Stephen Miller (3:08)

Stephen Miller is with us. You know, I want to give some unsolicited advice because I love the people in this country and in cities and towns around this country, they're going to have these no Kings rally. And to me, it has all the feel of the environment in the summer of 2020. You know, the mostly peaceful riots where, you know, a couple of dozen dead Americans, thousands of injured cops, billions in property damage. I would advise people, again unsolicited, find out if there's a rally near where you are and stay away. I would hate to see innocent people hurt.

David Pakman (3:43)

Yep, stay away. Definitely don't go. Don't make the protests big. Don't do any of that. That's what we're hearing from the same network, Fox News, that spent years glorifying the patriots who stormed the Capitol. Now they say stay home. Keep it calm, keep it low key, scared. Now Hannity is, is sort of giving away the game when he goes. If you want to understand what the no Kings number two protests will be like on Saturday, think back to 2020. But you don't need to do that. If Hannity were honest, Hannity would say, hey, you can think back to a few months ago, the first no Kings protests, which were completely peaceful. If we want an assessment about how we expect no Kings number two to go, we would say, well, how did no Kings number one go? And it was completely peaceful and they hate that. They rioted on January 6th. And on no Kings Day 1, we were completely peaceful. I stopped by a bunch of these different events. There was a police presence. The police didn't need to get involved. Now, can you find some anecdotal incident from some chapter protest? Probably right. But these were almost completely, and I would argue overwhelmingly peaceful protests. They know that massive peaceful protests destroy their narrative. And they show the country that we aren't as defeated as Trump wants us to be. They are scared for good reason. Because when we look at history, remember the three and a half percent concept. It is believed that it takes about three and a half percent of a population actively peacefully protesting, refusing to go along with what the regime is doing to effect change. Three and a half percent in the United States, based on our population, that's about 12 million people. 12 million people showing up, marching, speaking out. No violence, no chaos, just visible and. And clear. We didn't quite get to those numbers in no King's number one, but the numbers were big and it got a ton of coverage. They know that if the turnout is a little bit bigger this time than it was last time, we are going to start getting for them dangerously close to that three and a half percent. So Trump is insisting the protests are going to be small. Sean Hannity is saying to people, stay away. Because if even a fraction of this country actually shows up, it won't just be a protest, it could actually be a turning point. And that is what really terrifies these people. It is not only Stephen Miller saying stay away, agreeing with Sean Hannity. It is not only Hannity himself staying, saying stay away. It is not only Donald Trump saying, these are going to be small. Even people who have no business talking about this stuff, like Trump's Treasury Secretary, are talking about the protests. I want to talk about that next. Scott Bessant is Trump's Treasury Secretary. You may recall I famously sat next to him at dinner at Kaleo in Washington D.C. not long ago. Not at the same table. He was adjacent to me at the next table over. He looked miserable, didn't say a word to the people he was dining with the entire time, ate his chicken fingers and then now he didn't have chicken fingers, but ate his food and then quietly left. He truly seems miserable. And he now is jumping in with what some are calling a psychotic episode live on stage over a protest over the forthcoming no Kings Day. Number two. He is taking a different approach than Trump's approach and Hannity's approach. Trump's approach was it's going to be really small, small. Hannity's approach was for safety, stay away. Besant's approaches. These are going to be far left, hardcore, unhinged protests.

Adelita Grijalva (7:46)

And we're on day 15 and it doesn't look like there's any sign of a deal.

Unknown Political Commentator (7:51)

Well, there's, there's a thought out there that they're at least waiting to this crazy no Kings rally. They're crazy this weekend, which is going to be the farthest left, the hardest core, the most unhinged in the Democratic Party, which is, you know, a big title and, you know, no kings equal, no paychecks. We are paying our military. Today the Pentagon went into surplus funds and we'll be able to make the paychecks. And, you know, I.

David Pakman (8:25)

They're terrified. They're terrified and they are completely detached from reality. They want to tell you things about no Kings. As if we couldn't just think back to a few months ago when we had a no Kings Day. They want to act like this is going to be. It could be anything. It could be completely whacked. Anarchy, violence. The no Kings Day already happened, and it was massive and it was entirely peaceful. So either Scott Bessant doesn't know that, or he's pretending that he doesn't know that. Which raises the question, is he knowingly lying? Is he psychotic? What is the deal with Besson? And honestly, the bigger question is, what is the Treasury Secretary doing talking about protests? His job is the economy. His job, you know, it's. He is not supposed to be focused on whatever delusions Donald Trump's staff dreams up to scare viewers. In this case of cnbc, Sometimes it's Fox News. It's like if Janet Yellen had gotten up at a press conference and warned about Burning man, for example, I think a lot of us would be saying, why is Janet Yellen talking about this? And what does it even mean to say, no kings equals no paychecks? Is he suggesting that the people going don't have jobs? Because they mostly do. It's. It's a weekend. Most people have weekends off. Not everybody. Not a lot of service workers, of course. But the whole point is we're going to reject authoritarianism. That's the whole idea. It's not about being far left, it's not about being hardcore. But these are people so deep in the cult that they hear no Kings and they think, oh, my God, they're coming for capitalism. Now, there's no question that there are people who will be protesting this weekend who are not so big on capitalism, and that's fine. That's not really what the protests are about. What they are really afraid of here is the truth. And the truth is for millions of people to peacefully mobilize and say, we don't want Kings, we don't want authoritarianism. We want democracy. And if people stand up again, they won't be able to gaslight the country into silence. They are scared of that. And that is at the. At the foundation of. Of what terrifies them so much. Now, the other side of this is that there are new, objectively terrifying things happening that have developed since no Kings number one. And one of those is that in the midst of this government shutdown, which is ongoing, my DC trip is canceled. For those that were wondering there was going to be this Creator Summit in D.C. we've been talking about it on the award winning bonus show and that's been canceled because of the shutdown. Oh, well, that's not really a big deal. But the big deal is that there are millions of people who may no longer be able to afford health care as a result of what's happening with the health care subsidies. Let's talk about the latest from Bernie and AOC on that. Yesterday CNN did a town hall with Bernie Sanders, Senator and Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, Congresswoman. The topic of health care came up and what I love about this is that Bernie and AOC are talking not in esoteric, theoretical, hypothetical terms, they are talking in practical, tangible language, number one, about what happens when people can no longer afford health care. And number two, what that might mean for Republicans. And Bernie pointed out that under Donald Trump, health care premiums are skyrocketing November 1st, which we're getting close to is the start of open enrollment where people are going to be notified. People. Myself as well, right. I as a person with my own business, I buy a plan on the the exchange and last year I gave you a report. I think my plan went from somewhere in the 600amonth or maybe 580 or something like that up to 747amonth this year I am paying 747amonth, same plan. Plan didn't get any better. 747amonth. I am waiting November 1st to be told how much is my plan going to go up. And there are millions of Americans who will not be able to afford their plan once they are notified how much more expensive it's going to get. Here's Bernie explaining this.

Bernie Sanders (12:54)

I think the Republicans are catching on that you can't throw 15 million Americans off of the health care they have. And studies indicate that when you do that, some 50,000Americans a year will die unnecessarily. And then on top of that, just in Vermont today, Caitlin, people in my state and all over this country are beginning to receive notices from insurance companies about what their new premiums will be if we do not stop what Trump is doing. In my state of Vermont, there are people today who receive notices that their premiums are going to quadruple, quadruple some less. Three times in my state of Rome. And again, this is true in many parts of the country. Middle class families will be paying $50,000 a year for health care. Anyone think that's sane? It's not. Who can afford that? Republicans are catching on. They're playing a losing hand. They are going to come to the table finally and address the health care crisis.

David Pakman (14:01)

All right, so Bernie says Republicans are going to have no chance, no chance to get away with this and that they're going to have to address it. That, I mean, hopefully that is true to a degree. But I think that Bernie might underestimate the willingness of Republicans to take a bet that they can just blame Democrats and they're trying to blame Democrats saying this is the Democrat shutdown and blah, blah, blah. Let's hear from Congresswoman AOC briefly here before getting, get getting back to the discussion. AOC talking about how a one year extension on those health care subsidies would simply be laughable.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (14:40)

The end of December, obviously Open enrollment starts November 1st. Over in the House, there are 14 House Republicans who have said that they will sign on and they will vote for a one year extension of the subsidies. House or House. Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said he thought that proposal was laughable. Do you think that's laughable or is that something you could get behind? Yeah.

Donald Trump (14:59)

No.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (14:59)

Let me tell you why it's laughable, because it's cynical. Republicans want to sign on to just a one little extra year of these ACA subsidies. You want to know why? What's happening next year midterm elections. They want to extend these subsidies just a year extra so that people don't realize the dupe that they are pulling on everyone so that they can all re elect themselves and, and allow those things to expire the moment that they win reelection. And it is time to get politics out of what should be a guaranteed universal right in the United States of America. And that is health care. And so I will not accept a measly one year acceptance of a measly one year extension of the aca. We need to make sure and I, and as a member of the party, we put negotiations in the hands of our party's leadership with Hakeem Jeffries. He says it's no, it's no. And we have to make sure that we are expanding and continuing the fight and not allowing, not falling for the fine print, not falling for the tricks and not falling for the politics around this.

David Pakman (16:13)

Now there are some in the usual places on the Internet saying AOC has sold out. Did you hear how she said Hakeem Jeffries said no. And we're going to be united behind Hakeem Jeffries. She is sold out to Democratic leadership. We'll put that aside for a second and just analyze it for what she's saying. It is a trap. Trump and his allies want voters to think that their health care is safe until the day after the midterms and then subsidies will vanish and premiums will explode. They're running the same scam that they pulled with the tax cut cuts, which is you give temporary crumbs to everyday Americans and you do massive dumps of giveaways for billionaires. And then when the bill comes due, like I said and AOC knows it, when the bill comes due, they'll go, oh, Democrat mismanagement caused this. So Bernie's warning about it. AOC is warning, warning about it. This is health care as political blackmail. And at the end of the day it is cynical, it is cruel. But it's classic maga nomics. Pretend to help working people quietly load the gun pointed at their own wallets. And if the left can communicate that clearly that this is really about your money, your coverage, your family and your health, the Republicans lose the argument. The question is, are Democrats able, equipped and prepared to communicate about it appropriately? Democrats often don't communicate well as we spoke about yesterday with Jake Akin Kloss. Let's hope the answer is yes. But AOC and Bernie certainly communicating clearly here. Let me know what you think. Send me an email info@david pakman.com the question is, will voters fall for the Republican scam on who really wants to protect your health care? The debt system in this country is a trap. Credit cards, collections, medical bills. It piles up and once you're in it, they don't want you to get out but you can take control back. Our sponsor, PDS Debt helps people with credit card, medical and personal loan debt. Cut what you owe with a personalized relief plan based on your unique financial situation. No credit score requirement, no pressure, no cost to get started. They have already helped hundreds of thousands of people A plus rated by the Better Business Bureau. Thousands of five star reviews on Google and trustpilot. Because they do it right, you don't have to live in fear of the next bill or the next collection call. Let PDS debt show you a better path. It's your money. It's your Future. You are 30 seconds away from starting that path to getting debt free. Get your free assessment. Find the best option for you right now at pds debt.com/pacman. The link is in the description. A pending Supreme Court case could strip our fourth Amendment rights and allow immigration agents to come into our homes for any reason. No probable cause needed. All while Republicans try to twist things so that you think this is all great for America. This should be the biggest story in the US right now, but it's almost impossible to keep up with the millions of moves that Trump is making every single day. That's why Ground News exists. Ground News is an app and website that exposes the blind spots and spin before it takes control of our opinions. Ground News is the smarter, more reliable way to stay informed when MAGA is banking on us getting distracted. I'm partnering up with Ground News to give you 40% off the same vantage plan that I use, so you'll pay only five bucks a month for all of their premium features. Just go to Ground News, slash Pacman or use the code Pacman in the app. When you sign up, the link is in the description or scan the QR code. This is pretty funny. Donald Trump finally appeared to address the issue of his brain and of IQ points, but he was trying to do it in a way to attack a Democrat. In this case, the Democrat is Chuck Schumer. Trump started talking about Schumer's IQ and said, I believe Schumer's losing IQ in real time. If it happened with me, Trump says, you'd know about it very quickly. To which I would say, we have noticed, sir. We are aware of it.

Donald Trump (20:45)

This is a Democrat Schumer shutdown, and he's trying to do it to get relevance back into the party because he's a loser. I've known him all his life. He's always been sort of a loser, but an intelligent one. But I think he's losing IQ points, points with time. I think that happens. I hope it hasn't happened with me. I know if it did, you guys will let me know about it. Very quickly.

David Pakman (21:06)

Very quickly. Well, we have, we have. And we now have Governor Gavin Newsom, Senator Ruben Gallego, Governor J.B. pritzker, a whole bunch of other people. I heard Heather Cox Richardson the other day saying something is going on with Trump's brain. And so it's less about iq. But this is yet another one of those moments, more about cognition. It's another one of those moments where Donald Trump sort of ends up giving up the game on his biggest insecurities. For all of the talk about how it's usually black women he says are low iq, he goes, jasmine Crockett's low IQ aoc, who's not black but Hispanic. She, it's, she's low iq, but sometimes it's just Democrats. Chuck Schumer's losing IQ points. This, as usual, goes to one of Donald Trump's own insecurities. Trump's dad had dementia, and there is a Degree to which these things are, it's not totally well understood, but they can run in families. And I don't know if hereditary is the right word, but where it makes sense, Trump would be worried about his big a brain based on family history. And the answer to Trump saying, I think if this happened to me, people would let me know. People have been trying to let Donald Trump know. Now. Trump later started talking about him being hard. Like he, he, he went on and on about how he's not soft. It was really, really weird.

Donald Trump (22:31)

To Don in particular, he, I'll never forget Adam Schiff, Schiff, a total crooked guy lying in Congress making up a phone conversation that I have with you, totally made up. Then when he heard it was taped, he wanted to disappear. And Nancy Pelosi went crazy because they wanted to impeach me based on the conversation that was made up when they heard the tape. Everybody, you know, I won it unanimously in the Republican Party. I got every single vote. Something that never happens, and I beat it. But think of it, they want to put my son in jail for something that they made up. So they know they made it up. And they say he will serve the rest of his life in prison. These are sick, bad people. And don't tell me about us going after them. If anything, where we've been very, very soft, I wouldn't be that soft, I'll tell you that. Thank you very much, everybody.

David Pakman (23:26)

No softness from Trump whatsoever, figuratively, metaphorically, nor literally. And people around the country hearing that and going, what they the hell is Donald Trump talking about now? It then got authoritarian, as it often does when you put Trump together with his team of sycophants and dilettantes. And Trump was asked, after striking Venezuelan boats, Trump was asked, are you considering striking land on Venezuela? And Trump goes, well, I don't know. That I want to say sounds like a yes. What's the next step in this war on cartels? And are you considering options? Are you considering strikes on land?

Donald Trump (24:07)

Well, I don't want to tell you exactly, but we are certainly looking at land now because we've got the sea very well under control. We've had a couple of days where there isn't a boat to be found and that I view that as a good thing, not a bad thing. But we had tremendous amounts coming in by boats, by very expensive boats. You know, they have a lot of money. Very fast, very expensive boats that were.

David Pakman (24:27)

Pretty big and the way big, fast, powerful boats.

Donald Trump (24:31)

You look at it is every boat that we knock out, we save 25,000American lives. So every time you see a boat and you feel badly, you say, wow, that's rough. It is rough. But if you lose three people and save 25,000 people, these are people that are killing our population.

David Pakman (24:48)

Trump with a sort of demented utilitarianism. God, I do find myself, it's sort of like, who cares about the law anymore these days? Not the administration, but I do feel inclined just to mention that Donald Trump has absolutely no act of Congress to support any of this action against Venezuela. It's unlawful, it's obviously disgraceful. And a reporter asked a pretty good question, which is, why not just have the Coast Guard stop the boats? Like, why are we bombing boats off the coast of Venezuela? The Coast Guard is legally allowed to stop the boats, and there's no question of legality there. And Trump goes, well, it's just not that effective on Venezuelan votes. I want to ask you, why not have the Coast Guard stop them, which it is empowered by law to do? You know, this way you can confirm who's on the boat and ensure that they're doing what they suspect.

Donald Trump (25:47)

Because we've been doing that for 30 years and it has been totally ineffective. They have faster boats. Some of these boats are seriously. I mean, they're world class speedboats and. But they're not faster than missiles. But we've been trying to do that for years. And so much of the drugs, 25, 30% would come in through the seas.

David Pakman (26:08)

You know, I don't know why you wouldn't give the Nobel Peace Prize to the guy going, well, we're bombing the boats instead of stopping them because it's easier and the missiles are faster than the boats. Give this man a Nobel Peace Prize. Why wouldn't they? In another one of these strange moments of is he having a stroke? Donald Trump talked about a trade deal with India. I'm sorry, with Iran and Pakistan, and talked about tariffs to prevent war. I guess it's very much unintelligible.

Donald Trump (26:45)

We tariffs are a very important tool for our defense, for our national security. If we don't have tariffs, we're not going to have national security. As an example, if you look at Pakistan and Iran, I told them I was in the midst of negotiating a trade deal with actually with Iran, and Pakistan was going to be in line, and because of tariffs, they all want to negotiate much differently. We would make it a good deal.

David Pakman (27:11)

And then anybody understanding this, I heard.

Donald Trump (27:14)

That they're shooting at each other. And I said during one of my conversations, are you guys going to go to war. Two nuclear powers we are thinking about. I said, here's the deal. You go to war, I'm going to put a 200% tariff. I'm going to stop you from doing any business in the United States. I said it to both of them. Within 24 hours, the war ended. That would have been a nuclear war. And again, the prime minister of Pakistan, who was here two weeks ago, said that that man saved many millions of lives.

David Pakman (27:47)

I guess what Trump is saying is that tariffs prevented a nuclear war. Your mileage may vary with that as a technique. Finally, in a horrible moment, Trump turns to Newt Gingrich and says, newt, you agree I won Georgia in 2020. Right. No matter what the election results say. Good, because otherwise I would have you fired. And everybody has a good time. But this is the. This is the loyalty test that we've been talking about.

Donald Trump (28:19)

By the way, you won Georgia three times.

Bernie Sanders (28:20)

Just.

Donald Trump (28:21)

Yeah, I agree. You agree with me. The media, for someone that he's the. Spends a lot of time in Georgia.

JD Vance (28:26)

I believe you won that.

Donald Trump (28:28)

I really have a question. But, you know, the word believe isn't strong enough. Right.

David Pakman (28:32)

You know, so here he's talking to Brian Glenn, Marjorie Taylor Greene's boyfriend, but now he turns to Newt.

Donald Trump (28:38)

I know. I want to. Oh, we have the great Newt Gingrich. Newt, you agree with us. Good. Otherwise I'd have him dismissed immediately. You know, his wife, as you know, is becoming an ambassador to a great country. Calista. So congratulations. And we're going to take a picture. And the only reason I'm doing. He speaks so well of me.

David Pakman (28:58)

Yep.

Donald Trump (28:58)

He said, I'll go down as the greatest president in history. And then he blew it. He said, I'm not sure if I put him above Washington or Lincoln. So I'm not that happy about that.

David Pakman (29:10)

Dude, this is a. It's sort of joking, but this is cronyism. These are the loyalty tests. Newt, you believe I won Georgia in 2020, right? You do. Well, then your wife gets. Gets an ambassadorship. This is how Trump operates. He's doing it in. In plain daylight, and he's getting away with it because nothing and no one seems to have the teeth to stop him. All right, the bribes are just pouring in to Donald Trump, and he is bragging about it. Yesterday, speaking in the East Room of the White House and talking about how people were desperate to give him 25 million bucks, just pouring money upon him. Why do I feel like this clip might be evidence in a future criminal trial? Oh, wait, no. That would be only if we had a functional justice system.

Donald Trump (30:03)

I mean, I have so many friends, and so many of you have been really, really generous. I mean, a couple of you, I'm sitting here saying, sir, with $25 million, be appropriate. I said, I'll take it. I mean, I have so many friends and so many. Really?

David Pakman (30:17)

Would 25 million be okay with you? And I would love that. I would love that. Donald Trump also pointing out, I guess yesterday was the sort of like, just admit everything, don't cover it up anymore. Trump admitting that there are people who, for whatever reason, even though they didn't Support him in 2024, suddenly they're on his side. And, of course, this is the way authoritarians work. You'd better come over to my side or it'll get really ugly for you. If you're Mark Zuckerberg, for example, or Trump's political adversaries or whoever, and he's saying it all in broad daylight. Victory changes minds when people are terrified about your dictatorial ambition.

Donald Trump (30:58)

Three years ago, four years ago, it developed Spirit on November 5, where a lot of. With me, some of you weren't, but you quickly became with me. It's amazing the way a victory can change the minds of some people.

Bernie Sanders (31:11)

Oh, yeah.

Donald Trump (31:12)

But most of you were with me. And Pepe, you were fantastic. He's got a little sugar business. He has a monopoly. He has a monopoly on the world's sugar. I would say that's a good business. I know nothing about sugar, but I would say a monopoly on sugar is pretty good.

David Pakman (31:25)

Pepe, monopolies are good if they're your friends. Obviously. Trump then adopting the Persona of Dementia J. Trump, a character that we have come to know very, very well, talking about the Lincoln Bedroom.

Donald Trump (31:39)

Little things like at the Lincoln Bedroom, the bathroom was done by the Truman family and, you know, long time ago. And it's done in a green tile, and it's done as a. In a style that was not exactly Abe Lincoln, and it's a style that's not good.

David Pakman (31:58)

There you go. Very, very important stuff. And then also Trump talking about the gold leaf that they have covered the.

Donald Trump (32:05)

Oval Office, all lit up and gorgeous and perfect. And we take good care of it, too. Wasn't taken good care of. The Oval Office is now at a level that it's never seen before. We take really great care of it. They weren't taking good care of it for four years, I'll tell you that. Yep.

David Pakman (32:21)

The White House had no gold paint on it while Biden was president. And by the way, that's True. I was in, I was in the Oval Office when Biden was president. It didn't look tacky, it just looked nice. And now it is covered in gold paint. And finally, Donald Trump continuing his obsession with legacy and his delusions of grandeur, holding up the. I guess we're calling this the Arc de Trump. I guess it's a model of something they are going to build for Trump. I don't know. And it reminds me, quite frankly, it reminds me of when Hitler would sort of preside over little models of what Berlin or Munich would look like.

Donald Trump (33:05)

So that's Lady Liberty, lady video. But so the sizes would be very different. And this is.

David Pakman (33:21)

Trump is showing people little models of the things he wants to build. This is where we are, folks.

Donald Trump (33:31)

So this would be a small, medium and large.

David Pakman (33:41)

This is, you know, people in the room are laughing. This is, this is humiliating to see. And it's a reminder that Trump doesn't really want to be president. He wants to be real estate guy. At the end of the day, he wants to build and do development and the stuff he was able to do thanks to his daddy's money, but he doesn't want to be president. And you can tell because he's barely doing it. Make sure that you are subscribed on the YouTube channel YouTube.com/the David Pakman Show. Adelita Grijalva will join me next. Every time you Google your name, you will probably find dozens of sites that expose your personal information. This can include phone number, home address, family details. It's just sitting there waiting to be scraped or abused. Incogni is a privacy service. They go after these sites on your behalf. They contact the data brokers. They demand your data be removed, which the brokers are legally required to do. Incogni will automatically remove your information from hundreds of the biggest and most notorious data broker sites. But you're not just limited to those. You can use Incogni's custom removal. If you find your info on a website outside of Incogni's default list, team at Incogni will work to get that information removed. This is how you protect yourself and your family from identity theft, financial scams, harassment, even AI powered profiling by ad companies. And Incogni's data removal process is the only one verified independently by Deloitte. This gives them a unique level of credibility. Try Incogni risk free and get 60% off. When you go to incogni.com pacman and use the code PACMAN, the link is in the description. It is great to welcome to the program today, Representative elect for Arizona 7th congressional district, Adelita Grijalva. I can't think of a better day to talk to you than today, although any day would be fine. But today, today's a good day to talk to you because the delay of your being sworn in in the House of Representatives is sort of taking on a life of its own with conversations and questions as to why are you not being sworn in. Is it about the Epstein files? And there's all of these different questions that I want to unpack with you. So let's maybe start at the top. Have you spoken to House leadership, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson? What reason have you been given as to why you are not being sworn in?

Adelita Grijalva (36:17)

So we've had no communication with Speaker Johnson at all. So initially, I called and left a message that we sent a letter last Monday, and then day before yesterday, our attorney general sent a letter from Arizona. So there has been no communication. The only thing I hear is comments, you know, some flippant little comments every now and again through media sources. And then Leader Jeffries has reached out to try to, you know, there was a comment made. Well, whenever she wants to get sworn in, she can get sworn in. So Leader Jeffrey's office jumped on it right away. And then immediately there was backtracking on.

David Pakman (37:00)

That comment is to go through it in layers. You have no reason to believe anybody is questioning the legitimacy of your election victory, right? Like, they're not going that far. No.

Adelita Grijalva (37:14)

Initially, the comment was made, well, the race needs to be certified.

David Pakman (37:19)

Okay.

Adelita Grijalva (37:20)

The, you know, hypocrisy of that statement was short. Let me know. It happened right away because there are two Republicans that were sworn in with, you know, elected on April 1, sworn in on April 2 in a pro forma session less than 24 hours from their election. Two Republicans from Florida, Petronas and Fine. And then their Representative Walkinshaw was elected and sworn in less than 24 hours later. So those are the three that this speaker. That's sort of the precedent that this speaker has set. And so with me, I assumed, you know, votes were canceled on the 29th and 30th, which were the next few votes after I got elected. And I thought, okay, fine, it'll be October 7th. This speaker is choosing to close the House, but there is absolutely no reason for the House to be closed right now. And so the excuses are just that. They're just excuses. My race was certified 70% of the vote, nearly 70%, almost 40 points ahead of my nearest opponent. So there's no argument. I won.

Donald Trump (38:33)

Yep.

David Pakman (38:34)

The big question everybody has is whether this is an attempt to delay a signing of the discharge petition with regard to the Epstein files. Now, of course, the speculation is, if given the opportunity, you would take every vote and every opportunity to release those files. Is it your intention when you are ultimately sworn in to work for the release of the Epstein files? In other words, are they right that you would vote in that way?

Adelita Grijalva (39:02)

Oh, I absolutely would. And I would be the 218th signer, which is the vote needed to, you know, push a vote on the floor over the Epstein file. So initially, it was interesting because on my victory night, like the celebration, somebody came up to me and said, you know, he's not going to swear you in because of those Epstein files. And I thought, oh, my gosh, that's a lot of conspiracy theory. But here we are. Not think that this would be on my bingo card to, like, people know me because I'm not working. But, yeah, that's where we are. And I do believe that that's. That's definitely what it is. I mean, if you look at what Trump did during the campaign, he promised on day one that those files would be released. And then I think they got a gander at what was in all of that information.

David Pakman (39:51)

Yeah.

Adelita Grijalva (39:52)

And thought better of it.

David Pakman (39:53)

And so he started. Trump started to backtrack even before winning, where on that infamous Fox News interview, they said, mlk files, absolutely. JFK files, absolutely. Epstein files. And Trump said, yes, well, you know, that one's a little different. That told me everything I needed to know about. Ultimately, he doesn't really want these files out.

Adelita Grijalva (40:15)

Right. And the public wants them. It's this push for transparency that I think is really important. And also, more importantly, these victims deserve justice. And whomever is implicated in those files should have to deal with the consequences of what they did and the crimes that they committed, and then giving these victims an opportunity to be able to start to move forward. I mean, I can only imagine how often this comment comes up. And if you are part, you are one of the victims, how it has to reopen wounds over and over again that have never healed.

David Pakman (40:55)

Now, the thing I, to be honest, don't really understand. Even Marjorie Taylor Greene recently said, eventually, you're going to get sworn in and you're going to be number two. 18 if you want to be. What is the point of delaying? What might be, I don't know, a few more weeks or maybe a little longer? Like what? What do you believe is the point? Point? Since Inevitably, this is going to happen.

Adelita Grijalva (41:20)

Well, I think what has been happening, based on comments that have sort of been circulating in the media, is that Johnson has taken this time to try to convince one of the four Republicans to withdraw their names.

David Pakman (41:34)

Ah, so in other words, maybe they can. You would be to 18, but they could cross someone else off the list and prevent that. They, they. You think they have a plan here to actually prevent the 218 from becoming a real.

Adelita Grijalva (41:49)

Oh, I think so. And then this other argument that will oversight has the information. I talked to Chair Garcia, that's. And he literally said, that's B.S. we do not everything is redacted. We don't have all of the information that needs to get out.

David Pakman (42:05)

What my audience increasingly is expecting, and I'm curious your thoughts, is that yes, at some point something that will be called the Epstein files will come out, but that between now and that point, a lot of damage will be done to expectations about transparency and believability. And so that whenever whatever they call the Epstein files come out, they will either be so highly redacted or incomplete as to be effectively useless, or if the, quote, real files do come out, Republicans will be ready to say, we don't even really trust that these are legitimate documents. Do you think that either of those scenarios is likely or possible?

Adelita Grijalva (42:50)

Absolutely. Absolutely, I do. And more and more, being here in Washington and seeing how, like, the truth is spun in some crazy ways, like we, myself and members of the Democratic Women's Caucus marched together to Speaker Johnson's office. There was an A frame, like one of those little, like little tiny A frames with a foam sort of display on it that was moved over to one side. There was a police officer there, and he said. He put his hands on one of the members and she said, do not touch me. I'm a member of Congress. He moved to one side. We stood there at the podium, not at his door, and. And ended up going back out into the rotunda. And one of the spins, I heard that that was like the January 6th invasion. I'm like, oh, my gosh. We were literally there. I'm so glad that someone was filming the entire time, because that's the kind of stuff that you just have to scratch your head and go, how does that come out of your mouth with you having a straight face? I mean, have you been lying so often that you just don't even recognize the truth if it comes up and bites you?

David Pakman (44:05)

Does this disillusion you in a sense? Like, you know, I know a lot of people who are running right now. Our friend Dan Ko announced today that he's running for the seat that Seth Moulton is vacating in Massachusetts. And I'm just kind of in this mindset of I would be so disillusioned about my ability to be an effective representative for my constituents, not because I don't want to be, not because they don't deserve it, but because of the dysfunction that is taking place. I mean, is it. You haven't even been sworn in yet. If I were you, I'd be. Would be extraordinarily discouraged.

Adelita Grijalva (44:37)

You know, I'm very hopeful. I have been welcomed by every member of the Democratic Caucus, the Women's Caucus, the Hispanic Caucus, especially the Progressive Caucus, who supported me from very early on in our campaign. And there are a lot of really good people here that all they want to do is good work. And I am very optimistic at the special that's coming up in November and also for the midterms, because I do think that the general public can see that this is com. This. What is happening here is a complete attack on our democracy like that Trump continues to be able to rewrite history, to manipulate information. I mean, a bedrock of our democracy is free and fair elections. And so if this speaker can do this to me, what will he do to others? And so what he has done by trying to obstruct my swearing in is really detrimental to him. And any of the arguments that come up, because even on my socials, which, you know, we have a lot more progressives than everybody else. At first they said, well, wait till her race is certified. She's, you know, putting the cart before the horse, blah, blah, blah. So now it's certified. What are we waiting for? And I, we had a press conference with all of the Arizona delegate, Democratic delegation. Everyone was there with me. And the Hispanic Caucus was there. And I really, who should have been there, is everyone in our Arizona delegation. Because regardless of party, you should want the people in our state to be represented and have services. And that's the biggest issue right now. I'm sitting in my dad's old office. It'll be mine for, like, the next 14 months or so. Completely empty. I have phones that don't connect to anything. We have, you know, screens for computers. With no computers, I have a key to a space. That's it. I. And in district, you know, people are going up to my dad's old offices and pulling on the door, asking for help. It breaks my heart that there is nobody there. I can't enter into leases People can't just, you know, reopen an office. You need staff, right? You need, like, all of the services available. Do you know that when I come into this building here at the Longworth, I stand in line through security and people are like, aren't you a member of Congress? Apparently not yet, because here I am. I can get into places with other members. We had a big showing walking down the steps of the Capitol. I was stopped at security until AOC walked by and I was like, hey, can I hitch a ride with you? Because I can't get past. So having to be validated by other members who are so gracious. Everyone has been so kind. Staff has been so welcoming. But it is a reminder every day, every time I leave this building that I am not a member. Not until Johnson does his job.

David Pakman (48:03)

Bottom line, do you think when the shutdown ends, you'll be sworn in right away? I mean, is that going to kind of be the end of this?

Adelita Grijalva (48:08)

You know, if he doesn't, then they'll be. It'll help a legal case, that's for sure.

David Pakman (48:16)

Yeah.

Adelita Grijalva (48:16)

Yeah.

David Pakman (48:17)

All right, well, listen, we're watching it very closely and anxiously awaiting you're swearing in and these subsequent votes. We've been speaking with Republic representative elect for Arizona 7th congressional district, Adelita Grijalva. Thank you so much for your time. I know it's been busy and we're going to follow all of it.

Adelita Grijalva (48:34)

Thank you. Gracias.

David Pakman (48:36)

Our sponsor, Magic Spoon, has been with us a long time. They do the high protein, zero sugar cereals and treats, nostalgically reinventing some of my favorite childhood snacks. Many of you know, for me, cereal was not breakfast, it was a snack. And that is still the case. And what Magic Spoon has done is taken your favorite sugary cereals from when you were a kid and turned them into something you can feel good about. Magic Spoon is also launching a brand new high protein granola, true to the Magic Spoon promise, packed with protein, crunchy, 13 grams of protein, zero added sugars. And in delicious flavors like dark chocolate, almond, honey almond and peanut butter. They've got their high protein treats as well. Crispy, crunchy, airy, with 12 grams of protein in many flavors. And of course, if you don't love Magic Spoon as much as I do, and our team does, Magic Spoon will refund all of your money, no questions asked. Get $5 off your next order at magic spoon.com/pacman or look for Magic Spoon on Amazon or in your nearest grocery store. The link is in the description 85 year old Nancy Pelosi, Democratic Congresswoman, obliterated a right wing reporter who tried to ambush her with a January six conspiracy theory. The question was, are you worried that you'll end up in trouble because you refused to deploy the national guard on January 6th? And Pelosi turns around and says, shut up, I didn't do that. It's up to the President, not the speaker of the House. Republicans and Maga are furious. Oh, she's treating the reporters so poorly. I will discuss that in a moment. Here is how the conversation went.

Adelita Grijalva (50:29)

Congresswoman Pelosi, are you at all concerned that the new January 6th committee will find you liable for that day?

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (50:35)

Are you at all concerned about the new January 6th committee finding you liable for that day? Why did you refuse the national guard on January 6th?

David Pakman (50:46)

Shut up. I did not refuse the National Guard. The President didn't send it.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (50:50)

Why are you coming here with Republican.

David Pakman (50:52)

Talking points as if you're a serious journalist?

Adelita Grijalva (50:54)

The American people want to know.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (50:56)

We still have questions. Thank you.

David Pakman (51:00)

This grin on the face of the reporter, people who are watching the video see the reporter turned around and is now she's got this shit eating grin grin on her face. It tells you just about everything that this is about. Now let's take it piece by piece without hesitating or appeasing, Nancy Pelosi cut through a bad faith, tired argument in five seconds flat, which is, it's not up to the speaker, it's up to the President. That's the factual part of it. Now of course the right is furious because Nancy Pelosi was mean, she was nasty, she was unhinged because an 85 year old woman ambushed by this Smurf reporter wasn't willing to indulge the false premise of the question and now they're saying it's bullying. Now these are the same people who worship Trump for calling reporters disgusting and horrible and enemy of the people. They don't care about civility, they care about control. And so people should be treated exactly as they deserve. If you are a reporter that asks Trump a follow up question based in fact and Trump says you're nasty and tries to get your press credentials stripped, we have a problem with that. If on the other hand, you are someone that just yells a conspiracy question at Nancy Pelosi on the street, she doesn't try to get you fired, she doesn't try to strip you of your credentials or livelihood, but she says shut up. The premise of your question is false. All of a sudden now they're concerned, you can't debate people that are just lying to your face. And you shouldn't humor people that are pushing propaganda in this way to try to get clicks and get a reaction. And you know, if you can make any criticism here of Nancy Pelosi, it's that she took the bait. In a sense. Part of what the reporter wanted, and you can tell that from that grin, is she wanted to trigger Nancy Pelosi and she succeeded in that way. But then they go and they say, oh my goodness, she got so triggered, you got to shut them down quickly. And of course, it is a lie. Nancy Pelosi refusing the National Guard, refusing to deploy the National Guard on January 6, 2021 is one of the most debunked myths of the entire January six narrative. It was antifa, debunked. The FBI set it up debunked. It was Nancy Pelosi who didn't deploy the National Guard. Completely and totally debunked. It is not under the purview of the speaker of the House. She had no authority to send troops to. She had no authority to reject troops. That was Donald Trump's job. But MAGA doesn't like that. And so what MAGA does is they keep repeating the lie and it gets some of their audience to believe it. They're angry, they're confused. And the most telling part of this clip is this last frame, the smug, self satisfied little smirk after being publicly humiliated. It is theater and it's the face of someone who knows she's lying. But I got a reaction from Nancy Pelosi. They want to be respected, but they're spreading misinformation. They want to be treated like journalists, but they're just propagandists at the end of the day. And so Nancy Pelosi, should she have blown up or not? Let me know in the comment, was Nancy Pelosi right or should she have maintained her composure? But she did treat this individual exactly how she deserves to be treated, which is you're a clown. Wasting our time about four years debunked conspiracy theories. Cringe edgelord JD Vance couldn't help himself and kind of self cucked during a bizarre interview with Real America's Voice. I'm going to explain. Yesterday we went over these leaked text messages or telegram messages from local Republican leaders where they said things such as I love Hitler, among others. J.D. vance was asked about it and he just kind of goes, not a real issue. It's kids in a chat room.

JD Vance (55:18)

By focusing on what kids are saying in a group chat. Grow up I'm sorry. Focus on the real issues. Don't focus what on what kids say in group chats. But there's another angle to this that I just have to be honest about. I mean, I'm like an old guy at this point. I'm 41 years old. I have three kids. You know, we. I grew up in a different world, right? Where not most of what I. The stupid things that I did when I was a teenager and a young adult, they're not on the Internet. Like I'm gonna tell my kids, especially my boys, don't put things on the Internet like, be careful with what you post. If you put something in a group chat, assume that some scumbag is gonna leak it in an effort to try to cause you. You harm or cause your family harm. But the reality is that kids do stupid things, especially young boys. They tell edgy young boys kids jokes like, that's what kids do. And I really don't want us to grow up in a country where a kid telling a stupid joke, telling a very offensive stupid joke is caused to ruin their lives. And at some point we're all, all going to have to say, enough of this BS.

David Pakman (56:20)

All right, so there's like 10 issues here. Now when, when JD Vance says, should we ruin someone's life over something they said as a little kid? Well, let's get to the little kid thing in a second. We're not necessarily talking about ruining lives, but the question is, should local Republican chapters and local Republican offices be led by people saying I love Hitler in a group chat? It's not about ruining your life. It should they be leading the Republican Party. But J.D. vance is painting this like it was teenagers saying stupid stuff online. That is not what happened. These were not middle schoolers or high schoolers. These were state and local Republican leaders from Young Republicans. They are directly connected to the Republican Party's national infrastructure. In fact, if JD Vance ends up being the future of MAGA and runs in 2028, it is likely that some of the people in this telegram saying stuff like I love Hitler would be working for JD Vance. The types of people JD Vance wants you to believe that it's an 11 year old video gamer who said the N word while playing World of Warcraft. These are local Republican leaders and they're the types of people that might run J.D. vance's New Hampshire operation in a 2028 campaign. They are chairs and vice chairs of Young Republican chapters in Texas, Florida and New York. They are campaign staffers, they are consultants. They are aides to sitting Republican lawmakers. In other words, it's the next generation of Republican leadership. Some of them are in their mid-30s. Joe Maligno, who's one of the people in the group chat, is 35 years old. Peter Junta is 31 years old. Trump does this to Trump often will talk about his, his children, and he'll go, you know, they're going after Don Jr. He's a, he's a good kid. He's a good kid. Don Jr. Is like 46 years old or something like that. Hold on, let me be precise. I always forget. 47 years old. And Trump goes. Whenever they go after. These are kids, these are good kids. JD Vance didn't limit his inane and dilapidated commentary just to the isle of Hitler chat. He also talked about political violence, and he's continuing to insist most political violence comes from the left. I know you all know this.

JD Vance (58:36)

It does not that real unity comes from acknowledging the reality of the situation that we're in.

Bernie Sanders (58:42)

Right.

JD Vance (58:42)

Unity requires everybody being on the same page, having some common commonality of values. And real unity requires us to acknowledge the fact that while, yes, there are crazies on both sides, we have a country of 330 million people, you're gonna go to find crazies on either side. Political violence is just a statistical fact. It's a bigger problem on the left. And if you had, God forbid, somebody on the left who was assassinated, yeah, I'm sure that you could find one person who would maybe celebrate it or one person who would be offensive. But the fact that Maine, it became mainstream to celebrate Charlie's death, to talk about the fact that he maybe deserved to die because he had said hateful.

David Pakman (59:21)

Things like that just wasn't happening. It never became mainstream to celebrate Charlie Kirk's death. No serious left commentator celebrated his death. There were some people who made like random civilians who made social media posts, some of whom lost their jobs. It was never mainstream to celebrate Charlie Kirk's death. What is he talking about? But the real issue I have is that he's going back to this trope of most political violence in the US Is for from the left. If you look at any major data set, so you look at the FBI data, you go, oh, I don't like that. Well, look at the Department of Homeland Security. Oh, I don't like that. Well, look at the adl. I don't like the adl. Look at csis. They all show the same thing Right wing extremists are doing. Most American political violence in the United States, the ADL has it at over 75% of extremist murders came from the right, only 4% from the left. None of these are justified, but they're overwhelmingly from the right. CSIS says 2/3 of terrorist plots or attacks since 1994 were right wing. That's like 67%. Only 13% were left wing. We got to do away with the left wings. One left wing ones too, but they're a much smaller portion. You look at FBI or DHS data, both of them identify white supremacist and far right domestic terrorism as the most persistent and lethal threat to the country. They are lying about reality because reality makes them look really bad. And so the truth is think about the truth and the story JD Vance is telling you. The truth is most political violence is right wing in the United States and the people involved in the Telegram chat are state and local Republican leaders and aides and staffers. J.D. vance is telling you these were kids in a chat room whose lives shouldn't be ruined and that most political violence is coming from the left. How do we come together and solve any problem in this country if we have one side that is giving you a version of reality that has no connection whatsoever to the facts? I would argue we can't. I don't know how we would do it. On the bonus show today, we will talk about visas getting revoked for foreigners, by the way, over comments they made about Charlie Kirk's death. We will talk about the U.S. capitol Police investigating a flag with a swastika in a Republican representative's office. And a judge has stopped Donald Trump's planned layoffs of federal workers during the shutdown, saying they are against the law. When has something being against the law ever stopped Donald Trump from doing it anyway? Well, we've got to consider that. But we will discuss all of those stories and more when producer Pat joins me on the bonus show. Sign up@join pacman.com and make sure you're also getting my free daily newsletter via substack substack.david pakman.com See you on the bonus show. New show tomorrow.