Is China Beating Trump?

Summary

Podcast Summary: "Is China Beating Trump?"

The Daily | The New York Times | October 29, 2025
Host: Natalie Kitroeff
Guest: Keith Bradshaw (Beijing Correspondent)

---

Main Theme

This episode examines the intense escalation in the US-China trade war, focusing on China's latest retaliatory measures involving rare earth export controls and their global ramifications. The discussion unpacks whether China now has the upper hand over the Trump administration, why these moves matter, and what the future holds as President Trump prepares for high-stakes talks with President Xi Jinping.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Renewed Tensions: The State of US-China Relations

• The trade conflict, previously perceived as cooling, has reignited with China adopting "the most aggressive act of retaliation to date" ([00:52]).
• Both sides are threatening "measures bordering on economic warfare" ([02:06], Keith Bradshaw), creating a sense of urgency ahead of the leaders' meeting in South Korea.

2. Major Sticking Points in Negotiations

• US Demands:
  • Restarting Chinese purchases of US soybeans.
  • Curbing Chinese export of chemicals used in fentanyl production.
• China's Demands:
  • Lifting US semiconductor export restrictions.
  • No US interference in Taiwan.
• The Overarching Issue:
  • China's control over rare earth metals and plans to restrict access to them, intensifying the conflict ([03:54], Bradshaw).

3. China's Rare Earths 'Bazooka'

• China expanded rare earth restrictions on October 9, 2025, targeting not just direct exports, but also prohibiting the use of Chinese patents, technology, or equipment for global rare earth manufacturing ([04:16]–[05:40]).
• The rules block the movement of products containing Chinese rare earths across borders and expand the range of restricted minerals.
• Impact on global defense: Threatens Europe's ability to manufacture military systems, including support for Ukraine ([05:53], Bradshaw).

Notable Quote

"They have pointed a bazooka at the supply chains and the industrial base of the entire free world."
– Commentator/Guest ([06:19])

---

4. How Unprecedented Are Such Controls?

• US has restricted semiconductor exports, but China's rules combine high-tech export controls with raw material restrictions—a "high-tech restriction and... a raw material restriction, both at the same time" ([07:03]–[08:09], Bradshaw).

Notable Quote

"This is China seeking a new global level of comprehensive control... This is China trying to make sure that it controls global commerce and can turn on and off the taps."
– Keith Bradshaw ([08:16]–[08:47])

---

5. China's Geopolitical Strategy & Signaling

• China is "not allowing itself to be pushed around," signaling a new level of toughness in negotiations.
• Beijing has strengthened its alliances with Russia and North Korea, showing a unified front ([09:04]–[09:47], Bradshaw).

6. Global and National Security Implications

• The restrictions are "extremely damaging" to any advanced manufacturing countries—especially the US and Europe ([10:00]–[10:16]).
• US automakers, for example, face shortages in rare earth magnets needed for products like power seat motors.
• Military production is hampered: Shortages affect the supply of weapons and equipment to Ukraine, seen as a "big win for Russia" ([12:52], Bradshaw).

---

7. China's Simultaneous Disputes with Europe

• The EU imposed tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs)—but left a "hybrid loophole" that China exploited by adding small gasoline engines to EVs, avoiding tariffs ([13:53]–[14:47]).
• China pressures Europe not to close this loophole and leans toward Russia on Ukraine, hoping to weaken transatlantic ties.

8. Does China Have the Upper Hand?

• Short-term: Yes, due to control over supply chains.
• Long-term dangers for China:
  • Damages reputation as a reliable supplier.
  • Multinationals searching for alternatives.
  • Risks losing foreign investment and overplaying its leverage ([15:34]–[17:12]).

Notable Quote

"China may have overplayed its hand."
– Keith Bradshaw ([17:12])

---

9. Has the US Overplayed Its Hand?

• US is forced into a hardline stance due to China's aggressive manufacturing expansion.
• Trump's escalations may have forced China into a corner, resulting in harsher retaliations.
• The US (and formerly the Biden administration) had no good options; any approach risked backlash ([17:32]–[19:04]).

Notable Quote

"It's like you're damned if you do, you're damned if you don't."
– Natalie Kitroeff ([19:48])

---

10. Effectiveness of US Policy

• Trump's tariffs dropped direct Chinese exports to the US by 20%, but China reroutes exports through third countries (e.g., Vietnam, Mexico).
• US manufacturing remains at risk without a stronger industrial base ([20:11]–[21:28]).

---

11. What to Expect from Trump-Xi Talks

• Look for a "dramatic announcement of temporary agreements and incremental changes" ([21:54]).
• Possible outcomes:
  • Postponement (not reversal) of some Chinese restrictions.
  • Modest Chinese soybean purchases.
  • Promises regarding fentanyl precursor chemicals.
  • Announcements likely more about optics than substance ([21:54]–[22:44]).

Notable Quote

"A narrow deal perhaps announced with great fanfare."
– Natalie Kitroeff ([22:39]) "Exactly. The two countries leaders might be able to establish a floor for the relationship here."
– Keith Bradshaw ([22:44])

---

Memorable Moments & Quotes (with Timestamps)

• Trade war escalation: “There's an urgency to resolving these issues.” – Keith Bradshaw ([02:06])
• China's leverage: “They have pointed a bazooka at the supply chains and the industrial base of the entire free world.” – Guest ([06:19])
• Why China’s move matters: “This is China seeking a new global level of comprehensive control.” – Bradshaw ([08:16])
• Both sides at risk: “China may have overplayed its hand.” – Bradshaw ([17:12])
• US stuck in a bind: “It's like you're damned if you do, you're damned if you don't.” – Kitroeff ([19:48])
• Negotiation outlook: “A narrow deal perhaps announced with great fanfare.” – Kitroeff ([22:39])

---

Timestamps for Key Segments

• Trade war ramping back up – [01:33]–[02:24]
• Main negotiation issues – [02:34]–[04:16]
• China’s rare earth controls explained – [04:16]–[06:04]
• Market/economic fallout and ‘bazooka’ metaphor – [06:04]–[06:28]
• How China’s approach differs from US export controls – [07:03]–[08:09]
• China’s changing geopolitical posture – [09:04]–[09:47]
• Implications for global industries – [09:47]–[10:16]
• US/EU rare earths & military supply crisis – [12:06]–[12:52]
• Europe’s parallel conflict with China over EVs – [13:53]–[14:47]
• The debate: who holds the upper hand, and for how long? – [15:34]–[17:32]
• US forced into tough choices – [17:32]–[19:48]
• China’s export rerouting, effectiveness of trade war – [20:11]–[21:28]
• What to expect from the Trump-Xi meeting – [21:54]–[23:01]

---

Tone and Language

• Analytical, urgent, and at times, skeptical about government strategies.
• Natalie Kitroeff guides the conversation with probing, often wryly cynical questions.
• Bradshaw delivers nuanced, in-depth explanations with clear analogies (Arab oil embargo, high-tech controls, “bazooka” metaphor).

---

Summary Takeaway

The episode paints a picture of a US-China trade relationship at a critical inflection point, with China wielding rare earth exports as a formidable weapon. Although China has short-term leverage, both sides face significant risks from this high-stakes standoff. The Trump administration is boxed in by policy choices; China may jeopardize its long-term economic interests. Ahead of a key meeting, expectations are set for at best an incremental, unstable truce—leaving the world braced for continued volatility.

---

Transcript

[Comcast Business Announcer]

In just 12 months, Comcast Business detected 34.6 billion cyber threats. That's not just a number, it's billions of attempts every day aimed at businesses like yours. More than every person on earth, multiplied by four. But luckily, our advanced cybersecurity, intelligent networking and 24, 7 coverage is built to protect what matters most, your business. When the stakes are this high, protection isn't optional, it's essential. Get threat ready with Comcast Business. Learn [e-mail] cybersecurity.

[Natalie Kitro]

From the New York Times, I'm Natalie Kitro. Hev. This is the Daily.

[Narrator/Reporter]

President Trump's trade.

[Natalie Kitro]

War against China has so far proven.

[Narrator/Reporter]

Much harder to win than his administration ever let on. And it's only getting worse as China undertakes its most aggressive act of retaliation to date. Today, my colleague Keith Bradshaw on a.

[Natalie Kitro]

Potential turning point in the standoff as.

[Narrator/Reporter]

President Trump meets this week with Chinese leader Xi Jinping in what will be their first talks since the trade war began.

[Natalie Kitro]

It's Wednesday, October 29th. Keith, I think a lot of us, frankly, started to feel as though this trade war may have finally died down. I think we were lulled perhaps into a false sense of calm when there wasn't that much news on this for months. But then all of a sudden things seemed to heat back up again.

[Narrator/Reporter]

So give us a sense of the.

[Natalie Kitro]

State of the relationship right now.

[Keith Bradshaw]

The relationship is at one of its.

[Analyst/Commentator]

Tensest moments in years. Both sides have threatened measures bordering on economic warfare against each other. There's an urgency to resolving these issues.

[Keith Bradshaw]

At the meeting on Thursday in South.

[Analyst/Commentator]

Korea between the two countries top leadership.

[Keith Bradshaw]

Here in Beijing, everyone is watching to see can they reach some kind of a deal that pulls both countries back from the brink?

[Natalie Kitro]

And what are the main sticking points right now in these negotiations? Like what do we expect to come up in that meeting?

[Keith Bradshaw]

The United States wants China to start buying soybeans again. China has a boycott against American soybeans right now because of its unhappiness with American policies. The United States wants China to stop shipping the chemicals that are used in Mexico and Latin America to make fentanyl. China wants the United States to allow it to buy any kinds of semiconductors it wants, including some of the most advanced semiconductors used in artificial intelligence and high performance military systems. And China in particular wants America to distance itself from Taiwan, although America depends enormously on Taiwan for semiconductors. But hanging over all of these issues is a big debate over rare earth metals. China is threatening to cut off much of the world's Supply. And it's saying that it will block any effort outside of China to manufacture rare earths and rare earth magnets in competition with China.

[Natalie Kitro]

Can you just unpack what exactly China did? Because this was something that I think a lot of people were talking about as a major escalation. There were new restrictions right, on these rare earth minerals. These are critically important to everything from missiles to cars. We need them. And China was saying you can't have them. What exactly happened?

[Keith Bradshaw]

Rare earths are very important these days. They are used all over the economy, whether it's cars, computer chips, fighter jets, missiles. China controls the materials, rare earth metals for making them anywhere in the world. And it has put already in April some export controls on supplying those materials. And on October 9, China said we're going to put a lot more restrictions on these. China is expanding its restrictions on rare earths exports. The new rules do three things. One, they prevent the west from being able to build its own mines and refineries and magnet factories, or at least they make it much more difficult for the west to do that. So no more using any Chinese patents without permission. No more buying equipment from China to do any of this. And China makes almost all the equipment for mining and refining rare earths or making magnets. Second, the new rules put restrictions on what you are allowed to move across any country's borders if it has Chinese magnets and rare earths inside it. And third, China is saying for the first time that it's going to restrict even more kinds of rare earths than it did the first time around last April. And so this will affect even more military production, for example, making it hard for Europe to build weapon systems for Ukraine or for Europe to protect itself against Russia.

[Commentator/Guest]

Mr. Trump just announced a 100% add on tariff to China for their export controls on rare earths.

[Narrator/Reporter]

And look at this sell off tonight.

[Keith Bradshaw]

The stock market plunging nearly 900 points at the close.

[Commentator/Guest]

This is China versus the world. They have pointed a bazooka at the supply chains and the industrial base of the entire free world.

[Keith Bradshaw]

And that's why Treasury Secretary Scott Besant said that these new rules are a bazooka aimed at the entire world's supply chains.

[Commentator/Guest]

And you know, we're not going to have it.

[Natalie Kitro]

I have to say for me, this is like a control freaks approach to trade restrictions. Is this normal? Like do countries typically make their trade rules this specific, this in depth, so as to control every aspect of how a product is used?

[Keith Bradshaw]

The United States has done this with the fastest semiconductors. So about the top 3 to 5% of the world's semiconductors do have these very restrictive rules from the United States that do track what downstream products they are later built into. What is new and different about China's rules is that China is putting the restrictions on a raw material and then saying that products that are later manufactured from that raw material are also restricted. So in a way, this is a combination of the US Rules on semiconductors combined with the Arab oil embargo in 1973 against the United States and its allies, which was aimed at halting American support for Israel at the time. So it is both a high tech restriction and in China's case, it is now also a raw material restriction, both at the same time.

[Natalie Kitro]

Can I ask, Keith, do you agree with Besant's assessment that this is China pulling out a bazooka?

[Keith Bradshaw]

I really do. This is China trying to make sure that it controls global commerce and can turn on and off the taps not just for goods leaving China, but for goods moving across Europe, across North America, across South Asia, you name it. This is seeking a new global level of comprehensive control out of Beijing by the Ministry of Commerce.

[Natalie Kitro]

And how should we interpret the fact that China's decided to do this now? Is that a sign that the Chinese government has kind of reached a point of no return in these negotiations, that they're using what sounds like one of their biggest points of leverage?

[Keith Bradshaw]

China has concluded that it benefits from taking very strong stands towards Trump and also towards Europe. This is a China that is not allowing itself to be pushed around. We've now seen top Chinese leaders line up with the leaders of Russia and North Korea at military parades twice in six weeks in Beijing and then in Pyongyang. And so China has really, in some ways, embarked on a new geopolitical stance and a new economic stance on of standing tough against the west to protect China's strategic interests.

[Natalie Kitro]

And for the rest of us, for the rest of the world, what are.

[Keith Bradshaw]

The implications for the rest of the world? This could be extremely damaging. Any country with an advanced manufacturing sector.

[Analyst/Commentator]

Has to be really worried about this.

[Natalie Kitro]

We'll be right back.

[Comcast Business Announcer]

In just 12 months, Comcast Business detected 34.6 billion cyber threats. That's a lot. If you tried to count them all out loud, one per second, you'd be counting for more than 1,000 years. But luckily, you don't have to count them or fight them, because Comcast Business helps block billions of cyber threats every single year with advanced security solutions. So you can focus on what matters most, your business. Get Threat Ready with Comcast Business. Learn [e-mail] cybersecurity this is Sarah Koenig, host of Serial.

[Sarah Koenig]

I want to tell you about our new show. It's called the Preventionist and it's hosted by Diane Neary. A couple years ago, Diane got a tip about something strange happening in eastern Pennsylvania. Parents were claiming they'd walked into a hospital to get medical care for their children and then were forced to leave without them. The families were blaming this one hospital network and many of them pointed to a single pediatrician. So who was this doctor and why were all these people suddenly losing custody of their kids? From Serial Productions and the New York Times, it's the Preventionist, the story of a doctor and the rise of a powerful specialty inside pediatric Medicine. Listen wherever you get your podcasts. Eligible time subscribers can listen to the show right now on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. So head there to subscribe or listen anywhere. October 30th.

[Narrator/Reporter]

Let'S talk about what you.

[Natalie Kitro]

Mean, Keith, when you said this could be extremely damaging. Spell out for me what kind of damage we'd be looking at in the US with these restrictions.

[Keith Bradshaw]

There is the immediate damage of American companies continuing to have trouble getting enough rare earth magnets just to make their day to day products. Detroit has been struggling to get enough brake motors, steering motors, power seat motors, all these different systems that require rare earth magnets. And as more of these Chinese regulations from October 9th take effect, it will become even harder for American companies, for example, even to move parts across the border from Mexico or across the border from Canada.

[Natalie Kitro]

What about the national security implications of this? Because you've told us rare earths go into missiles, go into a ton of military equipment.

[Keith Bradshaw]

The west is already having trouble in slowing down production of some military items because of the shortage of rare earths. The west failed to stockpile these rare earths in advance. And so the military contractors trying to supply Ukraine or trying to rebuild inventories in the west are really having trouble procuring the magnets they need. So this is a big win for Russia because the west really needs these rare earths to continue supplying military equipment to Ukraine to defend itself. And now that supply has been cut off cold by China.

[Natalie Kitro]

Fascinating.

[Narrator/Reporter]

This clearly has pretty big consequences for Europe, which is honestly kind of surprising. I thought this was a US China trade war. Why is China now putting the screws to Europe?

[Keith Bradshaw]

China has a whole separate dispute going with Europe over cars.

[Analyst/Commentator]

The European Union became very concerned last year that China had subsidized the development of electric cars and was going to flood the European market with electric cars.

[Keith Bradshaw]

And so the European Union put tariffs in place and there was a big loophole left in these tariffs, which is that if you put a tiny gasoline engine in along with a great big electric system in these cars, then you don't pay any tariffs at all. And so China has been flooding the European market, particularly this year, with exactly that category of highly capable electric cars with a tiny gasoline engine included, and they don't face any extra tariffs. China does not want Europe to raise the tariffs.

[Analyst/Commentator]

It does not want Europe to close the hybrid loophole. So China is putting a lot of pressure on Europe. And then finally, China has leaned towards Russia on the Ukraine issue. China wants Europe to distance itself from the United States in NATO.

[Keith Bradshaw]

So China has a lot of incentives.

[Analyst/Commentator]

To be very tough with Europe and has been very tough with Europe this year.

[Natalie Kitro]

Listening to you, Keith, I have to say it does seem as though China has the ability to inflict just enormous pain with this. If China is willing to go this far in the trade war, it does seem fair to say that they have the upper hand. Am I wrong about that?

[Keith Bradshaw]

Short term, China does have a very strong position, but there are real long term dangers to the Chinese economy in pursuing this strategy. So many multinational companies have come to rely on China for part or all of their supplies of many components, many products that you see in stores all over the United States. And as China shows that it's willing practically overnight to halt these supplies, China is damaging its reputation as a reliable supplier. European and American companies are frantically searching for ways to buy more from Southeast Asia, from India and from elsewhere. So there is a long term interest in China in not taking this too far. In fact, it's already gone far enough that they are worried in China that they may be losing their appeal as a destination for foreign investment. Who wants to build another factory in China if you're not going to be able to send the goods from that factory out of China?

[Natalie Kitro]

It's interesting. It's like China in trying to show the world, look, you really can't live without us. You can't live without our rare earths. Beijing may actually be spurring the world to look for ways to live without it, to find a way to reduce that reliance on China for just about everything.

[Keith Bradshaw]

That is exactly right. China is not backing down in any way. China is all in on restricting rare earths. That's a risky position to be in when you're a country like China that lives on exports. Even as the Domestic economy is a mess. So China may have overplayed its hand.

[Natalie Kitro]

But it seems equally possible, plausible even, that the US Actually overplayed its hand because it's forced China into this point of no return where now it's pulling out the big guns, where now it's using its biggest point of leverage and forcing everyone into a corner.

[Keith Bradshaw]

It's possible the US has overplayed its hand, but the US Is in a very difficult position because China has enormous overcapacity of factories. And just last Thursday, we had a pivotal moment. The Central Committee of the entire Communist Party said, we're going to double down on manufacturing. We want to be the country that makes everything. And that is a direct challenge to.

[Analyst/Commentator]

The United States and Europe, which still.

[Keith Bradshaw]

Have some manufacturing sectors, and to Japan.

[Analyst/Commentator]

And to South Korea.

[Keith Bradshaw]

This emphasis on making practically all kinds of advanced technology is really a worry. And so the United States is on the spot. Now, does it take a short term strategy of accepting a deal that gets it back to where it was at the start of the year, but risks.

[Analyst/Commentator]

Further deterioration of what's left of the.

[Keith Bradshaw]

American manufacturing sector, or does it continue to have a confrontation, but that could be very painful?

[Natalie Kitro]

So are you saying it's possible that the US Overplayed its hand, but it had no other option?

[Keith Bradshaw]

The US Was not in a good.

[Analyst/Commentator]

Position to begin with, and the Biden administration had struggled with the same issue. The Biden strategy was to proceed cautiously and avoid an outright confrontation, unlike Trump. But the Biden administration also had the weakness of not really slowing down China's remarkable race towards dominance of an extremely wide range of manufacturing industries. And so the Trump administration felt a need to go considerably farther. And that has now triggered an outsized response from Beijing.

[Natalie Kitro]

You're sort of saying it's like you're damned if you do, you're damned if you don't. If you don't go hard enough to try to combat China's dominance in manufacturing, nothing actually gets done about it. But if you do go too hard, you risk eliciting this kind of really potentially damaging retaliation.

[Keith Bradshaw]

That's exactly right, Natalie.

[Natalie Kitro]

But has all this poking of the bear that the Trump administration's done actually done anything to slow China's progression toward the most dominant superpower manufacturing country that we've ever seen?

[Analyst/Commentator]

Yes, the Trump administration tariffs have resulted in a significant drop in Chinese exports to the United states, more than 20% this year compared to last year. On the other hand, China has been ramping up exports to other countries, such as Vietnam. And you get estimates that as much as 85% of China's exports to Vietnam then end up in the United States. So Chinese exporters have been very nimble in finding alternative routes through countries like Vietnam and Mexico to still reach the US Market. But the Trump administration felt it needed to do something because the US Industrial base has been rapidly hollowing out.

[Keith Bradshaw]

And without a strong manufacturing sector, the US Cannot remain a strong country with a strong conventional military that can protect not only the United States, but other democracies around the world.

[Natalie Kitro]

The situation you've described is one where the stakes are just incredibly high for both sides. So at this meeting between Trump and Xi this week, what should we expect to see? Do you expect a dramatic announcement or just the continuation of what we've seen before, which is incremental agreements, temporary pauses, et cetera?

[Keith Bradshaw]

I expect a dramatic announcement of temporary.

[Analyst/Commentator]

Agreements and incremental changes.

[Keith Bradshaw]

I think that what we will see is a postponement, for example, of China's rare earth restrictions, but not a repeal of them. I think we are likely to see some Chinese purchases of American soybeans, but not on a scale that they previously were. One other aspect that we'll probably see is some kind of Chinese promise to limit exports of chemicals used in making fentanyl. And then we may see a promise to get together and have a more in depth conversation in China next February.

[Natalie Kitro]

So a narrow deal perhaps announced with great fanfare.

[Keith Bradshaw]

Exactly. The two countries leaders might be able to establish a floor for the relationship here.

[Analyst/Commentator]

They might begin to change the trajectory.

[Keith Bradshaw]

So that next year they can begin.

[Analyst/Commentator]

To patch together something better.

[Keith Bradshaw]

Because if they don't, then we could.

[Analyst/Commentator]

Be headed for ever greater confrontation between two superpowers with enormous ability to harm each other and the entire world.

[Natalie Kitro]

Well, Keith, thank you. Thanks for making us all smarter in anticipation of it.

[Keith Bradshaw]

Thank you. Always good to talk to you, Natalie.

[Natalie Kitro]

We'll be right back.

[Comcast Business Announcer]

In just 12 months, Comcast Business detected 34.6 billion cyber threats. That's over 34 billion, meaning nine zeros.

[Keith Bradshaw]

Nine.

[Comcast Business Announcer]

That's a lot of zeros. Especially when one breach is all it takes to hurt your business. Luckily, Comcast Business offers advanced cybersecurity, intelligent networking and 24,7 hands on monitoring to help stop billions of attacks from burying your business in all of those zeros. Want to learn how? Get threat ready with Comcast business. Go to comcastbusiness.com cybersecurity I'm Helene Cooper.

[Helene Cooper]

I cover the U.S. military for the New York Times. So I'm sitting in my car in a parking lot outside the Pentagon. I had a cubicle with a desk inside the building for years, but the Trump administration has taken that away. People in power have always made it difficult for journalists. It hasn't stopped us in the past, it's not going to stop us now. I will keep working to get you the facts. This work doesn't happen without subscribers to the New York Times.

[Narrator/Reporter]

Here's what else you should know today. Hurricane Melissa made landfall on Tuesday, and it carved a path of destruction across Jamaica as one of the strongest Category 5 storms on record. It wasn't clear exactly how much damage Jamaica had sustained because of limited communications, but Jamaican Officials said that 15,000 people were in government shelters. More than half a million people, or about a sixth of the country's population, were without power. And on Tuesday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the Trump administration had launched yet another round of deadly strikes on boats that it claims were smuggling drugs, killing 14 people in four vessels. Hegseth said the strikes took place in international waters and that there'd been one survivor. The attacks bring the overall death toll in the growing US Military campaign off the Central and South American coasts to 57. Finally, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ordered the Israeli military to conduct strikes in Gaza. On Tuesday, the Israeli government accused Hamas of violating the ceasefire agreement by firing on Israeli forces and failing to return the bodies of dead hostages. Netanyahu's office said the prime minister had informed President Trump before the action was taken. Hamas denied involvement in an attack on Israeli forces and in a statement said it remained committed to the ceasefire agreement, which it accused Israel of violating. Today's episode was produced by Mary Wilson and Ricky Novetsky. It was edited by Lisa Chow, contains original music by Dan Powell, Marion Lozano and Pat McCusker, and was engineered by Alyssa Moxley. That's it for the Daily. I'm Natalie Kitro F. See you tomorrow.

[Comcast Business Announcer]

This podcast is supported by Comcast Business. Cyber threats are rising. In just 12 months, Comcast business has detected 4.7 billion phishing attempts. Get threat ready with advanced security solutions from Comcast Business. Learn [e-mail] cybersecurity.