The Flo Show, No Filter
Episode: Why Were Diddy's Top Associates Never Called to Testify?
Host: Flo
Date: September 3, 2025
Overview
In this candid and unscripted episode, Flo investigates why Diddy’s top associates were never called to testify in his high-profile trial. The conversation explores possible reasons for the absence of key witnesses, including figures like Jaguar Wright and Christina Korn, and expresses deep skepticism over the transparency and intentions behind the trial’s proceedings. Flo also covers a breaking press conference by Epstein’s victims, reflecting on justice, accountability, and media obfuscation. The tone is raw, community-focused, and full of pointed questions about elite impunity in the justice system.
Key Discussion Points & Insights
1. Jaguar Wright’s Disappearance During the Trial
- Observation: Jaguar Wright, once vocal about inside knowledge of Diddy, was entirely absent during the trial and not called as a witness.
- “We heard from Jaguar Wright and then, all of a sudden, once the trial started, she disappeared.” (08:30)
- Theories Explored:
- She was silenced or threatened.
- She sought to remove herself from lawsuits due to prior incarceration (not involved in events alleged).
- Community theories: paid off, scared off, or hiding her own wrongdoings.
- “I just thought she would be more vocal or more seen throughout the trial, let alone maybe even like a…witness. How could she had not been a witness if she seen all this crap?” (1:02:10)
2. Epstein Case Press Conference & Congressional Action
- Details:
A major press conference involving Epstein victims is organized by Reps. Ro Khanna (D-CA) and Thomas Massie (R-KY), pushing for the DOJ to release Epstein files.- Notable Quote:
“There are a lot of rich powerful men, politicians, business leaders, etc., who have committed abuse and who have not been held accountable. That’s what we’re going to hear on September 3, which is today, and people are going to be outraged.”
— Rep. Ro Khanna (22:00)
- Notable Quote:
- Victims’ Perspective:
- The victims, now adults, feel forced to take control due to lack of institutional justice:
- “We not little girls no more. The victims have become women…they know ain’t nobody giving them no justice, so they’re grabbing justice by the balls and taking it upon themselves.” (17:20)
- The victims, now adults, feel forced to take control due to lack of institutional justice:
- Obstruction Noted:
- Multiple articles mention the event’s significance but fail to tell the public where to watch it, which Flo finds suspicious.
- “Why would you do all that explaining and not simply tell us where the hell to watch? …It’s almost like they’re trying to sabotage the press conference.” (36:20)
- Multiple articles mention the event’s significance but fail to tell the public where to watch it, which Flo finds suspicious.
- How to Watch:
- Actual info found only via outside search: YouTube, 10:30AM Eastern:
- “Search ‘Watch live reps Massey and Khanna hold press conference with Epstein victims’ on YouTube.” (45:10)
- Actual info found only via outside search: YouTube, 10:30AM Eastern:
3. Flaws & Oddities in the Diddy Trial
- Absence of Key Associates and Powerful Figures:
- Major figures involved in the alleged enterprise (Christina Korn, Drock, Uncle Paulie, Jimmy Iovine) were not subpoenaed or questioned.
- “None of the powerful people involved had to say a word…but all the pawns, the people that were used…were forced to speak and talk about their deepest, darkest, dirtiest secrets in front of the whole world.” (1:13:00)
- Only lesser-involved parties and victims were compelled to testify.
- Even if these associates pled the Fifth, their mere absence is “highly questionable” and suggests institutional protection.
- “Even if they got up there and pled the fifth, the fact they weren't called is highly questionable.” — Chocolate (Listener) (1:24:20)
- Major figures involved in the alleged enterprise (Christina Korn, Drock, Uncle Paulie, Jimmy Iovine) were not subpoenaed or questioned.
- Lack of Transparency and Judicial Process Questions:
- Flo notes that the jury was not sequestered, which appeared suspicious from day one.
- Lead prosecutor, Comey, fired mid-case amid accusations of protecting celebrity interests.
- No justification given for not calling top insiders; Flo speculates on possible deals or relationships between defense and prosecution.
- “There was some type of shady reason why they weren't called. Especially the fact that…the government never even explained why they weren't called, never addressed it or anything.” (1:23:30)
4. Jaguar Wright’s Request for Lawsuit Removal
- Clarification:
The host revises earlier confusion: Wright is seeking removal from a civil suit (Parham v. Perez & Mitchell), citing incarceration during the incident in question.- “I was incarcerated at the time of the events alleged…and are said to have occurred. I was in custody at Cook County Jail from January 11, 2018 until April 11, 2018.” — Jaguar Wright’s statement (1:08:40)
- Linked Cases:
The suit also names other celebrities supposedly involved in an assault, all denying involvement—further muddying public perception of accountability.
5. Community Sentiment & Calls for Action
- Justice System Skepticism:
Listeners and Flo express continual doubt that real justice (for either the victims in the Diddy or Epstein cases) will be achieved.- “I'm glad that the victims are getting a chance to talk. But the people who need to make something happen, are they gonna make something happen?” (48:30)
- “At this point, our last line of defense against this ass system is Judge Subramanian.” (1:28:10)
- Power Dynamics:
The trial is framed as a metaphor for systemic inequality—regular people face humiliation while elites evade scrutiny.
Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments
-
On the Diddy Trial’s Selective Transparency:
“The people who committed the crimes, the people who were talked about in this testimony…not one of them was made to talk. Did y'all ever notice that?” (1:13:54) -
Flo’s Frustration:
“It just was strange. The trial moves so fast, we didn’t have time to harp on it…but at the very first episode…one of the first things I said was…how the—that is, the thing I worried about the most was that the jurors weren't sequestered. And it made absolutely no sense.” (1:11:10) -
Comment from Listener, Chocolate:
“Even if they got up there and pled the fifth, the fact they weren’t called is highly questionable.” (1:24:20) -
On Powerful Associates’ Silence:
“None of the perpetrators, none of the, quote, unquote, let’s just say elite, the people who were at the top of this pyramid, not one of them was made to talk.” (1:13:29) -
Press Conference Sabotage:
“Why would you not...you give us all that information, you don’t say tune in to the press conference on this channel…does that make any sense?” (36:26)
Important Timestamps
- 08:30 – Jaguar Wright’s disappearance and speculations on silencing.
- 17:20 – Epstein victims determined to seize justice themselves.
- 22:00 – Rep. Khanna’s statement on elite impunity.
- 36:20 – Flo notices press conference coverage obfuscation.
- 45:10 – How to stream the Epstein victims’ press conference.
- 1:02:10 – Flo reflects on expectations of Wright’s involvement.
- 1:08:40 – Jaguar Wright’s removal request from lawsuit.
- 1:11:10 – Trial oddities: Not sequestering the jury.
- 1:13:00 – None of Diddy’s real associates are ever called to testify.
- 1:23:30 – Flo speculates on legal protection for the accused associates.
- 1:28:10 – Only the judge remains as a hope for justice.
Tone and Atmosphere
- Flo’s energy is direct, unapologetically skeptical, and highly engaged with the audience (“Community” and chat shout-outs).
- There is a pronounced “us” vs. “them” framing: ordinary people are pitted against a rigged system protecting wealthy, famous perpetrators.
- Listeners are constantly involved and their comments amplify the episode’s themes of disbelief and frustration with the justice system.
- The episode weaves news coverage, legal documents, community insight, and spontaneous reactions for an immersive and communal “truth-seeking” atmosphere.
Summary
Flo’s episode powerfully illustrates the frustration and doubt that many feel regarding high-profile cases involving celebrity and political elites. Through the lens of both the Diddy trial and the Epstein case, Flo questions the selective application of justice, the absence of key testimonies, and the integrity of press and prosecutorial procedures. Community input and real-time reactions reinforce the sense that the system is both opaque and unfairly tilted in favor of the powerful, leaving victims and ordinary people to fight an uphill battle for accountability.
