Gene Hamilton (4:07)

Listening to the best of the Glenn Beck program.

Glenn Beck (4:11)

This is insane. We found out, I think it was last week there was a war on motherhood by the CIA. Newly released CIA documents reveal the Biden administration identified motherhood and homemaking as an indicator of white racially and ethnically motivated violent extremism. The intelligence assessment reveals top to bottom bias at the CIA under Biden. This is absolutely terrifying. Terrifying. How did we get to this place and why does it seem no one in America cares? Gene Hamilton, he cares. He's with America's first legal. He's the president and co founder. Gene, can you tell me and take us through some of these documents and what is being done?

Gene Hamilton (5:17)

Well, thanks for having me on. You raise very important points. It is absolutely insane that the United States government, in particular the intelligence community, would issue any kind of report that remotely touches anything like motherhood or traditional roles of marriage and homemaking. As being indicators of propensities to engage in any kind of terroristic or violent conduct or extremism of any kind. But what you have to do, Gwen, is you have to go back and you have to think. All right, now, actually, as a moment of clarity here, of course, thank you to the Trump administration for withdrawing this product. It was an actual CIA document that they published and that they have since withdrawn because it didn't meet their standards. But you then have to think, well, now, how is it that something like this comes to be. And I think that you and I and your audience at home all know that it's not all patriots working in the intelligence community. Many of them are, Most of them are, I would suspect. But there are a lot of people who get hired out of Ivy League schools, out of elite worldviews, and who think that Netflix movies are reality. And if you look at this product or if you look at some of the other products that they published, they seem to espouse viewpoints that you would see on some crazy Netflix produced movie that views white people or views traditional roles of marriage or motherhood as indicators of some kind of threat to our national security. And that, in fact, is insane.

Glenn Beck (7:07)

So I look at this and I think it is so insane. I have, I have no, you know, I have no inside knowledge of what everybody is tracking and things. But I'm, you know, not a casual observer of society and life in America. And the only thing I can think of as a motive is she who rocks the cradle rules the world. You've got to destroy the family. That is one of the stated. From the left, one of the stated goals, Destroy the traditional family. So you mark moms, you also believe in global warming. Mark moms, stop having babies. I mean, this is so insidious. But to be fair, is there anything that you can find in this document that shows. Well, that was. I could see how they read it this way. I can see how they took this information and said, maybe that's leading to extremism. I'm being way over gracious, but I have to ask.

Gene Hamilton (8:08)

Anything you have to ask, you have to ask. I don't think so. I mean, and especially when you consider this in the context of what other documents were produced during the Biden administration in public documents. And of course, documents that were, were classified, have subsequently been declassified. But remember, they issued in the Biden administration a domestic security strategy that identified conservative Americans, identified all kinds of traditional values as being threats to our domestic security. The Biden administration's entire team, their Apparatus viewed traditional Americans, white Americans or conservative Americans, military veterans, as the greatest potential threats to the security of the United States. I mean, it was the absolute ludicrousness of this just can't be, can't be overstated. I mean, it's wild. But that was their worldview and they created products. And from those products derive action. And from that action comes investigations and retribution campaigns that played out all across the country against various Americans. And so this is not just something that the American people should shrug their shoulders at and say, well, you know, it's kind of, that sounds a little silly. Silly Democrats shouldn't do that again. This is real dangerous stuff. And they have to realize this is what is going to happen again. If they get in power again, they will do this type of product again and we will all suffer the consequences.

Glenn Beck (9:46)

I have to tell you, I am, I am, I am convinced that our security apparatus is a danger to the Republic. It's absolutely a danger. And it should, you should never feel that way. You should be skeptical, but you should never feel like I think they're a danger to the Republic. And the reason why I say that is you can take this, what you have been calling a product, you can take it out, you can remove it. But what about the people who produced it? What about the people inside the agencies that didn't raise the alarm and say, what the hell are we doing?

Tristan Harris (10:22)

Right, Right.

Gene Hamilton (10:23)

Oh, absolutely. I mean, there has to be top to bottom review of the people who are involved in producing these products, contributing to these products, and there needs to be consequences for them. Now, of course, it's very difficult for us as average Americans to keep tabs on the employment actions within the intelligence community. I am confident, at least under this administration, that they're doing everything in their power to address it. But it's as you say, Glenn, though it is, it is not just this one product. You have to wonder, well, who else was in the agency at the time who was just okay with this happening? Who went along with it? Will they speak up in the future next time that there is some radical in, in the administration who's wanting to push a ridiculous product that has no basis in reality? Will they raise their voice? Will they speak up? Because if they didn't before, chances are they're not going to do it again and again. The main point being here, this, this is, this is extraordinarily dangerous. The consequences are significant and we all have to be aware of this as we go forward and we make decisions about things in the fall. In particular, Listen to this.

Glenn Beck (11:43)

The purpose is to. Of this document is to focus on women who are supporters or sympathetic to transnational white remvies. R E M V E. You know what a REMVY is? It's. Go ahead.

Tristan Harris (12:02)

Yeah.

Gene Hamilton (12:02)

No, I mean, it's just, you know, it's. Look, it's this, this has ties, it has connections also with this. Some of this trans ideology has ties with some of the folks who are engaging in just a modern weaponized war on womanhood. People who don't appreciate and value and support women as God created individuals who are distinct and unique in their capabilities and want to distort and change all concepts of gender in our society.

Tristan Harris (12:36)

To, to.

Gene Hamilton (12:37)

Again, you have to look, Glenn, you mentioned earlier the destruction of the family. The destruction of the family is the one thing that can help liberals and Marxists obtain power because it eliminates that support network. It eliminates so much. And they will take products like this, they will engage in other activities, they will do all kinds of things to destruct and destroy the family because that's another way for them to obtain power in the long run.

Glenn Beck (13:06)

And they're, and they're talking about this over in Europe and you know, that's the way the CIA gets away with it. But you can guarantee it has been. Come here. REMVY is racially and ethnically motivated violent extremist. So a racially and ethnically motivated violent extremists. I would say that there are those who are in BLM that fit that. I would say that there are. I would say that there are Islamists. The Islamist movement absolutely fits that. But then they say the mothers believe that their perception of an idealized white European ethnic identity is under attack from people who embody and support multiculturalism and globalism. It is under attack. I mean, this is, this is incredible. I mean, this is incredible. They do not actually identify anybody who is, is a violent extremist who is attacking those kind of, you know, visions of the future and visions of the past, if you will. They're not going after them. Just the people who are saying, wait a minute, I like my country, I like the culture that we have right now. I don't, I don't want to become that culture. Why? Why are they the only ones that are in the crosshairs?

Gene Hamilton (14:29)

Well, I mean, look, there's all kinds of reasons that we could get into. And I think one thing that we can just make clear for everybody, everyone listening here would rightly condemn anyone who wants to engage in any kind of violent extremism. On any basis. There's just no place for it but to connect. And to insinuate that just because somebody wants France to remain France is somehow going to be a violent extremist, is a threat is ridiculous. Because, look, I mean, what are they saying? Should Japan not remain Japan? Should it not have a Japanese character? Should Nigeria not remain Nigeria? Is there a problem with a person desiring for countries to have their own individual unique cultures? Again, it comes from this worldview, from these elite institutions. And some of the folks who get behind the creation of some of these products is that they, they. They think that it is, in fact dangerous for someone to think that America, you know, if you are a person who views the world based on merit and appreciates individual humans regardless of where they came from, but understands that it was founded on Judeo Christian values by individuals from Western Europe principally, then, you know, the notion that that's, that that was actually our, our history and that's who we are, and it's a fact, and there's nothing wrong with that continuing fact to, to. To maintain our identity is, Is just something that they're just not used to dealing with. And we're going to see more and more of this, Glenn, unless, Unless we stop these things, you're saying.

Glenn Beck (16:22)

Yeah, unless we, Unless we elect the right people. I mean, I am. I don't know about you. I'm sure you feel the same way. Gene. I am, for the first time, truly terrified of what is coming our way if these elections go and give the power back to the left, because it's not even to the Democrats anymore. The Democrats have been wholly eaten by the left and they are talking about purges and everything else. It is right, Very, very concerning. When you see this was happening under Biden. Good God Almighty. What would happen under a Marxist.

Tristan Harris (16:57)

Yes, absolutely.

Glenn Beck (17:02)

Gene, Besides the election, is there anything that people should be aware of or do?

Gene Hamilton (17:09)

Look, I think that again, just with all things in life, Glenn, we all have our own spheres of influence, and one of the most important things is spreading knowledge. This is a product. This particular product we're talking about today was declassified and withdrawn by the CIA, you know, I guess about a month ago, and it didn't get a whole ton of attention. There are a lot of people in your sphere of influence for the folks at home, your friends, your family, who have no idea, no knowledge about the existence of this product. And they would. They see things in the headlines. They believe some things. They think that, you know, maybe all the Trump administration's being radical and Here they're doing this crazy thing again and they really need to understand that. No, no, in fact, that's a narrative that's being painted here. That's not accurate. And in fact, on the other hand, look at what these people were doing. The last team that was in here amongst everything else that everybody already knows. We need to spread knowledge. We need to make sure that people are aware that these types of products exist. They are real, they are going to happen again. And there is no going back to some kind of moderate Democratic administration is not a likely thing that is going to happen in the future.

Glenn Beck (18:26)

Thank you so much. Gene Hamilton, thank you for being on and thanks for all of the work that you and all of your colleagues do every day. Appreciate it. America First League president and co founder. You bet. This is the best of the Glenn Beck program. And don't forget, rate us on itunes. Tristan Harris, center for Humane Technology, the co founder, former digital design ethicist. Tristan, how are you, sir?

Tristan Harris (18:55)

Glenn, it is always really good to be with you. And thank you so much for encouraging people to go out and see this movie that we're talking about today, which I should also be clear, by the way, I don't make any money when people see this movie. So I want people to hear both your call and mine, as this is a kind of a public service announcement to the world, much like, as you know, the day after that film in 1982 about what would happen if the US and Soviet Union did, you know, went to nuclear war. It's just meant to clarify and if we have clarity about where we're hurt, where we're headed with AI, then we can choose what we want to choose. And the emphasis is on agency, on choice. What do we actually want here? But I'm so grateful to be back

Glenn Beck (19:31)

with you on the program, Tristan, thank you for saying day after I was trying to find a comparison that is it that, you know, Ronald Reagan saw that movie and I think, I think somebody in Hollywood sent it to him saying, you know, thinking, you know, we'll change his mind. His mind was already made up really of nuclear weapons. He knew they were bad. That just clarified and he took that over to Moscow and gave it to Gorbachev and said, watch this movie. And that's what brought both of them to the table. And I'm telling you, you're exactly right. This movie needs to be seen. And you know what's so frustrating is this decision is all being made by somebody. At least we understood what nuclear weapons would do. We maybe didn't know it until that movie. We didn't have it visualized for us. But people don't understand what AI even is and what it can do. We're not at AI really yet. We're not at AGI. We haven't. You haven't even scratched the surface of what's truly coming. And it's being made by these eggheads and these billionaires who are, quite honestly, terrifying. Just terrifying.

Tristan Harris (20:46)

Yeah, yeah. Well, as you said, you know, back in 1945, all of us saw the photos and later videos of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and we saw, we knew intuitively the destructive power of nuclear weapons. Everybody got that evidence because there was a catastrophe. And with AI, most people's experience. Let's just tune into it. There you are, you use ChatGPT, your baby's burping in the background, and boom, you have a blinking cursor that tells you exactly what you need to know. So why in the world are we talking about AI as if it's nuclear weapons? This seems bizarre. And the truth is that what this blinking cursor, this friendly face obscures is that behind that blinking cursor are essentially like five soon to be trillionaires who are racing to create, as you just said, artificial general intelligence. They're racing to be able to replace all human economic labor in the economy. Everything that a human mind can do, all the marketing jobs, all the sales, all the media jobs, all the financial analyst jobs, every job, you know, mathematicians, physicists, like AI is going to be able to do all of those things. And I think something your audience needs to know is, are these companies to support the American worker? Are they in a race to augment and support you? Well, let me just like break this down because I think it's so important for people to get. These companies have taken on so much investment. This is literally more money has been invested into this than any other technology in human history. And they can't make up their that investment. If everybody just paid for a ChatGPT subscription, if everybody paid 20 bucks a month, that's not enough to make back their investment. If everybody, they just charge advertising for all the ChatGPT usage. So suddenly you have embedded ads everywhere. That's also not enough to make back the amount of money they've taken on. The only thing that justifies the amount of money that they have raised is that they can replace all economic labor in the economy. The $50 trillion labor economy. That's the incentive. As we said many times in this program with you, Charlie Munger, Warren Buffett's, business partner said, if you show me the incentive, I will show you the outcome. How did you and I predict social media back in 2017? If you saw that the incentive was the race for eyeballs and engagement and duration of use and frequency of use, you're going to get a digital brain rot machine, which is what's keeping all of our young people doom scrolling. And so with AI, the way that you can predict which way this is going to go is it's not short term, it's augmenting workers, it's helping you, it's a blinking cursor. But long term, these companies, their goal is not to do that. Their goal is to replace you. And I think that means that you won't have you and me and everybody else just has a regular job. You won't have political power after the GDP of countries starts to come from AI and data centers and not from people. Because now the companies don't need you for their labor and governments don't need you for your tax revenue. This is called the intelligence curse. That much like there are countries that discover a natural resource like Congo or Sudan or Venezuela, and when all of their GDP starts to come from that resource, what was a blessing of that resource becomes a curse. Because now the entire country kind of organizes itself around mining that resource. Well, in the case of intelligence, AI is the new resource. It's the new thing that's going to drive all economic growth. And the reason I'm saying this is not to scare your listeners. It's so that we can get crystal clear that these five companies and the five soon to be trillionaires that are running them, they don't have the interests of regular people at heart. And we can talk more about that. But I think it's so important for

Glenn Beck (24:18)

your listener to get that, Tristan. I mean, I wrestle with this all the time because I am engaged in building some AI and using some AI. We're trying to do it ethically and I am actually, it's allowing me to hire more people. I will always look at it as a tool, not as a replacement. I know if I wanted to, I could replace so much of my staff right now just by implementing all kinds of AI. But I don't want that. But these big companies, they don't. You know, as soon as you're traded on the stock exchange and everything else, it's all about profit, profit, profit. And that's exactly right. Stop this.

Tristan Harris (25:04)

Yeah, well, I think the way we, we, I mean, it's, it's not just about stopping. It's. It's steering. You know, I always say, you know, people always say, well, how could you possibly do something different? Because we're in a race with China, right? Well, yes, we're in a race with China, but also the AI companies have been using a bogeyman of China to say, that's why you have to keep funding us and keep accelerating us. We should just also be aware that the companies are using that narrative to drive up their goals and drive up investment into their products so that they can win against their competitors. But one thing we should say about the race is what are we in a race for? Because if we know, maybe we talked about this last time, but the US beat China to developing the technology of social media. We built a psychological bazooka called social media, but then we didn't actually govern it well, so we sort of spun it around and blew our own brain off. Did that make us stronger or weaker as a country? So we're actually in a race for who is better at steering and wielding the technology in a way that strengthens the full stack economic, military, you know, scientific and technological health and strength of your society. That's what we're in a race for.

Glenn Beck (26:08)

But I don't. You know what? I just don't. I don't even know who to trust, Tristan, because, you know, like this whole thing between the federal government, the, you know, the Pentagon and anthropic. I don't want either of them to have that kind of stuff. I don't want either of them to have it. And I don't know who's better and who's worse, you know?

Tristan Harris (26:26)

Yeah, yeah. No, really, I think what you're pointing to is a crisis of trust here. Because at the end of the day, it comes down to we're burdened new kind of power. It's power we've never seen before. When you have Nobel Prize level intelligence capability, like Nobel Prize level physics, math, engineering, coders, super coders, super cyber weapon, hackers, like, all of that embodied in an AI model that can just do unbelievable new things. It's an unbelievable amount of power. And the question is, who do you trust with that power? And the film, the AI talk is really getting into that. It's one of the failure modes. We call it dystopia. Like, how do you know? How do you centralize this power and have it not go badly? Well, one of the things is you can't centralize the power. We need checks and balances on it. We need oversight, we need democratic Oversight and regular people should have a say about how they want this to go. But right now, when we're living in kind of cacophony and confusion and people don't know what's really real about AI, what that means is that the companies win. The default path that's led by the companies and their incentives, that's what wins. And I'll just tell you that the handful of CEOs running these companies, they're not interested in what's good for regular people because they're only interested in what will enable them to win the race. It's how you get Sam Altman. Just two weeks ago, he was asked at the India AI Summit, the big AI summit happening in India. He was asked, well, doesn't it take a lot of energy to train and to run AI? And you know what his response was? Well, doesn't it take a lot of energy to train a human over 20 years? A lot of energy and resources and food. What he's basically saying is we shouldn't value humans. And this is why you get Peter thiel stuttering for 17 seconds. When he was asked by Ross Douthat in the New York Times, he was asked a simple question, should the human species endure? And he stuttered for 17 seconds before he could give a clear answer. I think both of these things are related. When AI becomes the principal driver of economic growth for countries and when companies don't need people for their growth or their development, then people ask the question, why should you value people? And so this is the last chance that our political voice as regular people, a human movement of regular people, this is the last chance that our political voice will really matter. And so what I'm deeply hoping is this film, the AI doc will need people to have clarity about where this is going, that while there are many benefits, we get new medicine, we're getting new materials and new science, and it's going to be very exciting. We're also going to get this mass disempowerment of regular people. And that's an anti human future. And so we have to get crystal clear on that so that we can basically act together as a community and steer this a different direction. There's a lot of ways people can do that. They can boycott unsafe AI products or AI products that are, you know, have bad safety ratings or are enabling mass surveillance. You know, people can do small things like grayscale their phone. You know, you had an advertisement for a product that tries to protect your likeness. Right? People can set a secret password with their Families so that you get a phone call and it's like your son and it sounds there, but you're not sure. A secret password. There's a lot of things people can do. I see it not just as an AI topic, but really about technology's encroachment on our humanity writ large. And just like social media encroached on our brains and our children, the most anxious and depressed generation, we can fight back against that. And that's what we have to do with AI too. We have to fight back against the default path. Be pro technology, but for steering AI, not stopping it.

Glenn Beck (29:48)

Yes, you're listening to the Best of the Glenn Beck Podcast. Hear more of this interview and others

Tristan Harris (29:53)

with the full show podcast available wherever you get podcasts.

Glenn Beck (29:57)

So 10 years ago, I sat on a plane with my then chief of staff and, and this all comes from something that we found in a show. Every day in our, in our show prep, I get a, I get a recap of the things I was talking about five years ago, 10 years ago, 15 years ago, 20 years ago. This one came up this week, 10 years ago, this week on the plane, and he asked, he said, where are we headed? What, what is, what is the world going to look like? What's America going to look like in 10 years? And so I talked about it on the air and I went back and listened to that show. It's pretty amazing. I laid out three possibilities. I didn't make a prediction. I said, there, there are three ways this could go, I think. And the first one was slow decay, not a collapse. You wouldn't point to it on the calendar and say this is when it changed, but just a steady erosion. Okay, corruption. These are my words. Corruption would become routine. Violence will become background noise. Currency won't die overnight. It just buys less and less, year after year, until you just have to adjust your expectations downward. The border will blur. Drugs will flood in. Institutions will continue to weaken, but they won't break. They just stop working the way they once did. That was option number one. I don't know, that's pretty close. The other one was a darker turn. Listen to this one, I said. Or we will turn not to chaos, but from chaos. But it will all be about control. A moment will come when the system decides dissent is a real threat. When the people who warned, protested, resisted, are no longer just wrong, but dangerous. And the label will change from opponent to enemy. And once that word sticks, you know what usually follows? That was option two. I don't know. I think we've Seen some of that. And then there was the more hopeful path that citizens would wake up. That grassroot movements, imperfect but loud. Might be a little messy, but they would remind the country who it was supposed to be. And people will look back and say, wow, that was the moment that it really turned around. That was 10 years ago. I think a little bit of all of those things happened, don't you? I mean, the slow declare decay. It's not a collapse, but erosion. Corruption is routine. Absolutely. Violence, a background noise. Absolutely. Currency hasn't died, just buys less. Year after year, we have to adjust our expectations downward. The border has absolutely blurred. The drugs are flooding in. Still are. The institutions haven't broken, but they weakened and things aren't working the way they used to. Okay. Add to that, I would say we have had the moment during the Biden administration where the system decided dissent was a real threat and they started to silence people. You know, people who warned and protested and resisted. I'm not going to take the COVID vaccine. You were all of a sudden dangerous. You weren't wrong. You were dangerous. And that's when we went from opponent to enemy. These people are trying to kill the elderly. And then the hopeful path. Path. Remember, this was 10 years ago. So we're talking 2016. What was happening 2016. What was happening in 2016? I said the last path is the hopeful one that citizens would wake up. A grassroots movement, imperfect, loud, maybe messy, would remind the country who it was supposed to be. And people would look back and say that was the moment it turned around. I think. I think all three paths happened at the same time. Bits and pieces. Here's what hasn't happened. We haven't decided which one. So in 10 years from now, what does the world look like? Well, it's not going to be a combination of all three. I can't give you, you know, a dark, desperate path.

Tristan Harris (34:19)

Path.

Glenn Beck (34:19)

A really dystopian path and a hopeful path because. And expect them all to come, you know, and do what this did. Because we're out of Runway. You have to choose. Do we slam on the brakes with this plane right now, or do we pull on the yoke and start to fly? We can't make that decision. That's the real problem. Because math is going to make the decision for us. Births are going to make the decision for us. Immigration, what we choose to do with our laws, how we vote. It's going to make the decision. If we remain apathetic and uncommitted. And I know a lot of people Say they're committed. But I ask myself today on the drive in, am I really committed? Am I really, truly committed? You know, I struggle with things just like you do. And there are times when I'm like, you know, but if I really was committed, I would do X, Y and Z. And the reason why I don't is I make excuses for myself. And I don't know if they're excuses or they're valid validation. I'm tired. I'm tired. You know, I, I don't have as much time. It feels like in my day or I can't last. I mean, I used to be able to go easy. Midnight. And when that would happen, I'm hearing myself back again, Sarah. And when that, when that would happen, I got a lot of stuff done, but I can't. My body just won't put up with that anymore. So I'm tired all the time. And I'm also a little cranky. I'm more crankier than I used to be. Is that an excuse or is that reality? I don't know. I don't know. But have we done everything we can? There, there's more that we can do, but not, it's not going to take a lot because I've been thinking about this stuff. For me, what do we do? Well, one of the things that we can do is we've got to just continue to speak out. We have to. You know, I saw a quote from Jefferson recently because I always, I just remembered it being a well educated republic. A well educated people can be entrusted with their republic. That's not what he said. It's not what he said. He said a well informed public. Well, that's totally different. That takes it away from all of the eggheads and that just puts it squarely on your shoulders. Are you well informed? You know, I just did a story last hour about trusting what you see in your social media feed. If you missed it, you'll find the story. It's an exclusive story@glenn beck.com today about how much of the viewpoints of the average Americans now, how much is being shaped by social media and what is the percentage of the social media just based on the war alone, how much is that coming from overseas and how much of that is made to look like it is being recorded here in America. A vast majority of it. This, this, this study I shared last hour is shocking. Find it@glenn beck.com right now and read that story. Once we are well informed, once we know what's true, what's not, then you have. You're able to form the conviction and say, you know what? This is a real problem. That's why today we released atstopthecontition.com an additional. How many hours? Six hours? Four hours. You remember many hours, many hours of raw interviews that we did in preparation for the special of, you know, Stopping the Conquest, the Islam Islamist plan to overthrow the United States of America and the Western world. But we also added a booklet, so it's free. You have to be a torch subscriber, but it is a free booklet. You can download it, I urge you, print it, share it with as many people as you can and get all of the information. Does not have my name on it. It's produced by me and my staff, but it doesn't have my name on it. Because I don't want that to be an obstacle for people. Go, well, I slap back. Because it has. It has nothing but the original documents in it. So you can make the case. It. It lays out the case, and then it gives you all of the documents that are all originals. So, I mean, they can argue with the original documents all they want, but we have to be informed. We have to know what's actually happening in our own country. And one of the things that we have to know is there is a real danger, a real and present danger from people who are here illegally. And I'm not talking about the people who are cleaning your house, mowing your lawn. Yeah, is that a problem? Yeah. It takes jobs from people, et cetera, et cetera. But we're in an existential threat. We are talking. Did you hear the story? The brother and sister who were indicted after authorities say that one of them planted a potentially deadly explosive outside of MacDill Air Force Base in Florida. This.

Tristan Harris (39:51)

We.

Glenn Beck (39:52)

This just happened. And I thought, brother and sister. What the. What is happening? What do you mean? There. What. Yep. A brother and sister. The brother. The sister's been arrested. The brother went back home to China. China. Hmm. That doesn't sound like a good thing, does it? Meanwhile, we have. We have our own governors that are aiding and abetting. That is the only way to say it. Aiding and abetting. When you have somebody who has been arrested for especially violent crimes. And you won't help. You won't. No, no, not help. You won't follow the law and call ICE and say, hey, by the way, at the back door, we're going to be escorting this guy out. You want him. He's an illegal. He's just. He's just stabbed and raped a woman. You Might want to deport them when they won't even do that. You're aiding and abetting. You're aiding and abetting. I'm going to meet with a father today. I'm dreading this. I have a pit in my stomach today. I am dreading having this conversation. I'm going up to the Chicago area and I'm talking to a dad who just lost their daughter. You know the story. Governor won't say anything. Nobody will say anything. Nobody will even recognize and killed by an illegal. It's not the one that just happened. This one happened before that one. Nobody. Nobody knows it. Nobody cares. It seems at least nobody in power. I'll bring that story to you on Monday. But now the New Jersey Democrat governor is now saying, we're not going to cooperate with ice. We're not going to cooperate with ice. Tell me, tell me, how can you be for. How can you be for empathy and justice. When you don't have any empathy for the victims and you make the perpetrator the victim? There's no empathy in you. You can claim, oh, I'm empathetic with the illegals. Well, you can be empathetic. I understand empathy for people who just want to make a better life for themselves and they saw an open border in America, didn't care about its borders, and came here to make a better life for them and their children. I have no empathy, none whatsoever, for people who are criminals, came from another country and went, I can be a kingpin in America because they'll never arrest me, and I'm going to rape and kill whoever I want I have. Who has empathy for that? You're not empathetic. You're a monster. You're a monster. You're not for justice. When you will have somebody who raped and killed an innocent person, raped and killed them, and you're wanting justice for them and not the one who was just raped and killed. Democrats, you got to wake up. You got to wake up. You are. You have trapped yourself inside of an insane asylum and you just think that it's okay. Well, because the other side is so bad. No, no, no, no gang. No. We are not like that. Are our policies getting your daughter raped and killed on the streets? Or are we the ones saying, hey, we should have less chaos? We should make sure that those rapists, I don't care if they're from here or they're homegrown, they should be in jail, or is your side the one letting them out? You're in. You're locked in an insane asylum and you have absolutely no idea. You are. You're drinking the giggle juice and you're pointing out the window at the same people going, look at these crazy people. You're the one in the nut house. You got to admit that or you're never going to get out. Eczema is unpredictable, but you can flare less with epglis, a once monthly treatment for moderate to severe eczema after an initial four month or longer dosing phase. About four in ten people taking mglis

Tristan Harris (44:32)

achieved itch relief in clear or almost

Glenn Beck (44:33)

clear skin at 16 weeks, and most of those people maintain skin that's still more clear at one year with monthly dosing. MGLIS Lebricizumab LBKZ, a 250mg per 2ml injection, is a prescription medicine used to treat adults and children 12 years of age and older who weigh at least 88 pounds or 40 kilograms with moderate to severe eczema, also called atopic dermatitis that is not well controlled with prescription therapies used on the skin or topicals or who cannot use topical topical therapies. EBGLIS can be used with or without topical corticosteroids. Don't use if you're allergic to ebglis. Allergic reactions can occur that can be severe. Eye problems can occur. Tell your doctor if you have new or worsening eye problems. You should not receive a live vaccine when treated with Eglis before starting ebglis. Tell your doctor if you have a parasitic infection. Ask your doctor about eglis and visit eglis.lilly.com or call 1-800-lilyrx or 1-800-545-597.