Could the L.A. Fires Have Been Stopped Sooner?

The Daily

•

Published: Tue Jan 14 2025

A week after fires broke out in the Los Angeles area, Californians are grappling with the widespread destruction. They’re also seeking answers from their leaders about why so much has been lost. Mike Baker and Christopher Flavelle, who have been covering the fires, discuss the authorities’ response and whether some of the devastation could have been avoided.

Summary

Podcast Summary: The Daily - "Could the L.A. Fires Have Been Stopped Sooner?"

Released on January 14, 2025

Introduction

In this gripping episode of The Daily, hosted by Natalie Kitroev from The New York Times, the listeners are taken deep into the heart of Southern California's raging wildfires. For seven consecutive days, relentless flames have devastated communities in Los Angeles, prompting urgent questions about the adequacy of the government's response and whether the catastrophe could have been mitigated or even prevented.

The Devastation: Personal Stories and Immediate Impact

From the onset at [00:34], the episode paints a harrowing picture of the fires' destructive force. Natalie Kitroev introduces the dire situation, highlighting the emotional toll on residents:

Resident Testimony ([01:23]–[02:07]):
- "My family and I just lost our home here that we grew up in. It's hard not to cry." ([01:45])
- "People tell me to be strong. It's like, how much stronger do I have to be?" ([02:03])

The narrative delves into the widespread loss as destroyed neighborhoods in the Palisades and Altadena are reduced to ashes. Graphic accounts include the tragic discovery of Victor Shaw, found lifeless, clutching a garden hose ([02:07]–[02:37]).

Emily Baumgartner Nunn's Interview with Steve Sykes ([03:39]–[07:43]): Steve Sykes narrates the loss of his home and the emotional struggle to comprehend the rapid devastation:

"How am I going to explain to my children? Because I can't even understand what I'm seeing in front of me right now."
Expresses anger towards the lack of proactive measures: "I think 50% of the loss could have been prevented." ([06:15])

Firefighting Efforts and Challenges

Chris Lovell Interviews Mike Baker ([07:43]–[19:59]): Mike Baker provides a detailed account of the firefighting strategies and the hurdles faced:

Preparation Efforts ([08:00]–[09:29]):
- "They started to refill water tanks all over the city... pre-positioning trucks in vulnerable areas."
- Despite these measures, critical areas like Pacific Palisades didn't receive extra resources ([09:08]).
Fire Progression and Escalation ([10:38]–[16:08]):
- Rapid fire spread fueled by intense winds, leading to overwhelmed firefighting resources.
- Crushing realization of insufficient water supply: "The city could not fill them up to keep pace with how much water was being used." ([14:56])
Consequences of Resource Depletion ([15:39]–[16:53]):
- "Municipal water systems... are really designed for small fires, handling, you know, blazes that might consume a few homes, not one that is consuming a few hundred all at once." ([15:39])
- Critical reservoirs were offline due to maintenance, exacerbating the firefighting crisis ([15:48]).

Fire Department Leadership Insights ([17:36]–[19:19]): Fire Chief Kristen Crowley confronts the aftermath:

Admits budget cuts severely hampered firefighting capabilities: "Yes, we took a $17 million budget cut... negatively impact our ability to carry out our mission." ([17:54])
Contrastingly, the Mayor denies the impact of these cuts on the current disaster ([18:46]–[19:00]).
Mike Baker reflects on community sentiments, suggesting that while additional resources might have provided marginal benefits, the scale of the disaster was likely beyond what could have been managed even with more funding ([19:20]–[19:59]).

Government Response and Budgetary Constraints

The episode scrutinizes the tension between the Fire Chief’s claims of insufficient funding and the Mayor’s stance that budget cuts did not influence the fire response.

Fire Chief’s Assertion ([17:54]–[18:22]):
- "Any budget cut would negatively impact our ability to carry out our mission."
- Warned about the potential devastation from further cuts.
Mayor’s Rebuttal ([18:46]–[19:10]):
- Denies that the previous $17 million cut affected the response to the fires.

Mike Baker concludes that while more resources might have alleviated some issues, the unprecedented scale of the fires may have overwhelmed any prepared system ([19:20]–[19:59]).

Climate Change and Preparedness

Conversation with Chris Lovell and Climate Reporter ([20:50]–[37:42]): Chris Lovell engages with a climate reporter to explore the broader implications of the fires:

Impact of Climate Change ([21:10]–[22:14]):
- "Climate change makes this all harder. The combination of rising temperatures and longer droughts mean you've got more vegetation ready to burn." ([21:10]).
California’s Preparedness Paradox ([22:14]–[26:44]):
- Despite stringent building codes and proactive measures, California remains highly vulnerable due to its inherent geographical and climatic conditions.
- "California has been pretty thorough at setting up a system of prevention and toughening that can make these fires, in theory, more manageable." ([24:09]).
- The reporter questions whether current preparedness can keep pace with the accelerating impacts of climate change: "Is the pace of climate change just faster than the pace of possible adaptation?" ([26:11]).
Future Implications and Rebuilding Challenges ([26:44]–[37:42]):
- Discussions revolve around the difficult decisions regarding rebuilding practices, potentially necessitating more fire-resistant constructions or even relocating communities.
- Economic and emotional barriers present significant challenges to implementing more radical safety measures.
- "None of those solutions are really satisfying. But here we are. We've got a gigantic city in a fire zone, so maybe that's the best there is." ([36:00]).

Future Implications: Rebuilding and Policy Shifts

The episode contemplates the aftermath of the fires and the future of Los Angeles:

Rebuilding Strategies ([29:13]–[35:47]):
- Governor Newsom's directive to ease building code provisions to expedite rebuilding.
- Tension between rapid reconstruction and implementing more resilient building standards.
- Potential for long-term policy shifts favoring more fire-resistant structures: "When we build back, we build back homes that are more resistant to wildfires." ([30:08]).
Community and Sociopolitical Challenges ([34:48]–[37:42]):
- Realignment of urban planning to balance housing needs with fire safety.
- Emotional resistance from homeowners against relocating or altering their living spaces.
- The profound challenge of reshaping a major metropolis like Los Angeles to adapt to escalating climate threats.

Conclusion

The episode culminates by underscoring the complexity of addressing wildfire devastation in the context of climate change. While Los Angeles has implemented extensive preventive measures, the scale and intensity of the recent fires reveal critical vulnerabilities in preparedness and resource allocation. The discussions highlight an urgent need for systemic changes and a reevaluation of how cities like Los Angeles can sustainably coexist with increasingly frequent and severe wildfires.

Notable Quotes with Timestamps

Steve Sykes ([06:15]): "I think 50% of the loss could have been prevented."
Fire Chief Kristen Crowley ([17:54]): "Any budget cut would negatively impact our ability to carry out our mission."
Climate Reporter ([21:10]): "Climate change makes this all harder... more vegetation ready to burn."
Resident ([35:47]): "It's almost too hard to ask... but the last week of fires show that you have to at least think about it."

This comprehensive summary encapsulates the critical discussions, personal narratives, and analytical insights presented in the episode, offering listeners a profound understanding of the multifaceted challenges posed by the L.A. wildfires and the broader implications for urban resilience in the era of climate change.