Ryan Holiday (22:11)
With the Stoic school descending from the Cynic school, there's obviously a lot of overlap. There's a big similarity between the two schools. I think the big place they overlap is this idea of freedom. Freedom not in the legal Sense, but freedom from the things that enslave most of us. Diogenes talked about people being slaves three times over. He meant sex or gluttony or sleep. Seneca, coming a couple hundred years after Diogenes talked about, he says, show me somebody who isn't a slave. He was talking about powerful people who are slaves to ambition, to their mistresses, to a computer compulsion to money, to fear, to work, whatever it is. And so they might have been on paper much more powerful than someone like Diogenes or Epictetus. But if you actually look at their lives, their day to day existence, they're actually not in control, they are actually powerless. Seneca would talk about this one Roman general, he says, you know, he commanded armies, but ambition commanded him. And so we come back to this, you know, idea of Diogenes. Who's more powerful, Diogenes or Alexander the Great? Now, of course, the Cynics go a lot further than the Stoics in terms of achieving this freedom. You know, getting rid of almost everything they own, reducing their desires to nothing. I don't know how practical or realistic that is for most of us, but I think there still is a lesson here that basically the more you want, the more you need, the more you are vulnerable, the more you are not under your own power. And this is not just true for, you know, sort of material things, but also desires and urges and passions. Now, another crossover between the Stoics and the Cynics is this idea of treating the body rigorously. Now, we might think of Diogenes sort of living on the streets as some kind of weakling, but he's kind of seeing this as like an athletic feat, like how little does he need, how tough can he be, how exposed can he be to the elements? What can he endure? And so for Diogenes, he's thinking about training and pushing the body, and in pushing the body, also pushing the mind and vice versa. He saw that health and strength are both essential for the philosopher. You know, today we think of philosophers as sort of sitting in a, in an ivory tower in a cushy office, being a bit soft. But Diogenes was a hard guy who lived a hard life. And again, I think we can see a connection between the Stoics and the Cynics via Seneca. Seneca said, we treat the body rigorously so that it is not disobedient to the mind. The Stoics are saying, you push yourself, you find out where your limits are, you develop strength and self confidence, and independence is as a result of pushing yourself in this way. And not only does this make you healthier, it helps you think more clearly, it makes you more resilient, and it makes you ultimately better. We're told by a biographer of Diogenes, also named Diogenes. It's a little confusing, but he says, sure, we have the ideals, and that's what part of the philosophical training is about, the ideas. He says, but none of this, the ideas and the virtue, he says, none of it is complete without help, because health and strength are equally essential for training both the mind and the body. There's another story that I like about Diogenes. Diogenes is starting to get advanced in age, and a friend is saying, like, why don't you slow down? And Diogenes is sort of taken aback by this. He says, why would I take it easy now that I'm old? He says, if you were running a distance race, would you slow down when you were approaching the finish line? He says, wouldn't I do bet to speed up? And this reminds me of one of my favorite stories about Marcus Aurelius. Marcus Aurelius is an old man. He's considered wise, he's considered powerful. He's a philosopher king, and he's seen leaving the palace in Rome, and a friend stops him and he says, you know, where are you going? And Marcus says, I'm off to see Sextus the philosopher, to learn that which I do not yet know. The man's amazed. He says, here we have the king of the Romans still taking up his tablets and going to school. Epicurus, another philosopher from Roman around this period, says sort of the same thing, that to say that you're too young or too old to learn is to say that you're too young or too old to be happy. Like, this is the whole point of existence. And so I think Diogenes is right here. We should not just become students at some early point in our life, but we have to stay students at all points of our life. We always have to be learning. And while we are alive, we should be living. And so what makes Diogenes so great? What's motivating him? He's not trying to be rich. He's not trying to be famous. He's not trying to be important. He's not trying to be a great athlete. In fact, he thinks it's interesting that people compete in all these areas and not the area that actually matters. We're told that. He says, I see many men competing in wrestling and running, but no one competing in the pursuit of human excellence. So that's what Diogenes is after, sort of human excellence. He's trying to get to the core of the human experience, what actually makes a great and powerful person. And he believes it's not all these trappings, it's not status, it's not any of the things that other people are after. It's something deeper, something more profound. And that's what makes him this great philosopher. And lastly, I think one of my favorite lines from Diogenes, he's asked why he changed his opinion about something, right? We would think that a philosopher would be consistent. And he says, look, I used to piss my bed, but I don't do that anymore, right? The point is, a philosopher should be able to change your mind. Cicero talked about this, about remaining a free agent. Things are always changing and we should be able to change. Marx Rius talks about how someone brings you new information. They point out where you've been mistaken. They're not harming you, they're helping you. They're helping you become what you need to be. But that can only happen if you change. If you're willing to change your mind, if you're willing to change your practices, if you're willing to incorporate this new information in. And I think we should even think about this with Diogeny. A lot of what he says might make us uncomfortable. It might question some assumptions we've long held. But he knew what he was talking about. And in hearing from him, he can help correct us, he can help guide us, he can help point us in the right direction. Maybe you love the Stoics, maybe you're Christian, maybe you prefer the Eastern thinkers. But there's something in Diogenes, something in the cynics. Even if it's not totally practical, even if it's a little too extreme for some of us, that can help us question things, that can help us think about things from a new perspective. By taking things to a logical extreme, or by subjecting them to extreme circumstances, Diogenes helps us understand ourselves, our own assumptions, our own ideas better. Seneca talked about this too, how we want to read like a spy in the enemy's camp. I think studying other schools of philosophies help us understand and improve our beliefs. As a result.