Transcript
Glenn Beck (0:00)
Your data is like gold to hackers. They'll sell it to the highest bidder. Are you protected? McAfee helps shield you blocking suspicious texts, malicious emails and fraudulent websites. McAfee Secure VPN lets you browse safely and its AI powered tech scam detector spots threats instantly. You'll also get up to $2 million of award winning antivirus and identity theft protection all for just $39.99 for your first year. Visit mcafee.com/incancel anytime terms apply.
Stu Burguiere (0:30)
Why the heck is Chief Justice Roberts issuing but not issuing a public statement against Donald Trump's constitutional actions with usaid? I about blow a gasket on that one. The JFK files also starting to be released. Did we get any smoking guns or anything? We break down some of the information that has come to light and after 16 years, Stu and I get to take a victory lap on something that everybody mocked relentlessly. But I'm the bigger person and I'm also right. And you'll hear about that and so much more on today's podcast. Today is the day that you can make an important decision. Do you keep your current cell phone plan? You know, the one where you shell out big money every month to a big mobile corporation donating that money to leftist causes, or do you switch to Patriot Mobile which charges way less and shares your values? I don't know. Choice seems pretty simple to me because I see Patriot Mobile, they've got an action them not related to Patriot Mobile that Patriot Mobile donates to to be able to help us elect the right people in school boards and, and even, you know, all statewide elections. They're not involved in any federal election, I'll tell you that right now. Patriotmobile.com Beck you can go there now, please. This is the lowest. You're going to save money. You're going to get the same great service. This is the lowest rung of the ladder. If you want to help. Patriot mobile.com Beck patriot mobile.com Beck switch your service. Get a free month of service. 972 patriot 972 patriot patriotmobile.com Beck you're listening to the best of the Glenn Beck program. Chief Justice John Roberts, the supposed guardian of judicial restraint, has once again stepped into the spotlight not with a gavel, but with a press release. Now remember, these are the justices that go to the State of the Union. And you could say George Washington, he was the best. And, and America, it's the best. It's done some things wrong, but it's really, really super great. And they're not allowed to applaud, they're not allowed to show any kind of deference one way or another. They sit there with their hands folded. Why? So you don't show any kind of support one way or another. You are a neutral party. Okay, so he issues a press release. Strangely, not through the Supreme Court, not through the usual channels. Why? We'll get into that later. So it's a really rare move for a Chief justice to do this. And he rebukes the president, President Trump, for suggesting that judges who overstep their bounds might face impeachment. Okay, well, first of all, Trump, not known for his subtlety, him saying things like this, not really novel. Really? And this opinion, isn't that novel? The Constitution vests Congress with the power to check the judiciary just as it checks the executive. It's a blunt tool. I mean, it's impeachment, but it is in Article 3. It's not a blank check for black robe philosopher kings. Okay? And it has been done in the past. It's a very high bar, as it should be. Just like impeachment for the President. How dare you say he should be impeached. Why? Why is it wrong for them to say you want to impeach the President? Is it wrong for people to call for impeachment? Because that's in the Constitution. You may not like it, you may think that that's not the standard, but it is not something that you come out and go, oh my gosh, how dare you? You're saying, oh, I gotta clutch my pearls. I'm not even wearing pearls. I wish I was transgender right now, cuz I'd be having my strand of PE and I can clutch. No, that's in the Constitution. Yet Roberts, in his indignation, clutching his pearls, crying out, this is a threat to judicial independence. Okay, okay, all right, okay, hang on. Now. It's not wrong to defend the appellate review process. Usually these things come out when you're giving a talk to, you know, law students or something. You'll say, you know, I, that's not the way it works, et cetera, et cetera. But no, no, no, no, no, no. This was an official statement. And he's spoken about this even eloquently at times about the proper, you know, the proper channels to correct judicial error 2018. He remind us we don't have Obama judges or Trump judges or Bush judges or Clinton judges. We just have a judge. Well, yeah, okay, I wish that were true, but it's not. C. D.C. district judges, but he's come out and said that, and that would be the right thing. I wish we didn't have those. The system is designed so higher courts can sift through the lower ones, not for pitches, for pitchforks and gavels to fly. Now, Trump is not, you know, parsing Mayberry versus Madison. That's not what he was doing, okay? He's not like, you know, I'd like to make an intellectual case on this. He's like, I think this is impeachable. So here's the President saying this, and the, the judicial branch trying to muzzle him doesn't. I mean, I don't care. But free speech, it's not bent away from the. The commander in chief, is it? I mean, can the commander in chief, can, can the President have his point of view? Just like can John Roberts have his point of view? John Roberts should have his own point of view based solely on the Constitution, and he should have the restraint to look impartial every step of the way. I wonder, can he be trusted to try anything, anything to review anything on Donald Trump and let me make this case. Trump thinks that Justice, Justices that are overreaching by inventing rights or rewriting statues from the statutes, from the bench. He thinks that that is impeachable, okay? He has every right to say so. You know, the, the framers didn't build a system where only judges can chime in on things. But Roberts seems to think that Trump's words carry some, I don't know, hypnotic power that's going to frame America's view of the judiciary as a pinata for political whacking. Only Donald Trump can do that. But he doesn't even own his own statement. A formal, deliberate, not some offhanded quip framing Trump in this light as a, I don't know, a hypnotist. I don't know. Isn't there something to be seen here from the Chief Justice? I mean, he's not just scolding. He is signaling. I'm the arbiter of propriety. I'm the one that will tell what's right and what's wrong. That is a power play dressed as principle. How do I know that? Let me ask you this. Where was his righteous pin? When did he say, someone get me a quill? When Biden railed against the Supreme Court as out of control or a extremist court, that maybe we should add two or three more justices until we get it right? Where was get me my quill? I must clutch my pearls and write a missive out right now. Where was that? He didn't say anything about that. He didn't say anything about that. And that one's a pretty well established idea. We don't do that. But if you want to just look at them at face value, I think one is stronger than the other. But if you want to just take it as even Trump said this, and it is, it's. Even though it's in the Constitution. How dare you. And the other that Biden did is not in the Constitution, but you could read it any way you want if you'd like. And only one of them gets in trouble from the Supreme Court. Well, I mean, I don't understand. Hmm. No statements, not a lecture, nothing. Apparently, the threat only comes from Donald Trump. Now, let me remind you, this is a guy who twisted him. I mean, the guy, the guy was a pretzel with, with Obamacare. He was so twisted inside and out. He, he changed Obamacare. He rewrote Obamacare out of a tax or. No, into a tax. Right. Was it in tax or out of it? I can't remember one way or another. He said exact opposite of what the bill actually said. Remember with Obamacare, he's like it. What he should have said was, this isn't written correctly. I'm sending it back to Congress. If they want it to be a tax, they can write it that way. No, he didn't do that. He just said, yeah, I'm going to rewrite it. That's not his job. I mean, he's a gymnast. He bent over backwards in 2015 saying, Established by the state could mean federal government because, well, intent matters more than text. Now. The text is pretty important, really. Kind of important, because if you get too far away from the people that actually said something, you know, and did something, and you don't really know what their intent is. I don't know. I've read, I've read a lot of history books, and then I've wrote, I've read a lot of journals of those people that the history books were written about. They don't say the same thing. This is a. What he was doing. Amending the Constitution from the bench is the biggest betrayal, Constitutional betrayal of the first order. The Constitution, John, is not a suggestion. It's a contract. Roberts of, of all people should know that. So here we are, Chief justice who wields his platform selectively chastising a president for speaking his mind while the other presidents speaking their mind, saying things like, this is an extremist court. This is why we, we just, we. We have to Start all over again with the Supreme. That's why you don't say anything about that guy. Hmm. Hmm. Trump's call for the impeachment in the Constitution may be misguided. I don't know, I kind of agree with it myself. But when you look at the history of impeaching judges, it's. The bar is super, super high. Okay? And it should be just like the bar to impeach the president. It should be super, super high. I think that this is impeachable, but I don't think you're going to make that case. The real question is, is why does John Robert think his voice should drown out the rest? Why does he think he is the one that should be heard on this? I mean, if you're worried about framing, oh, this guy is. This guy's framing this, you know, all wrong and people are going to follow him. What the hell are you doing? Maybe you should look in the mirror here, John. Maybe it's just me, but somehow I don't think it is. Here's what's coming. We knew this because, what was it, a month ago? And do I have this in my show prep? I know I have it someplace today. You know, when you're looking at. When you're looking at what's coming. We told you this because they told us this months ago that what they were going to do was activate all of these activist judges. They were going to file suits, they were going to do everything they could. Instead of stopping him in the streets, which didn't work, they. They're going to start trying to stop him in the court system. Well, that. Honestly, guys, you didn't really learn your lesson. He's not stopped by the court system. I don't know, you tried that before, but go ahead, you're going to try it again. That's all that's happening. This isn't about the truth. This is about a group of desperate people who know they're being exposed right now. Why do you think they're so freaked out? Because they're being exposed. It's over. It's over. You're not getting the cash from the people anymore. You're not just gonna milk the system until all of us are just outta milk. No, it's over. The game is over. And so what do they have to do? They have to do whatever they can. Well, they can't put people on the streets because that didn't work out for them. So now, and they told us this, just go, just go after Donald Trump in every possible way. In the court. Just get him tied up in the court. Well, that sure tells you how much they love America, doesn't it? Especially when you have somebody like Schumer saying, you know, just a few years ago, look, we all know there's waste. We all know there's fraud in the government and it has to be, it has to be stopped. Well, wait then, so we're stopping it and now you're not for that? Hmm? What else is going on? And why is it that John Roberts is only speaking out against Trump and didn't say boo under Biden? Is it possible that he wanted to, but he was afraid because the left were the ones that sent people to the justice's house to kill the justices and he knows the people on the right aren't that we're not that kind of people. We don't do that. We don't believe in that. They do. So John, are you just a hypocrite that doesn't understand the Constitution or are you a coward? Because those are the only two that I see as real possibilities. This is the best of the Glenn Beck program and we really want to thank you for listening. I want to talk to you a little bit about good ranchers. Good ranchers. You know, you're doing the raw milk thing. Do good ranchers. The this is the best American meat from ranchers that, you know, raise this grass fed. I mean, it's really good beef. Also good chicken, really good moist, moist chicken and applewood bacon. Can't tell you anything about that other than it's yummy and wild caught salmon. Right now they're running a presidential special where for the next four years while, you know, hopefully we are celebrating a Trump victory, you'll get either the chicken or the bacon or the Angus ground beef or whatever, whatever it is that you decide, you'll get up to $1,200 in savings. They're just going to pack that in to every month's order. All you have to do is sign up. Get your meat from America. Good ranchers.com use the promo code Glenn. Claim this personal presidential special worth up to twelve hundred dollars. Bring one hundred percent American meat to your family. Good ranchers.com promo code Glenn before we get into JFK, let me give you an update. Last week, last Wednesday, a week ago on my TV special, we showed you exclusive leaked documents from behind NASA's Artemis moon mission. It was a 99 page playbook thanks to brave whistleblowers that gave it to us. We exposed it last week. If you saw this special you learned that we, we spent $100 billion of taxpayer money obsessing over how to make the next mission to Mars, you know, into a massive DEI propaganda operation complete with the heroes and the villains and you know, partnerships with Hollywood and Coca Cola and Nike even. I'm not kidding. Go back onto glenn beck.com and look this up. Even a theme park. It sounds funny and absurd but prioritizing woke crap over science and human safety. It could be a little dangerous. I don't know you. So all of the best scientists, all of the best astronauts were, were not the priority. You had to be a female and black, you know, or Dylan Mulvaney I guess. And if you wanted to be a trans or not, you could go up in, in space. I guess it was nuts. Well, we thought it was really odd that since President Trump took office and eliminated quote, radical and wasteful government DEI programs on day one, this program had not been abolished. And the NASA website describing the DEI driven Artemis mission was still active when whistleblowers reached out to us prior to Blaze News and our TV investigation the reps the website NASA read with NASA's Artemis campaign. We are exploring the moon for scientific discovery, technology advancement and to learn how to live and work on another world. As we prepare for human missions to Mars, we will collaborate with commercial and international partners and establish the first long term presence on the moon. NASA will land the first woman, first person of color and first international partner astronaut on the moon using innovative technologies to explore more of the lunar surface than ever before. So my executive producer of the TV show Ricky reached out to the Office of Management and Budget run by Russ Vote and said hey, I don't know if you saw this special. Are you aware of what's going on and why is this still on the NASA website? Is NASA still doing this? Are they resisting the Trump dictate? Well, we sent them an email on Thursday. That was the day after we broke the story and hmm, immediately after it was gone. Here's what was leaked to us. Under the Biden administration, NASA updated its mission vowing to land a first woman and first person of color on the moon. 2021 internal presentation slide deck obtained exclusively by Blaze News and Glenn TV revealed NASA's exhaustive marketing plans for Artemis, a DEI driven mission. The presentation explained NASA's plan to establish the Artemis brand. It stated that the mission must inspire several audience segments, future supporters, the public, collaborators and advocates. The list included bipoc and individuals noting that Artemis should build mass appeal with and get to participate Especially underserved and underrepresented groups. Well, it appeared that some staff at NASA were still going down this road. As of 1:30. The very next day or the day we sent it, it was still on the website. Within an hour we got a response. We're looking into this. I'm sorry we didn't know about it. Next day the OMB told us the Artemis section on the NASA website had been doged. And this happened because of brave whistleblowers and you. NASA's Artemis campaign. We're exploring the moon now. This is what it reads for scientific discovery, technology and advancement and to learn how to live and work on another world. As we prepare for human missions on Mars, we will collaborate with commercial and international partners and establish the first long term presence on the moon. All that first, you know, woman, person of color, you know, we're going to, you know what, we're going to have people from the Congo in a spacesuit as well. Why, why all of that is gone. We can't do these investigations without you, without your support. Thank you. Thank you for everything that you do. Thank you for getting the news of this out last week. Join our moonshot mission to be the media company that actually makes a difference@blaze tv.com Glenn that's BlazeTV.com Glenn Tonight. I'm doing another special tonight. It's about NATO and Ukraine. Why are we members of NATO? Should we be neighbors? How did this happen? What is, what was NATO for? How did we get it so deeply involved with one of one, if not the most corrupt countries in the world? When did that happen? And why in 2008 did we all of a sudden start to become really cozy friends? Why? Join me for all of the background tonight on Ukraine, Putin and my answer to the question, should Trump withdraw from NATO? That's tonight at 9pm Eastern on Blaze TV, tomorrow at 6pm and that's on YouTube.com/glenn beck. I got a busy day today because I'm going out to shooting range because we have the only gun that we know of that is an exact copy of the gun Oswald used to kill President Kennedy. Because it's a real weird hodgepodge of guns. It was the one that killed Kennedy has a different scope on it, very rare, very hard to find. I think it's might even be a Russian scope. I can't remember. The scope is from someplace. There's, there's parts of this gun. They're from someplace else. And so, you know, we wanted to get. Because we don't have the Real gun. We wanted to get one just like it took us two years to assemble this gun and to find all of the parts so it's an exact copy of it. I'm going out to a shooting range today and we're gonna do our first test. Just, I've got some sharpshooters with me and we'll, we'll, we'll post some of this on X as we do it live today, but then you'll be able to see all of it because we're going to another shooting range hopefully next week to get moving targets to see if, if they can make these shots. But it should be interesting today. You watch for it on X and then that'll be next week as we go through everything that has been released on the JFK files, because it's going to take us a while. Anybody who says, oh, they don't have any idea, 80,000 documents are being released. So, you know, there, well, Jason is here, he's our chief researcher for the TV show 80,000 documents. How long would that have taken us to go through for staff? What do we have eight people on it right now? How long without GROK or AI assist, how long would that take us?