Dan Patrick (9:22)
I get into arguments because I hate analytics. I hate all analytics people. I don't like nerds. And, and I always get into this with, with guys. You like the two point conversion play and we got to go for it on fourth down and all this stuff. And you know, you get the sample size of data. But hey, man, if I haven't blocked your defensive front all day long, right, that data changes. If my guards can't handle your three techniques, if my tackles can't handle your defensive ends, then we need to change like, like that. Math doesn't work. Math has never made a tackle. Math has never blocked anybody. Math has never done any of that stuff. Okay. We posted this yesterday on social media. Got a lot of reaction and got a lot of reaction from the people who actually are the analytic nerds. According to Mark Schlerith, Michael Wilbond's been banging the drum against analytics for a long, long, long time. I understand it. I mentioned this before. Back in the late 60s, my father, working in computer science, came up with probability. It wasn't called analytics, but he was working at the University of Dayton, and he was trying to help. The coach at the time turns out to be Sean McVeigh's grandfather, and he's trying to give him information of what. What happens when this team has the ball here in this situation. So probability. And he was feeding information into a computer, giving out the probabilities to the head coach. So it's been around a long, long, long time. It's just we started to call it analytics, and I think that bothered people. Almost as if, oh, you're better than us. Oh, you're smarter than us. Oh, you went to Harvard. Oh, you went to Stanford. Well, they're just looking at the game. Same with baseball. Same with basketball. The analytics say shoot the three. The math says shoot the three. Baseball, go for a home run. Okay? There's data. And people have spent a lot of time, years and years and years to come up with the data. Now, do I side towards gut? Yes, because gut is in the moment. If I go into a game and I go, hey, if we get fourth and four inside the 10, we're going for it. Okay? And I do believe, you know, with Sean Payton going forward on fourth down and in the moment, I said, just kick the field goal. He's getting a lot of blame because of that. But I think the analytics show, from what I was told, the analytics say, go for the field goal. There he went against analytics. So I don't know. And once again, I haven't followed it that closely with the analytics, but there were a couple of reports that said Sean Payton went against the analytics, kick the field goal, but in the moment, backup quarterback. And then you had analytics experts who said, wait, you don't think we factor in that it's a backup quarterback or the weather or. I don't know how it changes when a snowstorm comes in. How do you change the analytics to give that information to the teams in real time? So now all of a sudden, I got a backup quarterback. I got an offensive line that can't protect my quarterback. The Patriots defense is a whole lot better than we thought. I got snow, I got Wind. And you're going to tell me in real time that you're going to come up with analytics there. I understand. Going into the game, hey, we're not going to go towards Christian Gonzalez, third and long. We're not going in his direction. Okay, but what if he's, you know, got a banged up ankle or something? Or maybe he's limping a little bit. Maybe my offensive line isn't as good as we thought. Against their defensive line, we don't have the time to be able to throw deep. Like, it just feels like there's so much. It's a fluid topic. And I. I think that we get. We kind of get bogged down on. Oh, analytics says, here, look, let me look at my sheet. I can look at that sheet. It's like when, you know, Tony La Russa did this, you know, the smartest man in baseball history, or so I'm told, hey, we got this matchup. The analytics say this. All I know is their managers who get fired because of analytics, you know, go back to Tommy Lasorda with a gut instinct to put Kurt Gibson against Dennis Eckersley that analytics would have said, are you crazy? But Tommy brought up Kurt Gibson against one of the greatest closers of all time, and he hits a home run. So there's a gut feeling that should be attached to this. I understand analytics and I'm fine with it. I just don't like when I see a coach look at a piece of paper and go, we're going for it. Yes, he.