.

[Melinda]

Too powerful, when Donald Trump said that people who kneel for the national anthem should go to jail. Is that free speech?

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, he never said they should go to jail. He said they're not patriotic. He never said they should go to jail.

[Melinda]

Yes, he did.

[Charlie Kirk]

Again, he never said they should go to jail.

[Zach]

Yes, he did.

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay, see this again. You are a victim of disinformation. No, let me ask you. Let me ask you just one more question. Can men give birth?

[Melinda]

Can men give birth? Yeah, if they're transgender.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

So again, I mean, the beauty of this country. No, but the beauty of this country is that she gets to have that view and vote for who she wants. And I think we have laid out here, this is a Kamala Harris voter. Right? If you believe men can give birth. Birth. Vote for Kamala Harris, not Donald Trump. If you believe that you should not have been allowed to say as a media company, that schools should not have closed during COVID 19, that you should have been banned from saying it. Absolutely. Kamala Harris, your candidate, not Donald Trump, your media. This lays out. This lays out the choice of the.

[Melinda]

Media Companies should not put out disinformation.

[Charlie Kirk]

But who. Let me just one more question. Who? Judges. Judges. It's disinformation. Who's in charge of that standard?

[Melinda]

It depends on what it is. If we're talking about COVID we should look for the medical scientists and doctors.

[Charlie Kirk]

Were they wrong about anything during COVID Something? So then why should we give them unilateral authority? This is where we're definitely.

[Melinda]

We believe the first science, not scripture. So science can be changed. Yes, that's how science work. It always evolves. We believe that the earth was in the center of the universe.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Should a media company. Should a media company be allowed to say that climate change is not an existential risk to humanity?

[Melinda]

It depends on what type of data that they're putting out.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

So if a media company says the climate change agenda is made up on false premises and that, you know what, global surface temperatures should be allowed to go up, should they be banned from saying it?

[Melinda]

Should a media company say that bleach is good to drink?

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

They should be allowed to say, first.

[Charlie Kirk]

Of all, that never happened. That never happened. Never happened.

[Melinda]

They should be allowed to say that.

[Charlie Kirk]

And they should be allowed to say it. Of course, because the first amendment protects all speech, hate speech, disinformation, misinformation, and correct speech. You cannot police for individual and. No. And companies, and individual, like companies, individuals, LLCs, companies are run by platforms. The free speech transcends all platforms all the time. And you cannot all of a sudden.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

I think this is useful because I.

[Charlie Kirk]

Do think there's a difference in opinion so illuminating.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

And if you have your. If you have the views you do, I do think Kamala Harris is your candidate.

[Charlie Kirk]

And the final point and the beauty of our country is under your view. Last thing. Let's say Trump wins and becomes supreme dictator of America. Why would you give him the power to shut up liberal media? What you believe that the experts or whatever should be able to close disinformation. If Trump were to win, why would you give him that power to shut up liberal media?

[Melinda]

If the liberal media is wrong, but.

[Charlie Kirk]

Trump would say they're wrong, so he'll shut it up. That's the point.

[Melinda]

Is Trump an expert?

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay, that's the point is that at some point, that's why you should have First Amendment, because whoever's in charge gets to determine what is right or wrong. That is what Orwell wrote about.

[Melinda]

When it comes to medical and scientific. The things like that, it should be.

[Charlie Kirk]

They were wrong about everything. They were wrong about six feet to slow the spread. They were wrong about the vaccine safe and effective.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

They were late.

[Melinda]

They were.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

They were wrong about whether the earth revolves around the sun, by the way.

[Charlie Kirk]

Heliocentric theory for a long time.

[Melinda]

Through politicians. Right.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Through free speech and open debate, which we need more of.

[Charlie Kirk]

Open debate gets you to truth, not totalitarianism. Thank you so much. That is one of the scariest I've. I've heard in my 12 years of doing this.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

She's a victim. I mean, I'm not.

[Charlie Kirk]

No, I mean, that's the death of the country if you just say I should be able to shut you up.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Because I'm not mad at her, man.

[Charlie Kirk]

I'm just saying it's like, so is.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

A victim of what's going on.

[Charlie Kirk]

Chilling.

[Zach]

Okay, so I'll try to be as quick as possible because I have to go to class, but I want to go back to January 6th real quick.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Just.

[Zach]

Let's just start with, like, a point of a common ground. Hypothetically, if one of our candidates had insurrected the government, or at least attempted to, do you think that candidate is eligible to be voting? Like, to be voted upon?

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, the Constitution says no, but it wasn't an insurrection. No one's been tried for insurrection.

[Zach]

And you realize that he's being tried on them.

[Charlie Kirk]

No, he isn't.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

He's actually not.

[Zach]

Well, not on insurrection, the specific statute. But he's being fined for that.

[Charlie Kirk]

Insurrection is a very specific crime in the federal code. He is not being tried for insurrection.

[Zach]

Yeah, I understand that. But he's still being tried on that case, right?

[Charlie Kirk]

No, he's being tried on the events of that day, which is not an insurrection. That I word is actually a super important, important word because that literally means armed rebellion to overtake the United States.

[Zach]

Not necessarily. You don't have to.

[Charlie Kirk]

So just, it does have definition.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Which class are you going to? Which class do you have?

[Zach]

Ethics.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Ethics. Okay, so it's relevant. So go to costume.

[Zach]

Section 3.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Section 3. The 14th Amendment, though. Insurrection is the word that's used.

[Zach]

Indeed.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

So there was, there was actually, there was widespread speculation about whether Jack Smith would bring this case against Donald Trump.

[Zach]

Indeed.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Yep. He did not. Because the legal definition and the reason Jack Smith didn't bring the case is that he would have lost nine. Oh. At the Supreme Court if.

[Zach]

Well, hold on, because that's funny that you say that.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

That's exactly the result that they had with a number of the cases that have gone to the Supreme Court as well.

[Zach]

You say it would be. It would be nine on the Supreme Court. Right.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

As it was on the case where Trump could be on the ballot. When did the Supreme Court. It was nine zero, hands down. This would have been nine zero as well.

[Unknown Audience Member]

Hey, everybody, Charlie Kirk here. If you ever had a doubt that there's a war on the unborn, you now know beyond a doubt, that is the case. It'd be easy to give up. But you know, I'll never give up on giving the truth to girls and women who the other side want to choose death for their baby. I'm standing for life no matter what the other side says. And we're going to save more babies than ever before to show them that truth will win out. It can only be shared with girls and women who will make the right choice. Preborn provides free ultrasounds to girls and women. It's the truth that they deserve, and it doubles the chance that she'll choose life. $140 gives five mothers a free ultrasound and saves babies. $280 can save 10 babies. And just $28 a month can save a baby a month for less than.

[Charlie Kirk]

A dollar a day.

[Unknown Audience Member]

Whether you want to save one baby or five or hundreds, join me in saving babies right now. Call 833-850-2229 or click on the preborn [e-mail] that is a $15,000 gift. We'll provide an ultrasound machine that will save lives for years to come. Go to pre born bannerarlikerk.com I'm a donor and you should be a donor.

[Charlie Kirk]

As well.

[Unknown Audience Member]

Go to charliekirk.com and click on the pre born banner.

[Zach]

One of Trump's private counsels, one of his lawyers. Right. I believe his name was.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Name doesn't matter.

[Charlie Kirk]

John Eastman.

[Zach]

Eastman. Correct. Is it not true that he also thought that his plan to attempt to coup to the governor, let's say, subvert the electoral process in 2020, would lose 7. 2 of the Supreme Court, and then he later amended that comment by saying it would actually probably lose nine. Zero Supreme Court. You understand that?

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

So what was your. What is. What is the question you have as.

[Zach]

It relates to January 6th? It's very simple. Okay. If one of our presidential candidates had attempted to coup the government, he is unelectable, obviously. Correct. And you just deny the fact that Trump attempted to coup the government?

[Charlie Kirk]

No, he did not. That's not what happened that day. What happened that day is he had a rally a mile and a half away from the Capitol.

[Zach]

Okay, sorry. To everybody here, I implore you to read the first section of Jack Smith's court filings or read the Wikipedia page or read the one.

[Charlie Kirk]

But you have to be honest. Half of that got thrown up by the US Supreme Court on presidential immunity. Right? Do you think that half of it is invalidated?

[Zach]

Do you think that was a reasonable Supreme Court ruling?

[Charlie Kirk]

Course, more than reasonable.

[Zach]

You really think so?

[Charlie Kirk]

Yes, it was. It was nearly unanimous.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Even though we're pivoting.

[Charlie Kirk]

It's not pivoting. You have to be honest. Do you think Barack Obama should be able to be tried for work?

[Zach]

I don't want to see.

[Charlie Kirk]

I'm saying this. You have one. Your standard must apply equally. Presidential immunity means what happens when you do during president cannot be. You cannot have crimes brought against you if it's in your official code of business. You agree with that?

[Zach]

No, absolutely not. Okay.

[Charlie Kirk]

Yes, there is.

[Zach]

There is none.

[Charlie Kirk]

Let me finish. Okay. Obama killed a US Citizen without due process on foreign soil. That is a war crime.

[Zach]

No, it's not.

[Charlie Kirk]

Yes.

[Zach]

Wait, he went to legal counsel. Correct.

[Charlie Kirk]

But legal counsel can be wrong, man.

[Zach]

It doesn't matter.

[Charlie Kirk]

I could bring that case. I could bring that case in any jurisdiction across the country. He did not get First Amendment rights, Second Amendment rights, fourth Amendment rights, Fifth Amendment rights, six member rights. They just drone strike a US Citizen. Imagine if the government just does that. They just come by and pop you in the head. That's illegal. And Obama did that. But, however, I don't think Obama should be able to go to prison because you should get immunity as president against your actions or else A president would never be able to do anything. But sure.

[Zach]

Okay. Regardless. Okay. Going back to January 6th. Okay. You do acknowledge what? Like, do you acknowledge any of the voter fraud allegations?

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Do you think Donald Trump committed a coup against the US Government?

[Zach]

He attempted to, absolutely.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

So why do you believe he left the White House?

[Zach]

What do you mean? Why do you leave the White House?

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Somebody who's really leading a coup.

[Zach]

It failed.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Why did he call for the protesters to go home? I just think this idea.

[Zach]

He didn't do that though, right. Three hours in the White House as correct.

[Charlie Kirk]

Within 30 minutes. Within 30 minutes. He sent a tweet out. 30 minutes.

[Zach]

Hold on. He said to stay. He said to remain peaceful. Correct. He told rioters to remain peaceful.

[Charlie Kirk]

Peaceful and patriotically before anything ever happened at the Capitol.

[Zach]

When. Okay, he said that one time during his one and a half hour speech at the Ellipse. Correct.

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, so you acknowledge he said peaceful and patriotically marked.

[Zach]

I'm not a 4 year old who analyzes the speech out of like takes out one sentence from a speech and says it's all okay.

[Charlie Kirk]

When did he ever say do anything violent?

[Zach]

He said to fight, fight, fight, or else you're gonna lose the country. What does that mean?

[Charlie Kirk]

Do you know what else? When he said fight, fight, fight after.

[Zach]

You got shot, what does that mean?

[Charlie Kirk]

You know, also, you know who says fight, fight, fight. Kamala Harris has it as her campaign slogan. Fight, fight, fight. When we fight, we win. I heard every 20 seconds, wait, did.

[Zach]

Kamala Harris or the Democrats try to crew the government?

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, actually, yes, it.

[Zach]

Right. Oh, let's do it. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

[Charlie Kirk]

Hold on a second. How did she, how did she become candidate? How many votes did she get?

[Zach]

She's on the ticket because of a coup.

[Charlie Kirk]

They removed the sitting president named Joe Biden and put her on the top.

[Zach]

Who are you voting for?

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

What are you voting?

[Zach]

A ticket. Who are you voting for?

[Charlie Kirk]

Actually, no. In the primary, you're only voting for Joe Biden, not Kamala Harris. In a primary campaign, Kamala Harris was not on the ticket. And you know that's correct. Joe Biden received 16 million primary votes without Kamala Harris as her VP. And all of a sudden they say.

[Zach]

I love her pivoting all the way out this amazing.

[Charlie Kirk]

You're the one doing the rabbit hole. I just want to ask question though. Who died on January 6?

[Zach]

One person or multiple police officers?

[Charlie Kirk]

No, actually one person died on January six and it was Ashley Babbitt, an unarmed Trump supporter who got shot in the head by one.

[Zach]

Maybe she shouldn't have trespassed in the Capitol. I don't know. Yeah, I know. It's gonna be hard one. I will bite that bullet. Absolutely.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Obama's death penalty now makes more sense.

[Charlie Kirk]

Exactly. No, so the death penalty for walking through your own Capitol.

[Zach]

No, but you shouldn't be trespassing, trying to subvert the election results. Correct.

[Charlie Kirk]

Have you seen the video? What happened? No warning whatsoever. Lieutenant Michael Berg pops her right in the head. And this guy says, oh, crime.

[Zach]

No warning.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Really?

[Zach]

He pulled out the gun.

[Charlie Kirk]

What do you think about that?

[Zach]

What do you expect to happen?

[Charlie Kirk]

Did you get mad about the death of George Floyd?

[Zach]

I don't. I don't. I really don't care about any of this. I don't. I don't care. Go back to the focus. It's irrelevant to those. It's irrelevant.

[Charlie Kirk]

No, it's not. The whole country blew up for George Floyd, and yet a Trump supporter get shot in the head peacefully and patriotically protesting. And that's.

[Zach]

I ask for all of you to read the first section of Jack Smith's court filing.

[Charlie Kirk]

No one's gonna read that crap. Okay.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Instead.

[Zach]

You know, I'm not surprised. I'm not surprised.

[Charlie Kirk]

No.

[Zach]

But we have gotten to the point where we don't trust the media. We don't trust our legislator. We don't. Correct executive. We don't. We don't trust.

[Charlie Kirk]

You know why? They haven't earned our trust.

[Zach]

All right.

[Reggie]

True.

[Charlie Kirk]

What? No. Let's go to the list Hunter Biden laptop. Misinformation. Where did the virus come from? Bio labs in Ukraine. No, it's exactly. Fine. It's okay. Go. Go to your ethics class.

[Unknown Audience Member]

All right. I'm. My name is Zach. I'm 38 years old. I dropped out of college my first semester 20 years ago, so I'm not indoctrinated. You won't hear any of that crazy information coming from me. So. I watch all you guys all the time. I agree with 99% of the stuff I hear y'all say might have to do with the fact that watching Yalls helped develop my.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Well, 100 would be weird.

[Unknown Audience Member]

Anyway, so question for both of you about immigration. It's kind of on the same conversation the guy earlier had whose parents were from Mexico. I know y'all say we should follow the laws that are on the books, but a more nuanced question I have is I've got several.

[Reggie]

I work.

[Unknown Audience Member]

I'm a landscaper. I've got several friends that are Hispanic. Some are here illegally, some aren't. One Friend in particular has multiple children that have been born here. I've got other friends that have kids that they brought with them. And I'm curious what Yalls thoughts are on that group that doesn't really get talked about. These kids that are brought here before the age of consent that, you know, they're not natural born citizens. They don't, they don't have the, you know, they're not citizens like kids that are born here, but they were brought here before the age of consent and then they turned to adult into adults and, you know, have lives to live. I was wondering what your stance was on that.

[Charlie Kirk]

Yeah, I mean, I'm not running for office. All should be deported back as a family. But again, okay, that's why I wouldn't win an election. Yeah.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

So look, my view is we got to restore the rule of law. Sometimes it's uncomfortable. If your first act of entering this country broke the law, then you have to be returned to your country of origin. Now for kids, do they enjoy birthright citizenship? I think if you're here as the kid of illegals, birthright citizenship doesn't apply to you. And the reason why is even if I'll give you a different example.

[Charlie Kirk]

Right.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

The kid of a Mexican diplomat who's here in this country legally, if that kid's born on American soil, he doesn't actually get birthright citizenship. He's still a citizen of Mexico. So if the kid of a Mexican diplomat who's here legally doesn't enjoy birthright citizenship, then certainly somebody here illegally doesn't automatically get birthright citizenship either. So it's uncomfortable on the surface, but you got to think through it logically. And I think that that's the principle we have to apply.

[Unknown Audience Member]

Now just you can inform me, is that, is that aspect of it covered in the 14th amendment?

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Yes, it's a great question. So, so, so I'll tell you section one of the 14th amendment, here's how it goes. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof shall be citizens. So the. And subject to the jurisdiction thereof is the part that does the heavy lifting here. And because of that, the same reason the kid of the diplomat isn't a citizen, the kid of somebody who's here illegally doesn't enjoy that citizenship either. And so I think that is already Contemplated by the 14th Amendment, it also doesn't apply to foreign invaders. So if there's a foreign invader that crosses the Rio Grande and then has kids in the United States, nobody, no legal scholar in American History believes that that kid enjoys birthright citizenship. And I'll give you one more example, because you're asking smart question. Turns out even it didn't apply to Native Americans. So for a while, it didn't even apply. The kids of Native Americans, they had to pass a separate law to make that true, even after the 14th amendment. So that's why the arguments of birthright citizenship from the left often get distorted and oversimplified to what the actual truth of what the Constitution says. And I'm on the side of the Constitution.

[Charlie Kirk]

Thank you. Anyone disagree? Anyone? Disagreements? Okay, let's try to get a couple of those. Yeah, disagree. One, two. Yeah, and then you. And then we gotta run.

[Reggie]

My name is Reggie, and I'm a proud American, born in Chicago, raised here in Georgia. And my question is based on immigration. So I agree that illegal immigration is probably the biggest issue that America is facing right now. I mean, we see that the border crisis is, I mean, just devastating major cities like Chicago, which is where I'm from, in New York. But my question is for people like my grandmother, who is a immigrant from the Caribbean. We had this conversation, and she told me that she never even thought to come to this country illegally. She came using the law, following the law, and coming illegally never even crossed her mind. And she worked hard and she now lives a nice life here in Georgia, like me. So my question to you, both of you, is, how do we separate the people that come with good intentions, that want to build and build family legacies, and the people that come with bad intentions, like criminals, people from jails, et cetera?

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

I appreciate the respectful question. I respect your grandmother. She's like my parents who came to this country legally as well. Here's the way you separate it. Do you come following the law or do you come breaking the law?

[Reggie]

Right.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

That's the simple distinction. And if your first act of entering this country broke the law, I think it is legitimate for the United States of America to treat you as a lawbreaker. Now, on the question of legal immigration, who should actually be able to come in? My view is you should only be able to come in if you benefit America, that is, the American citizens who are already here. So that means if you're going to be a customer of the welfare state, Medicaid, welfare, etcetera, you shouldn't be allowed in.

[Reggie]

Right.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

If you can't speak English, you shouldn't be allowed in. If you don't know the first thing about the United States of America, you shouldn't be allowed in. And if you're not willing to actually work and make contributions to the people who live here, you shouldn't be allowed in.

[Reggie]

Okay.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

And I think it's that simple. I don't think we need to make it much more complicated. It's that simple. I respect the question. Yeah.

[Reggie]

But like my grandmother, she came from a very poor country. She didn't have any resources. She didn't have a lot of resources, so. But she worked very hard to build what she has today, so she wouldn't be able to come in.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

Well, I think she's going to make contributions to this country and she fits the criteria. People are going to assimilate into and love the United States. That's the kind of people our legal immigration system should select for today. It selects for. You know who it selects for? People who are willing to lie.

[Reggie]

Right.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

The number one human attribute that our legal immigration system selects for isn't who's smart, isn't who's going to work hard, isn't who loves the country. It's are you willing to lie to the US Government or not? If you are, you get in. If not, you don't.

[Charlie Kirk]

That's the way it works. Thank you so much. Thank you. Thanks so much for listening, everybody. Email us. As always, freedomarlykirk.com thanks so much for listening and God bless.

[Unknown Conservative Commentator]

For more on many of these stories and news you can Trust, go to charliekirk.com.