Sean Spicer (3:39)
It's these Doge people that just keep hyping everything and saying that there's problems, there's no problem there. $4.7 trillion that we just can't identify where it went. What, do you want a record now? My gosh. Keep calm and carry on. Yeah, you ever hear that? Just so what? There's 4.7 trillion. Do just keep calm, Keep going. Everything's going to be fine. So now people are paranoid in Washington. Listen to this story. Dad. Stu. This is. This is sad. This is very sad. Government employees are reported. Can we have any sad music, Sarah? Government employees are reportedly plagued with anxiety over the Department of Government efficiencies. Doge the access to various computer systems. Fearing surveillance of their communications, some employees are paranoid that their conversations, their emails, their texts could be surveilled with some purchasing Faraday bags to block electromagnetic signals or to inhibit potential surveillance. One employee at the General Services Administration responsible for government procurement. Procurement say they no longer carry a phone outside of the office. I used to carry my work phone around with me everywhere after hours on the weekend in case anything was needed. But now I won't take it out of my office. Now, the GSA says it doesn't have a plan to surveil its employees, but people are worried that they're being surveilled now. Now, I, I don't. I mean, I. I mean, I. I don't mean to be the bearer of bad news, but the government's been listening to you and everybody else for a very long time. What, you're just coming around to this? I think the government might be listening. No. No way. Now, add to that anything in your emails or whatever could just be taken without a search warrant. Your GPS location could just be given. Your banking records could be given to the FBI. Yeah, that's right. It could happen to you, but only if you're on the right and were in Washington on January 6th. That was the only way that could happen. So you were safe. You were totally safe. Or are you? This is a reason to make sure the government is transparent. I don't think there's anybody that wants to be surveilled by the United States government. That's kind of been one of our points lately. You know what I mean? We've been saying that for a while. Hey, they could become really dangerous because they have all of our information. And you were like, no, that's not gonna happen. I mean, I mean, unless you're for Trump. But that's crazy. Oh, okay. Okay. So yesterday, anti Trump critics have called for another boycott against the co. Founder of Airbnb. He's decided to. To join Doge. I don't know what he's doing. Maybe putting people up. I don't know. I don't know. $4.7 trillion missing. Maybe he can get a slice of that. I don't know. But he came out and he said that he was, you know, he was gonna go ahead and, and, and volunteer time for Doge. Okay, great. Oh, my gosh. No, not great for the people. I mean, the people who are the elites in Washington, you know, the ones that are having to sacrifice right now might. Might lose their cushy government job. I mean, they've had a job. They've been promised a job for life. You know what that's like, right? Never having to worry about your job, never having to worry about even a review because really, everyone around you sucks. Oh, man. And they might lose. Where's the sad music, Sarah? I need some more sad music for the government employees that might lose their job. Gosh darn it. Can you imagine not knowing if you could keep your job? A new boss. Try this out for size. You probably can't relate to this, but a new boss comes into your place of work, and you don't know if he's gonna like you, not like you, change direction. You could just lose your job. I know you can't relate to that, but for the very first time in American history, these poor employees of the government who were promised a job for life and pension better than any kind of pension you could ever get. They now question whether this new boss of theirs might fire them. I don't know how they deal. I don't know how they deal with it. Oh, my gosh, the stress they must be under. Just horrible, huh? By the way, Department of education has canceled $600 million in woke teacher training grants. You've got to be kidding me. So wait a minute. Are you telling me nobody's going to be teaching our teachers that little Susie could have a dinky sewed on to her body so she could be a boy? Nobody's going to teach that. What was so down again? Dinky. Okay, put right there. And nobody's going to teach that to the teachers, so the teachers won't be able to teach that to the kids. Oh, my gosh. This is chaos, people. This is chaos. Kind of like, see, I know you can't. I know you can't relate to this kind of chaos, but the teachers are now going to have to go into school and what they've known to be true their whole life, you know, that gender is fluid, that a boy could be a girl, that, you know, trans is cool, that drag queens, I mean, they grew up their whole life knowing that drag queens were cool for kindergarteners, okay? They knew it their whole life. And then all of a sudden, Trump gets in and everything changes overnight. Now, all of a sudden, you can't relate to this kind of chaos in your life, because this kind of chaos has never happened to you, where something your entire life, you think everybody believes something for their entire life. And then a group of people get into power and they're like, no, there's no such thing as kids being able to change their gender. Imagine what these teachers are going through, the chaos in their life, man. And what is Dosh doing? What are they doing really, Honestly, what are they doing? Let me give you this story. The Washington, D.C. nonprofit, a nonprofit, the Amica center for Immigration Rights, has been running advertisements on Facebook soliciting donations to disrupt Trump's deportation machine. Stop Trump's deportation dystopia. We'll see you in court, Mr. Trump. Now, you might not have ever heard of this ngo, but the federal government has heard about it. In fact, they received just last year $9 million as a subcontractor to provide legal services through the Department of Justice Legal Orientation Program. So this is like a quasi government agency. Here's the good news, okay? You're gonna love this. You've never heard of this group before. You might think, hey, I don't know. I mean, didn't they promise us at one point we wouldn't take federal tax dollars to pay for abortions? No, they never promised that. What are you talking about? You've got a faulty memory. I don't know. I'm kind of against illegal immigration. Why are my tax dollars going to fight against the law? Are you a Doge person? Are you somebody who likes Elon Musk? Are you somebody who doesn't understand that the biggest threat to the planet, an existential threat, will be dead in 10 minutes? We'll all be dead if we don't take care of global warming in the next, well, about nine and a half minutes. Now, hurry up. You're one of those people and you're for Elon Musk, you know, a guy who believes the same things that you believe about global warming and has done more, you know, for global warming than anybody else alive on the planet. But I see why you hate him so much because of things like this. He's going to make sure that every dollar that you pay into tax, which I know you love, because it's patriotic, right? Am I right? Hey, do your patriotic duty. Pay tax. And you love high taxes. You personally love them, right? It's not, oh, tax somebody else, not me. No, no, no, not with you. You love taxes and you just want them as high as they can possibly be. He's just making sure that the tax dollars aren't going to something that you don't necessarily agree with because it's unconstitutional. You know, like, right, you're for this one. You're for this one you want, because that one makes sense. But can you imagine if Those tax dollars, $9 million, Donald Trump use that to, to prop up, you know, a pro second Amendment ngo? That would be crazy. We'd have to stop that right now, wouldn't we? This is incredible what they are doing. They have zero credibility on any of this. Any of this. How do you defend this? Just this, just this $9 million? Well, $9 million. I don't know if you know this, but $9 million here, there and everywhere kind of adds up. Usually adds up to, oh, my gosh, where did I pull this number out? $4.7 trillion that the treasury just has no idea where they put that. Look, the world is easy to explain. Our government and what's happening is really easy to explain. So I'm going to slow the train down a bit more. Explain it. Why don't we just. Why don't we just imagine for just a second that our government is a restaurant, a bustling restaurant, okay? Where every section in the restaurant plays a vital role, okay? Because they want to create a memorable dining experience and make the people happy. At the heart of the kitchen is the chef, okay? In this restaurant, that would be called the President. He's the chef. He crafts the menu and oversees the culinary creations, all in line with the original purpose of the restaurant. So if it's an Italian establishment, he put goulash on the menu. That wouldn't be good. Every four years, the diners, the citizens if you will, the diners have the oppo opportunity to review the chef's performance and say yeah, you know, I don't, I, I don't like his fare. I don't think it's good, it's not good for the restaurant. After all, we the people, the diners own the restaurant. So in the dining area, the servers are elected. Members of congress interact directly with the patrons. They're elected every two years, they're hired every two years. Everybody in the restaurant, all the patrons have to say, you know what, I like him, I don't like him, replace him. But the servers do that cuz they're attuned to the immediate needs and the feedback of the diners. Now they can relay compliments and concerns to the chef, suggesting adjustments or new dishes based on patrons desires. However, they do not step into the kitchen to alter recipes or dictate cooking methods or tell the chef who to hire and fire. Their role is to represent the diner's voices and ensure their satisfaction. The chef in turn selects his own kitchen staff, the sous chefs, the line cooks, the dishwashers without any interruption from the dining room. And the same can be said for the, for the chef, he can't interrupt and tell which servers are hired or fired or which are assigned to which tables. That's not his job. Now the servers don't influence the chef's hiring decisions and vice versa. It's a clear boundary. Front of house, back of house. That way the whole thing runs smoothly. Now, just to make sure that this Italian restaurant remains an Italian restaurant, you've got a critic who comes in once in a while when there's a problem or a dispute. And when they start happening between the kitchen and the dining area area. The role is to assess whether the chef and the servers are adhering to the restaurants founding recipes and standards. Are they holding that true? They don't rewrite the menu or manage the staff and said all they do is just say yep, that was what was on the menu and looks like he's creating that. Recently there's been a stir in our governmental restaurant. The chef has decided to revamp the kitchen, bringing in new staff because it's been wildly inefficient and lacking of good flavor. Goulash is appearing on the menu however, some of the servers are attempting to stop the chef from hiring and Firing his own staff, challenging the chef's authority to manage their own team. Now the situation again akin to the chef trying to dictate which servers should attend specific tables. But this is disturbing the force. I feel like there's a million voices crying out and then suddenly silenced. The restaurant has the servers, the chef and the critic. In the early 20th century, some proposed a different model for our restaurant. Woodrow Wilson. They suggested that a group of experts should oversee both the kitchen and the dining area, believing they knew best what patrons should consume. This sidelined all of the direct feedback from the diners and concentrated the decision making power, leading to a disconnect between the establishment and the owners of the restaurant. In fact, it was never fully understood what they were doing or run by the patrons who only eat there. They're the actual owners. All three restaurant chef, the servers and the critic were part of a covert plan to hire someone unknown to the patrons who wanted to run the kitchen and serve only goulash. The chef is now making the changes to restore it to an Italian restaurant. That's all that's happening here. If you ever had an ounce of gun training, you know the age old rule. If you're going to shoot, shoot to kill. You don't shoot somebody in the leg. You never point a gun at somebody that you don't intend on killing. Our president is famously unaware of of that rule. Uh, what do you do when there's an emergency situation? It calls for action on your part, but it doesn't call for you to shoot to kill. The burner launcher is there. It's a non lethal alternative to safeguarding your home. It is legal in all 50 states, no permits or background checks required. It can be used by all age groups over 18. The burner launcher has powerful deterrents like tear gas and kinetic rounds. With a 60 foot range, one shot can incapacitate an attacker for up to 40 minutes. With the burner launcher, you can be confident that you're prepared to defend yourself against potential threats. Trusted by over 500 government agencies, police departments, security firms all over the country because they work. If a situation calls for action, but not for lethal violence, the burner launcher is exactly what you need at your side. Visit burnaby r n a.com glenn berna.com glenn save 10% off your purchase by r n a.com glenn now back to the podcast. This is the best of the Glenn Beck program. And don't forget, rate us on itunes. All right, let's go to Canada and one of our good friends up in Canada, Ezra Levant. Hello, Ezra, how are you?