Brady Quinn (13:50)
It's a shame. And I understand from the Southern Cal perspective, but this would, this would be my argument, I think out there and a lot of people be like, oh, you're biased or you're not objective because you went to Notre Dame, you played. Look, I did and I. But I lost to SC in every one of those matchups and then playing against them in the greatest area or excuse me, era of SC football. I think that's fair to say and it's probably factual, at least during that time period where they won back to back national championships, played for a third and they were in contention for it. Even my senior year, when we went out there, if they didn't, I think drop A game. What is it? The UCLA maybe, whoever they dropped the game to at some point, you know, that season that caused, you know, Florida to go instead of sc. But I. I would. I would go back and play those games and experience it all over again. Even if, you know, again, that was the challenge of playing. It's the number one team in the country every single one of those years. And knowing that, like, our program wasn't built back up to that extent anymore, because that was part of the reason why you went to Notre Dame. It was for the Notre Dame SC game. It was for a lot of those rivalries that you played for. And I think the tough thing for me, with this entire conversation around this rivalry that has existed since, what, 1926, I mean, we've missed because of a world war in Covid. That's the only two times the conversation about this rivalry not being renewed. It didn't start with Notre Dame. It started with Southern Count. It started with Lincoln Riley. He was the first person that introduced this. And what's interesting about that is he had two years in the Pac 12 before that got dismantled, or at least I should say transformed to what it is today, where he didn't win the conference. You know, they. They struggled to beat Notre Dame, and so there was really no excuses then. But I think when they moved into the Big Ten, they realized, like, oh, we actually have to play an even tougher schedule now. And because of that, they viewed this game as too big of a. Big of a challenge. What's crazy to me, though, is, like, Pete Carroll would have never ducked this game. Never. And you've got a head coach now that's willing to. That's willing to throw out history, throw out tradition. And he's been enabled by their athletic director in Jen Cohen, who should be able to stand up and say, like, this is part of the deal. When you took the job, you knew you were going to play them every. Every single year. That's part of the deal. It's part of the job. Marcus Freeman took it knowing that. Brian Kelly took it knowing that. That's part of one of those games you get fired up for. But because of SC's decision to then leave the Pac 12, which ultimately led to its crumbling, join the Big Ten, and because of their lack of success and ability to compete, we now have a rivalry that goes away. Because what's changed for Notre Dame in that time? Absolutely nothing. They changed head coaches, athletic directors, presidents. There was never a point in time where Notre Dame asked to be out of this rivalry, even during my era where we went to a couple back to back BCS games where we could be competitive, but not to the lengths of the team that was number one in the country. Never. And we've still remained independent, which a lot of people hold against Notre Dame for that, you know, for, for why we've done it. And I've explained this to you. I mean, there's a deep history to this. It's deeply rooted in, in Notre Dame's Catholicism and the way, you know, Catholics at one point in time this country were persecuted. And why Notre Dame became this national brand, it wasn't because of, you know, necessarily just because of marketing and Newt Rockne. It had a lot to do with the fact that there were teams that didn't want to let us in the Western Conference, which became the Big Ten because of their Catholic roots. So Notre Dame went out traveling amongst the country to play whoever they could play, and then became this national brand that was born from that. So when people ask you to join a conference, maybe they just don't really understand the roots and the, the deep tie there is to Catholicism and why that matters for everyone who's been a part of Notre Dame since then. But I digress, because it's not about that. To me, it's about SC and it's about them not having any success in this series of late, making the decision to join a conference now that they're having a hard time competing in, and then not having a head coach and an athletic director that can stand up and say, you know what? Like, we're going to keep doing this because we're going to get this right, because we believe that it will eventually get back on top of that mountain. And you can blame Notre Dame for saying, like, well, obviously they didn't concede to sc, which. Think about that matchup in general. Jonas, we never. They never play in the cold months in South Bend. They play in October. It's, it's not like they're forcing SC to have to play an inclement weather. Like at the end of the season, they're playing in October, there's still plenty of football left to be played. And then Southern Cal gets to host at the end of the season at their place, which plays all to their advantage in that regard. So even the way it's scheduled as it was, it was never playing to the advantage of Notre Dame. It was never forcing them to come play in inclement weather at some point in November in South Bend, it's always played to SC's advantage.