A (0:00)

You can always count on Sunday to be the best day of the week. You can sleep in, go off your diet, spend the day in your pajamas and go on have that second croissant. You know what else you can count on every Sunday? The Martin Sheen Podcast. Join me, your host, Martin Sheen for beautifully crafted 20 minute programs filled with never before heard stories of my life along with personal reflections and poetry that inspires. And season two beginning begins Sunday, February 1st. The Martin Sheen Podcast is the perfect Sunday relaxing companion. A chance to put your feet up, take a deep breath and enjoy some stress free listening time from the comfort of your favorite easy chair and that second croissant that stays between us. There's no judgment here, so make my podcast your weekly moment of calm as we explore faith, hope, love and and what it means to be human. And rest assured, this journey is ever unfolding as I invite you to see what's next with me, Martin Sheen. So let's keep Sunday the best day of the week together and thank you for listening.

B (1:16)

MSW Media. News we're swearing Jelly beans. Jelly beans. Hello and welcome to the Daily beans for Wednesday, January 28, 2026. Today, Gregory Bovino has been demoted and sent back to El Centro as Tom Homan heads to Minneapolis. Kristi Noem has thrown Stephen Miller under the bus, telling reporters that he fed her the domestic terrorist language she used. Democrats in the Senate start coalescing around a list of demands to fund the government. The Kilmar Abrego Vindictive and selective prosecution hearing has been canceled due to bad weather. The Department of Justice said there will be no civil rights investigation into the murder of Alex Preddy. Trump holds a two hour meeting with Kristi Noem amid backlash from Minneapolis. A US Judge orders the ICE chief to appear in court or be held in contempt. And two drug boat survivors have filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the Trump administration. I'm your host, Allison Gill. Hey everybody. Dana is out today. She had made some last minute travel plans. Also, the long awaited Abrego hearing that I've been waiting for this for months. It's been canceled. This is the hearing on vindictive and selective prosecution where the government has to prove they're not vindictively and selectively prosecuting him. It was supposed to be today, but it's been postponed. And here's the little note from the court. It says the court convened a telephone call with all parties. The parties agreed that continuing the evidentiary hearing set for January 28 was in the best interest of the parties due to weather the hearing is canceled, the party shall provide the court with at least three agreeable dates to reschedule the evidentiary hearing. But everybody, we do have a lot of news to get to today, regardless of not being able to cover that hearing. So let's hit the hot notes. Hot notes. All right, first up from the Atlantic, Gregory Bevino has been removed from his role as Border Patrol commander at large and will return to his former job in El Centro, California, where he's expected to retire soon. And that's according to a DHS official and two people with knowledge. Bovino's sudden demotion is the clearest sign yet that the Trump administration is reconsidering its most aggressive tactics. After the Murder Saturday of 37 year old Alex Preddy by Border Patrol agents under Bovino's command, President Trump appeared to signal in a series of social media posts a tactical shift in the administration's mass deportation campaign. Trump wrote that he spoke with Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, whom the White House had blamed for inciting violence. And the two men are now, quote, on a similar wavelength. Tom Homan, the former ICE chief who Trump has designated the border czar, will head to Minnesota to assume command of the federal mobilization there. That's according to Donald Trump. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and her close advisor Corey Lewandowski, who were Bovino's biggest backers at dhs, are also at risk of losing their jobs, according to two people familiar who spoke to the Atlantic. Now the New York Times reported that Trump met Monday night in the Oval Office with Kristi Noem and Corey Lewandowski for nearly two hours as his administration tries to shift its strategy after federal agents killed a second Minneapolis resident over the weekend. The meeting came after Ms. Noem requested to see the president. And that's according to the people who spoke on the condition of anonymity. Trump apparently did not suggest during the meeting that either Ms. Gnomes or Mr. Lewandowski's jobs were at risk. But it was the latest sign that the president is concerned about the bipartisan criticism of the administration's response to the murder of Alex Preddy, who was shot 10 times by immigration agents on Saturday after he was apparently filming with his iPhone. The Oval Office meeting also included several of Trump's top aides, including Susie Wiles, his chief of Caroline Levitt, the press secretary Stephen Chung, his communications director. Oddly, Stephen Miller, the top aide to Trump who oversees the administration's immigration strategy, was not part of the meeting. That's interesting to note. Now, the meeting came the same Day as Trump announced he was sending Tom Homan, the border czar, to oversee the operations in Minneapolis. The move was seen as a way to elevate an official who is steeped in Immigration and Customs Enforcement's long standing practice as of prioritizing targeted arrests rather than the kinds of sweeping raids the Trump administration has carried out in cities across the country. At the same time, the administration was planning to move Gregory Bavino at Border Patrol. He's the official whose harsh tactics have drawn sharp criticism and they were planning to move him out of the city. Now, Kristi Noem has been the face of the administration's immigration crackdown and she's been among the most vocal in spreading false accusations against Mr. Preddy, including labeling him a domestic terrorist. But get this, Kristi Noem's language that Alex Preddy wanted to massacre federal agents on all of that, that was dictated to Noem and her department by the man most responsible for the controversial operation, Stephen Miller. That's according to four sources who spoke to Axios. Quote, everything I've done, I've done at the direction of the president. And Stephen, that's what Kristi Noem told someone to relayed her remarks to Axios. Quote, stephen heard gun and knew what the narrative would be. Preddy came to massacre cops. That's according to another source familiar with the strategy. Quote, others within the White House attempted to clean up the DHS statement prior to it being sent, but it had already been disseminated. That's what someone else told Axios. Now something else happening from Ms. Now President Donald Trump's Justice Department has decided there will be no civil rights investigation into the fatal shooting of Alex Preddy. Instead, two units of DHS will investigate their officers and the man they killed, according to three people briefed on the steps and internal records reviewed by msnow. A Customs and Border Protection office will investigate whether its own officers followed agency policy in the shooting, according to the people. Another DHS unit, Homeland Security Investigations hsi, will investigate whether Preddy broke any laws. That unit is part of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and normally focuses on tracking down human trafficking and narcotics rings and threats to national security. Now they're investigating Preddy. It was widely assumed the Justice Department would also not conduct an independent civil rights probe of Preddy shooting after choosing not to launch a probe of the fatal shooting of Renee Goode on January 7th. That view was reinforced when news broke this weekend that DHS would take the lead in the Preddy probe. An FBI document described to MsNow says that Border Patrol officials requested FBI help gathering evidence after the shooting, but that all evidence, excluding firearms and casings, were turned over to dhs. Officials from the bca. The Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension say that it is investigating Saturday's shooting, but a spokesperson told Ms. Now that federal agents are not sharing information from any probe the federal government has launched, nor has BCA been given access to any evidence. A Justice Department official confirmed there's no current DOJ investigation, but said, we are not going to prejudge the facts. Really, you're not. You're not going to come out and say he was going to massacre cops and that he's a domestic terrorist because there's a lot of prejudging going on? Ms. Now continues. some later point, if the evidence presents itself, we may investigate. Evidence doesn't present itself, you go and find it, you dumb fucks. Now, as the White House reels from Republican backlash over a second American killed in Minneapolis clashes between protesters and federal immigration officers, both current and former FBI and Justice Department investigators say the handling of the Preddy shooting and of the shooting of Renee Goode violates Justice Department policy and deviates dramatically from how such a shooting by an officer should be probed. They grimly warn that the Trump administration's response since Saturday, which included a false description of the shooting before any investigation had been conducted, signals a Justice Department no longer devoted to facts and fairness. So thanks to msnow for that reporting. Now, in a couple of days, Democrats in the Senate are going to have to decide on a government funding strategy or a not funding the government strategy. This story comes from me@military road.com and to write this article I spoke with several appropriations experts on background. So these people are way smarter than me. So that's where I get my information from. For this article, I say it as you probably know by now, a lot of the government is set to shut down on January 31st without funding, and at least seven Democrats are needed to advance the package. In the Senate, it may be more Democrats if a couple of Republicans are no votes. The six bills that have been lumped together to vote on include T HUD, SFOps, or State and Foreign Operations Labor, HHS and ED FSGG, which is general government services like Washington D.C. the Executive Office of the President and the Courts and then Defense and then dhs. Those are the six. However, ice, which is part of dhs, receives supplemental funding from the Big Ugly bill and those funds are available during a shutdown. So keep that in mind. If the government shuts down, ICE continues to be fully Funded and unrestricted detention centers, operations, flights, payroll, all of it. Customs and Border Protection is also funded during a shutdown by the BBB with about $60 billion. Right now, Democrats are circling around five demands to reform ICE and Customs and Border Protection that would be needed to secure their votes for cloture on this funding package. There's no final list yet, but most seem to agree on these five. And this is according to Senator Chris Murphy, who appeared with Greg Sargent on an episode of the Daily Blast. Those five demands are that DHS must cooperate with state investigations. That's huge. That Customs and Border Protection stays at the border. That's also a big deal. That judicial warrants are required for arrest, which they are under the fourth Amendment. But I guess they want to drive that point home. They're asking for officer identification and body worn cameras and that agents stay out of churches and schools. Now, when discussing these five demands, Senator Chris Murphy said, quote, if we do not fight right now, I think it could result in a massive withdrawal from participation in politics altogether. And that's how democracy dies. We have to show as the primary opposition party that we're willing to stand up and fight for the country. So also keep that in mind. One of our most progressive senators says that these demands are a fight that we should take on. But many people have asked me why one of those demands isn't that we rescind the $135 billion in ICE and Customs and Border Protection slush fund money from the big ugly bill. Well, as of last week, the consensus was that clawing back those funds would be a non starter for Republicans, which would lead to a shutdown of those agencies I mentioned. And the problem with that plan is that some of the stuff that would get shut down include things that would be at risk, like SSI payments, which would be set to end April 1st. It would halt new NIH grants. It would pause new clinical trials. So if you were about to start a clinical trial for a life saving drug, you'd be kicked off that trial. It would put Section 8 at risk. Annual Head Start grants would not go out, stuff like that. TSA wouldn't be paid, likely leading to airports shutting down. And all the while ICE and Customs and Border Protection would still be fully funded and operational doing all their stuff. That was the thinking a couple of days ago. But two things. A lot has changed in the last 48 to 72 hours. The Republicans have blinked. Trump has sent Bavino packing after a productive call with Tim Walls. Replaced him with border czar Tom Homan. Kristi Noem and Lewandowski, like I said, spent two hours in the Oval Office Monday when the decision was made to swap out Customs and Border Protection leadership. Multiple Republicans and right wing pundits from Senator Curtis of Utah to Governor Greg Abbott have spoken out against what ICE is doing. Tim Pool called Trump weak and said, I don't see him winning this one. Mike Pence called for an independent investigation into the murder of Alex Preddy. Trump officials were upset with Bovino and Noem's blatant lies right after the murder. Even the New York Post is calling Kristi Noem iced Barbie. I have not seen this level of criticism from the right since the days following January 6th. Even moderate Democrats who usually vote for funding are either regretting their vote in the House like Tom Suozzi, or vowing to block funding in the Senate like Cortez Masto and Jackie Rosen, with some of them even calling for the impeachment of Kristi Noemi. And today, Hakeem Jeffries said that if Trump didn't fire Noem immediately that he would begin drafting articles of impeachment. So with this dramatic fallout, the landscape has changed considerably since last week when we thought that demanding a rescission or clawing back of the big ugly funding for ICE and Customs and Border Protection was a non starter. Second, Democrats will likely demand the DHS funding bill be pulled out as a separate bill. Now that would require the rest of the bills to go back to the House if they pass the Senate. And if Republicans refuse to do that, if they refuse to pull DHS out, then the broader shutdown of the government would be on Republicans. That would be their refusal. Now, Senator Murphy said on that podcast of the broader defunding of ice. He said, quote, I think the fight is in the Senate right now. I mean, we have real power. We can decide not to shut down the entirety of these operations because as you know, even if the DHS doesn't have appropriations, they still have $70 billion left over from the reconciliation bill. That's the BBB. But it's not easy for them to transfer over all their operations from regular budgetary appropriations to money from the big beautiful bill. It would slow them down, it would slow the illegality down. But I think we should just focus on this legislative moment in which we hold power. We can constrain their illegality. That's probably the most important thing. We can show people that we're not willing to back down and that we aren't powerless. So Senator Chris Murphy is saying that by looking for these 5ish reforms or whatever, they land on the constraints on ICE and Customs and Border Protection that is the fight. However, I have spoken to some who have told me that a few Democrats might be considering a demand to rescind at least some of that ICE funding from the BBB in addition to the restrictions listed above. But consider this. Republicans won't agree to fully defund their own agenda, and we can't make demands for broad reforms without having the majority in at least one of the houses of Congress. Now, personally, I think it's worth a shot to try to claw back some of that slush fund. Go big or go home, right? And since we have Republicans on the ropes and they're especially vulnerable right now, we might be able to get it done. But I'm not going to fault Democrats if we're unable to rescind that slush fund and end up with only restrictions like the one Senator Murphy discussed. I'd rather have some guardrails in place than a broader shutdown that endangers some of the most vulnerable among us with zero restrictions on fully funded ICE and CBP operations. All right, next up from the post, Minnesota's chief federal judge has demanded the acting head of U.S. immigration and Customs Enforcement personally appear in court on Friday, threatening to hold him in contempt for what the judge described as repeated defiance of court orders amid the agency's enforcement efforts in the state. Quote, the court's patience is at an end. That's U.S. district Judge Patrick Schlitz. And he wrote this in a remarkable filing late Monday summoning acting ICE Director Todd Lyons to his courtroom. Schlitz cited several instances in which ICE failed to grant detained immigrants bond hearings that had been ordered by the courts. Quote, the court acknowledges that ordering the head of the federal agency to personally appear is an extraordinary step. That's what Schlitz wrote. He's an appointee of G.W. bush, by the way, and former law clerk of Scalia, he went on to say. But the extent of ICE's violation of court orders is likewise extraordinary, and lesser measures have been tried and failed. Schlitz's summons arose out of a case involving an Ecuadorian man who remains in ICE custody despite the judge ordering his release more than two weeks ago. The judge said he would cancel Friday's hearing and the summons of Lyons if the agency could prove before then that the detained migrant had been released. Since the start of the Trump administration's immigration enforcement effort in Minnesota, dubbed Operation Metro surge, the state's seven full time U.S. district judges and and a stable of semi retired colleagues have struggled to manage a sharply increased caseload. Court dockets have swelled with hundreds of cases involving immigrants seeking release from ICE detention. This month alone, federal judges in Minnesota have filed more than 280 requests. That's according to a Washington Post analysis of court dockets in the state. Those figures mark a steep rise from previous months, when the number of such filings rarely reached 10 per month. 280 versus 10, quote. It's put a tremendous burden on our court staff and on lawyers. That's U.S. district Judge Eric Tod, a Trump appointee. He said that at a court hearing Monday in St. Paul, quote, They've been asked to respond or prepare filings on remarkably short timetables. Our court staff has essentially been working around the clock. The escalation in filings has come as the Minnesota courts have also been tasked with hearing broader cases, grappling with thorny legal questions about the legality of the surge and the investigation of the fatal shooting Saturday of Alex Preddy by Border Patrol, quote, I think it kind of goes without saying that we're in a shockingly unusual time. That's what District Judge Kate Menendez said Monday at a hearing on a request from Minnesota authorities to curtail ICE's operations. Just days earlier, Menendez, who was appointed by Biden, had issued an order in a separate case barring federal agents deployed as part of the surge from detaining or using tear gas against peaceful protesters. That decision has been stayed by an appeals court amid the flood of cases. Schlitz and the district's other judges have repeatedly expressed exasperation through a series of increasingly sharply worded rulings over what they have described as the administration's failure to comply with their orders in immigration cases and unprecedented conduct by prosecutors pushing to charge demonstrators protesting ICE's operations in the state. There has been an undeniable move by the government in the past month to defy court orders, or at least to stretch the legal process to the breaking point in an attempt to deny noncitizens their due process rights. That was Senior U.S. district Judge Michael Davis, an appointee of Clinton, who wrote Sunday in a ruling ordering the release of an Ecuadorian migrant detained last month. Much of the conflict with the Minnesota judges has been driven by the Trump administration's move to overturn years of legal precedent and require mandatory detention for all immigrants facing deportation across the country. The overwhelming majority of judges, including many Trump appointees, have ruled that the policy is unlawful and that noncitizens must be provided a chance to seek their release on bond while awaiting deportation proceedings. The issue has reached a crisis point in Minnesota as immigration authorities have swept up scores of migrants. Davis, in a separate ruling last week, decried the government's treatment of illegal refugee from Myanmar who was detained earlier this month and immediately moved to a detention center in Texas, leaving behind her family, including a five month old infant she was nursing. She was flown out of Minnesota before she had the opportunity to challenge her detention on the grounds for her removal from the country. Quote, there's simply no legal reason for keeping this mother 1800 miles away from her family, davis wrote, adding later in his ruling, there is something particularly craven about transferring a nursing refugee mother out of state. In other instances, Schlitz cited in his order Monday summoning Lyons to court, some immigrants who had been granted bond hearings by the courts had seen their detentions extended instead or had been flown out of state despite orders that ICE keep them in Minnesota. Schlitz said the courts had been extremely patient with the government throughout, even though it decided to send thousands of agents to Minnesota to detain aliens without making any provisions for dealing with the hundreds of habeas petitions and other lawsuits that were sure to result. Schlitz vented similar frustrations with the federal surge in a remarkable series of missives he sent last week in the St. Louis based U.S. court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit, which oversees matters arising from Minnesota and six other states. Quote, I'm also dealing with a number of emergencies, including a lockdown at the Minneapolis courthouse because of protest activity, the defiance of several court orders by ICE and the illegal detention of many detainees by ICE, including yesterday a 2 year old. That letter came in response to a series of highly unusual moves the Justice Department undertook last week in its push to charge anti ICE demonstrators who interrupted a Jan. 18 church service in St. Paul. Prosecutors have charged three protesters with conspiring to violate the congregants constitutionally protected rights to religious expression. But a US Magistrate judge refused to sign arrest warrants for another five of those people, including Don Lemon, former CNN anchor, and one of his producers. Citing a lack of probable cause. Justice Department lawyers rushed to push Schlitz to overturn that decision, and when he refused, they raced to the 8th Circuit describing the case as a national security emergency. The appeals court rejected the government's request to intervene, and the Justice Department has since dropped its efforts to overturn the magistrate judge's decision. But before that conclusion, Schlitz described the department's conduct in the case as unprecedented. In his letters to the appellate court, the worst behavior alleged about any of them is yelling horrible things at the members of the church. None committed any acts of violence, he wrote. He said he had surveyed judges in Minnesota and in other courts in the 8th Circuit's jurisdiction, none of whom could remember such aggressive tactics by prosecutors when required by judges to bolster a criminal case. The reason this never happens is likely that if the government does not like the magistrate judge's decision, it can either improve the affidavit and present it again to the same magistrate judge, or it can present its case to a grand jury and seek an indictment of Lemon and his producer. Schlitz added in a separate letter, quote, there is no evidence that these two engaged in any criminal behavior or even conspired to do so. Though much of the judge's correspondence to the appeals court was focused on the details of the protester's case, his letter Friday also offered a rare glimpse into of the personal strain the administration surge has placed on judges dealing with the fallout. Schlitz noted that the Justice Department's demands for immediate action had come while he was working from home and caring for his adult son, who is mentally disabled. Meanwhile, immigration raids continued to roil his city, protests abounded, and within hours of his last letter, Preddy would be fatally shot. Amy Sweezy, a University of Minnesota law professor, praised Schlitz and the other federal judges in Minnesota for their efforts to handle the increased caseload serve fairly as independent arbiters of the law. But it is impossible, she added, for them to do so completely divorced from what's happening outside their courtrooms. Quote, they're members of this community. They live here and they're experiencing it too. Now, as I was writing this script today and as I was putting that story in these notes, Roger Parloff posted on social media, quote, the petitioner whose non release prompted Chief Judge Schlitz to threaten ICE Director Todd Lyons with contempt has now been released, according to what the civil chief of the U.S. attorney's office has told his attorney and what his attorney has relayed to me. All right, Next up from NBC, family members of two Trinidadian men were killed in a U.S. strike on an alleged drug smuggling boat in October and they are suing the US Government. They filed their lawsuit Tuesday accusing it of wrongful death and extrajudicial killings. The lawsuit is the first of its kind to be filed against the Trump administration in federal court over its military campaign against alleged drug smuggling vessels in the Caribbean. Chad Joseph, 26, and Rishi Samarou, who's 41, were killed in the U.S. military strike Oct. 14 when they were on a boat traveling from Venezuela to Trinidad. Their family members allege this in the lawsuit. The lawsuit says Joseph and Samaru, quote, had been fishing in the waters off the Venezuelan coast and worked on farms in Venezuela. It says they were returning to their home in Las Cuevas in Trinidad and Tobago when their boat was struck. Kegseth and Trump said the strike killed all six men on the boat. Trump described them as six male narco terrorists and said the boat was affiliated with a designated terrorist organization and that it was trafficking narcotics. The strike was the administration's fifth in a campaign that had struck three dozen boats and killed at least 125 people. In response to a request for comment, a spokesperson for the Pentagon said, per long standing department policy, we don't comment on ongoing litigation. NBC News asked the White House for comment now. The families were not notified that their loved ones had been killed, but both held memorial services after they learned of the October 14th strike and after Joseph and Samarou were never heard from again. Joseph's mother and Samarou's sister are suing the government on behalf of the two men's surviving family members. The lawsuits were filed by lawyers from the aclu, the center for Constitutional Rights, Jonathan Hafetz, a professor at Seton Hall Law School, and the ACLU of Massachusetts. It says the Oct. 14 airstrike violated two federal statutes, the Death on the High Seas act, which allows family members to sue over wrongful deaths that occur more than three nautical miles from the United States, and the Alien Tort statute, which allows foreign nationals to sue in federal court over violations of international law. The Trump administration has told members of Congress that the US Is in a non international armed conflict with drug cartels, citing that as a justification for using lethal military force. The lawsuit challenges that justification. It says there's no armed conflict and that therefore the laws of war do not apply. These premeditated and intentional killings lack any plausible legal justification. Thus, they were simply murders ordered by individuals at the highest level of government and obeyed by military officers in the chain of command. The lawsuit quotes the Trinidadian government as saying the government has no information linking Joseph or Samarou to illegal activities and that it has no information of the victims of US Strikes being in possession of illegal drugs, guns or small arms. Joseph's mother and Samaru's sister say in the lawsuit that the two men were the primary breadwinners for their families and they were simply returning home from working in Venezuela when they were killed. According to the lawsuit, Joseph lived in Las Cuevas, Trinidad with his common law wife and their three minor children, but he often traveled the 20 nautical miles to Venezuela for work. He would sometimes stay in Venezuela for weeks or even months, and during this trip he had been working there since April. The lawsuit says that in the weeks before he was killed, Joseph had struggled to find a boat in Venezuela to take him back to Trinidad. It says he became increasingly fearful of making the trip home after the Trump administration began its boat strike campaign. The lawsuit says Joseph called his wife and mother daily and that his last call was on October 12th to tell them that he had found a ride back home, but he never returned. Quote Chad was a loving and caring son who was always there for me, for his wife and children, our whole family. I will miss him terribly. We all do. That's Joseph's mother, Lenore Burnley said in a statement, went on to say, we know this lawsuit won't bring Chad back to us, but we're trusting God to carry us through this and we hope that speaking out will help us get the truth and closure we need. Sam Rue worked in construction before he spent 15 years in prison for his participation in a homicide and also frequently traveled to Venezuela for work in construction and farming. According to the suit, he shared photos of the farm he was working on with his sister before he died. Rishi used to call our family almost every day and then one day he disappeared and we never heard from him again. That's Sally Car Korra Singh, Rishi Samaru's sister. Quote Rishi was a hard working man who paid his debt to society and was just trying to get back on his feet again to make a decent living in Venezuela and help provide for his family. If the US Government believed Rishi had done anything wrong, it should have arrested, charged and detained him, not murdered him. They must be held accountable. All right everybody, we have some good news we need to get to. So everybody stick around. We'll be right back. Wild Grain is the first baked from frozen subscription box for artisanal bread, seasonal pastries and fresh pastas and everything bakes in 25 minutes or less. I love that they use simple ingredients you can actually pronounce. Plus the slow fermentation process is easier on your gut and richer in nutrients and antioxidants with no preservatives or shortcuts. And the boxes are fully customizable including varieties, variety of stuff like gluten free boxes, vegan boxes, they have a new protein box. It's pretty amazing. So this episode of The Daily Beans is brought to you by Wild Grain. Check this deal out. Right now, Wild grain is offering $30 off your first box plus free croissants in every box when you go to wildgrain.com dailybeans to start your subscription. Or you can use promo code dailybeans at checkout. I keep Wild Grain in rotation all winter and every delivery feels like a little gift to my future self. The freezer stays stocked with warm sourdough breads for January and February, plus fresh pasta for quick weeknight dinners. The best part is the convenience. Everything bakes from frozen in under 25 minutes, so it works even when I'm tired and the sun sets at 4:30 now. Dana's gluten free. She loves her Gluten free box. It's a huge win. She loves how it tastes and how easy it is. Wild Grain is just great. So there's nothing like having an artisan bakery in your freezer to chase away the winter chill and make your home smell amazing. Now is the best time to stay in and enjoy comforting homemade meals with Wild Grain. I highly recommend giving Wild Grain a try. Right now, Wild Grain is offering our listeners $30 off your first box plus free Croissants for Life when you go to wildgrain.comdailybeans to start your subscription today. That's $30 off your first box and free Croissants for Life. Just visit wildgrain.comdailybeans or you can use promo code dailybeans at checkout.