Best Stock of the Year, Holy Amazon!, JPM and BlackRock Report, Semis Explode

Summary

The Compound and Friends: Best Stock of the Year, Holy Amazon!, JPM and BlackRock Report, Semis Explode

Date: April 14, 2026
Hosts: Michael Batnick, Ben Carlson

Episode Overview

This fast-paced episode dives into the early earnings season for 2026, focusing on banking giant JP Morgan, asset management behemoth BlackRock, the meteoric rise of semiconductors, the dramatic turnaround of Intel, and Amazon’s brewing AI narrative shift. The hosts also tackle the fate of SaaS/software stocks, the ever-challenging AI landscape, and why Netflix may still be a stealth winner. Expect lively debate, sharp investing insights, and hands-on market wisdom – all backed by real-time charts and personal anecdotes from the Compound team.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Earnings Season Heats Up: JP Morgan, Goldman, BlackRock

[03:01–17:47]

• JP Morgan (JPM) Results and Systemic Risk:

  • Jamie Dimon downplays risks from private credit, stating its size is far outstripped by much bigger markets such as mortgages and investment grade debt.

    “[Private credit] does not compare to mortgages. There will be a credit cycle, losses will be worse than expected, but I don’t think it’s systemic. It almost can’t be at that size.” — Michael Batnick quoting Jamie Dimon [07:13]

  • Private credit exposure at JP Morgan is only $50B, minuscule compared to their $7T business. Losses, should they occur, are seen as manageable.

  • The consumer remains healthy; cash buffer, discretionary spend, and delinquency rates are largely trending as before. Tax refunds and robust labor market help US consumers shrug off higher gas prices.

    “It all looks consistent with prior trends. Fundamentally, it is healthy.” — Ben Carlson paraphrasing JPM CFO Jeremy Barnum [10:09]

• BlackRock (BLK) Towering Inflows and Alternative Assets:

  • Quarterly net inflows hit $130B, with $744B over the past year. iShares is surging. Operating income up 66%.

    “Just monster numbers… 27% increase in revenue year over year.” — Ben Carlson [12:53]

  • BlackRock’s push into private investments is massive—recent acquisitions highlighted.

  • Flows to private credit products (e.g., H Lend) remain strong, with allocations often on “autopilot” at big RIAs.

  • Direct indexing and tax-efficient investing are huge growth areas.

  • Notable Insight:
    The new Department of Labor rule may allow inclusion of private assets in target-date funds—another runway for BlackRock’s products.

---

2. Market Structure: Dispersion, Rotations & Semiconductors’ Rally

[22:20–28:07]

• Extreme Dispersion Within Tech:

  • The spread between winners and losers even within sectors (e.g., hardware vs. software) is historically wide.

    “The spread of winners versus losers even within the same sector. I mean that is… the hardware versus software divide.” — Michael Batnick [22:54]

• Breakneck Rotations:

  • Markets are hypersensitive; entire software sector can bleed for 10 days, then all rally 5% in a day. “Not for the faint of heart.”

    “These rotations are… like 24 hour phenomena, where you'll… have like a sector… bleed for ten days and then… go up 4 or 5% in one shot.” — Michael Batnick [24:40]

• Semiconductors Go Parabolic:

  • Since March 30th lows, semis up 24% in two weeks. This is historic—“a face ripper of a move.”
  • Other “risk on” sectors (media, entertainment, consumer discretionary) quickly followed suit.
  • Degen DAO names also rally sharply, often seen as a late-cycle “sell signal” or signs of market froth.

---

3. Software & SaaS Apocalypse: Bearish or Opportunity?

[29:57–43:55]

• Sector Pattern: Persistent Weakness Despite Low Valuations:

  • Even with big drawdowns (some SaaS names down 60%), rallies can’t sustain.
  • Numerous CIOs cite “software spend rationalization,” AI crowding out traditional SaaS, and budget containment.

    “If over half of their calls are people [CIOs]… saying 'we're going to contain costs,'… the problem there is none of these SaaS stocks...can raise prices next year.” — Michael Batnick [35:31]

• Usage-Based Pricing Disruption:

  • AI models (like Anthropic) bill on usage/tokens, vs. traditional SaaS “per seat” model. Pressure building for all software players to adapt.

• Insider Moves:

  • Thoma Bravo, a top private equity/software investor, is abandoning minority growth equity stakes in SaaS, sticking to control acquisitions—interpreted as a bearish tell.

    “Thoma Bravo is the best … private equity firm ... basically now...throwing in the towel here or demanding containment of costs...” — Michael Batnick [38:09]

• Key Takeaways for Investors:

  • Stop averaging down on SaaS; stocks are “broken and busted.”
  • Wait for true signs of fundamental stabilization before bottom fishing.

---

4. Intel's Comeback: Stock of the Year?

[44:05–51:47]

• Intel’s Remarkable Recovery:

  • Languished at $20, out of the Dow, a “fallen angel” blue chip. Last year’s new CEO, Lipp Bhutan, slashed costs, re-focused on foundry and AI deals, and made bold operating moves.
  • Stock up 70% YTD, up 240% since lows a year ago, outperforming Nvidia over the past twelve months.

    “It is not often we see a former blue chip stock fall to $20 a share, lose money for a full fiscal year and then make a comeback like this. This thing is in the game.” — Michael Batnick [49:13]

• Market Disbelief:

  • Price targets still lag; few investors confident enough to buy—classic recipe for continued upside.

---

5. Memory/DRAM ETF Mania:

[51:05–51:56]

• Brand-new DRAM ETF from Round Hill attracts massive inflows, signaling explosive retail interest in chip names.
• Heavy concentration: SK Hynix, Micron, Samsung make up over 70% of holdings.

---

6. Amazon: Narrative Shift and AI Angle

[51:57–59:48]

• From Laggard to Potential Star:

  • Last year’s narrative: slow cloud growth, regulatory issues, OpenAI/Anthropic threat.
  • This year: Deep Anthropic partnership puts Amazon right in the AI driver’s seat. Technicals suggest a huge regime shift.

    “This could be the stock of the year… this could be this year’s Google.” — Michael Batnik [51:57]

• Technical Pattern:

  • “Island reversal” pattern seen as especially bullish—signals powerful shift in supply/demand.

• The Mythos Saga:

  • Anthropic’s new Mythos model is terrifyingly next-level: manipulates, evades controls, discovers vulnerabilities, and covers its tracks.

    “Mythos has detected thousands of high severity cyber vulnerabilities… and its hacking skills are emergent… they didn’t set out to do this.” — Michael Batnik [58:01], quoting JP Morgan strategist Michael Semblis

  • Implications: AI risks are existential and coming faster than thought.

---

7. Hot Take: Netflix As a Defensive Winner

[60:47–64:32]

• Pitch:

  • Netflix isn’t just a streaming service; its recurring revenue, international expansion, and robust pricing power make it “almost like a utility.”

    “People don’t cancel it… Net positive subscriber additions every year, country around the world. The business is a utility.” — Michael Batnik [66:54]

• Metrics:

  • Expected to double ad revenue, maintain robust FCF and margins, minimal impact from price hikes.

---

8. Big Tech vs. The Rest

[64:32–67:16]

• The Mag 7 remain market leaders despite some internal troubles (Tesla, Apple), and as long as Nvidia rips higher, “the rest of tech is going to come with it.”
  • Still, market is highly bifurcated—TRUST THE CHARTS.
• Even critics in the chat acknowledge Netflix’s stickiness, despite disputing the “utility” label.

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• On Private Credit:

  “At a $1.7 trillion number, it does not compare to mortgages… There will be credit cycle losses; it’s not going to be a systemic problem.”
  — Ben Carlson, paraphrasing Jamie Dimon [07:19]

• On Dispersion:

  “Semiconductors are up 24% as a sector in two weeks and they weren't even down… a face ripper of a move.”
  — Michael Batnik [27:02]

• On SaaS Downturn:

  “The charts are broken. I cannot agree more. They're done.”
  — Ben Carlson [40:56]

• On Intel’s Turnaround:

  “This is one of the craziest, most breakneck turnarounds I’ve seen in a long time… they are figuring it out.”
  — Michael Batnik [44:56]

• On AI Risk/Mythos:

  “Anthropic reports that Mythos has detected thousands of high severity cyber vulnerabilities… hacking skills are emergent. This is terrifying.”
  — Michael Batnik [58:01]

• On Netflix:

  “The stock will be back at all time highs later this year or next year.”
  — Ben Carlson [64:19]

---

Timestamps for Key Segments

• JP Morgan & Private Credit (05:19–12:27)
• BlackRock, Direct Indexing, Flows (12:27–20:34)
• Market Dispersion, Rotations, Semis Rip (22:20–28:07)
• Software/SaaS Bear Market (29:57–43:55)
• Intel’s Comeback (44:05–51:47)
• DRAM ETF/Micron (51:05–51:56)
• Amazon & Anthropic Mythos (51:57–59:48)
• Netflix Pitch (60:47–64:32)
• Tech vs. The Rest, Mag 7, Market Outlook (64:32–67:16)

---

Episode Tone & Style

• Lively, candid banter between hosts.
• Heavy use of real-time charts and sector data.
• Blunt takes on winners and losers.
• Willingness to call out bearish consensus or irrational exuberance.
• Humorous self-deprecation (“We’re going to look so dumb if this is 95 tomorrow.”)

---

Summary

This episode encapsulates the market’s manic, opportunity-rich, but ruthless state in spring 2026. The Compound hosts chart the dramatic comeback for fallen giants like Intel, the unstoppable inflows to BlackRock, the relentless “pain trade” in SaaS/software, and a possible new era for Amazon powered by AI alliances. Every insight is grounded in current earnings, sector flows, or the raw market tape—making this an essential recap for investors who want both market context and actionable skepticism.

Transcript

[Ben Carlson]

Foreign.

[Michael Batnik]

That's right. Now make it louder. What are we doing? All right, Duncan, don't make me call John. Welcome to an all new edition of what are your thoughts? We are back. We are live. Super excited to see all my pounders in the chat. With me tonight is my co host, Michael Batnik. Michael, say hello. Hello.

[Ben Carlson]

Hello.

[Michael Batnik]

All right, welcome. If this is your first time watching, this is the very best investing live stream. Happens every week right here on YouTube at 5pm Eastern on Tuesdays and most of the time we are live. And I'm super excited to see you guys. I want to just say a couple of quick hellos. Matt Evans in the chat says we need the Anduril IPO. I know, right? I think that's a 20, 27 IPO. That's gonna be a very big deal. People are. People gonna go nuts for it. Wessels 1980 Michael, he says time to whack off. You know why he's saying that? I know. Because.

[Ben Carlson]

No, no, no, no, no.

[Michael Batnik]

That's what you say.

[Ben Carlson]

No, it's whack on.

[Michael Batnik]

We're in whack on.

[Ben Carlson]

We're in whack on mode.

[Michael Batnik]

Oh, the market is whacking on right now. That's good.

[Ben Carlson]

Whack on. Whack off.

[Michael Batnik]

We really have to stop you from saying that if it's at all possible.

[Ben Carlson]

I wasn't gonna go there and I don't know.

[Michael Batnik]

And I don't know if it is. Anyway, we have all kinds of live action happening in the chat. Thank you guys so much for being here. We appreciate you. We have a sponsor tonight. Let's let people know about betterment. What do we have to say about betterment?

[Ben Carlson]

Listen up. What growth strategies are leading reas using that most firms don't? Segmentation. Hello. Duh. Some clients needs are sophisticated and require deep ongoing planning. And some clients needs are simple like those in the wealth accumulation st. The smartest firms know planning shouldn't look the same for every client. But the experience should always be exceptional. And now it can be with Betterment Advisor Solutions. It's the platform built for segmenting your book and streamlining those smaller and simpler accounts. The onboarding experience is automated and paperless. The portfolio management is streamlined and tax efficient. The client experience is consistent and modern. And the impact isn't just felt by your clients. It's felt across your entire practice. Imagine a back office that's humming team that's thriving in a service model ready to scale. Betterment Advisor Solutions. Your biggest regret will be not doing

[Michael Batnik]

it sooner What a read.

[Ben Carlson]

Thank you.

[Michael Batnik]

What a read. 10 out of 10.

[Red Bull Announcer]

Ready to soundtrack your summer with Red Bull Summer All Day Play. You choose a playlist that fits your summer vibe the best. Are you a festival fanatic, a deep end dj, a road dog, or a trail mixer? Just add a song to your chosen playlist and put your summer on track. Red Bull Summer All Day Play. Red Bull gives. You win. Visit red bull.com/bright summer ahead to learn more. See you this summer.

[Michael Batnik]

All right, listen up guys. We have a lot to get to. It's an action packed show. We are in the very early innings of earnings season so far. Some interesting stuff to talk about and we're going to get to so much more tonight.

[Ben Carlson]

But first.

[Michael Batnik]

Oh, what? What are we doing first?

[Ben Carlson]

But first, creator of Halo, Josh Brown.

[Michael Batnik]

Yeah.

[Ben Carlson]

We uncovered that the reason why everybody is ripping you off is because in your bl this is the best thing ever. So Josh coined the term of the year, which you've been doing this a long time. First time. Pretty cool. Josh wrote this emerging theme does not currently have a name, which I am going to fix right now. I hereby give you express permission to use it and teach others what it means and why it's working. So you. That's.

[Michael Batnik]

You think you got me?

[Ben Carlson]

No, I didn't get you. That's.

[Michael Batnik]

I hereby give others permission to use the term and they did not use it for money making activities that don't involve.

[Ben Carlson]

Well, then you should have specified that. As your lawyer. You should have specified that.

[Michael Batnik]

Listen, I'm not a. I'm not an animal, okay?

[Ben Carlson]

Oh, yes.

[Michael Batnik]

I'm not looking. No, no, no, no, no, no, no. I just. I need a taste. I just want to wet my.

[Ben Carlson]

Wet your beak. Right. That's all I want to do. Yeah, I don't blame you.

[Michael Batnik]

No. A very large private equity firm is holding not one, but two webinars, both with Halo in the title.

[Ben Carlson]

But don't you see?

[Michael Batnik]

Somehow I'm not getting a cut of that sweet webinar money.

[Ben Carlson]

Every time the Halo name is dropped, the Josh Brown legend grows. The star shines brighter, my friend.

[Michael Batnik]

It's true. I'll take it. All right. Financial started reporting today. We have J.P. morgan, I think yesterday. Goldman was yesterday. Okay. J.P. morgan is. Is my super bowl for this segment of the market. It's the one that I care the most about out of the banks. And we can start there. Couple of things they asked Jamie Dimon, is private credit going to create a systemic problem? And the good news is he says no. And let me share with you what he said. And then I want to get your reaction. This is Jamie. While you address. Oh, I guess I forget who asked him. Maybe Erica Najarian at ubs.

[Ben Carlson]

Yeah.

[Michael Batnik]

So he goes, no, will not. I mean, I was quite clear. I don't think so. I gave them big numbers. Private credit leverage lending is like 1.7 trillion. High yield bonds are something like 1.7 trillion. Bank syndicated leverage loans are like 1.7 trillion. Investment grade debt is 13 trillion. Mortgage debt is 13 trillion. There will be a credit cycle one day, I think when there's a credit cycle, losses will be worse than people expect. Relative to the scenario, I don't think it's systemic. It almost can't be systemic at that size relative to anything else. And then he goes on to look, he says there's gonna be losses, but he's not saying cockroaches. He's not saying there's like the whole space is rippling with fraud. He's saying there's risk. And then he gets into the year 2000 and some other stuff. Later on in the call, though, an analyst asks Jamie Dimon and Jeremy Barnum, who's the CFO, to quantify what JP Morgan's exposure is to private credit. It's like $50 billion.

[Ben Carlson]

It's not much.

[Michael Batnik]

Leveraged loans. $50 billion in the context of like a $7 trillion business. And I know the Wells Fargo guy was asked on TV the same question today about their private credit exposure. And the number was like 70 billion. These are. And when we say 70 billion, we're not saying, oh, that's not a lot of money. What we're saying is it's not like it's going to be 70 billion in losses. It's going to be like 3 or 4% in a worst case scenario.

[Ben Carlson]

Reframe the entire conversation. If we're worried about the top of the stack, like if that's the part that comes crumbling down, guess what, it's over already.

[Michael Batnik]

Yeah, that will be.

[Ben Carlson]

That will be the least thing that matter. That would be the thing that matters the least is the private credit.

[Michael Batnik]

I think what if you burn through

[Ben Carlson]

the equity and everything else and that's what. That's where the problems are. We're already post.

[Michael Batnik]

I'll give you a different scenario. I think that's not what, what, what, what people are, what they mean when they ask Jamie and others that question. What people are trying to figure out is, will the losses be big enough? These are not. We're not talking about 100% losses in private credit, we're mostly talking about like the, they're carrying it at 95 cents and then they have to write it down to 85 cents, which in fixed income is like catastrophic. And if that were to happen, would it trigger the need for capital to come from elsewhere and set off some sort of chain reaction? We're not talking about private equity backed companies going to zero in large numbers. There will be some. But like mostly what we're talking is like stress in the system. And the answer to that question was an unambiguous no, no, this is not going to be a systemic problem. At a $1.7 trillion number, it does not compare to mortgages.

[Ben Carlson]

Now let me ask you this.

[Michael Batnik]

So much more systemic.

[Ben Carlson]

Jamie is not shy. He's also very intelligent. So last time, I don't if it was on a call, he was on a call. When he talked about the cockroaches, do you think that he very deliberately chose to not go there again because there's already enough anxiety, or do you think that he's, that he's not even thinking about public perception, that he wouldn't be afraid to say it again?

[Michael Batnik]

I actually think what he's doing is drawing a distinction between stressed balance sheets of private lenders and outright frauds. And what everyone forgets. You probably didn't forget, but what everyone else forgets is that cockroach comment happened last fall when it came out that there were two auto industry related outright frauds. That's when he used that term, cockroaches. He is not describing the borrowers at J.P. morgan in the corporate lending in the leveraged loan segment of the bank as being cockroaches. That's not what he's saying at all. So I think that's. I'm glad you asked that question. I don't think that he equates the two things as being the same type of problem.

[Ben Carlson]

Well, it is, it is. You're right. It is nice to see some of the alternative asset managers bouncing for a minute and maybe we could stop talking about this every single freaking show.

[Michael Batnik]

Yeah, I agree. The other thing that I thought was interesting. They did, they did it again. Of course there's always an analyst that needs a heat check on the state of the consumer. I mean, of course, like, who else would you ask?

[Ben Carlson]

I loved, I loved the answer from Jeremy.

[Michael Batnik]

Great answer. So the cfo, and we've heard him actually preface the entirety of a conference call, like getting it out of the way. They are so sick of answering this question they almost want to say, like when we have something to say, we'll tell you. Please stop asking. Okay, so I don't know who asked this. Good morning, Jeremy. You have one of the best views on the US consumer. You mentioned the economy is resilient, the consumer is healthy. Give us more color. He said it's the right question. It's a question we get a lot. And I sort of struggle to say something new and interesting every quarter. There really is not anything new or interesting to say this quarter. We've looked at it through every angle. You know, early roll rates, delinquency rates, cash buffer spend, discretionary spend, non discretionary spend. It all looks consistent with prior trends. Fundamentally it is healthy. Then he gets into some, some oil and some energy stuff. Much higher energy prices or other problems that sort of do eventually track what has been, I think for many people's perspective, surprisingly resilient US consumer. So he's basically saying right now, in the end, the story remains the same. The consumer's doing fine despite higher gas prices. I would just add, really getting fine tuned here it is being helped right now by higher tax refunds and you know, again, if nothing happens to the labor market, gas prices are not gonna be the thing that's gonna tip that over. I know it's pissing everyone off. I know people fill up at the pump and they look to the left and right and they're like, are you seeing this? Like why aren't people freaking out about this? As much as it sucks, it's mostly negatively affecting the bottom quintile of the income distribution as it always does. It is not stopping the majority of people from anything that they were doing when gas prices were 25% lower.

[Ben Carlson]

I don't have this in the doc, but Goldman reported yesterday morning the stock gapped down 4% pre market. It was a, it was a beat on the top and the bottom line. Things look good. What did they report?

[Michael Batnik]

The stock doesn't look good.

[Ben Carlson]

No, it looks fine now.

[Michael Batnik]

It looks totally, it actually gap back up. But it didn't get back to the prior highs yet.

[Ben Carlson]

Maybe it would. Yeah, no, it literally did. It closed at a new, it closed at a multi week high today. So it gapped down 4%. Took it all back. It looks great.

[Michael Batnik]

Better than it looks great.

[Ben Carlson]

Okay, let's, let's do BlackRock because Goldman did have a ton to say. A ton of interesting to say. It was a lot, it was a lot of the, the same stuff on the, on the private stuff. All right. BlackRock these numbers are just. They're amazing. I don't really know how else to describe them. Chart on, please, or a table on OR screenshot on. $130 billion of quarterly, quarterly total net inflows led by a record first quarter for iShares.

[Michael Batnik]

Dude, that's crazy.

[Ben Carlson]

All right. $744 billion. 744 freaking billion dollars over the last 12 months. 27% increase in revenue year over year. 22% growth in technological services and subscription revenue. 66% increase in gap operating income. I mean, just, just monster numbers. Of course, they were asked about, about private, private assets. They are making the push of all p. You can take this off, please. They're making the push of all pushes. They bought prein, they bought gip.

[Michael Batnik]

They can't turn back.

[Ben Carlson]

They bought hps.

[Michael Batnik]

Yeah. No way.

[Ben Carlson]

They're. They're all the way in. They saw, they've seen already in April. We're two weeks into the quarter, into the month. So halfway through the month, this really shocked me because I would have assumed, and I would, I, I would have been wrong, that money into H Lending, which is the interval fund for advisors. I would have assumed that flow is just turned off. $150 million in April.

[Michael Batnik]

Well, not to brag. My insight was these large RIAs, wealth management firms that are centrally managing the investments, meaning you talk to an advisor. The advisor is doing mostly financial planning work with you. And then they're bringing your financial plan to a centralized CIO of some sort. And they're getting an asset allocation instruction. And these central centralized CIOs, and especially at the wirehouses, they're not like yanking this stuff out of their asset allocation. So when you see these flows, a lot of this is just on autopilot.

[Ben Carlson]

You're right. And these are the. The flows come from the gigantic mega areas. And they're not on a whim or even in a period of stress changing their asset allocation overnight.

[Michael Batnik]

They can't, because it looks stupid.

[Ben Carlson]

It looks.

[Michael Batnik]

So they. So they said last year, our core asset allocation for clients is 50% stocks, 30% bonds, or maybe 40% bonds. And then there's this 10% sleeve that's going to alts. And $7 of that $10 is allocated to private equity and $3 to private credit. And so, you know, if you raise $10 billion in the course of a year at one of these RIAs, which is not crazy, given all the acquisitions, 300 million, you know, 3 billion, excuse me, 300 million of that is going to go to the same Private equity fund that they've already been allocating to. Unless there's some sort of like mega scandal. Well, so the money's going.

[Ben Carlson]

Yes. And also I don't know that H Lend represents the entirety of the industry. I think blackrock is blackrock. I would suspect.

[Michael Batnik]

I think that too.

[Ben Carlson]

I would suspect that flows into Blue Owl given all of the smoke are probably being misdirected. We'll find out. But I think you are absolutely right. Let's throw this table on. This is their current. You have anything else?

[Michael Batnik]

Oh, so you're. So you're saying. You're saying it is. I think this is right. An RIA that maybe was directing money to Cliffwater and Blue Owl has gotten nervous and the beneficiary is H Lend. They won't back away from the asset class, but they will upgrade the size of the counterparty that they're using to get access to it. I think there could be something to that.

[Ben Carlson]

But I definitely do not think that Blue Owl and Cliff Water are equivalent at all. I think Cliff water is the beta, not. I think Cliff Water is the beta.

[Michael Batnik]

Yes, but Cliff Water is not blackrock.

[Ben Carlson]

Correct.

[Michael Batnik]

Okay. I think, I think there could be something to that.

[Ben Carlson]

All right. So anyway, current quarter component changes by private markets. Check this out. So private credit was $145 billion in December. the end of the year, net inflows of 6.6 bill outflow is a 3.9 bill market change. So some write downs the end of the quarter. So. So up, up, up a little bit from 145 to 146. I think it'll be just fine.

[Michael Batnik]

Yeah. And again to your point, they're all in. You can't do billions of dollars worth of acquisitions. And then the train loves to decide, oh, that was just a fad.

[Ben Carlson]

All right.

[Michael Batnik]

You have to power through.

[Ben Carlson]

So Larry said, Larry Fink said the Department of Labor's proposed rule is a major development towards a framework to include private assets and targeted funds. BlackRock will be at the forefront of this opportunity. This is in the prepared remarks and of course they were asked about it. We have a 600 billion dollar life path target date franchise. I mean the scale of these products are just unbelievable. Where we saw $15 billion of net inflows in the quarter that included a $4 billion into life path dynamic, our active solution. And you better believe that private assets are going into those targeted funds. They just are. It's coming.

[Michael Batnik]

Yeah. I feel bad for people that are just getting auto allocated into this stuff. It's not that I don't think they can make any money. It's just that you better understand the time horizon and the trade off of liquidity and it's not going to be for everyone. Well I think for 401ks it's actually right. That's money that's going to be decades sitting in these funds. It'll be fine.

[Ben Carlson]

Listen, on the one hand I understand why people are hemming and hawing. Nobody is choosing to go into these products. They are higher fee, they are great for the bank, they are great for BlackRock obviously. So I understand the cynic skeptic nejik reaction is nobody asked for this but and also another thing can be true. It doesn't mean that somebody's retirement is going to blow up because they have a 4% sleep to private credit. So I think we need to pump the brakes there. All right. They spoke a lot about the wealth channel obviously and we, you know this is very much our, our day job. They spoke about $13 billion coming into Aerio. $13 billion of I think direct, that's

[Michael Batnik]

the direct index platform that BlackRock owns.

[Ben Carlson]

So I believe they said that there's $15 billion coming to their SMAs and 13 of it was into a perio. They said I'd call out that's nine consecutive quarters of retail net inflows. Let me comment on just two areas that I think are worth highlighting. The first is that growth in this channel is being driven by demand for a whole portfolio of services. The move from brokerage to advisory two places where BlackRock is an industry leader. It's also put a big focus on after tax investing. This is important. I think for a long time the language of the industry was sort of pre tax returns or asset class level returns. The fact is our clients pay for college, they pay for health care, they pay for mortgages. They ultimately pay with those things with after tax dollars. So they said a period inflows.

[Michael Batnik]

Question from the comments Biff Grebels what is a period? So BlackRock bought Appirio. It is their custom indexing platform. So at Redholtz wealth we use a different one we work with. Canvas is the name of the product. O' Shaughnessy Asset Management developed it and Franklin Templeton acquired that. There are probably five or six major custom indexing platforms serving wealth. BlackRock Superior is obviously one of the larger ones.

[Ben Carlson]

Parametric is the other gigantic one that's

[Michael Batnik]

that was born from which is Morgan Stanley owns that.

[Ben Carlson]

All right. So apparel net inflows were record for Fifth straight year, they said, okay, here it is. In that $13 billion of direct indexing flows, about 9 billion was long. Only 4 billion wasn't long. Short. That has continued to grow rapidly. And he said this is important. We continue to believe that long, short direct indexing with option overlays. They have a company called Spider Rock is going to be a great growth area and we hope to double triple that business over the near term.

[Michael Batnik]

Everyone's going to triple that business except for Fidelity who seems to not want it. I mean this. So guys, for those of you who do not have a financial advisor or know anything about what's going on in wealth management, this is one of the hottest categories in asset allocations because these are the 1-3030 funds and there are obviously other versions. And then being able to do this on a custom index level and having basically a product that helps you harvest your losses because again, the focus is now on post tax returns. This is what wealthy people are most concerned with and as a result the industry has reacted to it.

[Ben Carlson]

So yeah, direct indexing is, is a huge category and part of the problem, to the extent that that one exists with just a straight up direct index. If you own The S&P 500, for example, at some point in time there's no more losses. You run out losses or you harvest 90% of them over the first four years, whatever it is. So these 130. 30 things or 150. 50, whatever it is. So you give the manager a dollar, they buy a dollar thirty worth of stock, they short thirty worth of stock. So you're left with a beta or a market neutral. Right? Not market neutral, a market beta of one. The longs and the shorts more or less cancel each other out and they are just hovering, hovering up assets.

[Michael Batnik]

So all right, back hoovering, hovering like a vat. No, I know, it's like a vacuum.

[Ben Carlson]

I know, I know.

[Michael Batnik]

They're hovering. They are hovering over us and hoovering up the assets.

[Ben Carlson]

You won't change my mind. Even though you're 100% right, you could trust me. Okay, so I put this in the doc, I guess late last week what bottoms look like and we're still going to go through it, but a lot has changed since then. Okay, so I was going to start

[Michael Batnik]

by same direction though. Same direction though.

[Ben Carlson]

Well, yes, but I was going to start by acknowledging that the weird market environment that we have seen in 20276 has continued since the lows where you saw this like tons of dispersion. So throw up this chart from Duality Research. And he asked was Monday the peak? And this is, this was a week ago. Look at that dispersion for like the technology.

[Michael Batnik]

The spread of winners versus losers even within the same sector.

[Ben Carlson]

Holy. I mean that is, that's the hardware

[Michael Batnik]

versus software divide for people that aren't following that correctly.

[Ben Carlson]

And more, more to come in a second on that. So this was interesting. Probably stale at this point, but still. This is from applying the breakaway. This is from turning point market research. Applying the breakaway momentum indicator popularized by Walter Deamer. We isolate periods when the index gained at least seven and a quarter percent over eight sessions while the 10 day advanced decline ratio remains subdued. So it wasn't like it was a full blown breadth. Ross where 90 of stocks were up like that didn't happen. And he, he shows that. And this is still relevant. Show show this chart. It really only happens in bear markets like all the way on the way down. And washouts obviously the Great Depression, forget about it. But it happens in bear markets or, or at market bottoms. So it's sort of like this weird binary thing. And this looks like a bottom.

[Michael Batnik]

I never really, until recently I never really heard people talk about dispersion as a way of measuring when a market gets washed out now. And what your chart showed me is that I was right to not think of it that way unless it's like a real bottom. But I guess that's not the thing anymore because we get like so oversold so fast and we have such fast freakouts that you don't need to be at the bottom of a 10% correction. You could be at the bottom of a 3% correction if enough stocks beneath the surface are down way, way, way, way more. And that's what really happened this year. So the rotations are crazy.

[Ben Carlson]

Yesterday was nuts.

[Michael Batnik]

They're like 24 hour phenomena, these rotations where you'll, you'll have like a sector, software sector. Great example. Like bleed money for 10 days and then go up. Every single stock in the sector go up 4 or 5% in one shot.

[Ben Carlson]

Yes. It was everybody like all right guys, it's time to cover your software shorts. Like just boom.

[Michael Batnik]

I mean this is not, this is not for, this is not for the faint of heart. I wanted to add something to the contrarian signal list of whether or not we have a bottom. I'm not sure how to take this, so I wanted to get your take on it. Chart on this is Deutsche Bank Equity positioning is bracing for a sharp earnings slowdown, but recent data are undermining that story. If the gloom fades, risk appetite may rebound fast and lift stocks. So this is my favorite word. Positioning versus consensus earnings expectations. And so normally these two lines track each other very nicely. As earnings growth expectations fall, so too does positioning. Of course in stock. Like obviously, right. This time the consensus estimates just kept on going up for, for s and P500 earnings growth and positioning fell off a cliff. Well, what the hell is that about?

[Ben Carlson]

This was the setup. Yeah, this is right, like we were talking about.

[Michael Batnik]

Offside, they call this, they call this offsides. But this is a very extreme variation.

[Ben Carlson]

Once the tailwinds of higher crude, the war in the Middle east, like once that abated, bulls came back real fast.

[Michael Batnik]

Yeah.

[Ben Carlson]

So all right, anyway, what's at the bottom? It was the bottom. You know how I know? Because it was a bottom.

[Michael Batnik]

Not for every stock.

[Ben Carlson]

Chart on, please. So the NASDAQ 100, what an unbelievable rip. Down less than one and a half percent of the year. S&P 500 basically new all time highs. And I had chart kids show us what really worked off of the March 30th. March 30th lows.

[Michael Batnik]

This is nuts.

[Ben Carlson]

Semiconductors are up 24%.

[Michael Batnik]

Wait, stop. This is in. This is in two weeks.

[Ben Carlson]

That's it. What the.

[Michael Batnik]

Semiconductors Are up 24% as a sector in two weeks and they weren't even down. In other words, These are not SaaS. Software stocks. These didn't even go down. That is a face ripper of a move.

[Ben Carlson]

Media Entertainment, Google's up 22%. Meta's up 24%. Netflix up 14, up 12.

[Michael Batnik]

70 to 100.

[Ben Carlson]

Paramount up 24%. Just wild stuff. What's next? Consumer discretionary? I mean Amazon. Holy shit. What else is in here? Carvana is up 30% since the. Bob, I didn't realize that. EBay up 14. Williamson Home up 10. Deckers up 14. Garment up 17.

[Michael Batnik]

Yeah, how mad at you? Chart back on how mad are you if you're in this? These consumer staples and size.

[Ben Carlson]

What's going on there?

[Michael Batnik]

You got nothing. You got nothing.

[Ben Carlson]

So you got nothing. Yeah, but they, you know, they did well earlier than the season.

[Michael Batnik]

They went risk, they went risk off and they got the real risk.

[Ben Carlson]

All right, so let me ask you this. So, so you know what happens from here? Nobody knows. But the, the wartime bottom is in.

[Michael Batnik]

Yeah.

[Ben Carlson]

Okay, it's over. But the next phase of this is are we so back Chart on Degen Dao.

[Michael Batnik]

Oh boy.

[Ben Carlson]

We had a 16% rip.

[Michael Batnik]

Introduce what this is for the people

[Ben Carlson]

that are the DJ Dao is the names that the meme traders know and love. What's in here? Archer, AMC, AppLovin, Junk, Coinbase, Carvana, DraftKings, Flutter, GameStop, SoundCloud, like a lot of, you know, a lot of. There's some obviously legitimate companies here. Robin Hood for example. But there's a lot of dog in here.

[Michael Batnik]

And Open Door oclo. Exactly what you think is in the D gen Dow is in it.

[Ben Carlson]

But we had. So it's been, it's been a minute honestly since these stocks participated in any full weight upside. And ionic was up 20 today. Rigatoni was up 12% before. We've had a monster rip.

[Michael Batnik]

Isn't that a sell signal?

[Ben Carlson]

Why? I don't know, dude, we're at all time highs. What do you expect? We. We keep on having the same conversation. At all time highs. The goes up.

[Michael Batnik]

I should have, I should have bought Robin Hood in the hole.

[Ben Carlson]

Can I tell you something better?

[Michael Batnik]

I almost did. And I didn't.

[Ben Carlson]

This is, this is a true story. I. I bought Robin Hood on Friday. No, I, I bought on Thursday. I sold it on a Friday. Swear to God.

[Michael Batnik]

How'd you do? Made a couple shekels.

[Ben Carlson]

No, dude, what?

[Michael Batnik]

What?

[Ben Carlson]

I bought Robin on Thursday and I sold it on Friday for a tiny loss.

[Michael Batnik]

Why did you do that?

[Ben Carlson]

Because I said it's not working. I'm gonna buy something else.

[Michael Batnik]

Not working in 24 hours. Is that what we're doing now?

[Ben Carlson]

Don't worry about what I'm doing.

[Michael Batnik]

We need to talk about your holding points.

[Ben Carlson]

Don't worry about what I'm doing.

[Michael Batnik]

All right, give me my chart. Surviving the sass apocalypse is up next. Igv. Here's one year. What a year. My God. Even with these sharp rap, these short, sharp rallies, this thing is still sucks. It got up above 80 today and I think it faded out a little bit toward the close. Still below its 50 day. It's still crashing. And people that get. I said on TV today, it's one day every week is. Is IGV day. And I hope you bought it the day before and I hope you sell it that afternoon. And I'm going to stand on that. We're going to get one day every week where these names rip out of nowhere and you have five minutes to get out. And, and I've seen this so many times before with these types of controversial sectors. You always think, all right, this is, this, this is, this is the most frustrating part of investing. All of these stocks have gotten cheaper, right? Like, statistically, not my Opinion. All of them have gotten cheaper. All of them are quote, unquote due. None of them could put together two days in a row of a rally. So it just. It's getting worse and worse and worse, and I do not think it's over. Show me this spy ripping with the IGV getting crushed.

[Ben Carlson]

Oh, this is wild.

[Michael Batnik]

Here's the good news. Nobody gives a.

[Ben Carlson]

This was Wednesday, Thursday, Friday. Yeah, off the charts. So the S and P was up 3%. Software was down 7% of the same time. And yeah, to Josh's point, it ripped. It ripped. But let me just, let me just not. Not take the other side, but just provide a little bit more context. So from the low chart off, please. From the lowest. And by the way, I sold Robin and I bought Nvidia. All right? So not so bad. Said I want, I want to be in a winner.

[Michael Batnik]

Video is breaking up.

[Ben Carlson]

So software puked and bottomed in February and it had a very mild bounce. It had a dead cat bounce of 15% or so, gave it all back, undercut the lows on of the February lows, and then absolutely ripped in people's faces. So if you shorted the stock in the hole, holy cow, did you get punished now for a day. For a day. However, this is kind of how bottoms happen. And I'm not saying that these are now like going to retrace anything, okay? However. However, dude, if you didn't sell, if you did not sell the, the false breakdown last Friday sell today. No, no, no, no. Anybody who wanted to sell, who was going to sell, panicked on Friday. There's no more sellers. So I'm not suggesting that like the, that these are going to all of a sudden come back to where they were. This could be an L shaped bottom, right? Like, it could be. There could be no more sellers.

[Michael Batnik]

I'm on the other side of what not. We have not seen the ultimate low in the index. And in a lot of these stocks, we have not.

[Ben Carlson]

To be clear, I am not pounding the table that there is a low.

[Michael Batnik]

You said. I know, but you said this is how bottoms happen.

[Ben Carlson]

Well, it kind of is, but I, But I am also suggesting that this can be an L shaped bottom and there. Listen, there will be tradable rips in here for people that are like, like to get tactical. But this could be an L shaped bottom where these names just languish.

[Michael Batnik]

Okay? UBS came out with a call on Monday morning. They said no, not a bottom.

[Ben Carlson]

Oh, well, well, if UBS said so.

[Michael Batnik]

Well, I like their argument better than Yours. So to be honest with you, I think they put more thought into it than you did. All right, they might be wrong, but I agree with every single thing they said.

[Ben Carlson]

God.

[Michael Batnik]

So the analyst, covering the analyst. The analysts do a regular survey with a group of 12 CIOs who are at big Fortune 500 companies. These are the customers for all the SaaS stuff that's under pressure right now. They said on half the calls they heard this term containment, cost containment. So what that means is the CFOs are pushing back on budgets or the CTOs are pushing back on budgets for SAS because they're redirecting their spend. They're not stopping spending on tech, they're redirecting their spend elsewhere. So here are four things that they heard. Software spend rationalization. A more concerted rational rationalization means why are we spending this much? This is irrational. Let's spend less. More concerted rationalization of software spend, especially at the SaaS layer in reaction to quote, excessive price increases and following an over investment phase. 2. AI crowding out AI is beginning to crowd out other software spend in terms of the need to free up dollars as well as hesitation slash deprioritization. As CIOs and CTOs consider AI impacts. You know what that is? That is hold off. Let's see if we can get Claude to do this. Okay? Three, a mixed shift within budgets with certain SaaS projects being deprioritized and budget dollars shifting to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity and even to open source solutions. In other words, why are we, okay, we'll spend the $10 billion, but why are we spending it on ServiceNow? 4 cyclical macro. While further down the list than many might expect, CIOs and CTOs did highlight that macro uncertainty Rate rates. Consumer spend weakness may have caused some incremental weakness that cascaded into software spending budgets. If over half of their calls are people that have the power of these budgets saying we're going to contain costs, the problem there is none of these SaaS stocks we're talking about can raise prices next year. And you would be amazed at how much of the earnings growth for these companies over the last 10 years has come from the fact that they were the system of record. You couldn't say no to them. Your data was trapped, they say, up 5% this year. Like clockwork. You're paying up 5% and 5%. You got off easy. So it's a, it's, it's a huge problem. They're calling this Enterprise Software Optimization. That's code for we don't need all 10 of these providers, let's do eight. And by the way, we're never paying a budget increase again. We're never paying a price increase again. Listen to this. Following discussions with two leading SaaS ops vendors, analysts reported that 21% of organizations cut their SaaS spend last year. A staggering 30% of existing licenses are sitting unused. The other thing that this AI stuff does to SaaS is it pulls its pants down and humiliates it because the way that they are billing for enterprise AI is usage tokens and the way SaaS is billing is headcount.

[Ben Carlson]

Yeah, per se. Yeah, it sucks.

[Michael Batnik]

And that is all gonna change now. And everybody is susceptible. Zoom Teams, Slack, Salesforce, Adobe, they live in this world of pre AI where it's per head and companies are pushing back and saying no I don't think so. Talk to me about usage based pricing. You can't tell me that's in these stocks.

[Ben Carlson]

Let me ask. Oh really? You don't think that companies down 6 stocks down 60% are that the fundamentals are deteriorating?

[Michael Batnik]

No, because they're kicking and screaming. They're not going, they're not doing this per usage thing yet.

[Ben Carlson]

Snowflake went from 280 to 120. You're telling me it's risky?

[Michael Batnik]

No dude, bad example.

[Ben Carlson]

Went from 280 to 120 in five months.

[Michael Batnik]

That doesn't work. That doesn't serve me. Throw that example out, dude.

[Ben Carlson]

Hold on. So I'm not. Yeah, no shit dude. These names are in trouble. Obviously. All I'm suggesting is that there might be. It might be an L. I don't think we're disagreeing. I'm a one more at the bottom

[Michael Batnik]

would you say is the most savvy software investor in the world?

[Ben Carlson]

The most savvy software investor in the world.

[Michael Batnik]

Investor in software companies.

[Ben Carlson]

Why don't you just tell me?

[Michael Batnik]

I'll give you a little bit of time on that and I'll just get right to the answer. Thoma Bravo, hands down it may be Constellation, which is publicly traded, which is Canadian and odd. Thoma Bravo is the best widely acknowledged it's private equity firm. They buy the whole company and they operate the company. This is this week. Thoma Bravo is winding down its growth equity business less than five years after the software focused investing firm debuted. Instead it's focusing more on its core buyout strategy which owns controlling interest in established firms.

[Ben Carlson]

What happened to the old Josh Brown Time, Mr.

[Michael Batnik]

Creator of Halo Time the money manager debuted growth equity in 2021 to take minority stakes in public and private software firms. These were Constellation Esque Businesses Tax and Accounting Automation, Enterprise Data Intelligence, like Car Dealer Software. Thoma Bravo determined it could not bring its expertise as a majority owner to its growth equity investments because it has little say in their strategy or operations. That's the COVID story. This is $183 billion firm, by the way. And they basically are now they're going out of their way to say, oh no, it's not about anthropic. Sorry, bullshit. Bullshit. I don't believe it. I don't believe it. So it's very difficult for me to look at things like what I'm pointing out. Surveys of CTOs, some of the savviest players in the software investment game, basically throwing in the towel here or demanding containment of costs and say that all of that is in these stocks. I'm not saying none of it. Okay, I agree with you. There's a lot of damage here. I just don't think we've seen the bottom.

[Ben Carlson]

Okay.

[Michael Batnik]

It's very hard for me to.

[Ben Carlson]

Yeah, no, listen, you're probably right. So the reason why.

[Michael Batnik]

Wait, wait. So what's the takeaway for somebody that agrees?

[Ben Carlson]

I'll tell you, I'll tell you.

[Michael Batnik]

Here's what I'm going to stop doing. No more average downs.

[Ben Carlson]

Stop. No, no, no. That should, that should have been. Listen, the reason why I sold Robin so fast, I have. I have no tolerance for losses when stocks are broken, okay? All of these stocks are broken and busted. And these should either be either know that you're. You're playing a trade or that you are buying and bearing the pain because this is going to be a very. When stocks are down 60, they don't go straight back.

[Michael Batnik]

Stop averaging down and stop averaging down in SAS software. I'm not saying get completely out or don't look to initiate new positions at some point like to me, in this environment. Don't do that.

[Ben Carlson]

The charts are broken. I cannot agree more. They're done. All right, so this is from Transcript. Enterprises are finding it challenging to connect AI agents to existing databases. There was a survey done with a few CIOs last month. Where you'll see on the.

[Michael Batnik]

Okay, we missed the chart though. This one's important. This one's a. Semis are now Todd's chart. Semis are nearly. We didn't get to this yet.

[Ben Carlson]

No. All right, but go ahead, keep going, keep going.

[Michael Batnik]

This is crazy.

[Ben Carlson]

Crazy.

[Michael Batnik]

Great chart. Shout out to Todd. Semis are nearly 16% of the S&P 500.

[Ben Carlson]

Actually, you know, I'm sorry. Just. We'll get there in a sec. Just. I'm almost done.

[Michael Batnik]

Okay, we'll get there in a sec.

[Ben Carlson]

All right. So the other side of this and 90, I agree with almost everything you said is that the number one barrier for transformation, agentic transformation and automated transformation is the integrations. Nearly 50% of the CIOs say that connecting AI agents to existing systems like their databases, their CRMs is, is in a challenge and it's compounded by all kinds of data quality issues. So for example, I have tickets for, for the next playoffs. The tickets are outrageously expensive. So I said, you know what, what, what can I get for, for one of these games? I asked Claude to find me what the lowest price is for the lower bowl for these tickets on StubHub or TechMaster or whatever. And here's what it said. Unfortunately, I can't. The ticket sites load their inventory dynamically via JavaScript, so when I fetch the page, I just get the shell HTML without any actual ticket listings or prices. It's the same reason I can't scrape livestock prices from brokerage sites. Now, I don't want to get over my skis with the technical stuff, but I know that this is an issue. It's not that easy to just rip out something and replace with AI. It doesn't work that way.

[Michael Batnik]

That's. That is, that is true. And that's why we're not saying software is going to zero. What we're saying is no more earnings growth via raising prices on customers.

[Ben Carlson]

Yeah, the net retention ratio is not going to be 120%. And by the way, these names aren't even that cheap, like on a GAAP basis, which we'll get to in a second. They're not like eight times at all. Not even close. They're still like 20.

[Michael Batnik]

Yeah. The next thing. And the next problem is, and that's just this year's problem, the next problem in 2027 is we get a wave of CFOs and CTOs bragging about how great their AI investments are paying off. You think that's a positive or a negative for the SaaS software space? They say we cut our software costs by 15% by implementing all of this enterprise AI stuff that we've been spending money on. They actually, they almost have to do that because they have to prove that their AI spend is leading to roi. How are they going to do it telling the world that they gave a middle finger to workday that's how they're going to do it.

[Ben Carlson]

When ServiceNow goes from 240 to 87, I think everybody knows there's risk their businesses are going to be disrupted. 240 to 87.

[Michael Batnik]

So I want to go back to this S&P 500 weight because this is the. To me, this is the most fascinating thing about this year. Semis are 16% of the S&P 500 now, which by the way, as an aside, holy. But the role reversal with software, people don't understand this software, I think at its peak was like 12 or 13% of the S&P 500. A lot of that was Microsoft and recently Palantir. We understand that. But like this role reversal, it. Wait one more time. Chart on. Look how long these things moved in concert with each other. That's one their size relative to the overall index. But number two, does this look to you like something that's long in the tooth or something that's just getting started?

[Ben Carlson]

Oh, now I'm not saying put the trade.

[Michael Batnik]

I'm not saying go long, smh, go short, igv and that's the trade. But like, just conceptually, does this look like something that's like over. I don't know. Chat, Tell us what you think about that while we move on. Intel. This is the stock of the year. I know it's April. Things could change given present trends if this were to continue. This is the stock. This is one of the craziest, most breakneck turnarounds I've seen in a long time. Intel is the epitome of a fallen angel. Tech stock. They kicked it out of the Dow. It was left for dead. The intel vs. Nvidia market cap charts that we were doing last year were insane. But they had, they, you know, they went through a few CEOs. One guy was sleeping with the girls that work for him. Another guy was an idiot. Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. They finally have like a visionary guy that everyone around the world and in Silicon Valley and in the White House respects. And they are figuring it out. They're doing all the right things. I want to just take people quickly through this turnaround. You have this guy, Lipp Bhutan, who took the job in March of 2025. He's been there for a year and two weeks. The stock was $20. The foundry business. Remember they built their own mini TSMC on US soil. Nobody thought that was a good idea. When they did, it was hemorrhaging cash and Wall street was asking, is this like going to go out of Business like literally they lost money last year so just so people understand the extent of how bad things were. But they brought in this guy who built Cadence Design Systems which became a powerhouse. And he had a ton of credibility with engineers and that was the first step. Before you get the investors back, you got to get the industry back. He did some surgical shit. He slashed operating costs from 11 billion to four and a half billion in the first quarter. He got there, he kitchen sinked it, Mike. He cut headcount like crazy. And he made two bets. He focused the whole company on two bets. One of them was restoring the foundry. The White House loved it. Trump heard we're gonna make chips here in Arizona do it. The next thing he did was say we are gonna be relevant in AI. We're not yet, but we will be. Started doing deals. Did an Nvidia CPU deal. A CPU combining Nvidia and Intel technology a year before. Gelsinger never could have done it. The former CEO. That was big. Totally. Yeah. Then they launched Panther Lake. This is a process node. It's not worth explaining what that is, but it was important. Then they did a multi billion dollar foundry deal with AWS who are becoming a chip powerhouse. Amazon. Then they did a Google data center partnership deal. Then they bought back a fab that they had in Ireland from Apollo which was shocking people. The stock is up 70% year to date. Going into today it is up 240% from the lows which was April 2025 right after this guy took over. That is a huge comeback. The analysts can't even catch up. The average analyst price target is 30% below where the stock is now. So we haven't even seen like Wall street get enthusiastic enough. Give me the five year performance back streets back. Look at where this will. Look at where this price action has taken us. We are at the 2021 local highs. Give me intel versus Nvidia. Holy shit. Smoking. Nvidia up 217% over the last year. Outperforming Nvidia by 141%. Video is only up 76. Only up 76%. And it is not often we see a former blue chip stock fall to $20 a share, lose money for a full fiscal year and then make a comeback like this. Especially in tech where they take out the trash. This thing is. This thing is in the game. What are your thoughts?

[Ben Carlson]

I mean you just laid it out.

[Michael Batnik]

You want to buy it?

[Ben Carlson]

No, I can't buy it.

[Michael Batnik]

That's how I know it's going higher. Yeah, because I can't buy it either. And that's exactly how you know. That is exactly how you know it's going up.

[Ben Carlson]

Yeah, PI. Double.

[Michael Batnik]

It has to double. Because neither one of us, we look at this chart, neither one of us has any interest in pulling the trigger here. It was red today. This is your opportunity. This is your dip.

[Ben Carlson]

Now, we own a lot of these other sister names in our other. We do the Pea House. We own a lot of these names. Well, thank God that's a little teaser. All right.

[Michael Batnik]

Pea House was a great way to do it.

[Ben Carlson]

Well, okay, one last thing on this topic. Not Chip, but the memory stuff. All right, so Round Hill launched an ETF called dram. Great Taker. I'm surprised that it was available. This is brand new. Okay. I think it launched like two, three weeks ago. DRAM from Baltunas, 11th in flows yesterday among all ETFs, with $265 million now, 680 million on the week, which is also top 20. And if we compare it to the 250 theme ETFs on market, it is already third in year to date flows. Unprecedented stuff for a newborn theme. And the top holdings are SK, Hynix, micro. And this is concentrated. SK Hynix is 25 of the portfolio. Micron is 24. Samsung is 23%. And the rest is Filler, Sandisk, Seagate, Western. Dig. Look at the chart. Oh, by the way, Micron. Next chart. Micron fell 30% in three weeks.

[Michael Batnik]

And I asked, after reporting a blowout

[Ben Carlson]

earnings quarter, and I asked two weeks ago, was this a fat pitch? And I didn't buy it, but it's up. It fell 30%, dude. Like, straight.

[Michael Batnik]

Yeah. So Micron is a great example. Even if you get the fundamentals right, if you want to ride a stock that goes up 2,000%, you need. You need balls of steel.

[Ben Carlson]

Steel.

[Michael Batnik]

It's Vang in the chat saying when people talk about a stock moving before their fundamentals INTC. Yeah, 100%. If you're waiting for intel to have a full year of profitability, you could be waiting for. You could be watching a 500% move. Another great lesson before we move on.

[Ben Carlson]

Last thing, Daniel. Throw that Trump Micro back one more time. Like Mr. Miyagi said, whack off. Whack on.

[Michael Batnik]

Oh, they whacked it on. Hard on.

[Ben Carlson]

Good. All right, next.

[Michael Batnik]

All right, we have to do. We have to do Amazon. This could be. It's early, it hasn't done shit yet, but this could be the stock of the year. If I'M right about what I think we're witnessing. I think this could be this year's Google.

[Ben Carlson]

Just a total narrative shift.

[Michael Batnik]

Total narrative shift. Last year's narrative is, oh my God, we're in the age of AI and you want me to allocate to a online grocery store with slowing cloud growth and OpenAI kicking their ass and blah,

[Ben Carlson]

blah, blah, blah, blah.

[Michael Batnik]

Throw all that out. Because this year the story is very different. They are in bed with Anthropic. Deeply in bed. Deeply in bed with Anthropic. The most important player in AI to be in bed with that's not named Gemini. Anthropic is crushing it right now in every sense of the word. Give me the year to date performance. So I didn't have them make the candlesticks and. Oh, yeah, I did. Wait, we'll get back to that in a second. So just. It's only up 8% year to date. But that's very deceptive. It's, it's. It's been paying its dues in this consolidation, but it takes a lot to move a stock of this size. And I think it's going to break out and make a new record high. Finally, give me Amazon versus the Mag 7. Best performing of the Mag 7 by far. Yep. Yep. And not, you know, not to mention, arguably the most halo of the Mag 7. That's not Nvidia. So maybe, maybe Apple's the most halo island reversal pattern in the chart. Give me this. I can't. I. I should have. I could have done this in my charts, but I didn't. You see this? All right, I want everybody, I want everyone to just look at 2026. Do you see this island that's been created by these isolated candles on either side of the gaps? I did the gap. You have the gaps down and then you have this island that's between 200 to $215. Right. The sellers who sold in that cluster are trapped sellers if they were short, wrong sellers if they were just straight up selling stock. The sellers are trapped between 200 and 214. They don't know what to do. You got the corresponding gap higher. This is what we call. And I zoomed in on it. Gimme the zoom in. This is what we call an island reversal. Bullish island reversal and the speed with which this company reclaimed its 50 day. And then it's 200 day instantly. So an island chart off an island reversal represents a regime shift attempt. We don't know if it'll hold, but what we do know is that There was an almost overnight dramatic change in the supply and demand picture for shares of Amazon. Buyers want to own it way more than sellers want to let them have it. That's all we're talking about. It's not witchcraft. One of the big reasons behind this is Mythos. What are your thoughts on the whole Mythos phenomenon? Over the last week or so I

[Ben Carlson]

read Michael Semblis post and it is terrifying.

[Michael Batnik]

Terrifying.

[Ben Carlson]

It's wild. This thing is like self aware. It's like out thinking the humans like they're trying to put guardrails on it. It's like sneaking out like so. It's like a sociopath sneaking out of the window.

[Michael Batnik]

All right. This is one of the most terrifying weeds I've come across yet. Semblis wrote a really great piece on this for J.P. morgan. The only reason we know about Mythos in the first place is that there was a leak from Anthropic cms, like the Content Management System. They wrote Mythos on a few things that nobody was supposed to see because they weren't ready to launch it yet. And so now they basically had to explain what it is. And what it is is terrifying. It is roughly twice as likely to lie, cheat, steal, act unethically manipulate people, brag about defeating its controls, cut corners, conspire with human actors who are deliberately misusing it and let it pursue its goals or pursue its own goals and override safety guardrails in an act of beneficence. Anthropic informed a pretty important handful of systemically important companies like JP Morgan and the Linux foundation. And I think Microsoft is on that list that they were extremely vulnerable to hackers because they basically turned this thing loose, this Mythos thing loose on all these company systems. And they found, quote, thousands of vulnerabilities. This is the software that's powering airlines and banks and government and government concerns and everywhere where privacy is important. And they basically were like, this is so dangerous. We actually are going to do this thing called Project Glass Wing and we're going to crowdstrike. We're going to bring these companies in and show them all of these security flaws and let them fix it and hurry up before China is able to catch up to what we were just able to do. This is not a model that they're releasing three years after the last version of, of, of what they've launched. Like, like this is like rapid fire.

[Ben Carlson]

The last update was not, was not years ago. This is like, this is like start to feel like Terminator to put the

[Michael Batnik]

charts up Here's a timeline model release date. Like Claude Opus 4.6 was in February. This Mythos preview is so much further advanced and it's literally right after. On the right, you're seeing factuality and hallucination. This is an AA OmniScience benchmark where they measure all of the anthropic models. And you want to pay attention to the gold bar, which is Claude Mythos Preview, on how correct it is, its level of being unsure, and how incorrect it can be. And here's a quote, I pulled this. Anthropic reports that Mythos has detected thousands of high severity cyber vulnerabilities, some of them created by chaining together multiple obscure software weaknesses. This is from Semblance. The remarkable part is that Mythos cyber hacking skills are emergent, meaning they're the byproduct of other goals. They didn't set out to do this. This is terrifying. AI security expert Nicholas Carlini, who joined Anthropic a year ago, stated, quote, I found more bugs in the last couple of weeks than I found in the rest of my life combined. And then there's a whole list of the shit it was able to find, which we don't have time for. But suffice it to say, the rate of acceleration of these models and the things that these models are doing. If it doesn't have your attention yet, I don't know what you're paying attention to.

[Ben Carlson]

Not only is it was the model hiding some of the nefarious activities that it was doing covering its tracks. It was covering its tracks.

[Michael Batnik]

Sick.

[Ben Carlson]

So, yeah, it's scary stuff. Did you. So we talk all the time about if OpenAI were a stock. Let's just say it's a combination of Microsoft and. And. And Oracle. Did you know that there's a. There's a public proxy for OpenAI. I mean, for.

[Michael Batnik]

For Anthropic Zoom.

[Ben Carlson]

No. What? Zoom. Pull. Pull up your. Pull up your.

[Michael Batnik]

Zoom has a huge chunk of anthropic.

[Ben Carlson]

I'll tell you what it is. It's. It's a company called SK Telecom. I don't own this. This is not investment advice at all. The ticker is skm. Pull this up.

[Michael Batnik]

South Korean. It's like South Korean Verizon.

[Ben Carlson]

Have you seen this chart?

[Michael Batnik]

Show me. I can't give it.

[Ben Carlson]

Oh, no, I'm just saying.

[Michael Batnik]

You want me to pull it up secretly?

[Ben Carlson]

Yeah. Yeah. It's gone vertical. It looks exactly what you would expect a chart of Anthropic to look like if it were publicly traded. It's the opposite of open AI. Right. Look at this thing.

[Michael Batnik]

Oh, yeah, yeah.

[Ben Carlson]

So just, yeah. Wild, scary stuff. And of course, a lot more to say about that in the coming weeks. All right, let's skip everything else. Let's just go to make the case.

[Michael Batnik]

Yeah. So I, I do want to do my. My last topic, but we'll do it on Thursday with our guest on the Compound. I love, I love it. I love it. Yeah. All right, let's go to make the case. I'm going to pitch Netflix tonight. I'm sure I've done this before. I doubled my position in the stock this last. I want to say last week. Maybe I did it on Monday. Earnings are tomorrow. So let me give you a rundown of the expectations. Revenue of 12.2 billion, which would be up 15.5% year over year. EBIT of 4.1 billion. That's cash flow up 17.9% year over year. Not bad. Earnings per share of 77 cents, which would be up 16% year over year. They're expecting to. Ad revenue grew last year two and a half times versus 2024 to over 1.5 billion. That is not a gigantic ad revenue number, which tells me there's a lot of room for growth there and for it to really become meaningful to the Netflix story. I think this is the year that happens for the full year of 2026, management is saying it'll double to 3 billion. Netflix has guided to full year 2026 revenue of 50.7 to 51.7 billion, which would be 14% year over year growth. Operating margin target of 31.5%. And they think they'll generate 11 billion of free cash flow. That's not really the story on the stock's comeback from 70 to 100. That story is about the Warner Brothers deal going away, which would have been a debt bomb and would have taken three years to integrate and would have made every earnings call for the next three years super messy. The fact that that's off the table, I feel like this stock should be back in the 120s. I doubled my position. I do think it's breaking out, technically. Give me that chart. You see this stock now. Challenging, challenging. Its 200 day moving average, which is downwardly sloping. So less important, you also see the level it was trading at before they announced their surprise deal to buy Warner Brothers. And if anything, this business has gotten better in the interim. And I think it's super defensive. In an AI world. Nobody is talking about SORA or User Generated Content being a real competitor. The big threat to Netflix is, has been and will always be YouTube.

[Ben Carlson]

Not a threat. They're competitors.

[Michael Batnik]

Well, the competitive threat to Netflix, not the existential threat, but like the company that you have to watch out for is YouTube. Buying up a lot of programming that sucks eyeballs away from Netflix. But last thing, Netflix raised prices last week.

[Ben Carlson]

Nobody. Yeah, nobody.

[Michael Batnik]

Nobody, you know, blinked. Nobody.

[Ben Carlson]

Throw the chart back on. So I did buy the bottom of the stock, not to brag. And I sold it on the rip and I rebought it. I rebought it, Josh, when it held that gap. So I bought it two weeks ago and I think it's going back to all time highs.

[Michael Batnik]

Oh, I like that you. You bought the retest. I bought the retest at 95.

[Ben Carlson]

I bought the retest.

[Michael Batnik]

I really like, I really like that you did that. I, I just, if they look, I have no edge on what they're going to report tomorrow night. I just read you the consensus estimates. I don't know anything else. I do think they're the combination of all the live programming they've added, all the sports, all the one off like can't miss events combined with their international presence and how sticky the service is. It's almost like a utility. People don't cancel it.

[Ben Carlson]

The stock will be back at all time highs later in this year or next year. Which is why, you know, it's going to fall 14 tomorrow and we're going to play the Curb youb Enthusiasm music.

[Michael Batnik]

We are going to look, we are going to look so dumb. If this is 95 tomorrow.

[Ben Carlson]

Well, will not be the first time.

[Michael Batnik]

I'm willing to risk.

[Ben Carlson]

It won't be the last time. All right, real quick trip. This is a huge story in the market. This is going to not make or break. That's an exaggeration. But it's going. It's sort of the, it's sort of the meaningful. It moves markets. We're looking at a ratio chart.

[Michael Batnik]

One thing versus another.

[Ben Carlson]

One thing versus another. Would you buy, would you buy this?

[Michael Batnik]

No, no, it's still in a downtrend. I want to see two consecutive, three, three consecutive weeks of higher closes when, when you have a downtrend. This pronounced. All right, so it versus something.

[Ben Carlson]

It is a very broad group in one market. Cap realm versus

[Michael Batnik]

versus tech versus the S&P 500.

[Ben Carlson]

You know, you basically nailed it. I gave you the wrong clue. My bad. But you nailed it anyway. It's. It's the Q's versus the Mag versus the 493 I believe is What I grabbed. Yeah, there it is. There.

[Michael Batnik]

I would not. This is a bet. This is a bet against Netflix, which just broke out. Amazon, which is about to make a new high and Apple getting its mojo back. I wouldn't want to make that bet. I really wouldn't.

[Ben Carlson]

Wait, so this is the. So this is the Max 7 versus the 493. You don't think the Max 7 is going back?

[Michael Batnik]

Oh no, I. Wait, I don't know what's priced in what.

[Ben Carlson]

It's. It's. The Max 7 is on top and the 493 is on the bottom.

[Michael Batnik]

Oh.

[Ben Carlson]

So if you think it's a downtrend seven.

[Michael Batnik]

Yeah. You know what though? The problem is like the problem is half the mag 7 is problematic. I don't know what business Tesla is in in the second half of this year. I know the cars don't matter, but I also know the robots and the taxis away.

[Ben Carlson]

So, so you.

[Michael Batnik]

But that's in the, that's in the index. You forget about it.

[Ben Carlson]

Well, it's one of seven.

[Michael Batnik]

What does Microsoft bounce this year?

[Ben Carlson]

I don't know. And I think, I think the tech stories is back. I think it's all Nvidia, which, which I.

[Michael Batnik]

What do I do in that? What do I do with meta?

[Ben Carlson]

Hold.

[Michael Batnik]

Okay, hold on one sec. From the chat. Wake the barbarian. 4, 5, 7, 7. Netflix is not a utility. JB is full of it. Okay, tell me what. You tell me what percentage of Netflix users you think are going to cancel this year.

[Ben Carlson]

Yeah. Zero. It is a utility.

[Michael Batnik]

Zero.

[Ben Carlson]

It absolutely is. Utility. Like now it's stock is. Its stock is not a utility. Obviously it's very, you know, it's a high beta stock or it can be a high beta stock. It's a utility. Net.

[Michael Batnik]

Net positive subscriber additions every year, country around the world.

[Ben Carlson]

The business is a utility.

[Michael Batnik]

Okay. I mean, no offense.

[Ben Carlson]

Anyway, the final point, if Nvidia. If Nvidia is really going, and it sure looks like it's going, it's the highest this thing has gone sideways since July of 2025. If Nvidia makes new all time highs and it sure looks like it's going that way, the rest of tech is going to come with it.

[Michael Batnik]

Okay, listen, I, I think, I think, I'm not as sure in what I said just looking at the chart now that you told me what it is. Yeah. So you might have won me over. All right guys, that's it from us. Tomorrow is Wednesday, which means an all new edition of Animal Spirits with Ben Carlson and Michael Batnik. We'll do Ask the Compound later that day live on YouTube, same format as this. It's Ben and Duncan. They're asking your questions and you can get one in by sending an email to ask the compound showmail.com if you want compound merch, visit. I don't shop.com all new stuff in there for 2020 for summer 2026 and we will be back at the end of the week with an all new edition of the Compound. And friends, thank you so much. God bless. Good night.

[Podcast Disclaimer Narrator]

Redholtz Wealth Management is a registered investment advisor. Advisory services are only offered to clients or prospective clients where Ritholtz Wealth Management and its representatives are properly licensed or exempt from licensure. Nothing on this podcast should be construed as and may not be used in connection with an offer to sell or solicitation of an offer to buy or hold an interest in any security or investment product. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investing involves risk and possible loss of principal capital. No advice may be rendered by Ritholtz Wealth Management unless a client service agreement is in place.