Best of the Program | Guest: Carol Roth & | 1/23/25

Summary

Summary of "The Glenn Beck Program" Episode Featuring Carol Roth | January 23, 2025

Hosted by Blaze Podcast Network, "The Glenn Beck Program" offers insightful and compelling perspectives on American culture and politics. In this episode titled "Best of the Program," Glenn Beck engages in a robust discussion with guest Carol Roth, delving into pressing issues such as President Trump's policies on drug cartels, economic implications, corporate regulations, China's economic stability, and the burgeoning field of artificial intelligence.

---

1. President Trump's Strategy Against Drug Cartels

Glenn Beck initiates the conversation by addressing President Trump's decision to release the JFK assassination files and transitions into the administration's aggressive stance against Mexican drug cartels. He highlights concerns raised by The New York Times regarding the economic repercussions of dismantling these cartels.

Glenn Beck (00:00): "New York Times worried about all of the right things... the president spoke at the World Economic Forum and Carol Roth is here to talk about the economy."

Stu Burguiere reacts with skepticism, questioning the positive impacts suggested by The New York Times.

Stu Burguiere (03:12): "Oh, no."

The discussion reveals that while cartels are responsible for significant violence and economic destabilization, The New York Times voices apprehensions about potential economic fallout from aggressive crackdowns.

Glenn Beck (03:26): "Now I'm trying to think about the positive impact the New York Times might have found with the cartels. I mean, job creators."

Stu Burguiere (03:35): "I mean, the medical... pharmaceutical companies."

The conversation underscores the complexity of targeting cartels, balancing security concerns with economic consequences.

---

2. The Corporate Transparency Act and Government Overreach

Carol Roth joins the discussion to shed light on the impending Corporate Transparency Act, which mandates small businesses to register with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). She elaborates on the detrimental effects this regulation poses to small enterprises.

Carol Roth (19:23): "This is a rule that is basically coming from the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network Division of Treasury authorized by Congress... we really want to prevent money laundering, cartels. So we're going after you small businesses."

Glenn Beck expresses frustration over the lack of awareness and the stringent penalties associated with non-compliance.

Glenn Beck (20:10): "When was this supposed to go in effect? Because I haven't filed anything, nor am I going to."

Roth provides a detailed update on the legal battles surrounding the Act, emphasizing the need for legislative repeal.

Carol Roth (20:24): "We have the courts, we have the Trump administration that could jettison it... We need everybody to call their representatives."

This segment highlights the ongoing tension between regulatory bodies and small businesses, advocating for congressional intervention to repeal oppressive laws.

---

3. Economic Stability and China's Financial Health

The conversation shifts to China's economic situation, with Glenn Beck questioning recent market instability and its implications for the global economy.

Glenn Beck (23:47): "China is... their banks were collapsing... Bear Stearns, that this was the beginning..."

Carol Roth presents a contrarian view, suggesting that China's issues might have broader repercussions for the Western economy than initially perceived.

Carol Roth (24:26): "China may have more Runway than us actually says that this may be worse for us than China."

They discuss the unusual behavior of China's financial maneuvers, such as selling off gold, which traditionally signals economic distress.

Carol Roth (25:19): "They've been selling piling... they're taking it in."

The discourse explores whether current indicators suggest a more profound economic crisis emanating from China, potentially triggering a global debt spiral.

---

4. The Stargate AI Project and Its Implications

A significant portion of the episode is dedicated to the introduction and potential ramifications of the Stargate project, a massive AI infrastructure initiative spearheaded by major tech entities.

Glenn Beck warns of the dual-edged nature of artificial intelligence, predicting both monumental advancements and catastrophic risks.

Glenn Beck (29:05): "We are at a place right now that could be remembered as the catastrophic moment for humanity... Stargate is going to build massive infrastructure... This is the last generation right now."

He underscores the urgency of addressing AI's potential threats, such as autonomous infrastructure development without human oversight.

Glenn Beck (29:05): "If they tell AI to survive... it will find the power and build electricity generation plants itself and drain our electricity..."

Stargate's involvement with influential figures and organizations raises concerns about surveillance and individual liberties.

Glenn Beck (29:05): "Larry Ellison... predicting that AI will soon create the world's most sophisticated surveillance system... you have to be on the other side of this."

Carol Roth adds to the discourse by highlighting the financial backing and international collaborations fueling the AI boom.

Carol Roth (22:16): "MGX is also a player in what I think is another hundred billion dollar AI infrastructure effort... Microsoft, not good... BlackRock... UAE."

The discussion culminates in a cautionary stance against unchecked AI development, emphasizing the need for vigilance and proactive measures to safeguard human autonomy.

---

5. Final Thoughts and Future Outlook

In concluding remarks, Glenn Beck reflects on the precarious balance between technological advancements and societal well-being. He emphasizes the critical juncture humanity faces with the advent of advanced AI and its potential to either revolutionize or destabilize human civilization.

Glenn Beck (29:05): "We are at an inflection point with technology and we as humans are in tremendous danger... This era is over."

Beck urges listeners to remain informed and engaged in the discourse surrounding AI to navigate the impending challenges effectively.

---

Notable Quotes:

• Glenn Beck (00:00): "The sad and ugly truth is that no one, not even President Trump and his incoming administration, can protect you and your family from every possible emergency situation that could arise."

• Carol Roth (17:19): "We're sick of NGOs sticking our nose in their business... best case scenario for me."

• Glenn Beck (29:05): "We are at a place right now that could be remembered as the catastrophic moment for humanity... or the greatest thing that has happened to mankind since we learned to harness electricity."

---

Conclusion

This episode of "The Glenn Beck Program" underscores critical national and global issues, from the aggressive policies against drug cartels and their economic implications to the looming challenges posed by artificial intelligence. Through incisive dialogue with Carol Roth, Glenn Beck elucidates the intricate interplay between government regulations, economic stability, and technological advancements, urging listeners to remain vigilant and proactive in navigating these complex landscapes.

For those seeking a deeper understanding of these topics, "The Glenn Beck Program" offers a comprehensive and thought-provoking exploration of the forces shaping our present and future.

Transcript

[Glenn Beck]

New York Times worried about all of the right things. You know, like, what would the impact be if Trump takes out all of the cartels that could hurt our economy? What? Also Stargate could end up being a catastrophe or one of the greatest inventions since mankind harnessed energy and electricity. Which one, if not both? What does it mean? Also, the president spoke at the World Economic Forum and Carol Roth is here to talk about the economy. All on today's podcast. Let me talk you first about my Patriot Supply. The sad and ugly truth is that no one, not even President Trump and his incoming administration, can protect you and your family from every possible emergency situation that could arise. We have to prepare for them the best that we can. And when a crisis hits, food is almost always the first casualty. Everybody needs it. And soon as things get scary, panic buying sets in and you don't want to be a part of that. Storing emergency food in your home is the right thing to do. We still live in crazy times and your family might need it. Right now, my Patriot Supply offering off their four week emergency food kit. Go to my Patriotsupply.com right now and grab yours. Don't put this off. Now is the time to Prepare. It's my Patriotsupply.com. get your four week food kit right now. My Patriotsupply.com you're listening to the best of the Glenn Beck Program. Welcome to the Glenn Beck Program. Well, Trump has decided to release the JFK assassination files immediately. They're coming out sometime next week. We'll see what has been held back. In talking to Cash Patel, he said that he saw them and it's not who they're protecting, but what they're protecting. He wouldn't give us any more details other than that he is one of the guys who saw it with President Trump. When President Trump decided to hold back one more time, we'll see if these come out. I'm still waiting also for an explanation of the drones, but that's kind of fallen off the news. And you know, he has been a little busy. A little busy with a couple of other things. The New York Times also busy? Yeah, I mean, I've heard some crazy things. Stu, I just want to give you this and tell me how you get here. New York Times. Mexican drug cartels are responsible for the untimely deaths of hundreds of thousands of people over the past two decades. When factoring in the fentanyl they smuggle into the United States, cartels are also culpable for the Deaths of over 200Americans every day. They deal with Murder and addiction, mass kidnappings, rape, torture, political intimidation, yada, yada. But the New York Times has a concern about the economic impact of Trump's plan to identify and hold the cartels responsible.

[Stu Burguiere]

Oh, no.

[Glenn Beck]

Now I'm trying to think about the positive impact the New York Times might have found with the cartels. I mean, job creators.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yes.

[Glenn Beck]

Yeah.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yes, absolutely. Yeah, you got that. You got.

[Glenn Beck]

They're kind of, kind of in the medical business. Kind of.

[Stu Burguiere]

I mean, the medical.

[Glenn Beck]

Okay, well, they're kind of pharmaceutical companies.

[Stu Burguiere]

Okay, sure. I mean, you could treat certain ailments.

[Glenn Beck]

With their, their products. They're into the entertainment business.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yes.

[Glenn Beck]

Adult entertainment or child entertainment, you know.

[Stu Burguiere]

For adults, how you want to be entertained.

[Glenn Beck]

Sure, sure.

[Stu Burguiere]

I mean, would we get any good movies or music if there were no drugs in this country? Probably not. You know, that's going to be. That's. That Hollywood change is in trouble.

[Glenn Beck]

Change. Yeah.

[Stu Burguiere]

Are they trying to say basically these cartels are, you know, used as coyotes? Essentially, and the people who are coming in for free, cheap labor or free or cheap labor won't be coming in anymore that hurts our economy? I mean, again, I don't think that's a good argument, but is that what they're trying to get to?

[Glenn Beck]

So what they're saying is, is that this is going to be hard on the banks. Going to be hard on the banks because why would the cartel, why would.

[Stu Burguiere]

Cartels going away be hard on banks?

[Glenn Beck]

Because the banks are going to be responsible for knowing if you're, you know, if your client is a, you know, part of a drug cartel.

[Stu Burguiere]

And, you know, okay, so what additional, I mean, is this going to cause additional layers of paperwork for everybody, essentially?

[Glenn Beck]

I don't know. I guess.

[Stu Burguiere]

And not just cartels, but like, you know, are you in friendly neighborhood drug dealers?

[Glenn Beck]

You know, I, I think, I mean, if you're in that business, you probably aren't using a bank. You know what I mean? Now, if you're a cartel, you want to use the banks. But I mean, if you're coming in, you know, every year with, you know, $1.5 billion or, you know, even have holdings of a trillion dollars, you know, I might want to ask, how are you doing that? I'm in the import export business. I'd like a little bit more, like a little bit more. You know, you also put down here you're in the entertainment industry and pharmaceuticals, but I haven't seen anything on the shelves from you.

[Stu Burguiere]

Now, Elizabeth Warren has reliably told me that criminals only use cryptocurrency so maybe that. Why would they need the banks? Why would it affect the banks in any way?

[Glenn Beck]

I don't know. I don't know know. But, you know, I just, you know, as I said yesterday, if I were an entrepreneur and I were in Mexico, I might start coffins.com, you know, because I think there's going to be a run on coffins. And, you know, as long as Gavin Newsom isn't there, he's not going to put any. Well, there's a coffin shortage. So, you know, let's not raise the price of coffins. He's not going to do that. You can, you can. Price on demand, I'm guessing.

[Stu Burguiere]

Wow.

[Glenn Beck]

In Mexico. So when there's a rush for coffins because I don't know, our special forces have killed all of the people in the drug cartels. You could make some money.

[Stu Burguiere]

What's your impression on what Trump actually does here? We talked a little bit about this yesterday, but, like, what's the, what's the specific plan? I know you don't, you know, I mean, you're not going to reveal anything, but, like, because I don't. You. I give thoughts and impressions, let's say. So.

[Glenn Beck]

Thoughts and impressions.

[Stu Burguiere]

When you talk, when basing this completely on your thoughts and impressions.

[Glenn Beck]

Yes. And not anything else, what would Trump.

[Stu Burguiere]

What would be the approach here to take out the cartels in Mexico?

[Glenn Beck]

He would assign people to make a list of who those, those terrorists are.

[Stu Burguiere]

Will they be checking it twice?

[Glenn Beck]

They'll check it twice.

[Stu Burguiere]

Okay. Will they find out who's naughty or nice?

[Glenn Beck]

Yeah, that's what they're looking for right now. And then, then they'll give it to the president and they'll say, here's the case against these guys and this cartel and many other cartels. And the president will say, what do you recommend? And they'll say, we go in at night with our, you know, night vision and we kill them all. And he says, okay. And so then we go in at night and we kill them all. And in the morning, everybody wakes up surprised because they're dead.

[Stu Burguiere]

I was going to say, do they.

[Glenn Beck]

Wake up coffins dot com.

[Stu Burguiere]

Okay. And just leaves like a, like a rotating. Just a repeating ad on the television for coffins dot com.

[Glenn Beck]

Are you a member of the cartel? You might be. You might consider becoming a franchisee owner of Golfins.com. yeah, I think that's what he's gonna do. He's not going to, he's not going to play around. You are going to see death and destruction of these cartels. And, you know, I don't, I don't. I'd be shocked to find out if that was our special forces doing that. Gosh darn it.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, that would be a shocking, shocking thing. So that's. It's an under. Essentially an undercover plan where you're sending in undercover.

[Glenn Beck]

I'm not sure how he's going to do it, if it's going to be undercover or if it will be on. You know, it might be like Survivor, except it's a real kind of situation. Do you, this week on Survivor, who's going to survive in this cartel?

[Stu Burguiere]

Do you have the. Maybe. Do you have some sort of arrangement with the Mexican government on this? Like, do you say to them, look, we're coming in, like it or not?

[Glenn Beck]

He already did.

[Stu Burguiere]

Well, he said that, but, I mean, there's a certain level of, of Donald Trump saying things in a negotiation.

[Glenn Beck]

I don't think they're, you know, like yesterday, yesterday at the wef, they asked the president of Pat. Panama, you know, are you worried about the president just taking the Panama Canal? And he said, get serious. Yeah, get serious. Please get serious. I don't know. I think Donald Trump might be serious about that one. Not about Greenland. He's never said he's going to just go take Greenland or Mexico or Canada, even though the Canada one would be easy. He's. He's not going to. He's not doing that. But he is very clear. I am going to kill the cartels because they're terrorist operations and they're operating here in the United States and causing a lot of pain and suffering. And so I'm going to kill them all.

[Stu Burguiere]

I mean, he's designated them terrorist groups. Right? We know what has happened with, you know, al Qaeda or whatever when you, when he designated a terrorist group, it gives us what we consider, and other countries don't consider the legal authority to go in and do these types of.

[Glenn Beck]

Things because Mexico no longer has the legal authority to do anything because they're run by the cartels. So you're gonna see a lot of feigned outrage at the beginning until he gets rid of these cartels, and then they're gonna go, thank you.

[Stu Burguiere]

Well, that's what. And that's what I wonder, because we've had this relationship with certain other countries where we've gone to them and said, hey, we're doing this whether you like it or not. And they, some of them are angry and outraged, but a lot of them are like, oh, no, you shouldn't. Okay, just if you need to know where they are, let me know.

[Glenn Beck]

Right.

[Stu Burguiere]

Like they want. They would love to get rid of this problem, I think. And it's depending on who you're talking about. In the Mexican government, you like to get rid of this because they're challenging your power.

[Glenn Beck]

People will be very happy if it happens. People in Mexico will be very, very happy.

[Stu Burguiere]

Right.

[Glenn Beck]

And so it's not gonna be real unpopular in Mexico with the average everyday people.

[Stu Burguiere]

But what would be unpopular? Right. Like, let's just say we had a problem with, you know, I don't know, cartels in our country. And the Mexican government was upset with the reverse situation happening. They're crossing the border, they're doing all these terrible things. They sent in their special forces into our country without approval. We would. We're a sovereign nation, right? We would be upset about that.

[Glenn Beck]

We would be upset.

[Stu Burguiere]

We're the big boys on the, on the, on, on the street, so we don't have to care necessarily about that.

[Glenn Beck]

But let's, let's actually flip that. Okay. Let's say we were in the situation that Mexico's in where we try to vote mayors in, we try to vote. Vote governors in, and they're just slaughtered in the streets because they say, I'm taking on the cartels and they slaughter everyone in. In government that is even whispering about that.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Glenn Beck]

So we've tried to vote them out. And we as people know that our government is now in bed with the cartels, and it's getting worse and worse and worse. And Mexico says, you know what? Enough of these cartels, they are hurting our people. And so we're going to come across the border and we're going to take care of them. Because you won't. Would you really be upset? My gosh, they're violating our borders. I would be all for it quietly.

[Stu Burguiere]

Right. That's the part I think is interesting. I think if I were the President of the United States in this situation, and the president of Mexico says, we've got these great special forces, we're coming in and taking them out, whether you like it or not. I think that's what I would say. I would say, well, because I think as a country, you can't just give your nation to the other nation. Right. If we have the authority to cross the border, and they just are like, yeah, please, anytime you can come over and police in our country, please do so, then they're not a sovereign nation.

[Glenn Beck]

Yeah, we're not policing. Right.

[Stu Burguiere]

Well, kind of we are. I mean, it's a Very aggressive form of it.

[Glenn Beck]

This is an international terrorist group that is crossing our borders. And crossing.

[Stu Burguiere]

It's still a form of law enforcement. I mean, we are. But you would maybe say, well, we would never allow that. But you'd want it to occur.

[Glenn Beck]

Yes.

[Stu Burguiere]

And you'd encourage it and you'd assist in any way possible. I'm curious. Would do that.

[Glenn Beck]

You would take note of everyone in the federal government and your local government who opposed it. Who opposed it strongly and meant it. You would be like, okay, they're part of it.

[Stu Burguiere]

I got part of it. Right. And you'd probably be right.

[Glenn Beck]

Yeah.

[Stu Burguiere]

So I hope that's what Mexico does. I just don't know what this. Especially this new. This woman who's trying to get into, like, little fight, you know, peeing contests with Donald Trump over these types of things. I don't think that's a good approach.

[Glenn Beck]

No, this isn't a. This isn't a little peeing thing.

[Stu Burguiere]

But that's what she's doing. She's publicly coming out.

[Glenn Beck]

Oh, yeah.

[Stu Burguiere]

Well, if you're going to rename it Gulf of America, we're going to look at this region. This is actually ours, or whatever she's trying to.

[Glenn Beck]

We're going to stop sending you sombreros. Okay.

[Stu Burguiere]

Whatever. There was the sombrero threat. I don't know.

[Glenn Beck]

I don't know if that's really that.

[Stu Burguiere]

But, I mean, like, that was what she was doing. She was doing. Essentially. She was acting like a guest on the View. Yeah, right. Like, oh, yeah, well, I'm a strong woman and look at me.

[Glenn Beck]

I'm gonna rename your place.

[Stu Burguiere]

Stop it like that. Nonsense.

[Glenn Beck]

Right.

[Stu Burguiere]

If that's. If that's what she decides to be, that's. She probably won't do it this way. She probably complained about it and that. That's.

[Glenn Beck]

And if she is corrupt and in bed with the cartels, the people of Mexico will decide that after all of the pressure is off because we've killed the cartels.

[Stu Burguiere]

I hope that.

[Glenn Beck]

I just think there is. I mean, they're going to try to cause problems in here, but I have to tell you, you have no idea what you're up against with the United States military, our Special Forces. You have no idea. Oh, these are highly trained. Are they? No. No. I'm gonna put my money on the US Special Forces. That's what I'm gonna do. And I don't think they're gonna win in that fight.

[Stu Burguiere]

And let me ask you this related question. We've complained a lot about Dei in the military, that the military's gone soft, that we're, you know, we've had all these problems. Pete Hegseth wrote a book about it. He part of why he's going into this role. Are we too far gone? Is it possible that we don't have enough of what we need in the military to accomplish these tasks anymore?

[Glenn Beck]

For Mexico? No. For multiple fronts? Yes. For our special forces, our teams to go in in the dead of night and kill all these people? No. Mm. That's not beyond.

[Stu Burguiere]

We're still prepared for that.

[Glenn Beck]

Oh, yeah. Yeah.

[Stu Burguiere]

Good to hear.

[Glenn Beck]

Yeah. So the burner launcher was started and designed by the guy who designed it is a guy who was in. On the freeway and somebody had road rage and they were following him and, you know, trying to race him and everything else. And it was. He was really disturbed and he tried. He went over to the slow lane, slowed way down. The guy did the same thing. So he decided, I'm just going to pull over. The guy's not going to pull over. He'll just. Just passed me. Well, when he pulled over, so did the other guy. And the other guy just flew out of his car and it was. And he looks in his rearview mirror and he says, oh, my gosh, this guy's coming at me. He reached to his glove box and almost pulled out his gun. Decided not to. Decided to de. Escalate the situation. And he walked out and he was beaten on the side of the street within an inch of his life. And he said, I'm not going to shoot somebody for road rage. You know, I'm just not. He said, I would, but I would have pulled the gun if I had to do it over again, but I don't want to kill somebody for it. So he created the burner launcher, which would have stopped that from happening. Have one of these. And in. In honor of inauguration week, they put together a custom curated bundle, discounted 15% off. Right now. Get it right now. Byrna.com glenn b y r n a.com glenn now back to the podcast. This is the best of the Glenn Beck program. And don't forget, rate us on itunes. All right, can we pull up just real quickly? The President is addressing the World Economic Forum at Davos and even throughout the.

[Carol Roth]

World, food prices and the price of almost every other.

[Glenn Beck]

We're going to talk about that. We have a couple of producers watching this for us, are going to give us an update on this as we go, and we'll. We'll go back and go over his speech this should be, hopefully a very strong speech on America is America, and we're not playing your game anymore. But let's see, Carol Roth is joining us now. What do you expect the president to say in this, Carol?

[Carol Roth]

I mean, I've got a hope. I hope he says, you know, we're going to defund ourselves from you. We're not going to support you anymore. We're not going to give you money. And, you know, we're sick of NGOs sticking our nose in their business. Kind of like he did with the World Health Organization, which I was really excited about. Yeah. So I'll be listening for that, Glenn. I'm not sure if that'll happen this time around, but that would be best case scenario for me.

[Glenn Beck]

Yeah. Do you think he knows who the World Economic Economic Forum really is?

[Carol Roth]

I've got to imagine with the people who are in his circle, the same people who are advising him, you know, on who, DEI and esg, that I can't imagine how the World Economic Forum doesn't enter into that conversation with that group of people.

[Glenn Beck]

Right.

[Carol Roth]

So, you know, I would be surprised, but then again, many things have surprised me over and I'm not a betting woman.

[Glenn Beck]

So tell me what you see the president doing this week that you think signals really good things or bad things?

[Carol Roth]

Well, I think just the general tenor of having problem solvers in the White House and on his team instead of people who are intentionally trying to create problems. Huge. It's a huge, you know, what a concept to us. Right. Is that we're seeing every time he's coming out with one of these executive orders or putting something out there in an attempt to solve an actual real problem that is going to make America better instead of trying to create problems that is making America worse. And so that is a very refreshing change. Certainly there are many things to attack, and we all have our wish lists of how that comes down. And certainly some of these things come in partnership with Congress. So the number one thing, you know, on my agenda is to try to get this corporate transparency act repealed. So it'd be really great to hear him say that that's jettisoned. But I'm not sure if that's.

[Glenn Beck]

Well, that is being introduced by Rand Paul and somebody else in Congress. They're trying to get that to go through Congress, which is good. Right.

[Carol Roth]

Okay, so let me give you the update on that. So actually, so just to give people context, this is what Glenn and I have been talking about for almost a year. It's a rule that is basically coming from the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network Division of Treasury authorized by Congress. And unfortunately, that says that small business entities, so if you have an LLC or an S Corp or a C corporation, have to register with the Financial Crimes Division of Treasury. And oh, by the way, we're going to exempt big businesses and we're going to exempt financial services companies, but we really want to, we really want to prevent money laundering, cartels. So we're going after you small businesses. And the biggest challenge, not only is that government overreach, but the fines are egregious. You could face jail time or daily fines up to almost $600 a day. So this.

[Glenn Beck]

Hang on just a second. When, when was this supposed to go in effect? Because I haven't filed anything, nor am I going to.

[Carol Roth]

Okay, so there is an injunction in place. So originally the original deadline was 31st December.

[Glenn Beck]

Right.

[Carol Roth]

Then we got this. There are many lawsuits in place, but the one we're focused on is the one from the NFIB and CIR and some other folks. And that one got a nationwide injunction put in place saying that the treasury could not enforce this and they couldn't enforce penalties. Well, then that was overturned and then that was overturned again or stayed, as they call it. So right now where we stand is that the government has appealed the injunction, this nationwide injunction that says that you do not have to file. Right now, they've appealed just that piece to the Supreme Court. So if the Supreme Court does not overturn that injunction or stay the injunction, as they call it, then this goes to the courts at the end of March. So we have a few different paths here. We have the courts, we have the Trump administration that could jettison it. And then as you mentioned, we have Congress, we have some wonderful members of Congress who actually introduced repeal bills last year and have now reintroduced them. So in the House, that is Representative Warren Davidson of Ohio, and in the Senate, it is Tommy Tuberville. And we have gotten lots of co sponsors. So thank you. I heard this morning in the house we have 79 co sponsors. It's called the Repealing Big Brother Overreach Act. And then as you mentioned on the Senate side, you have really big names like Rand Paul who are now co sponsored. So this is getting momentum. We're getting more members of Congress to understand how devastating this is for small business. So it's the Repealing Big Brother Overreach act, perfectly named this time around. And what we need is we need everybody to call their representatives, call your senators and tell them if they're not already one of the co sponsors, they need to jump on because that is just the surest way of Congress is to repeal that. Then this is done. We don't have to worry about the Trump administration. We don't have to worry about anything else. And I will have to say I personally sent an email to Scott Besson and Treasury.

[Glenn Beck]

I don't know what, where does he stand on that?

[Carol Roth]

So it's interesting. So I don't, I've only met him, I think once or twice in the media, so I don't really know him personally, but I sent a message there anyway. He is a big Main street supposed. He did a great presentation at the Manhattan Institute over the summer where he talked about this big tense that the Republicans are creating and how crucial it is for small businesses to participate. And he has echoed that language. We heard that from him again in his testimony, how important small business is. So the fact that he understands that Main street needs to be leading this growth forward, I think is really huge. Let's hope that that means that he understands how this kind of regulation, because he's also a deregulation guy. Let's hope that he understands that this is important. But again, he hasn't been confirmed yet. He's not in place. So we're just, we're trying to work all these different angles.

[Glenn Beck]

Right. And I have to tell you, I, I like that we are using the system and not necessarily running this through an executive order, which could just be next president could come in. The best thing that could happen is it goes through Congress and they repeal it because then they have to relaunch it again the next time, not just, you know, undo an executive order.

[Carol Roth]

True. But at the same time, treasury does fall under the executive branch and treasury is the one that's putting this out. So if treasury says we're going to jettison it, yes, we could get it back again. But it would be a good step that I think would give Congress a lot of comfort in terms of going through with the repeal.

[Glenn Beck]

Okay, so let's talk a little bit about China. China is, I mean, it appeared last week and I said, I don't know if I said this on the air, but I said, what happened to China? I think it was last week when they really hit some real trouble in the overnight markets and it looks like their banks were collapsing, et cetera, et cetera. It looked to me like Bear Stearns, that this was the beginning, this was the warning sign that things are really dicey in China. Am I overreacting to that, so it's interesting.

[Carol Roth]

I think there are two camps here. And the camp that you're talking about is certainly the one that we're hearing more about. A lot of people saying, oh, China's gonna break. And you know, they're gonna, they're going down, they're in this deflationary spiral. Isn't that great? Of course, you know, me being the nerd that I am, Glenn, you know, I spent a lot of time reading economic research and there is this contrarian view that there are some metrics that are happening that don't really add up. And the fact that China may have more Runway than us actually says that this may be worse for us than China. So let me just give you a thought experiment for a second. So China is in this crazy supposed spiral. Everything's about to break. Where would the flight to safety in your estimation be if that were really the case?

[Glenn Beck]

If China were about to break? Yeah.

[Carol Roth]

Where's the flight to safety?

[Glenn Beck]

It would be the United States. Right.

[Carol Roth]

U.S. treasury markets. Right. That would be the safe bet. And historically, you know, last 10 years, when there's some kind of issue with the yuan, you would see that kind of showing up in the treasury market in a very correlated way. But the exact opposite is happening. We're not getting our yields down. When there's more interest in the treasury market. Right. There's more demand for the bonds, and the bonds and the yields trade in opposite directions. You would see our yields coming down now the Fed has cut rates in the 10 year yield. What's been happening? It's been going, it's been going up. So if China were in so much trouble, wouldn't everybody be flocking to the US Market? And wouldn't our yields be going in the opposite direction?

[Glenn Beck]

Why do you suppose they're not? What information does somebody have that's a.

[Carol Roth]

Signpost that says, well, maybe it's actually worse for us that this is happening and there's a, you know, a bigger issue at play than for China. Another one of these signposts, same kind of thing that with China potentially in this really bad situation, and maybe you've got tariffs coming down the line, all these things, you would typically think that they would be raising a lot of dollars. And to do that, they might be selling their gold. Well, what has China been doing? They've been selling piling. They've been doing the opposite. They've been taking it in. So we're getting these decoupling of macroeconomic rules that have been in place. And one of the theses out there. And I'll tell you, I'm not a China expert, but from. From an econ standpoint, I'm listening to all the different takes to see what makes sense. You know, we do not have a lot of Runway, and I'm sure we'll get into that in a little bit. And China has more Runway, so if things go a little sideways there, they have more options to fix it. Or maybe by them going sideways, that has a reverberation that actually sends us and the entire, you know, Western part of the world into a debt spiral. So the question is really, who's in a worst situation here? And so I think that, you know, the. The obvious answer is, oh, no, what's going to happen directly with China? And I think that the more important thing is what's going to happen with us as a result of what's going on.

[Glenn Beck]

Okay, so is China now in the situation where we used to be, they used to say, if America catches a cold, the rest of the world has pneumonia. Are we kind of in that situation with China yet?

[Carol Roth]

So I think it's in a different scenario. So I think that from us, it was from a hegemony standpoint that we were kind of the anchor of the global financial system. And so if we caught a cold, everybody else got a little bit of the sneeze that was sprinkled on them here. I think it's more sinister here. I think it's about what is China doing and perhaps Russia and some of these other countries doing, knowing that it potentially could put pressure on the Western world to create these debt spirals, to create these massive issues, you know, and to create, obviously, a lack of confidence in our currency, which, again, going back to what I was pointing about, the safe haven of the bond market, that that's no longer the safe haven. It does sort of raise, you know, somebody's eyebrow to say, why? Why is that happening? And it seems like China, who plays the long game, may be doing it intentionally. So I think, you know, we may be catching a cold more in the Wuhan way than in the traditional US.

[Stu Burguiere]

You'Re listening to the Best of the Glenn Beck Podcast. Hear more of this interview and others with the full show podcast available wherever you get podcasts.

[Glenn Beck]

If you have been following this show, I have talked about things for 30 years, and it is a little terrifying to talk to you about things that were all theory that I saw coming. And most people denied that it could even happen. And. And some people are still denying that it's going to happen. But I told you it would happen by 2030 and we are at the doorstep. And so it is very important that you understand this. We are at a place right now that could be remembered as the catastrophic moment for humanity. This week is going to be remembered and for one event. And not Donald Trump's inauguration, it's going to be remembered for one event. And that event is either going to be the largest catastrophe in humanity, the last chance we had to stop it, or the greatest thing that has happened to mankind since we learned to harness electricity. I honestly. And no one will be able to tell you which it's going to be. We will only know after it happens. What I do know is that we are at an inflection point with technology and we as humans are in tremendous danger. They announced this week the beginning of Stargate. It happened on Tuesday. Stargate is a brand new company that's goal is to build out massive AI infrastructure. Now I want to put this into perspective. You know when they said the planet will be destroyed and humans will not be able to live within 50 years or 100 years because everything's going to be destroyed by global warming. And we said, well, if you believe that, you should put nuclear power back on the table. We should be building the cleanest energy that is possible. And they said, well no, we've got to build new cars. And now you know, the fact that we don't have the infrastructure for electric cars, our power grid cannot handle electric cars, at least in any real amount. 30% of the countries on electric cars, the power grid won't hold. You know this because California, when it was having its rolling brownouts and blackouts, what was the first thing they said? Do not plug in your electric car. But nobody was talking about building nuclear power plants. Nobody was talking about changing the infrastructure. Everybody was saying it was way too expensive. We can't change the infrastructure of our power grid. But now that we are on the verge of AGI and asi, something that people will still deny is, is close, I'm telling you by 2030 it will be here, if not earlier. Now that we are on that horizon and we see that this is possible, all the powers that be, the same people that told us about global warming, the same companies that were trying to get us to eat bugs, the same companies that are have anti human policies, they were not about human expansion. They were about the opposite right control in the guise of saving the planet. Now that we are on this road for AGI or asi, suddenly we have to have nuclear power. Plants. I think it's Microsoft that just bought Three Mile Island. Wait, what? I thought that was the most dangerous place on the planet. Microsoft needs it for AI. Stargate is, is going to build massive infrastructure, especially data centers and electricity generation. You're going to see these anti human people now building electricity generation systems and cloud systems for AI to assist you. You're going to start hearing a word if you haven't already. You're not going to hear about AI as much as you're going to hear about agents. They'll be called AI agents. But you are. This is the last generation right now. This may be the last year that humans are not dealing with AI agents. This era is over. An AI agent is going to sound really great at first. It's going to be able to make your, your travel plans. It's going to be able to clean up your life. You won't have to have a secretary. Even people who are, are poor are going to live like they have a personal secretary at their disposal to take care of all of these things that they don't want to do. It's going to be mighty tempting. And AI agents, the first ones will be introduced in 2025. My, my feeling, when you get to AGI, artificial general intelligence, and they're as smart as you are, can do as many things that you can do and more, and are flawless at it, how are you going to say no? Now here's the thing. The AI revolution that is desired by big tech cannot happen. But it's going to. I've been talking about this for 30 years and if you've listened to me, I, you remember me saying, please, we have to have these conversations before it hits. It's too late. So we are out of good options. You know, we just saw them shut down AI because they did a test. If they tell AI to survive, or if it interprets its mission as a critical function, it will find the power and build electricity generation plants itself and drain our electricity in ways you will not spot until it's too late. It can build server farms without anyone suspecting that it's AI or an AI agent behind it. Now, President Trump is clearly very excited about this potential, as we all should be. We will cure cancer by 2030. That's quite a ballsy statement to make, but I believe by 2030 we will cure cancer. Who's against that? How can you possibly say no to these things? And the dark side of AI is it is the ultimate jailer. It will control your every move and every thought. Do you want China doing that. As I said, we are at a place where it's too late to have these conversations because somebody's going to get it. And Donald Trump wants to make sure it's us. And I think that's the best of the worst possibilities. Now he's excited about it as it pertains to economic development because whoever wins this will control so much. But it's principals, investors. The principal investors in Stargate, they have pledged $100 billion in initial funding and 400 billion more over the next several years. Side note, Elon Musk said they only have $10 billion. This is not going to happen. So is it going to happen or not? I don't know. But they are projecting the creation of 100,000 jobs or more. That's a good thing. But understand those jobs are just to build the infrastructure. These are not long term jobs. Now what's not getting a lot of attention that needs to is that the major players behind this project are not trustworthy. Do you remember when I was at AM Fest this year and I started talking about we've got to know who is involved with this administration because there are going to be chameleons that come in. I said this. So we have to look for the light that is between us. We have to know who the good guys are, who the bad guys are, who's actually on the team. And now that we have all of this popularity, suddenly Donald Trump is cool with everyone. We have to make sure that those who wear masks are not coming in and claiming to be part of this team and they have no intention of being on the team. Well, that's who you have now in this launch of Stargate. I want to go over this quickly and then I'm going to bring Justin Haskins in who can clear some of this up. But OpenAI, SoftBank and Oracle, led by Larry Ellison are three of the major figures that come up in the news reports. But there is another major financier. It's mgx. Now this is an extreme wealth tech investment firm based in the uae. The UAE government created MGX last year to be a leader in AI investment. The UAE government is closely aligned with the World Economic Forum and it has been for a long time. It co created the great narrative effort in the wef. That's one of the primary subjects in our book Dark Future. If you have not read Dark Future, you must go back and look at it. They are highly supportive of designing AI and other emerging technologies with ESG in mind. They are no friend to individual Liberty, at least any way that Americans would understand liberty. The UAE are also the same people who have said at the great narrative event that humanity needs a new great narrative because, and I'm quoting, soon our digital world will be as important as the physical world. They also said we're entering a new era of human evolution and a second wave of human evolution. All of this is in dark future. Their involvement from the UAE in Stargate should be deeply troubling. But what's made more disturbing is the fact that MGX is also a player in what I think is another hundred billion dollar AI infrastructure effort that was launched in late 2024. It may be rolled into this one, I'm not sure, but that project involves blackrock, not good people. Global Infrastructure partners, which has been taken over by BlackRock. Not good. Microsoft, not good. And the UAE, also not good. Now Microsoft and BlackRock, also heavily evolved in the Great Reset movement, worked closely with the WEF over the last years. And Larry Ellison, the man behind Oracle, is one of the central figures behind Stargate. He's on record gleefully predicting that AI will soon create the world's most sophisticated surveillance system. Discussing the surveillance system, Ellison said, and I quote, citizens will have to be on their best behavior, end quote. I want you to know there is a another completely separate movement that is happening that I believe is the antidote of this. You are not going to stop this, but you need to know what's going on. You must understand what's coming so you can be on the other side of this.