Sidney Powell (30:38)

We believe this is a national security issue. There is no way that companies belonging to non US Corporations should have access to our election. In the case of smartmatic, there are a number of unanswered questions. That's why I wrote to the Secretary of the treasury and asked them to review the ownership.

Charlie Kirk (30:57)

It's offshore, it's murky. No one seems to know who owns it.

Sidney Powell (31:01)

Certainly our government should know.

Charlie Kirk (31:04)

So this was, this is a little bit dated. This is about 14 years ago, right? 14, 15 years ago. Were these questions ever answered or was it like a typical Washington D.C. exercise where you bring up a good point and then you get threatened and blackmailed and suppressed and then you just never mention it again? I'm just curious whether or not these Questions were answered 14 years ago when they were first presented. And so we know that foreign actors have been working with the Democrat Party in a variety of different ways to try and destroy Donald Trump. That's what the entire Ukrainian impeachment was all about. You see, the reason with the heavy emphasis on Russia and the hostility towards Russia is because the Democrats completely control Ukraine and they use it as a pseudo piggy bank for all of the ruling class families and their family members to be able to get board seats and positions so they can get walking around money, or in the Biden case, private jet flying around money because they live quite an extravagant lifestyle for the Scranton Amtrak riding with regular day Joe. He's got a lot of homes for being a middle class warrior. And so we know what these foreign actors are not just capable of, but what they're willing to do. And amazingly, the Democrats used this entire narrative of potential foreign interference to launch a special prosecutor and investigator in Bob Mueller in 2017. Republicans never should have authorized this. But Republicans trying to be the bigger person, trying to be decent, authorized the roaming special prosecutor far outside of his constitutional mandate, Bob Mueller, to go look into every single human being that was in the orbit of President Donald Trump. Now, what's the significance of that? Well, Republicans did this because we were worried that Democrats might lose total and complete faith in the American electoral system. We were worried because Democrats were starting to say that the Kremlin was dictating the direction of our elections. That bothered Republicans. We were worried that 30 or 40 million people, even though we agree with them on nothing, were gonna lose faith in the future of our republic. And we said that is not a good thing thing for America. So we stepped up, and I think many Republicans incorrectly stepped up and authorized the appointment of Bob Mueller. Now, I think Ron DeSantis actually voted against the appointment of Bob Mueller when he was a congressman and now governor of Florida, a terrific one. But Paul Ryan was one of the main driving forces behind the appointment of Bob Mueller. Bob Mueller, of course, then went and indicted everyone in remote proximity to Donald Trump, Roger Stone, Paul Manafort, none of. None of which, by the way, for any form of interference into the 2016 election. That was his mandate. But Bob Mueller justified it with Andrew Weissman and his angry Democrats. We are always going to indict and prosecute when we come across crimes. When you have that kind of prosecutorial authority, it makes the FBI and the DOJ look like they have their hands tied. And that was nothing more than a Trump delegitimization campaign to try to make it look like he was surrounded by a bunch of bad actors. And with that, Michael Cohen got tied up and he turned and went against President Trump. This was all part of a broader strategy to use Republicans worry about foreign interference against them to try and debase President Trump's political base and try to get what they wanted. And now Democrats are the ones saying, why would you dare say that a foreign actor could interfere in our election? It's the most secure election in American history. You were the ones that were pushing for us to get this authorized back in 2016. And in no way is it healthy for 70 million people to now say, I no longer trust our elections. You remember when money used to seem so simple? The global economy has become so complex. It makes the average investor freeze and do nothing. I believe in seeking wise financial counsel and not being controlled by fear. Let's say you have an old 401k sitting dormant and looking for a home. With new currencies and pandemic threats, there's never been a more logical time to ensure that your 401k is properly protected. For free advice on how to win with precious metals in an ira, I trust the friends of the show Noble Gold. Gold and silver are easy to buy and sell, plus they can be extremely enjoyable to collect. Home delivery of gold and silver coins make getting started easy. If you're open to talk to an analyst about intelligent options that fit your lifestyle, pick up the phone now and call Noble Gold. I use Noble Gold for my gold needs, and you should, too. Noblegoldinvestments.com that's noblegoldinvestments.com even though some people are taking the week off, it's still a busy and critical news week. Week of news. I should say I want to read this story here. It's very interesting. It is from Newsweek. That's why I was saying that newsweek.com Trump wants Congress to decide election and that strategy could win. Dershowitz says the real endgame for President Donald Trump's lawyers is to throw the 2020 election into the House of Representatives, where Trump would prevail. I think the strategy of the Trump legal team is not to get him the 270, but keep Joe Biden from getting to 270. Dershowitz told Zenger News. I don't think this is a charade of some kind. Dershowitz says he believes the legal claims advanced by Republicans appear to be largely sound. Isn't it amazing how you don't hear a lot about this in the activist news? You have to dig for it. Alan Dershowitz, who for a long time was considered to be the premier legal mind in our country. Alan Dershowitz, who is Harvard Law chair or at least some position of leadership in Harvard Law. He was an attorney for the president, of course, during impeachment. Alan Dershowitz has been a long fighter for what he describes as civil rights, as for the disadvantaged. And this is what Dershowitz says. Vice President Biden is not yet the president elect. He has not gotten the 270 certified votes yet. Dershowitz says there are so many contingencies that could occur that anyone who tells you now with 100% certainty they can predict the outcome is not going to be straight with you. Sal and Dershowitz, everybody. Dershowitz spoke for the president during the 2020 impeachment trial, is what it says, and represented a collection of Democrat party voters in Palm beach county who due to a poor ballot design, mistakenly voted for conservative Patrick Buchanan instead of Al gore in the 2000 presidential election. He outloaded this and he outlined the scenario that has, quote, a very small chance of happening involving officials in several states denying Biden at least 37 electors. But he said a perfect storm will have to happen. A vote counting and recounting, narrowing the numbers in three states, and it would require judicial opinions in favor of President Trump. But he said the president's court challenges as Alan Dershowitz could have legal legs in the US Supreme Court, a majority. The high court's justices describe themselves as strict constructionists who are guided by the plain meaning of the U.S. constitution's words as they are commonly understood in 1789. I'm reading from Newsweek.com here. The Constitution gives state legislatures, not judges or other officials, sole power to determine election results rules. In the case of Pennsylvania, the state legislature adopted legislation saying that no ballots received after the closing of election day could be counted. But judges later ruled that they could be. The Supreme Court could overthrow that and side with the Republican led legislature. This is Alan Dershowitz who thinks that the legal challenges are sound. It's funny how that doesn't make its way into the New York Times who says this is a threat and assault on democracy. So here's a question that I don't think enough people have asked. Why don't we have the British system? Why don't we have the French or the Italian system? Why is it in America that we have an election and this kind of uncomfortable, albeit at times clumsy, multi month period before inaugurating the new leader? Why is that? Why is it that we have an election and there's this November, December and January period of potential transition? Why don't we do it like the Brits do or the French or the Germans where they have a parliamentary election and literally the next hour a new prime minister could be sworn in. It's that quick. Whether it be from the resignation of Neville Chamberlain to Winston Churchill taking offense to Boris Johnson filling the seat of Theresa May, that was her name, Theresa May. It happens very quickly. A new government can take over, new prime minister, no transition. Why this multi month waiting period? Because the American system is a federalized system. And this process that is playing out in the courts right now is precisely why the founding Fathers designed a waiting period, a 79 day waiting period. Why 79 days? 79 days allows you to go to the courts and certify state by state, look for fraud, be able to canvass the problems, interview potential witnesses and then come to a conclusive result that is rooted in truth. That's why and this force of the media that is being pushed upon us, that Joe Biden basically should be calling the shots now, is much more European than it is American. And the reason is that the multi month 79 day waiting period is there to make sure we get the result done correctly. Remember, the states created the federal government. The federal government didn't create the states. That a state run system through state legislatures who then send their electors through a federalized system takes time. Every state will go through a different process of counting ballots, of being able to mitigate their differences, of being able to investigate fraud claims. The Founding Fathers recognized this in the Federalist Papers. They wanted this multi month transitional process. They wanted a 79 day window and now we're in the 79 day window and the activist media and the legal intelligentsia that go on television say there's no standing. These claims, mind you, they have not been briefed on the evidence that President Trump has to put in front of courts. They have a couple little soundbites that Rudy Giuliani gave at a press conference. That's a really bad way to come forth and give a verdict. It's really funny because the very same legal minds that we see on TV who are quick to all of a sudden judge President Trump based on his election claims are also really slow. Anytime that there's a high profile murder case that comes across the radar screen of the American public, whether it be OJ Simpson or Casey Anthony, any one of these big high profile cases that go to trial, these legal minds always are like, well, I want to go see all the arguments, I want to see all the evidence. They don't say that when it comes to President Trump. They say, oh, I know exactly, there's no voter fraud. Do you really? Have you heard the witnesses? Have you read every affidavit? Have you looked into the data discrepancies? Are you completely and totally familiar, as if you were a juror or a judge in this process, of exactly what is behind the complaints being put forward by the Trump campaign? No. What is happening here by the New York Times, Washington Post, Huffington Post and all these other news outlets alongside the Democratic elite and the Republican establishment is a growing sense of impatience. We've waited long enough, we've put up with this guy enough. Now it's time to get rid of him. I can't wait any longer. Again, it's how a petulant child would act in 2016. The Trump campaign and those of us that are conservatives and Republicans had to deal with bizarre legal challenges from Jill Stein, from Hillary Clinton and many others that were not very well covered about potential election fraud and interference into the election in Wisconsin and Michigan and Pennsylvania. Just so happens it was a secure election, mostly because there were not mail in ballots coming from every single direction. In Georgia, for example, there were 240,000 more or less ballots. In 2016, might be 260. It's right in that window in 2020, 1.3 million ballots. So here's a really good question that the New York Times should ask, that the Washington Post should ask, but they won't. What assurances were we given by Raffensperger and by Kemp that the Georgia Secretary of State and the election counting process were prepared for a tenfold increase in mail and ballot Requests. So one year ago, one year ago, the Chinese coronavirus was not publicly known. It might have been in our country. We don't know. When it came to our country, some, some very smart minds think it was here as early as about a year ago. But a year ago, Raffensperger and Kemp and these Georgia Republicans had no knowledge whatsoever, or at least they should have had no knowledge whatsoever of a tsunami or a hurricane of mail in ballots. It wasn't until March, April or May did we start to see the rapid escalation and demand of the Democrats that, that we need mail in ballots for every single person. And what resulted was 1.3 million ballots in Georgia, whereas before we had 260,000. Were they ready for that? And when you have that many ballots, of course fraud is gonna happen. You know, many Republicans think that they are going to be in charge if Joe Biden gets inaugurated President of the United States. And these legal challenges end up not being successful. There was an amazing caller who called into Rush Limbaugh, the great Rush Limbaugh, who frames the current status of the Republican Party perfectly. And for any Republican who thinks that things are going to go back to the Chamber of Commerce, open border China appeasement corporate agenda is sadly mistaken. President Donald Trump has changed the Republican Party for better. It is now a party that represents people who shower before work and after work. It is a party that represents the muscular class in this country that is winning record amounts of black and Hispanic voters. And the traditional Republican establishment, they just want to be in power. They want crony corporate deals to be cut. And they couldn't care less about the significant progress that President Donald Trump has achieved for our country. Listen to this singular caller on the Rush Limbaugh show. So incredibly well done. It gives a perfect and accurate picture of where the Republican Party is and where we are headed. Play tape.

Caller (47:20)

We spent our lives voting for these people because they're not them. And we just can't do it anymore. Tired of being stabbed in the back, Rush? It's better to have an enemy that's in front of you than a friend that's behind you that's just going to stab you. We were in Washington on Saturday, me and my 33 year old son. We saw more people than we've ever seen in our lifetime. I have never seen so many people. But were there any Republicans there? No. None. None. No one stands for us, Rush. God forbid, what do we have left? I love my President. This man has given more to this country than anybody and he has no need to none. He's a billionaire. He doesn't need this.

Charlie Kirk (48:12)

And the point that was being made is where were the congressional. Now Louie Gohmert was there. I think Louis Gohmert was at the march. But where were the senatorial and congressional Republicans marching alongside? Many of them want this Trump era to be over. What they don't realize is that President Donald Trump has remade the Republican Party no different than how FDR remade the Democrat Party. The 1930s and 1940s. FDR philosophically changed the Democrat Party for generations. President Donald Trump has done the same. And Madison Cawthorn was there. I have to say, Congressman elect Madison Cawthorn. And for Republicans that want to go back to the days of unifying with the Democrats, they should resign or they should change their party affiliation. Because that caller speaks for millions and millions of people. And this is something that the Republican establishment I hope will learn very quickly is that we tolerate you. We don't support you. It's a very big difference. We tolerate you. And this caller has more wisdom than anything that I have heard or read on most cable television programs in the last couple weeks where he says, I am tired of voting for Republicans cuz they're not them. And by the way, I get that. I think that that's still a moral thing to do. It's the right thing to go vote for a Republican establishment candidate because it's not a Democrat. Fine. But then President Trump comes along and actually does everything he says he's going to do. The wall starts getting built. Iran deal canceled. TPP exited, Paris climate court exited. Peace in the Middle east between Israel, uae, Bahrain and Sudan. China being held accountable. Incredible amounts of redomiciling of manufacturing jobs, best economy in American history. And the Republican establishment looks like fools, and they should because they've been in charge the last 30 or 40 years. And he's fixing those problems. And so I'm starting to see a lot of signs of Republicans start to start to signal that, hey, it's time to move past this Trump moment. It's actually time to do the opposite. He got the second most votes of any candidate in American history. He's the most popular Republican in American history. That's right. He's the most popular electoral Republican in American history. Won more black and Hispanic voters of any candidate running as a Republican since 1960. He won the Rio Grande Valley, which a Republican has not won since 1906. His ideas are incredibly popular. And Republicans pirated. Trump were representing ideas that were increasingly unpopular with Americans. And yet a small subset of DC Ruling elites want him to go away because they can't control him. And we have a little bit of a news flash for those Republicans. Those ideas are here to stay. One of my favorite lies and myths that is told by the media is that there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud. If I would have told you 10 years ago, 15 years ago, that 89,000 people in the Boy Scouts of America would claim that they were sexually abused by people that were involved with the Boy Scouts of America, you'd say, there's no evidence of that. Say, okay, if I would have told you in the 1960s or 1970s that hundreds of members of just the Boston Catholic Church were involved in molesting children, you would have said, there is no evidence of that. If I would have told you 20 years ago that Jeffrey Epstein was involved in trafficking women internationally for the delight of an international ruling class, you would have said, there's no evidence of that. Sit down and shut up. You don't find something unless you start looking into it. This stuff is not like discovering El Dorado where you just stumble across it in the midst of a jungle. You actually have to do investigative work. You have to interview people. You have to have some form of integrity and direction to actually be able to uncover whatever might be happening. And so the chattering class says that our elections are as secure as ever. Mail in. Voting is wonderful, despite the evidence being to the opposite. And let's just look at this logically and rationally. Think about this in your own life. People cheat on everything. People cheat in school. Most of high school, by the way, and most of college is nothing more than how do you cut corners better? How are you able to game the system? It's not about learning, especially in high school. Kids cheat on the SAT exams. People cheat in sports. People cheat in Monopoly. This Thursday Thanksgiving, millions of families will probably open up board games. People will cheat in those board games. People cheat when they drive to work, they run red lights, they ignore signs. People cheat on their taxes all the time. Cheating, the cutting of corners is part of the human condition. People cheat in sports. The New England Patriots probably cheated every once in a while. I'm sure some of our producers here on the Charlie Kirk show really liked that one. The point is that people cheat when it just seems completely and totally inconsequential. A football game is not going to determine the future of the republic. And a football game certainly is not going to determine who is running a $4 trillion government. And so if people cheat on things that are seemingly inconsequential, such as Monopoly or Trivial Pursuit or poker or in traffic to try to get somewhere five minutes faster. Then wouldn't it be logical to assume that when you have 165 million people, more or less, I think it's about 155 million people voted, 160 million that participate in a singular exercise where the prize is not being crowned. The winner of Trivial Pursuit is not getting Monopoly dollars. And it's not being able to say that you won on Thanksgiving evening. It's not even being able to say you got there six minutes faster. The prize is control of a $4 trillion government for four years to control the most powerful military in the history of the planet. Geopolitical decisions that will impact every single country and the future of the Republic. So we're supposed to believe that Americans and human beings cheat everywhere. They cheat on their taxes, they cheat in board games. But when it comes to voting, everyone acts perfectly and ethically, even though the prize is the biggest prize. There's a multi trillion dollar money laundering industry every single year in this country. Guess what? That money laundering industry was never known and it was never revealed until we started looking into it. As the drug trade started to spread throughout the 1970s and 80s in our country, all of a sudden serious investigations were launched. And it's saying, how deep is the cash cleaning industry in America? People that have dirty dollars and want to get them into the American system, multi trillions of dollars is what investigations found. Now, we didn't know that until we started looking into was all suspicion, it was all conjecture. If you'd walk into a random laundromat in New Jersey or a deli in Los Angeles that might be posing as a front for the cartel or for the mob to clean dollars, there's nothing that would lead you to believe that it was necessarily a money laundering outfit. It might just appear that it's normal they're serving product. But until you can look at their books, until you can see the pattern of customers over a longer period of time, you can then could lead to the suspicion that someone actually might be using that as a front to accomplish something criminal. And so we have a pattern of behavior and irregularities that is more than just suspicious. It is pretty evidentiary that this election was stolen, that President Donald Trump, absent to cheating, absent of the cutting of corners, would have been easily elected as the second for a second term of President of the United States. And so we are supposed to believe that the ultimate prize of controlling our government, the CIA, the FBI, the Department of Justice, that people are not going to now organize themselves into criminal units to then be able to win that prize. And the very same sort of deflection tactics that are being used by the activist media and the Democrat Party was being used by the Catholic Church and the Archdiocese of Boston when they started to get looked into for their covering up of their crimes in the 60s and 70s. And I use that example intentionally because it was so taboo to even ask the question that you weren't even allowed to talk about it in the heavily dominant Catholic city of Boston until reporters start to look into it. This idea that we have not have previously undiscovered criminal networks in this country is so incredibly laughable. And people say, well, voting is transparent and it's secure. No, it's not. How do you know who's filling out these ballots when they're flying in from every single direction? When Georgia has 1.3 million ballots and you're not, you're not doing the signature verification that you were doing in previous years, how do you know that? And the answer is, you don't. In fact, it's logical to believe that part of the infrastructure that would try and move drugs, move guns, that would be heavily involved in criminal activity, would also be involved in trying to supplant our elections. We now have whistleblowers that have come out in Wisconsin that have said that all 20 of her clients were forced to vote for Joe Biden. Developmentally disabled clients. As of right now, no FBI investigation into that. We have Facebook posts from the Nevada Native Project that we have, we showed on this program on Friday where the Nevada Native Project was exchanging, literally, a picture of a crime being committed under federal law of a gas card for a ballot. No federal investigation into that. We have sworn affidavits and guests that we've had on this program of military ballots being suspiciously filled out. And also we have heard what the left thinks Donald Trump is. And I've said this before on this program, if I thought Benito Mussolini was, was occupying the White House, I would cheat as well. And part of the strategy of the New York Times and the Washington Post and the intelligentsia in this country that have done such a disservice to the dialogue have been giving people the intellectual permission to cheat. They've been giving people the intellectual permission to cheat by portraying Donald Trump as someone that he isn't. Therefore, millions of people will rise up as if they think they're fighting a 1930s Fuwa, when in reality he's a duly elected president of the United States. Who's the opposite of what they say. The New York Times and the Washington Post have given moral cover fire to any cheating that happened across the country because they'll be able to justify it with themselves as saying, I am participating in the overthrow of an evil man that is no different than someone that would have served in command of the wire marked Wire marked never pronounced that right. Mother Jones, which I think missed their calling being the. The preferred newspaper of Joseph Stalin has just come out. They came out with an article about a year ago. It's amazing. I love using prior pieces of writing from the Stalinistic left against them. So Mother Jones came out with a article that said Researchers assembled over 100 voting machines. Hackers broke into every single one. A cybersecurity exercise highlights both new and unaddressed vulnerabilities riddling US election systems By AJ The Sens. Mother Jones, September 27, 2019. Participants were able to find new ways or replicate previously published methods of compromising every one of the devices. And it's part of this study. It's a report called DEFCON 27 Voting Machine Hacking Village. And it's a really comprehensive report that is covered here by Mother Jones, who very well could be running the Pullet Bureau for the American Left, where it says commercially available voting systems hardware using the United States remains vulnerable to attack. It's the executive summary. It's amazing how the activist media has now completely pivoted away from this. And now so the question should really be why was Mother Jones covering this back in September of 2019? The answer is very clear. The reason why Mother Jones was putting this out into the zeitgeist. The reason why Mother Jones was putting this out into the ether is because Trump was super popular in September of 2019 with a humming economy, with a massive amount of accomplishment, that In September of 2019, Democrats were growing increasingly worried that Trump might win the election legitimately about 14 months from then. And they wanted to start to beat the drum and delegitimize any form of Trump momentum. Now, mind you, this is before the Chinese coronavirus. This is before the lockdowns. So the Democrat narrative prior to the Chinese coronaviruses, Trump's really popular, but not really because our elections can be compromised and that's going to help Trump, when in reality, compromised elections could help anyone. It could help Democrats, help Joe Biden. We also have the MSNBC clip. Can we play that from 2019 of the exact same thing? So, mind you, here you have in Atlanta, I mean, you have the Mother Jones piece. You have the Politico piece that was written a couple years before how you can hack an election in seven minutes or less. And now you have this MSNBC piece. I wanna play that. But just before I do, think about how the Democrats were covering potentially compromised elections and now they don't, now that it doesn't fit their power grabbing narrative. This is not journalism, this is destination narrative based storytelling playtape.

MSNBC Reporter (65:00)

We're among some of the greatest hacking minds in the country. People who've been brought together by, you know, above board companies to try to be as creative as they can and as insidious as they can in attacking systems like you see behind me. These are some of the most common systems used as of 2018 in elections. And so they're here to really test this stuff out. One of the big vulnerabilities we're definitely seeing here is, is just the incredible, the dated nature of this technology. It is extremely old. A lot of it dates from the 90s.

Charlie Kirk (65:33)

So this is MSNBC trying to delegitimize our voting systems in this country. Now all of a sudden they say they're completely secure, we love them, they worked for us, there's no problems, nothing to see here. And again, we've been through this many times in our program, which is how is it that Republicans did so unbelievably well across the country? Better with blacks, better with Hispanics, better in D.C. better in Chicago, better in Beverly Hills. Trump won Beverly Hills. But suddenly the four cities that matter that stopped counting votes all of a sudden were the outliers. Why is that? And why is it that no one's asking that question in the activist news media? Because we all know the answer to that. The activist news media, because of a self reinforcing construct that has been created. They do not see themselves as truth tellers. They don't see themselves as people that are trying to be objective. They have now put on their activist helmet. The activist helmet means I don't care what has to be said, I don't care what has to be done. We got to get rid of this guy. And that's never been the proper role of journalism in this country. And that's exactly why the institutions are crumbling. It's why post Trump they're gonna have a really hard time continuing to keep their profit model going. And I'm gonna tell you exactly how they are gonna do that. It's a longer explanation, but the activist chattering class has now said, we don't care about covering this. And so I want to play some more tape here. Sidney Powell has said that coming very soon we will see some revelations. So I think we have this Sidney Powell clip cut seven. And so where she explains the timeline she expects for her case. Let's play cut seven.

Sidney Powell (67:25)

Well, I don't personally, I don't expect to file anything by Monday. I'm hoping we can get it ready by Wednesday. If not, it should be ready by Friday. But it's a massive project to pull this fraud claim together.

Charlie Kirk (67:39)

But are you saying you're going to file?

Sidney Powell (67:40)

The way the media is going about this is absolutely ridiculous and unreasonable to expect us to put evidence in right now. But I could wait a month to file the fraud case and everybody would have to undo their certifications because it's so bad.

Charlie Kirk (67:54)

And so let me tell you what's going on with Sidney Powell. I think there's been a lot of online chatter saying has the Trump campaign or is the Trump team thrown her under the bus or as they have, they put her out to pasture? I could use any form of one of these statements. Look, Sidney Powell has set the bar very, very high. And I am going to give Sidney Powell time and space to begin to make her argument, especially in front of a court. With that being said, I am not alone in this. I think it is time for Sidney Powell to start to pepper the narrative, start to tease us with what she has. I think it is time for Sidney Powell to go public with what she can reveal. And let me tell you why. The court of public opinion in the narrative war is just as important at times as the jury court or as the deliberation in front of a judge. Winning the New York Times over is never going to happen, but winning the Wall Street Journal over will. Winning over some of these center right publications is critically important. And Sidney Powell has set the bar very high where she believes that Joe Biden will have to disband his presidential transition team and Trump will send us a serve a second term. Let me be very clear. I am cheering for her enthusiastically because I believe that if Sidney Powell is given the space to be able to make her argument with the right evidence, that can be a very, very effective form of reasoning and potentially give Donald Trump a second term. I want to play tape here, more around Sidney Powell and I want to build out more of this because it's very important. I think we have another Sidney Powell tape. Or there was one. Yeah, yeah. Okay. Can I play cut 16 please? Can we play cut 16? That'd be helpful.

Sidney Powell (69:50)

This cannot go on Our votes must be counted fair and true. Every legal vote is entitled to be counted. And every illegal vote nullifies the vote of an American citizen and our public will of we the people. It's absolutely counter to everything this country was founded on. So we have got to get this fixed now. We can't. I can't unsee it. I'll tell you that. I certainly cannot unsee what I have seen. And I'm going to make sure everybody else knows everything I've seen too. Because we've got to hold our government institutions accountable.

Charlie Kirk (70:25)

And she cannot unsee what she has seen. Again, Sidney Powell is not. She does not bluff. She does not go in front of the American people and bluster without evidence. Let's play cut 17 of Sidney Powell saying she has much more evidence than hundreds of thousands of people. You'll hear her play cut 17. And when you lay all this out and you're gonna do this in court, do you have what you think is irrefutable evidence that will make up the minds of millions of American people?

Sidney Powell (70:53)

Frankly, with everything we've got, these should be criminal prosecutions at a significant level. There are hundreds of thousands of people in our criminal system right now in prison who were convicted on far less evidence of guilt than we have here.

Charlie Kirk (71:12)

Wow. That. There are hundreds of thousands of people that were already convicted with far less pieces of evidence of guilt that we have here. So here's my take on Sidney Powell. I think that she should be given the space and the trust because she's earned her trust with what she's done with Michael Flynn and the exposing of this 302s and Peter struck stroke smirk and all of that. That she should be given trust that she has what she says she has. With that being said, I think it is time to ask Signi Powell to start to reveal or tease or show parts of what she is sitting on. Because there are 30 to 40 million people that have their hopes up right now. And if 30 or 40 million people are going to be endlessly strung out for the next couple months and then let down, seriously, when Joe Biden might get inaugurated as the next President United States, that's not a healthy way to handle this either. And if Sidney Powell is correct and we have no reason to believe that Sidney Powell would be lying to us, she doesn't have a track record of that, then this would be, as Tucker Carlson said, the largest political scandal in American history. It would be. And so Sidney Powell has earned a couple weeks of us waiting for her to lay out the lawsuits and lay out the evidence. And also in a lawsuit complaint, there

Sidney Powell (72:46)

is

Charlie Kirk (72:48)

opportunity in the complaint to provide, at least on the surface, what evidence you are going to supply to the court. So people are asking@freedomarlikerk.com why is she no longer on the Trump legal team? It is my opinion that she wants to act on her own timing in her own capacity. And the Trump legal team is going to focus much more on signature verification and process. Whereas Sidney Powell is going for the grand slam, bases loaded, ninth inning, two outs, game seven, World Series. She's going for the big hit that could reverse everything. And I really hope she's right. And if Sidney Powell ends up not being able to prove this, she will have some explaining to do because she has said in no uncertain terms that she thinks that Joe Biden will have to disband his entire transition team. Those are fighting words. Let's just be honest. Right? That's those are big level claims. I want to get to some of our questions, but first I want to thank some of you that are supporting us at charliekirk.com/support. Barbara from Virginia, thank you. Tamila from Alabama, thank you. Teresa from Kansas, thank you. Kim from North Carolina, thank you. Big monthly supporter, thank you. Barbara from Kalispell, thank you. Trish from Louisiana, New Orleans. Nolan's, thank you. Veronica from New York, thank you. Josiah from Texas, thank you. This is all@charliekirk.com Support Frank from California, thank you. Marianne from Maine, thank you. And if you support on a monthly basis, we have private zoom meetings with all of our monthly supporters@charliekirk.com support where you can ask me questions live. We're also getting questions about do you think that Sidney Powell has the evidence? We don't know. But also I think that we should allow this process to play out that Sidney Powell being in the justice system, being from a former prosecutorial background and dealing with this, I don't think she would be saying this stuff as a complete bluff. I don't. I think that she does have something that she might have, whistleblowers and hard evidence that would reinforce her claims. And after the heroic work that she has done with Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, I think she more than has deserved our trust to wait and see what she has done. But I also say this and I cushion that statement with this. She has set the expectations very high. I do know people that have texted me saying where's the bombshell? Where's the bombshell? And I'm hearing from sources internally that should be coming soon And I'm hearing from other people that are saying we don't know if it's going to happen. And I think that might be part of the schism that is happening right now. And time will really tell. Email us your questions freedomcharliekirk.com and please subscribe to the Charlie Kirk Show Podcast. Take out your phone, please, and take out. If you have an iPhone, there's an Apple podcast app. It's purple. Just click on that purple podcast app, type in Charlie Kirk show hit subscribe, give us a five star review. If you screenshot that subscription and email it to us freedomarliekirk.com we will pick three people that I will send a signed copy of the MAGA doctrine, the subscriptions on the podcast side, and also you guys hitting that bell and that subscribe on YouTube helps us keep going. We are staying on top of all of this news, everybody. It's more important than ever that we are relentless and that we are investigative in nature. It's Thanksgiving week, but we are in the chair diving deep, doing the work that matters. I will answer this question right here. Is it possible that there is a disinformation campaign against Sidney Powell? I would not, I would not put it past foreign actors from trying to discredit and trying to debase the amazing work that so many patriots are doing to uncover all this election fraud. And we are working at actually trying to platform some whistleblowers that might have some very, very, very big information. And you guys make that possible at Charlie Kirk. You guys can reach me directly freedomarliekirk.com with any questions you have or things that you are thinking about or you want us to cover. Thank you guys for watching. We'll be back very soon. God bless you guys. Thanks so much for listening, everybody. If you want to get involved with Turning Point usa, where we play offense with a sense of urgency to win America's culture war. And if you want to come down to our big conference in Palm beach in just about a month, it's tpusa.com sas. That's tpusa.com SAS. Email us your questions. Freedom at charliekirk. Com. Please consider supporting us at charliekirk. Com Support. Thanks so much for listening. Talk to you soon. God bless.