Transcript
Amanda Sturgel (0:02)
It's no surprise that newsmakers try to manipulate the audience. They want you to believe that they are the one holding the line, and they'll use any trick they can to get you there. But don't let them fool you. Get Unspun I'm Amanda Sturgel. I've been a reporter and today I teach future reporters to cut the spin and think critically about what newsmakers say. My podcast, Unspun, shows you how to know when you're being manipulated by the news, learn to spot the tricks, and how to make up your own mind about what's true. So if you're tired of being fooled by the news, subscribe to Unspun today. Unspun because you deserve the truth.
Alison Gill (0:40)
MSW Media hey everybody, it's Ag. And welcome to Refried Beans, where we play an episode of the Daily Beans podcast from the same week as either one, two or three years ago so we can see how far we've come. So please enjoy this episode from days gone by and note the date in the intro.
John Fugelsang (1:03)
Refried beans. I like refried beans. That's why I want to try fried beans, because maybe they're just as good and we're wasting time.
Alison Gill (1:25)
Hello and welcome to the Daily beans for Friday, March 8, 2024. Today, Judge Kaplan has denied Trump's last minute bid to stay his payment to Eugene Carroll. The Navy apparently stripped Ronnie Jackson of his admiral rank before he left the military. Jack Smith has filed his oppositions to Trump's motions to dismiss the espionage and obstruction charges against him. Dean Phillips and Nikki Haley have dropped out of the presidential race. Trump is ordered to pay legal fees after a failed lawsuit against Christopher Steele. And Jared Kushner has been subpoenaed by an ex Trump staffer in a lawsuit. I'm your host, Alison Gill. Hey everybody, happy, happy, happy Friday. That you know it's Friday. That means it's Fugal saying Friday. So John Fugal saying will be joining me later in the show and I know I said Dana would be back today, but she's traveling. She's doing her show in Bend, Oregon. So if you don't have tickets to that, it's tonight, get them and go see her. She'll also be traveling on Sunday, so she will be back in your ears with me on Tuesday's episode of Daily Beans. Also, the State of the Union addresses tonight. I'll be watching and sharing on President Biden. We'll talk more about that on Monday's Beans. Pete, Pete Strzok and I will be in New York for a few days of Trump's first criminal trial. That is the Alvin Bragg Manhattan DA's case against him for 34 felony counts of falsification of business records in an attempt to to interfere in the 2016 election. Patrons, by the way, will be invited to a meet and greet while we're in New York. And Pete Strzok, Andy McCabe and I will be coming to the Hamilton Theater in D.C. in August for a live show. Details to come. Watch your inbox for that event. I will also be announcing more tour dates including, let's see, Seattle, Chicago, New York, Nashville, Boston, Philadelphia and Portland. I'll be announcing those Monday and I will have links to pre sale tickets and VIP meet and greet tickets. And there will be links in your show notes for patrons on posted on Patreon and in your inbox. That's this Monday, so look for those. Plus we'll have more shows announced soon, including St. Louis and Milwaukee, all kinds of places. I'm looking forward to seeing all of y' all out on the road. Patrons, you get pre sale and meet and greet access. You can become a patron@patreon.com MullerShiprot you'll also get these episodes ad free and early. Plus the peace of mind knowing that you're supporting independent media. Also today, Jack Smith has filed a ton of responses to Trump's motions to dismiss the espionage and obstruction indictments against him in the documents case, including scathing responses to Trump's assertions that the classified documents he stole were personal records under the Presidential Records act and that he's somehow immune to. He has some sort of presidential immunity for shit that he did post presidency. Andy McCabe and I will go over those in detail on this Sunday's episode of the Jack podcast. So with all that out of the way, we have a lot of news to get to today. Let's hit the hot notes. Hot notes. All right, first up, from Aaron Katerski, I hope I'm pronouncing that right. And Peter Charalambas at ABC News. A New York judge on Thursday denied Donald Trump's request for a temporary delay of the penalties in E. Jean Carroll's defamation case, leaving the former president three days to pay or post a bond for the entire $83.3 million judgment, plus interest, looking at about 91 to 92 million bucks. Quote, Mr. Trump's current situation is a result of his own dilatory actions. That's what Judge Lou Kaplan wrote in his order late Thursday, quote, he has had since January 26 to organize his Finances with the knowledge that he might need to bond this judgment. Yet he waited until 25 days after the jury verdict to file his prior motion for an unsecured or partially secured stay pending resolution of post trial motions. Kaplan said that Trump failed to show how the judgment constitutes an irreparable injury or demonstrates the expenses he faces by posting a bond in the case of. In the filing, Kaplan signaled he's still considering Trump's request for a reduced bond or a delay until the resolution of his post trial motions. He says, quote, the expense of ongoing litigation in the absence of a stay does not constitute irreparable injury in the relevant sense of that term. That's what Kaplan said. It's so fun to read these decisions. It reminds me of, you know, when somebody from the south says, well, bless your heart, you know, it's just kind of this really, you know, this does not constitute an irreparable injury in the relevant sense of that term. It's just, it's so nice. It's the, the snark and, and, and, and just, it's subsumed in the, in the proper legalese, and I love it. This decision follows a whirlwind month for the former president, whose lawyers have made a concrete push to delay a half a billion dollar lawsuit judgment in the New York Attorney General civil fraud trial. In January, a jury awarded Carol 83.3 million in damages after determining Trump defamed her while denying her claim that he sexually assaulted her in a department store in the 90s. Trump's lawyers had argued the case was wrongly decided and that covering the 83.3 million would cause the former president irreparable injury in the form of substantial costs. Yeah, that's the point of a defamation lawsuit is to hit you with a substantial cost. Lawyers for Carroll pushed back against the delay, arguing Trump failed to offer critical information about his own finances to justify the delay. Quote, the reasoning Trump offers in seeking this extraordinary relief boils down to nothing more than, trust me, that's what Carol's attorneys wrote. He doesn't offer any information about his finances or the nature and location of his assets. He doesn't specify what percentage of his assets are liquid or explain how Carol might go about collecting. Now, in a separate civil case, as we know, a New York judge ordered Trump pay 454 million or so in disgorgement plus prejudgment interest for a decade of fraudulent business practice. Now, Trump, through his attorneys, similarly argued that that decision was flawed, requesting a delay, and offered to pay a $100 million bond. Instead, Trump's lawyers said that if the court did not grant a stay, the former president might have to sell some of his properties to raise enough money to cover the bond. New York Attorney General Letitia James pushed back on that request, warning in a filing that Trump and his co defendants might actually be attempting to evade the financial penalty. Quote, contrary to the defendant's argument, there's substantial risk that defendants will attempt to evade enforcement of the judgment or make enforcement more difficult following the appeal. Now New York's Appellate Division denied the request for a stay of the financial penalties last week, but clarified Trump's ban on accessing New York based financing does not apply to bond companies. Quote I did nothing wrong except build a successful and very liquid company owning some of the greatest properties in the world, trump said on social media following the ruling. Now the deadline back to Eugene is to pay that 83.3 million plus plus interest is Monday and the Trump 454 million dollar judgment that that deadline is later this month. Pete and I are going to cover all this on next week's Cleanup on Aisle 45 podcast. Next up from Brian Meliot, the Associated Press More financial trouble for Donald Trump. He's been ordered to pay a six figure legal bill to a company founded by a former British spy that he unsuccessfully sued for making what his lawyer called shocking and scandalous false claims that harmed his reputation. A London judge who threw out the case against Orbis Business Intelligence last month, saying it was bound to fail, ordered Trump to pay legal fees of about 300,000 pounds. That's like $385,000. That's according to documents released on Thursday. Orbis was founded by Chris Steele. He once ran the Russia desk for Britain's Secret Intelligence Service known as MI6. The British court case was one of few in which Trump, who is almost sure to win the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, was not a defendant as he faces massive legal problems back home. Trump is charged in four criminal cases and faces civil complaint in the U.S. courts. He lost a subsequent defamation case in which a jury found him liable for sexual abuse. And he's been ordered to pay 355 million for a fraud verdict against his businesses. Now Steele was paid by the Democrats for research that included salacious allegations Russians could potentially use to blackmail Trump. The P Tapes member the so called Steele Dossier assembled in 2016 created a political storm just before Trump's inauguration with rumors and uncorroborated allegations that have since been largely discredited and don't forget, while the Democrats did pay for that oppo research, it was Republicans that were paying for it first. Trump sued the company, saying that the dossier was phony and Orbis had violated British data protection laws. Attorney Hugh Tomlinson said in an October hearing that the former president, quote, suffered personal and reputational damage and distress over claims that the dossier that he'd taken part in sex parties in St. Petersburg and consorted with sex workers in Moscow. Now, Tomlinson said the dossier, quote, contained shocking and scandalous claims about the personal conduct of President Trump and included allegations that he paid bribes to Russian officials to further his business interests. Orbis said the lawsuit should be thrown out because the report was never meant to be made public and it was published by BuzzFeed without permission of Steele or Orbis. It also said the claim was filed too late. Judge Karen Stain or Stein, I'm not sure which the proper pronunciation is, but she sided with Orbis in her February 1st ruling and she issued an order several days later on the legal costs. She cut the amount of legal bills that Orbis incurred from 634,000 pounds by more than half because she said it was high considering there had only been a one day hearing. In 2022, a US federal judge in Florida dismissed a Trump lawsuit against Steele 2016. Democratic rival Hillary Clinton and former FBI officials remember that lawsuit. It was like Pete Strzok, Andy McCain, like Hillary Clinton, everybody was on there. And the judge in Florida dismissed that suit, rejecting Trump's claims that they helped concoct the Russia investigation that overshadowed much of his administration. So womp, womp, he owes another 300 grand. Next from Dara Gregorian, NBC the Candyman Rep. Ronnie Jackson, he's a Republican congressman from Texas now, was quietly demoted by the Navy after a Defense Department Inspector general report found that he'd engaged in inappropriate conduct while serving as the top White House phys for Presidents Barack Obama and Donald Trump. That's according to records obtained by NBC News. Jackson, who was a rear admiral when he retired from the Navy in 2019, is now listed as a captain, according to his service records. A spokesperson for the Navy declined to comment on Jackson's rank, but said in a statement to NBC News that the substantiated allegations in the DO D IG investigation of Rear Admiral Lower half Ronnie Jackson are not in keeping with the standards the Navy requires of its leaders and as such the Secretary of the Navy took administrative action in July of 2022. The spokesperson would not elaborate on what the administrative action was. A current Defense official and former US Official who spoke on the condition of anonymity, told the Washington Post, which first reported the demotion, that it was a reduction in rank. A spokesperson for Jackson did not immediately respond to NBC News's request for comment in a page on his congressional website and on Twitter. In his bio, Jackson still refers to himself as a retired US Navy rear admiral with nearly three decades of military service completed in 2021. The Inspector General's review found Jackson drank booze, made sexual comments to subordinates and took the sedative Ambien while working as the White House physician. It also found he mistreated subordinates and disparaged, belittled, bullied and humiliated them. Jackson pushed back against the findings, telling reporters Democrats were, quote, using this report to repeat and rehash untrue attacks on my integrity because, quote, I have refused to turn my back on President Trump. Okay, good. Jackson was first assigned to the White House Medical Unit in 2006 and ascended to the top post there during the Obama administration. He also hit it off with Trump, whom he effusively praised after giving him a physical in 2018. He has incredibly good genes and it was just the way God made him, jackson said, adding he thought Trump could live to be 200 years old if he just ate better. That year, Trump nominated Jackson to head the Department of Veterans affairs, which is when the allegations of improper conduct first became public. Jackson later withdrew his name for consideration while insisting he'd done nothing wrong. Quote, unfortunately, because of how Washington works, these false allegations have become a distraction for this president and the important issues we must be addressing. How we give the best care to our nation's heroes, huh? He remained steadfast as a Trump ally and was elected to the House of representatives in 2020. And as we know, and I've spoken to Miles Taylor about this when I interviewed him about his book blowback on C Span Book TV that Trump wanted to gut the Department of Veterans affairs and I think Ronny Jackson was supposed to help him do it. Next up from Sarah K. Burris at Raw Story. Donald Trump's son in law, Jared Kushner, has been subpoenaed to testify in a trial regarding a lawsuit filed against Trump's campaign by a former staffer who says she was pun after a supervisor got her pregnant. Matthew Russell Lee from Inner City Press published the subpoena online. It demands Kushner appear before the court in New York on March 27 and bring with him documents regarding, discussing and or concerning Jason Miller from December 2016 to July 2020. The case involves a claim by an ex staffer. We know her as AJ Delgado, who said she lost her responsibilities after she had an affair with with Supervisor Miller during Trump's 2016 campaign and got pregnant. She alleges discrimination by the Trump campaign. Quote, the father and I were dating for two months. He was separated from his wife, he said, and had been since June. That's what Delgado wrote on social media in 2017. A 2017 piece in Page Six claimed the two hadn't spoken since she told Miller she was pregnant. Instead, they've communicated only through lawyers. She has said. Kushner, who had a central role in Trump's campaign and the White House, was involved in a decision not to hire her when Trump won power last month. She started a GoFundMe account to find the money needed to continue her case. Quote, as some of you may know, I have a case which the Trump campaign managed to delay for years against the Trump campaign for pregnancy discrimination and breach of contract based on my not receiving my well earned White House job after I became pregnant by Jason Miller, my supervisor. That's what she wrote. If you're wondering whether Miller has fared a similar fate, he's currently Trump's top advisor and flies everywhere with him. So no, that's what she said. And she went on to say, while almost everyone who takes on Trump and maga, such as E. Jean Carroll, has the benefit of free attorneys and no legal costs, the attorneys front the costs or rich benefactors such as Reid Hoffman, I do not. It's just me, David against Goliath, she said in a post that she intends to depose, among others, Eric Trump, Trump adviser Brad Parscale and Jared Kushner. Remember Brad Parscale got tackled and having a beer outside of his house. Remember that guy? Fantastic. And from Carter Sherman at the Guardian, the Republican led Kentucky Senate voted overwhelmingly on Tuesday to grant the right to collect child support for fetuses, advancing the bill that garnered bipartisan support despite nationwide fallout from a controversial Alabama decision also advancing fetal personhood. The measure would allow a parent to seek child support up to a year after giving birth to retroactively cover pregnancy expenses. The legislation, Senate Bill 110, won Senate passage on a 36 to 2 vote with little discussion to advance to the House. Republicans have super majorities in both chambers. The Republican state Senator Whitney Westerfield said afterward that the broad support reflects a recognition that pregnancy carries with it an obligation for the other parent to help cover the expenses incurred during those nine months. Westerfield is a staunch abortion opponent and a sponsor of this bill. Quote, I believe life begins at conception, she said while presenting the measure to oh, it's he. Whitney Westerfield is a he. I apologize, Whitney. Whitney Westerfield said that while presenting this measure to his colleagues, quote, but even if you don't, there's no question that there are obligations and costs involved with having a child before the child is born. The measure sets a strict time limit, allowing a parent to retroactively seek child support for pregnancy expenses up to one year after giving birth, quote, so if there's not a child support order until the child's eight, this isn't going to apply. That's what Westerfield said when the bill was reviewed recently in Senate committee. Even at a year and a day, this doesn't apply. It's only for orders that are in place within a year of the child's birth. And also from the Guardian Elon Musk is facing $128 million lawsuit from four former Twitter executives who allege that Musk failed to pay them severance after buying Twitter. The suit, filed on Monday in California, follows a separate legal complaint last year by Rank and file employees seeking 500 million in unpaid severance, quote, because Musk decided he didn't want to pay the plaintiffs severance benefits, he simply fired them without reason, then made up fake cause and appointed employees of his various companies to uphold his decision. That's what the suit says. The four plaintiffs in the case include Twitter's former CEO, let's see, Agrawal I believe is his last name, former CFO Ned Seagal, former general counsel Sean Edgett and former chief legal officer. Let's see, Vijaya Gaddy I hope I'm pronouncing that correctly. Musk fired all of them amid a string of mass layoffs after he acquired Twitter for $44 billion in 2022, claiming at the time he didn't have to pay the executive severance because they were terminated for cause. The lawsuit is one of several legal actions related to Musk's unwilling takeover of Twitter and subsequent operation of the platform, which he renamed X. The National Labor Relations Board also issued a complaint earlier this year alleging that Musk's SpaceX rocket company illegally fired eight workers because they issued a letter criticizing his leadership. So he's facing all kinds of lawsuits and my big question is why he is the sole contractor for national security satellite launches in this country. There's one other, but I think that contract is about to or has expired and we rely heavily on him not only for that, but for, you know, I know Ukraine relies on Starlink, his communications thing, for their, you know, on the ground communications. And he has shut them off or failed to turn them on during critical points during the conflict, during the war. And it's. It, I hope. Now, I know the government doesn't always tell us what's going on, but I hope with everything in me that they are reconsidering the contract, the national security contract, that, that our, that our satellites depend upon with Elon Musk because he should not have that much power over our government, frankly. Now, the problem is those contracts can take years to secure. Years. And there's just no one else right now as a backup. So it's not something that the government can just snap their fingers and change. But I hope, I hope they're at least talking about it. We haven't heard much as far, you know, as far as public reporting goes, but that's something that needs to be considered. All right, everybody, stick around. We'll be right back with John Fugelsang for Fugl saying Fridays. And then I will be back with the good news after these messages.
