
During President Trump’s first term, the intentional separation of migrant child from their parents shocked the country and persuaded Mr. Trump to say he would end the practice for good. Hamed Aleaziz, who covers immigration policy for The Times, has found that in Mr. Trump’s second term, the practice has returned.
Loading summary
Kate Kelly
Brought to you by the Capital One Savor Card. With Savor, you earn unlimited 3% cash back on dining, entertainment, and at grocery stores. That's unlimited cash back on ordering takeout from home or unlimited cash back on tickets to concerts and games. So grab a bite, grab a seat. And earn unlimited 3% cash back with the saver card Capital One. What's in your wallet? Terms apply. See capitalone.com for details.
Michael Barbaro
From the New York Times, I'm Michael Balbaro. This is the Daily. During President Trump's first term, the intentional separation of migrant children from their parents shocked the country and persuaded Trump to say that he would end the practice for good. But my colleague Hamid Ali Aziz has found that in Trump's second term, family separations are back. It's Thursday, August 7th.
Hamid Ali Aziz
Hi, this is the New York Times.
Evgenia
Yes, I'm here with the subject you requested, sir.
Hamid Ali Aziz
Okay, fantastic. Let me get my translator on the call.
Michael Barbaro
I wonder if you can tell us about this family that you have been talking to.
Hamid Ali Aziz
Yeah, I've been speaking with this Russian couple, Evgenia and Evgeny, for the past month. Okay. Are you here? Is everybody here? Hello?
Evgenia
Okay, wonderful.
Hamid Ali Aziz
They're in their 30s, they're from the Russian city of Volgograd, and they have this 8 year old child, Maxim. I guess I'd like to start, you know, why come? Why did you want to come to America? And Evgenia, walk me through their family's journey. They fled Russia because of their political activism. They were supporters of Alexei Navalny.
Evgenia
We were on their watch list, and that made it impossible to stay in our country.
Hamid Ali Aziz
And they went to Mexico.
Evgenia
There was a program in place which was called CBP1. And we were waiting for about 10 months while in Mexico.
Hamid Ali Aziz
And their desire was to get an appointment through this app that the Biden administration had created, which allowed people to come to a port of entry, enter the United States, and seek asylum within the country.
Michael Barbaro
Right. And I'm guessing based on what you said, that they were seeking political asylum based on this adversarial relationship they had with the Putin government?
Hamid Ali Aziz
Definitely. They say they were fleeing for their lives. But while they're waiting, President Trump is elected and he closes down CBP1, and on January 20th, it's gone.
Michael Barbaro
So what happens to them with this app? Gone.
Hamid Ali Aziz
So they realize that there's no way to enter the United States in the way that they had imagined. So they get inside of a car with two other Russian families and they go to a port of entry.
Evgenia
We immediately informed that all of the People who were in the car are seeking to apply for the political asylum.
Hamid Ali Aziz
And says they're there to seek asylum. But because the Trump administration has shut down asylum at the southern border wholly and completely, those options are not available to them. And they are detained in Border Patrol custody.
Michael Barbaro
So every attempt that they've made to enter the country legally has failed. And now they are in the US in the eyes of the Trump administration, illegally.
Hamid Ali Aziz
Yeah. Their order deported very quickly. And the government wants to enforce this deportation order and get them out of the country.
Michael Barbaro
Got it. So what happens once that deportation order is issued?
Hamid Ali Aziz
Afghania says that in mid May, after they had already spent two weeks in Border Patrol custody, they were taken from Border Patrol detention to JFK airport.
Evgenia
And then the following day they were trying to deport us.
Hamid Ali Aziz
And it's there where Evgenia and Evgeny realize that they are being deported to Russia, which is something that in their eyes is just impossible. It's something that cannot happen because of the fear and the threats that they face back in Russia. So you have this situation where in Afghanistan's eyes, when she's in JFK airport, she's nervous, she's fearful of what deportation means back to her home country, and she sees her husband pleading with the ICE officials to stop their deportation.
Evgenia
We very reasonably explained our position and explained that we're not going to fly anywhere.
Michael Barbaro
Right. Potentially, it's life or death for them.
Hamid Ali Aziz
Exactly. Yeah, it is life or death for them. And it's at this point inside the airport where they are first told of this idea that since they're refusing their deportation, they will be separated from their eight year old boy, Maxime, who will go into government custody.
Michael Barbaro
Just explain that. What exactly are they being told and what rationale is being given?
Hamid Ali Aziz
Yeah. So they're taken to a room inside jfk and it's there where Evgenia believes that since they've refused this deportation, they're going to be separated from their child for a day or two. But you have these really intense scenes.
Evgenia
Well, at first I was actually holding up pretty well, but then I started to cry. And when I started to cry, he picked up and he started to cry too.
Hamid Ali Aziz
Maxim is looking at his parents. He's confirming with them that it'll only take a few days. At one point, Evgenia says that her last image of her son is her crying and being told to leave this room and her looking back at her son and seeing that he was also crying, but he had kind of faced his head in a different direction. And that was the lasting image that she still has in her mind of the last time that she saw her son. And from there, Maxime is taken to HHS custody, where he's taken to a child's shelter and the parents are taken to ICE detention. Well, what.
Michael Barbaro
What happened to what they understood to be a very short term separation?
Hamid Ali Aziz
It wasn't short term. It continues. The separation continues. And in the days and weeks after their initial separation, Evgenia is talking to Maxim on the phone.
Evgenia
He said that he's sleeping in the same room with children who don't speak English and they don't speak Russian, and he doesn't understand them at all.
Hamid Ali Aziz
He's in a shelter for unaccompanied immigrant children. And she recalls how it was difficult to actually have this conversation with their son because he was crying so much. He was just relentlessly crying. Maxim is asking his mother, when are you getting me out of here? You know, when are you going to come get me?
Evgenia
He said, mama, when are you going to take me out of here?
Hamid Ali Aziz
And his mother says, we're working on it. We'll make it happen.
Evgenia
I was trying to explain to him that we are trying. We're trying to do that. We're talking to the officers, we're trying to convince them.
Hamid Ali Aziz
But of course, she knows. She has no understanding whether that's realistic.
Michael Barbaro
Well, what is she being told? What are the border immigration officials telling her and her husband about her son and whether they're going to be reunited?
Hamid Ali Aziz
Nothing. They have no sense of whether or not they'll be reunified with their child. Their attorney actually had requested from the Trump administration, administration to detain the family together in an ICE detention center in Texas, but that request was not granted.
Michael Barbaro
So, Hamid, what exactly do you come to understand has happened to this family and why they end up in this pretty tortured state of limbo and quite obviously separation? These parents are no longer with their quite young son.
Hamid Ali Aziz
Well, what I came to understand through weeks of investigation, combing through case files and internal documents was that this family was the face of family separation in this new form during the second Trump administration.
Michael Barbaro
We'll be right back. Don't just imagine a better future. Start investing in one with betterment, whether it's saving for today or building wealth for tomorrow. We help people in small businesses put their money to work. We automate to make saving simpler. We optimize to make investing smarter. We build innovative technology backed by financial experts. For anyone who's ever said, I think I can do better, so be invested in yourself, Be invested in your business. Be invested in better with betterment. Get started@betterment.com investing involves risk performance not guaranteed.
Kate Kelly
I'm Kate Kelly. I'm an investigative correspondent covering money and influence for the New York Times. I remember a story that I worked on. There was a conspiracy theory about this event. At the time, I thought, that can't be true. That seems extreme. So I went about the reporting. I did a whole ton of interviews and I wrote a draft of the story. But there was a little part of me that thought, you don't quite have this. So I went back out and did some more reporting, digging into that little piece that was bugging me. And it turned out the conspiracists were essentially right because I had that extra time. And I was willing to be surprised. I think I got the right story and was able to deliver that to our readers. So I'm really grateful that that open mindedness is there in me, but is also shot through our institution where the editor will say, yeah, take another two weeks and get it right. If this kind of independent journalism is important to you, you can support it and the coverage that I do by subscribing to the new.
Michael Barbaro
Hamid. You call this a new form of family separation? And of course, the initial form of family separation ended up being a defining chapter of the first Trump administration. But what's different about these family separations from the family separations of the first Trump administration? And what's similar? I guess we may need to go back to the first version of it.
Hamid Ali Aziz
Yeah. If you can recall, back during the first Trump administration in 2018, the Department of Justice, working with the Department of Homeland Security, enacts this policy where anybody crossing the border illegally was going to be charged with illegal entry. And that included families as well. And as a result of that prosecution, thousands of families were separated. And the whole idea behind these family separations, you know, taking the children from the families, was to deter families from trying to cross into the country illegally. This was something that the Trump administration had struggled with, that families were crossing the border illegally and then ultimately being released into the country. And they saw it as this pull factor, this idea that families knew that if they crossed into the United States, they had a free ticket into the country, and this was their solution to stop that.
Michael Barbaro
Right. But the outcry from the public, once the Times broke the story that these separations were happening was extraordinary.
Hamid Ali Aziz
Yeah, definitely. There were protests.
Michael Barbaro
Tens of thousands marched across the country over immigration.
Hamid Ali Aziz
The Pope called it immoral. You had this audio of a Young girl crying for her parents that went viral. All these different scenes that really cut through, in a way, with the American public turning against this policy.
Michael Barbaro
We all should be able to agree that in the United States of America, we will not intentionally separate children from their parents.
Hamid Ali Aziz
We will not do that. We are better than that. And ultimately, it went to court. The ACLU was able to get a judge to block these separations outside of very specific scenarios. And President Trump ultimately says, okay, we won't do this anymore. Around the same time in the summer of 2018.
Michael Barbaro
Right. It was one of the few policies that he genuinely reversed himself on, as I recall. He signs an executive order and very publicly says, I am not going to do this. People are saying, this is terrible. I hear you. So why would the second Trump administration bring any version of this back?
Hamid Ali Aziz
Well, the Trump administration has said that there is no family separation policy, that they do not separate families, that there's nothing new happening here. But I've been looking through documents and interviewing families like Evgenia and Evgenia, and what I found is that there have been at least nine families in similar situations, families that have refused to be deported to their home countries for reasons obviously like. And when they've refused, when they've decided not to get on these planes to be deported, it's at that point that the government is separating these families.
Michael Barbaro
And why can't the US Just force these families to get on these planes and leave if there is a deportation order?
Hamid Ali Aziz
There are certain countries that ICE has had difficulty to deport to regularly, and one of those countries is Russia. Obviously, there. There are not the greatest of relations between Russia and the United States. And as a result, ICE has to deport Russians primarily through commercial airports and put them on planes and as opposed to a charter flight that ICE is administering where they can shackle them and arrest them and handcuff them and put them on the plane. The situation on airplanes is different. And if people refuse to board or make a scene, airlines will not take them. And so ultimately, what the Trump administration is trying to do here is to separate them for their refusal and continue to try to deport them. And in their eyes, they believe that it's a different policy, that it's actually happening not at the southern border, but inside the United States.
Michael Barbaro
Well, why does that distinction matter where the separation is occurring? And I guess that makes me wonder, how does it relate to the court rulings about that initial form of separation?
Hamid Ali Aziz
Yeah, the court order in 2018 applied to separations specifically at the southern border Again, these families that are crossing and as a result, are being separated due to these prosecutions. And so the court order blocks the separations of the southern border outside of a few different scenarios. You know, somebody's a national security threat, a public safety threat, or a danger to their children. In those circumstances, there can be separations, but otherwise, there cannot be. But internally, inside ice, they view these separations as a different form of separation. We found a case file, in fact, in one of these cases, where they say there is no court ramifications or implications here and that it's a different form of separation. It's a interior separation. Hmm.
Michael Barbaro
So because the location of a separation in the country's interior, not at the border, is defining this new kind of family separation, the administration is saying that it's within the bounds of the law.
Hamid Ali Aziz
Exactly. That is the way they discuss it internally.
Michael Barbaro
Okay, so they do acknowledge these separations are happening?
Hamid Ali Aziz
Well, it is a strange kind of roundabout way of confirming it. They say they do not do family separation, but then they say that due to the family's behaviors and refusing to comply with this deportation order, HHS took custody of the children, which, of course, is a form of the family being separated, since the child is going from the parents to HHS custody. And, of course, in the internal records, there's the documentation of these separations. Ultimately, this separation really serves as an accelerant for these families to decide to leave the country, because, you know, you can imagine when given the obvious choice of being separated from their child or leaving together as a unit, it's a very compelling argument to give in and to leave the country.
Michael Barbaro
What this would seem to suggest is that the impulse to separate migrant families has never really gone away inside the Trump administration. And yet this second version that you have found in your reporting only applied so far to nine families. And I wonder what you make of that. I mean, that is significantly, significantly smaller than the thousands of families that went through family separation in the first term at the border.
Hamid Ali Aziz
Yeah. I have found evidence of this happening to nine families. Of course, there could be more. I mean, it's important to know that I don't have the number of families that were faced with this choice and ultimately decided to leave the United States.
Michael Barbaro
Right, because you're focused on the families that have decided to stay.
Hamid Ali Aziz
Yeah, I mean, I think right now ICE is under incredible pressure to boost their deportation numbers. They've gone through firings of leadership. They've been told to arrest 3,000 people a day. The pressure has been relentless. And in these situations. They are not going to allow families that simply refuse to get on deportation flights to have the ability to be released into the country and to live their lives and go through court proceedings. That is not an option that's going to be afforded to them simply because they refuse to be deported. Ultimately, they will continue to try to deport them and as a result of their refusal, years or they will be separated.
Michael Barbaro
I think that brings us back to the family that you spent so much time talking to from Russia. They have not given in to this pressure to leave. And so what does that say about the power of this as a deterrent and what awaits this family if they remain separated?
Hamid Ali Aziz
I think it just speaks to how scared they were to be removed to Russia. That, you know, like they've said repeatedly, this was just not a possibility that they could even imagine happening to them. They were not going to allow it. And they've experienced this separation now for more than two months. Wow. And they have not given in. They have not said, we will be deported. And ultimately, they have continued to close claim fear of Russia. And as a result, finally they were given a screening, you know, trying to determine whether or not their fear level passed the government's threshold of being a legitimate fear level of being harmed in their home country. And they passed that very high bar that was given to them. They passed that, and now the government cannot deport this family to Russia.
Michael Barbaro
Yeah. Which would suggest that their original claims that they deserve political asylum in the US Contain some level of credibility.
Hamid Ali Aziz
Yeah. But at this point, the Trump administration has blocked the avenues for asylum. So all that's remaining for them is this tiny sliver of a chance that they can avoid deportation to Russia. But at the end of the day, it does not mean that they will potentially stay in the United States. And it could result in them ultimately being moved to a third country.
Michael Barbaro
In the meantime, what has happened to Maxime to this eight year old boy?
Hamid Ali Aziz
Well, he has since been transferred to foster care and he's able to regularly speak to his parents on the phone. And during these conversations, his father, Evgeny, told me that he tries to keep his son's mind off of this grueling separation.
Evgenia
I was asking about friends, I was asking what interesting things he'd seen or experienced.
Hamid Ali Aziz
And he asked some questions, you know, like, what are some of his favorite things to eat? What has he done? And one of the questions that he's asked him is.
Evgenia
What are your favorite things to do?
Hamid Ali Aziz
What are your favorite things to do? You know, in America? What are you, what are you doing? And his son responded, well, my favorite thing to do is to speak with you. And you know, my mother and his, his father said, okay, what's your second favorite thing to do?
Evgenia
And he says, the conversation with you.
Hamid Ali Aziz
My second favorite thing to do is to speak with you alone. And his father says, what's your third favorite thing to do? And he says, conversation with mama. My third favorite thing to do is to speak with my mother alone. So you can see obviously through this answer how focused he is on his parents. And he's recently grown despondent, according to his mother who said that, you know, he had been consistently counting the days that they had been separated from one another since May.
Evgenia
And he actually stopped doing this because he feels apathetic at this point, I think.
Hamid Ali Aziz
And recently he stopped counting and he told his mother on the phone that, you know, what was the point of counting the days they'd been separated? There didn't seem to be any prospect of them being together again.
Michael Barbaro
I mean, he sounds like an 8 year old boy who desperately needs a hug from his mom and his dad, definitely.
Hamid Ali Aziz
And his father has been thinking about the fact that his son is going to turn nine on August 24th.
Evgenia
And on that day, that will be the worst birthday in his life.
Hamid Ali Aziz
He's going to experience this birthday separate from his mother and father.
Evgenia
And I hope that it will not repeat ever again in his life.
Hamid Ali Aziz
His father said that he hopes that this is the only, only time that he has a birthday away from his parents.
Michael Barbaro
Muhammad, thank you very much. We appreciate it.
Hamid Ali Aziz
Thank you for having me.
Michael Barbaro
We'll be right back. We are living in interesting times, a turning point in history. Are we entering a dark authoritarian era or are we on the brink of a technological golden age or the apocalypse? No one really knows, but I'm trying to find out from New York Times opinion. I'm Ross Douthat and on my show, Interesting Times, exploring this strange new world order with the thinkers and leaders giving it shape. Follow it wherever you get your podcasts. Here's what else you need to know today. President Trump all but declared economic war against India on Wednesday, threatening tariffs of up to 50% against what many view as an ally. After announcing 25% tariffs on Indian imports last week, Trump has now tacked on another 25% to punish India for purchasing large amounts of Russian oil at a time when the United States is trying to force Russia to end its war in Ukraine. Meanwhile, President Trump said he would meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin as soon as next week. For what would be the the first in person summit between the leaders of both countries since Russia invaded Ukraine three years ago. The meeting reflects Trump's belief that a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine can only be achieved through his personal persuasion. Today's episode was produced by Carlos Prieto, Claire Tennisketter and Shannon Lynn. It was edited by Rachel Quester and Devin Taylor. Contains original music by Alicia Ba? Itu, Dan Powell, Pat McCusker and Rowan Namisto, and was engineered by Alyssa Moxley. Our theme music is by Jim Runberg and Ben Landsforth of Wonderland. That's it for the Daily I'm Michael Barbaro. See you tomorrow.
Hamid Ali Aziz
Foreign.
Michael Barbaro
And now a next level moment from ATT Business. Say you've sent out a gigantic shipment of pillows and they need to be there in time for International Sleep day. You've got AT and T5G so you're fully confident, but the vendor isn't responding. And International Sleep Day is tomorrow. Luckily, AT&T 5G lets you deal with any issues with ease, so the pillows will get delivered and everyone can sleep soundly, especially you. ATT 5G requires a compatible plan and device coverage not available everywhere. Learn more@att.com 5D Network.
Podcast Summary: "Trump Said Family Separations Would End. They’re Happening Again."
Podcast Information:
Episode Details:
In this gripping episode of The Daily, host Michael Barbaro delves into the resurgence of family separations under President Donald Trump’s second term. Despite promises to end the controversial practice during his first administration, investigative journalist Hamid Ali Aziz uncovers that family separations are resurfacing, affecting vulnerable immigrant families seeking asylum in the United States.
[00:26] Michael Barbaro introduces the topic by referencing the shock caused by the intentional separation of migrant children from their parents during Trump’s first term. Aziz’s investigation reveals that similar separations are occurring again under the second term.
Aziz shares the harrowing story of Evgenia and Evgeny, a Russian couple from Volgograd, and their 8-year-old son, Maxim.
Background and Asylum Seekers:
Journey to the United States:
Policy Shift and Closure of CBP1:
Deportation Process:
Refusal and Separation:
Separation Dynamics:
Prolonged Separation:
Aziz reveals that this is not an isolated incident but part of a broader, albeit limited, resurgence of family separations under the second Trump administration.
New Form of Separation:
Legal Distinctions:
Limited but Significant Cases:
Continued Deterrence and Legal Barriers:
The Plight of Maxim:
The episode underscores the persistent and evolving nature of family separations under restrictive immigration policies. While the scale appears smaller compared to the first administration’s practices, the psychological and emotional toll on affected families remains severe.
Systemic Pressures:
Asylum Pathways Blocked:
Final Reflections:
Notable Quotes:
Conclusion: This Daily episode powerfully illustrates the resurgence of family separations under President Trump’s second administration, highlighting the continued struggles of asylum-seeking families and the profound emotional distress caused by prolonged separations. Through the poignant story of Evgenia, Evgeny, and Maxim, the podcast sheds light on the human impact of immigration policies and the enduring challenges faced by those seeking refuge in the United States.