Best of the Program | Guest: Jeff Parker | 2/10/25

Summary

Podcast Summary: The Glenn Beck Program – Best of the Program | Guest: Jeff Parker | February 10, 2025

Introduction

In this standout episode of The Glenn Beck Program, hosted by the Blaze Podcast Network, Pat Gray fills in for Stu Burguiere to deliver an engaging and insightful discussion with guest Jeff Parker from ParkerVision. The conversation delves deep into themes of governmental corruption, corporate malfeasance, and the broader implications for American democracy. The episode, released on February 10, 2025, offers listeners a comprehensive look at pressing political issues, legal battles, and the state of the nation's institutions.

Section 1: Legal Battle with Qualcomm

The episode opens with Jeff Parker detailing his tumultuous legal battle against tech giant Qualcomm. Parker recounts a significant legal victory where his company, ParkerVision, secured a unanimous jury verdict against Qualcomm for patent infringement. However, shortly after the verdict, the aftermath revealed troubling developments:

Jeff Parker [18:35]: "We win a unanimous jury verdict. ... A few days later, there's this visit from the executive office of the President. And about a month after that is when the judge issued his final order... he reversed the jury verdict and threw the case out."

Parker explains how shortly after the initial victory, Qualcomm orchestrated a series of actions that undermined the legal process. This includes a high-profile fundraiser for then-President Barack Obama, followed by increased scrutiny from the Department of Justice (DOJ), led by Eric Holder, who had previously worked for Qualcomm's largest lobbying firm. Parker highlights the potential conflict of interest and the revolving door between corporate interests and government officials:

Jeff Parker [19:58]: "Eric Holder and the DOJ start to visit your website... he worked for Qualcomm's largest lobbying firm."

The discussion underscores the challenges faced by small businesses and innovators when up against entrenched corporate power, suggesting a systemic issue where large corporations can manipulate legal and governmental systems to their advantage.

Section 2: Executive Orders and Government Efficiency

Pat Gray transitions the conversation to President Trump's executive actions aimed at reducing governmental inefficiency and waste. Two prominent examples discussed are the elimination of pennies and the reversal of the Biden administration's stance on plastic straws.

Pat Gray [13:33]: "Executive order. Thank you. I mean, you know, takes $0.03 to create $0.01. What are we doing? That's the dumbest thing I've ever seen."

Gray criticizes the cost-inefficiency of producing pennies, labeling the move as "the dumbest thing" and emphasizing the redundancy of the coin in modern commerce. Similarly, the reversal on straw regulations is portrayed as a logical step back from ineffective environmental policies:

Pat Gray [14:31]: "By the way, he's leaving no stone unturned right now... ending the ridiculous Biden push for paper straws, which don't work. Back to plastic."

These actions are lauded as common-sense initiatives aimed at saving taxpayers money and rectifying misguided regulatory efforts.

Section 3: Corruption in Government and Corporate Sectors

A significant portion of the episode is dedicated to discussing the pervasive corruption within government institutions and large corporations. Pat Gray argues that the trust in government has been eroded, especially following the events of 2020, where government overreach during the pandemic highlighted deep-seated issues of control and manipulation:

Pat Gray [07:25]: "Haiti is just. It's a sad, sad situation. It's been ripped off by everybody in the world over and over and over again."

The conversation highlights the misuse of funds, such as the Clinton Foundation's $84 million donations and questions the allocation and effectiveness of such sums in producing tangible benefits, particularly in Haiti.

Pat Gray [07:00]: "We know they spend $84 million in Haiti... we have no idea. I don't know. That's a problem."

The discussion extends to broader systemic issues, including the overpriced Pentagon contracts and the influence of lobbying on legislative processes. Gray emphasizes the need for accountability and transparency, asserting that no individual, regardless of political affiliation, is above the law:

Pat Gray [24:54]: "America needs to understand this is not a political issue... If laws are broken, then justice has to be served. Period."

Section 4: Media Manipulation and Public Perception

Jeff Parker and Pat Gray critique the media's role in shaping public perception and perpetuating biases. They argue that the left has historically been anti-establishment, using media as propaganda tools to maintain control and suppress dissenting voices:

Pat Gray [31:34]: "The left says it's all conspiracy theories, but it's not conspiracy theories and it hasn't been broken up by speculation, but by their own emails... their own financial trails."

Parker adds that media institutions, which were once trusted gatekeepers of truth, have now become instruments of corruption and misinformation, exacerbating the public's distrust in credible sources.

Section 5: The Path Forward – Restoration of Integrity and Justice

In the concluding segment, Pat Gray outlines a vision for restoring integrity and justice in American governance. He emphasizes the importance of disciplined, peaceful revolution through truth, transparency, and adherence to the rule of law:

Pat Gray [31:32]: "This is the moment where we take our country back. It's not through violence, it's not through destruction, but through the power of truth and real justice."

Gray calls for collective action to demand accountability from all levels of government and to support policies that promote transparency and eradicate corruption. He stresses that the current moment is crucial for ensuring that the nation's institutions serve the people rather than entrenched interests.

Pat Gray [42:43]: "If you saw what was happening in Europe and in England where they're canceling now local elections... We have a responsibility for the freedom of all mankind."

Conclusion

This episode of The Glenn Beck Program serves as a compelling examination of the intersection between corporate power, governmental corruption, and media influence in shaping American society. Through Pat Gray's incisive commentary and Jeff Parker's firsthand experiences, listeners are presented with a critical analysis of the challenges facing the nation and the imperative for collective action to uphold democratic principles and accountability.

Notable Quotes:

• Jeff Parker [18:35]: "We win a unanimous jury verdict... the judge reversed the jury verdict and threw the case out."
• Pat Gray [13:33]: "That's the dumbest thing I've ever seen."
• Pat Gray [24:54]: "If laws are broken, then justice has to be served. Period."
• Pat Gray [31:32]: "This is the moment where we take our country back."
• Pat Gray [42:43]: "If you saw what was happening in Europe and in England where they're canceling now local elections... We have a responsibility for the freedom of all mankind."

Final Thoughts

The Glenn Beck Program continues to provide a platform for critical discussions on pivotal issues affecting American culture and politics. This episode, enriched by Jeff Parker's legal insights and Pat Gray's strategic vision, underscores the ongoing struggle for transparency and accountability in an era marked by significant political and social upheaval.

Transcript

[Glenn Beck]

This episode is brought to you by Meundies Underwear. Drawers are like the Wild West. You never know what you're gonna pull out or what shape it's in. So upgrade your collection with the buttery, soft comfort of Meundies. Meundies signature fabric is as soft as a warm hug from your favorite sweater. Plus, it's breathable and oh, so comfy, making it ideal for all day wear. Get 20% off your first order, plus free [e-mail] Spotify with code Spotify. That's meundies.com Spotify. Code Spotify.

[Pat Gray]

Did the US government actually pay for Chelsea Clinton's wedding? No, we don't know that. But we do know how much Clinton received through the foundation and how much they've been receiving of our tax dollars. And it's not going to improve your mood much. Also, Doge is rooting out corruption and it's not a political issue. Regardless of whether you have an R, a D or an I next to your name, you're not above the law. I go into that. And Jeff Parker from ParkerVision, he's been issued a cease and desist because he was on the program talking about Qualcomm a couple of weeks ago. He's on again to show you how much cease and desisting he's doing on what he says is the truth. All on today's podcast. First, let me tell you about Jace Medical. If you're planning on taking any trips in the foreseeable future, maybe a little summer vacation for the family. It'll be great. Unless you need medications you just can't get or somebody, you know, somebody always gets sick on vacation. I don't know why, but I always do. And if you're, if you're someplace, I don't know, up in the mountains or you're in a different country or whatever, and you got to go find a doctor, you've got to go find the pharmacy, et cetera, et cetera. Just call your doctor at home and say, hey, I'm, you know, I've got some, I don't know, Tamiflu, whatever it is that you want to take a Z pack. And I'm just going to start a flight, a Z pack now. We'll test later when we get home. Whatever it is, you want that medication on you, you want it there with you when you're traveling and when you need it, I want you to go to jace.com, enter the promo code Beck. Make sure you have the right medications on hand the moment you need them. It's Jace.com promo code Beck.

[Glenn Beck]

You're listening to the best of the.

[Pat Gray]

Glenn Beck program, Welco. Welcome to the Glenn Beck Program. Filling in for stu today is Mr. Pat Gray.

[Stu Burguiere]

Happy birthday, by the way. Happy.

[Pat Gray]

Oh, thank you, Pat.

[Stu Burguiere]

Happy. Happy birthday. I got you a nice present. Got you something.

[Pat Gray]

You did not.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, you did not. Yeah. Yeah. You're gonna be so surprised. You want me to open it for you?

[Pat Gray]

Oh, would you open it for you? I guess. I'm guessing. I'm guessing pants. Look at these.

[Stu Burguiere]

Are they beautiful? There they are.

[Pat Gray]

Okay, so first of all, what size are they?

[Stu Burguiere]

Yours? They're your size. Yeah.

[Jeff Parker]

Really?

[Pat Gray]

You asked.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah. Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

Really?

[Stu Burguiere]

I need Glenn Beck size and they had it.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah.

[Stu Burguiere]

So here.

[Pat Gray]

Do they still have the tag on it? Do they still have a tag on it?

[Stu Burguiere]

Do still have the tag?

[Jeff Parker]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

Okay.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah. I'm really surprised. These are Ralph Lauren. I thought they were Dolce and Gabbana or something, but no, no, no. Ralph Lauren.

[Pat Gray]

So, you know, I got Pat, as a joke on his birthday, that pair of pants in 1989. And we have been giving that pair of pants back and forth to each other every year since 1989.

[Stu Burguiere]

And surprisingly.

[Pat Gray]

And it's.

[Stu Burguiere]

They've. The. The pants have not gotten that much wear, you know, they still have the tag.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah, it's weird.

[Stu Burguiere]

It's really weird.

[Pat Gray]

What's strange, they still are just as in style as they were in 1989. How would you describe those? They're Pat.

[Stu Burguiere]

Apart from beautiful pink and orange.

[Pat Gray]

Is it pink? It's paisley. Yeah, it's.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, it's.

[Pat Gray]

It's more of a salmon.

[Stu Burguiere]

I didn't think Ralph Lauren did anything like this, but clearly he does.

[Pat Gray]

Oh, yeah.

[Stu Burguiere]

And then somewhere along the way, this beautiful shirt that goes with it is now yours as well. Is that beautiful?

[Pat Gray]

Really?

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

So when did we add that to?

[Stu Burguiere]

I don't remember, but I love it. So happy birthday. You're gonna look so good when you take Tanya out to dinner in that outfit. Oh, man.

[Pat Gray]

Oh, my gosh.

[Stu Burguiere]

I don't need to be there when that happens.

[Pat Gray]

But you know what? You know what?

[Stu Burguiere]

Ye.

[Pat Gray]

This might be the year to take the tag off of them and go out to dinner with you and Jackie.

[Stu Burguiere]

I'm sorry. We are busy that weekend.

[Pat Gray]

Really?

[Stu Burguiere]

Darn it.

[Pat Gray]

Yes. They'll let me into the most. Most elegant country clubs with that.

[Stu Burguiere]

Oh, they would.

[Pat Gray]

All we need is a jacket.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

Oh, yes.

[Stu Burguiere]

That's an idea.

[Pat Gray]

I've already thought about what I'm getting for you. I already know all right, all right, so let's see. Looking at the Doge stuff, and I want to talk about this next hour. We have to be really, really careful, because I don't know about you, but when I heard that we possibly paid for Chelsea Clinton's wedding.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, I do we have that substantiated, though, is that.

[Pat Gray]

We don't.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, I didn't.

[Pat Gray]

We don't.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

And that's why I wanted to bring that up.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

There's got to be careful with stuff going.

[Stu Burguiere]

There's a ton.

[Pat Gray]

Yes. A lot of stuff coming out online, and you can't quote this stuff. You have to be really, really careful because we just don't. We don't want to a. Wreck our credibility. And, you know, when we find out that it is absolutely true, that's when we can go and say, round them up. Yeah, let's put them in court.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, there's.

[Pat Gray]

It is.

[Stu Burguiere]

There's a viral chart going around that shows that Chelsea Clinton got, I don't know, something like $84 million from the foundation. From the Clinton foundation, and that 3 million of that went to her wedding.

[Pat Gray]

Okay. So I think. I think they did get $84 million.

[Stu Burguiere]

I think that went to the whole foundation. Right, it went to the foundation.

[Pat Gray]

Got it for the whole run.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

For Haiti or whatever. And, you know, we know they spend $84 million in Haiti because, I mean, look at the place now. Oh, it's beautiful. It's beautiful.

[Stu Burguiere]

Well, we were there how many years after the earthquake, and it still looked the same as if the earthquake had just happened. Oh, remember that?

[Pat Gray]

And the people from Haiti were saying to us, where's the money?

[Stu Burguiere]

Where's the $10 billion? Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

Because that could have rebuilt that.

[Stu Burguiere]

I could have rebuilt the entire country. 10 billion.

[Pat Gray]

About four times.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

Four times over, I think.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yep.

[Pat Gray]

It is. I mean, it. Haiti is just. It's a sad, sad situation. It's been ripped off by everybody in the world over and over and over again. And I think the Clintons are, you know, they kind of lead the way on the. On the charity for Haiti graft. Yeah, but we don't know anything about that. We know that the Clinton initiative did get $84 million, but we don't know any more than that. And, you know, honestly, if you're spending your tax dollars, I mean, that. That's what people have to realize. Even if it is, you know, even if it didn't go to Chelsea's wedding, which I. I would be. I'd be shocked if they were that Bold.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

But you know, this isn't an effective use of your money. And people who are looking and say, well, it was only $5 million. How much money have you paid your entire life in taxes? Because I guarantee you it's not going to be $5 million. It's not. Very few people have to pay $5 million in their lifetime of taxes. So that means everything that you paid, everything that you worked for, when you work four months a year to pay your income tax, all of that has been wasted your entire life. I don't know. I'm kind of about that. I mean, what could you have done with all of that money? And I just don't, I just, I don't get people who are, you know, again, like we said, I'm for aid. I'm absolutely for aid. I'm, I'm absolutely for looking at countries and saying, how can we help you if it's in our interest? And that's not aid, that would be development. But I'm not for most of the development that has been happening. I'm not interested in nation building, you know. So, you know, even if you're for that, are you cool with it going 60 cents on every dollar to the government officials or to the charitable officials and only 40 cents of that dollar? I mean, I'm not happy with that. We, we've gotten so used to corruption in our government on, you know, The Pentagon spent $400 on, you know, on a toilet seat. We're so used to that that we just expected this is not that this, the corruption that we're finding now is beyond imagination. It's, it's going to be hard for people to get their arms around what you're actually looking at because we expect a certain amount of, unfortunately a certain amount of corruption, but nothing like this. And if you're, you know, if, if you're a Democrat and you're inclined not to believe it. Okay, I can understand that. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt for a while. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say I probably would have been skeptical if Joe Biden, I would have been skeptical if Joe Biden would have come in and said we're going to route out all of the corruption. I would have thought, well, no, they're getting rid of anybody who is conservative on corruption. That's why I'm so excited about the Pentagon, because that's going to be a lot of conservative love. You know what I mean? So called conservative love. It's just graft and Greed and, and cronyism. But still, it, it's. We're supposed to be in love. The left is supposed to be in love with aid. We're supposed to be in love with death. I'm not, I, I'm not blind to either one of those things. But go into the Pentagon. I'd love to see them take. Do you see the, the congressman or the senator last week that held up a bag of bolts and said, this is about $10 at the store. It's $10,000 if the Pentagon buys it. Where's that money going?

[Stu Burguiere]

Incredible.

[Pat Gray]

Where is that money going? Who's getting that money? And you know, you would say, well, they're charging $10,000 a bolt because, you know, the aircrafts that they're building, they're so expensive and they can actually charge the price of what it takes. No, they're charging us the price with all of the overruns, all of the hundreds of billions of dollars in overruns, they're charging us that as well. So my question is, where do those billions of dollars end up in just the pockets of what McDonnell Douglas.

[Stu Burguiere]

Raytheon is.

[Pat Gray]

Raytheon is that, I mean, where does Congress. Is it just in the right.

[Stu Burguiere]

A lot, you know, a lot of it, you know, it is winding up in their pocketbooks. Has to be.

[Pat Gray]

And you know what really, what really bothers me is these people are taking our tax dollars and then they're giving that money through lobbying to our politicians who are allowing the corruption to happen. So it's just this giant circular. Just going to leave it at that. This giant circular something. I don't, I don't know what happens in circles, but there, there, there it is. By the way, the other thing that he, Trump said, first of all, he's getting rid of pennies. Did you hear that?

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, yeah.

[Pat Gray]

Executive order. Thank you. I mean, you know, takes $0.03 to create $0.01. What are we doing? That's the dumbest thing I've ever seen.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah. Especially when nobody wants pennies. Nobody uses them. Nobody. I mean, when they, if you ever use cash and you get pennies back, you just put it in there in their. Take a penny jar usually, and don't even want it messing up your pocket.

[Pat Gray]

Right. I mean, it's absolutely worthless to the American people and it costs costing our government 3 cents to make 1 cent. Finally, the President is. I mean, all of this stuff is so common sense.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

That's what's so frustrating about all of this. This should have been done long ago, but for some reason, we Just couldn't. We've known about the penny thing, but. Well, I've known about the penny thing when it was a cent and a half to make a penny. It's been that long ago. He's just.

[Stu Burguiere]

By the way, he's leaving no stone unturned right now. You got the penny thing and then he just did the straw situation. Did you see that? We're going back to plastic straws. He just signed an executive order or he's going to. Ending the ridiculous Biden push for paper straws, which don't work. Back to plastic. He tweeted out or truthed out. It's just. It's fantastic.

[Pat Gray]

Absolutely love that.

[Stu Burguiere]

I mean, it's amazing the things that he's covering at a breathtaking speed.

[Pat Gray]

Do we have the CBS anchor trying to explain how Trump's approval ratings are going through the roof? Listen to this. Cut 10.

[Jeff Parker]

What's driving this?

[CBS Anchor]

I will keep it simple, Margaret. He is doing in the eyes of the public what he said he would do in the campaign. There's political value in that. In fact, 70% of people say he's doing what he promised. That's whether they approve of him or not. Now, there's another part of this that continues over from the campaign. There were words that he was described as being tough, being energetic, and he still is today in big majority numbers. So as people take a look in these first few weeks, there's been a lot of activity. They're getting that general sense of governance, and that's being reflected in these early numbers.

[Pat Gray]

So that's perception. What about the actual policies?

[CBS Anchor]

Well, let's start with the ones that are popular. And again, these echo a lot of what we saw in the campaign. The idea of deporting those in the country illegally continues to be popular. We saw that in the campaign. 89% sending troops to the U.S. mexico border. Again, majority and savior. We've seen that in the campaign.

[Pat Gray]

Wow.

[Stu Burguiere]

Wow.

[Pat Gray]

I mean, it is. And they're just baffled by it. I don't understand. I know. Really? What if I told you the investment of, you know, little time today, you could actually get it paid off significantly and by paying significantly less for your phone service. But you'd also be dealing with a phone company that shares your values. Not, you know, not, you know, they're not sending money to Planned Parenthood. I hate that. If you're with Verizon, why are you doing that? Why? Why are you doing that yourself? Don't betray your own values. There's a choice, and you're going to save money and you're going to get exactly the same cell service. If you' one of the three big networks, you're going to get the same cell service. You're going to get it for less. They're going to give you a free month of service and it's, it's helping prop up the values that you care about. It's Patriot Mobile. I want you to go there now. Patriot mobile.com or call 972 Patriot. 972 Patriot get a free month of service with the promo code back. Switch to the Patriot Mobile today. Defend freedom with every call and text you make. Visit patriot mobile.com back 972 Patriot 972 Patriot Patriot Mobile. Now back to the podcast. This is the best of the Glenn Beck program. All right. Jeff Parker is with us. Jeff, how are you sir?

[Jeff Parker]

Good morning, Glenn. I'm fine, thanks.

[Pat Gray]

So let's go over the part just quickly about you sign a cease and desist, all of a sudden, two years later your technology is introduced by Qualcomm. They pretend as though. No, he did. What are you talking about? That's not your technology. That's our technology. You take him to court, jury rules in your favor. Unanimous. The judge says, I'm going to apply penalties. Then a couple of weeks after that Qualcomm has a fundraiser for Barack Obama. The head of Qualcomm has it at his house, Obama shows up. Then a couple of days after that they start the DOJ under Eric Holder starts to probe your website, finish that story.

[Jeff Parker]

Sure. So thanks for having me back again.

[Pat Gray]

You bet.

[Jeff Parker]

Yeah. So we win a unanimous jury verdict. We come back to the courthouse after that jury verdict and the judge hears the parties argue about what should happen next. And after listening to the arguments, the judge says, you know what, there is certainly going to be an ongoing royalty here, which is you know what? Qualcomm would have to pay us for the continued use of our patents and our technology. And we are all excited. We leave the courthouse, a few days after that we have a visit to our website by the White House, the executive office of the President of the White House. Just a few days before that visit, there's a fundraiser at the head of Qualcomm's home, one of the co founders homes, raising money for the dnc. And after that fundraiser, a few days later there's this visit from the executive office of the President. And about a month after that is when the judge issued his final order after having indicating before that his final order was Going to include royalties. He not only didn't include royalties, he reversed the jury verdict and threw the case out.

[Pat Gray]

Unbelievable. So Eric Holder was at the DOJ at the time you start getting visits on your website and you can track all of this. You have all of this?

[Jeff Parker]

Yes.

[Pat Gray]

Eric Holder and the DOJ start to visit your website, and it's only about this litigation. That's the only part they do. And lo and behold, we find out that Eric Holder, before he went to the doj, he worked for Qualcomm's large, largest lobbying firm. When he left the doj, guess where he went? Back to Qualcomm's largest lobbying firm.

[Jeff Parker]

Correct.

[Pat Gray]

So you're on the program, you lay all this out, and now what has happened?

[Jeff Parker]

So we're on your program about two weeks ago, and literally, Glenn, the next day, Qualcomm contacts our attorneys, and they say, if your client doesn't remove his social media and furthermore agree not to do any more social media, we're going to file a motion with the court to gag him to have this court take down the social media and prevent further conversation. And of course, my attorneys are handling a patent case. So they say to me, we're not really experts in First Amendment rights, freedom of speech rights. Could you please find an attorney who can help you with this? And so I ended up reaching out and we engaged Mark Kasowitz of his firm. And the Kasowitz firm is a very fine law firm that handles these types of areas and many other areas of law. But Mark Kasowitz, yeah, he's done a.

[Pat Gray]

Lot of work for Trump. Has he? Has he not?

[Jeff Parker]

He has. He has. Mark has handled a lot of President Trump's legal issues over the years. And I approached Mark, and he heard this request from Qualcomm, and he said, outrageous. He said, this is ridiculous. They can't gag you. So a couple days later, Qualcomm, in fact, filed a formal motion with the court that said, take down your social media and stop adding additional social media. And we were actually getting ready to file our opposition, but we first wanted to wait and see what the court was going to do. And a few days later, the court, finding this motion, frankly, meritless and without any basis for what they were asking for, ruled at the end of last week, just this last Friday. No, no, Qualcomm, you don't get that request. So that was absolutely. That was good. That was good to hear.

[Pat Gray]

That's fantastic. It's fantastic. By the way, I don't have any firsthand knowledge of this. But I will bet you that our new director of the FBI and our new head of the DOJ saw that Blaze article that lays all of this out. Just saying that might have well happened.

[Jeff Parker]

Well, Glenn, I hope so. I mean, look, what Qualcomm has accused us of is trying to taint a jury pool. We don't even have a trial date yet set for this case, so how are we going to taint a jury pool? But the thing that's really frustrating is the way they characterized our social media. And what we're saying is just completely false. Can I give you an example? So an example of their characterization is they say ParkerVision disparages the Judicial process in the middle district of Florida and maligns the fairness of the forum. Namely, ParkerVision impugns Judge Dalton's ruling in the prior ParkerVision trial, falsely claiming that he improperly reversed the jury's verdict as a result of collusion between Qualcomm and the administration of then President Barack Obama. Well, let me tell you, that's not true. What ParkerVision is doing is bringing public just facts. We're simply bringing facts. Here's the facts. The facts are the Department of Justice has been on our website 37 times. We discovered shortly before our first trial, all the way until 2022, when I filed a Freedom of Information act requ asking, hey, Department of Justice, what are you doing on our website? Why are you on our website so many days at the same time looking at the same pages as Qualcomm? Hey, what's this White House visit we had? Why were you only looking at litigation against Qualcomm on our patents? What's that about? We've never had that fulfilled. So I'm not drawing any conclusions what this means. I'm simply stating the facts. The facts are these visits happened, and we think we have a right to know what they're all about. That's what we're asking.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah, they're very suspicious, but that doesn't mean anything happened. But it is. I mean, you know, there's enough there. Not beyond a reasonable doubt, but there's enough there to go. You know, we should probably ask some questions here. Exactly the. There was a short seller. Can you. Can you tell me about the short seller? What's his name? Farmwald.

[Jeff Parker]

Yeah. So, you know. Yeah. So, you know, when Qualcomm accuses us of trying to influence a jury, again, a date hasn't even been set for a trial. It's pretty rich, Glenn, because back in our first trial, there was this persistent short seller who had been out posting on the financial message boards again and again and again trying to drive our stock price down. Our patents are no good. We don't have anything. Blah, blah, blah. Well, let me tell you, from the time we filed this case against Qualcomm in 2011 until we won the jury verdict in 2013, over two years, he posted 200 times. Every business day he posted and he posted predictions the patents would fall. They didn't. The patent case wouldn't go forward. It did. Oh, even if we won, we'd only win 10 or 11 million dollars. He was only off by a factor of almost 20. I mean, it went on and on and on. But here's the real punchline. We got to depose this guy and subpoena his emails. Because after Qualcomm lost the case, he filed challenges to our patents, which we found kind of suspicious. And guess what we figured out in deposition of this guy? Guess who he'd been working with when we filed our lawsuit against Qualcomm. Qualcomm, Qualcomm, Qualcomm.

[Pat Gray]

So do we have payments or. How do you mean working?

[Jeff Parker]

Well, it turns out that Qualcomm was paying some of his lawyer's bills because he was worried, apparently, about us suing him for something. I mean, if you're not doing anything wrong, what are you worried about? But he was worried about that. So he went to Qualcomm and he said, look, I'm not looking for you to pay me directly, but pay my legal bills. And our attorney said to him, so you don't consider that to be some compensation? No, I don't consider that to be any compensation. The point, though, is he was.

[Pat Gray]

Why would he need his legal bills? If I'm not mistaken, this is years before, three years before you knew that they were infringing, right?

[Jeff Parker]

Yes. So. So we. We believe that he actually started communicating with them even before we filed our. Our lawsuit. So there's list. There's a lot of fishy things here. But to keep it to the point of Qualcomm's motion to try to get us to be gagged. And it's pretty interesting that they'd be so willing to work with a party whose only mission was to put out mischaracterizations and falsehoods about ParkerVision, its patents, its technologies, et cetera. But then they turn around and accuse us of exactly what they were supporting back during the trial.

[CBS Anchor]

You're listening to the best of the Glenn Beck Podcast. Hear more of this interview and others with the full show podcast available wherever you get podcasts.

[Pat Gray]

We are, like I said, living in extraordinary times right now. And I don't, I, I don't mean that lightly. I've studied history now for decades. I've seen the patterns, I've watched how civilizations rise and fall. But what we're witnessing right now, I have not seen. It is so profound, it is so undeniable. And I believe it has the potential to save our republic if we handle things carefully. And this isn't just for Donald Trump. This is for all of us. For years we have believed this narrative about our government and it's been force fed to us through our government schools, that it exists to protect us from all harm, to even the playing field, to ensure justice and fairness for all. It was the wise manager. It is exactly what Woodrow Wilson wanted, a careful steward, a wise manager, an administrator that would just oversee things, that wasn't elected. The great equalizer. Now, many of us have been skeptical of this, but most people, good, decent people, trusted at the very least that their government was working for them, not against them. Now that has started to change over the last decade, I would say. Then came 2020, and suddenly that trust was shattered for at least half of the country. For the first time in modern history, governments across the world turned their power directly onto the people. They dictated where we could go, who we could see, whether we could open our businesses, hold funerals for loved ones. They told us that they were all doing this in the name of health, in the name of safety and in the name of science. But it wasn't about health. We now find out it wasn't about safety. It wasn't even science. It was all about control. And now, just a few years later, the truth is finally coming out. The very institutions that we were told to trust, the government is on our side. The government, the media, the so called fact checkers, the scientists, the corporations, the pharmaceutical industries have all now been exposed. This should be the moment of ultimate victory for anyone who has claimed to be a liberal my entire life. Did you hear what I just said? People no longer trust the government. Liberals have always been anti establishment. They've been told, don't trust the media, that's a liberal. The so called fact checkers, the scientists, the corporations and pharmaceutical industry. Tell me, who has the tradition of saying these things need to be broken up and kept away from our government?

[CBS Anchor]

The left.

[Pat Gray]

But now the left says it's all conspiracy theories, but it's not conspiracy theories and it hasn't been broken up by speculation, but by their own emails, their own records, and their own own financial trails. And that is what has them terrified. America needs to understand this is not a political issue. It's not left versus right. It's not Republican versus Democrat. This is something much, much deeper. It is about the corruption of the system itself. For the very first time in our lifetimes, the average, ordinary, American, hardworking person is seeing it, really seeing it. And it's a game changer. Now, this isn't a moment for us to gloat. This is a moment to be very, very cautious. This is not a moment to run around saying, I told you so. That's not going to help the country. What we need to do right now is something much harder. We have to be disciplined. We have to be diligent, and we have to be honest. We have to watch sources we're getting information from right now. It's like drinking out of a water hose, a fire hose. So you don't necessarily know what's true and what's not. And we cannot be reckless with the truth when the ground is shifting beneath us as much as it is. Credibility is absolutely everything. And if we lose that, we lose everything. The President knows this. I think Elon Musk knows this. And that's why it is so absolutely critical that we don't add to the destruction of credibility. Because anything that we say in, you know, rumors, like for instance, the Chelsea Clinton wedding thing, we talked about it last hour, we don't have any evidence that that is true. But that's going like wildfire everywhere. We should not be promoting that because I haven't seen the evidence. It doesn't mean it didn't happen. Doesn't mean it did happen. But let's wait for the facts. Otherwise they will use that to say, well, you said that it was Chelsea Clinton, and it will all become about Chelsea Clinton and not about the $84 million that went to the foundation. We have to hold people number two accountable, no matter whose side they're on. If laws are broken, then justice has to be served. Period. I don't care if they have an R or a D or an I or anything else after their name. I don't care that it was somebody that we all used to admire. No one is above the law. That's why I'm so excited about him going into the Pentagon. Yes, I'm excited about the Department of Education. Yes, I'm excited about usaid, but I am just as excited about going into the Pentagon. The waste there the third thing we have to do is make sure that we support logic, common sense and the rule of law. This is how people will win. This is a peaceful revolution. But makes, make, make no mistake about is an American Revolution done exactly the right way? We went to the ballot box, we won in a mandate. The guy running told us exactly what he's going to do and he's doing it. This is a legal revolution. The country will never be the same because of this. And you win. Not by shouting, not by rage, tweeting, not by tearing everything down, but by standing up calmly, clearly and saying, this is America. We have laws, we have rights, and we're not going to allow a corrupt ruling class to script, to strip them from us. This is a moment of reckoning. For years, Americans have been told they were wrong to question the narrative. We were censored, we were ridiculed, we were silenced. But guess what? In the end, the Bible is correct. The truth shall set you free. The truth will always come out. Right now, revelations are coming out at a pace we've never seen before. The money trails, the backroom deals, the censorship schemes, the revolving doors between government and industry, all of it is being exposed and you haven't seen anything yet. This is just the beginning. They're coming out with just raw data right now and saying, did you know that in the Treasury Department they never had to say what that money was used for? It just said, who got the check? It doesn't say anything. We have no idea. I don't know. That's a problem. Now let's wait until we see what the money was supposed to be used for and how much of it was used for that. Who are the people who did this to us? It's going to be on both sides, gang. But they're scared and they are scrambling. They're deleting old tweets, they're rewriting history, they're trying to downplay what they did. And this time it's not going to work because Donald Trump is being so incredibly thorough. The very institutions that told us they were the gatekeepers of truth are now being revealed as nothing more than glorified propaganda machines. Did you know that 90% of the media in Ukraine was paid for with your tax dollars? Of course they were saying things positive about the war. The so called fact checkers were working for the very corporations they were supposed to be checking. The journalists we thought were chronicling public life, they were on the take as well. The agencies that were supposed to protect the public interest were captured by Private interests. Now none of this is new. And both sides have charged this very thing for decades. The Republicans charge it against the Democrats, the Democrats charge it against the Republicans. I don't know about you, but I'm so sick of it. We now have the opportunity to get the facts and I want them on both sides. The moment, the opportunity that we have to restore what has been lost is going to be this moment. The corruption that has taken root in our institutions, it all has to be routed out. Two tiered justice system that protected the powerful while punishing the weak. Dismantled. The bloated, unaccountable bureaucracies that have been ruling over us without our consent, Shut down. Now this isn't going to happen immediately. We're going to have to make it happen. And it starts with a commitment from the people. Demand accountability. Even from the White House demand accountability. We will not be satisfied with empty apologies. We're gonna do it better next time. No. Anybody involved in anything that was illegal, anything that was bribery, anything that was shifting funds away from what Congress wanted or what the President wanted, they must be held responsible. Stand for the rule of law. If somebody broke the law, no matter how powerful they are. Justice. No special deals, no secret negotiations, no backroom protections. If it was Donald Trump Jr. Or Chelsea Clinton, they should be tried by a jury of their peers in a fair, just trial. If they broke the law, buh. By America. Now is your chance to stand for true transparency. No more classified memos. If decisions that are being made that impact us, we deserve to know the truth. We reject your fear. Once and for all. Fear is how they controlled us. It's how they got away with all of this. But it's up to us now. Say, I'm not afraid anymore. I'm not. And let me leave you with this before we get into the audio of what happened this week, because it's some really good stuff, you will understand. We are winning. The people are winning. Not Donald Trump, not maga. The people are winning. The fact that we're even having this conversation, that this information is finally seeing the light of day, is proof that we elected somebody. The first time in my lifetime that is actually doing everything they said they would do. The old guard, the corrupt establishment, the entrenched elite, the media gatekeepers, they've all lost their grip. More and more Americans are waking up. More and more Americans are questioning what they've been told. More people are looking at their leader saying, you're lie. You're a liar. You abused our trust. I'm not going to forget that. And that's why they're panicking. That's why they're scrambling. That's why they want you to stop paying attention. So don't pay attention. This is your moment. This is the moment where we take our country back. If you saw what was happening in Europe and in England where they're canceling now local elections. They're just usurping the will of the people. It is incredible. We're. We're. We may be the only one in the western world that's left to be free. We have a responsibility for the freedom of all mankind. This is the moment you take your country back. And it's not through violence, it's not through destruction, but through the power of truth and real justice standing together saying enough is enough. If we get this right, if we can stand firm, if we can hold the line, if we refuse to be silenced, we actually could fix our country. I never thought we could do that. We can. We need to be very cautious, very careful and steadfast. Vigilant support what's happening on the exposure of absolutely everything. Transparency will fix this country.

[Angel Reese]

Huddle up. It's me, Angel Reese. You can't beat the post game burger and fries, right? Know what else you can't beat? The Angel Reese special. Let's break it down. My favorite barbecue sauce, American cheese, crispy bacon, pickles, onions and a sesame seed bun, of course. And don't forget the fries and a drink. It's gonna be a high C for me.

[Pat Gray]

Sound good?

[Angel Reese]

All you have to do to get it is beat me in a one on one. I'm just playing get the Angel re special at McDonald's now.

[Pat Gray]

I participate in restaurants for a limited time.