The Daily Beans: We Can Chill Energy Transfer (feat. Deepa Padmanabha) – Detailed Summary
Episode Information
- Title: We Can Chill Energy Transfer (feat. Deepa Padmanabha)
- Host/Author: MSW Media
- Release Date: December 23, 2024
- Description: In this episode, Allison Gill and Dana Goldberg delve into the ongoing legal battle between Greenpeace USA and Energy Transfer. Featuring an in-depth conversation with Deepa Padmanabha, Senior Legal Advisor at Greenpeace USA, the episode explores the strategic lawsuits aimed at undermining environmental advocacy and the broader implications for social justice movements.
1. Introduction to the Lawsuit Against Greenpeace USA
Allison Gill opens the episode expressing both excitement and frustration over the topic at hand. She introduces the central issue: a prolonged lawsuit filed by Energy Transfer against Greenpeace USA, which she asserts is designed solely to bankrupt the organization and stifle its advocacy efforts.
"We have a very long ongoing lawsuit against Greenpeace USA that is basically designed to bankrupt the organization and nothing more."
– Allison Gill [00:33]
2. Deepa Padmanabha on the Nature and History of the Lawsuit
Deepa Padmanabha provides context, explaining that the lawsuit against Greenpeace USA began in 2017 as part of a series of strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs). Initially filed as RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) lawsuits, these actions were intended to equate Greenpeace's advocacy work with organized crime.
"This narrative... is equivalent to work for organized crime."
– Deepa Padmanabha [03:20]
She emphasizes that while the RICO claims were dismissed in federal court in 2019, Energy Transfer persisted by re-filing similar cases under state law in North Dakota, where anti-SLAPP protections are absent.
3. Understanding SLAPPs and Their Impact on Advocacy
Allison Gill seeks to clarify what SLAPPs entail. Deepa Padmanabha explains that SLAPPs are not intended to win on their merits but to intimidate and silence activists through the threat of expensive litigation.
"These are lawsuits that are actually, actually not designed to win on their merits. They are designed to intimidate and to scare people and groups into silence."
– Deepa Padmanabha [05:56]
Such lawsuits have a chilling effect on free speech and collective action, making it difficult for organizations with limited resources to defend themselves against well-funded corporate adversaries.
4. The Current State Lawsuit and Its Allegations
The conversation shifts to the specifics of the current lawsuit in North Dakota. Deepa Padmanabha outlines the three primary allegations:
-
Defamation: Energy Transfer claims Greenpeace made false statements about the pipeline’s route and its impact on the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, alleging these statements caused millions in damages.
"Energy Transfer alleges that we made false statements that caused them millions of dollars in harm."
– Deepa Padmanabha [09:24] -
Tortious Interference: The lawsuit accuses Greenpeace of pressuring banks to withdraw financing from the pipeline project based on alleged falsehoods, leading to significant financial losses for Energy Transfer.
"Greenpeace lied to these banks... and we cost them hundreds of millions of dollars in damages."
– Deepa Padmanabha [10:15] -
Trespass and Collective Liability: The most concerning allegation is the imposition of collective liability, where Greenpeace could be held responsible for the actions of individual protesters, regardless of their involvement in unlawful activities.
"If you're engaged in a protest, you can be held accountable for whatever happens there."
– Deepa Padmanabha [11:07]
5. The Broader Implications for Social Movements
Allison Gill and Dana Goldberg discuss the potential ramifications if the lawsuit succeeds. They highlight the risk of setting a dangerous precedent where any peaceful protestor could be held liable for the actions of others, effectively criminalizing collective activism.
"If you wrote a peaceful protest, you could be considered liable for Heather Heyer's death."
– Dana Goldberg [13:33]
Deepa Padmanabha reinforces this concern, emphasizing that such legal tactics are part of a broader strategy to weaken and divide social justice movements, including indigenous and Black-led initiatives.
"We are seeing these attacks in indigenous, you know, in many movements."
– Deepa Padmanabha [13:33]
6. Defense Strategy and Movement Mobilization
The discussion transitions to Greenpeace USA's approach to combating the lawsuit. Deepa Padmanabha outlines a dual strategy:
-
Legal Defense: Preparing a robust legal case to challenge the meritless claims and protect Greenpeace’s rights in court.
"We have a very strong legal defense that's going to be in the courtroom."
– Deepa Padmanabha [16:42] -
Movement Building: Beyond the courtroom, Greenpeace aims to fortify the broader movement by raising public awareness, fostering solidarity among diverse groups, and exposing the oppressive tactics of corporate adversaries.
"Winning has to be much bigger than that. We need to make these lawsuits a losing tactic."
– Deepa Padmanabha [17:56]
7. The Importance of Public Support and Awareness
Allison Gill underscores the necessity of public involvement in countering SLAPPs. Deepa Padmanabha encourages listeners to engage by visiting Greenpeace’s dedicated website, signing open letters, and spreading awareness about the lawsuit.
"Visibility is a really critical part of slap suit."
– Deepa Padmanabha [27:28]
She highlights initiatives such as greenpeaceontrial.org and urges the audience to amplify the message through their personal networks.
8. The Intersection of Environmental Advocacy and Indigenous Rights
A significant portion of the episode addresses the intersectionality of environmental activism and indigenous sovereignty. Deepa Padmanabha recounts the history of the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL), emphasizing how the pipeline’s rerouting impacted the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s land and water resources.
"This narrative... is an absolute attack on indigenous sovereignty and indigenous leadership."
– Deepa Padmanabha [22:31]
She points out that Energy Transfer’s allegations not only misrepresent Greenpeace’s role but also attempt to delegitimize indigenous voices and their rightful resistance.
9. Potential Consequences of a Negative Court Ruling
The hosts and Deepa Padmanabha discuss the dire outcomes if Energy Transfer prevails in court. Such a ruling could embolden other corporations to employ similar tactics against various advocacy groups, leading to a systemic erosion of free speech and collective action rights.
"If you go through what the company went through, you don't want to embolden these organizations."
– Deepa Padmanabha [26:00]
They draw parallels to other sectors facing similar legal pressures, including media organizations and left-leaning nonprofits, highlighting a broader pattern of suppressive legal strategies.
10. Call to Action: Supporting Greenpeace USA and Protecting Free Speech
To conclude, Deepa Padmanabha reiterates the importance of collective action in resisting SLAPPs. She outlines actionable steps for listeners to support Greenpeace USA, such as signing petitions, sharing information, and participating in community activism.
"Show that we will not be silenced."
– Deepa Padmanabha [28:30]
Allison Gill emphasizes the critical role of public support in ensuring that Greenpeace and similar organizations can continue their advocacy without fear of debilitating legal reprisals.
Conclusion
In this episode of The Daily Beans, Allison Gill and Dana Goldberg, alongside guest Deepa Padmanabha, shed light on the insidious use of strategic lawsuits to undermine environmental and social justice movements. The conversation not only details the specific legal challenges faced by Greenpeace USA but also explores the broader implications for collective activism and free speech. By understanding these tactics and mobilizing public support, listeners are empowered to defend the rights to protest and advocate for a more just and sustainable world.