Transcript
Joanna Penn (0:00)
Welcome to the Creative Penn Podcast. I'm Joanna Penn, thriller author and creative entrepreneur, bringing you interviews, inspiration and information on writing, craft and creative business. You can find the episode show notes, your free author blueprint and lots more@thecreativepenn.com and that's Pen with a double N. And here's the show hello creatives, I'm Joanna Penn and this is episode number 817 of the podcast and it is Sunday 29th June 2025. As I record this in today's show I'm talking to Jules Horne about writing for audio. We talk about the biggest industry shifts, including the move to subscription models and the impact of AI narration. An honest assessment of the quality of AI voices according to Jules, who has spent many years in this what are the tells and how quickly are they? As well as practical tips for adapting your non fiction book for audio, from handling visuals and numbers to structuring for listener retention, how to write with an audio first mindset, tips for fiction, and more. So that's all coming up in the Interview section in Writing, Publishing and AI Things. So my editor Kristin Tate is on the Words to Write by podcast talking about how she uses AI tools to help her in her editing business and also help those clients who embrace AI become better writers and produce better books. Kristin has been my editor for years now, pre generative AI and of course I use the tools in different ways and she has also embraced it. But of course she says it is crucial for authors to communicate their preferences and comfort levels regarding the use of AI tools with their editor. Kristen has a clear AI policy and adapts her approach based on individual needs, even turning off certain Microsoft Word Word features to ensure an absolute firewall if requested. So I think this is really important because I obviously say to Kristen, use everything you can to make my book a better book. And the quality of your prompts, the quality of your own knowledge helps so much. So her use of AI tools with my books really helps me. But she also has this thing where she will even she will not use it at all if clients say so. So I think that's a great idea having a AI policy as an editor in contract. So that might be something you want to check with your editor. AI tools can significantly streamline certain editorial tasks, freeing up time to focus on more complex issues. Kristen uses AI as like a power thesaurus to quickly suggest stronger verbs with a prompt like in this passage, I think the verb could be stronger. Can you give me five suggestions for a stronger verb? Also for generating chapter by chapter summaries of long manuscripts. Also invaluable for creating style sheets, tracking character details like names and hair color, and ensuring timeline consistency in complex plots like mysteries and thrillers. For non fiction, AI can act as an efficient research partner by tracking down original sources for quotes or facts. And on a personal note, I love deep research from Gemini really over chatgpt at the moment because it's so good and Kristin says it's essential for authors to independently check and verify any information provided by AI with reputable sources, as AI can hallucinate as if it doesn't know the answer. But I definitely find that Gemini hallucinates a lot less as it uses so many sources to verify, she says AI, particularly Claude, is shockingly good at writing book descriptions or back cover copy, a task many authors find challenging. It effectively combines the overall vibe of a book with concrete details drawing from millions of successful models. AI is also adept at identifying genre tropes that you might not have recognized, which is useful given how much readers love tropes in terms of weaknesses. AI is not equipped to handle higher level shifting the frame questions that a human editor can it won't ask if a passage is necessary, why it's there, or if it's slowing down the story. AI also doesn't get bored or confused like a human reader, which are critical indicators for an editor assessing tension or clarity. There are lots more interesting points in this interview that will help you personally whether you want to use these tools as part of your editing or also whether you want to work with an editor. And also I guess as we said, checking that your editor has an AI policy. So well worth a listen. And I know Kristen cares deeply about language and doing a great job as an editor. So that is the words to write by podcast and then digging deeper into AI this week because the big news is the generative AI fair use ruling is in two court cases. So the first is the case against Anthropic, which makes Claude, which was sued for violation of copyright for training on copyright works. The BBC and other Places report a US judge has ruled that using books to train artificial intelligence software is not a violation of U.S. copyright law. Anthropic's use of the books was exceedingly transformative and therefore allowed under US law, but rejected Anthropic's request to dismiss the case, ruling the firm would have to stand trial over the use of pirated copies as part of the library of material. So to be clear, they can use copyright works for training on data, but not copyright works in a pirated database, because obviously that was pirated. There was also a ruling in the case against Meta, as reported in Publishers Weekly. Again, the judge found Meta's use was highly transformative under copyright law's fair use doctrine, and the authors failed to present adequate evidence of how they were harmed by Metter's actions. But he also gave some tips on how they might win another time if they can show that models could generate works similar enough in subject matter or genre to compete with the originals. The court noted that generative AI has the potential to flood the market with endless amounts of images, songs, articles, books and more. Yet apparently the plaintiffs never so much as mentioned this, nor did they mention it in their summary judgment. So it seems that the case was badly presented, but that is two judgments for fair use using copyright data in training however, as I mentioned, the knowing use of pirated copies is still being litigated and there will be scope for bringing new cases if a flood of AI books competes with originals. There are still open court cases on this area and as I've said before, I would expect a flurry of settlements and licensing deals, especially as publishing companies themselves increasingly use AI tools. But if you have been waiting on the sidelines for these cases cases to be concluded and thinking that perhaps fair use wouldn't be found, well, perhaps with two cases in favour of fair use, it is time to jump in. So if you would want to go into more depth on this, have a listen to episode 792 a few months ago with Alicia Wright on fair use and copyright. We talked about this and this is exactly what we said we expected to happen. And Alisha works across intellectual property law and AI and is also an author, so she is very well placed to talk about that. So yes, that's episode 792 on Fair Use and copyright. I'll link in the show notes. So in personal news, well, Pilgrimage is out in French, so if you would like a review copy please email me joannathecreativepenn.com it's also coming in German in the next few weeks if you would like to read in German now. I did pay for a translation service so hopefully it's good. Regular listeners will know how much I care about my travel memoir Pilgrimage. So coming in French and German, not because I expect it to make a ton of money or in fact any money, but I just care about having this information out for people who want to go on pilgrimage and do like the Camino de Santiago and all of that kind of thing. And I met French People and a lot of Germans actually on that walk.
