Loading summary
A
Hi, I'm Kristen Bell, and if you know my husband Dax, then you also know he loves shopping for a car. Selling a car, not so much.
B
We're really doing this, huh?
A
Thankfully, Carvana makes it easy. Answer a few questions, put in your van or license and done. We sold ours in minutes this morning and they'll come pick it up and pay us this afternoon.
B
Bye bye, Truckee.
A
Of course, we kept the favorite.
B
Hello, other Truckee.
A
Sell your car with Carvana today. Terms and conditions apply.
B
You want to know what beats MAGA in the midterms? You want to know how to win a debate when it comes to what's happening in Washington, D.C. right now? Well, you're in the right place and people are making a lot of the wrong moves. Chris Cuomo here. Welcome to the Chris Cuomo Project. This is the simplest way I can put it for you. The mistake is questioning the problem instead of focusing on the best solutions. Okay, now some of you will eye roll me high minded. I'm just pissed. Listen, Howard Beal is an archetype in my business and in our culture for a reason. Go Google him and watch his little mad as hell when I'm not gonna take it anymore clip. Why did it resonate? Boy, do people feel that way. Wow, is it truthful. And that was in the 1970s. It's just as true today, maybe more so. But here's the mistake. People keep arguing because Trump does something about a real problem. And because they oppose Trump and oppose his motivations and maybe even oppose his operations, they wind up overstepping the position into seeming to be in favor of whatever the problem is. Like what? Immigration. The deference to humanity that I think exists more on the left than on the right. Of course, you could say no, because the people on the right actually want to enforce the laws and give the dignity of these people the right way to come in. And instead of letting it languish and let it be all right, you can argue about it any way you want. I have my opinion, you have yours. But what I'm saying is the overreach was pretending it wasn't a problem. And that gave Trump an opportunity even if his fixes were too heavy handed. We're wrong, we're misdirected, we're exaggerated, we're malicious. And I feel like that when it comes to ice. I feel for those men and women doing the job. I get why they're worried about getting doxxed and worried about their families. But I do not believe that you can have law enforcement running around in masks in America. It's not who we are. And you gotta think about who you are and who you wanna be. And you have to be that way. And I know it's hard. I fail at it in my own life every day. Imagine how more complicated and difficult it is to do as a group of someones instead of just one person. I get it. It's hard. That's why it's about the effort and how you direct the effort. And when you miss the problem because you are against the solutions, you fuck up your ability to connect to the majority. Because the majority wants law and order, the majority wants to be safe. And yes, there are a lot of things and assumptions and biases that play into what that looks and feels like for different kinds of people. But let's take Washington D.C. the left and those who oppose MAGA. And look, I mean, I don't have to say this, but I'm not a MAGA guy. Why? Because I don't believe in empty outrage. I am not an lefty fringe opposite of maga, whatever they decide to call themselves. Why? Because I am not about empty outrage and misguided solutions. But I didn't make the mistake with maga, nor am I making it with the populist reaction to it on the left of negating people's feelings about their grievance. Are people wrong to be worried about the state of culture and values in America? No, they're not wrong. There are a lot of real concerns and issues that many we ignore and some we take on the wrong way. But the remedies for those things, throwing out everyone who entered this country illegally, no matter how, no matter the circumstances, no matter what they've done once they've been here, even though that there was an obvious system of nonchalance through Democrat and Republican administrations, yes, it hit its nadir during Biden and created political advantage for Trump. But the idea that there hasn't been a suggestion that was nothing like subtle to people, that if you can get in here, you'll be able to stay and live the life that you want now. Wrong message to send. Okay, fine. But that's the message you sent. And the idea of rounding them all up is not only not feasible, it's not only probably not legal, but it's also, I don't think. Right, okay. Not everybody who comes in the wrong way is the same. I really believe that. You don't have to. I'm not asking for your vote, so don't worry about it. But you overstepped the problem. On the left because you didn't like the person who wanted to solve it and you should have been just messing with his solutions. ICE is overreaching. They're being made to overreach. I don't blame the men and women doing the job. Oh, they should quit. No, I don't believe that. Um, they're doing a job. They're doing the job they're told to do. Just like it's like saying all soldier soldiers should drop arms if they don't agree with every single thing of a political aspect of what's happening in their conflict. It's not how it works. So the mistake. And we'll see this heading into the midterms. Don't miss the problem because of your problems with the proposed solutions. Don't miss the problem. MAGA people are a bunch of bigots for being worried about. Fill in the blank mistake. You're negating their grievance. Okay? And all that does is galvanize and push you away. Same thing on the left. Affordability is a real problem. Okay? It's a problem in major cities. It's a problem all over this country. That's true. Socialism is not the solution. Okay? Free this. Raising taxes, finding ways to squeeze the top as much as you can. They will leave. I don't care if they leave. Yeah, you do. Yeah, you do. And what that means, the message it sends. Defund the police. All of these extreme notions are highly debatable and flawed. That's where my space is. You're not wrong to want rent to be lower. You're not wrong to want more gainful employment. You're not wrong to want to be safe. You're not wrong for male and female to still be a thing. You're not wrong. You're not wrong to want to feel that being a Christian is left alone as much as being a Muslim. I get it. You may perceive it in a different way than I do. You may have an exaggerated or a mitigated sense of what matters and why than I do. But that's okay. That's what debate's for. That's what elections are for. The winner of the midterms is going to be the party that connects to the concerns of the majority and the issues that are presented before them. Support comes from American financing. Now we are addicted to consumer credit. We are overwhelmed with consumer credit. We need help when it comes to. To consumer credit. A lot of us are paying 20% or more to banks you call American financing. That can change. They have mortgage rates in the fives Right now they're showing people every day how to keep more of their money and pay less in interest. American Financing is helping homeowners especially save an average of 800 bucks a month. How the equity in your home is there risk? Is there something you have to think through? Does it have to be done right? Yes, yes and yes. But there's no upfront freeze, there's no obligation. It's a 10 minute call to a salary based mortgage consultant. Why? There's no pressure to upsell. And here's the kicker. If you start today, you could delay 2 of your mortgage payments and that will put even more cash in your hands right away. I think you should give them a call and check it out. Call American financing right now. 866-88-9424-286688-94242 or you can just go to americanfinancing.net and do a slash and put my name Cuomo americanfinancing.net Cuomo this episode is brought to you by LifeLock. Between two factor authentication, strong passwords and a VPN, you try to be in control of how your info is protected. But many other places also have it and they might not be as careful. That's why LifeLock monitors hundreds of millions of data points a second for threats. If your identity is stolen, they'll fix it, guaranteed or your money back. Save up to 40% your first year. Visit lifelock.com podcast for 40% off terms apply again. The winner of the midterms is going to be the party that connects with the majority in this country on the common concerns as the are presented before them. What does that mean? Of course, economics. But in what way? I think it's going to be a referendum on the tariffs and whether or not this was too heavy handed. But don't make the mistake again. I'm anti tariffs. Even if they bring back production jobs, Even if they wind up making more money for America than it was before it. No, I'm not against America doing better in trade deals. I'm not against having more manufacturing just because it's Trump saying he wants to do it. It's his solutions I disagree with. Tariffing everyone as high as you could everywhere all at once was too much. And you have created price pressure that is now starting to manifest itself in what matters most on the economy. Pocketbook economic politics. Okay. Prices are going up. They are denying it, they're denying it, they're denying it. But the trend is not their friend. Okay. And I don't think monetary Policy can correct enough. Given how much has been flooded in already with, with all the quantitative easing, I think it's going to be a problem, and that's going to be the economy. Now, an issue like DC is a great distraction from that. Why? Because if you are against what Trump is doing, that means you are pro CR crime. Because what he's doing is trying to reduce crime. Is that what he's really trying to do? I don't know. It's what he says he's doing. Well, I think that what he's doing is trying to show that he can be an authoritarian in places that are known for being brown and blue. Meaning Democrat. Maybe. Maybe there are, I think, just fewer than two dozen cities in this country where you have more black people than white people. Well, who cares? Well, I wouldn't, except for the purpose of this analysis, D.C. is one of them. Is that why he picked D.C. i don't know. He's in D.C. so that makes sense. And could there be other reasons? Yes, but I don't know that because he hasn't stated them. He says that the crime is high there. Everybody's worried about it. Now, does that hold up? Uh, yeah. Crime is a problem in Washington, D.C. now. Can you do a comparison? Yes, but don't miss the problem. Don't say, don't do anything to help crime in D.C. Mr. President, because there are other things that matter more. Because now you don't seem like you care about crime. And D.C. does have a crime problem. Now, the right thing to do is two different avenues of attack. Okay. Strategy and tactics. Strategy and tactics. Strategy is about the philosophy. Why D.C. because you're there. Okay, I accept that. You're there. Okay. Why else? Because statistically, D.C. is not where you start. Statistically, it's not where you start. In fact, the red states, this now leads credibility to the tactic. The strategy is, what do you want to do? You want to reduce crime in big cities? Sending in the National Guard is not how to do it. Bringing in federal authorities that aren't used to operating in those areas or with those systems or services is not the way to do it. You have to look at what is causing crime in each of those municipalities and deal with it. And it's not. Look, D.C. is a great place to start. Our analysis of it being the wrong place to start. Based on what? Law enforcement presence per capita. D.C. has one of the highest ratios between federal and municipal of boots on the ground, if you want to call them that. You know, people on the street, law enforcement, whatever you want, they have a ton of them. So then why do they still have crime? Because that's not what it's just about. It's not just about punishing, it's not just about presence. It's about poverty, it's about culture, it's about avenues of opportunity or lack thereof. Okay, now how do we know this? Because it is being addressed in cities all across the country. And you know who's doing it in most cases? Ambitious young mayors. Or not age wise, but ambitious mayors of these places. And a lot of them are Democrats. So for instance, I was gonna go after the red states that are offering to send national guard to Washington D.C. when they have their own crime problems that are the same or worse than what's happening in Washington D.C. which just makes the point that this is a red versus blue thing and a little bit of the brown man boogeyman being sprinkled in there by these places. Until I got to Ohio and I was like, oh, their capital crime is actually going down in Columbus. And then I did a little bit more research and it turns out even though they have this nonpartisan mayor system there, he's a Democrat, the guy, and he's doing things that are very intelligent about how to reduce crime in his specific community of Columbus by doing more than just punishing everybody. That you have to meet your people, where you find them and what their needs are and what the deficiencies are and what the challenges are. And he's doing that. And it's been going well, well for him. And that's the real message here. It's not about the problem. Crime is real. People want to be safe. They're not safe enough in too many places. How, how is the fight? No, not National Guard. National Guard's not going to do it. No, not federal task force agencies. It's not going to get it done. You got to create opportunities for these people. You know, one of the fastest things. Look up one of the metrics for yourself. Percentage of people arrested for property crimes who are employed. Let's see. First thing you're going to find is that we don't measure this stuff well enough. If you want the federal government involved in policing, we should get them involved first in the data collection because that's where they actually can do something. And we don't have great stats on crime. And I've always felt it's because we don't care enough about what to do about it except to make political hay out of it. Support comes from incogni. You know, I don't know if you've picked up on this, but it's really become painfully apparent to me. So many of the companies I interact with, especially on the Internet, collect, aggregate, sell, trade, use my data. And that's not what I'm signing up for now. You have the right to request that data brokers delete what information they have about you and protect your privacy. But it's not that easy if you don't know how to do it. And the bad news is, you know, it really could take you forever to do it by yourself. Incogni can do the messy work for you automatically. Incogni helps you protect your privacy and take your personal data off the market by reaching out to data brokers on your behalf, requesting your personal data removal, and dealing with their objections. That's the key part. Incogni has the personnel and the expertise to get it done. What do they hold on to? Your name, your email, your home address, your gender, your phone number, education, relatives, Social Security number, employment history, shopping habits, you know, and it's just such a nuisance. So Incogni makes life simpler online. Take your personal data back with Incogni. Use the code Cuomo at the link below, and you'll get 60% off an annual plan. Go to Incogni I N C o G N I.com Cuomo Now, Incogni is sponsoring this video, but I wouldn't be saying it if I didn't believe in the need for it and Incogni's ability to deliver. So check it out for yourself. My video sponsor is Incogni, and they're worth a checkout.
A
Hey, guys, have you heard of Gold Belly? It's this amazing site where they ship the most iconic famous foods from restaurants across the country, anywhere nationwide. I've never found a more perfect gift than food. Gold Belly Ship Chicago deep dish pizza, New York bagels, Maine lobster rolls, and even Ina Garden's famous cakes. So if you're looking for a gift for the food lover in your life, head to goldbelly.com and get 20% off your first order with promo code GIFT. That's goldbelly.com promo code GIFT.
B
So the mistake that's being made with DC is it's easy to say this is racist. Okay? Is it? Maybe. Maybe not. Doesn't get you to where you want to be, which is connecting to the majority. Because there are more people in this country, I would wager, who believe that more police equals more better than the opposite. Okay, now you may want to have that fight. I don't I want to have whether this is the best way to reduce crime in this area, okay? And you don't need a. God forbid, you don't need National Guardsmen to spray automatic rounds and kill a bunch of people for it to be the wrong way to solve the problem. And what you do is you show that the percentage of people who get convicted of property crimes who are employed, a job, a job that gives you dignity, that gives you a sense of purpose and worth, okay? That is the way that you bring down crime, giving people another avenue to dignity. Not that there's that much dignified about crime, but there is something psychological about providing and surviving. And I'm not justifying crime, of course I'm anti crime, but it's how do you deal with it? And that's what you should be fighting with Trump. Not that he's trying to fight crime, but how he's trying to fight it. Because one way you look like some mushy pro crime lefty, and the other way you look like somebody who's just got better ideas that you should be addressing. What actually makes the biggest difference when it comes to safety and law enforcement and low crime, which is what? Well, that the laws are real and the enforcement is real and the incarceration is real and it's fair and it's consistent. But, but, but instead of just dealing with the outcomes, it's what goes into those outcomes. What are the programs in place? How does that economy work? How does that education system work? How does the family services work in that place? This all matters as much or more. Fight about those, if you care. Dare to do the right things, not just the most obvious things. That's what you should be hearing. But time and time again, we see that this lesson has not been learned. What is the mistake that the left made with Bernie? Bernie picked the right grievance at the right time. He was ahead of Trump on the MAGA grievance. He was ahead, but forget about his personal packaging. Socialism is not the right answer for America. And they didn't learn. And now they're doing the same thing with their populist reformation that they did with Bernie, which is they are embracing radical, irrational solutions. They're right about the problem, they're wrong about the remedy. Just like my feelings about maga. They didn't learn the Bernie problem. They didn't learn the immigration problem. Okay? They didn't learn the California problem. When people see people running all over the streets to burning up cars and attacking people and property, they like a show of force. You're wrong if you think that doesn't work in America. It does and it should not. Because we should be shooting our own when they protest. Of course not. And I hate that I have to say that I hate that every word that comes out of my mouth can be twisted and weaponized. Because we're in a constant game of gotcha of point for point and rhetorical bullshit instead of dealing holistically with what we say we care about. It is all opportunism and advantage all the time. Nobody gives a shit about getting to a better place except for their own personal brand. And that's really what's holding us back. That really is the root cause of it. We are not in it together. There is no collective concern or cause. It's all about advantage over the other and your own ability to make a space for yourself with your platform and score points. And you're going to do that with insults more than with insights. And you're going to do it with negativity. Why? Because it's what works. It's what works. It's what plays to the human sympathies. And Trump knows that and he does it really well. And no, I am not a MAGA guy. Why is that the conclusion? Because I'm telling Democrats what they're doing wrong. Wouldn't that be suggestive to you that I'm trying to help? I mean, what the fuck is going on here these days? I need some podcast listening person who's lucky if they vote, telling me, who grew up at the knee of one of the greatest Democratic orators in a generation. And the second guy was my older brother who was a three term New York governor, 18 different campaigns. No cameras, no media. Whether it was Dinkins or Obama or Clinton or Gore or Reagan or Bush or d' Amato or all these other names that you don't even know of. People who are positions in power that I watched and listened to and spoke to outside of cameras, not as a member of the media. So you get what they really believe. And I need you to tell me what a Democrat is. I mean, the arrogance. I get what a fucking Democrat is. I don't get what you've done to the party. It doesn't work. AOC is a great, great political player. She has a degree of charisma that is befuddling to me, but she hasn't. She has passion, she has constituency, she has purpose. But her remedies suck. And so the righteousness of her cause, which is there, is in my opinion, ruined by remedies. That will never matter to the majority. And that's what's happening in dc. And that is the mistake that we keep seeing made, that you are now in a position where people can look at the MAGA folks and say, look, they don't even give a shit about the crime in D.C. because it's Trump. They don't even want him to do anything about the crime he's offering to help, and they don't want it to just because it's Trump. Support comes from Beam. You know, people think podcasting is just sitting down and talking into a mic. And look, there's certainly very low qualifications for how people get into this business. But you know, if you're a critical thinker, the job isn't over when the mic gets turned off. Between the planning of episodes, researching the topic and you know, where you think you've said everything you've ever said, but you need new ideas and you got to figure it out. And you're trying to figure out how other people are doing it and what will be helpful and how will it break through. I knew I needed something that helped me kind of check out of that process okay, and not just knock me out, but, you know, to feel like me, but just a more relaxed version. That's when I found Beam's Dream Powder. Okay. Now it's a game changer. All natural and it helps you go to sleep without waking up like you're hungover. Science backed ingredients designed to help you fall asleep, stay asleep and wake up refreshed. And it's tasty. Plus, for a limited time, Beam has given my listeners their best offer yet. 40% off. You get their best selling Dream Powder and you get up to 40% off. For a limited time. Go to shop Beam b e a m.com cuomo use the code Cuomo at checkout. That's B as in Bravo E a m as in mike.com cuomo use the code cuomo. You'll get 40% off. Hablas espanol Sprito Joyce if you used.
A
Babbel, you would Babbel's conversation based techniques teaches you useful words and phrases to get you speaking quickly about the things you actually talk about in the real world. With lessons handcrafted by over 200 language experts and voiced by real native speakers, Babbel is like having a private tutor in your pocket. Start speaking with Babbel today. Get up to 55% off your Babbel subscription right now at babbel.com Spotify spelled B A B-B-E L.com Spotify rules and restrictions may apply.
B
Now. Are you guys wrong? Are people wrong to be suspicious of Trump and his motives? No. He's given you every reason to be. Now, do I agree with your suspicions? No, I don't. I don't think he's a Nazi. I don't think he's Hitler. I don't think he does what he does because he is exclusively a bigot or a despot in waiting and that he's not going to leave and he's going to create a police state and he's going to. I don't believe any of those things. Could I be wrong? Yeah. My son could also grow to be six. Six. I'd be surprised by that as well, because it doesn't seem to be right. He's already taller than I am. But that shouldn't happen. That would be outside the expectation. No, it isn't. He says all these things that Hitler did. No, he doesn't. No, he doesn't. Well, no. This is the way it started in 1938. I get the fears. I get the fears, especially among Jewish people, although they don't see Trump as their biggest enemy. The Nazi thing is ironically about non Jews and how they feel about versus what Jews think about who's a Nazi and who isn't, which is kind of weird. And another expression of how manipulated our politics is now about who gets to own what grievance and when. But I don't have to agree with you that he is the devil for me to disagree with his remedies and solutions. And it doesn't make me a MAGA guy, because I say bravo to America for trying to bring peace to Ukraine and to the Middle East. Especially when you're against two entities there, players who don't want peace, who profit from problems, Putin and Hamas. Oh, you're a Trumper now? What are you talking about? America doesn't have to be in the peace in Ukraine or Israel business. You don't see Italy or France or Germany putting forth the political capital and the influence and the money that we are. Bravo to us. America matters. For all her flaws, all her faults, all the hypocrisy, all of what she doesn't and isn't that she could and should be. America has a special place in this world and it matters. And we're seeing that in those two situations. Did he over promise? Of course he over promised. Of course he did. That is his political persuasion. That's how he does it. If you don't like it, don't vote for him. We've had three elections with the guy already. What I'm saying is me saying bravo for trying to make peace doesn't mean the way he's trying to make peace is the right way. Me saying great, you want to fight crime, Great. Let's talk about how and let's talk about where and let's talk about why. That's the conversation to have. It's not the conversation we're having. We're having a conversation that makes people who are resistant to what he do he's doing look like they care about the wrong things. And I don't think that's the case, but I think that's the way it's playing out. You have to learn the lesson of not negating the problem because you want to negate the person trying to solve it. Focus on the solutions. That's how you win the midterms. Did tariffs help or hurt? Looked at through the lens of every household economy in this country. That's the framing for the economic issue or it should be what will be the social issue? I can't tell you right now. You guys are too fickle. The cycles are too fast. It's too random. I don't know. But I will tell you, if you focus on who is to blame or why it is or what it's about, you're going to lose if you focus on the solutions. Trans. The idea that a guy like me shouldn't be playing high school girls volleyball, that's a no brainer. The argument is not to say no, it's okay. Don't say anything about that 230 pound guy throwing my daughter on the ground because I feel for him. No, it's yes, that shouldn't happen. And we don't have to negate all trans people because of doesn't have to be 230 pound guys playing girls volleyball or any kid at any age can decide to chop their genitals off. This is not where we should be. That is not live and let live. That is not about the reasonable nature of solutions to problems. It's just negating problems. I don't want there to be trans people. Okay, fine, as an opinion, but not a reasonable remedy in a pluralistic society. I want them to be able to do whatever they want. It doesn't matter if it's unfair because other things are unfair about them. And there are other things that are more unfair than this. No, you're. You're now in favor of something that's wrong which makes you no better than what you say you oppose. Oh, yeah, but there's a greater good. I don't buy that. You got to be very careful with moral relativism. The remedy is to have a rule structure where trans people are given every advantage of any other type, but they're not given an advantage that disadvantages any other type of. That can be done. That's what must be done, and that's the way to discuss it. And, yeah, it's a niche issue. I mean, look, it isn't. It isn't. Okay. It's not a niche issue to the families that are affected by what they see as unfair play. But much, much, much more important to me because it's a much, much bigger number are the kids who suffer all over this country because they're targeted for being trans. And the many people who are trans who are in agony about their sense of self and what they need help with and how they have to be understood and accommodated within society. That's a much bigger concern to me. And by demonizing them, which is what happens when you adopt this absolutist nature against people who already don't understand or don't like what these people are, you're asking for trouble, and that's what you've gotten. And now we see it again with DC where, look, you. You know, you know, we answer our comments here. To me, it seems like Trump wants to get rid of crime in D.C. even if it means breaking some glass. And the left is saying, no, leave it alone. Don't do it, because we don't like how you're doing it without having a better way to do it. And I think that's a mistake. I think it's a political loss, and I think it disconnects them from the majority, and they're at risk of losing the midterms. I mean, look, the Senate, if you look at Kalshee or any of these expectation markets, it's really the House that's in play because the margin is so small. But the idea that Democrats are gonna win because people hate Trump, that's not why. That's not why, because they already hold those seats. Okay, look, let me teach you a little something about what's happening with the gerrymandering, which, again, is another example of this poor Elbridge Gerry. He really gets hit with that gerrymandering. And really, the reason he did it early on was nowhere near as nefarious as what it is today. But that's how it goes. Gerrymandering is another one where you're missing the better solution, by negating the problem, Texas is going to manipulate it to get more seats. Okay, first of all, is this done? Yes. Has it ever been done this way before by Democrats? No. They have never done it at the direction of the President and manipulated it without connection to census. So, no, they haven't done that, but they're doing it now. Okay, so is the reaction to that to do it in California? Politically, right now, the left wants the answer to be yes. It is harsh and it's fighting fire with fire. Fire. And it's Gavin Newsom using caps like Trump and playing Trump's game. I think it's a mistake. I think the reason that you will win because you already hold all those seats. That's what gerrymandering is all about. Places that don't like Trump, they're all Democrats already. They're very, very, very, very, very few purple districts because these two fucking parties manipulate our political system for their advantage, not yours. The real argument to have is about not just, oh, this is the system we got, Chris, we gotta go with it. If that's the way it was, we would have never gotten rid of enslaved people in this country, because that's how it was. Also, certain things are wrong, okay? And a constitutional republic where you don't have the population really determining the outcome of things is wrong. So go to the solution. It's not just to cheat when they cheat. It's to expose how this happens at the state level and to pursue legitimate avenues to change it. Don't negate the problem. Fight over the solution, okay? Whether it's the economy with affordability, whether it's about policing, whether it's about immigration, whether it's about culture, whether it's about our political process. B, about better. Be in the business of better. You will expose your opponents for being the cheap, obvious, hollow grievance mongers that they are. And you will prove to the majority that for whatever their misgivings and disaffection is, they know that your idea is better. For how to fix that is what needs to be focused on if you want to win the midterms or any conversation about anything that matters. I'm Chris Cuomo. Thank you for subscribing and following. Thank you for checking me out on News Nation, 8p and 11p every weekday night. And I'm pushing you to be independent because these parties are poisonous. They're getting more extreme. They're making us more extreme. Be a critical thinker. Be a free agent. That's enough. Let's get after it.
Episode: Why Democrats Are Handing Trump a WIN in DC
Date: August 26, 2025
Host: Chris Cuomo
In this episode, Chris Cuomo takes a critical look at how Democrats are mishandling crime policy debates—specifically, how their opposition to Trump’s moves in Washington, D.C. ends up politically backfiring. Cuomo argues that by focusing too much on the flaws or motives behind Trump’s actions—rather than acknowledging public concerns about crime and offering practical policy alternatives—the left risks alienating the majority of Americans and essentially “handing Trump a win.” Throughout, Cuomo draws parallels to immigration, economics, and culture wars, urging both parties to prioritize real solutions over partisan grievances.
Democrats’ Error: Cuomo blames Democrats and the left for overly focusing on opposing Trump himself, rather than confronting and addressing the actual issues Trump leverages for political advantage—such as crime in D.C., immigration, and economic affordability.
Quote:
"The mistake is questioning the problem instead of focusing on the best solutions." (00:33)
Opposition to Trump, says Cuomo, too often spills into denying problems exist—thereby looking dismissive of genuine public concerns and ceding political ground.
"You overstepped the problem. On the left because you didn't like the person who wanted to solve it and you should have been just messing with his solutions." (02:45)
"If you are against what Trump is doing, that means you are pro crime. Because what he's doing is trying to reduce crime. Is that what he's really trying to do? I don't know. It's what he says he's doing." (11:18)
"The majority wants law and order, the majority wants to be safe." (02:15)
"Are people wrong to be worried about the state of culture and values in America? No, they're not wrong." (03:08)
Police & National Guard: Criticizes the blunt solutions like deploying National Guard, favoring nuanced, locally-driven policies led by mayors.
"Sending in the National Guard is not how to do it. Bringing in federal authorities that aren't used to operating in those areas... is not the way to do it." (13:34)
Data and Opportunity: Advocates for better data collection and addressing underlying issues like poverty, opportunity, and employment.
"You got to create opportunities for these people. ... If you want the federal government involved in policing, we should get them involved first in the data collection." (15:52)
Cuomo links Democratic failures on crime and immigration to earlier missteps with Bernie Sanders and populism—right about the problems, wrong on the remedies.
"They're right about the problem, they're wrong about the remedy. Just like my feelings about MAGA." (20:58)
Warns that embracing radical or impractical policies alienates moderates:
"AOC is a great, great political player... But her remedies suck. ... The righteousness of her cause ... is, in my opinion, ruined by remedies that will never matter to the majority." (23:59)
Cuomo distances himself from Trump and MAGA, pushes back on apocalyptic language but acknowledges skepticism about Trump is warranted.
"Do I agree with your suspicions? No, I don't. I don't think he's a Nazi. I don't think he's Hitler. ... But I don't have to agree with you that he is the devil for me to disagree with his remedies and solutions." (27:07)
Praises attempting peace in Ukraine and Israel, but not necessarily Trump’s methods.
"The idea that a guy like me shouldn't be playing high school girls volleyball, that's a no brainer. ... The remedy is to have a rule structure where trans people are given every advantage of any other type, but they're not given an advantage that disadvantages any other type." (29:13)
"It's not just to cheat when they cheat. It's to expose how this happens at the state level and to pursue legitimate avenues to change it." (32:35)
On populist mistakes:
"They're right about the problem, they're wrong about the remedy." (20:58)
On the dangers of missing the problem:
"Don't miss the problem because of your problems with the proposed solutions. Don't miss the problem." (03:24)
On self-defeating tribalism:
"We are not in it together. There is no collective concern or cause. It's all about advantage over the other and your own ability to make a space for yourself with your platform and score points. And you're going to do that with insults more than with insights." (24:59)
On trans debates:
"The remedy is to have a rule structure where trans people are given every advantage ... but they're not given an advantage that disadvantages any other type. That can be done. That's what must be done, and that's the way to discuss it." (29:13)
Chris Cuomo delivers a pointed, nonpartisan critique of political strategy on the American left, especially as it pertains to crime, D.C., and how opposition to Trump often becomes counterproductive. He urges Democrats to acknowledge real problems, oppose poor solutions with better ones, and avoid falling into the trap of simply negating whatever Trump supports. The key to political success in Cuomo’s eyes: Connect with the mainstream’s real concerns and offer pragmatic, superior remedies—not just louder outrage.
Tone: Candid, impatient, at times profane, always focused on solutions over tribalism.
Overall Message: If you want to win (midterms, policy, public trust), fight over better solutions—don’t pretend the problems don’t exist just because your political opponent points them out.
Sign-off: "Be a critical thinker. Be a free agent. That’s enough. Let’s get after it." (end)