Chip Roy (17:00)

Well, I'm doing great, Glenn. You just downgraded me, though. I'm a candidate for Texas Attorney General, not United States Attorney General.

Glenn Beck (17:07)

Sorry.

Unidentified Male Commentator (17:08)

Sorry.

Glenn Beck (17:09)

You're right.

Chip Roy (17:09)

No, no, no, no, no. But I'm delighted to be running for Attorney General for the Republic of Texas.

Glenn Beck (17:16)

Yes. So, Chip, when you saw this come from the governor. You and I have talked about things like this for a long time. This, this, this, that we should have done this with. With CARE and the Muslim Brotherhood a long time ago. Instead, under. I believe it started really under George Bush, but then it just got worse and worse and worse. We were letting CARE and the Muslim Brotherhood and everybody else into our own Department of Homeland Security. I mean, Dec, tell me a little bit about why it's important what Texas did. And then let's follow it up with enforcement of that.

Chip Roy (17:57)

Yeah. Well, first of all, you and I have talked about this for a long time, as I think I've talked to you on your show. It was the last substantive conversation I had with Charlie Kirk because it is very clear to me. It was clear to him. I think it's clear to you that our side for, for way too long, even today, although I think it's waking up, have been asleep to the war on the west that has been in process now for decades. And everyone's waking up to London. They're waking up to Paris. They're seeing now Dearborn and Minneapolis and then, oh, my gosh, Mom, Danny. Then they're like, wait a minute, there's a problem in Texas, too. And some of us have been saying that for a while and going all the way back to the Holy Land Foundation. Right, The Holy Land foundation, which was a Dallas, Fort Worth issue 25 years ago. You and I talked about that last time. But for listeners understand how long this has gone back, You've got unindicted co conspirators associated with the Holy Land foundation that are tied to care. You have care celebrating October 7th. You have all sorts of indications. Back to story yesterday in the New York Post, our friend Amy Mac and her great organization, they helped break that story and get it out in the world about the extent to which CARE is tied in their financial ties to the student issues on campuses, all of the connections that they've got to the radical terrorism that we've got to connect all of those dots. And now enter the governor. I think appropriately, you know, they've been targeting epic. They passed something in the legislature this last spring. But we got to be much more aggressive. The governor is right to be aggressive here. This will give increased scrutiny and tools, and I've got to dive into exactly what those tools are with respect to what it opens up at the state level. But the mere statement by the governor that both, you know, obviously deal with the Muslim Brotherhood, but the but care, that CAIR is in fact, an organization that we should treat as such is so critically important because it's masquerading as some, you know, oh, the Council on, you know, American Islamic Relations or it's crazy. Like it's and the idea that they should get tax breaks is insane, which is why I introduced legislation to take away their tax benefits. But that's the bare minimum, I can tell you. And I can't go too far into it. Lots of really good conversations are occurring with the appropriate officials, law enforcement entities in Washington to follow the money. We've got to follow the money. I believe that there is a criminal organization that is connecting all of these dots. You and I talked about that before. Not just the Islam issue and Islamification of America, but Also the Soros DAs, the open borders Antifa Southern Poverty Law Center. And by the way, SPLC is now putting a target on me because I'm daring to speak out about this. It's all connected. It's all connected, Glenn.

Glenn Beck (20:52)

So what is it the state can do? I mean, first of all, I think for anybody who doesn't understand and Texans, wake up. If you lose Texas, you lose the West. As Texas goes, so goes America, and as America goes, so goes the rest of the world. And, you know, if you're looking at Dearborn, you're looking at, you know, these places in Minnesota and you're seeing that, and you think that's not related to you. It is worse in Texas. The numbers in Texas are staggering. And what they're. I mean, just what's happening, happening in the small little town that my studios are in. It's the most diverse zip code in America, Las Colinas, Texas. And I have been ringing this bell for 12 years. When I first got there, I started doing stuff on the Sharia law, the movement to bring sharia law to Los Colinas, Texas. And Chip, I got to send you a copy of this interview I did. I did it with the imams of this, the biggest mosque in Las Colinas. And one of them, halfway through, just blurted out that, yeah, I mean, we all agree that hands should be chopped off, you know, if you steal. And I just let him go for a while. And it was clear Sharia law is happening. And now they are. They are. They have put these Sharia courts into place to handle things because, well, it's their right to handle it as a religion. No, no, not when it comes to. Not when it comes to usurping the Constitution of Texas or the United States of America. And that's happening now in Texas. So give me. Give the person who's not necessarily paying attention some idea of what is coming and is here already in Texas.

Chip Roy (22:45)

Well, first of all, you know, you've got an explosive growth of the mosques that are growing in Texas. We've got over 300 and counting more being planted in Texas every day than any other state in the union. You've got the Islamic center down in Houston, which is 150,000 square feet. That has, you know, major issues. You notice you saw that imam down in Houston that was going around saying, well, you can't put this on the shelf. You know, they're trying to take over and change what should be being done down there. That's implementation of Sharia. There are activist Sharia courts in Texas, which the governor rightly yesterday said that they're going to go shut down because they're in conflict with Texas law. And notably with what he's doing with the, with the declaration, the governor is making very clear that he can connect the dots with the legislation that the legislature passed with that declaration to say no land interest can be acquired with anybody associated with these organizations. Now, again, I think this is the tip of the spear. I think this is the. I don't want to. I don't mean this negatively. It's the kind of obvious, let's go after these guys. But there are myriad organizations that we need to go after and shut down. And let's be clear. I don't even know why we're allowing any foreign nationals to own Texas land. Like, literally. Let's just be very aggressive and very clear. I don't know why massive corporations are owning our land, by the way. Separate issue, but all related. I'm as bothered also by boardrooms in New York buying up our ranches and our meatpacking plants and everything else, because again, this is the Red Green alliance, the Marxist Islamic issue. It's all connected to root out and destroy Western civilization. So that is to say, what the governor did is really critically important. It is a step so that we can go stop some of these things in these enclaves like Epic City, but we need to be much more aggressive. And again, I introduced legislation, as you know, to vet people for Sharia law and adherence to Sharia law when we're admitting them into the United States. But today I'm filing a bill called the PAWS act to pause all immigration until we have sorted our crap out, until we've dealt with H1BS, until we've gotten rid of diversity and chain Mike diversity visas and chain migration, till we've dealt with Plyler veto, which, by the way, we need to challenge, which was the Supreme Court case saying that we must educate illegal children, until we've dealt with birthright citizenship, until we've cleaned up our mess, till we've put in place standards for not admitting people that are adherent to Sharia law, till we're removing people that need to be removed. Why are we importing more people? Let's put Americans to work. Let's stop destroying our culture. Let's freeze it in Texas. Let's do exactly what the governor is doing and more.

Glenn Beck (25:28)

Did you see what's happening in Germany? In Germany, one of their ministers said, there's no longer a problem in Syria. The war is over. It's peaceful. Everybody in Germany who came for, you know, refugee status to Germany, you're all going home now. They're not going to do it. However, they did strip citizenship from a Syrian immigrant who praised Hamas as heroes. And this same minister came out and said, you know, your citizenship has to be, you know, contingent on shared systems of values. And they're starting at least to talk about stepping up. I think this is the right thing to do. Have we thought about, we thought about if you have refugee status and your part of the world has now calmed down, saying, get out, go home.

Chip Roy (26:24)

Absolutely, we should do that. And we've been talking about that and the need to reverse, frankly, the abuse. So there's two elements, okay, the reversal of the abuse of asylum, parole, refugee laws that were abused. Right. We had people coming in who really weren't in need of refugee status or they weren't, you know, actually qualified for asylum and they were abusing parole. It was supposed to be a case by case basis. So there's that whole mess. Then when you even had a legitimate case for asylum or for refugee status, then we should review those and say, okay, guess what? Things have calmed down. You can go back. Those are very specific provisions in law, you know, that are designed about specific persecution or very specific situations in war or otherwise. And when that's no longer the case, then you no longer have the reason to have that qualified status in the United States. So should. We should address that. But let's remember, Glenn, and I think this is so important that we have to understand, like, we're talking about the Muslim Brotherhood. I don't have it right in front of me, but I read the, the proclamation by the governor, and he was pointing out that, you know, when that organization was founded, like 100 years ago or something in early last century, that it was. That it was founded, it was very specific about jihad and very specific about jihad being an obligation, right? And that that obligation comes from Allah, and that's for everybody adherent to Islam in the eyes of the Muslim Brotherhood. And so understand what's happening. And people need to realize that, because this is. Everybody wants to go and say, well, you know, we can't talk about this shit, because the First Amendment bull, that is not true, okay? First of all, we can talk about it because of the First Amendment. Second of all, we can talk about it because, yes, you can believe what you want, right? Our Constitution, our Bill of Rights says that. But when you are turning that into a political movement designed very specifically to undermine our country and to undermine the rule of law, then, no, you do not have a right to do that. You do certainly do not have a right to be admitted into our country. And we need to recognize that and address it or we're going to lose. And then we're going to be like Germany and we're going to be like London, we're going to be like Paris, and we're going to be looking around going, what do we do now? Right? It's, you know, we have 10% of the population and growing and, you know, 1500 seats in elected officials throughout the United kingdom. You've got 85 jurisdictions in Scotland where they can choose Sharia law instead of or, you know, as an alternative to Scottish law. We can't get to that point. We have to stop this right now. You're streaming the Best of Glenn Beck. To hear more of this interview and.

Unidentified Male Commentator (29:13)

Others, download the full show podcasts, wherever you get podcasts.

Chip Roy (29:17)

Okay, wow.

Glenn Beck (29:18)

Where do we even begin here? Let's, let's start with Jasmine Crockett. Yesterday she came out and she said that Lee Zeldin was receiving money from Jeffrey Epstein. And Lee Zeldin's like, what? No, I didn't. Now he knows that he did get money from Jeffrey Epstein, just not the Jeffrey Epstein. Another Jeffrey Epstein. Here is Jasmine Crockett trying to spin her mistake on CNN last night.

Interviewer or Narrator (30:01)

Listen to this Democrat who's been on defense over Jeffrey Epstein is Stacey Plaskett. She represents the Virgin Islands. She was texting with Jeffrey Epstein the day of Michael Cohen's hearing. Her questions pretty closely followed the text messages between the two of them to ask about Rona Graft, Trump's longtime assistant. You were defending her today, in recent days, yesterday. And you talked about Republicans taking money from a Jeffrey Epstein. Here's what you said.

Jasmine Crockett (30:33)

Who also took money from somebody named Jeffrey Epstein. As I had my team dig in very quickly. Mitt Romney, the NRCC, Lee Zeldin, George Bush win. Read McCain Palin. Rick Lazio.

Interviewer or Narrator (30:54)

You mentioned Lee Zeldin there. He's now a cabinet secretary. He responded and said it was actually Dr. Jeffrey Epstein, who's a doctor that doesn't have any relation to the convicted sex trafficker. Unfortunate for that doctor, but that is who donated to a prior campaign of his. Do you want to correct the record on the people that you listen?

Jasmine Crockett (31:10)

I never said that it was that Jeffrey Epstein. Just so the people understand, when you make a donation, your picture is not there. And because they decided to spring this on us in real time, I wanted the Republicans to think about what could potentially happen because I knew that they didn't even try to go through the fec. So my team, what they did is they googled and that is specifically why I said a Jeffrey Epstein. Unlike Republicans, I at least don't go out and just tell lies because it was not the same one. That's fine. But when Lee Zeldin had something to say, all he had to say was it was a different Jeffrey Epstein. He admitted that he did receive donations from a Jeffrey Epstein. So at least I wasn't trying to mislead people. Now have I dug in to find out who this doctor is?

Glenn Beck (31:51)

Can you just stop here for a second? There's so much to digest. We gotta just stop for just a second. You weren't misleading people because you didn't say it was the Jeffrey Epstein. You said it was a Jeffrey Epstein. What is the problem with getting money from Dr. Jeffrey Epstein? There is no problem. That'd be like. And Stubergear has been taking money from Bob Stevenson and what's the problem? He's been working for Bob Stevenson for years. He was delivering papers as a kid to Bob Stevenson's front door. Who's Bob Stevenson? There's not a problem with that. What do you, why would you go out and say, you know, if she had come out and said, you know what, Lee Zeldin was also taking money from Bob Stevenson and Jim first and Jen Burger Steenberg, I mean then it would be fine. You clearly were smearing. Not misleading, not misleading. What's the problem from taking it from other than poor Dr. Jeffrey Epstein? Oh my gosh, first of all, bad for that guy.

Unidentified Male Commentator (33:01)

That life sucks. That life does suck.

Glenn Beck (33:03)

That Life sucks.

Unidentified Male Commentator (33:04)

You're Dr. Jeffrey Epstein. You got to think about a name change. But there's hundreds of Dr. Not Dr. But Jeffrey Epstein's across the country.

Glenn Beck (33:12)

Hundreds.

Unidentified Male Commentator (33:13)

And I, I mean she was designed in a lab to make me happy. Jasmine Crockett. I, I, I love her so much. She is like if you could formulate the perfect Democrat, I think I would have to just put her out there. She just says the, she can't even get her bad defense right over this. She's trying to say, well I didn't lie. That's your defense. In theory. Right. I threw this in here. And I noticed that at the time we talked about it, I think was it yesterday that she said, hey, Jeffrey Epstein. Yeah, she did. She knew that she. And which actually makes it worse, right? Like, she knew she was lying. She knew there was a good chance this wasn't Jeffrey Epstein. But the last thing in the world you could say is that it wasn't leading.

Glenn Beck (34:03)

It wouldn't be a problem if you would say, look, all of these people have taken money from a Jeffrey Epstein. Doubt that it's the same Jeffrey Epstein. Might be, might not be, but, I mean, but at least it would be. No value. But at least you could say, I'm not trying to mislead people. I am trying to create doubt in people's minds. But I'm. I'm not saying he's taken money from Jeffrey Epstein. You know, when she just lists all of these people, I mean, let's look at her donations. Let's see if she's ever taken money from a Charlie Manson. You know what I mean? She's taking money from a John Wayne Gacy. I mean, hello, A Ted Bundy has been seen around her house. I mean, it's crazy. It's crazy. And she knew exactly what she was doing. And I hope that she continues. I hope she continues to gain power, yes, and. And love and respect from the Democrats, because she is insane. She's insane. She's so reckless. She's insane.

Unidentified Male Commentator (35:19)

She is. And by the way, this is the person that we are told that should be the face of the party, that they should lean into. The way she talks because she's such a good communicator and she gets on all these shows. Glenn. I mean, this is a massive problem in our politics, and it affects the left more than it affects the right, but it affects both sides in some degree, which is we are incentivized. The entire system is set up to reward people like her who just say the dumbest things possible and the most irresponsible and reckless things possible and get all the clicks. I mean, this woman's been on, like, Colbert. Why, She's a complete nobody who is.

Glenn Beck (35:58)

Wrong all the time.

Unidentified Male Commentator (36:00)

And she's getting on all these massive shows. She's getting booked everywhere. She's living the ultimate life of today's modern congresswoman. And what's gonna stop her? The incentives are right there for her to continue.

Glenn Beck (36:13)

Do you think that she doesn't know she's dead? I mean, because didn't a Crockett die at the Alamo? Was that her? I think it was her. I know a Crockett died at the Alamo. I'm not really sure. I'm not really sure. Just what a dope cling. Can I. Can I just point out. It's like I'm a part of a research team because she put her team on this.

Unidentified Male Commentator (36:35)

Yeah, we gotta get cracked.

Glenn Beck (36:36)

But quickly. But quickly. Yeah. And I mean, it was. I always thought that the Especially Congress research would have these amazing tools. No, they don't.

Unidentified Male Commentator (36:44)

And we, like, we.

Glenn Beck (36:45)

Our team struggles over this. We're constantly trying to stay ahead of the curve, and the last thing we do is Google. Google searches. Google. That's what you do at Congress. Yes, Research. That is what you do. That is what you do.

Unidentified Male Commentator (37:00)

Don't you have to fire your whole team after this? Like, if you were a rational being, I would be done.

Glenn Beck (37:06)

No, but she. I don't think. I have a feeling that her team briefed her. It's why she did say a Jeffrey Epstein.

Unidentified Male Commentator (37:14)

You're right.

Glenn Beck (37:14)

They briefed her and said, this is not. Probably not the same guy. It might have even said. If you're Googling, it might have even said Dr. Jeffrey Epstein. Why wouldn't it? If that's who gave that money, it Most likely said Dr. Jeffrey Epstein. And so they would say, it's not the Jeffrey Epstein. Yes, but that's okay. I mean, she clearly knew, so who's she gonna fire? This is what she wanted. Just the smear.

Unidentified Male Commentator (37:43)

Do we have time to play the rest of this clip? Because there's more to this.

Glenn Beck (37:46)

Go ahead.

Unidentified Male Commentator (37:47)

It's amazing.

Glenn Beck (37:47)

Play the left. Play the.

Jasmine Crockett (37:48)

Let's not. So I will trust and take what he says is that it wasn't that Jeffrey Epstein. But I was not attempting to mislead anybody. I literally had maybe 20 minutes before I had to do that debate.

Interviewer or Narrator (38:01)

Yeah, but people might see that and.

Glenn Beck (38:02)

Say, stop, stop, stop, stop. So you don't say it right. I literally had 20 minutes. So I. I didn't know that the sky wasn't on fire, that that was actually the sun. I only had 20 minutes before I said, my God, the whole sky is on fire.

Unidentified Male Commentator (38:22)

This is why I love her. This is why I love her. She had no idea whether the accusation she was making was true. And she didn't even consider not saying it. The only thing that she could come up with in her brain was whatever information comes in in this rushed time period, just go with it. Because.

Glenn Beck (38:42)

And it's like, do you know why?

Unidentified Male Commentator (38:43)

Why?

Glenn Beck (38:44)

Do you know why? And I don't know if she's smart enough to know this, but you can say whatever you want as a congressman on the floor of Congress. That's true. And you can't be held liable. So you could say the worst thing. You could say he was having sex with 4 year olds with Jeffrey Epstein and it could be a complete lie. And you cannot be held responsible because you said it on the floor of the House. That's why the standards are so low. The standards are absolutely so low for these Congresses. She could say whatever she wants. If she would have said that, not on the floor of the House, Lee Zeldin could sue her. Right. He could say you knew what you were doing. You were smearing me and my reputation intentionally. You knew exactly what you were doing and whether he would win or not, he could sue. She could have said, and he was having sex with a four year old. As long as she said it on the floor of the House, not a problem.

Unidentified Male Commentator (39:40)

This is the Harry Reid prison.

Glenn Beck (39:42)

That's how bad. Yeah, that is how bad. Our Congress is out of control. They've written all these laws for themselves to protect them so they can be completely irresponsible and it's fine.

Unidentified Male Commentator (39:54)

Yeah. I mean, I don't know if it's that or if she's just a dunce, because it's hard to know with her.

Glenn Beck (40:00)

She's just dishonest. She's just dishonest.

Unidentified Male Commentator (40:02)

Yeah, she's dishonest and bad at it. And that's one of the things I love about her. You know, she's not, it's not like she's pulling these things. There's no wool being pulled over anyone's eyes. It's, it's, it's just pathetic.

Glenn Beck (40:15)

Is there more to this? Can we play the rest of it out?

Interviewer or Narrator (40:19)

Play the rest, make it sound like he took money from.

Jasmine Crockett (40:21)

I did not.

Interviewer or Narrator (40:22)

Registered sex offender.

Jasmine Crockett (40:23)

No, but I literally did not know. I love that when you search FEC files and that's what I had my team to do. I text them and I said, listen, we're going up. They are saying that she took donations.

Chip Roy (40:32)

Right.

Interviewer or Narrator (40:32)

But someone might say, well, your team should have done the homework to make sure it wasn't the convicted sex offender.

Jasmine Crockett (40:36)

Not within 20 minutes. You could not find that out. Not from the law. I love search on fec. So, number one, I made sure that I was clear that it was a Jeffrey Epstein, but I never said that it was specifically that Jeffrey Epstein because I knew that we would need more time to really dig in.

Interviewer or Narrator (40:53)

Well, Stacey plaskett was texting the Jeffrey Epstein that we're talking about. You voted against the censure for her, to remove her from her committees. You know, we pressed the minority leader, Hakeem Jeffries, on this last night. Maybe you don't think she should be removed from her committees. Why do so many Democrats seem unwilling to say it's inappropriate to be texting with a registered sex offender about what you're going to ask a witness at a congressional hearing?

Jasmine Crockett (41:14)

So I'm not going to necessarily say that that's the case. Now, this is somebody that was a former prosecutor. Now, I haven't sat down and talked about all the specifics of why Stacey was doing what she was doing. I know that when she got up and she spoke, she talked about the fact that this is one of her constituents. At the end of the day, what I know of prosecutors is that they are typically talking to co defendants. They are typically basically talking to the people that have the best information. And what you had was you had the former attorney for the president that was sitting there and honestly, we knew, or she knew, or at least Jeffrey Epstein presented that he was very cozy with the President. He had more information. Registered sex offender or not. The bigger question is why is it that the president was so cozy with a registered sex offender even after he ultimately ended up with some of his convictions and seemingly he had absolutely been on the plane with him. We know about the birthday card. The bigger question is why is the President of the United States not the one that is in the hot seat for his relationship, instead of us saying, oh, you know what, we're gonna take her off of her committee because he decided to text her, stop, stop, stop.

Glenn Beck (42:18)

I can't talk anymore. I can't. I mean, literally, none of the stuff.

Unidentified Male Commentator (42:21)

She said there was true.

Glenn Beck (42:23)

None of it is true. And she's presenting it as absolute fact. CNN is allowing her to present it as fact. And the latest is the smear last week on the Epstein stuff. It shows that Epstein thought that the reason he was going to jail or going through all of the problem is because Donald Trump was the whistleblower. I mean, it's incredible what they can get away with. And all of this, absolutely incredible.

Unidentified Male Commentator (42:52)

All of that relationship happened before these convictions happened. I mean, again, I don't know that. She doesn't know that. But it's so fascinating to watch CNN's response to it, too.

Glenn Beck (43:01)

They give her nothing.

Unidentified Male Commentator (43:03)

How many times have they said, donald Trump says this without evidence? Where's that on the Jasmine Crockett allegations here, Right. How about the situation where, you know, Kaitlan Collins, who, at least, I will say at least kind of asks questions here, but she can't even take responsibility for them. She's like, well, some people are saying that you shouldn't just blurt out obvious lies in the middle of a House session. Like, what do you mean? Some people are saying. You never say that when it's. When it's the President of the United States.