Why Cornered Trump Is Turning On His Own Justices

Summary

Podcast Summary: The Daily Beast Podcast

Episode: "Why Cornered Trump Is Turning On His Own Justices"

Host: Joanna Coles
Guest: Michael Wolff
Release Date: February 22, 2026

---

Overview

This episode explores Donald Trump’s recent, striking attacks on Supreme Court justices—some of whom he personally appointed—following a legal setback over his proposed universal tariffs. Joanna Coles and Michael Wolff delve into Trump’s unique political style, his psychology under pressure, the performative and unpredictable nature of his leadership, and what his loyalty and dominance obsession means for both policy and political culture. They also touch on the broader implications for the Democratic opposition, shifting norms around masculinity and DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion) in American society, the symbolism behind Trump-era political iconography, and recent developments in prominent scandals involving Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Inside Trump’s Mind and Method (02:09–05:00)

• Trump’s Political Uniqueness:
  Michael Wolff emphasizes that Trump’s governance style is profoundly different from any other American president, characterized as a “government of one.” Policy goals and political realities are secondary to his personal grievances and thirst for dominance.

  • Quote:
    “What he gets up in the morning, thinking, wanting, or having seen on television in the last number of minutes…that’s what matters.” — Michael Wolff (02:39)

• Theatricality of Defeat:
  Trump’s key strength is his ability to turn humiliating defeats—such as the Supreme Court’s decision against him—into moments of personal narrative and confrontation that energize his base.

  • Quote:
    “His magic is to turn that defeat into victory…this will ultimately redound to the legend of Donald Trump rather than to a policy defeat.” — Michael Wolff (07:20)

2. Attacking His Own Justices and Politicizing the Court (05:32–12:24)

• Extended Target List:
  Trump publicly denounces not only liberal Supreme Court justices but also “his own” appointees (Gorsuch, Barrett), labeling them “unpatriotic fools and lapdogs.”

  • Quote (Trump):
    “They're very unpatriotic and disloyal to our Constitution…swayed by foreign interests and a political movement that is far smaller than people would ever think.” (06:10)

• Historical Context:
  Wolff draws a distinction with the politicization of the Court in the past (e.g., the Warren Court) and stresses the newness of Trump targeting his own appointments.

  • “This is his court, theoretically…one of his chief accomplishments…But that doesn’t matter. He first has no loyalty to anyone.” — Michael Wolff (12:24)

3. The Trump Effect: Riveting, Unpredictable Politics (04:30–11:27)

• Performance vs. Policy:
  Trump’s appeal comes not from policy or legislative agendas but from sheer spectacle; Democrats are described as “boring” and “cautious,” ill-equipped to counter Trump’s disruptiveness.

  • “Reduce the political world to boring. Can’t stop watching. What does that get you? Well, gets you Donald Trump.” — Michael Wolff (10:54)

• State of the Union Anticipation:
  Both hosts predict that Trump will use the upcoming State of the Union as another platform for theatrics, perhaps publicly shaming SCOTUS justices, especially Chief Justice Roberts.

  • “He’ll come up with nicknames… for Amy Coney Barrett, for Neil Gorsuch, the first justice that he appointed.” — Joanna Coles (08:07)

4. Democratic Dilemma & Voters as Audience (14:22–16:32)

• Democrats as Traditionalists:
  The show critiques Democratic politicians’ inability to match Trump’s performative energy, continuing to view “voters as voters instead of voters as an audience.”
  • Quote:
    “What does Trump understand? Voters are an audience…they respond to the guy on the stage.” — Michael Wolff (15:56)

5. Foreign Policy Chaos & Domestic Deflection (16:32–20:07)

• Tariff Defeat and Military Escalations:
  The hosts speculate that, cornered by the tariff ruling, Trump may seek “face-saving” moves elsewhere, including a “limited action” in Iran—although he himself is unpredictable.
  • Quote:
    “He has no idea [what will happen].” — (Co-host, 17:17) “He’s already launched a face saving campaign…he’s in his element here: I don’t need you, I don’t listen to you, you’re not the boss of me.” — Michael Wolff (19:49)

6. Shifting Masculinity & Decline of DEI (21:11–27:32)

• Testosterone Politics:
  The podcast shifts to a discussion of performative masculinity, referencing viral “bro” videos from figures like RFK Jr. and Pete Hegseth, alongside a broader backlash in corporate America against DEI initiatives.

  • Quote:
    “The men are out of control…all the things men thought they couldn’t say about women, or couldn’t say about anything, they can now say what they like.” — Joanna Coles (24:54)
    “It’s a celebration of a very classic masculinity, possibly the toxic masculinity we wanted to move on from.” — Joanna Coles (26:34)

• Epstein Files & Hollywood Fallout:
  Connection is drawn to recent Epstein-related revelations, including fireable emails from Hollywood agency head Casey Wasserman and broader cultural implications.

7. The Mystery of Nancy Guthrie (31:04–33:59)

• National Distraction:
  Brief recounting of the disappearance of Savannah Guthrie’s mother, notable as a case that has gripped the nation but seen no progress, despite high-level FBI attention.
  • “It just becomes literally a black hole mystery…not a mystery that’s being solved.” — Michael Wolff (32:20)

8. Trump Banners and Cult of Personality (34:14–39:52)

• Political Iconography:
  Discussion of massive pro-Trump banners being erected on government buildings—likened to 1930s Germany, but also to Trump’s own real estate branding and “The Apprentice” billboards.
  • Quote:
    “Every government building is going to be required to have a Trump banner…huge enough to dwarf huge buildings.” — Michael Wolff (34:14) “It's about dominance again. Dominance, dominance, dominance…Then it’s about a cult of personality, and then it’s about speaking to the fan base.” — Michael Wolff (38:23, 38:30, 38:39)

9. Trump’s Speech Style, Narrative Fabrication, and Use of Anecdotes (41:11–45:49)

• Catskills Comedy as Governance:
  Trump is described as a “tummler” or vaudeville act—deriving energy from off-the-cuff, often fabricated stories.

  • Memorable Moment:
    Trump’s rambling anecdote about a steelworker wanting to “kiss” him—dismissed by Wolff as pure fiction.
    • “The fact that these people don’t exist is immaterial to him.” — Michael Wolff (44:28)

• Melania-Documentary Reference:
  The hosts joke about Melania underscoring her lack of romantic connection to Trump via her own documentary.

10. The Bond of Friendship, Epstein & Maxwell (46:06–63:44)

• Epstein’s Social Skills and Controversy:
  Extensive reflection on the nature of loyalty and transactional friendships, the messy human relationships at the heart of the Epstein scandal, and Ghislaine Maxwell’s unique, seductively disruptive role.

  • “Virtually everybody who was friends with Jeffrey Epstein has now said, ‘I wish I had never been’…But the answer, the true answer…is they spent time with him because he was their friend.” — Michael Wolff (47:54)
  • “She was a classic seductress…a serious disruptor because of this willingness and ability to seduce.” — Michael Wolff (53:57)

• Father Figures and Agency:
  The hosts debate the influence of Robert Maxwell (Ghislaine’s father) versus personal agency and responsibility for one’s choices in life.

• Sibling Oddities:
  Wolff recounts his own brush with the Maxwell siblings’ “internet grifting” (63:17) as an aside on family dynamics.

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• On Trump's Emotional Volatility:
  “He first has no loyalty to Anyone and anybody who crosses him, disses him. There is no compromise. There is no…he swallows nothing.” — Michael Wolff (12:24)

• On State of the Union Anticipation:
  “Nobody falls asleep during Donald Trump’s State of the Unions.” — Michael Wolff (13:59)

• On Democratic Strategy:
  “They continue to think of voters as voters instead of voters as an audience…they respond to the guy on the stage.” — Michael Wolff (15:56)

• On the Limits of “Normal” Politics in the Trump Age:
  “Politics is boring. Donald Trump is electric, is crazy, is ridiculous, but he is not boring…suddenly you’ve taken those old portraits in which the people look dead into this…gigantic portrait, which looks like…the monster has come to earth.” — Michael Wolff (39:52)

---

Segment Timestamps

• Trump’s psychology and the “government of one”: 02:09–05:00
• His attacks on Supreme Court justices: 05:32–12:24
• Politics as spectacle / Trump’s unpredictability: 10:54–16:32
• Face-saving over tariffs and threats of Iran action: 16:32–20:07
• Masculinity politics, DEI, and the Epstein effect: 21:11–27:32
• Nancy Guthrie disappearance: 31:04–33:59
• Pro-Trump banners and cult of personality: 34:14–39:52
• Trump’s performative speechmaking and anecdotes: 41:11–45:49
• Epstein, Maxwell, and transactional friendship: 46:06–63:44

---

Tone and Style

The episode is raucous, witty, and pointed—full of sardonic asides, personal anecdotes, and a shared sense between Coles and Wolff that the normal rules of American politics have been upended. They combine energetic banter with deeply informed analysis, moving swiftly between headlines and inside-baseball observations.

---

Takeaway

This episode offers a lively, critical, and sometimes darkly humorous look at a political culture in the Trump era that blurs the line between governance, personal spectacle, and show business. Trump’s refusal to accept loyalty from even his own appointees, his predilection for confrontation, and his ability to dominate the news cycle—combined with the unusual cast of characters in his orbit—set the stage for a continually unpredictable and performative campaign. The struggle for Democratic opponents and the rise of “toxic masculinity” symbolism in public life echo the episode’s central theme: in the politics of today, attention—no matter how divisive or disruptive—often trumps everything else.

Transcript

[Host]

Fox News is now streaming live on Fox 1. When news breaks, we don't just report it.

[Michael Wolff]

We go beyond the headlines to get the full story.

[Host]

Get live coverage in depth, analysis and

[Michael Wolff]

perspectives from the voices you trust all in one place. Whether you're at home or on the go. Stay connected to the stories shaping our world stream.

[Host]

Fox News on Fox 1 download today,

[Michael Wolff]

it will no longer be about about the Supreme Court basically humiliating him. It will then be about about his theatrics in responding to this. When you see this guy, it is, he wears it all on his sleeve. I mean, he is like watching, it

[Co-host]

was like watching a child yesterday for years. And he was like, absolutely no. And it was like, well, I'm going to do tariffs anyway, 10% on all of them. I mean, it absolutely is the. The mad queen. Off with their heads. Off with their heads.

[Michael Wolff]

Reduce the political world to boring. Can't stop watching. What does that get you? Well, gets you. Donald Trump.

[Co-host]

Michael. Joanna, where are we going? It's Saturday morning. Where are we going?

[Michael Wolff]

Michael, you know, we're going inside Trump's head.

[Co-host]

And can we remind people, do we

[Michael Wolff]

feel like being inside Trump's head on this sunny day in the Hamptons? I don't know.

[Co-host]

Well, we're expecting, I think, somewhere between 10 and 12 inches of snow this afternoon, which fills me with a little trepidation because I'm supposed to be going on a jaunt upstate and but I don't feel 100% steady as yet, so I'm just debating what to do.

[Michael Wolff]

You're going on a jaunt with your new hip?

[Co-host]

I'm going on a daunt with my new hip, et cetera. I don't think my new hip wants to fight through 10 inches of snow. So we're going to take it under advisement, as they say. But for new people who haven't joined us on this podcast before, do you want to give them a suggestion of what they are in?

[Michael Wolff]

No, I do, because it's important and I think continue to believe we do something that is unique. People cover the Trump administration from outside. They cover the Trump administration, frankly, as though despite all the evidence, it is a normal political situation. And it isn't. And it isn't because it actually doesn't work from the outside. In order to understand what is going on at this moment in political time, you have to understand what goes on in Donald Trump's head, because nothing else matters. I mean, it doesn't matter. The policy goals don't matter. Political reality doesn't matter. The only Thing that matters is what he gets up in the morning, thinking, wanting or having seen on television in the last number of minutes. So it is again, as we have said, often a government of one. He doesn't listen to anyone. He doesn't really have advisors, he doesn't take advice. What he does, it is all reflexive. Who he hates, who he wants revenge on, and most of all how he wants to project his own dominance.

[Co-host]

And I think, I would say that what I find so intriguing and fascinating and unlookable away from is just the way that he says things that other politicians have never said. And we were talking earlier, before we hopped on to record today, and we were talking about the opacity of most politicians and how you don't actually know what they think because they're saying what they think people want to hear. And of course, Donald Trump doesn't do that. And I find myself now, and we'll go into the SCOTUS of it all and the decision yesterday, today to not allow him to impose his tariffs and we'll go into his reaction. But I now find myself on the edge of my seat for the State of the Union address on Tuesday. Not words that would ever have come out of my mouth.

[Michael Wolff]

You know, I mean, we had an exchange, an off camera exchange or for those on audio, off. What would it be off audio?

[Co-host]

Well, we were just talking. We were talking as friends.

[Michael Wolff]

Just, just talking and, and response, which was a perfectly understandable one, is again that he's such an embarrassment, he's a moron when he talks, which is certainly, absolutely, astoundingly true, except for the fact that it's incredibly effective. You cannot take your eyes off him. And his response after, when he came out yesterday to deride the Supreme Court with all manner of insults, again, he was absolutely moronic, but absolutely riveting.

[Co-host]

Well, and as you make the point, it's as much about who he hates and who he wants retribution on that makes his policy. And I mean, yesterday he came out and he called the justices who ruled against him. So the three Democratic justices, the women who are appointed by Biden and Obama, but also Neil Gorsuch and Amy Comey

[Michael Wolff]

Barrett, who he and anyone who votes against him.

[Co-host]

And yeah, okay, but he specifically called, and this is new territory, the, the justices unpatriotic fools and lap dogs. And I think actually in an effort to be even more effective, we've got the clip here.

[Host]

They're very unpatriotic and disloyal to our Constitution. It's my opinion that the Court has been swayed by foreign interests and a political movement that is far smaller than people would ever think.

[Co-host]

I can't stop laughing.

[Michael Wolff]

We could just do the gestures on this because it's so rudimentary that you could just. But. But again, who would say such things? And you don't know the next thing he's going to say, so you're kind of glued to it. But the other, in the broader context, handed a defeat that galvanizes him. His magic is to turn that defeat into victory. So, I mean, let's remember the 2024 campaign. He's indicted four times. These are criminal indictments. This is. His life is at stake. His freedom is at stake. And does he bow to that at all? No, it's all confrontation. It does. Throughout the campaign, there were really no campaign issues except to him, the prosecutors, the judges, and anyone who would try to, anyone who would oppose him in court. This became the entire narrative of the campaign. This will. Now, in this election year, this tariff things, the court will become the enemy. He will rise to this occasion. This will. And this will ultimately redound to the legend of Donald Trump rather than to a policy defeat.

[Co-host]

Well, can you imagine being Chief Justice John Roberts yesterday morning waking up and saying to Mrs. Roberts, well, today is the day. And, you know, this is a man who oversaw giving the president immunity and allowing Donald Trump to think that he was literally above the law. And finally, SCOTUS has pushed back John Roberts. The Chief justice wrote the opinion. I cannot imagine a worse day for the poor man. And then, of course, the reason I'm on the edge of my seat about State of the Union, which is on Tuesday, is that at last year's State of the Union, Donald Trump caused much sturm and drag when he walked past Roberts. He shook his hand, he said thank you. He sort of murmured into his ear, and everybody was like, oh, my goodness. Oh, my goodness. You know, the two of them are working together. There was so much online drama about it. And now, of course, he's got a new enemy in John Roberts. And I'm sure during his speech, he'll go after them, right? He'll come up with nicknames for Amy Coney Barrett. He'll come up with nicknames for Neil Gorsuch, the first justice that he appointed.

[Michael Wolff]

The important point is that it will not be. It will no longer be about. It will no longer be about the Supreme Court basically humiliating him. It will then be about. About his theatrics in responding to this and his emotion and his. And it's a It's incredibly effective. You what?

[Host]

You.

[Michael Wolff]

When you see this guy, it is. He wears it all on his sleeve. I mean, he is.

[Co-host]

It was like watching a child. Yes. For years. And he was like, absolutely. No. And it was like, well, I'm gonna do tariffs anyway. 10% on all of them. I mean, it absolutely is. The mad queen from Alice Inland. Off with their heads. Off with their heads. I mean, it's extraordinary how it's playing out and nobody knows. And if you're a business, incredibly difficult to know how to play. There's very difficult to organize anything in the world.

[Michael Wolff]

It's incredibly difficult. If you're a Democrat, how do you counter this? I mean, and all of these Democrats have spent their whole life in politics, know that caution is their. The chief virtue of. Of a political life and a political career, that you want that every word you say, you want to hone, craft.

[Co-host]

And here is a man who doesn't hone anything. He doesn't craft anything. I want to go onto the Board of Peace a bit later in the show. And also we want to talk about the homoerotic videos that are now spinning out of the Cabinet with alarming frequency.

[Michael Wolff]

But just let's make the distinct. The distinction between boring and can't stop watching. So take that out of the realm of policy. Forget that. Which is. The Democrats are always saying, no, no, no, you can't forget that. It's policy. Policy. But really, put that aside and just think of those two things. Reduce the political world to boring. Can't stop watching. What does that get you? Well, gets you Donald Trump.

[Co-host]

It gets you Donald Trump. It gets all of us. Donald Trump. It gets the world. Donald Trump. We're all saddled with this, with this man. But the fools and lapdogs description of the justices is a new. Well, it's just new territory. And to set them up like this really politicises them in a way that we haven't seen for a long time.

[Michael Wolff]

I'm trying to think if that is true, and it's not exactly true, because the court, during the 1960s, the Warren Court, the court was highly politicized under nearly constant attacks, constant calls for impeachment and resignation. So this is a little different, actually, it's a lot different because this is his court, theoretically. I mean, this is a court which

[Co-host]

has six conservative judges.

[Michael Wolff]

Yeah. I mean, this is one of his chief accomplishments, theoretically, to have stacked the court in the way he has. But that doesn't matter. This is typical, a typical Trump thing. He first has no loyalty to Anyone and anybody who crosses him, disses him. There is no compromise. There is no. Donald Trump is not saying, yeah, okay, I got a, I got a, you know, these guys have been pretty good to me and I'm in a pretty good place on this. And they've basically said I can do anything I want whenever I want. And I, nobody can do anything to me. But, and, and so maybe I should swallow this. No, he swallows nothing.

[Co-host]

I'm sure that John Roberts as a child borrowed his mother's cape and swished around the living room going, I'm going to be Chief justice one day. Be careful what you wish for. He had no idea when W appointed him that one day he would be doing battle with Donald Trump. And in the court of television and entertainment, Donald Trump would win anyway. I can't wait for the State of the Union. Is he going to walk past them? I mean, he actually said, I don't care if they're invited or not. I could care less if they come again. You know, of course they're supposed to be there, sitting there on the row. We famously watched Ruth Bader Ginsburg falling asleep at the State of the Union. And why wouldn't she? Because they're frequently boring. But this is going to be electrifying, I think on Tuesday anyway. That's my prediction.

[Michael Wolff]

But, and a reasonable prediction is that nobody falls asleep during Donald Trump's State of the Unions and they go on for longer. They break precedent almost in every occasion. But you don't know what he will say.

[Co-host]

You don't know what he's going to say. He doesn't know. Exactly.

[Michael Wolff]

So this is, but again, it's so interesting to me that the Democrats are helpless in the face of this and cannot come to terms with what this is and how to meet this head on. And I can't help them because I don't know what you would do.

[Co-host]

I think on this one you sit it out because there will be many more things before the run ups of the election.

[Michael Wolff]

Well, it's not just this. It's his entire political frame of operation which the Democrats don't know how to, how to counter. I mean, Newsom now has, he's trying to create social media, memes, et cetera, et cetera, but it's still, it's weak. So is there a Democratic politician? And I'm just trying to think through the cast of characters who could possibly be as performative as Donald Trump.

[Co-host]

Well, and that may not be what people want. People may not want someone as performative. You know, they may just want to return to something that feels a little bit.

[Michael Wolff]

No, no, people just say they want that.

[Co-host]

Well, they, they returned to Biden after. They returned to Biden after Trump won.

[Michael Wolff]

Yeah, well, that lasted what, 10 minutes before, before he was, people are like,

[Co-host]

we want him back.

[Michael Wolff]

He was completely in the doghouse. Yes, we want him back because that guy, we don't even. Not guy, he's just white noise. So if you think of, you know, and this is a problem with the Democrats, of course, they continue to think of voters as voters instead of voters as an audience. What does Trump understand? Voters are an audience and they respond to the same things that an audience responds to, which is not policy and it's not a legislative agenda. What it is is they respond to the guy on the stage.

[Co-host]

Well, and the thing that we know that Donald Trump also responds to is he doesn't like being backed into a corner, which he has been with the tariffs, although he's now said that he's going to impose 10% tariffs on absolutely everybody. But meanwhile, we have a buildup of troops in the Middle east, the biggest buildup since 2003 in the invasion of Iraq. Is he going to divert from what was a loss for him with the tariffs and bomb Ira, Is he going to keep threatening Iran? Is he going to try and do an in and out as he did in Venezuela or as he did in, in the summer? What is, what do you think is likely to happen here?

[Michael Wolff]

I assume these are rhetorical questions because we have no idea and.

[Co-host]

Well, he has no idea.

[Michael Wolff]

He has no idea.

[Co-host]

He has no idea.

[Michael Wolff]

Exactly.

[Co-host]

I mean, I'm interested to sort of game it up.

[Michael Wolff]

Okay. The status wise of where we are is now he is talking about a, a limited incursion or a limited action of some sorts. In other words, and as we talked about this the other day, you know, he's in a, in a pickle. You know, if he doesn't do something, he looks weak. Well, also, we have all that we have. We have the entire United States military amassed to do something. So he looks weak, but he's also understands and people keep telling him about how complicated it is to in fact do something. And A, he doesn't want to listen to the details of why it's complicated, and B, he certainly doesn't want to deal with a sudden complicated situation which would take over everybody's mind share instead of him being everybody's. Everybody's mind share and the whole idea, actually. And virtually no one in the world can make the prediction of what happens if they in fact get rid of this regime?

[Co-host]

Right.

[Michael Wolff]

Which may well be the result.

[Co-host]

Right. And we should remind people he encouraged people to keep protesting in the streets last month that help was on its way and his goal is to stop Iran becoming a serious nuclear power.

[Michael Wolff]

Well, he doesn't really know what his goal is. The goal was first to protect the protesters. Okay. Well that goal fell by the wayside and they. And 7,000 or 8,000 or 10,000 or nobody knows how many thousands were shot in the streets. So that goal went away. Now the goal is about their nuclear capacity. And. Oh, I, you know, I, I mean, so it is interesting, but it does would seem that right now he is on the verge of doing some face saving thing that will not advance the ball in either direction.

[Co-host]

Well, and, and if he's doing a face saving thing over the tariffs, whether or not he overextends a decision in.

[Michael Wolff]

I think the face saving thing is over Iran.

[Co-host]

Well, there are two face saving things. I think there's the tariffs because that was humiliating.

[Michael Wolff]

Well, the, that he's already, he's already launched a face saving campaign. They're the enemy. They're wrong. I'm going to put tariffs on anyway. I mean, he's in his element here. Which is, which is I don't need you. I don't listen to you. You don't. You're not the boss of me.

[Co-host]

Starting a business can seem like a daunting task unless you have a partner like Shopify. They have the tools you need to start and grow your business. From designing a website to marketing to selling and beyond. Shopify can help with everything you need. There's a reason millions of companies like Mattel, Heinz and Allbirds continue to trust and use them. With Shopify on your side, turn your big business idea into sign up for your $1 per month [e-mail] specialoffer. You are not the boss of me. That's the exact energy that he was giving yesterday when he responded in that strangely lit White House press room too. Which was odd with poor Howard Lutnick standing there, solemn and silent throughout. Never once called upon as Commerce Secretary. Never once called upon. Anyway, we have no idea if he's gonna go into Iran. He doesn't know if he's going to go into Iran. The Epstein secretary. Yeah, that's a good description. And obviously we'll get into the Epstein of it all. Do we want to discuss the homoerotic videos coming out of the cabinet? I think we might do because you're talking about how are the Democrats gonna face 2028? You have always maintained that RFK Jr. Is gonna run as president in 2028, obviously for the Republicans. And he released a video with Kid Rock this week in the sauna. Not to be outdone, the next day, Pete released a video talking about how it was very important to keep your butt down when you were trying to bench press. I think that's the term bench press. £350. And the thing that was so bizarre to me, and perhaps you can explain this. 315. Okay, 315 sounds like 350 if you say it quickly, which I think he did. You've got to keep your butt down.

[Michael Wolff]

No, and it's this other thing that the other signal that they're very clearly sending. That's a bro message.

[Co-host]

It's protein powders, right? And creatine and all that stuff that they take. Even though RFK Jr says, Just eat real food and smother yourself in beef tallow. Anyway, we saw him smothered in beef tallow, cycling mysteriously on a stationary bike, cycling to nowhere.

[Michael Wolff]

Why does he work out in tight blue jeans?

[Co-host]

Because he thinks it's attractive and women will like him even more. And the blue goes with his eyes.

[Michael Wolff]

Have you ever seen anyone work out in tight blue jeans?

[Co-host]

No, but I have a friend who lives in Bedford slash Mount Kisco who says that when RFK lived up, there

[Michael Wolff]

isn't one or the other Bedford or Mount Kid.

[Co-host]

They're sort of next to each other. And the point of the story is,

[Michael Wolff]

in other words, this person lives on Mount.

[Co-host]

Oh, my God. I cannot get a word in edgeways. I can't get a word in edgeways.

[Michael Wolff]

I want you to think that he lives in Bedford.

[Co-host]

No, I actually think it's the other way around. But the point of the story is there are gyms in Both Bedford and Mount Kisco where I am told RFK Jr was parading around the gym to your point, in jeans with no shirt on. And I don't think it was a shirtless environment as you can imagine up there in those slightly prissy, those prissy upstate towns. Anyway, you've had so much coffee this morning, I'm struggling to get a word in edgeways. But I was curious about Pete Hegseth. He's lying there, he's bench pressing £315. And the person who's spotting him is his 15 year old son Gunnar, who looks to be a young 15. And he sort of of desperately looking like, you know, I mean, first of all, who would trust their teenage son in a moment like this where you might end up dropping £315 on your own body? Who would trust a teenager to spot you? You know, they're not thinking about you, they're thinking about anything else but what's going on in front of you. Poor Gunner. And then at one point, Gunner reaches out because it looks like his father is going to be unable to lift the full thing. And Peter Hexlister just shouts at him, he just reams him out. He's like, get off. Get off like this. And you're like, you're humiliating your teenage son and then you're distributing this on video. It was absurd.

[Michael Wolff]

So what's the goal here?

[Co-host]

Is the message that masculinity is back? I mean, every. The other thing I keep hearing from my senior female friends in big companies is that nobody cares about DEI anymore. We saw that Goldman Sachs put out a statement saying they were jettisoned listening dei. And I have a friend who was actually called by her boss, a very significant figure in the finance world, who said she has been working on another project and he said, I need you to come and talk to the men. The men are out of control. And there is this sense in which

[Michael Wolff]

I think that the men are out of control in their broness or.

[Co-host]

Yeah, in their broness, in the way they're talking again, that all the things that men thought they couldn't say about women or couldn't say about anything, they can now say what they like. The HR department no longer matters.

[Michael Wolff]

So the Jeffrey Epstein emails have become inspiring rather than whatever the opposite is.

[Co-host]

Yeah. Which is odd because for many people they've become fireable offenses. And we can talk about Casey Wasserman and what's going on in Hollywood there. And obviously Casey Wasserman started the Wasserman Agency. He's the grandson of Lew Wasserman, Hollywood legend and perhaps more importantly, he's actually chair of the 2028 LA Olympics, under enormous pressure to resign that role because he was friendly with Epstein and had a series of racy emails with Ghislaine Maxwell at one of which he imagined her in tight leather outfit.

[Michael Wolff]

Just, just note these emails were from almost 25 years ago.

[Co-host]

Yeah, yeah, I am, I am noting that before people understood the scale of what Epstein was up to. And it's not illegal to send an email to someone saying that you'd like to imagine them in black leather. But what I am hearing from my senior females out in the workforce is that DEI is out of the window Nobody really cares what women think anymore. And it's to your point about why are people putting out these videos? It seems to be a celebration of a very classic masculinity, possibly the toxic masculinity that I totally agree with. We wanted to move on from.

[Michael Wolff]

But I think it's an interesting moment that, that occ. Exactly. Simultaneously with the Jeffrey Epstein moment, because the Jeffrey Epstein of it all is essentially to have created a incredibly toxic environment in which women are not only of little consequence, but you, you can do. Do with what you want with them.

[Co-host]

And, and there will be no consequences.

[Michael Wolff]

Exactly. And, and this is, this is what I mean. People are losing their jobs all over the place because of.

[Co-host]

Not Peter, a longevity expert.

[Michael Wolff]

So, but so side by side, these two, these two contradictory forces are, are on the loose. Interesting.

[Co-host]

Yeah, yeah, it is interesting. And it's the Trump government who. Or it's the Trump administration that is really pushing this sort of masculinity. I happened to drop by Dan Bongino's podcast yesterday. You remember that? Dan Bongino was.

[Michael Wolff]

I thought you were just gonna say you happened to drop by his office. I thought, well, no, no, no.

[Co-host]

I mean I just dropped by it. I dropped by him on Rumble or wherever, whatever distribution platform he's on and he had an interview with Cash Patel on. So I thought, oh, this will be interesting. I'm curious to know what the two of them are going to talk about because obviously the two of them, before they entered the administration as the number one and the number two of the FBI, were demanding the release of the Epstein files and kept going on about the conspiracy of the Epstein files. And you will be surprised or perhaps not surprised to know that in the 20 minute interview that they did, they didn't mention Epstein once. And actually I was encouraged by the fact that all the comments were like, guys, guys, why aren't you talking about Epstein? Instead they talked about Antifa and no mention of Nancy Guthrie. No mention whatsoever. So Kash Patel has time to give to his old friend doing a pointless suck upy podcast with Dan Bongino where he talks about the brilliance of Donald Trump. The brilliance of Donald Trump, but him

[Michael Wolff]

allowing us to work, especially after early on the successes of Viper, Operation Viper, the violent crime operation in Tennessee. He saw the results and said, guys, we got to expand this nationwide. There's no reason we can't replicate this in cities across the country. I think you just hit upon the brilliance of true leadership in what President Trump said to you and I. He said, go reduce violent Crime, go defend the homeland, stop children from overdosing and let's protect our children.

[Co-host]

Online doesn't mention Nancy Guthrie once who has been missing now for three weeks. For three weeks, an 80 year old woman has disappeared and the FBI can't find her. Meanwhile, Kash Patel has time to give to Dan Bongino. As Dan Bongino promotes his coffee powders and whatever else he's promoting. It was a shocking display.

[Michael Wolff]

I'm shocked that you're shocked.

[Co-host]

I guess I shouldn't have been shocked.

[Michael Wolff]

I mean, look, we know who these two guys are. Again, what you're trying to do is normalize them.

[Co-host]

I'm trying to normalize them and I shouldn't be doing that. You're quite right.

[Michael Wolff]

Give them some credit as professionals in their job or people who ought to be professionals in their job when they are not. Professionals by every evidence don't have the capacity to be professionals. Probably not the interest to be professionals either. And are and are doing. Who knows what they're doing there. They're just there to not create any friction between themselves and Donald Trump.

[Co-host]

I was wondering if perhaps Donald Trump had been back channeling to Kash Patel. You've got to sort out this Nancy Guthrie story because it's just a remarkable story and as you know, it's completely gripped the nation. And for those, and we have a lot of listeners abroad in Europe and in Australia. For those who haven't been following it

[Michael Wolff]

actually, and this is something I don't know. Has Trump been asked directly about this?

[Co-host]

Yes, and he said that they are going to bring in the death penalty for whoever did this.

[Michael Wolff]

The death penalty?

[Co-host]

Yeah. He's been, you know, super supportive of them trying to find Nancy Guthrie. And we should just say for people abroad who haven't been following the story, this is a story that's swallowed America for the last couple of weeks. It's the disappearance of the mother of Savannah Guthrie, who's a much beloved presenter of morning television. Anyway, her mother, who lives in Arizona has disappeared. There doesn't appear to have been a ransom note or there've been several, but it's unclear if any of them were real. Anyway, it's strange to say other than

[Michael Wolff]

a ring video, there's appears to be no evidence.

[Co-host]

Yes. And why don't you describe the ring video? Because it's really haunted.

[Michael Wolff]

Yeah, I mean, it's just somebody in a mask of some sort. I mean, you don't see very much. It doesn't offer very much. Just it would be haunting if someone approached your Ring video in a mask.

[Co-host]

Well, and a mask and gloves. Clearly doing something untoward. It looks utterly premeditated. The whole thing is like a scene from a horror movie.

[Michael Wolff]

It is, but the interesting thing about this is that it doesn't go beyond that. I mean, we know nothing more. This story has not advanced beyond that. That. So it just becomes literally a black hole mystery. And not a mystery. Clearly, that's being solved.

[Co-host]

Well, and certainly not being solved by the head of the FBI.

[Michael Wolff]

Well, it appears to be being solved by nobody. Or certainly, certainly. I mean, maybe somebody knows things that we don't know and they're performing in a very professional manner. But it certainly does not seem that way.

[Host]

Way.

[Co-host]

Well, it just seemed a mystery to me that would have time to appear on Dan Bongino's video when there are other more urgent things for him to do.

[Michael Wolff]

Three weeks is a, this is, I mean, I mean, it's a, I mean, this is obviously a tragedy of great proportions, and the likelihood is that this is not going to end.

[Co-host]

Well, no, it really doesn't look as if it is going to, although we have, frankly, we have no idea. But it's a terrible, terrible story. But I've watched the Dan Bonjino podcast, so nobody listening or watching this podcast needs to. Including you, Michael. But you wouldn't even know where to find Rumble.

[Michael Wolff]

No. Well, you sent me a little clip, I thought, and it confirmed, I mean, the fact these people are so stupid. It, I mean, I, I, I mean, I, I. You just hit your head again and again. My God.

[Co-host]

Well, and the idea that the two of them are running the FBI is really shocking. Anyway, what do we think about the banners? The very sort of 1930s Germany banners that Trump is erecting of himself everywhere.

[Michael Wolff]

Every government building is going to be required to have a Trump, Trump banner. And these are, I mean, if you haven't seen these banners, these are huge banners. They're huge enough to dwarf huge buildings.

[Co-host]

Yeah. The one outside the Justice Department is perhaps the most egregious, the sort of signaling. This is Trump's Justice Department.

[Michael Wolff]

Let's speculate on where these come from. Does Donald Trump say, hey, I went by that building this morning and we could put a really big, big picture of me on the building? Probably does that. Is that how the message gets sent? Or are the people at the Justice Department and every other building so, so much the toadies that they figure, hey, hey, hey, this is a good idea. Well, we should, we should actually forget Nancy Guthrie. This is a good idea. Let's put up a building size banner of the President.

[Co-host]

In fact, the only person I know who's had a banner or an image as big as that is you, when you were projected on the side of Windsor Castle with that video of Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump. So maybe that's where he got the video. Maybe that's where he got the idea from.

[Michael Wolff]

That was so fleeting video. It just, you know, it's,

[Co-host]

I wonder if the idea, somehow the kernel of the idea came from that because he liked the idea of himself on the side of Windsor Castle. And then he thought, or maybe he's just been looking at imagery of Nazi Germany and thought, hey, those banners are a good idea.

[Michael Wolff]

I don't know. I mean, let's think. Does it come from him? Does it come from Susie Wiles thinking, oh God, you know, he's in a bad mood. This will make him, you know, we'll get a couple of hours respite if we put up some ban.

[Co-host]

Well, can't you, can't you ask your person in the White House next week and we get some sort of. We should investigate this. Cause it's super interesting. And there was that moment during one of the cabinet meetings where he briefly stayed a week awake. And we haven't actually discussed the possibility of whether or not he could fall asleep in his own State of the Union.

[Michael Wolff]

But there's another question, which is we're making fun of the, this, these, these banners, but is there a political point with these banners? Does he get something from these banners? This imposition, I mean, we're talking about Nazi Germany dismissively, but that was, you know, for a while.

[Co-host]

Well, I didn't mean it dismissively, I meant it just symbolically.

[Michael Wolff]

So does this hap. Does putting up your, your, your face anywhere you can put it up and putting your name anywhere you can, can put on any where on any building you can put it on. What does this accomplish? Certainly for a good part of the country, it just contributes to turning everybody off. To Donald Trump more than everybody turning people off, the revulsion is clear. But to the other part of the country, do they look at this Donald Trump's immense face on these buildings, and not particularly, by the way, an attractive face. And think, what do they think? Is there an outpouring of pride and affection?

[Co-host]

Well, maybe to him it's the logical conclusion, as we've said many times. Here's a man who's built his brand by slapping his last name on buildings. He was the first developer really to do it. And so he's the natural extension of that.

[Michael Wolff]

And so he feels that the. That has consistently worked for him. And I guess in some way, although it is hard to believe it has.

[Co-host]

Well, and it's taking ownership of government departments and perhaps reminding people, if you walk into those departments every day that this is your boss.

[Michael Wolff]

So it's about dominance again. Dominance, dominance, dominance.

[Co-host]

It's always about dominance.

[Michael Wolff]

And then it's about a cult of personality, and then it's about speaking to the fan base.

[Co-host]

Speaking to the fan base.

[Michael Wolff]

So if you see his not as a political base, but as a fan base, then what matters is the. Is the face, is the person, is the merchandising.

[Co-host]

Yes. And I think it can't be lost on those who work, who walk into those government buildings every day, that he's the boss. For now.

[Michael Wolff]

Yeah. And just always, traditionally there has been. You walk into a government building and there's a frame portrait of whoever the president is, but it's a frame portrait. It exists in a boring capacity. So back to what we talked about before, which is politics is boring. Donald Trump is electric, is crazy, is ridiculous, but he is not boring. And suddenly you've taken those old boring, staid portraits in which the people look dead into this now, this flowing, gigantic portrait, which looks like. Looks like the monster has come to earth.

[Co-host]

Your next chapter in healthcare starts at Carrington College's School of Nursing in Portland. Join us for our open house on Tuesday, January 13th from 4 to 7pm you'll tour our campus, see live demos, meet instructors, and learn about our associate degree in nursing program that prepares you to become a registered nurse. Take the first step toward your nursing career. Save your spot now at Carrington. Edu if you. For information on program outcomes, visit carrington. Edu Sci. Yeah, the sort of political Godzilla. And also, he must have been used to having portraits of himself when he was doing the Apprentice, those absolutely enormous posters on Sunset Boulevard that go up to announce the new season of a show. So he probably just thought, why don't politicians have those? And I could bring them in and it could be a new thing.

[Michael Wolff]

Well, our job now is to find out whose idea was that.

[Co-host]

Yeah, yeah. It's a really great question. It's a great question. And, you know, I did think he was pretty. It felt so amateur, the way he did all the introductions to the Board of Peace, which was this week on Thursday morning. It felt like he hadn't bothered to read the notes. He described everybody in the same way, tough guy, strong guy.

[Michael Wolff]

All he does is he really likes this moment in any Room when he can single out the people that he knows. So he's Tumblr, like in that way. Vegas, you know.

[Co-host]

And it struck me almost as a Catskills comedian.

[Host]

Yes.

[Co-host]

No, I've seen him sort of

[Michael Wolff]

many times and he starts to go on and often if he actually knows the people, then he'll say something kind of off color or personally embarrassing. You know, he had a. He had a. He had a beautiful wife. Beautiful wife. But, you know, time passed. Now he is another. Look at her. Look at that. Isn't that great?

[Co-host]

Well, a bit like he said about the poor man who was sitting round. Was it Harold Hamm, the oil executive who was at the meeting post the Venezuela Maduro takeout? And he goes, harold Hamm, Harold Hamm. Well, he's got some problems going on. And everybody was like, oh my goodness, what are the problems? Cause again, it's unexpected. But I think we have a clip of him here as he's doing his round of introduction. Introductions to the 20 countries that turned up for the Board of Peace meeting.

[Host]

President Pena of Paraguay is here. President. President. Thank you very much. Young, handsome guy. It's always nice to be young and handsome. Doesn't mean we have to like you. I don't like young, handsome men. Women like, men know how to have any interest.

[Co-host]

Such a sort of. Can you imagine any other American president? Can you imagine President Obama doing that? No, no, George W. Wouldn't do that. I mean, it's such a bizarre. And your word. Tumblr is the right word. Tumbler.

[Michael Wolff]

Tum, tum. Not the tumbler.

[Co-host]

T, um, Okay. T U M M L E R.

[Michael Wolff]

No, it's like, it's like at the Friars Club.

[Co-host]

Right, or like a vaudeville.

[Michael Wolff]

Yeah. You know, a comedian who's a little Friars Club.

[Co-host]

Okay. They're a little down on their luck. They're throwing out their last material. They're seeing if they can keep the audience. I mean, such a strange moment, as was the moment where he's talking yesterday and he's referring to having gone to a factory and someone at the factory said, Mr. President, I would like to hug and kiss you. And he's like, please don't. Please don't.

[Michael Wolff]

No, no, no, no. Let's be specific. He said someone at the factory said this. Now it is very likely that no one at the factory said this. That it just comes into his head. It just is a kind of way. I mean, it's actually pretty ineffective speech making way. It's an anecdote. You quote somebody. The fact that these People don't exist is immaterial to him. Matter of fact, there was a period in the first administration where he gave a speech about a friend of mine. A friend of mine went to Paris once and then evermore. When he would come up in a speech with one of these anecdotes about an unidentified person, people in the White House would say, mom, the Paris friend is back.

[Co-host]

Meaning there's no such person.

[Michael Wolff]

No such person? Never.

[Co-host]

No such person.

[Michael Wolff]

I'll guarantee nobody wanted to kiss Donald Trump.

[Co-host]

Well, let's have a look. Can we just. We've got the clip here. Actually, I just want to play the clip because it was so delightful.

[Host]

A lot of the press right here. We're in Georgia, and I said to the owner of. I made a speech at a factory. They made steel products. And I said, how are you? Nice to meet you. How's business? President, I'd love to kiss you. This is a very powerful man. I don't want to be kissed by that man, but a very powerful, strong man. He's been in the steel business for many years. His father started it. And he said, sir, I want to kiss you. I said, why? He said, because we were down to working one hour a week, and then you came in and imposed tariffs, and all of that foreign junk that they were dropping into our country stopped. And we're now going to double shifts seven days a week, and we may be very soon going to 24 hours around the clock, almost seven days a week. He said, sir, I want to kiss you so badly. And I said, no, thank you.

[Co-host]

Now.

[Michael Wolff]

Now, the interesting thing is, I'll bet nothing in that statement was true. Not the kisses, not the 24 hours, not the double shifts, not none of it.

[Co-host]

Well, we know who doesn't want to kiss him, and that is Melania. Melania does not want to kiss him. And she wants us to know she doesn't want to kiss him because that's why she's done her documentary. Is the one thing you take away that this is not in any romantic

[Michael Wolff]

sense a couple or in any geographic sense, which is.

[Co-host]

Or in any geographic sense, quite relevant to me. So you had an interesting column yesterday on Substack about Epstein and friendship. And I've been thinking a lot about the nature of friendship recently, just because I've had a lot of friends come around post surgery. I've had people come and stay. My younger son came. I have a guy.

[Michael Wolff]

I thought you were gonna say you had a lot of friends who went to jail.

[Co-host]

No, I have no friends who Went to jail. I've done my friend inventory. I was trying to think about who's gone to jail. But you know, I have friends who, who really turn up when I need people. I, as a British person, I find it very difficult to admit that I need help. But certainly when you are recovering from hip surgery, you need help. My best friend came from London for several days, which was fantastic, and she was in the middle of a book deadline. So, you know, I was particularly grateful that she came. But if I were to go to jail, which I'm not planning to do, hopefully it's not on the cards, but would I expect my friends to stand by me? And of course you have Prince Andrew, formerly known as Prince, recently arrested and now I think awaiting charges, saying that the reason he didn't drop Jeffrey Epstein was because he was too loyal a friend and he wanted to stay loyal to him because just cause he'd been in jail for soliciting prostitution from a minor, he was still a friend of Andrew's. Now we know that Andrew wanted lots from him and it was a transactional friendship.

[Michael Wolff]

But, but you know, I mean all friendships on some level are transactional. So just to say that doesn't dismiss the friendship. But the, the, the, I mean, I think the, the interesting point here. I mean virtually everybody who, who was friends with Jeffrey Epstein has now said, you know, I wish I had never been, I don't know what, you know, I didn't know, certainly I didn't want to be friend knowing now I wouldn't want to be friends, et cetera, et cetera. Cast off. Instead of saying the question is always how could you have spent time with Jeffrey Epstein? How could you? And the answer, the true answer among all an enormous number of people, a broad section of interest, disciplines. I mean, kind of extraordinary is they spent time with Jeffrey Epstein because he was their friend, they were his friend. All of the attributes of friendship were in place. And that is so to your point about not abandoning him, or you can see it even in a different way, when you are friends with someone, you go out of your way to overlook what their, whatever is negative about them. I mean, you might get to the point where you no longer overlook that, but that's what we do as friends. And that's what all of these people, people who were friends with Jeffrey Epstein were doing. They were genuine friends. And I always thought it was interesting because functionally Jeffrey Epstein is a middleman and New York is kind of a city of middlemen. But the thing about most middlemen in which you can almost instantly tell is their insincerity. And the thing about Jeffrey Epstein, in which I was often a witness to this, is that he really was interested in the people he was in the middle of.

[Co-host]

Did he like people? I mean, he seems so sociopathic. It's hard to imagine that he had any relationships.

[Michael Wolff]

No, I think that's completely. I mean, I think on the one hand, he lacked all intimate relationships. You know, he had a problem, classic problem with intimacy. But he replaced that with a strong connection to people who did interesting things, who had interesting jobs, who were successful and accomplished in the following ways. And he was genuinely interested in those people and genuinely had forged a bond with those people.

[Co-host]

There was a good piece in New York magazine this week, which illustrated the point I was trying to make on our last podcast where you said that Jeffrey didn't shake hands Cause he was a germaphobe. And I always think that germaphobes like Donald Trump, it's such a tell. People are like, oh, I'm a germaphobe. I'm a germaphobe. How could this man be a germaphobe when he was having sex with three different women every single day? What kind of a germaphobe is that? And the piece in New York magazine is about the circle of doctors that he kept close. And there's a description of him having gonorrhea at some point and reaching out to the doctors and then saying, well, these girls will need the shots. And that whole sense of him and his friends trying to manage all this. And then you think about the anecdote of Bill Gates, who was supposed to have caught some kind of STI from a Russian woman who. And then he was trying to smuggle antibiotics to. I mean, is this is how on the germaphobe. It's such a tell.

[Michael Wolff]

Yeah, no, I always thought. I mean, you know, I mean, I sat through Trump's Stormy Daniels trial, and frankly, it was one of the things that constantly came into my head. He's a germaphobe. There's Stormy Daniels. How does this match up? So I don't know the answer to this.

[Co-host]

I mean, there's a solution to all of this. Just use a condom.

[Michael Wolff]

Yeah, well, I'm not going to go there on this, so, I mean.

[Co-host]

Okay, well, I'm not expecting you to go there, but, I mean, it's just.

[Michael Wolff]

Is. I. I don't understand any. Any of this. I don't understand how you would. Anyway, let's not go there. I don't want to go there.

[Co-host]

One of the things I'm finding very complicated about understanding the Epstein files is one, there's so many of them. Two, they are all over social media and, and social media is also full of AI slop. So there are some very good fake emails that look as if they could be real and there are enormous numbers of emails that are purport to be from Ghislaine.

[Host]

Max.

[Michael Wolff]

It's just, it is extraordinary. You know, I watch, I mean, I happen to know the truth about some of this stuff at any rate. And you tune in social media and there is somebody, you can say, everything that I have just heard 100% is completely wrong. And people say it with enormous certainty and earnestness and alarm.

[Co-host]

I wish that Ghislaine Maxwell would give evidence because I've read at least three correspondences which appear that she was, well, at least having intimate emails with Thomas Pritzker, Casey Wasserman and Bill Clinton. All I think concurrently. So she's an under explored person in this whole thing. Partly because she's gone to jail, she's out of sight. And I think I remember saying to you on a couple of podcasts ago, I had a friend who was at Oxford with her, he was gay. She would constantly come up and put her hand down his pants. I mean, I've never heard of a woman doing that. Why on earth would you do that to a gay man? Except that she was very sexualized and very sexually aggressive in a, in a peculiar fashion.

[Michael Wolff]

No, I think she was a classic seductress in the dramatic version of that and which is part insidious and part accomplished, in part a serious disruptor because of this willingness and ability to seduce. And I think she did this on a radical, rather chronic basis. I mean, I know somebody, somebody who, you know, a young woman who she just, she approached randomly in a restaurant in New York, sat down with, gave her her card that kind of. Come on now, this, this person and I, you know, I think clearly the world cleaves here. This person said, okay, there's something wrong there. As opposed to the, to the, to the women who said, oh, this is an opportunity.

[Co-host]

Yeah, it's a very strange, she's as yet a still untold part of this story, I think. And who knows if we'll hear more from her. But what a sort of bizarre character. And how weird that the two of them would have met each other and would have been able to. She was obviously so useful for him, not only in her ability to bring in high profile people, but also her ability to make young women think that nothing untoward would happen because somehow she would, as a woman, protect them.

[Michael Wolff]

Well, also, she seems to have had a. Well, I mean, she had such a horrible father to walk into this situation. I mean, I think Jeffrey Epstein,

[Host]

to

[Michael Wolff]

the people around him, to the. I think he established a very hierarchical relationship, and I think Ghislaine was willing to fit into that because her father obviously established those kinds of relationships with everybody. He was the boss. Everybody else was in service to him in some capacity. This is also true, by the way, about Donald Trump, obviously.

[Co-host]

Well, and the two stories that were sort of legendary on Fleet street, where I spent some time as a young journalist, were that Robert Maxwell would pee from the top of his tower onto people walking below it, onto, you know, unsuspecting pedestrians.

[Michael Wolff]

Well, that's interesting, because one of the scenarios for how Maxwell died is that he was peeing off the side of his boat and then fell in. In.

[Co-host]

So good, so good, so good. New spring arrivals are at Nordstrom Rack stores now. Get ready to save big with up to 60% off rag and bone, Marc Jacobs free people and more. How did I not know Rack has Adidas?

[Michael Wolff]

Because there's always something new.

[Co-host]

Join the NordicLub to unlock exclusive discounts. Shop new arrivals first and more. Plus, buy online and pick up at your favorite rack store for free. Great brands, great prices. That's why you rack great. And then miraculously, when he fell in, well, shortly after it was discovered he'd plundered the pension fund of the Mirror Grave.

[Michael Wolff]

No, no, no, no. It was discovered actually before that. So it was pretty clear that he probably went over the side because he had no recourse. He was. They were all coming. They were coming for him at that point.

[Co-host]

Yeah, well, I think he knew that, but he.

[Michael Wolff]

Maybe. But maybe he was peeing. Obviously, you still have to pee, even if he was a plunderer.

[Co-host]

Well, he was definitely a plunderer. I don't think it was common knowledge that he'd done that, though. It only became apparent the extent of his plundering, which was half a billion dollars, after they heard.

[Michael Wolff]

He knew. He knew that they were all that the police and investigators were.

[Co-host]

Were closing in on him, but the public didn't know. It only became clear after he died quite what trouble he was in, which was that he'd stolen up to half a billion pounds from his pension funds and he was living on hot air these days.

[Michael Wolff]

That seems like a small amount.

[Co-host]

Yeah, but it wasn't a small amount. And at the Time, I think it was one of the biggest ever con jobs on people. But it explained why he was able to live as large as he did, when to a lot of people, it was unclear how he was making any money. But anyway, one of the things he also used to do was to interview people in his car. He famously lived at Headington hall, just outside Oxford. He worked in London. So he would say to people, well, come and we'll do the interview in my car. They would drive up the M4, which is the motorway to Oxford from London. And then when the interview was over, he would have his driver pull over and drop people on the side of the freeway motorway and leave them there. And then they would have to figure out how to get back. So that was another thing that people eventually stopped wanting to have interviews with him because that might happen.

[Michael Wolff]

You know, I once went, I had a meeting with him. I was involved with some journalism startup project, a magazine startup, and I had a meeting with him in London at a suite in the Ritz Hotel. And I was shown in and I sat down with him and we exchanged a few words. And then something happened. He got called away and left the room and left me waiting there. And I waited for. This is embarrassing because I waited for an hour and a half and then finally I thought, okay, I guess he's not coming back. I gotta go. So. And that was my. I think that was my one interaction with Robert that must have gone down

[Co-host]

in Fleet street law too. Anyway, not a far.

[Michael Wolff]

But anyway, the thing is back to in the question about Ghislaine. And I do think that's an unexplored. Her presence and what she did in this, other than recruit young women for Jeffrey Epstein. But her larger position in this whole lifestyle, in this whole weird, weird story, is unexplored.

[Co-host]

Well, she was a sort of courtesan. She was keeping some of the more powerful people in his circle engaged, I think, in.

[Michael Wolff]

Right. But it does then go back to the father, who is such a weird, weird story.

[Co-host]

Does it go back to the father? Does it have to go back to the father? I have so many friends. Well, I think I just want to finish this point because this is a point that a friction with a lot of British friends I have, who knew her, who were at Oxford with her, who are still very fond of her and somehow think that she's ended up carrying the can for Epstein in a way that she shouldn't have done. And they all go. They all say, oh, it goes back to the father. She had a terrible Father. You cannot imagine how awful her father was. And I just think at some point you have to have agency over your own life and she had a terrible father does not excuse the fact that

[Michael Wolff]

you don't have agency over your own life is the tragedy. And when you have a father who is that large, that awful, that in his own right that much of an aberration, well you certainly then have to say, you know, probably and had to something to do with the fire.

[Co-host]

I'm not saying it didn't have anything to do with it. I'm just saying it's not an excuse. It's not an excuse for picking up underage girls.

[Michael Wolff]

We're looking for explanations.

[Co-host]

Explanation. Well it may be some kind of an explanation but it doesn't excuse her behaviour picking up girls.

[Michael Wolff]

I didn't say we're not excusing.

[Co-host]

Delivering them to excuse them.

[Michael Wolff]

No, I think it's an important point. We're not excusing. This is about explaining how did Ghislaine Maxwell get into the position, you know, I'm a writer. This is what you have to do. The larger the context how did this happen? And you certainly, if you're writing this story can't ignore the fact the Robert Maxwell element of it all.

[Co-host]

Well, she had I think eight brothers and sisters and none of them procured underage women for Jeffrey Epstein.

[Michael Wolff]

No. But nevertheless actually they were in themselves have had had odd careers and odd lives and I know this because I was actually almost in business with one of them and there's a very funny I think account of this in my book Burn Rate and they became Internet grifters.

[Co-host]

Oh, I think I remember this. When you went to see them for money,

[Michael Wolff]

I almost became part of their grift and that actually was a moment in which the bankers told me I was worth an enormous amount of money. But then their grift became apparent and then I said how much am I worth now? And it was all passed.

[Co-host]

Well, happily you fell back on your actual ability which is as a brilliant observer and writer and it turns out that you've been writing a about the people that have been at the center of our culture for the last few years. So we are the beneficiaries of that Michael Wolff, which is a very nice note to end on this Saturday. So if you have been. Thank you for joining us. Don't forget to leave us a comment on YouTube. Feel free to subscribe to become a Beebeast Tier member. So the good news is we have so many Beebeast Tier members now. There are too many names to read out and we really appreciate your support. Thanks to our production team. Devon Rogerino Ryan Murray Rachel Passer Heather Passaro Neil Rosenhaus well, the holidays have

[Michael Wolff]

come and gone once again, but if

[Co-host]

you've forgotten to get that special someone

[Michael Wolff]

in your life a gift, well, Mint Mobile is extending their holiday offer of half off unlimited wireless.

[Co-host]

So here's the idea.

[Michael Wolff]

You get it now, you call it an early present for next year. What do you have to lose? Give it a [e-mail] Switch limited time,

[Co-host]

50% off regular price for new customers. Upfront payment required $45 for 3 months, $90 for 6 month or $180 for 12 month plan taxes and fees. Extra speeds may slow after 50 gigabytes per month when network is busy. See terms.