The Charlie Kirk Show: Why America Must Not Bomb Iran

Release Date: May 1, 2025
Host: Charlie Kirk
Guest: Nate Morris (Businessman and Potential Senate Candidate from Kentucky)

Introduction and Context

In this provocative episode of The Charlie Kirk Show, host Charlie Kirk engages in a critical discussion surrounding the contentious topic: Should America bomb Iran? This timely conversation gains further relevance following the departure of Mike Waltz from his role as National Security Advisor. Nate Morris, a successful businessman contemplating a Senate run in Kentucky, joins Kirk to delve into the complexities of American foreign policy and its domestic repercussions.

Mike Waltz's Departure as National Security Advisor

Kirk opens the dialogue by addressing the recent exit of Mike Waltz from the National Security Advisor position. He underscores the significance of Waltz's role in shaping U.S. foreign policy and the implications of his departure for the current administration.

Charlie Kirk [00:36]: "Nate Morris also joins the program who's thinking about running for Senate in Kentucky. Email us, as always, freedom charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Open up your podcast application and type in Charlie Kirk Show."

Nate Morris [00:32]: "Charlie, what you've done is incredible here... Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks."

Kirk critiques the neoconservative stance traditionally held by figures like Waltz, labeling it as an extension of outdated Marxist ideologies aimed at expanding American influence through force.

Charlie Kirk [05:00]: "Neoconservatism is actually an outgrowth of Marxism from the 1940s and 50s... bringing American values by force to the rest of the world."

Analysis of Neoconservative Foreign Policy

The discussion shifts to the broader critique of neoconservative foreign policy, highlighting past interventions in countries like Iraq, Vietnam, and Libya. Kirk argues that these actions have consistently led to prolonged conflicts and regional instability.

Charlie Kirk [07:45]: "The architects of the Iraq war, the architects of the Vietnam War... it's a bunch of cities along a couple rivers. Iran isn't like that. It's almost all mountains."

Debate Over Bombing Iran

The crux of the episode centers on whether the U.S. should undertake military strikes against Iran, particularly concerning its nuclear aspirations.

Charlie Kirk's Opposition: Kirk vehemently opposes the idea of bombing Iran, questioning the efficacy and intent behind such actions. He expresses skepticism towards intelligence reports suggesting Iran's imminent acquisition of nuclear weapons, citing past intelligence failures.

Charlie Kirk [12:15]: "Why are we trusting our intel agencies so quickly?... We have to prove it to us."

He emphasizes the potential for prolonged conflict, economic vulnerability, and the destruction of Iran’s infrastructure, which could inadvertently strengthen extremist factions.

Charlie Kirk [16:30]: "Military strikes against Iran would be war against Iran, period. If you strike Iran, they will respond with an actual declaration of war."

Nate Morris's Perspective: While Nate Morris doesn't directly advocate for bombing Iran, he supports a strong stance against foreign interventions and emphasizes the need to prioritize American interests over entanglements abroad.

Nate Morris [21:37]: "We've got to take care of our own first. If our own house isn't in order, we can't be great as a country."

Listener Feedback and Responses

Kirk presents a selection of listener emails, predominantly opposing military action against Iran. These emails highlight concerns about the potential escalation of conflicts, the strengthening of Islamic fundamentalism, and the historical ineffectiveness of neoconservative interventions.

Listener Valerie [34:10]: "I agree it's good to be skeptical of intelligence, but at the same time you shouldn't dismiss the threat of Iran out of hand."

Listener Aaron [35:00]: "I'm absolutely supportive of Iran being attacked and redeemed from a terrorist national state to a respectable national state."

Kirk responds to these emails by reinforcing his stance against bombing Iran, cautioning against the unforeseen consequences of military aggression.

Charlie Kirk [36:50]: "Striking Iran actually might make the Ayatollah stronger... They could declare martial law."

Senate Republicans and Judicial Activism

The conversation transitions to domestic politics, specifically the judiciary’s role in thwarting conservative agendas. Nate Morris criticizes Senate Republicans, particularly Mitch McConnell, for their reluctance to confront judicial activism and their allegiance to the "swamp."

Nate Morris [20:34]: "These are career politicians... they don’t want anybody from the outside coming in and shaking things up."

Nate Morris's Potential Senate Run and Priorities

Nate Morris outlines his motivations for entering the Senate race, positioning himself as an outsider committed to ending endless foreign wars and advocating for American economic interests.

Nate Morris [25:02]: "I've started a business with about $10,000 on a credit card, ended up taking that company public at $2 billion... it's time that we have a path to the American dream for every Kentuckian."

He emphasizes his business acumen and dedication to representing the working class, distancing himself from the entrenched political elite.

Trade Deals and Tariffs

Kirk and Morris discuss the impact of President Trump’s trade policies on Kentucky’s economy. They laud the use of tariffs as a strategic tool to leverage better trade agreements, ensuring that American workers and industries are prioritized.

Nate Morris [27:21]: "We're finally using our economic might to get the best deal... it's taken a business leader like President Trump to be able to say, we've got all this leverage."

He highlights the benefits for local industries, particularly the automotive sector, and underscores the need for domestic manufacturing to bolster national security.

Conclusion and Final Thoughts

In wrapping up, Kirk reiterates his opposition to bombing Iran, stressing the unpredictable and destructive nature of military interventions. He calls for listeners to consider the long-term consequences of such actions and to support leaders who prioritize American interests and peace over unnecessary conflicts.

Charlie Kirk [35:26]: "No, we should not bomb Iran... Thank you so much for listening, everybody. Email us. As always, freedomarliekirk.com thanks so much for listening and God bless."

Nate Morris leaves the conversation with a call to action for Kentuckians to support candidates like himself who aim to disrupt the status quo and advocate for genuine representation in Washington D.C.

Notable Quotes

• Charlie Kirk [05:00]: "Neoconservatism is actually an outgrowth of Marxism from the 1940s and 50s... bringing American values by force to the rest of the world."
• Nate Morris [21:37]: "We've got to take care of our own first. If our own house isn't in order, we can't be great as a country."
• Charlie Kirk [12:15]: "Why are we trusting our intel agencies so quickly?... We have to prove it to us."
• Charlie Kirk [16:30]: "Military strikes against Iran would be war against Iran, period."
• Nate Morris [25:02]: "I've started a business with about $10,000 on a credit card, ended up taking that company public at $2 billion... it's time that we have a path to the American dream for every Kentuckian."

This episode offers a deep dive into the arguments against military intervention in Iran, the pitfalls of neoconservative policies, and the pressing need for authentic representation in the U.S. Senate. Through robust discussion and listener engagement, Kirk and Morris advocate for a more measured and America-first approach to both foreign and domestic policy.