Transcript
A (0:00)
Hi, I'm Kristen Bell, and if you know my husband Dax, then you also know he loves shopping for a car. Selling a car, not so much.
B (0:07)
We're really doing this, huh?
A (0:08)
Thankfully, Carvana makes it easy. Answer a few questions, put in your van or license, and done. We sold ours in minutes this morning, and they'll come pick it up and pay us this afternoon.
B (0:19)
Bye, bye, Truckee.
A (0:20)
Of course, we kept the favorite.
B (0:24)
Hello, other Truckee.
A (0:25)
Sell your car with Carvana today. Terms and conditions apply.
B (0:30)
All right, let's talk about Jimmy Kimmel. Now that we've seen how both sides have processed it, we've gotten left and right, and it's time to be reasonable, to understand the law, and then to understand preference, what we know and what we don't know. Okay, Chris Cuomo here. Welcome to the Chris Cuomo Project. And look, this is a tough one for people like me. Why? I am in the free speech business, meaning the marketplace of ideas, Meaning more ideas, more better. Do I think that there need to be standards? Sure, there have to be standards. You should have your standards. I should have my standards. Okay, what about legal standards? We know what they are. Jimmy Kimmel being acted upon, let's say, by Disney. ABC is not about the law. They have the right. And I'll explain why. It doesn't mean that you think what they did is right or that I think what they did is right, but that's about our opinion, not the law. Okay, now, for those who say this is a First Amendment issue. Is it? No, not really. Wait, why am I making space? I'll explain. The First Amendment only applies to government regulation of speech, okay? That's about what the government can do. Not private businesses, except for them violating other laws. Like what? FCC laws, workplace laws, ERISA laws, that kind of stuff. But what is the First Amendment about? Government regulation. So when. Why do you say not really? This is about corporate interest. Okay? Because what if the decision by Disney was made because the Trump administration came down on them and said, you better do this, otherwise whatever you want from us, we're not going to happen. Now, two things, okay? One is I only know what you show. I see these big shot journalists making the case that, you know, this is about a transaction, this is about a future transaction. This is why they're doing it. Where's the proof? Now, correlation is causation. So because Paramount was doing its deal, that's why they settled Trump's lawsuit. Okay? You can have that as an opinion. I didn't like that they settled the lawsuit. I think they should have won. I don't think they were going to lose that 60 Minutes lawsuit. I don't care what you think about the edit of Kamala Harris's interview. They've always edited their interviews. Everybody who does long form journalism edits. It's very rare, live to tape. Very rare. Very rare. You see the whole interview anywhere except on live tv. So that was always a bullshit scenario for me. And I may think that they were influenced, but I don't know why, because I don't have any sourcing on it and I haven't seen any anyway, so. But I can. I can think it. I'm free to think it. Now we're seeing it again. They suspended Jimmy Kimmel. Why didn't they fire him? If it's that kind of pressure, if it's quid pro quo, why didn't they fire him? Why isn't he off who Wants to Be a Millionaire? Why isn't it. They say he's never going to do the Oscars again. Okay? So I don't know. We got to add that into the mix, though. And all these people are saying who it's about, the transaction. One, Are they being transparent about how they feel about Jimmy and whether they're friends of Jimmy? Because I got to tell you, I hear people arguing that this seems to be about a corporation caving to something political. I didn't hear that when it was me, from these same people, when it was a mob effect, coming after my employer because they didn't like that I was helping my brother and that there was pressure being put on. And I don't know that that wasn't also coming from the administration that didn't like my brother. I don't know. I don't know whether they did. I don't know whether they didn't. But nobody was being speculative about that. Why they felt differently about me than they do about Jimmy Kimmel. That's okay. I feel differently about my situation than I do about Jimmy Kimmel. I actually think my situation was more complicated than Jimmy's. What we're being told is that this is about him saying that Charlie Kirk's assassin was a MAGA guy. Now, do you have the right to be wrong? I would argue yes. Yes, there is a right to be wrong in terms of the government punishing you for saying things that they think that are wrong for you to say. Now, with very rare exceptions, okay? Because the jurisprudence, the law movement, the evolution has been to protect more and more speech. If you go back to the seminal case about let's say hate speech, fighting words. Okay? That used to be like, oh, ya mama, you know, you stupid guinea Fredo. Okay, Those used to be fighting words, which was if you say something like that, you have a reasonable expectation of when you say it to me, of me going bam. Right? You have a reasonable expectation of it. So when I hit you, don't be upset because you said something that was reasonably calculated to get your fucking ass beat. Now, we have seen since Chaplinsky in 1942, whatever the case was, the law has expanded. You saw it in the 70s, into the 2000s. It's every time it's tested, really, they've said we need to be a little bit more expansive. So now the test is you have to have a specific and imminent threat that you are speaking to, right? Like these fucking fill in the blanks of people I hate. Let's go beat their ass right now in the corner of 5th and Elm. And let's find Greg Ott and do him first. Now, the speech is dictating action in a way that is specific and imminent, and maybe they would come after you for it as part of the criminal element of whatever follows. Okay? That's the law. So did Disney violate the law? Not unless you can prove that they did this because the government was making them do it and not on the basis of this being proscribed hate speech, which I don't think it is. I think Jimmy Kimmel was wrong. Why? Because I don't see any indication this guy's. The assassin's family voted for Trump. Okay, so he was raised by people who voted for Trump. Does that make him a Trumper? Every piece of allegation, proof that they have suggested is that that's not what this is. And we haven't heard the roommates say we didn't have those conversations. We haven't heard the parents say he didn't come forward and admit it to us and that he hadn't been getting more and more angry about Charlie Kirk. And we don't know where that influence came from or not. I'll tell you what, what I think is being ignored in the Charlie Kirk assassin situation is how nonchalant he was, how delusional he was in thinking, oh, my, they're going to be really mad at me because I used my granddad's gun or my dad's gun. That's what you thought they were going to be mad at you about? I think I got away without a trace. Really? You thought that. You didn't think you were on video and Pictures all over the place being shown right after the event. So this guy seems like he wasn't right in the head. He wasn't thinking right. He was nonchalant. His roommate seemed, you know, text is tone free basically, but seemed shocked. Certainly didn't seem to know what was going to happen. Now Jimmy says It was a MAGA guy. MAGA's trying to make this political. Do I think he's wrong? Yeah. Do I think he has the right to say it? 100%. Does his employer have the right to fire him for it? Yeah, I think they do. But what if I don't like that they fired him for it? That is your choice too. And you don't have to pay any money to Disney. You don't have to ever watch any of their stuff or anything like that if you feel that way. Did Disney have the right to fire him? Yeah. Unless we can show that this was wrongful termination because of government pressure. And that's a pretty high bar. Just because you think it doesn't really mean anything. You got to show it, right? Because this is going to be a legal matter. You don't have to like it. You can punish them for it. Support comes from AG1 and MAN. I use them every day. I'm one and done. One scoop of AG1 into some warm water. I drink it. I've got what I need to get my nutrition straight right at the beginning of the day. Okay. That is my morning routine. Now AG1 has helped me optimize my nighttime routine. AGZ is the nightly drink that helps me wind down and get better rest. How? AGZ is a melatonin free formula with clinically study herbs, adaptogens and minerals that help you unwind, relax and have deeper restorative sleep. Remember, I love AG because they do the work. Okay. AG1AGZ. This is about a function of their clinical testing and it helps you make the most of your day. Helps your body and mind wind down. If you take AGZ before bed, optimize your sleep quality. Quality. Wake up feeling better. No grogginess. The herbal flavor perfect puts you in the wind down mindset. There are no artificial flavors, no artificial sweeteners, no added sugar. Okay, let's keep it pure. That's what AGZ is. If you're ready to turn down the stress and focus on the rest, head to drink. AG1.com CCP for the Chris Cuomo Project to get a free fall Frother. Frother. And you need that frother really helps you with the mix and you'll get it with your first purchase of AGZ. That's drinkag1.com CCP this episode is brought to you by onit. Most multivitamins do the bare minimum on it total human does more, much more. These amp impacts support focus, cellular energy, immunity, sleep and more with a curated blend science backed vitamins and nootropics giving you full mind and body optimization. On it total human unlock your peak performance. Visit on it.com for 15 off. Subscribe and save. Now to the extent that I have a conflict on this, why? Because my employer's boss owns stations that run Jimmy Kimmel's show and they had said they wanted to pull him before ABC Disney pulled him all together. Okay, here's what I have to say about that. They hired me and I'm not a known MAGA guy, nor will I ever be. And I will never be generous to either party because I think the two party system is killing us. My bosses know that and they hired me anyway. So the idea that they are MAGA or bust is demonstrably bullshit. Otherwise I wouldn't be there. Oh, you're MAGA now? Fuck you if you think that about me. Straight up, straight up fuck you. And here's why. Because I don't do this for free. Not just monetarily, personally. I got people threatening me, threatening my family real enough that I have to pay for private security. I don't want to hear it, okay? You may not like my opinions, but do not think that I'm hiding a fucking loyalty, okay? What I am, I tell you I am. When I'm wrong and I realize it, I tell you I am. Why? That's the way I do the job. I am not a MAGA supporter. Why? I don't believe in these movements, okay? I think socialism remedies for affordability, which is real, is not the remedy. I think the remedies that you've been pitched by MAGA and now this reaction formation to it on the left are bad remedies. I think the problems are real. I even think some of the cultural problems are real. I just don't like the solutions that are being offered up by these packs of angry people. I get why they're angry. I get that people are making you angry. In fact, that's part of the Jimmy Kimmel thing. You have so called self respecting journalists trying to get you angry about these issues. And I think they're doing it because that's what gets you paid these days. And there's no question that I am doing something that is business dumb, which is. I will not pick a side. I will say when each side seems to have the righteous cause and when they seem to be bullshit. So this is not a First Amendment issue unless you can show there was government regulation of it. And just because you feel like that, just because Trump can be obnoxious in terms of how he discusses his critics and what should be done to them, that's not the same thing. And I felt the same way about the Biden administration with the laptop. And I think there was a lot more evidence there that there was absolute government intervention in how that was dealt with as a function of speech in the media. And I didn't see these same people bitching them. Why? Because they have political preferences. Okay. And that's okay. That's okay. But it is part of the problem. Okay? You're going to have preferences. Human beings have preferences. So Jimmy Kimmel is not wrong because it's a violation of his First Amendment rights. Unless you can prove that the government made Disney do this, and I have no reason to believe that, could I be suspicious? Yeah, but that's not how a legal situation works. And that can be really frustrating sometimes. For instance, I think Luigi Mangione is 100% straight up a domestic terrorist, period. Judge said that they didn't present enough evidence that him killing the healthcare CEO was terroristic in nature. But the grand jury said it was right. And the judge within the law has the purview, has the power to say, yeah, I didn't find the evidence that they based their allegation on, which is the lowest level, just probable cause. I met that burden of probable cause. I'm removing those charges now. I don't agree. But the law has a standard now, that's what really matters here with Jimmy Kimmel. What is the standard? The standard is what his employer feels is good for their brand. That is not about free speech. Okay? It is about getting paid. Disney made a business decision. In fact, I'll give you a fact that nobody has mentioned about this. And again, I have a conflict. I work for nextar, Right? They own News Nation. My defense of my fairness on this is if they were what you're saying they are or what some are suggesting, I wouldn't be here. If they really had worries about getting their deal through. They would not hire a guy that the President of the United States on a regular basis has a problem with because of how I do my job. Okay. I'll just put that out there. I'll also put this out there. They don't own a lot of ABC stations, but I do know that there are two most watched ones. One is in Salt Lake City, one is in Tennessee. Those are two trumpy ass places, okay? So as a business consideration, they gotta be taking a beat. I don't know this as a matter of fact, but I do know that's where their two biggest ABC stations are. And as a business decision, you want to please your community. And the Salt Lake City community in Tennessee, I'm sure, are not happy about what Jimmy Kimmel said, blaming the assassination on maga. So that's a business decision. You don't have to like it. They have a right to do it. It's not illegal. It may be not right in your judgment. It may be wrong. And I think we've seen corporations make wrong judgments. You know, I'm a supporter of the woke movement and what it was supposed to be about. MeToo movement. Okay? Not everything that's woke I'm in favor of. But empowering groups that have been forced into silence by our culture I thought was a noble cause. Do I think it was executed with nobility? No, not always and in all ways. But corporations did things then that they thought would be good for their brand. And that's part of business.
