Podcast Summary: "B-2 Bomber Strikes on Iran Were Planned for Years?!"

Podcast Information:

• Title: The Glenn Beck Program
• Host/Author: Blaze Podcast Network
• Episode: B-2 Bomber Strikes on Iran Were Planned for Years?!
• Guest: Gabriel Narona
• Release Date: June 23, 2025

1. Introduction

The episode, hosted by Glenn Beck and featuring guests Stu Burguiere and Jason Buttrell, delves into the recent military action involving B-2 bomber strikes on Iran. The discussion provides a comprehensive analysis of the operation's background, execution, and potential future implications.

2. Historical Context of U.S.-Iran Relations

Stu Burguiere begins by outlining the longstanding tensions between the United States and Iran, tracing back to the 1979 Iranian hostage crisis and highlighting various attacks and conflicts over the decades. He emphasizes that the U.S. has been in a state of undeclared war with Iran since 1979, citing numerous incidents:

Stu Burguiere [05:03]: "We have been at war since 1979. It's just that nobody has ever called it that and nobody knew how to fight it."

He enumerates past actions, including bombings and assassinations, attributing them to Iranian support:

Stu Burguiere [04:59]: "The 1983 embassy bombing in Beirut... All of these attacks were traced back to the Iranian regime with Iranian support."

3. Operation Midnight Hammer: Execution and Strategy

The conversation shifts to the recent military operation dubbed Operation Midnight Hammer, which involved a significant deployment of B-2 heavy bombers and Tomahawk cruise missiles targeting Iran's nuclear facilities.

• Operation Details:
  • Aircraft Involved: Approximately 125 to 175 U.S. aircraft, including multiple B-2 bombers.
  • Bombing Strategy: Utilized subterfuge and misdirection by sending some bombers west towards Guam to divert attention while the majority targeted eastern targets.
  • Weaponry: Deployment of sophisticated bunker-buster bombs designed specifically for this mission, trained for over 15 years.

Stu Burguiere [07:00]: "These bombs are so sophisticated... it can hit the top of a soda can from 50,000ft."

• Operational Success: Preliminary satellite imagery suggests significant destruction of targeted sites, though ground verification is pending.

Stu Burguiere [08:22]: "If we're going to do this accurately, let me lay out all of the cards on the table... These are not nameless nobodies. They are trained. They are embedded."

4. Immediate Implications and Future Consequences

Stu and Jason discuss the potential immediate fallout from the strike, including possible Iranian retaliation and broader geopolitical ramifications.

• Potential Iranian Responses:
  • Targeting U.S. Forces: Risk of Iran retaliating against U.S. military personnel in the Middle East.
  • Straits of Hormuz Closure: Iran's parliament has voted to consider closing this critical oil transit route, which could spike global oil prices dramatically.

Stu Burguiere [12:55]: "If Iran chooses to do this, we will see a spike in our oil prices somewhere between $120 and $150 a barrel."

• Global Economic Impact: A sustained increase in oil prices could destabilize the global economy, potentially leading to economic collapse.

• Alliances and International Relations:

  • China and Russia: Concerns about these nations' potential support for Iran, though current statements suggest limited military involvement.

5. Interview with Gabriel Narona

Guest: Gabriel Narona, Polaris National Security President and Former State Department Special Advisor for Iran.

Key Discussion Points:

• Constitutional Authority: Narona affirms that the President did not require congressional permission for the strike, citing the Constitution's provisions for the Commander-in-Chief.

  Gabriel Narona [49:37]: "The Constitution grants him the powers as commander in chief to take all necessary actions, especially in a limited fashion, like he just did."

• War Powers Resolution: Narona discusses the War Powers Resolution of 1973, its limitations, and its non-enforcement by past administrations.

  Gabriel Narona [53:49]: "The Supreme Court has never ruled that resolution constitutional. And every single president since 1973, Democrat and Republican, have all asserted that is an unconstitutional resolution that was passed into law."

• Iran's Intentions: He highlights Iran's hostile rhetoric and secretive nuclear ambitions as legitimate threats necessitating decisive action.

• Potential for Regime Change: Narona expresses cautious optimism that the strike could pave the way for internal collapse of the Iranian regime, similar to historical precedents like Poland.

  Gabriel Narona [65:26]: "There's a large number of Iranians who all they really want is a secular government that lives at peace with its neighbors..."

6. Public Reaction and Media Narratives

The hosts discuss the polarized public and media reactions to the strikes, noting attempts by the mainstream media to frame the actions as acts of aggression or Islamophobia. They critique the lack of bipartisan support and the media's focus on divisive narratives rather than factual analysis.

7. Broader Geopolitical Implications

• Middle East Stability: Concerns about prolonged military engagements and the potential for escalating conflicts in the region.
• Global Economic Stability: The importance of the Straits of Hormuz for global oil supply and the catastrophic effects of its closure.
• International Alliances: The role of China and Russia in either exacerbating or mitigating the situation based on their strategic interests.

8. Conclusion and Future Outlook

The episode concludes with reflections on the uncertain future following the strikes. The hosts emphasize the need for vigilance, preparedness, and unity in the face of potential retaliation and global instability.

Stu Burguiere [37:17]: "We cannot have another prolonged military fiasco in the Middle East. We cannot have American boots on the ground."

They call for strategic investments in national defense and economic resilience, urging listeners to stay informed and prepared for various scenarios.

Notable Quotes:

1. Stu Burguiere [05:03]: "We have been at war since 1979. It's just that nobody has ever called it that and nobody knew how to fight it."
2. Gabriel Narona [49:37]: "The Constitution grants him the powers as commander in chief to take all necessary actions, especially in a limited fashion, like he just did."
3. Stu Burguiere [37:17]: "We cannot have another prolonged military fiasco in the Middle East. We cannot have American boots on the ground."

Key Takeaways:

• Planned Military Action: The B-2 bomber strikes on Iran were meticulously planned over 15 years, aiming to dismantle Iran's nuclear capabilities decisively.
• Constitutional Authority: The President acted within his constitutional powers as Commander-in-Chief, bypassing the need for immediate congressional approval.
• Potential Risks: Significant risks include Iranian retaliation, disruption of global oil supply, and involucration of major powers like China and Russia.
• Hope for Regime Change: There is cautious optimism that the strikes could lead to the internal collapse of the Iranian regime, though uncertainty remains.
• Media and Public Polarization: The mainstream media's narrative tends to overshadow factual analysis, leading to public polarization and misunderstanding of the situation.

Disclaimer: This summary aims to provide an objective overview of the podcast episode based on the provided transcript. It does not endorse or promote any viewpoints expressed by the hosts or guests.