Ian Bremmer Breaks Down How Trump’s Return Is Reshaping Global Power

Summary

The Chris Cuomo Project: Ian Bremmer Breaks Down How Trump’s Return Is Reshaping Global Power

Release Date: March 18, 2025

Hosts:

• Chris Cuomo: Award-winning veteran broadcast journalist and host of The Chris Cuomo Project.
• Ian Bremmer: Political scientist, founder of Eurasia Group, and renowned expert on global affairs.

---

Introduction

In this compelling episode of The Chris Cuomo Project, Chris Cuomo engages in an insightful conversation with global affairs expert Ian Bremmer. The discussion centers on the ramifications of Donald Trump’s resurgence in American politics and its profound effects on global power structures.

---

Trump’s Impact on the Global Order

Timestamp: [04:06]

Bremmer elucidates how Trump symbolizes a broader disintegration of the United States’ commitment to its established global order. He states:

“Trump is the principal symptom and beneficiary of a breakdown in how people think about the US Political system... we’re now unwinding that order that is utterly unique, that has never happened in our lives before. And it's gonna create enormous chaos all around the world.”
– Ian Bremmer [04:08]

This shift includes a retreat from collective security, alliances, global free trade, and the promotion of democracy—all pillars that have historically underpinned American influence worldwide.

---

U.S. Isolation and Its Global Consequences

Timestamp: [05:14]

Bremmer discusses the fundamental U.S. policy change under Trump:

“The basic assumption is less involvement, more resources at home, less exposure, Better for America.”
– Bremmer [05:14]

He warns that this inward focus not only damages America's global standing but also negatively impacts other nations reliant on U.S. support.

---

Trump’s Disruptive Policies

Timestamp: [06:25]

Bremmer acknowledges the core elements of Trump’s rhetoric that resonate with many Americans feeling disenfranchised:

“There is core of truth, as you know, Chris, in so much of what he says... when you take a chainsaw to things that you have built up... that will have significant long term, unintended consequences which will hurt us.”
– Bremmer [06:25]

He emphasizes that while Trump addresses legitimate grievances about the political system's corruption, his aggressive dismantling of established institutions leads to widespread instability.

---

Erosion of U.S. Alliances, Especially with Europe

Timestamp: [12:18]

A pivotal part of the conversation focuses on the deterioration of U.S.-European relations:

“Trump just made these latest announcements on the new tariffs. We're going to hit the Canadians in the face with our closest friends...we are making them into an adversary.”
– Bremmer [12:18]

Bremmer argues that such actions undermine longstanding alliances, making traditional partners like Canada and European nations wary and resentful.

“The Europeans as a whole... I’ve never seen any level of damage close to what Trump has managed in his first 50 days, second term.”
– Bremmer [41:30]

He contends that Trump's approaches—ranging from trade wars to unilateral decisions on international conflicts—have irreparably harmed trust and cooperation.

---

Russia-Ukraine Conflict and U.S. Strategy

Timestamp: [27:52]

The episode delves into the Ukraine-Russia conflict, analyzing Trump's strategy and its implications:

“Our political system is inherently corrupted by... money... there's a chasm between Main Street and Wall Street.”
– Bremmer [12:43]

Bremmer critiques Trump's handling of the Ukraine situation, suggesting that his focus on transactional deals with adversaries like Russia compromises long-term strategic interests.

“We are now run by a leadership that actually has some fundamentally different values than a lot of European leaders do.”
– Bremmer [38:50]

This divergence in values further strains alliances and diminishes the United States' ability to lead effectively on the global stage.

---

China as a Principal Adversary

Timestamp: [52:49]

Bremmer highlights the rising threat of China, contrasting it with the Soviet Union:

“A China that actually isn't the Soviet Union, they're smaller economy than we are... their ability to actually create world-changing technology is at our level.”
– Bremmer [52:49]

He underscores the necessity for the U.S. to recognize China as a serious competitor and invest strategically to maintain its global dominance.

---

Media and Societal Polarization

Timestamp: [53:59]

The discussion shifts to internal American issues, particularly media influence and societal divisions:

“We increasingly don't in any way agree on basic truths because we never did.”
– Bremmer [54:03]

Bremmer criticizes the fragmentation of information and the role of media algorithms in exacerbating polarization, leading to a society where consensus on fundamental issues is unattainable.

---

Impact on Young Americans and Capitalism

Timestamp: [63:56]

Bremmer addresses the disenfranchisement of young men in America:

“42% of young men in the United States believe that it is fully justified to break the law as leader of the United States in order to get the outcomes you want... that's a problem.”
– Bremmer [62:14]

He connects this sentiment to broader systemic failures within capitalism, arguing for reforms that ensure corporations bear responsibility for their societal impacts and that economic systems support rather than exploit the average American.

---

Concluding Thoughts

Timestamp: [64:33]

Bremmer and Cuomo wrap up the discussion by reflecting on the multifaceted challenges posed by Trump’s policies:

“Trump is a winner. He's always been a winner. For him, right? And for him to be a winner, others have to be losers.”
– Bremmer [30:09]

Bremmer emphasizes the need for authentic leadership that prioritizes national and global well-being over personal or political victory, advocating for a unified approach to restore America's standing and address internal divisions.

---

Key Takeaways

• Erosion of Global Trust: Trump's policies have significantly undermined America's traditional alliances, particularly with Europe, leading to diminished global influence and increased chaos.

• Transactional vs. Strategic Leadership: Bremmer criticizes Trump's transactional approach, which prioritizes immediate gains over long-term strategic interests, especially concerning adversaries like Russia and China.

• Internal Divisions and Media Influence: The fragmentation of American society, fueled by media algorithms and polarized narratives, poses a substantial threat to national cohesion and effective governance.

• Economic and Generational Disenfranchisement: There is a pressing need to address systemic issues within capitalism to support disenfranchised groups, particularly young men, and to reform corporate accountability.

---

Notable Quotes

• Bremmer on U.S. Isolation:

  “We are now undoing that order that is utterly unique... it’s going to create enormous chaos all around the world.”
  – Ian Bremmer [04:08]

• Bremmer on Trump’s Value Alignment with Putin:

  “Trump thinks a strong EU is bad for the United States. I think a strong EU is good for the US in a fragmented world.”
  – Ian Bremmer [50:11]

• Bremmer on Media and Societal Truths:

  “We increasingly don't in any way agree on basic truths because we never did.”
  – Ian Bremmer [54:03]

• Bremmer on Capitalism and Corporate Responsibility:

  “We have a society that also feels incredibly polarized and hard done by and angry constantly.”
  – Ian Bremmer [59:11]

---

This episode offers a profound exploration of the intersection between American political shifts and global power dynamics, providing listeners with a nuanced understanding of the challenges and potential pathways forward.

Transcript

[Chris Cuomo]

Support for the Chris Cuomo project comes from AG1. Listen, we're getting into the spring. Everybody wants to declutter spring cleaning. We all need resets all the time.

[Ian Bremmer]

And one of the easiest things to.

[Chris Cuomo]

Do is to start your day off right in terms of taking care of yourself. And that's where AG1 comes in.

[Ian Bremmer]

You're just one and done.

[Chris Cuomo]

Unlike other supplements with a lot of big claims, without research. Again, AG1 has the facts, okay? And if you look at the research that they've done, you'll see that there's a reason that so many people have used AG1 for so long. So when it comes to my health, I want something I can Trust. I choose AG1. Science backed ingredients, benefits. I can feel. AG1 makes it easy to support overall wellness every day. And that's why I've been partnering with AG1 for so long. AG1 offering new subscribers a free $76 gift when you sign up.

[Ian Bremmer]

Ooh.

[Chris Cuomo]

You'll get a welcome kit, a bottle of D3K2 and five free travel packs in your first box. So make sure to check out drinkag1.com CCP and get this offer. That's drinkag1.com CCP. Start your new year on a healthier note. Is Trump making things better or worse for America? On the world stage, I'm Chris Cuomo. Welcome to the Chris Cuomo Project. Ian Bremmer has become such a success in business and in media because he is a citizen of the world and he goes around not just as a consultant, but as a consumer of understanding, of perspective. And he has a take on what the Trump administration is doing that may be doing America dirty. Not today, but sooner than any of us would want to imagine. And the idea of isolation, being isolating from progress and what drives the world forward is a really scary proposition. And Ian Bremmer understands it really well in a way that even I can. So here he is with his understanding of where we are and where we're going to be. Ian Bremmer.

[Ian Bremmer]

Thank you for doing this.

[Unknown Guest]

Absolutely.

[Ian Bremmer]

I appreciate you. I'm a huge fan of yours and I appreciate your friendship. I tell the audience every time you're on with me that this. If you want to know why I think the way I do or why I know what I know, you know, you and what you're doing with your outfits. And you've become a clearinghouse of ideas for me.

[Unknown Guest]

Well, the friendship is mutual and I'm very happy always to be with you.

[Ian Bremmer]

And I was saying to Ian before we started really storied career and well warranted. But I honestly do believe, and you may not want to hear this, but I do believe that you are just coming in to what is going to be the period of most need and resonance of your level of analysis and understanding of geopolitics. I think you're just entering.

[Unknown Guest]

You say that for kind of a bad reason.

[Ian Bremmer]

Right.

[Unknown Guest]

Which is that, you know, the, the information environment is so falling apart.

[Ian Bremmer]

Yes.

[Unknown Guest]

For people in this country.

[Ian Bremmer]

Yes. But there's a reciprocal. Right. There's a reciprocal need. So people are looking for good faith actors and there's so few people that they can look at and say, so what is Ian selling? Where's he coming from? You know, he doesn't seem to bash one of these sides enough for me to know his type. And I just, I'm happy I'm happ.

[Unknown Guest]

Known me long enough to understand that, like I may, I'll get it wrong plenty. But I am a good faith athlete. I'm telling you what I actually think.

[Ian Bremmer]

Yes. And so when you look at where we are, one, is it remarkable, do you believe historically we're in a special place?

[Unknown Guest]

Oh, yeah.

[Ian Bremmer]

Just because of Trump?

[Unknown Guest]

No, no, no. Trump is the principal symptom and beneficiary of a breakdown in how people think about the US Political system. But I mean, much more broadly, this is a unique global moment because the United States is now undoing its own global order. It's saying the things that the Americans historically built up and believe in, like collective security and alliances, like global free trade and globalization, like rule of law, like the promotion of democracy, all of those things we think have either been corrupted or don't work for us or we're spending too much, other people are free riding. Whatever the constellation of reasons, we're done with it. And we're now unwinding that order that is utterly unique, that has never happened in our lives before. And it's gonna create enormous chaos all around the world.

[Ian Bremmer]

The basic assumption is less involvement, more resources at home, less exposure, Better for America.

[Unknown Guest]

Absolutely. You know, we've been spending all of this and our corporations have gotten super rich. But what about the average American? And you know, this goes back to you look at the people that voted in November and they voted on issues, they voted on immigration and abortion and eggs and inflation, and some of them even voted on Gaza. Very few of them voted on democracy as their top issue. But of those that said democracy matters, most of those people voted for Trump. And the reason they voted for Trump is not because they all thought he was such a paragon of American virtue, but because they thought that over the course of decades, the US Political system had been captured by special interests, by big money, Democrat and Republican, and that it wasn't helping them. So they wanted someone who was going to disrupt that system. And Trump was the great disruptor that was available on the stage.

[Ian Bremmer]

So what's the answer for you to. Well, what's so bad? What's so bad about what he wants to do?

[Unknown Guest]

There is core of truth, as you know, Chris, in so much of what he says, there's a core of truth. It's very rare that Trump makes a big statement and it's 100% wrong. My problem is that when you take a chainsaw to things that you have built up over a long period of time, like NATO, right, you take a chainsaw to the support that you've given Ukraine for three years, take a chainsaw to USAID and you shut down 87% of it, that will have significant long term, unintended consequences which will hurt us.

[Ian Bremmer]

Won'T just hurt the world level of confidence in that.

[Unknown Guest]

Very high, very high. And by the way, it won't just hurt us, it's also gonna hurt lots of other people around the world who I actually care about. As a fellow human being. I understand that we should care more about Americans than people that aren't American. But I also feel like being American is kind of a roll of the dice, kind of random chance that you and I are so lucky that we happen to be Americans. And I feel like, at least for those of us that are in a position of power, that we have some obligation to do things for more than just Americans. But I wouldn't make this argument with you on this show if it were only about helping people outside this country. I think that we are doing things that will damage us long term, Mike. Well, I mean, so many examples. Trump just made these latest announcements on the new tariffs. We're going to hit the Canadians in the face with our closest friends, the most integrated economy with us globally, and we are making them into an adversary. Canadians don't trust us the way they used to. They're angry with us. And we are undermining our own ability to conduct normal business with, to attract them as tourists, to engage with them in education, all of these things that long term, I think it is good for us to have friends that we don't have to worry so much about.

[Ian Bremmer]

Agreed. So the counter is, you know, Ian, you, Cuomo, you're soft and you, I'm.

[Unknown Guest]

Softer than you are, Chris. I mean, just take a look.

[Ian Bremmer]

No, you're smarter than I am. Not softer.

[Unknown Guest]

I might not be softer in the.

[Ian Bremmer]

Head, but, you know, the head. Very strong, very strong. So they, they say, you know, you guys, you care. You just care about us more. Canada gets it. Corny, he's a banker. These are tactics. You guys are wringing your hands about tariffs. One, they really haven't been in place yet. They're not going to be long term. This is just how Trump gets him to the table. You may not like it, but he won the election. And making his words reality is a mistake, and it's a gratuitous mistake because, you know, he doesn't mean it that way. It's not Bill Clinton saying he's going to put tariffs. It's a guy who uses hyperbole the way, you know, you use oxygen. So don't worry so much. That's the counter. I get it from all of his people.

[Unknown Guest]

It's a useful counter. It applied in a much greater way in his first term, where he was surrounded by people that he needed, who were sensible adults and who were willing and capable of pushing back on him, giving him good information that sometimes he didn't want to hear, and adapting his strategy over time. That is not true this time around. He's 78, so he's a lot older. He was shot in the head a few months ago. That affects you, right? I mean, when, like, someone tries to assassinate you and it's this close, changes your view. So he thinks he has very little time. He has to get things done fast. And he's much more powerful. He's surrounded by people, some of whom are very capable, some of whom should never be in cabinet, but they all are, yes. Men and women. They're all like, you are right about everything, sir. They're not willing to push back. And it's not just Cabinet. We see this with CEOs around him now. We see this with a whole bunch of even global leaders, many of whom are scared to push back because they recognize that they don't want to get hit in the face by the most powerful man in the world right now. Right. And he is that. He is that.

[Ian Bremmer]

Oh, yeah. All day.

[Unknown Guest]

All day. And so I think that for those that are saying, don't worry, he's actually not going to be that disruptive. He's really transactional. I think he was transactional in his first term. I think this time around, domestically, he's not transactional. He's revolutionary. He's actually really trying to fundamentally change how business gets done in this country and in our political system and internationally. He's not transactional. He's predatory, where he's stronger than other folks. Because it's not about a win win for everybody. It's about I'm making the rules, and you're going to either accept those rules or I'm going to punch you in the face. And you can ask the Canadians, the Mexicans, the Panamanians, you can ask the Danes, you can ask the Germans, ask them if they believe that Trump is transactional or is he a predator? And they'll say, oh, no, we know what he is right now.

[Ian Bremmer]

Why do you think he doesn't go after big dogs, strong guys, people who can also punch in the face?

[Unknown Guest]

For that reason, I think he would like to avoid getting punched in the face. It's not a stupid guy, right? I mean, I think he's much so, for example, on Europe, when you talk about trade, which they have in their core competency, and they coordinate as the EU as a bloc, which is comparable size of the US and we know they can regulate the hell out of things, and they got a lot of red tape. And he's much more careful with them on trade collectively than he is with the Canadians or the Mexicans.

[Ian Bremmer]

Why?

[Unknown Guest]

Because it's very easy for him to take a sledgehammer to the Canadians and the Mexicans.

[Ian Bremmer]

So it is a straight bully play.

[Unknown Guest]

It's a straight power play. I mean, call it what you want, but I mean, and it frequently works, by the way. I mean, he's gotten to where he is, right? I mean, not only a billionaire, not only president once, but also the greatest comeback story in the history of American politics, Donald Trump. How many people have written this guy off?

[Ian Bremmer]

Me, I. I must have said it a dozen times that you can't overcome this. Now, I think that that's what he has going for him most, which is, this is the fault of everyone else. Our political system. There has been such a miasma of and inaction and incrementalism that this is what you get when you have a political system that is inherently corrupted by.

[Unknown Guest]

Money, where it was well before Trump.

[Ian Bremmer]

And an inside game. And a lot of things don't get worked on and everything is talk and they're all kind of on the take one way or another. And there is an chasm between Main street and Wall Street. This is what you get is a guy who comes from Wall street, metaphorically, and is an elite, knows the establishment and hates it. As much as everybody else who's not part of it does. This is what you get. It's not his fault.

[Unknown Guest]

But it isn't the only thing you get. I mean, you also get Bernie Sanders, right, who is, like, fundamentally not a corrupt human being, way too old to be president, but nonetheless was someone that, in my view, was much more standing up for the average person, for Joe Worker.

[Ian Bremmer]

But he wasn't the look they wanted. I know, not the orange face.

[Unknown Guest]

But the thing that we know about.

[Ian Bremmer]

Trump doesn't believe in God, doesn't believe in Cat.

[Unknown Guest]

But the thing that we know Trump believes in God, who knows? But, I mean, look, he's got a.

[Chris Cuomo]

Very tight relationship with God.

[Ian Bremmer]

You never heard him quote the Bible.

[Unknown Guest]

I understand. Believe me, it's his favorite book. I mean, even more than Art of the Deal.

[Ian Bremmer]

Loves it, loves all the stories.

[Unknown Guest]

But, I mean, we know that if there's one thing that is really true of Trump, it's that you can pay him with money. He will do what you want if you give him cash, which is not something that, frankly, the average American can or will benefit from. Right, right. That's the real problem is that the level of kleptocracy, which is already at staggering levels in the United States, has just become greater. If you really want to understand the majority of Trump's moves in policy, you should figure out, okay, who are the folks that have managed to get him a bunch of money and what do they want? And that's why he's doing it. That's why the crypto industry is doing so incredibly well right now, because that was the sector that gave everything to Trump. And so he's going to give them what he wants. And this is not helping the average American, like, not at all. If you really believed. I mean, he's great on circuses. Right. Don't get me wrong, he's an incredibly entertaining. He's funny and he drives a lot of people insane, and he makes you. If you're someone that wants to see a whole bunch of people that you disagree with politically lose their collective shit, then Trump is your guy.

[Ian Bremmer]

See, that's. I get that, but see, but that's a lot.

[Unknown Guest]

You say it's a lot, but you asked me the question. You asked me. Wasn't that. The question you asked me is whether I think this is good for America long term.

[Ian Bremmer]

Right.

[Unknown Guest]

And the answer is no, because I don't think the average American is well served by this. As someone who grew up in the projects. Right, right. I just see these people Getting shat on and shat on and shat on again. And people that come in, you know, that are, that have a circus show. When the circus leaves town, what's left?

[Ian Bremmer]

I'm with you. And it's my concern. Also, I have no idea how to address it, how to bridge it, how to brook it, any, any metaphor you want to use. I don't know what to do about it, but I, I share the concern because I share the interest.

[Unknown Guest]

What you do about it is you don't turn the knob to 11 on every perceived slight. What you do about it is when there is something that is truly going to damage the country, that's when you actually train your fire.

[Ian Bremmer]

When the left says you're a red.

[Unknown Guest]

Pilled apologist, that's when you train your fire. I don't care what the left says. You and I are big boys.

[Ian Bremmer]

I know. Well, listen, I signed up for this, but I'm saying it's hard not having a team in a team based media business, which is what we're in right now.

[Unknown Guest]

Yeah.

[Chris Cuomo]

Support for the Chris Cuomo project comes from Factor. Okay. If you go to my substack and join, you will become part of my wellness health reclamation program. And I am using Factor Meals and so far so good. I've gotten rid of that first batch of bloat inflammation. Why better food? Factor has all the nutritional information on the back. They balance sodium with protein and carbs with everything that you need in a way that will help you sustain my weight loss goals. How does Factor do that? They have chef made gourmet meals that make the eating part easy. They're tasty. They're also dietitian approved and they're easy.

[Ian Bremmer]

Ready to heat and eat in two minutes.

[Chris Cuomo]

Eat smart with Factor. I'll make it simple. You want to eat smart? Use factor. Get started@factor meals.com Factor podcast and you get 50% off your first box plus free shipping. That's code Factor podcast@factor meals.com Factor podcast and you will get 50% off plus free shipping on your first box. Support for the Chris Cuomo project comes from Radioactive media business owners CMOs. How do you plan on growing in 2025? Going to be a lot of uncertainties. So what can you count on? Well, that things will be different. Right. The only thing that is a given is change. Why not utilize something remarkable, something stable for your marketing efforts? Tap into the power of podcast and radio reach in the US audio reach is more than 270 million people a week. 270 million. That's more than social media and digital combined. My friends at Radioactive Media know the recipe to launch, optimize and scale performance by building compelling audio campaigns which work like this one. They believe in the power of radio so much, they even use it themselves right here, right now. That's why they're advertising on my show, because it works. Text my first name C H r I s to 511-511-text Chris to 511-511 or on the web at Radioactive Media.com text rates of course they apply. Support comes from Irestore. So here we are heading into March. Got the winter blues. You want a fresh start, Let technology be part of your solution, especially when it comes to comes to thinning hair and hair loss. You want to take a look at the Irestore Elite?

[Ian Bremmer]

Okay.

[Chris Cuomo]

It is a clinically proven solution. Lasers are where it's at. Irestore has 282 lasers with all these LEDs. And the LEDs are delivering light therapy directly to your scalp. And that's the key. The research is there.

[Ian Bremmer]

I've started using it. I'll keep track of of it. You can watch me as we go.

[Chris Cuomo]

Along and we'll see what it does. So far, I certainly feel like something's happening when it's on and my hair looks good. Give yourself the gift of hair confidence, that's what you need. This spring, for a limited time, our listeners are going to get $625 off their iRestore Elite. You just got to use the code [e-mail] six hundred twenty twenty five bucks off your irestore [e-mail] with the promo code Chris. Now when you're there, please support the Chris Cuomo project. Tell them that we sent you. Hair loss is frustrating, but you don't have to be frustrated. There are remedies and Irestore is a step towards better.

[Ian Bremmer]

So the movie Snatch, there's a Great, there are 100 great lines, but there's a great line ended. That really was the moment that I realized this, this is what, this is what Trump is, he is going to win. And I had him winning against Hillary early. I won a lot of money on that election, $1 bets. But I had just gone to like covered four or five of the rallies in Snatch and I didn't, by the way, in last one.

[Unknown Guest]

I definitely thought he was going to win first one.

[Ian Bremmer]

I didn't think the rallies, the disconnect of because we kept saying, Ah, 20,000 people, 30,000 people. 50,000 people, 60,000 people, whatever. We're talking about tens of millions.

[Unknown Guest]

But he connected.

[Ian Bremmer]

But they were the same everywhere in the country. They were all saying the same things. So the guy says he's going to feed them to the pigs. That guy in Snatch, you see Snatch? Oh, fucking amazing. Anyway, the guy says, do you know what nemesis means? And he comes up with the definition of a righteous infliction of retribution manifested by the appropriate agent. In this case, an horrible cunt. Me is what he says. That's Trump. If you're mad at the system, if you feel that they don't give a shit because they don't respect you, because you're not part of what they need, he will make them pay. He will punish them. He is not a cure. He is a virus to the political corpus to make it sick and vomit and get febrile and hopefully when it comes out of it, its new state of health will be more fair to people because it will now fear them because they will have whooped its ass. Yeah, that's what people are banking on.

[Unknown Guest]

That's what. Yeah, I get that they're banking on it, but they're okay with that not happening as long as there's a lot of pain and damage done to their enemies. Yes, and that, of course, is the problem, because I would bet on the pain and damage, but I would bet against what happens as we come out of it. What happens is that the Chinese are in a far better system. They're in a far better position. And why would we want that? They're our principal adversary. They run a system that, as bad as the American system, as hypocritical as the American system, as challenging and kleptocratic as the American system, the Chinese system is worse. And we don't want a world where their lack of accountability, their complete lack of transparency, their surveillance state actually has far more influence all over the world. And that is precisely what Trump is setting up to do for them over the long term. That's precisely what he's doing.

[Ian Bremmer]

Why?

[Unknown Guest]

Well, because the United States think about the billions of people around the world. They have belt and road. They understand that soft power matters. They understand that economic investments matter. And the United States takes all those countries and hits them in the mouth.

[Ian Bremmer]

So what Ian is describing right now is an important point that I only know observationally. Every time you go to a major crisis around the world, the Chinese are there building something. I shit you not whether it's. And I don't say this, I don't say this so that you think bad things about the Chinese. It's not my point. To me, it's all about advantage.

[Unknown Guest]

I'd rather have it being built than nothing be built.

[Ian Bremmer]

Like when it was the tsunamis.

[Unknown Guest]

Yeah.

[Ian Bremmer]

Like people are still pulling people. The earth moving machines. All Chinese.

[Unknown Guest]

Twenty years ago, by the way. That wasn't true.

[Ian Bremmer]

Yes.

[Unknown Guest]

They learned that because they recognized that just having their power wasn't enough. That we actually got a lot by having our place in these international organizations. So we're going to pull out of the un. You saw Elon said we're going to pull out of the un. You know who becomes the most important in the world immediately. All day long, all the appointments, them. They're the ones coming out saying, we're multilateralist. Absolutely. We love these organizations. Climate change, transition energy. We've got people saying there's no climate change. We're pulling out a Paris climate accord. You know who's going to drive all of that, you know, as the best technology at scale for post carbon energy? China. Who's going to be aligning with them? Everybody. Why would we want that? We can't. Why we give that to him? I understand Trump's 78. He's not thinking about what's going to happen in 10 years. But you and I are. We're still going to be around. And why do we have to pick up the trash globally? For someone that doesn't care about where our country's gonna be in five or 10 years, that bothers me. I'm a patriot. I don't like seeing that.

[Ian Bremmer]

Why isn't this a first step towards getting our shit together and making us a more formidable adversary against China? Because we're stronger at home.

[Unknown Guest]

It should be. If you don't at the same time destroy everything that is important that you've built around the world. You can't only focus on the United States when China's focusing on everything else. Doesn't make any sense.

[Ian Bremmer]

Why isn't it excused as just temporary shaking everybody up, letting them know they've been on the tit for too long and he's going to reset everything. This is just how he does it. He doesn't play the game. He messes with everybody's head. But he's not going to shed our allies. He's just going to make them earn it well again.

[Unknown Guest]

So look at USAID, right? And we spend. The Americans spend. 40% of the world's humanitarian aid comes from the United States. They have shut down 87% of it. And I Will tell you, Chris, there were absolutely programs that should be shut down. There was stupid shit that 99% of the taxpayers would say, why the hell is my money going for that? But there was also combating malaria, there was also fighting aids. There was also dealing with children hunger. And in all of those countries, we are out and people are dying because of us and it's completely unnecessary. Unless you're saying the cruelty is the point. And I don't even think that I.

[Ian Bremmer]

Should keep in the 13%. Let other people pay more and they will let these countries come back to us and ask for it the right way and give us something in exchange.

[Unknown Guest]

We get all sorts of things in exchange. We have better relations with these countries because we're on the ground, we have political influence, shithole countries.

[Ian Bremmer]

Give us the minerals, give us the oil, give us something. Because that's the. Although I got to say, the mineral rights deal with Ukraine is smart because it's going to put a corporate footprint in places that Russia now can't bomb. Because if you bomb and you hit dupont, you got a real problem.

[Unknown Guest]

You tell me how many years before a single dollar and a single comes in, investment goes in.

[Ian Bremmer]

I mean, essentially it sounds like you're getting something better.

[Unknown Guest]

Yeah, of course, I can understand that. That is what the marketing is going to be. And Trump is a great marketing guy. He'll make this sound great, just like he makes the Riviera out of Gaza sound great. It's never going to happen.

[Ian Bremmer]

Well, that's not going to happen, but the mineral deal will happen. You're saying it doesn't happen anytime soon.

[Unknown Guest]

I'm saying that the mineral deal will, over the course of a Trump presidency, there will be no money invested in minerals on the ground in Ukraine. I would make that very strong bet. I think that that is, it is, it is all smoke and mirror.

[Ian Bremmer]

So how do you see what Tucker and I were chewing on about this to me, 180 degree turn in what Ukraine is through the lens of America's interests.

[Unknown Guest]

Well, first of all, I want to thank you, Chris, for your service, for chatting with Tucker so that I don't have to. I think that's very important.

[Ian Bremmer]

You, you should. It'd be hard for you because, you know, I'm much more of a mouth breather. So, you know, he, he and I, you know, there's a, there's a different level of it. You're so sophisticated. Although, you know what Ian hints to it every once in a while. There's a lot of street in Ian's background. I know you get overwhelmed by the presence and the decorative hose, but there he is.

[Unknown Guest]

H O S E, by the way, that's what very clear, Chris.

[Ian Bremmer]

He is the American dream. He is somebody who showed that this system can work and create greatness if you have it inside of you and the desire to work it. Which is why I've always been such.

[Unknown Guest]

A fan and I can now be myself. And it turns out this is me for.

[Ian Bremmer]

Yeah, there's no artifice. He must have had a hard time in the hood, but I'm telling you, he got out. Absolutely. Now he get out because I was.

[Unknown Guest]

Going to get my ass kicked.

[Ian Bremmer]

That's very clear.

[Unknown Guest]

Yeah.

[Ian Bremmer]

So the you, the Ukraine paradigm shift, I'm probably oversimplifying, but I really believe it came down to that phone call. And when.

[Unknown Guest]

When Trump was in the perfect film. Absolutely perfect.

[Ian Bremmer]

So he hates that. So then he leaves and America, I get fired. America falls in love with Ukraine as the new Americans who are fighting the oppressor in Russia the way we did with England. Everybody's got a blue and yellow on. I become so dislocated and so discomfited by what's happening. I actually go to Ukraine on my own dive just to. Because it was the first conference.

[Unknown Guest]

I remember that since 2000. Yep.

[Ian Bremmer]

And I get it when I'm there, like, wow, these fuckers are really coming together over, like they're willing to put it all on the line to be free. And they have a cultural connection to these guys and they still, they will fight to the death for this. This is very brave. And now Tucker Carlson is one of a host of influential people, including our president, who look at Ukraine and see Russia.

[Unknown Guest]

Well, so I understand, first of all, the United States has spent about $115 billion. Okay. On American firms and contractors. So it's, you know, Americans are benefiting from it, but it's the military industrial complex. The fact that that money could have been spent on other things, instead it was spent on defending Ukraine, which is far away. And the Europeans have spent about 130 billion, 135 billion, which is like roughly parity. Their slightly larger population. Shouldn't they be spending a lot more, given that it's right there in Europe? Yes. So that's number one. Number two, over the course of the last two years, the lines of the front in fighting have virtually not changed. And a lot of people are dying. We've gone through Afghanistan for 20 years. We recognize we spent trillions and so many people died senselessly. Well, why don't we stop this? Right? I mean, you don't need to say that Zelensky is a dictator and he's not. You don't need that argument to say we should put some pressure, real pressure, on ending the war. And yes, ending the war means Ukraine is not going to get all their land back. Not because we think it's right, but because there isn't a plausible way to get Russia off of that. Now, the problem is not that reality. You and I can have that conversation. And by the way, we could have that conversation with Mike Waltz and Marco Rubio. That would be a smart conversation. The problem is that when you go from there to acting by yourself, not with your allies, because NATO is more important than Ukraine. And one thing I give Biden credit on, he didn't end the war, didn't push to end the war, but he did keep the allies together with the United States in lockstep. We didn't do stuff away from them. Trump calls Putin for 90 minutes. Allies don't even know he's doing it. Trump gets Ukraine in a room, right? He beats him up, calls him a dictator. Europeans are spending just as much money. What the hell's happened to the alliance? So why wouldn't we want to do this with our friends? You want to end the war, let's end it together. And we have more influence. We can do that. We can get our friends in a room privately and say, we're going to end this war.

[Ian Bremmer]

Why do you think he's doing it that way? Because he promised to in the campaign. He doesn't understand their need for them or he believes they want to keep it going.

[Unknown Guest]

Number one, he doesn't care. I think he thinks the allies are expendable. It's exactly what he did when he pulled the troops out of Afghanistan. You had allies of the United States that were fighting shoulder to shoulder with Americans for 20 years. And Trump ends the war, pulls out the troops, right? And he does a deal with the Taliban. He doesn't engage the Afghan government that were our partners on the ground. And he doesn't even talk to the Europeans or the Gulfies or the rest that had sent those troops to fight with us. Now, the stakes are a lot higher for Ukraine because that's in Europe, but it's the same playbook. It's not like he hasn't done this before. He doesn't care about allies. He's bigger, he's more powerful. He doesn't need to talk to you.

[Ian Bremmer]

He also gets the COVID of it being in someone else's mess. Afghanistan, Biden all day, botched.

[Unknown Guest]

Terrible.

[Ian Bremmer]

He had to. He had to fix it. He had to save it. Ukraine, Biden let it go on too long. Like, Tucker has this line that I've heard from a lot of these guys. Russia won. Russia beat us. We couldn't beat Russia. And it's a really interesting flip of the reality. And I had to remind him in the interview, although I didn't really have to. He knows this. We all thought Russia was going to blow through in about 72 hours, three days. And he does not see it that way. He sees it and Trump does also. Even his own kids. I'm telling you, they believe this. Russia can end it like that. They're not. Because they're just trying to let us know that NATO can't expand and they're not using any of their real military that they could or their citizenry. They're using the prisoners because they don't really want them to have to sacrifice for this.

[Unknown Guest]

They have had over 850,000 casualties in this war. The Russians have. And it is absolutely. They've had to orient 40% of their GDP towards destructive non productive assets in a war that just get chewed up and wasted. So this is horrible for them. But they believe that they can outlast the Americans and the Europeans. And you know what?

[Ian Bremmer]

They're right. They're right right now. I mean, because it seems that we want out now. My understanding is that Europe won't continue it without us. That if, if, if, if he doesn't cut a deal. But the deal is, look, I'm getting out. Mm. So that they won't continue it with us without us. Do you believe that?

[Unknown Guest]

I think that's probably right. They. The problem is that. Who's they? My mother would also say, who's they? You got a rat in your pocket.

[Ian Bremmer]

Like, what are we talking about?

[Unknown Guest]

And you know, there are lots of people in Europe that will continue to stick with the Europeans no matter what. The Balts, the Nordics, the Poles. Right. And I mean, because this is. This is all in for them. The polls are now saying we need nukes. Polls are like, already spending. They're moving to 5% of GDP, defense spend. That's a lot more than the U.S. spends. Right. And Poland's a real country. It's a real economy. Right.

[Ian Bremmer]

And they've taken, I mean, millions of Ukrainians.

[Unknown Guest]

Yeah.

[Ian Bremmer]

He's an impressive leader, that guy. I've gotten. I got to watch them a little bit up close.

[Unknown Guest]

Yep.

[Ian Bremmer]

And they really have Borne the brunt of this. They brought all those people in there. People weren't happy. The Polish economy is not killing it.

[Unknown Guest]

The farmers don't like it because, I mean, you know, Ukraine's needs to be able to, like, get exports out, that kind of thing. It's a huge problem.

[Ian Bremmer]

So he stepped up.

[Unknown Guest]

So that's why it's hard. Say. I don't want to say the Europeans won't without reflecting the fact that there are people, there are countries in Europe that feel like this is existential for us. They really do. But the Europeans as a whole, I think, are not going to send meaningful numbers of troops on the ground to act as a backstop unless the Americans are there. I think that's true. Having said that, the Europeans in that environment will spend vastly more on their own defense in order to be independent from the United States.

[Ian Bremmer]

So explain the downside to that, because where we are now with it is to your point about core of truth.

[Unknown Guest]

Sounds good.

[Ian Bremmer]

You know, they have really been riding on us for a while. Like, we have to be the muscle in every situation. Why don't they build it up? The Germans, the French, you know, all these other guys, why don't they build up their armies, let them go in there and let us be the money for a change. Let us be the ancillary support, especially when it's incontinent for them. What's wrong with that?

[Unknown Guest]

Well, first of all, I would argue that Trump and Biden and Putin have all been successful in getting the Europeans to ramp up their defense spend without throwing the alliance under the bus. Over the last 10 years, that's been meaningful. Trump pushed on this in his first term and he had some success. Putin then invaded and that got them to do a lot more. And that was successful. Right. That's different from doing so much that you break the relationship. Now, I understand that sounds like a nuanced sort of argument, but there's a big difference between spending more and working together and urgency doing everything you can because you recognize you can't rely on the Americans anymore and breaking it. What do we get from coordinating with the Europeans, even if they're comparatively weak? Well, when we want a joint policy on something, like when the one time that we actually used Article 5 in NATO collective security, when we were attacked in 9, 11, who came with us? Everyone did. Everyone did. They won't do that again. Does that matter to us? I think it should. Secondly, when we have issues because the Americans are technologically dominant, the Chinese are technologically dominant, no one Else is we go to the Europeans first and foremost and we say, we want you to coordinate with us on our semiconductor policy. And the Dutch stand up immediately and they've got world class capabilities. Yeah, we're going to work with the United States. Are they going to do that next time? I'm not so sure they are. So you're not going to get the coordination from the world's largest common market. They will see us as adversaries, not friends.

[Ian Bremmer]

And when Trump says, you know, the media paints it one way, but, you know, all these people love me, they're my friends. These European countries, you know, I know all the leaders that they're my friends, you know, we work together just fine. Do you buy that? 1%?

[Unknown Guest]

Not even 1%? No. I mean, of course there are people in Europe that. There are absolutely people around the world that are supportive of Trump. And I really do believe that there is a populist upswell.

[Ian Bremmer]

Yeah, we were like five years behind here. Right. There was, there was populist to the right movements through Europe and Eastern Europe five years before.

[Unknown Guest]

But again, and understandably so. And I get why Brexit happened, even though I think it was economically really damaging for the uk I get why you've had this, you know, sort of resurgence of that sort of Euro skeptic sentiment. But on the back of the pandemic, people realized they actually needed Europe. On the back of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, they recognized they need Europe. On the back of Trump, people recognize they need Europe. And so I think he's wrong that you're going to suddenly have in five years time a whole bunch of people that want to break Europe apart and that making Europe great again with populism will not be, we all want to follow Trump. It won't be a bunch of Viktor Orbans, Georgia Maloney, for all of her friendship with Trump. And Elon Musk is first and foremost pro eu and she's trying to act as a bridge with the Americans so that they don't get really undermined and fragmented. But she has been very, very strong. Her policy on Russia, Ukraine completely aligned with the eu. Her economic policies completely aligned with the eu, even though on migration, she's with Trump, but frankly, everyone in Europe is with Trump because there it hit Europe before it hit the United States. Remember Angela Merkel? Right? I mean, she got it wrong. She's like, no, we'll let in all these Syrians. And everyone said, no, no, we won't. Like, we don't want those people here. We're not Ready to integrate led to a much earlier sense of populism than we had in the United States driving those policies. So it's complicated, but the point is that the most important alliance in the world of countries that in principle trusted each other, were aligned with each other, did built that trust into something that was greater than just the relationship on security, on the economy, on peace and stability around the world has been the transatlantic relationship. And I've never seen any level of damage close to what Trump has managed in his first 50 days, second term.

[Ian Bremmer]

Damage, not just change damage.

[Unknown Guest]

I think that this is now, I think the single thing he has accomplished on the global stage in his first 50 days that really matters, that's permanent, has been helping destroy the US European relationship. That's been his signature accomplishment of his first. He's done other things. He's gotten a ceasefire in Gaza, Hezbollah, Lebanon. Right. He started a trade war with the Canadians and the Mexicans, which will probably lead both of them to ultimately do a whole bunch of things. The Americans want much easier with Mexico, much harder with Canada because they're in an electoral cycle. Easy with Mexico because she's got 85 approval rate, percent approval ratings. The president. But the, but the really impactful thing that he's done on the global stage in the first 50 days has been against Europe.

[Ian Bremmer]

And you see no value in the counter that, well, he's disrupted it, he hasn't destroyed it. They're more responsive to us now. They know they have to give more, they have to pull their weight. These are positive changes.

[Unknown Guest]

Permanent damage. Permanent damage. So you gotta understand that the Europeans are getting hit by the, by Trump in three different ways at the same time. First is the trade stuff and they know that. They've dealt with it before. Not surprising. And they're strong and competent on trade, they can handle themselves, but that's one issue. Secondly is on Ukraine and Trump not just saying I want to end the war, saying he wants to end the war. According to the Europeans, they would get that Trump saying, I want to build a relationship with your principal enemy and I'm going to do it without talking with you. Right. That, that was fundamental to undermining how the Europeans think about the US and then third is Trump and Elon and Vance actually saying that you aren't democracies, that you're our principal national security problem because you refuse to work with these anti Europeans, particularly In Germany, the AfD, who the Germans see as a neo Nazi party. So I mean just core, core to their identity for rule of law and for democracy. And instead the Trump folks saying you guys are a bunch of woke libtards and we're not gonna tolerate that. So again, it is true that America now is run by a leadership that actually has some fundamentally different values than a lot of European leaders do. But the reality is those three things together at the same time have convinced the Europeans that they cannot rely on the United States.

[Chris Cuomo]

Support comes from Shopify. So you want to be a success in selling. It is not so much about the product as it is placement and performance of the shopping experience of that product. That's the key. The selling of a business often comes from the business behind the business that makes that sales experience possible. Think of Allbirds, Aviator Nation. It's all about what happens when you go there. That kind of works to make you want to make purchases all the way through from how you experience the site to what seems to entice to how easy the transaction is. That's why businesses start killing it and selling through the roof. Upgrade your business. Get the same checkout that Allbirds or Aviator Nation uses. Sign up for your $1 a month [e-mail] Chris C All lowercase that's the key. All lowercase go to shopify.com Chris Chris C all lowercase to upgrade your selling today. Shopify.com Chris C support for the Chris Cuomo project comes from Select Quote. So you're the head of a household. You have responsibilities, you have dependence, you have assets. You're growing assets, you're living off assets, you're figuring out what to do with assets. You know what all of that means. Financial planning. Specifically. How are you preparing to take care of those who look to you to.

[Ian Bremmer]

Take care of them?

[Chris Cuomo]

Select Quote is one of America's leading insurance brokers. 40 years of experience, just about over 2 million customers, over $700 billion in coverage since way back in 1985. Time and experience matter. Other life insurance brokers impersonal one size fits all policies that may cost you more cover you less. Not Select Quote licensed agents working for you to tailor a life insurance policy for your individual needs and can be as little as 15 minutes in the consultation. Get the right life insurance for you for less at selectquote.selectquote.com Chris C. Go today. Get started. Selectquote.com Chris C what do you think.

[Ian Bremmer]

Motivates Trump's disposition towards Russia and Putin?

[Unknown Guest]

Well, I think there are a few things. One is that I don't think Putin disrespects Trump in a way that European leaders do I think that when he. I remember when Trump went to the first G20 back in 2017, when he was first president, and you got all these leaders around the table and you've got these well educated elite Europeans that don't respect Trump, that snigger about him when he's not around and sometimes even within earshot, and he gets the intelligence, he knows what they actually think and then he sees. Just like Obama, by the way. Right? And Trump takes that very personally. And Putin treats Trump the way MBS does from Saudi Arabia, treats him just like a normal guy. So, number one, I think Trump has a level of affinity with someone who he believes treats him with a level of actual respect. Secondly, I think that Trump sees Russia as willing to play ball with him commercially in the way that the Saudis do, in a way the Europeans won't. I mean, the Saudis have done all sorts of business with Trump family and other priorities that are interesting. They are super transactional in ways that, I mean, corruption is not a thing. It's not the family owns Saudi Arabia. It's an extended family. So they're more than willing. Putin, same thing. So I think that there will be significant. I think the cash register will be open for Trump, et al, if a deal with Russia is done. And how transparent will we be? How much will we find out? I have no idea, but I suspect that that plays into this. And then thirdly is the fact that Trump sees himself as a deal maker. He doesn't like Ukraine for reasons that you and I have already spoken about. And Putin has reasons to want to do a broader rapprochement with the United States he hates. There's an alignment between Trump and Putin on Europe. The biggest difference between Trump and previous American presidents is that Trump thinks that a strong EU is bad for the United States. I happen to think a strong EU is good for the US In a fragmented world. I think having large countries that are powerful, that are basically aligned with rule of law is good. Trump thinks, no, no, no, I don't care if you're aligned with rule of law. I want a whole bunch of weak countries around there that I can deal with individually so I can beat on them and get what I want. It's a very Chinese approach to rule of the jungle approach to global affairs. So Trump wants a weaker, more fragmented eu. When Trump used to meet with Macron, he'd always say, when are you doing Brexit? Always do that, right? He liked Brexit, thought Brexit was a good thing. He wants France to Do a Frexit. He wants all them to fall apart. Well, by the way, Putin loves that. Putin doesn't want a strong Europe. Putin wants Europe to fall apart. Right. Who's Putin's best friend in Europe? Orban. Who's Trump's best friend in Europe? Or Bond. Right. So some different reasons behind it. Right. Because, I mean, for Putin, it's actually my backyard, and I want to be able to control more of it. For Trump, it's just these guys are competitive with me and I don't want them to be competitive. But either way, there's real alignment. So I think that there are actually a number of reasons. I wouldn't call them good reasons if you think about US Strategic influence on the global stage long term. But I understand why Trump feels that way. Why Trump would want to spend a lot of time with and do a deal with Putin.

[Ian Bremmer]

Being unburdened by principle is an interesting X factor here.

[Unknown Guest]

There really is.

[Ian Bremmer]

Trump doesn't care if Putin's a bad guy.

[Unknown Guest]

Absolutely.

[Ian Bremmer]

And that's unusual for us because really we've been. Our leaders have been overweighted on that one consideration. Right. I. I now have. You know, it's not my theory, but reading more and more and more about the Cold War, I feel we got duped. I feel that it was a way to build up the military industrial complex. They sure, they have nukes, but not really tactical nukes. And they were never going to be formidable against us. And it was just a way for us to build up against them and create 50 years of stupidity that were unnecessary.

[Unknown Guest]

Yeah. And the CIA estimates of Soviet strength were massively overweight.

[Ian Bremmer]

I remember when Sam Nunn and Dick Luger were cleaning up the nukes.

[Unknown Guest]

Yeah.

[Ian Bremmer]

And they contacted somebody at ABC and they wound up sending me to outer Siberia, which may have been just the goal all along, to go to this place called Shucha and to survey the nukes that they were collecting. And I remember showing up there and this was in. I don't know. I don't know when it was late 90s or early 2000, something like that. Early 2000. And they're keeping them in a barn that has a wax seal on the door.

[Unknown Guest]

Yeah.

[Ian Bremmer]

And I noticed that these soldiers had mix matched uniforms and very few of them were armed. And I was talking to the guys, I was like, is this because we're in outer Siberia and who the fuck is coming here? And he's like, no, they sell their weapons because the economy is so bad they haven't gotten paid and this. And the uniforms are erect and, and I remember coming back being like, this is who we're afraid of. We're afraid of these guys.

[Unknown Guest]

Yeah. How did we not have intel on that?

[Ian Bremmer]

And yeah, they did. It's about how you use it. So how do you see what's happening in our country right now? Where are we? How is this going to be remembered?

[Unknown Guest]

Well, the US is the strongest economy in the world. That's still true. I worry that a China that actually isn't the Soviet Union, they're smaller economy than we are and they're only middle income. But their ability to actually create world changing technology is at our level. So we have a serious competitor now, very different than the Soviet Union was. And that we need to take more seriously. And that means that we need to invest intelligently in our country and also globally because that's what they're doing.

[Ian Bremmer]

But do you see any indication? We seem to be criticizing ourselves right now. We seem to be reevaluating. I do believe that there's a mistake which I may be part of, by the way. I have a new personal practice that I started when I got fired. So it's like a few years in the making. It's still in the laboratory phase where let me consider the criticism of me through the lens of it being true. Let's start that it's true. So on an easy level, personally, it's way stickier. But on a professional level. All right, so I'm part of the problem. I'm part of a media establishment that has stilted narratives and kept information from people to protect the elites, to protect the power structures, to protect the institutions. Okay. That's what I am. And looking at it that way to try to understand the reaction formation that's going on in the country when you do that. So what do, what do you see when you look at the lens of what's happening in this country? Staying within the, the borders of it.

[Unknown Guest]

Yep.

[Ian Bremmer]

What do you think is happening here and what do you think it means?

[Unknown Guest]

I think we're not unifying. Right. We increasingly don't in any way agree on basic truths because we never did.

[Ian Bremmer]

And now it's just out in the open.

[Unknown Guest]

No, no, I think that we actually to a much greater degree did. And I do think that media and algorithms are a big part of that problem. I think that most Americans when I was growing up had a general shared sense of a lot of what was happening. Okay. Not Vietnam. Right. But in terms of like basic, like whether it was a vaccination. Right. Or whether it was what the Soviets were all about or the Iran hostage crisis. Like we didn't have vastly different narratives about the headlines you could read growing up in Chelsea, the Boston Herald, or if you were more educated, the Boston Globe. We got the Herald. My mom got the Inquirer. Okay, but the Inquirer was not news. The Enquirer was crazy shit on the weekends. And the Herald was like, okay, we sort of figured that out. That isn't true anymore. And Trump is a unifier, by the way. He really is just of other countries. He's unifying populations of other countries together. The Canadians are far more unified today than they were before Trump became president. The Mexicans are far more unified. The Europeans are far more unified. I don't like that. I want a president who is not just a winner, but is a leader, a leader of our country. I mean, Trump is a winner. He's always been a winner. For him, right? And for him to be a winner, others have to be losers. And the people that are primarily losers around Trump are people in the United States. They're principally fellow Americans. We need better than that. So I understand that we can all look at ourselves and say, we're part of the problem. What can we do better? But ultimately, Trump is my president. He's your president. And we need our president to be more than a winner who's looking for losers. And we need to call that out. We need leaders. We need leaders. We need our industry, top industry people to be leaders, not winners. And when I look at Elon and Zuck and Bezos, I see winners. And we're great. We produce the most extraordinary winners in the world. But that means that we have a society that also feels incredibly polarized and hard done by and angry constantly. And these algorithms are making money off us because of that. And that's not good. We got to stop that.

[Ian Bremmer]

I don't know how to stop it.

[Unknown Guest]

I devote my life to stopping. I devote my life engaging with people.

[Ian Bremmer]

I know you're good. That section 230, I don't know what to do about it.

[Unknown Guest]

Citizens United. Got to get rid of it.

[Ian Bremmer]

Well, Citizens United, good luck with that.

[Unknown Guest]

I know, but I'm just saying we know what the problems are. We know what the problems are.

[Ian Bremmer]

Well, we had the problem before Citizens United also. But this PAC money now, it's gotten worse. It's such so fucking crazy. But I don't know how you do that. I mean, that's easy. It's just a different case. But section 230, I don't know what to do about it. They're not publishers. I get that. They're not. They're not News Nation, they're not the Wall Street Journal. But the idea that they have no responsibility for what happens on their sites, it's crazy when they are obviously able to manipulate and understand where to put their ads. And Elon is. I don't know this, but my heavy suspicion is that he absolutely knows how to weight narratives. Because when I talk in a way that he would like, I get one level of when it's not what he would like.

[Unknown Guest]

Different level. Exactly the same.

[Ian Bremmer]

So maybe it's a coincidence. I don't think so.

[Unknown Guest]

I don't think it's a coincidence.

[Ian Bremmer]

But I. There. There are two things that I can't figure out that I'd love your take on.

[Unknown Guest]

Sure.

[Ian Bremmer]

One is, I believe that the POD people are the ones spreading the division, making money off of the division, not doing any real reporting, getting information wrong for profit, and making people angry with no endpoint other than their own growth of a following. And they're blaming what they call legacy media, mainstream media, establishment media, whatever you want. It's meant as an insult for something they're actually doing. But maybe the media was doing it first and maybe the media deserves it. I don't know, but that bothers me. The other thing is the real fight is against the corporations, not to destroy them. I am. Capitalism is the way for America. That. That is it. Capitalism is great. But we have reached a situation now where Walmart gets to make its money, distribute it to its shareholders, and we are subsidizing their workers because of how dependent they are on food stamps and social programs because they're not paid enough, that has to change. That's the fight. I wish there was a Trump for that fight. I wish Trump had done that. I thought in 2015 that was what these problems are.

[Unknown Guest]

They understand. They understand that corporations should not be able to write their own regs. Capitalism is great.

[Ian Bremmer]

Great.

[Unknown Guest]

And the reason it's great is because you have companies that are competing against each other. They can win, they can fail. And in an environment where the regulations are actually independent of them, they're not written by them, they're not captured by them. And by the way, capitalism means that you can fail. Capitalism means you need to pay. When you are creating costs, you're not just capitalist with your profits, you're capitalist with your losses. So if you pump carbon in the atmosphere and there's a cost to that, or if you take water for free and it Belongs to the taxpayers. There's a cost to that. Those costs need to be on your books. That's what capitalism is. We don't have that. What we have are capitalists with profits. And suddenly they become socialists when there are losses. Yes, right. That's not capitalism. And people are angry about that.

[Ian Bremmer]

That's what I wanted him to fight.

[Unknown Guest]

He's not fighting that.

[Ian Bremmer]

And Bernie's answer is remotely fighting that. Bernie's answer was socialism that doesn't work. You can't even use the word. Even though Social Security and other entitlement programs are socialistic in their nature and design, you can't use the word. Okay? So you can't use that word. And the Democrats have made that mistake many times over. But that's what I hoped he was going to take on, is that you don't get to have me support your workers while you're dividing profits.

[Unknown Guest]

Look, if Trump wants to get rid of all of these illegal immigrants, which is very, very popular in the United States, let's make it a serious problem for the corporations that are hiring them. Yes, let's actually go in. Why is 98% of Trump's invective focused on the people who are doing everything they can to get in? Because big corporations are very happy to pay them illegally. It seems to me that if you really wanted to solve the problem, you'd go after the driver of the problem.

[Ian Bremmer]

I thought he was gonna do that. Because when you talked about to the extent that Trump is completely responsive to flattery. Yeah, those guys think he's a dope. Nobody attacks Trump more than the corporate class. They think he's a joke. They don't respect him.

[Unknown Guest]

Even more responsive to money than he is to Florida.

[Ian Bremmer]

Yeah, I guess that's turns out.

[Unknown Guest]

And that's why he's such an effective.

[Ian Bremmer]

Businessman in this environment, because nobody disrespects him the way those guys do. You talk to guys on Wall street, they think he's a joke. They think he's a clown. You talk to the tech bros when he's not around. Musk is different because his personality disorder, his autism, makes him a tough read. But they think he's a joke. He doesn't understand. I mean, you're around those guys all the time. They are intellectual snobs. You know, they want to be better than one another. They want to be more fit, they want to be smarter. They want to say that they're in Mensa. They want to play stupid games that they send to each other to see what solves it. Faster. They think he's a. He's a, you know, he's just a complete zero to them. And I thought that that would have harnessed.

[Unknown Guest]

Yeah.

[Ian Bremmer]

His inner drive to bring them to.

[Unknown Guest]

Heel, but I didn't see it. Haven't seen it. I mean, look, there's obviously a fight between the globalists around Trump, Elon, plus the tech bros and a lot of those that have spent a lot of money to get access and the original Core MAGA types, Steve Bannon, et al. And Bannon said in the first term that he was a damaged vessel. And I think that's an appropriate way to look at him. Back in 2017, 2025, when Elon is driving all of these outcomes, then I mean, you would have to argue that the globalists that are capturing the environment are doing a lot more and they're having a lot more impact than Core maga. And in that regard, again, my expectation, that's what my mother would have always expected. Can't trust any of these people. It's not just you can't trust the establishment. You can't trust the people that come in and tell you they're not the establishment because they become the establishment really quickly and they forget about us. And that's why a lot of these people don't vote. That's why a lot of people don't care. That's why a lot of people believe a lot of young men. I saw a stat the other day, really bothered me. 42% of young men in the United States believe that it is fully justified to break the law as leader of the United States in order to get the outcomes you want, because they think you can't actually. The system is so broken that you can no longer work within it. When you have that number of young men that feel that way, you got a problem.

[Ian Bremmer]

We created that problem.

[Unknown Guest]

We are hurting young men in this country in a big way. I am not the most articulate person on that problem, but I see it all the time.

[Ian Bremmer]

Well, it's hard to get more polished on it because every time you say it, you have a significant part of the media culture attack you.

[Unknown Guest]

Yeah.

[Ian Bremmer]

As you know, the. You're lucky if you just get an eye roll and a little baby violin playing that. Oh yeah, poor men, they're just in control of everything. But I gotta tell you, as a father of a young man and of two young women, it is way easier to empower the young women than the young man. He is doing okay, but I see it in him and his friends. They do not see bright futures for themselves. Anyway. Ian Bremmer Always pleasure man.

[Unknown Guest]

You good to see you.

[Ian Bremmer]

You are just value added. Thank you for helping us understand the world around us. Thank you for the food for thought, thank you for what you're doing with your companies, thank you for what you're doing with your social media and thank you for the gift of your friendship it again soon.

[Unknown Guest]

Look forward to it.

[Ian Bremmer]

Appreciate it Ian.

[Chris Cuomo]

Smart guy, knows smart things and helps make it understandable to the rest of us. What do you think of what Ian Bremmer sees about the potential fallout from Trump pushing America within its boundaries, within its borders and away from its alliances? What do you think about it? I'm Chris Cuomo.

[Ian Bremmer]

Thank you for subscribing.

[Chris Cuomo]

Thank you for following. Thank you for checking me out on News Nation, AP and 11p every weekday night. Appreciate you. Appreciate you picking up the free agent gear to show that you're an independent and a critical thinker. Appreciate you.

[Ian Bremmer]

You want this without the ads?

[Chris Cuomo]

Get on my sub stack. You want to know what I'm doing for my fitness as a 50 plus aging athlete? Hip hurt? Neck twisting? Check me out on the substack. It's only five bucks a month. You get the podcast ad free. You get all my fitness stuff. You get what I'm doing for my long Covid. You get my doctor's reckoning of what helps for longevity.

[Ian Bremmer]

All there.

[Chris Cuomo]

Five bucks a month.

[Ian Bremmer]

Check it out.

[Chris Cuomo]

Let me know what you think about it. I'll be doing lives there on a weekly basis that only the subscribers can get. Let's get after it.