Trump Said Peace in Ukraine Would Come Easy. It Hasn’t.

Summary

Podcast Summary: The Daily - "Peace in Ukraine Is Harder Than Trump Thought"

Episode Information

• Title: Peace in Ukraine Is Harder Than Trump Thought
• Host: The New York Times
• Host/Author: Rachel Abrams
• Guest: Michael Crowley
• Release Date: May 21, 2025

---

1. Introduction to the Conflict and Trump's Role

Rachel Abrams opens the episode by highlighting President Donald Trump's initial confidence in negotiating an end to Russia's war in Ukraine. Contrary to his belief that securing peace would be straightforward, Trump's efforts have proven more complex and frustrating than anticipated.

2. Fallout from the Trump-Zelensky Meeting

Following a contentious meeting in the Oval Office between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, tensions escalated. Michael Crowley explains that Trump's public beratement of Zelensky led to significant panic among Ukrainians and their allies.

Michael Crowley [02:46]: "Trump declared that Ukraine was not ready for a peace deal... and, you know, what was happening was not only was Trump castigating Zelensky... but accelerating his diplomacy with Moscow..."

Trump's approach included suspending U.S. military aid and intelligence sharing with Ukraine, simultaneously expressing eagerness to mend relations with Russia, which alarmed Ukrainian supporters.

3. Zelensky's Strategic Response

In response to Trump's actions, Zelensky adjusted his public stance, becoming more cautious in his statements about the U.S. and enhancing behind-the-scenes diplomacy. European leaders like British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and France's Emmanuel Macron played pivotal roles in mediating between Trump and Ukrainian officials.

Michael Crowley [05:00]: "Zelensky and Ukraine very cleverly shift their posture... Ukraine agrees on March 11 to a US proposal for a 30 day ceasefire with Russia..."

4. The Shift Toward Negotiation and Early Challenges

Ukraine's willingness to entertain a ceasefire marked a significant strategic move. The Trump administration responded by lifting the suspension on military aid, hoping to incentivize further negotiations. However, Russian President Vladimir Putin's reluctance to engage in substantial concessions quickly led to the collapse of the initial ceasefire.

Michael Crowley [06:16]: "Putin is not looking for the grand deal that Trump has in mind... Trump has been promising since he was a candidate for president."

5. Escalation of Frustration and Signs of Trump's Impatience

As Russian military actions intensified, including targeted strikes on Ukrainian cities, Trump's frustration became evident. A notable instance was his post on Truth Social following a major attack on Kyiv, demanding the peace deal be completed.

Michael Crowley [08:36]: "This is the strongest language we've ever seen from Trump up until this point."

Despite earlier defenses of Putin, Trump's subsequent remarks indicated a shift to blame Putin for the prolonged conflict.

6. Unexpected Meeting Between Trump and Zelensky

Amidst rising tensions, Trump and Zelensky had an unexpected one-on-one meeting during Pope Francis's funeral at the Vatican. The encounter was notably private, with photographs capturing the two leaders in a serious yet non-confrontational dialogue.

Michael Crowley [10:01]: "This picture of the two of them said so much... they were having a serious conversation."

7. The Mineral Deal and Trump's Diminishing Patience

Shortly after the Vatican meeting, the Trump administration secured a deal granting the U.S. access to Ukraine's critical minerals. While some viewed this as self-serving, Ukrainians saw it as beneficial, tying U.S. interests more closely to Ukraine's future. Meanwhile, Putin remained steadfast, continuing military operations without making significant concessions.

Michael Crowley [11:00]: "And something that's ominous for Vladimir Putin is... Trump again complains about Russian missile strikes... he decided he needs to talk to Putin..."

8. The Pivotal Call Between Trump and Putin

The culmination of these developments was a two-hour phone call between Presidents Trump and Putin. The disparity in their approaches was evident: Trump, with considerable media attention, called from the White House, while Putin, nonchalantly, called from a school in Sochi.

Michael Crowley [14:35]: "Putin did not announce the call... he seems to be squeezing it into his schedule."

During the call, Putin described the conversation as "informative and open," while Trump maintained a more optimistic outlook, though he expressed clear frustration.

Donald Trump [15:54]: "When are we going to end this bloodshed, this bloodbath? It's a bloodbath."

Despite Trump's effort to pin the onus on Putin, his remarks suggested a potential waning of his commitment to mediating peace.

Michael Crowley [16:25]: "It seems that he's reaching a point where he's ready to just wash his hands of both of them again."

9. Implications for U.S. Support to Ukraine

The uncertainty surrounding Trump's commitment poses significant questions about the future of U.S. support for Ukraine. While current assistance continues, the long-term sustainability, especially if the U.S. steps back, remains uncertain. Analysts warn that reduced support could weaken Ukraine's position against Russian advances.

Michael Crowley [18:00]: "The question is, what will happen a few weeks and months from now if Trump decides he wants to wash his hands of these negotiations?"

10. Trump's Negotiation Style and Global Perception

Michael Crowley delves into Trump's negotiation tactics, highlighting his penchant for deal-making, sometimes without substantial outcomes. Trump's public bravado contrasts with his more subdued and strategic interactions during actual negotiations.

Michael Crowley [19:45]: "One of them is that what animates Trump possibly more than anything else, is the desire to cut a deal."

This dynamic has left other global leaders observing closely, trying to discern Trump's true motivations and capabilities in international diplomacy.

11. Conclusion: The Stalemate and Future Prospects

The episode concludes with reflections on the ongoing stalemate. Trump's potential disengagement contrasts sharply with Putin's enduring commitment to the conflict, positioning Russia to possibly gain the upper hand should U.S. support diminish.

Rachel Abrams [23:23]: "It looks like that might be exactly what's happening."

The evolving situation underscores the complexities of international diplomacy and the unpredictable nature of leadership dynamics in times of conflict.

---

Notable Quotes:

• Michael Crowley [02:46]: "Trump declared that Ukraine was not ready for a peace deal... but accelerating his diplomacy with Moscow..."

• Michael Crowley [05:00]: "Ukraine agrees on March 11 to a US proposal for a 30 day ceasefire with Russia..."

• Michael Crowley [08:36]: "This is the strongest language we've ever seen from Trump up until this point."

• Donald Trump [15:54]: "When are we going to end this bloodshed, this bloodbath? It's a bloodbath."

• Michael Crowley [19:45]: "What animates Trump possibly more than anything else, is the desire to cut a deal."

---

This episode provides an in-depth analysis of the intricate dance between President Trump, President Putin, and President Zelensky, revealing the challenges and setbacks in mediating peace in Ukraine. It underscores the limitations of Trump's approach and the resilience of Russia's strategic objectives, painting a nuanced picture of international relations in a time of conflict.

Transcript

[Capital One]

This message comes from Capital One. Your business requires commercial banking solutions that prioritize your long term success with Capital One. Get a full suite of financial products and services tailored to meet your needs today and goals for tomorrow. Learn [e-mail] Commercial Member FDIC.

[Rachel Abrams]

From the New York Times, I'm Rachel Abrams and this is the Daily. President Trump once approached the challenge of ending Russia's war in Ukraine as a straight ahead deal, something that he could achieve easily. But after months of trying, he's signaling that he might actually walk away. Today, my colleague Michael Crowley on the phone call between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin and what it tells us about how the conflict could end. It's Wednesday, May 21st. Michael, nice to speak with you. I don't think we've ever met before.

[Michael Crowley]

I don't think we have. Thanks for having me.

[Rachel Abrams]

Yeah, our pleasure. So, Michael, we want to talk to you about this two hour phone call that happened between President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin that happened on Monday. But before we get there, we haven't really checked in on the war between Russia and Ukraine since that disastrous Oval Office meeting between President Trump and Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky. I want to understand what happened in between Trump and Zelensky kind of blowing up at each other and this call that was, I think, pretty remarkable in a few ways.

[Michael Crowley]

Yeah. Well, in some ways we are at a point that no one could have predicted back in February when Zelensky was essentially thrown out of the White House by Trump and, you know, it looked like Ukraine was cooked. Trump was very angry at Zelensky and very eager, by all indications, to please Russian President Vladimir Putin. But in the weeks since then, the story has become a little more complicated. There's some tension in the relationship between Trump and Putin that we've not seen before. Ukraine is certainly not out of the woods yet. But the path to this phone call was much more winding and filled with surprises, I think, than anyone would have expected on that day when Trump essentially berated the president of Ukraine and acted as though he was finished doing business with him.

[Rachel Abrams]

Let's start at the beginning of that winding road. What was the immediate fallout from that meeting?

[Michael Crowley]

Well, Ukrainians and their supporters in Europe and the United States were basically panicking after that meeting. You know, Trump declared that Ukraine was not ready for a peace deal, a deal he promised as a candidate that he could strike in as little as one day, and suspended US Military aid and intelligence sharing with Ukraine. His attitude was, you, Zelensky, are not showing enough respect to the United States and not willing enough to cut a deal. And we're done with you. Good day and good luck. And, you know, what was happening was not only was Trump castigating Zelensky and to many people, blaming the victim of this Russian invasion, but accelerating his diplomacy with Moscow and talking about, you know, economic deals and potentially lifting sanctions and restoring normal diplomatic relations and seeming to get very excited about this prospect that America and Russia would be friends.

[Rachel Abrams]

So how did President Zelensky respond to all of this at the time?

[Michael Crowley]

You know, I think a couple of things happened. Number one, I think the Ukrainians changed their tone. Zelensky was much more careful about what he said about the US and the Trump administration in public. At the same time, behind the scenes, you had some European leaders acting as what one longtime Russia, Ukraine expert said to me was acting as marriage counselors between President Trump and the Ukrainian government. And, you know, Trump has no great love for much of Western Europe in particular, but he will listen to the British Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, Emmanuel Macron of France, and they did a lot of work behind the scenes to try to reason with Trump and present the Ukrainian position to him, and also, I think, to talk to Zelensky and Ukrainians about how to interface with the US Government in a way that was going to put them in better standing in the White House than Zelenskyy was on that painful day.

[Rachel Abrams]

And so what happened then?

[Michael Crowley]

So one thing that happens is that Zelensky and Ukraine very cleverly shift their posture. They start showing a real openness to some sort of a deal with Russia. You know, this is something that they had rejected for years, but I think that they realize that what Trump wants more than anything is some deal, any deal, where he can proclaim a victory. So Ukraine agrees on March 11 to a US proposal for a 30 day ceasefire with Russia, and the Trump administration rewards Ukraine for this agreement by lifting its suspension of military aid and intelligence sharing. Vladimir Putin will not agree to an unconditional ceasefire and accepts a very, very limited deal which falls apart quickly. And I think that's an early disappointment for Trump. I think it starts to dawn on Trump in the following days and weeks that Putin is not looking for the grand deal that Trump has in mind and that Trump has been promising since he was a candidate for president.

[Rachel Abrams]

So it sounds like Zelensky in saying, sure, I'm open to a deal, kind of put the onus on Putin, and in so doing exposed Putin as being much less willing to negotiate, that Trump may have expected or wanted like, it sounds quite shrewd on the part of Zelensky is what I'm getting at.

[Michael Crowley]

No, it's exactly right. You might call it a kind of a pull the chair strategy. Putin has talked as though he is open to peace for a long time.

[Rachel Abrams]

He's strung Trump along.

[Michael Crowley]

He strung Trump along. He strung the world along for years. And, you know, something that Biden administration officials would always say is Putin is not serious about negotiating a peace deal. Putin wants victory. He wants huge gains that the Ukrainians can never accept. But now, with the arrival of Trump, who is actually pressing this and very much wants to engineer a deal, he's finally called Putin's bluff in a way that no one else has. And Zelensky has very shrewdly created the dynamics for that to happen.

[Rachel Abrams]

So what happens after Trump starts getting angry at Putin?

[Michael Crowley]

Well, by late March, you see some of the first signs of Trump's frustration with Putin. And in one interview, he says he's very angry and even pissed off at comments Putin has made about Zelensky, saying that they're not helping the peace process. And he talks about increasing sanctions on Russia. But Putin is undeterred. As the weeks go by, he's bombing and striking Ukrainian cities, hitting civilian targets with drones and missiles, and, you know, there's worldwide outrage. That finally even includes President Trump, who on April 24 posts on his Truth Social account, vladimir, stop. Not necessary and very bad timing. In response to a major Russian attack on Kiev, he says, let's get the peace deal done in all capital letters. So, you know, this is really a kind of a cred from Trump. You can really sense his frustration. You know, you're screwing up my deal here. Vladimir, what's going on? I thought we were friends.

[Rachel Abrams]

Am I correct in saying that this is, like the strongest language we've ever seen from Trump up until this point?

[Michael Crowley]

You are. You are. And not only is it the strongest language, but it's such a departure from the way he has always talked about Putin, which is to make excuses for him, or, you know, when he's asked about Putin assassinating political opponents, he says, well, lots of people do that. So it's not only that he hasn't directly criticized Putin in this way before, it's that he's contorted himself to find ways to defend and excuse Putin. But what happens next, in some ways, is even more surprising. On April 26, at the funeral for Pope Francis at the Vatican, Trump has his first meeting with Zelensky since the debacle in the Oval office. And this is sort of an impromptu pull aside. We don't know that much about it, but all the vibes, you might say, were very positive. And, you know, the kind of defining aspect of what we know about it is a photograph that was published showing just Trump and Zelenskyy one on one in some large marble hall somewhere in the Vatican, sitting in two chairs, facing each other, almost with their knees touching, locked in a very intense conversation.

[Rachel Abrams]

I remember seeing the photos. It was really stunning.

[Michael Crowley]

It was. It was theatrical. And, you know, you don't want to read too much into one photograph, but this picture of the two of them said so much. There was no retinue of staffers around them. There was no media. And you could tell that they were having a serious conversation. And it was not angry. It looked intense, but not angry. And so, you know, here Trump is willing to sit down with Zelenskyy one on one, grant him that legitimacy. And, you know, this is seen as a very encouraging sign for Ukraine supporters. But even more encouraging is the fact that just a few days later, on April 30, the Trump administration inks a deal with Ukraine that gives America access to Ukraine's critical minerals. And although some people worry that this is some effort by Trump to rip Ukraine off, Ukrainians are actually supportive of this because they feel that this gives Trump an investment in the future of their country that he did not have before. So suddenly, Trump is doing deals with the Ukrainians. And where is Vladimir Putin? He is still holding out, not making concessions, not doing significant deals. And Trump is losing more and more patience. And something that's ominous for Vladimir Putin is on the same day he sees Zelensky at the Vatican, he again complains about Russian missile strikes into civilian areas of Ukraine and says that these attacks make him wonder whether Putin actually doesn't want to stop the war, and that he's just, as Trump says it in kind of an odd terminology, just tapping me along. And at this point, Trump decides he needs to talk to Putin, and he arranges a call with the Russian leader. And all these weeks of gamesmanship, maneuvering, and roiling frustration seems to be culminating in this one essential conversation. And to hear Trump tell it, this call with Vladimir Putin could determine whether he is willing to continue trying to mediate an end to this war.

[Rachel Abrams]

We'll be right back.

[Emily Badger]

I'm Emily Badger. I'm a reporter with the New York Times. Since the pandemic, empty office buildings have become much more common in many cities. Why can't we just turn them into housing. It's actually a really complicated question. To answer this question, you have to find a developer trying to turn an office building into apartments, ride a rickety elevator to the 30th floor of a construction site to see the interior guts of a building, finds an expert in incandescent light bulbs who can explain to you how they fundamentally change office buildings. And that's just the beginning of what you have to do. When you subscribe to the New York Times, you are sending reporters like me out into the world to ask questions of dozens of different experts, to go and visit places most people don't get to go to, try to come back with answers, and then turn all of that into something that anyone can understand. If you'd like to become a subscriber, head to nytimes.com subscribe. You need to see the animated floor plans in this piece.

[Rachel Abrams]

So, Michael, after all of this buildup, all of this anticipation, what actually happened on the call between Putin and Trump?

[Michael Crowley]

So 10am comes on Monday for this highly anticipated call, and the two leaders are treating it very differently. For Trump, there's been all this fanfare and buildup on social media and his comments to reporters and comments from other administration officials. And he does the call from the White House. Putin does the call from a school on the Sochi coast. He's not even at the Kremlin. He's not even in Moscow.

[Rachel Abrams]

He didn't even announce it.

[Michael Crowley]

He didn't announce it. And it, you know, he seems to be kind of squeezing it into his schedule. For Putin, this is not the defining event of the week. And I think that symbolizes the mismatch in expectations or really a mismatch in substance. And you saw that in the way both men described this call after the fact. You know, Putin said it was informative and open and that he told Trump he would work on a, what he called a memorandum for future peace talks, but he didn't agree to a ceasefire of any kind. He didn't make any new concessions. He certainly didn't present the call as some breakthrough or new stage of the process.

[Donald Trump]

Well, thank you very much, everybody.

[Michael Crowley]

It's Trump's version was a bit more upbeat, and he did tell journalists afterward that he is still hopeful for a deal.

[Donald Trump]

There's a good chance we can get this done. I believe Putin wants to do it now, if I thought Putin didn't want, I mean, that's what I do. My whole life is like, deals, one big deal.

[Michael Crowley]

But he clearly puts the onus on Putin.

[Donald Trump]

I said, when Are we going to end this, Vladimir? I know him for a long time now. I said, when are we going to end this bloodshed, this bloodbath? It's a bloodbath.

[Michael Crowley]

Trump was blaming Putin again for how long this has gone on. And, you know, he straight up asks Putin, when is this war going to end? He's clearly frustrated or maybe disappointed that Putin has not changed his position. But it's not particularly angry or threatening.

[Donald Trump]

Big egos involved, I tell you, big egos involved. But I think something's going to happen.

[Michael Crowley]

You get the sense that Trump has reached his own limits.

[Donald Trump]

And I did say, also, if I thought that you couldn't do it, I'd step away, because what are you going to do?

[Michael Crowley]

It seems that he's reaching a point where he's ready to just wash his hands of both of them again.

[Donald Trump]

This was a European situation. It should have remained a European situation.

[Michael Crowley]

You know, he says that maybe others could help out, but that it just might not be worth it to try to make this deal.

[Donald Trump]

And thank you all very much. Thank you.

[Rachel Abrams]

Wow. Wait, so does that mean that after all this time, after Trump pledging to end the war, after Trump trying to bring these two sides to the table, does that mean that the US Is out? Like, does that mean that Trump is saying, like, I give up?

[Michael Crowley]

Well, it's always hard to know with Trump. You know, that would seem to be the implication. On the other hand, Trump has invested a lot of time and a fair amount of political capital into this process, and he's come up completely empty handed. He. So, you know, is he really serious? Is he really ready to walk away? And even if he does, that raises an entirely new set of questions about where he goes from here.

[Rachel Abrams]

What would it mean for Ukraine, though, if the United States did just say, okay, we're done with this, Like, I'm unclear. Are we still giving them weapons? Like, are we still supporting them in some way?

[Michael Crowley]

Well, the US Continues to provide Ukraine with some assistance that was previously approved by Congress under the Biden administration and continues to provide intelligence sharing to Ukraine, which is really, really important because we have such a sophisticated intelligence infrastructure. So this means, among other things, you know, our satellites, which can see Russian positions and other sources of intelligence we have on Russia's military plans and operations hugely important to Ukraine. The question is, what will happen a few weeks and months from now if Trump decides he wants to wash his hands of these negotiations? Would he cut off the intelligence assistance? Will he, in his budget request to Congress, ask for more support for Ukraine, either military or economic. And if not, to what degree could Europe fill the gap? You know, most analysts say that Europe can do a fair amount, but not enough to prevent Ukraine's position from being severely weakened over time. And this, by the way, is exactly why many people believe this is what Putin has wanted all along, for Trump to grow impatient, to give up, to walk away. And that gives Russia a major military advantage, and Putin can just take what he wants eventually.

[Rachel Abrams]

How should we think about the way that Trump relates to other superpower rivals at this stage in his second term? Like how he both tries to make deals with them, but also how he tries to pressure them?

[Michael Crowley]

Look, I think that every world leader is watching this process and trying to figure out how Trump operates. But I think that this Ukraine saga has reinforced some constants with Donald Trump that world leaders will be paying very close attention to. One of them is that what animates Trump possibly more than anything else, is the desire to cut a deal. And sometimes it may not even be a very real deal. It may be something that he's able to call a great deal deal that doesn't have a lot of substance to it. And so you've seen both Zelensky and Putin play to that. I also think that this shows that Trump can be a very intimidating bully, particularly on social media or in press conferences with reporters. But what happened when he was face to face or on the phone with those guys, he didn't threaten him. He didn't bluster and bully by any account. And I think what that tells you is that Trump says a lot of things for public consumption. He likes to posture a lot and talk tough. But ultimately, and particularly if it's in the service of cutting a deal, it doesn't mean that that's where his head is really at or that he's going to let those resentments get in the way of what he perceives to be his tactical interest at any given moment.

[Rachel Abrams]

I just sort of wonder if this whole saga so far, Trump going from optimism to anger to maybe apathy with some other motions in between, with no change in outcome, Putin has remained, has remained the same in what he wants this entire time. And so I just sort of wonder if this whole evolution has just showed us that Trump is learning that he cannot pressure or sweet talk or make a deal out of this problem. Like what people said about the stock market, right? He cannot bully the stock market into giving what he wants, and he cannot pressure Putin into giving him what he wants.

[Michael Crowley]

I think that's right. Now, I'VE heard people say that Trump came into this second term riding higher, feeling stronger. He had been around the block once before as president, and he may have thought he could come in and get things done really fast in a way that he couldn't do in his first term. But the world is a really complicated, difficult place. And dealing with Vladimir Putin, any experienced diplomat will tell you, is one of the great challenges in foreign affairs. And I'm sometimes reminded of a saying that is attributed to the Taliban in Afghanistan, when the US spent 20 years trying to out fight the Taliban and defeat them. And the saying was, you have the watches, but we have the time.

[Rachel Abrams]

Hmm.

[Michael Crowley]

And the idea behind that was, you may be more technologically sophisticated, more advanced, more powerful, but we can just wait you out. We're here and we're not going anywhere. And I think that, you know, that partly explains how Vladimir Putin sees this. He's gotta get through this sort of quaint little adventure of the American president who wants a nice deal, but he's playing a much longer game. And he may have calculated that Trump will get frustrated and storm off. And at the moment, it looks like that might be exactly what's happening.

[Rachel Abrams]

Michael, thank you so much.

[Michael Crowley]

Thank you.

[Rachel Abrams]

We'll be right back.

[Michael Crowley]

The New York Times app has all this stuff that you may not have seen.

[New York Times User]

The way the tabs are at the top with all of the different sections.

[Michael Crowley]

I can immediately navigate to something that matches what I'm feeling.

[New York Times User]

I go to games, always doing the.

[Michael Crowley]

Mini, doing the wordle.

[New York Times User]

I loved how much content. It exposed me to things that I never would have thought to turn to a news app for this app is essential.

[Rachel Abrams]

The New York Times app. All of the times, all in one place. Download it [e-mail] app here's what else you need to know today. On Tuesday, a federal judge in Boston said that the Trump administration apparently had violated an order he issued by flying a Burmese immigrant to South Sudan without further first giving him enough time to challenge his removal. Judge Brian Murphy ordered a government lawyer to find out exactly where the plane was and whether it could be turned around mid flight. He also warned that everyone involved in the flight could face criminal contempt sanctions. Lawyers for the Burmese migrant said that a man from Vietnam was also deported on the same plane, a claim that the Justice Department lawyers would not confirm. And it was not clear how many other migrants were on the plane or what their home countries were. The judge's original ruling from April ordered the administration not to deport migrants to countries other than their own without first giving them 15 days notice to raise concerns. And Canada, Britain and France have sharply condemned Israel for its proposed plans to escalate the war in Gaza, calling them, quote, disproportionate and egregious. Regis the joint statement follows a threat from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to take control of Gaza at a time when the United nations is warning that the population faces an imminent famine. Today's episode was produced by Shannon Lynn, Anna Foley and Jessica Chung, with help from Carlos Prieto. It was edited by Patricia Willans and Maria Byrne, contains original music by Diane Wong and Dan Powell and was engineered by Chris Wood. Our theme music is by Jim Brunberg and Ben Landsberg of Wonderly. Special thanks to Anton Troynowski. That's it for the Daily I'm Rachel Abrams. See you tomorrow.