Transcript
A (0:00)
Msw media.
A (0:23)
Hello and welcome to the Daily beans for Friday, December 5, 2025. Today, a federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia has refused to re indict New York Attorney General Letitia James. Members of Congress have viewed the entire video of the September 2nd boat strike, and many are calling for Hegseth's resignation. Admiral Halsey did not resign. Apparently, Hegseth pushed him out after he took issue with the operations in the Caribbean. The inspector general report on Signal Gate has been released, and it's as bad as we thought. A suspect has been arrested in the January 6th pipe bomb case. The Supreme Court is allowing Texas to keep its new gerrymandered Republican maps for the 2026 midterms. And there was a hearing today to disqualify John Sarcone as the U.S. attorney in the Northern District of New York. I'm Alison Gill.
B (1:11)
And I'm Dana Goldberg.
A (1:16)
Holy news day, Dana.
B (1:18)
I know. Wow. We're coming up to the end of the week, and it never stops. I feel like this always happens.
A (1:25)
It does. And all the news breaks, like, right before we get in the studio. So I'm like, updated script, updated script, updated scri. Sending them out over and over and over again. But it is Friday, so everyone can rejoice because it's Feeglesang Fridays here on the Daily Bean. So I'll be talking to John Fegelsong.
B (1:40)
Later in the show.
A (1:41)
I also just recorded Substack Live, which you can now see@mullershirote.com with Adam Klasveld from All Rise News to talk about some of the stuff that happened in the courts today. And also, Dana, the inspector general report is out from the Pentagon, and it says exactly what sources said it said yesterday when we talked about it. Basically, Hegseth sent classified information over a signal chat that was not secure and at that put U.S. troops in harm's way. Now, he refused to hand over his phone in the investigation, and he wouldn't agree to be interviewed either because he's totally innocent. But in his written answers, he said he declassified that information, and he does have declassification authority, but he's trying to retroactively declassify it. And I say retroactively because there was no notes or evidence of his declassification of that information at the time he sent it out. So I think he's retroactively declassifying it here, which there's really no way to disprove. It was the whole, you know, I declassified it with my mind sort of.
