Summary of "Can the Cease-Fire in Gaza Hold?" – The Daily, February 26, 2025

Hosted by Michael Barbaro and Sabrina Tavernise, The Daily by The New York Times delves into the complexities surrounding the fragile ceasefire between Israel and Hamas. In this episode, host Rachel Abrams engages in a comprehensive discussion with Jerusalem Bureau Chief Patrick Kingsley to unpack the current state of the ceasefire, the challenges it faces, and the geopolitical maneuvers shaping the future of Gaza.

1. Introduction to the Ceasefire

Rachel Abrams introduces the episode by setting the stage for the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, highlighting the uncertainty surrounding Gaza's future amidst the intricate dynamics of control involving Israel, Hamas, and unexpected influences such as former President Donald Trump.

2. Progress and Challenges in the Ceasefire's First Phase

Patrick Kingsley provides an overview of the initial phase of the ceasefire, emphasizing that "several mini crises aside, it has gone roughly to plan" (01:47). The main objectives included exchanging 33 hostages held by Hamas for approximately 1,500 Palestinian prisoners in Israeli custody. Kingsley recaps the timeline:

• Hostage Situation: At the war's onset, Hamas captured around 250 Israeli hostages. Prior exchanges had already freed some, but about 100 remained as of January when the ceasefire was enacted.

• Exchange Process: The agreement stipulated that hostages would be released weekly in batches, a process fraught with emotional and political tension.

Despite the overarching success, the exchanges were marred by “immensely traumatic scenes” (03:43), fueling fears of a potential collapse of the ceasefire.

3. The Hostage Release Ceremonies: A Pyrrhic Victory

Kingsley describes the weekly release events, highlighting their dual impact on both Israeli and Palestinian societies:

• Hostage Releases: Freed hostages were displayed on stage before Israeli crowds, often appearing "extremely gaunt" and malnourished (03:43). These public displays, accompanied by banners condemning Israel, incited anger and feelings of humiliation within Israel.

• Prisoner Releases: Conversely, Palestinian prisoners were also released but often under degrading conditions, such as wearing garments with slogans like "we will never forgive" (03:43), which exacerbated tensions.

4. The Tragic Incident of the Bibas Family

A particularly distressing event unfolded during one of the release ceremonies involving the Bibas family:

• The Incident: On 04:40, Kingsley recounts the release of the bodies of three Israeli civilians — two young boys, Ariel Bibas (four years old) and Kfir Bibas (eight months old), and their mother, Shiri Bibas (32) — intended to be returned to Israel (06:40). However, it was later revealed that Shiri's body was mistakenly identified, leading to initial misinformation and public outcry.

• Aftermath: The Israeli military conducted an autopsy, confirming that the children died due to Hamas militants in Gaza, not Israeli airstrikes (06:45). Eventually, Hamas located and returned Shiri Bibas's correct body, but not before causing significant trauma and distrust within Israeli society (08:39).

This incident intensified Israeli frustration and led to delays in the prisoner exchanges, heightening the risk of the ceasefire's deterioration.

5. Hamas' Strategy and Its Implications

Kingsley analyzes Hamas' motivations behind the contentious release ceremonies:

• Projection of Power: By orchestrating high-profile releases, Hamas aims to assert its continued influence and authority in Gaza, countering Israel's military actions and maintaining relevance amidst ongoing conflict (09:48).

• Psychological Warfare: The dramatic presentations are designed to instill fear and showcase resilience, reinforcing Hamas' position both internally among Palestinians and externally against Israel (10:20).

Despite significant Israeli military efforts to dismantle Hamas' infrastructure, Kingsley notes that Hamas remains a formidable force in Gaza, complicating any long-term ceasefire prospects (10:28).

6. The Future of the Ceasefire: Uncertainties and Scenarios

As the first 42-day phase of the ceasefire approaches its end (11:34), Kingsley outlines three potential outcomes:

1. Continuation of an Informal Truce: The ceasefire may persist in a less structured manner, maintaining a fragile peace while negotiations continue.

2. Formal Extension: Proposed by President Trump's Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, this would involve extending the ceasefire with additional hostage and prisoner exchanges without addressing the core issues (12:26).

3. Comprehensive Governance Deal: An unlikely scenario where both sides agree on Gaza's future governance, which remains unresolved due to entrenched positions (13:57).

If no agreement is reached, the threat of renewed conflict looms, with Israel prepared to resume military operations, as indicated by Prime Minister Netanyahu (14:09).

7. President Trump's "Riviera" Proposal for Gaza

A pivotal development in the ceasefire negotiations is President Trump's controversial proposal:

• The Proposal: Announced during a White House event, Trump suggested that the U.S. "take over the Gaza Strip," effectively depopulating it to allow Palestinians to live in "peace" elsewhere (17:21). This plan implied relocating Gaza's 2 million residents to neighboring countries like Egypt and Jordan.

• Reception and Reactions:

  • Israeli Right-Wing: Some factions welcomed the idea, aligning with long-standing desires to reestablish Israeli control over Gaza.

  • Israeli Center and Palestinians: The center exhibited skepticism about the feasibility and potential chaos of such a move, while Palestinians viewed it as a "second Nakba" — a catastrophic displacement reminiscent of the 1948 exodus (20:03).

  • Arab Nations: Initial horror gave way to a reluctant acknowledgment of the need for Arab-led solutions, pushing them to formulate their own proposals for Gaza's governance (21:02).

• Trump's Intent: According to Steve Witkoff, Trump's aim was not the literal implementation of the proposal but to stimulate Arab nations into action, encouraging them to propose viable solutions for Gaza's future (22:22).

8. Arab Nations' Response and the Path Forward

In response to Trump's proposal, Arab leaders convened to devise strategies independent of U.S. directives:

• Riyadh and Cairo Meetings: Arab nations are exploring frameworks that would place Palestinian governance under multinational oversight, excluding Hamas, in exchange for eventual Palestinian statehood (23:05).

• Challenges: These plans require significant concessions from both Hamas — relinquishing its governance and military roles — and Israel — committing to Palestinian sovereignty, both of which remain deeply contentious (24:18).

Kingsley likens the negotiations to a sophisticated but unsolvable puzzle, where progress in one area may hinder advancement in another, encapsulating the enduring complexity of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict (26:04).

9. Implications of the Ceasefire's Status and Future Prospects

Rachel Abrams and Patrick Kingsley reflect on the broader implications of the ceasefire's precarious status:

• U.S. Involvement: Trump's overt alignment with Israeli interests contrasts with previous administrations and influences both Israeli and Palestinian negotiation stances (27:09).

• Potential for Resumption of Conflict: Critics argue that the strong U.S. support for Israel under Trump may embolden Israel to resume military actions if the ceasefire fails, leading to further devastation in Gaza (28:35).

• Long-Term Peace Prospects: Despite various proposals, lasting peace remains elusive due to uncompromising positions from both sides and the overarching geopolitical tensions (26:08).

10. Conclusion

The episode underscores the fragile nature of the current ceasefire in Gaza, highlighting deep-seated animosities, political posturing, and the intricate web of international diplomacy. With key stakeholders holding steadfast to their demands and external influences complicating negotiations, the path to a sustainable peace remains uncertain and fraught with potential setbacks.

This summary encapsulates the critical discussions and insights from "Can the Cease-Fire in Gaza Hold?" providing a comprehensive overview for those seeking to understand the intricate dynamics of the ongoing conflict and its broader geopolitical ramifications.

Notable Quotes:

• Patrick Kingsley [01:47]: "Several mini crises aside, it has gone roughly to plan."

• Patrick Kingsley [03:43]: "There have been some immensely traumatic scenes for both Israelis and Palestinians that have led to constant fears that this initial ceasefire was about to collapse."

• Donald Trump [17:21]: "The US will take over the Gaza Strip and we will do a job with it, too."

• Patrick Kingsley [22:22]: "That was the case before President Trump made his proposal, and it remains the case now."

• Patrick Kingsley [26:04]: "The riddle of Gaza has not been solved in the last 16 months of war, but also not really over the last 75 years of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict."

For full access to The Daily and more in-depth analyses, subscribe at nytimes.com/podcasts or find us on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.