Will The Diddy Verdict Hinder More Victims From Coming Forward?

Summary

The Downfall Of Diddy | Episode: "Will The Diddy Verdict Hinder More Victims From Coming Forward?"

In this compelling episode of The Downfall Of Diddy, host Tony Bruski engages in a deep-dive analysis of the recent verdict in the high-profile case against Sean 'P Diddy' Combs. The episode, released on July 18, 2025, scrutinizes the jury's decision, exploring whether the outcome may deter future victims from stepping forward. Featuring expert insights from defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis, the discussion unpacks the complexities surrounding the case, societal perceptions of trafficking, and the broader implications for the #MeToo movement.

Introduction

Tony Bruski sets the stage by highlighting the disconnect between popular perceptions of sex trafficking and its legal definition. He emphasizes that trafficking doesn't necessarily involve the stereotypical imagery of chains and basements but can manifest in more complex, psychologically entangled scenarios.

Tony Bruski [03:01]: "We need to stop pretending that the term trafficking lands the same way for everyone... it requires a commercial sex act obtained through force, fraud, or coercion."

Overview of the Verdict

Bruski delves into the details of the Sean 'P Diddy' Combs trial, questioning why the jury found it challenging to reconcile Diddy's extravagant lifestyle with the allegations of abuse and coercion. He suggests that the jurors' preconceived notions of what constitutes trafficking may have influenced their skepticism.

Juror Perceptions and Misconceptions of Trafficking

The discussion pivots to how jurors' expectations, shaped by media portrayals of trafficking, might have created cognitive dissonance when faced with the reality of the case.

Eric Faddis [06:22]: "The jury could have conflated and looked at this holistically... perhaps the jury saw the opposite of what their expectations were."

Bruski adds that the glamour and public persona of Diddy may have overshadowed the victim's experiences of trauma and coercion, leading jurors to doubt the validity of the accusations.

The Impact of Diddy's Glamorous Lifestyle on the Jury's Decision

Bruski posits that Diddy's affluent and high-profile lifestyle may have inadvertently harmed Cassie's credibility in the eyes of the jury. He raises the possibility that jurors struggled to separate the glitz from the alleged abuse, questioning whether the victim's access to luxury undermined her portrayal as a coerced individual.

Tony Bruski [08:01]: "The prosecution played it too safe by limiting victims... you have to consider whether their glamorous image swayed the jury."

Defense Attorney Eric Faddis' Analysis

Eric Faddis provides a nuanced perspective on the trial's shortcomings. He critiques the prosecution's approach, suggesting that they failed to present a broader pattern of abusive behavior by limiting testimonies to a minimal number of victims.

Eric Faddis [11:28]: "The prosecution could have included several other alleged victims to bolster the notion that this wasn't just one-offs but a consistent pattern."

Faddis also touches on the potential impact of the jury's shifting attitudes post-#MeToo, indicating that societal backlash may have influenced the verdict.

Possible Prosecutor Shortcomings

Bruski questions why the prosecution didn't call additional witnesses or present more evidence to substantiate the claims, drawing parallels to the Epstein case where broader conspiracies were suspected but not thoroughly explored.

Tony Bruski [13:19]: "Was this another plan of 'let's make it look like we're doing our job' without delving deeper into potential larger conspiracies?"

Faddis acknowledges the delicate balance prosecutors must maintain to avoid overwhelming the jury, referencing the Harvey Weinstein case as an example where excessive victim testimonies led to appellate issues.

Eric Faddis [12:37]: "You have to be careful about piling on... the appellate court felt it was too prejudicial."

Broader Implications for #MeToo Movement and Future Cases

The episode explores the potential chilling effect this verdict may have on future victims considering coming forward. Faddis expresses concern that the difficulty in proving such cases could discourage genuine victims from seeking justice.

Eric Faddis [16:55]: "I think that really the momentum has shifted... it could have a deterrent effect on alleged victims coming forward."

Bruski reflects on the cultural shift, suggesting that the pendulum of the #MeToo movement may be swinging back, leading to increased skepticism and higher barriers for victims to be believed.

Conclusion and Insights

Tony Bruski encapsulates the episode by asserting that the verdict against Diddy exposes fundamental issues in how society perceives abuse and consent, especially when intertwined with celebrity culture. The case underscores the necessity for broader societal understanding that abuse can occur in any setting, regardless of outward appearances.

Tony Bruski [17:20]: "If abuse doesn't look like the worst-case scenario, many people just don't see it at all... justice will always come with an asterisk."

He emphasizes that the case serves as a cultural pulse check, revealing that survivors who don't fit a specific mold may struggle to receive the validation and justice they deserve. The episode concludes by urging listeners to reflect on these dynamics and participate in ongoing discussions about belief, justice, and societal perceptions of abuse.

Key Takeaways

• Discrepancy Between Perception and Reality: The legal definition of trafficking is often at odds with public perception, leading to potential biases in juror decisions.

• Impact of Lifestyle on Credibility: The accused's glamorous lifestyle may inadvertently undermine the victim's credibility in the eyes of the jury.

• Prosecutorial Strategy: The prosecution's limited approach in presenting additional victims may have weakened the case's overall impact.

• Societal Shifts: Changing societal attitudes post-#MeToo may influence juror perception, potentially affecting future cases negatively.

• Chilling Effect on Victims: The verdict may deter future victims from coming forward, fearing skepticism and lack of justice.

Join the Conversation

Tony invites listeners to share their thoughts and continue the discussion on their YouTube page by searching for Hidden Killers with Tony Bruski. He encourages engagement through comments and subscriptions to support the show's continued investigative reporting.

---

This summary encapsulates the key points and discussions from the episode, providing an insightful overview for those who haven't listened while preserving the depth and nuances of the original content.

Transcript

[Ryan Seacrest]

It is Ryan Seacrest here. There was a recent social media trend which consisted of flying on a plane with no music, no movies, no entertainment. But a better trend would be going to chumbacasino.com it's like having a mini social casino in your pocket. Chumba casino has over 100 online casino style games, all absolutely free. It's the most fun you can have online and on a plane. So grab your free welcome bonus [e-mail] sponsored by Chumba Casino.

[Tony Bruski]

No purchase necessary. VGW Group Void where prohibited by law.

[Eric Faddis]

21 + terms and conditions apply.

[Thomas Keller]

This podcast is sponsored by IQ Bar. Your favorite clean, functional, delicious nutrition brand is Raising the Bar with a little help from Thomas Keller, Michelin Star chef of the French Laundry. IQ Bar and Thomas Keller have teamed up to create a salted Caramel chip protein bar and Yuzu Mango Hydration mix with toasted Macadamia nuts. Rich caramel flavor and brain boosting nutrients. This bar is like having a Michelin Star meal in your pocket. Pair it with the Tastebud Tingling Yuzu Mango IQ Mix Hydration mix packed with magnesium and adaptogens to improve clarity and mood. With Keller's culinary excellence and IQ Bar's commitment to great taste and clean ingredients, this limited edition collaboration is simply mwah. And the best part is that 10% of sales go directly to Chef Keller's nonprofit mentor that supports aspiring young chefs. Great taste, great nutrition, great mission. Go to iqbar.com today and enter promo code KELLER20 to get 20% off all IQ Bar products plus free shipping. That's iqbar.com, promo code KELLER20.

[Ryan Seacrest]

Hello, it is Ryan. And we could all use an extra bright spot in our day, couldn't we? Just to make up for things like sitting in traffic, doing the dishes, counting your steps, you know, all the mundane stuff. That is why I'm such a big fan of Chumba Casino. Chumba Casino has all your favorite social casino style games that you can play for free anytime, anywhere with daily bonuses. So sign up [e-mail] that's chumbacasino.com no purchase necessary.

[Tony Bruski]

VGW Group void where prohibited by law.

[Eric Faddis]

21 + terms and conditions apply.

[Thomas Keller]

This podcast is sponsored by IQ Bar. Your favorite clean, functional, delicious nutrition brand is Raising the Bar. With a little help from Thomas Keller, Michelin Star chef of the French Laundry. IQ Bar and Thomas Keller have teamed up to create a salted Caramel chip protein bar and Yuzu Mango Hydration mix with toasted Macadamia nuts rich caramel flavor and brain boosting nutrients, this bar is like having a Michelin star meal in your pocket. Pair it with the Tastebud Tingling Yuzu Mango IQ Mix Hydration mix packed with magnesium and adaptogens to improve clarity and mood. With Keller's culinary excellence and IQ Bar's commitment to great taste and clean ingredients, this limited edition collaboration is simply mwah. And the best part is that 10% of sales go directly to Chef Keller's nonprofit mentor that supports aspiring young chefs. Great taste, great nutrition, great mission. Go to iqbar.com today and enter promo code KELLER20 to get 20% off all IQ Bar products plus free shipping. That's iqbar.com promo code KELLER20.

[Tony Bruski]

This is continuing coverage of United States versus Sean Diddy Combs from the Hidden Killers podcast and True Crime today. At this point, we need to stop pretending that the term S trafficking lands the same way for everyone. Because if you say it to a juror, what comes to mind probably looks more like a taken movie plot or a windowless van than a very real, messy and psychologically complex version that played out in the federal courtroom where Sean Diddy Combs stood trial. And that, right there, may be the root of the problem. The prosecution told the jury what the law actually says, that trafficking doesn't require chains or cages or foreign passports. All it requires is a commercial sex act obtained through force, fraud, or coercion. That's it. But the jury, they didn't buy it. Not according to them. Not because they didn't hear it, but because it didn't match their movie in their head. And that disconnect might be the biggest story this case has to offer. So today we're digging into how this verdict happened and why it's not just about evidence, but expectation. Why the jury couldn't reconcile a glamorous lifestyle with the idea of victimhood. Why Cassie's access to limos, champagne, and the illusion of power may have done more to hurt her credibility than help it. And why the very real trauma she described, including violence, manipulation and orchestrated sex acts, wasn't enough to break through a deeply held cultural belief. If you weren't literally locked up, you could have walked away. Joining me is defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis. We're not tiptoeing here. We're gonna talk about whether this verdict is a reflection of social backlash. To me, too. Whether the prosecution played it too safe by limiting victims and whether there was quiet fear, even intimidation, shaping the jury's subconscious in the background. We even go there Was this whole case designed to fail? Was it about justice, about making it look like justice was being served without exposing who else might fall if the case really was cracked wide open. So I asked Eric, is this what happens when celebrity nostalgia, fear of retaliation, and public skepticism all collide inside a jury box? And more importantly, where does that leave the people still waiting to be believed 100%.

[Eric Faddis]

You know, trafficking in the legal context might be different than trafficking folks have seen, you know, in the news and in movies and things like that. Like you said, it's not a bunch of people, you know, bound with chains and their sex slaves and engaged for years of their life. That's not what the legal definition requires. All the legal definition requires in this case was that there be some commercial sex act by force, fraud, or coercion that was enough to prove trafficking. And I just wonder if the jury's preconceived notions about that, that loaded term trafficking were sort of overbore. Their contemplation of what the actual jury instructions, what the actual law says. And that happens all the time in court.

[Tony Bruski]

Obviously, to get their point across, they needed to call. They needed to call some of the Jane Does. They needed to hear what went on and why it was coercive and why it was abuse. But again, juries seem to have, and people in general seem to sometimes have a difficulty understanding what goes from a normal relationship to a controlling relationship to a coercively controlling relationship to an abusive, coercively controlling relationship where you really don't see the way out. I think it's kind of like red or green for a lot of people. Like, well, either you're in it or you're out of it. And that's obviously not all of the case here. Do you think the jury also struggled? And I wonder if there's an element of jealousy in there with some jurors as well, of, look, you live this, like, to Cassie like you lived like a queen on the outside. I'm not speaking emotionally. You know, she lived a, you know, limos, champagne, millions of dollars. I mean, it was. It was. On the surface, it looked like everyone's dream, if you will, if you want celebrity lifestyle and glitz and glamour. But on the inside, obviously it was horrifically painful, damaging, and traumatic. Was the jury more focused on the physicality of things, of those elements, and then the things that Cassie, in fact did in terms of going along with some of Diddy's things, planning some of these freak offs, were they having a really hard time separating choice versus coercion totally.

[Eric Faddis]

So I think in this trial there was. There's a lot of nuance, right? So, like, there could be dozens of consensual romantic encounters, but all it takes is one non consensual one technically, to convict somebody of sex trafficking, so long as the other elements are met. I think the jury kind of conflates and sort of looked at this holistically. And also maybe there was an expectation that the alleged victim had to be a meek little mouse and had to go into hiding and had to not have money and not have a public life. And perhaps the jury saw the opposite of that and said, hey, that doesn't square with my expectation. There's some cognitive dissonance there. And did that sort of translate into doubt? Perhaps it did.

[Tony Bruski]

Is this a reckoning to a certain extent as well, where the pendulum is swinging back? And I'm not saying this is right. I'm just saying, is this a pendulum swinging back now and the world or the public saying, you have your own agency too? Yes, we know things were bad. It sounds horrible. No one would want that for you. But you weren't literally chained up in a corner and you couldn't get out. You could have left. There are options that you could have taken. Yes, it would have been scary. Y have not been the best thing for anybody, but there were physical ways for you to leave compared to many others who are truly not in that sort of a situation. And you're saying you couldn't get out of this or get out of this. Is this kind of a referendum on that, saying, take more agency and yes, you are an abuse victim, but take more agency because you can't just come back years later and go, this is a really, really horrible guy. When you chose for years to stay with him and keep getting all the perks while enduring the abuse.

[Eric Faddis]

I can't help but wonder if, like you said, Tony, this is in part a function of that pendulum swinging. So we started with the MeToo movement, 20, 15, 16 or so. And, you know, at that point we were saying, hey, let's believe all women and really any kind of accuser within that context. And then over time, I think there was kind of some blowback from that. And the pendulum swung a little bit in the middle. And I think when this trial hit, this Diddy trial, I think that's the point at which the pendulum had really gone to the other. And there are these social pressures and understandings kind of saying, hey, you know, we're looking at this differently now. You had. You had some Choices in their opinion and didn't take those choices.

[Tony Bruski]

Yeah, it's, you know, it's a statement, I think that, you know, it's fair to put out there to a certain extent because we went to believe everyone, no matter what, don't even question that there's another side, which I thought was incredibly unhealthy and insane because people make shit up. And then we went to, okay, you're right, people make shit up. We gotta be, you know, make sure vet this. And now I feel like with this one, it's like he's on video stomping on her head and it's still not enough. So it's like over here, way over here, we have a very hard time staying here in the like reality of life in the middle where things can be reasonably thought out. What do you think that the prosecution could have done different, could have done better? If you're reviewing this and saying, okay, you really want a conviction, here's how you could have had it, here's how you blew it in your own opinion.

[Eric Faddis]

I think the RICO charge was very provable and I think the jury wanted to hear from the co conspirators, the other bad actors involved in that. The prosecution could have called kk, who was the assistant, could have called as a witness Drock, who is security, because allegedly those folks had knowledge of the criminal activity in which Diddy and Bad Boy Entertainment were also sort of engaging in a coordinated way. The prosecution didn't do that on the sex trafficking charges. I think the prosecution could have included several other alleged victims. Can't have too many or else you're going to have an appellate issue. But if you include, you know, a handful of other ones that could really bolster this notion that, hey, this wasn't just two sort of one offs where there were complicated relationships, possibly transactional. This is a pattern among, you know, at least five alleged victims. It can't be the case that all of them are making it up.

[Tony Bruski]

Why didn't they do that? Why didn't they do exactly what you suggested and call those specific people? Is there any reason, is there any logical reason why anything holding them back? Any legal reason holding them back?

[Eric Faddis]

You gotta be a little bit careful as to how much you pile on as a prosecutor. We saw that in the Harvey Weinstein case, the first round where I believe they called six alleged victims. And what the appellate court said was that was that the charges were only based on some of the alleged victims and the other folks, that that was uncharged conduct. It became too prejudicial it created this impression on the jury's mind that he must have done it because he has a propensity to do that. So you gotta be careful about that. And I wonder if that was on the prosecutor's minds. And also just the length of the trial itself. It already went for about two months, and that was only with two alleged victims.

[Tony Bruski]

Here's another one for you. Or was this all. I mean, this is. I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but, you know, on things like this and Epstein, there was so much buzz that there was so many big people that were gonna go down on this. You know, when the government originally brought the charges against Epstein years ago, before they last time, when he killed himself, allegedly, it was a very light charge. It was a slap on the wrist, and it was just like, there's all this evidence, but we gotta look like we're doing our job here. So I'm wondering, was this another plan of let's make it look like we're doing our job here? Diddy was a much big, more large public figure, you know, entrenched in. In people's normal lives, in the lexicon of pop culture. So probably needed to have a little more intention than just, you know, that creepy guy that you guys are really paying attention, know who he is. We got to look like we're doing something. This was Diddy. We gotta do a trial, and is gonna walk away with a very light sentence. I'm wondering how much of this was for show and really wasn't necessarily to actually get to the end of this, but to show that we gotta make it look like it. But we can't go too far, because there's certain people that could go down here beyond Diddy.

[Eric Faddis]

If just hypothetically, the government had that idea that, hey, if we dive into this too deeply, we are going to expose some folks, and for whatever reason they didn't want to do that, then this presentation would make a whole lot of sense, streamlining it, limiting it to two alleged victims who ultimately testified and not really referencing any other stars. There weren't, you know, although the alleged victims in the civil cases have certainly been more vocal about who might be involved. This federal criminal case, we really didn't hear about any other bad actors, although that information exists. And so why didn't we hear about it?

[Tony Bruski]

That's a very good question. Just like the Epstein list has gone, too. One more question on this. If we take the conspiracy angle out of it, do you think fear, or even subconscious fear played a role into the verdict? I Mean, with the allegations that were out there of intimidation, surveillance, and violence, I mean, the jury did, did see what Diddy is capable of doing or has done. He just wasn't being charged for some of it. At that point in time, do you think they're, you know, they're in their mind going, retaliation, violence, things like that. What's going to happen when I get out of here, out of this jury box? I mean, people will figure out who you are. And I wonder if that played a role in this.

[Eric Faddis]

It's an important question. Look, I was just handling a homicide case in Colorado recently. My client, who was completely and was found not guilty. He was a preschool director. He was a rec center manager. He was part of this dad's group. And even then, the potential jurors, when we were asking him about being on the jury, said, hey, I'm worried if I decide a certain way I could receive some kind of retaliation. I'm worried that this person can hurt me. And so that's a preschool director. When we're talking about Diddy, who is on video beating the heck out of a woman, understandably, those considerations could have been in the minds of the jurors.

[Tony Bruski]

Does this discourage any more Diddy accusers from coming forward?

[Eric Faddis]

I think it does. Rightly or wrongly, I think that really the momentum has shifted a little bit. I think folks are realizing, hey, it's kind of hard to prove something at a trial. You can have a really good case on paper. But I just wonder if this is going to have a deterrent effect on alleged victims coming forward. And that would be an absolute shame, especially for the folks who were truly victimized and will never received justice.

[Tony Bruski]

So if you're wondering why a video of Diddy stomping on Cassie wasn't enough, why the jury heard days of testimony and still and coercion and trauma and still said, yeah, but you're not alone. Because the verdict didn't just expose holes in the case. It exposed holes in how we think about abuse, consent, and power. Especially when the abuser's face is your favorite 90s mixtape. Eric laid it out clearly. The prosecution met the legal bar. The law doesn't require a dungeon. It doesn't require chains. It required coercion, and we heard it. But jurors were ready for the kind of coercion that wears diamond watches and smiles for a camera. That was something they were not prepared for. They wanted something more dramatic, more obvious. And when they didn't get it, they hesitated. What the case shows us in the harshest possible light is that if abuse doesn't look like the worst case scenario, many people just don't see it at all. Especially when the victim appears to have agency, especially when she went back, especially when she wasn't weeping on the witness stand. We've somehow decided that if you endure the abuse with any measure of dignity, you must not really be a victim. And let's not ignore the celebrity factor. Diddy wasn't just on trial. His entire cultural legacy was. And whether jurors realized it or not, they were deciding more than guilt. They were deciding whether they were ready to believe that the man who made the soundtrack of their youth could be capable of these sort of monstrous things. And apparently they weren't. The victim wasn't just a courtroom decision or the verdict wasn't just a courtroom decision. It was a cultural pulse check. It told us that the MeToo pendulum is swinging hard in the other direction, and survivors who didn't fit a very specific mold are going to pay the price. That's not a justice issue. That's a belief system issue. And if prosecutors and jurors alike can't see past the surface, can't accept that abuse can happen in mansions and private jets just as easily as in basements and alleyways, then justice will always come with an asterisk. So if we're left with a pretrial or a partial, rather, conviction, an open wound, and a whole lot of questions still hanging in the air, that's what we have. This case isn't over, but the reckoning? Not even close. Tell me your thoughts in the comment section on YouTube. We'd love to hear it. If you're not already on our YouTube page, please go check it out. Search Hidden Killers with Tony Bruski and join us there so you can join in on all of that. And please do hit subscribe. Also hit subscribe on the podcast platforms if that's where you're listening to us. Or vice versa, or both. Even better, you can listen to us in the car and watch us when you can on your phone or your computer or your tv, whatever. Hit subscribe in both places, if you would. It helps us grow the show and we do greatly appreciate it. So we can keep bringing you all this reporting every single day. Until next time, my name is Tony Bruski. We will talk again real soon. Craving Non Stop True Crime Updates Press subscribe now and get the latest cases, analysis and expert commentary delivered straight to your feed only from the Hidden Killers podcast and True Crime Today.

[Ryan Seacrest]

Hey, it's Ryan Seacrest Life comes at you fast, which is why it's important to find some time to relax a little. You time. Enter Chumba Casino. With no download required, you can jump on anytime, anywhere for the chance to redeem some serious prizes. So treat yourself with Chumba Casino and play over 100 online casino style games, all for free. Go to Chumbacasino.com to collect your free welcome bonus. Sponsored by Chumba Casino.

[Tony Bruski]

No purchase necessary. VGW Group Void we're prohibited by law 21 +, terms and conditions apply.

[Thomas Keller]

This podcast is sponsored by iqbar. Your favorite clean, functional, delicious nutrition brand is raising the bar with a little help from Thomas Keller, Michelin Star chef of the French Laundry. IQ Bar and Thomas Keller have teamed up to create a salted caramel chip protein bar and Yuzu Mango Hydration Mix with toasted macadamia nuts, rich caramel flavor and brain boosting nutrients, this bar is like having a Michelin Star meal in your pocket. Pair it with the Tastebud Tingling Yuzu Mango IQ Mix Hydration Mix packed with magnesium and adaptogens to improve clarity and mood. With Keller's culinary excellence and IQ Bar's commitment to great taste and clean ingredients, this limited edition collaboration is simply mwah. And the best part is that 10% of sales go directly to Chef Keller's nonprofit mentor that supports aspiring young chefs. Great taste, great nutrition, great mission. Go to iqbar.com today and enter promo code KELLER20 to get 20% off all IQ Bar products plus free shipping. That's iqbar.com promo code KELLER20 Riley Herbs from 2311.

[Eric Faddis]

Racing here and you know what grinds my gears?

[Tony Bruski]

Waiting for coffee.

[Eric Faddis]

But instead of counting frappes and lattes.

[Thomas Keller]

I fire up Jumba Casino. No apps, no fuss, just fun social casino games to pass the time. By the time my coffee's ready, I've already taken a few victory laps. Next time you're stuck waiting, make it entertaining.

[Tony Bruski]

Play for [e-mail] let's Chumba sponsored by Chumba Casino. No purchase. No necessary VGW Group voidware prohibited by law 21 plus, terms and conditions apply.

[Thomas Keller]

This podcast is sponsored by IQ Bar. Your favorite clean, functional, delicious nutrition brand is raising the bar with a little help from Thomas Keller, Michelin star chef of the French Laundry. IQ Bar and Thomas Keller have teamed up to create a salted caramel chip protein bar and Yuzu Mango Hydration mix with toasted macadamia nuts, rich caramel flavor and brain boosting nutrients, this bar is like having a Michelin Star meal in your pocket. Pair it with the Tastebud Tingling Yuzu Mango IQ Mix Hydration Mix packed with magnesium and adaptogens to improve clarity and mood. With Keller's culinary excellence and IQ Bar's commitment to great taste and clean ingredients, this limited edition collaboration is simply mwah. And the best part is that 10% of sales go directly to Chef Keller's nonprofit mentor that supports aspiring young chefs. Great taste, great nutrition, great mission. Go to iqbar.com today and enter promo code KELLER20 to get 20% off all IQ Bar products plus free shipping. That's iqbar.com, promo code KELLER20.

[Tony Bruski]

Bubba Wallace here from 2311 Racing. Funny thing about being fast.

[Thomas Keller]

You end up waiting a lot.

[Tony Bruski]

First to show up, first in line, then just waiting. Me, I rev up Jumbo casino with over 200 social casino games. No slow lanes here. Why sit around when you can spin? I'm already racing.

[Eric Faddis]

Your turn.

[Tony Bruski]

Play for [e-mail] that's Chumba sponsored by Chumba Casino. No purchase necessary.

[Ryan Seacrest]

VGW Group voidware prohibited by Law21.

[Tony Bruski]

Terms and conditions apply.

[Thomas Keller]

This podcast is sponsored by IQ Bar. Your favorite clean, functional, delicious nutrition brand is Raising the Bar. With a little help from Thomas Keller, Michelin Star chef of the French Laundry. IQ Bar and Thomas Keller have teamed up to create a salted Caramel Chip protein bar and Yuzu Mango Hydration Mix. With toasted Macadamia nuts, rich caramel flavor and brain boosting nutrients, this bar is like having a Michelin Star meal in your pocket. Pair it with the Tastebud Tingling Yuzu Mango IQMIX Hydration Mix packed with magnesium and adaptogens to improve clarity and mood. With Keller's culinary excellence and IQ Bar's commitment to great taste and clean ingredients, this limited edition collaboration is simply mwah. And the best part is that 10% of sales go directly to Chef Keller's nonprofit mentor that supports aspiring young chefs. Great taste, great nutrition, great mission. Go to iqbar.com today and enter promo code KELLER20 to get 20% off all IQ Bar products plus free shipping. That's iqbar.com, promo code KELLER20. This podcast is sponsored by IQ Bar. Your favorite clean, functional, delicious nutrition brand is Raising the bar. With a little help from Thomas Keller, Michelin Star chef of the French Laundry. IQ Bar and Thomas Keller have teamed up to create a Salted Caramel Chip protein bar and Yuzu Mango Hydration Mix. With toasted Macadamia nuts, rich caramel flavor and brain boosting nutrients, this bar is like having a Michelin star meal in your pocket. Pair it with the tastebud Tingling Yuzu Mango IQ Mix Hydration mix packed with magnesium and adaptogens to improve clarity and mood. With Keller's culinary excellence and IQ Bar's commitment to great taste and clean ingredients, this limited edition collaboration is simply mwah. And the best part is that 10% of sales go directly to Chef Keller's nonprofit mentor that supports aspiring young chefs. Great taste, great nutrition, great mission. Go to iqbar.com today and enter promo code KELLER20 to get 20% off all IQ Bar products plus free shipping. That's iqbar.com promo code KELLER20.

[Tony Bruski]

Step into the world of power, loyalty and luck. I'm gonna make him an offer he can't refuse with family. Cannolis and spins mean everything. Now you want to get mixed up.

[Thomas Keller]

In the family business.

[Tony Bruski]

Introducing the [e-mail] test your luck on the shadowy world of the Godfather slots. Someday I will call upon you to do service for me. Play the Godfather [e-mail] Welcome to the family. No purchase necessary. VGW Group void. We're prohibited by law.

[Eric Faddis]

21 plus terms and conditions apply.

[Thomas Keller]

This podcast is sponsored by IQ Bar. Your favorite clean, functional, delicious nutrition brand is raising the bar. With a little help from Thomas Keller, Michelin star chef of the French Laundry. IQ Bar and Thomas Keller have teamed up to create a salted caramel chip protein bar and Yuzu Mango hydration mix. With toasted macadamia nuts, rich caramel flavor and brain boosting nutrients, this bar is like having a Michelin star meal in your pocket. Pair it with the Tastebud Tingling Yuzu Mango IQ Mix Hydration mix packed with magnesium and adaptogens to improve clarity and mood. With Keller's culinary excellence and IQ Bar's commitment to great taste and clean ingredients, this limited edition collaboration is simply mwah. And the best part is that 10% of sales go directly to Chef Keller's nonprofit mentor that supports aspiring young chefs. Great taste, great nutrition, great mission. Go to iqbar.com today and enter promo code KELLER20 to get 20% off all Iqbar products plus free shipping. That's iqbar.com, promo code KELLER20.

[Ryan Seacrest]

Hello, it is Ryan and I was on a flight the other day playing one of my favorite social spin slot games on chumbacasino.com I looked over the person sitting next to me and you know what they were doing? They were also playing Chumba Casino. Everybody's loving having fun with it. Chumba Casino's home to HUD hundreds of casino style games that you can play for free anytime, anywhere. So sign up [e-mail] to claim your free welcome bonus. That's chumbacasino.com and live the Chumba Life.

[Tony Bruski]

Sponsored by Chumba Casino. No purchase necessary. VGW Group Void where prohibited by law 21 + terms and conditions apply.

[Thomas Keller]

This podcast is sponsored by IQ Bar. Your favorite clean, functional, delicious nutrition brand is raising the bar with a little help from Thomas Keller, Michelin Star Chef of the French Laundry. IQ Bar and Thomas Keller have teamed up to create a salted Caramel chip protein bar and Yuzu Mango Hydration Mix. With toasted Macadamia nuts, rich caramel flavor and brain boosting nutrients, this bar is like having a Michelin Star meal in your pocket. Pair it with the Taste Bud Tingling Yuzu Mango IQ Mix Hydration Mix packed with magnesium and adaptogens to improve clarity and mood. With Keller's culinary excellence and IQ Bar's commitment to great taste and clean ingredients, this limited edition collaboration is simply and the best part is that 10% of sales go directly to Chef Keller's nonprofit mentor that supports aspiring young chefs. Great taste, Great nutrition, Great mission. Go to iqbar.com today and enter promo code KELLER20 to get 20% off all IQ Bar products plus free shipping. That's iqbar.com, promo code KELLER20. This podcast is sponsored by IQ Bar. Your favorite clean, functional delicious nutrition brand is raising the bar with a little help from Thomas Keller, Michelin Star Chef of the French Laundry. IQ Bar and Thomas Keller have teamed up to create a salted Caramel chip protein bar and Yuzu Mango Hydration Mix. With toasted Macadamia nuts, rich caramel flavor and brain boosting nutrients, this bar is like having a Michelin Star meal in your pocket. Pair it with the Taste Bud Tingling Yuzu Mango IQ Mix Hydration Mix packed with magnesium and adaptogens to improve clarity and mood. With Keller's culinary excellence and IQ Bar's commitment to great taste and clean ingredients, this limited edition collaboration is simply and the best part is that 10% of sales go directly to Chef Keller's nonprofit mentor that supports aspiring young chefs. Great taste, Great nutrition, Great mission. Go to iqbar.com today and enter promo code KELLER20 to get 20% off all IQ Bar products plus free shipping. That's iqbar.com promo code KELLER20.