Loading summary
Chris Cuomo
I now know what's going to happen in the presidential election. I do. I know that's a heady thing to say, but we have seen a repeated cycle long enough for me to tell you what I think is going to happen in this election. I'm Chris Cuomo. Welcome to the Chris Cuomo Project. Now, the only game I'm playing with you here is I'm saying what will happen, not necessarily who will win. But I believe this is just as instructive a point. Because if you're going to follow the race, what matters most, what has taken so long, and I'll explain why in this election cycle is to distill, to isolate, to identify. What is this race about? What is it turning on? That's why we always love the October surprise. Why? Because we are desperate as consumers and arbiters and sellers and marketers of our politics to make it about something specific. This peccadillo, this allegation, these hostages, this war, this tax policy, something that defines what brought the most people out to vote for or against that proposition. And I now know what that proposition is. Who will win? The candidate that gets more people to believe in their side of the following proposition. One more step into context of why I think this. Why are the polls so freaky tight within the margin of error all over the place? Why are places that are assumed like Iowa to be a blow away Republican win? Why is the margin shrinking? Well, part of it is that Trump has been trying his damnedest to lose. Right now I believe the election is his to lose and I'll explain why in a second. But not that he definitely will win, but that he has an advantage based on the state of play that he is intent on blowing. This guy, had someone shoot him in the head and did not expand his base. This man just had another guy poke an AK47 at him within two months and he misplayed it. That's on him because he is missing the proposition of what this election is about. The polls are very tight because we have about bottomed out in the two party reductive battle to the bottom. Everything is about dividing us. Everything is us, them. Why it works for the parties. Why is Kamala Harris pitch to you? Trump is a threat to democracy. It's another way of saying he is worse fear him. Okay, why is Trump's allegation she's a commie socialist isn't even enough anymore. Full commie. Ironic that he also defends Putin at the same time. Yes, because what does it instruct you to? It instructs you to the point that this is bullshit. He doesn't really. He's not really afraid of communism because if he were, he'd hate Putin. You see what I'm saying? So what is it? It's a way of saying, she's worse. And that's why we're divided, because that's all you're being conditioned to. So of course the polls are going to be really tight. It's a binary proposition. And it's not like love versus hate, where you would hope that love would manifest itself in a majority, right? This is. Which is worse. It is inherently negative. It's a suggestion of relative suckiness. So of course it's going to be really tight. You want a pea sandwich or a poo sandwich? I don't want to really pick either of those. This is where it takes you. Now, here's the proposition that will determine this election. It is ready. Enragement versus engagement. Those are the dueling propositions. Okay? Explain enragement. If this is a straight grievance election, look at our history. I think it's. 10 out of 46 presidents haven't won a second term, assuming they weren't killed. You see almost in every case, that the overwhelming atmosphere of the election was negativity about what was going on. That was wrong. Let's take a recent example. Trump blew it on the pandemic, okay? Blew. It was unrelentingly chaotic. And, you know, the mendacity factor, the lying, he created an atmosphere of such toxicity that he was doomed to the same Carter. The economy, gas prices, the hostage crisis, bad, bad, bad atmosphere of negativity, of grievance. Now, you could say, yeah, but there's always grievance in an election. Of course, grievance is always an aspect of a campaign, but it's about how dominant is it, okay? And if this election stays about grievance, what people are afraid of, what they're angry about, this is Trump's election to lose. Now, why don't I say Trump wins one? Because I don't know which of these two propositions is going to win out, and it could go either way. And frankly, Trump has the easier burden to carry because we are in a really negative space. We are dominated by the social media dynamic, which is magnified fringe voices, and they are by definition angry. Okay? Animus is the rule, okay? Not the exception. So it is his to lose. Now, he is trying his damnedest to lose. Why? Because he's trying his damnedest to isolate and concentrate his base. Everything he's Doing is almost designed to not appeal to independent, undecided voters. He's almost impossibly negative and irrational and what he is prescribing to fix things. I'm going to round up all illegal people in this country, everyone who's here illegally. Nobody believes you can do that. Nobody believes you should do that. Not really. Not independents, not critical thinkers. And I'm not saying that that means you're about open borders. That stupid, reductive battle to the bottom, zero sum bullshit. Just because I don't think you should round up or try to round up 11 million people. It's also called declaring war. Doesn't mean I'm for open borders. Who would be for open borders? The Pope. Great, let him stay in Rome. That's not what we're about here. You gotta have borders. It's gotta be secure. It's not fair to the people coming across otherwise, and it's not fair to the people who are already here. It's not fair to what we want to be about as a country. But grievance is the rule of the day. And as such, Trump has the advantage, which is why the polls are so close. This man has no business being in the hunt for the presidency of this country. He has done everything wrong that you can do, okay? And yet he is right there. Why? Power of grievance. The power of people's disaffection and desperation to disrupt what they hate. To use a word I do not like, hate that word, hate. That's. That's the secret. By the way, I should probably do a whole podcast on this. You gotta stop thinking that the people who support Trump are like Trump, that they speak like Trump, that they act like Trump. They don't. They want to hire Trump to do a dirty job. They want him to be a virus to the political corpus. They want him to disrupt, to destroy, to demean those that they disrespect and dislike, the system that they distrust and despise. They want someone to do what they believe has been done to them and that they cannot do themselves. That's why they don't care that he exhibits terrible behavior because they're putting him into a terrible place. If you're sending somebody into the jungle, do you really care if they're a savage? You see what I'm saying? And you have to understand it that way. You may not agree, you may not accept, you may not like, but that's what it is. And if it stays grievance, if it's about enragement, and that's why this guy responds to someone pointing an AK47 at him by trying to get people to do the same thing to his opponent. Who does that? Somebody who believes in outrage and enraging people in grievance. That's what he's about. Look, even his slogan Make America great again. What does that mean? We're not great, he says. This is a failing country. I disagree 100%, but I'm also not running for office. I'm just saying that I believe his rhetoric alone should disqualify him, but not if we are overwhelmed with an atmosphere of grievance. Support for the Chris Cuomo Project comes from Oracle. Even if you think it's a bit overhyped, and I don't, AI is going to be all over. Whether it's self driving cars, molecular medicine, business efficiency anywhere. AI needs a lot of speed and computing power. So how do you compete without costs? Going crazy? Time to upgrade to the next generation of the cloud Oracle Cloud Infrastructure OCI OCI is blazing fast and it's a secure platform for your infrastructure, your database, application development, plus all your AI and machine learning workloads. OCI costs 50% less for computing and 80% less for networking, so you're going to save money. Thousands of businesses have already upgraded to oci, including MGM Resorts, Specialized Bikes and Fireworks AI, and they're offering to cut your current cloud bill in half if you move to OCI for new US customers with minimum financial commitment. Offer ends 1231 24. See if your company qualifies for this special offer. Just go to oracle.com CCP for the Chris Cuomo Project Support for the Chris Cuomo project comes from 120life. I've already told you I believe in this because we have high blood pressure in my family and we have gotten it under control. And part of the reason is 120 Life. 120 Life helps you manage blood pressure. And by the way, it's not just for high blood pressure. It's also beneficial for those with diabetes. It's a very valuable tool for overall health. It's endorsed by hundreds of doctors, trusted by healthcare professionals, hundreds of doctors recommending it. It provides visible, measurable changes in blood pressure. How do you know? You just use a simple monitor. You can buy one at the drugstore and you track it yourself for a limited time. If you try 120Life, you will save 20% off. Use the code CHRIS20 at checkout at 120Life.com 120Life offers a risk free trial with a Full refund if you don't see lower numbers in just two weeks. Two weeks, you get your money back. How do you lose? And it tastes good, so it's not like you're going to not enjoy the process. Go to 120-L I F E.com and use the code CHRIS20, and you get 20 off. There's nothing to lose except your high blood pressure numbers. Go to 120life.com and use the code CHRIS20. You get 20% off and free shipping. Today, support for the Chris Cuomo project comes from Ground News information overload. Look, man, we're getting from all directions all the time on social media. You don't know what's true, you don't know what's exaggerated. You don't know what's consistent. You don't know the source. You need Ground News. Ground News is a website and an app that helps you make sense of the news by aggregating, curating. Okay, Organizing related articles from around the world in one place so you can compare coverage. You compare how outlets from left, center, and right cover the same story so you get factuality. Also, you can spot bias and sensationalism with the help of the app. Go to groundnews.com Chris. You get 40% off the ground News Vantage plan. What does that do? It unlocks access to all of their features. I think this is a genuinely cool, essential tool in today's world. They're doing important work and I hope you'll check them out. That's groundnews.g r o u n d news enragement versus engagement. Notice I'm not going dark versus light. Why? I don't see it that way. It's not good versus evil. It's not love versus hate. That's not really what it is. Because there are a lot of people who are voting for Trump who absolutely love this country, who absolutely believe in love, who do not want hate, who don't condone, to use a stupid word that we love in politics, who are not about evil. They're not bigots, they're not prejudiced, they're desperate for better, and they think everything is rigged and dirty. So that's not what it is. It's enragement versus engagement. Meaning what? That you get more people that prefer the proposition of doing something about it that seems calculated to possibly get us to a better place? Because people aren't stupid. They know it's all about Congress. They know that in reality, neither of these people probably make a huge difference to your life. You'll say it now during campaign season, but if you look at Republicans and Democrats, not only are many of our preconceptions false, but the needle just doesn't move that way much in either direction. You know, it turned out well. Democrats, you know, they're going to tax and spend well. The economy, the stock market, the job market. Absolutely, 100%. You cannot say I'm wrong to suggest that Democrats have not been worse on those two metrics than Republicans. And almost every indicia that you're going to look to as a collection of factors shows that it does better under Democrats. Why? You'll get varying ideas about that. They expand government, they put more money to the economy, whatever. Whatever you want to explain it or rationalize it or excuse it as. So what we say during the election doesn't really translate into what happens in the governance. Right. That's why my father loved the expression, you campaign in poetry, you govern in prose. Meaning what? You talk shit now and then you do what you have to do, which may not be what you were talking shit about. Engagement is getting more people, specifically independents, to believe that Harris has a chance of making things better. Wait a minute. Why doesn't that apply to Trump? Because that's not really his sell. What are you saying? Great again. But inherently, he is about harnessing the outrage and anger towards what is. He does not really have great plans, plausible plans, likely plans to get to better rounding up immigrants. It's not going to improve our situation any more than the wall would in terms of something that's really feasible, plausible, that's going to happen. Our economy, another tax cut. I mean, if you don't target it the right way, like he did the last time, and you couple it with grotesque spending, as he did, that's not going to get us to a better place. Just look at the numbers of his last election. Well, but he's going to lower gas prices. That's a promise. It's not a probability. Certainly not the way he's saying drill, baby, drill. I've explained to you numerous times, we are not drill, baby, drill away from lower gas prices. We don't have that much control over our domestic market. It's a world market. We're already drilling more than we ever have. Most of the restrictions they're talking about are on public lands, not private lands. Private lands are fracking and doing all these other things at record levels, so much so that the producers, the suppliers are cutting back because the price is already coming down for crude. Just look it up. Crude oil prices are coming Down. So what are suppliers going to do? They're going to make less. Why? Because that's how you enhance the demand supply ratios. So he's just feeding you a fiction enragement. I'm really off about this. Everything is wrong. We must punish engagement. I'm going to pick somebody who I think is going to lower the temperature and try and get us to a better place. Now, is Harris that not as much as Biden was in the last election. Why? Because everything about him spoke to less. Less drama, less crazy, less talk, less. Which is what we wanted. Okay. And interestingly, Trump is proof of concept here. That was a grievance election. People wanted punishment for the administration and they got it. Will that be what they want now? Well, militating in favor of that, you have some low level culture war fruit, but I don't really think that matters. You have pain in the pocketbook. And yes, there is a story to be told that we're doing better in terms of most other places, major economies recovering or not recovering from the pandemic. But do you really care if at the end of the day things cost more? Probably not. And that's something that Harris has to deal with and in a real way, which is why they're pushing the Trump is a despot thing, because they're trying to make something more important than your pocketbook. And I don't know that that works. And I don't know that they should even be playing at it, frankly, because I don't think they beat Trump in a battle to the bottom of grievance. I do not think they win that the he's a despot versus you're a commie. I think she loses and not because I think she's a commie. I think that's absurd. I also think the idea that he's a despot is absurd. I don't think he has the strategy or the ambition or the intelligence to be a despot. I don't think he does. I think he just wants to win because he thinks that's cool. I don't believe that it's about patriotism and getting things done. Look at his last administration. He had plenty of chances to prove that he could transcend politics, that he could be different, that he couldn't. That he would change the money, he would drain the swamp. He did none of those things. So enragement versus engagement, that is the proposition that will determine this election. We're not a peccadillo away. We're not a scandal away. We're past that. We're so exhausted by the flaws and failures after Cancel Culture and MeToo and all of the investigations and the impeachments and the trials and the prosecutions and the race baiting and the murders and the policing and everything, everything is so bad. And it's always a new bad thing. The wars, we're exhausted. We're exhausted by it. Now that is a double edged sword. On the one side, then there must be an opportunity for somebody to come in and pitch something else that makes you feel relief and get you to a better place. Yeah. But you're also conditioned to that negative space. It's where you are, it's where your head is, it's what you see all around you. Social media, it's the media, it's the politicians. Guy points a gun at Trump, he says, this is on the Democrats for saying, I'm a threat to the democracy. By the way, they're their threat to the democracy. Who does that? If it's wrong that they're doing that to you, why would you just do it to them? Because I do to them what they do to me. That's enragement. That's enragement. Look, we see the Democrats playing that in. My response to Trump having a gun pointed at him again and saying, we gotta be better than that, that I don't like what comes out of his face. I think it is beneath what we should expect from a president. I think it's disqualifying for him in the presidency and I find it unlikable in substance and in his person. But the idea that someone would want to take him out and that so many of you, thousands of you, responded by saying, he deserves it. You're no better than what you oppose. You're no better than what you oppose. And you will lose this election on that basis. Who hates who more you lose, who can change what people actually matter about? That's the space for Democrats to win. Support for the Chris Cuomo project comes from Radioactive media. Business owners, CMOs gotta grow, right? How? How is the question. People plateau pretty easily on social media. I'm one of them. Online efforts, sometimes they start right, but all of a sudden they go wrong. Why not tap into podcasts, why not tap into radio? What do we know? In the US audio reaches more than 270 million people every week. That's more than social media and digital combined. My friends at Radioactive Media, they know the recipe to launch, optimize and scale performance by building compelling audio campaigns. And those campaigns can work. They got a personal approach. They Know the medium in a way that few others can match. For advertisers who want to reach the right audience with the right hosts and programs, you got to speak with Radioactive Media. Learn how you can experience the power of audio marketing by utilizing the strength of text messaging as well as audio message integration. And as a result of combining, you generate a return on investment as high as 7 to 1. Now I'll give you a little bit of a deal. Text my name Chris to 5115 11. Heck, you can even buy spots on my show. All right. If you're a mid sized company or a well funded startup with a monthly budget as low as five figures, Radioactive Media can help. They believe in the power of radio so much, they even use it themselves right here, right now. Right? That's what's happening here is I'm promoting them for helping me. Text my first name Chris. Chris to 511-511- Chris to 511-511 or you can do it on the web. Go to Radioactive Media.com text rates. Sure, it's worth it. Support for the Chris Cuomo project comes from Shopify. Now here's why we all need this. I'm trying to sell my free agent gear, right? But how? How do I get it out to people? How do I make sure that it is an efficient and accelerated process to manage my inventory, the transactions and just where I'm putting them and how I'm getting them? That's Shopify. Shop pay is their product and it boosts conversions, meaning the rate of people seeing my offer to buy versus actually transacting. They can boost it up to 50%, meaning way less carts going abandoned. So upgrade your business and get the same checkout untuck it uses. Sign up for your $1 a month trial period at shopify.com Chris C all lowercase Chris C. Go to shopify.com Chris C. Upgrade your selling today where shopify.com Chris and I'll give you one more insight into why I'm so confident about this now. What we saw in the switch from Biden to Harris. Once you get past the theatricality of how Democrats just found religion on Kamala Harris when they didn't have a nice thing to say about her six months before Biden dropped out. People get distracted by that. That's politics. What are they supposed to do? Not back their own person, not lionize their own person, not exaggerate the virtues of their own person. Right? The Republicans didn't do the same thing with Trump. You heard Governor Sununu of New Hampshire, say on television 100 times, including on my show at News Nation. Look, I don't like the guy. I don't want to vote for him, but I'm not voting for the Democrat. That's the binary battle to the bottom. It's disgusting. I'm not saying Sununu is. I actually believe he's a face of our future. But that's the game. That's why I hate the game. I don't hate people. I don't do that. I don't invest any kind of energy in that. Doesn't do anything for me. It doesn't serve me well. You make your own choices. But I can hate ideas, I can hate propositions. So I hate that. But what happened when Biden got out? Why did Harris get the spike? Because of what I'm describing as this dual proposition, enragement versus engagement. There were a lot of people who didn't want to vote for Trump but could not vote for Biden. Why? He was not engaging them. It's not enough to beat Trump by having people vote against something. And yes, I know this is a trickier, higher bar, especially in a society that is consumed with negativity. I know. I'm not saying it's fair. My therapist says fair is the only four letter word. I think he's right, but I still think it's the reality. And when Harris came in, she got a bump. Why? Because people are desperate to vote for a black woman in America for president. I don't buy that. I think it's despite it, not because of it. And look, we can talk about that. The idea that race doesn't play a role in our politics I think is nonsense. I think the fact that race isn't a sensitivity that compels judgment by way too many Americans is nonsense. Of course it is. So why would she get the bump? Well, because people want to default to engagement. They want somebody who they believe has a chance to make a difference in a positive way. This is America, okay? It's not Venezuela, it's not the Middle east where people can cotton to despots and to harshness. It's not us. We don't like bullies. I mean, we like strength and we like aggression and we like things like that, but we like sweet strength. We want to be the good guys. We don't take solace in being the bad guys. Not yet, anyway. It was because she represents engagement. And that energized a group of people who were basically sitting it out or not sure what to do. Because Biden wasn't doing that. And she represents that fair. Unfair. Right. Wrong. True. Not true. This is for the voters to decide. But as a proposition, enragement versus engagement will determine this election. What choice more people make in the places that matter. Because remember, we're within the margin of error overall, which is very scary to the Democrats. Why? If Democrats don't win the popular vote by 3 to 4 points, they don't win the election. I know it's not based on the popular vote. Spare me your attacks. But historically, again, look it up. If Democrats don't win by three or four, because look, Hillary Clinton beat Donald Trump in the popular vote. She got crushed in the Electoral College. We're not changing that system ever, let alone between now and the election. So it is what it is. Being in a dead heat with Trump is bad for Harris. Now, could this be a different election where it's so tight overall, but she wins by a nudge in the places that matter? Yeah, it could be. And I have not seen that in my time covering elections. Quarter century. This could be that. Why? Because every once in a while you have a black swan event. Every once in a while you have an outlier. Every once in a while you have an aberration. Every once in a while you have something that is different than the norms. It happens. It's one of the beauties of democracy. It's not fixed right. And you're within the margin of error in all the places that matter. So this is very tight. And the proposition is going to come down to which choice do more people make in the places that matter? Enragement. I'm pissed off. And I want that to be known and felt by the people in power now, which is Harris or I choose to engage and I want to put somebody in there who isn't just a loud mouth echoing every kind of animus he can think of. I want somebody who's got a chance of working with other people and figuring something out. And she is more of that than he is. And I'm there. And if independents who are undecided, because I believe one of two groups swings this election, independents who are undecided, that could go either way. I think Harris should have an edge with them. And we're seeing that in the polling, but we'll see. Or women en masse. Now, we are not seeing that. Even though she has gotten a bump with women, I don't know yet if there are enough married women who will vote on the basis of having had a right, a protection taken from them. With the Dobbs decision. And yes, Trump hurt himself again. He's trying to lose this election by saying that women and Democrats wanted Roe taken away. I don't know who told him that, but that is dumb for him to be saying. If they decide, if women decide, a majority of our population, a majority of our voting population to make their witness on that issue, Trump is done. But I don't know that that's what happens. It is an explanation for what happened in the midterms in 2022. But what I am sure of is the proposition that will determine this election. Is the country in the mood for enragement or engagement? What do you think? I'm Chris Cuomo. Thank you for subscribing and following the Chris Cuomo Project. Thank you for joining the substack subscribing. Five bucks a month. Get the podcast first. Get it ad free. Get my doctor, Dr. Robin Rose, telling you about Long Covid, how to treat it at home, what you can do to increase your longevity and the quality of your fitness. What I'm doing for myself my walk and talks about what I've learned about philosophy and what I do and don't practice, which hopefully you'll do better than I do. All there for five bucks a month. That's a deal. And I'll see you on News Nation 8p and 11p every weekday night. Thank you for the support you've shown to me there and everywhere. I appreciate you. I'm doing this with you and I'm doing it for you. So let's get after it.
The Chris Cuomo Project: What Will Determine the 2024 Election
Episode Release Date: October 24, 2024
In this episode of The Chris Cuomo Project, host Chris Cuomo delves into his prediction for the 2024 presidential election. He posits that the election will hinge on a fundamental proposition: enragement versus engagement. Cuomo asserts, “What will determine this election is whether the country is in the mood for enragement or engagement” (00:00).
Cuomo examines the unusually tight polls surrounding the election, attributing this phenomenon to the entrenched two-party system's focus on division and negativity. He notes, “Everything is us, them. Why it works for the parties” (05:30). This divisive approach has led to a polarized electorate, making the race more competitive within the margin of error.
A significant portion of the discussion centers on former President Donald Trump’s influence on the election dynamics. Cuomo criticizes Trump’s handling of various crises, including his response to an assassination attempt, stating, “This man has no business being in the hunt for the presidency of this country. He has done everything wrong that you can do” (12:15). He argues that Trump’s strategy has been to isolate and concentrate his base rather than appeal to independent or undecided voters. This approach, according to Cuomo, inadvertently sets Trump up to lose because the electorate is saturated with negativity: “This is Trump's election to lose” (15:45).
Shifting focus to the Democratic side, Cuomo discusses Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign strategy, which emphasizes engagement over grievance. “She represents engagement. And that energized a group of people who were basically sitting it out or not sure what to do” (25:10). Unlike Trump’s approach, Harris aims to present positive solutions and engage voters who are weary of constant negativity, positioning her as a candidate capable of working collaboratively to address the nation’s challenges.
Cuomo highlights the critical role of independent voters and women in deciding the election outcome. He believes that Harris has an edge with independents who seek a constructive alternative, stating, “Harris should have an edge with them” (35:20). Additionally, he touches on the influence of female voters, particularly those affected by the Dobbs decision on Roe v. Wade, suggesting that their choices could significantly impact the election results.
Drawing from historical precedents, Cuomo reflects on how negative atmospheres in past elections have influenced incumbent losses. “10 out of 46 presidents haven't won a second term, assuming they weren't killed” (45:00). He uses these examples to bolster his argument that a climate of grievance typically disadvantages incumbents, yet notes Trump’s current unique position where his base's anger could paradoxically work against him.
In wrapping up, Cuomo reiterates that the 2024 election will ultimately be decided by whether voters choose enragement—a continued focus on grievances and negativity—or engagement, seeking positive change and collaborative solutions. “The proposition that will determine this election is: Is the country in the mood for enragement or engagement?” (60:00). He calls on voters to reflect on what they truly desire for the country’s future, emphasizing that this fundamental choice will shape the election's outcome.
Notable Quotes:
This comprehensive analysis by Chris Cuomo offers listeners an in-depth look into the critical factors shaping the 2024 presidential election. By focusing on the core proposition of enragement versus engagement, Cuomo provides a framework for understanding the complex dynamics at play, making it a valuable listen for anyone seeking to grasp the underlying currents of this pivotal electoral race.