Best of the Program | Guests: Sen. Rand Paul & Randy Clark | 12/9/24

Summary

Podcast Summary: The Glenn Beck Program | Best of Episode with Sen. Rand Paul & Randy Clark | December 9, 2024

Host: Glenn Beck
Guests: Senator Rand Paul (Republican, Kentucky) & Randy Clark (Border Patrol Retiree, Breitbart News)
Release Date: December 9, 2024
Network: Blaze Podcast Network

---

1. Introduction and Overview

In this special "Best of" episode of The Glenn Beck Program, host Glenn Beck engages with Senator Rand Paul and Randy Clark to discuss pivotal issues shaping American politics and culture. The episode delves into government spending, Donald Trump's evolving political stance, COVID-19 controversies, border security, and immigration policies, providing listeners with in-depth analyses and candid perspectives from influential figures.

---

2. Government Spending and Fiscal Responsibility

Timestamp: [02:17] – [04:14]

Glenn Beck initiates the conversation with Senator Rand Paul on the critical topic of government spending. Beck highlights the bipartisan concern over excessive government expenditures and expresses optimism about Senate Republicans' willingness to implement significant cuts.

Key Points Discussed:

• Waste Reduction: Senator Paul emphasizes a decade-long effort to eliminate government waste, referencing a comprehensive review that identified 2,000 pages' worth of wasteful spending. He advocates for executive actions to streamline operations, including the ability to fire underperforming personnel.

• Competitive Bidding: Drawing inspiration from Elon Musk's approach at SpaceX, Senator Paul suggests that government contracts should adopt competitive bidding instead of cost-plus models. This change would incentivize contractors to stay within budget, reducing the likelihood of overspending.

• Rescission Procedure: Senator Paul introduces the concept of rescission, a legislative method allowing the return of unspent funds to the Treasury. He notes that while past attempts required a 60-vote majority to overcome Democratic opposition, implementing rescission with a simple majority could expedite spending reductions.

Notable Quote:

• Senator Rand Paul: "We sent them 2000 pages worth of waste that could be addressed immediately. Some can be done through executive action." ([02:25])

---

3. Donald Trump's Leadership and Policy Shifts

Timestamp: [04:14] – [07:20]

The discussion transitions to Donald Trump's leadership style and policy directions compared to his 2020 campaign. Senator Paul acknowledges Trump's evolved focus and strategic appointments, suggesting a more disciplined and disruption-oriented administration.

Key Points Discussed:

• Cabinet Appointments: Senator Paul praises Trump's choices for key cabinet positions, highlighting individuals like Marty Makary and Jay Bhattacharya, who have been critical of mainstream COVID-19 responses. He foresees these appointments strengthening the administration's stance on public health and other issues.

• Fauci's Potential Pardon: Glenn Beck raises concerns about the possible preemptive pardon of Dr. Anthony Fauci. Senator Paul vehemently opposes this move, arguing that it would solidify Fauci's controversial legacy regarding the pandemic's origins and management.

• Release of Classified Information: The conversation touches on the need to declassify and release information related to COVID-19's origins and the FBI's investigations into Russiagate. Senator Paul stresses the importance of transparency to restore public trust.

Notable Quotes:

• Senator Rand Paul: "If the President pardons him, I think it'll just cement his role in history as being the architect of gain of function surgery." ([05:57])
• Glenn Beck: "Would you agree with me that Donald Trump's different than he was in 2020, that if we would have had him in 2020, it would have been a different situation entirely?" ([04:14])

---

4. Syria and Military Engagement

Timestamp: [10:50] – [12:55]

Glenn Beck shifts the focus to U.S. involvement in Syria, critiquing minimal military engagement and expressing concerns over the sustainability and effectiveness of current troop deployments.

Key Points Discussed:

• Troop Deployment: Senator Paul argues that the current deployment of approximately 900 soldiers in Syria is insufficient and fails to serve as a deterrent against hostile forces. He warns that inadequate troop numbers could inadvertently pull the U.S. into a more extensive conflict.

• Islamist Groups and Stability: The conversation highlights the presence of various militant groups, including Al Nusra and ISIS, and the complex dynamics involving Russian and Iranian proxies. Senator Paul emphasizes the need for a robust and well-resourced military presence to maintain stability and protect vulnerable populations, such as Christians in the region.

Notable Quote:

• Senator Rand Paul: "900 soldiers isn't enough to organize a parade. I mean, 900 soldiers is not who you go to war with. You want to go to war in Syria, you put 5, 10, 100,000 troops." ([11:33])

---

5. Presidential Emergency Powers and Legislative Reforms

Timestamp: [12:55] – [16:22]

Addressing the expansion of presidential powers, Glenn Beck and Senator Paul discuss legislative efforts to curtail executive overreach, advocating for stronger congressional checks.

Key Points Discussed:

• Bill Similar to South Korean Law: Senator Paul introduces a bill proposing that presidential emergencies require confirmation through a simple majority vote in Congress, rather than the current two-thirds majority. This change aims to prevent presidents from unilaterally maintaining emergency powers without broader legislative consent.

• Historical Context and Constitutional Principles: The discussion references the Constitutional framers' intent to separate powers and prevent tyranny by ensuring that no single branch holds excessive authority. Senator Paul underscores the necessity of reinforcing the legislature's role to balance executive power.

• Public Misconceptions: Senator Paul clarifies that the bill is a principle-driven initiative rather than a reaction to any specific administration, emphasizing its alignment with long-standing conservative values of limited government.

Notable Quote:

• Senator Rand Paul: "What we need now is a stronger legislature and less power for the central authority to balance that power." ([15:16])

---

6. Border Security and Immigration with Randy Clark

Timestamp: [18:30] – [28:50]

The episode continues with Randy Clark, a Border Patrol retiree and Breitbart News reporter, providing expert insights into current border security challenges and the impact of policies under the Biden administration.

Key Points Discussed:

• Migration Statistics: Randy Clark reports a significant decrease in border apprehensions, citing unofficial numbers of less than 50,000 for November compared to higher thresholds set by President Biden. He attributes this to effective border management tactics, such as preventing the use of "La Bestia" train routes by migrants.

• Mexican Government's Role: Clark observes that the Mexican government has been actively managing migrant flows by dispersing caravans and urging migrants to utilize official asylum processes. However, he anticipates that these measures will become less effective with the incoming Trump administration, leading to increased migration pressures.

• Impact of Drug Cartels: The discussion highlights the influence of Mexican drug cartels on migration patterns, noting that cartels have significantly raised the cost of crossing the border. Clark suggests that the Trump administration will intensify efforts to combat these cartels, potentially through military interventions and financial strategies targeting cartel operations.

• Mass Deportations and Sanctuary Cities: Clark anticipates large-scale deportations under Trump, leveraging existing repatriation tools and enforcing employer sanctions to reduce the hiring of undocumented workers. He also advocates for stringent penalties against sanctuary cities that fail to comply with federal immigration laws, proposing the conditionality of federal funds based on compliance.

Notable Quotes:

• Randy Clark: "Border crossings here in Eagle Pass that everybody witnessed on the news are down 80%. They were 250,000 in a month across the southwest border in December of last year. They are about 46,000 a month right now." ([19:22])
• Senator Rand Paul: "There are a lot that President Trump understands and his crew understands they can do to get a handle on a lot of these things." ([23:17])

---

7. Donald Trump's Media Engagement and Policy Stance

Timestamp: [29:00] – [43:00]

In the latter portion of the episode, Glenn Beck and a co-host discuss Donald Trump's recent media appearances, notably his appearance on Meet the Press, evaluating his interview style and policy propositions.

Key Points Discussed:

• Media Strategy: Glenn Beck critiques the adversarial nature of traditional media interviews, suggesting that Trump should diversify his media engagements to include non-confrontational platforms. He contrasts this with Barack Obama's extensive media appearances, which sometimes detracted from substantive policy discussions.

• Policy Proposals on Birthright Citizenship: The co-host analyzes Trump's stance on ending birthright citizenship, delving into constitutional interpretations of the 14th Amendment. They discuss the feasibility and legal challenges of altering citizenship laws through executive action versus constitutional amendments.

• Ukraine War Commentary: The discussion shifts to Trump's remarks on the Ukraine conflict, where he criticizes the high casualty rates and questions the U.S.'s role. Glenn Beck supports Trump's viewpoint, linking the war's devastation to previous Biden administration policies.

Notable Quotes:

• Donald Trump (from clip): "If I won that election... Ukraine would have never happened. It would have never happened." ([41:30])
• Glenn Beck: "Amen. He's absolutely right... when you see Blackrock owning the farmland, then maybe we'll start to have some idea of how grotesque this really was." ([43:00])

---

8. Conclusion and Final Thoughts

Timestamp: [43:00] – End

Glenn Beck wraps up the episode by reiterating the key discussions and emphasizing the importance of informed and decisive leadership in addressing the nation's challenges. The episode concludes with mutual appreciation between Beck and his guests, underscoring the collaborative efforts to promote conservative values and policies.

---

Key Takeaways

• Fiscal Responsibility: Emphasis on reducing government waste through executive actions and competitive bidding to ensure efficient use of taxpayer dollars.

• Leadership Under Trump: Recognition of Donald Trump's strategic shifts and robust cabinet appointments aimed at disrupting the status quo and addressing critical issues like COVID-19 and immigration.

• Emergency Powers Reform: Advocacy for legislative changes to limit presidential emergency powers, ensuring greater legislative oversight and adherence to constitutional principles.

• Border Security: Insight into current border dynamics, the role of Mexican authorities, and anticipated Trump administration policies to enhance border security and combat drug cartels.

• Media and Policy Engagement: Analysis of effective media strategies for political leaders and the complexities surrounding policy proposals such as ending birthright citizenship.

---

Notable Quotes with Timestamps

• Senator Rand Paul on Government Waste: "We sent them 2000 pages worth of waste that could be addressed immediately." ([02:25])

• Senator Rand Paul on Fauci's Pardon: "If the President pardons him, I think it'll just cement his role in history as being the architect of gain of function surgery." ([05:57])

• Senator Rand Paul on Legislative Power: "What we need now is a stronger legislature and less power for the central authority to balance that power." ([15:16])

• Randy Clark on Border Apprehensions: "Border crossings here in Eagle Pass... are down 80%... about 46,000 a month right now." ([19:22])

• Donald Trump on Ukraine Conflict: "If I won that election... Ukraine would have never happened. It would have never happened." ([41:30])

• Glenn Beck on Revealing the Truth: "When this is over and the body count is actually revealed... then maybe we'll start to have some idea of how grotesque this really was." ([43:00])

---

Conclusion

This episode of The Glenn Beck Program offers a comprehensive exploration of pressing national issues through insightful dialogues with Senator Rand Paul and Randy Clark. From fiscal reforms and presidential powers to border security and international conflicts, the discussions provide valuable perspectives aimed at enhancing governance and upholding constitutional values. Listeners gain a nuanced understanding of the strategies proposed to navigate the complexities of American politics and societal challenges.

Transcript

[Glenn Beck]

Big show today. Senator Rand Paul, Randy Clark on the border and Donald Trump went back on Meet the Press over the weekend. Talked about RFK Jr vaccines, Ukraine and so much more. We go over all of it on today's best of podcast. First let me tell you about Lear Capital. Gold backed currency. Gold backed currency. This is what the BRICS nations are moving towards that cripples the United States. Now is the time to be thinking ahead and do something like the brick nations are doing with gold to back your account. I'm not talking about, you know, I gotta have everything in gold. Have 10% of what you've saved in gold. You know how much money your, your money, your dollar has lost. It's lost fortune in dollars. Gold has actually made money or actually just held the price of what you actually have saved. Build a hedge against the insanity of what' all around the world call Lear capital right now. 800957 gold. 800957 gold. There is a high price to pay for the last four years and we're not even close to paying it yet. 24 hour risk free purchase guarantee. They're the only ones that do it. Make sure you ask them how you can get up to $15,000 in bonus gold or silver with qualifying purchase. It's lear Capital at 800-957-GOLD. 800, 957.

[Producer]

You're listening to the best of the Glenn Beck program.

[Glenn Beck]

We have Senator Rand Paul on with us. I got to talk to him about a couple of things. A, staying out of war in Syria. Two, Anthony Fauci, is he going to be pardoned? But let's start with Doge. The Senate Republicans hopefully are ready to just slash government spending. And hopefully we do it in the fashion that Calvin Coolidge did it back in the 1920s. Senator Rand Paul, welcome to the program.

[Senator Rand Paul]

Hey Glenn, thanks for having me.

[Glenn Beck]

You bet. So how serious do you think this Doge thing is?

[Senator Rand Paul]

You know, I think it's very helpful because you know, the problem is not just Democrats in Washington, it's big government Republicans.

[Glenn Beck]

Correct.

[Senator Rand Paul]

And I think Elon and Vivek bringing attention to this. We've already offered up, I've been for 10 years collecting and arguing that we should get rid of waste. We sent them 2000 pages worth of waste that could be addressed immediately. Some can be done through executive action. I think you can let people go, you can fire people, you can fire people for cause. You can also change the contracting. You know, one of the things Elon did at Space X was he started bidding on things and they started doing it through competitive bidding as opposed to cost plus. The bid companies, Boeing and Lockheed, would get their contracts and say, oh, we bid a billion dollars. Oh, sorry, we came in at 2 billion. Well, you get 10% of whatever you come in at. So in fact, here's an incentive to come in over budget.

[Producer]

Right.

[Senator Rand Paul]

So there's a lot of things they can do and I hope they will do. On spending reductions, there's a special procedure where if we send $1 billion to the administration to build a ship and they build it for 800 million, they can send the 200 million back to us through a special procedure called rescission. And it gets an immediate vot privileged vote. And it's a simple majority. Most of the problems we have is getting to 60 votes to undo bad things the Democrats have done. But with this case rescission, reducing spending that is sent back to us by the President, it's a simple majority. However, we tried to do this in the first Trump administration with a really small bill, $15 billion cut, and it failed because Republicans voted with the Democrats to keep the spending. So we have to do this. We're going to have 53 in the Senate and only one or two majority in the House. We've got to see if we can actually get the majority of Republicans to vote for spending cuts. If they all do, we can cut significant spending.

[Glenn Beck]

Would you agree with me that Donald Trump's different than he was in 2020, that if we would have had him in 2020, it would have been a different situation entirely?

[Senator Rand Paul]

I think he's much more focused now. His picks for his Cabinet, I think, are light years ahead of what was going on in 2016, for sure.

[Glenn Beck]

Yeah.

[Senator Rand Paul]

And he really wants to disrupt. He is not going to allow the status quo. He saw the status quo use the apparatus of government to come after him individually. And he realizes that in 2016, but again through 2020, that our intelligence agencies were being used against him. Both retired and I believe active, went after the whole Hunter Biden thing to say it was Russian propaganda. And it turned out the propaganda was actually US Propaganda, calling it Russian propaganda. And FBI needs to clean out be cleaned house cash. Patel, I think can do it. Dni Tulsi Gabbard, I think can do it over there. And he hasn't picked, you know, moderate, weak need Republicans. He's picked strong people. On the COVID front, picking Marty Makary, a doctor from Johns Hopkins, and Jay Bhattacharya, a doctor from Stanford who've been leading leaders and pointing out this nonsense. These are people I would have picked. So I'm over the moon with some of these picks.

[Glenn Beck]

So what do you think is going to happen? I mean, the White House is saying that Fauci may be pardoned in advance of anything, which doesn't seem like you could do that, but they'll try it anyway. I mean, at least it has to be. Everything just has to be dumped and exposed.

[Senator Rand Paul]

I've sent referrals, criminal referrals, on Anthony Fauci twice to the Department of Justice, justice, without really response. Merrick Garland hasn't done his job. He's probably been the most partisan attorney General we've ever had. I will send those referrals again. If they preemptively pardon Anthony Fauci, it will seal his fate as the architect, author and godfather of the pandemic. He's the one that funded it. He's the one that funded the research in Wuhan. He's the one that allowed the research not to be screwed up. People don't quite get this. There was a safety committee that was supposed to scrutinize dangerous research. It was set up because of fear of exactly this happening. There have been scientists talking about this for 20 years, worried that this is going to happen. Anthony Fauci sidestepped the safety committee and allowed this research to go on. Then when it came forward that he had done it, he's like, oh, nothing to see here. We didn't really do it. Oh, well, we funded EcoHealth and they funded Wuhan, but, oh, nothing to see here. And then he had the gall to say it wasn't gain of function and it wasn't dangerous. That's all I. All that's come out. And really we have him in his own words, we have him in private saying, oh, we know it's really dangerous there, and we know they do gain a function research. So we've got him dead to rights. If the President pardons him, I think it'll just cement his role in history as being the architect of gain of function surgery.

[Glenn Beck]

So, but. But will we release this? This is the one thing I'm hoping Cache Patel does. I hope he releases just the raw evidence that has been gathered. You know, kind of. Kind of like the Twitter files where we can see all the stuff that has been classified that should be seen by the American people.

[Senator Rand Paul]

With regard to Covid, we voted unanimously to declassify all of it. So this was over a year and a half ago. The FBI did do their job. They did a report and they said that they thought Covid came from the lab, that the virus or the pandemic started with lab leak. But they haven't released their report. They've been told to declassify it. I truly believe Cash Patel will look at that. And the way you declassified is this. If there's a name in there, you don't want somebody to know a name or a source. You take that out of the report. In fact, even when I read and see classified things, I almost never have seen a name or a source, which I think is good. You protect your sources. But I should get to see all the information. And really, in this case, the American public should see all of the information. Anything to do with Russiagate, anything to do with the abuse of the FBI to go after Donald Trump, all that has to be publicly released as well.

[Glenn Beck]

Well, on Friday here in Fort Worth, Texas, there was a judge that ordered Pfizer to release and produce all of its Emergency Use Authorization file to a group of scientists that want to look through it. And they've been saying, well, we can't do it, we can't do it. And the judge finally just said, do it now.

[Senator Rand Paul]

Yeah. We've never had someone like Donald Trump or like these appointees, and that's why first line of battle is getting them through. There are many establishment Republicans, you know who they are.

[Glenn Beck]

Yeah.

[Senator Rand Paul]

Who are weak, need or frankly just no better than Democrats that are looking to destroy Donald Trump's picks. And so I'm going to be working very hard for Robert Kennedy, for Tulsi Gabbard, for Cash Patel. These are, you know, those three right at the tip of my mind are have a lot of establishment Republicans questioning. And we got to make sure we get them through. And we got to make sure everybody, you know, listening to the radio, everybody out there is calling their, particularly Republican senators and saying Donald Trump needs his team.

[Glenn Beck]

How long do you think. I mean, do you think he's going to get these. What do you call them, out of, out of session appointments where. Because it took him like two years to get all of his appointments. He didn't even get all of them in two years. He needs them right now. But I hate the precedent that that would set.

[Senator Rand Paul]

The vast majority, the vast majority will be very quickly, I can tell you. I am hopeful that I will be chairman of the Department of Homeland Security. So Kristi Noem's nomination will come to my committee. My plan is, if elected in the next couple of weeks in January to be the chairman. I will have a hearing for her before the inauguration, as soon as he officially appoints her. After the inauguration, I may be able to have a vote that day. Sometimes we will vote that day. So while some of it was slow in 2016, the Secretary of State, Homeland Security, several of these important positions were filled pretty quickly, and we plan on doing that again. I would be surprised in the first week if we don't have four or five cabinet level people appointed voted on in the first. In the first week.

[Glenn Beck]

Let me switch topics to Syria. The president made it very clear that this is not our issue. You know, I went back this weekend and looked at a story from 2016 where the CIA was supporting one side and the Pentagon was supporting the other side in Syria, and they were fighting each other. And now the president, the current president, whoever that is, you know, bombed Syria over the weekend. And, and I just have this bad feeling that the industrial, military, industrial complex wants to have a war somewhere. And Donald Trump is coming out and saying it isn't any of our business. I know where you stand on war. What do you see coming?

[Senator Rand Paul]

I agree completely with Donald Trump on this. And the people who took over the rebels who won, their new name is a new name given to an old group called Al Nusra, which were associated with Al Qaeda. So they were Islamist, meaning that they were for a radical, fundamental sort of nature of Islam that doesn't treat women well, doesn't treat Christians well, et cetera, a very primitive form of Islam. Well, they've been fighting there for a long time. There's also another group called ISIS that is actually somewhat the same fundamental Islamist. And then there are also other groups there as well. There have been the Russians there, there have been Iranian proxies there, there have been Assad there. Caught in the mix are hundreds of thousands of Christians who have always had sanctuary since the time of Christ, frankly, and are at risk. And so we have 900 soldiers. 900 soldiers isn't enough to organize a parade. I mean, 900 soldiers is not who you go to war with. You want to go to war in Syria, you put 5, 10, 100,000 troops, and you don't put 900 troops in there, they become targets. Not a deterrent. They're not deterring anything. But if some of them are killed, and I hope this doesn't happen, then all of a sudden, maybe we are drugged into the middle of a civil war where there are no good people on, on either side of it.

[Glenn Beck]

Let me, let me ask you one final question about. You've got A bill coming out that's similar to the South Korean law, which I don't even know what happened in South Korea. I'm still confused by that. Where the U.S. senate would allow presidential emergencies to continue only with a majority vote in Congress, which I 100% back. What does this mean to all of the emergencies that we have dating way, way back that are still in effect?

[Senator Rand Paul]

They expire. And currently, if a president has an emergency, the emergency can only be stopped by Congress if Congress votes to stop it, but then the president would veto it. So it really takes a 2/3 vote of Congress to stop an emergency. My bill would actually change it. Where it's a simple majority. We don't have to vote to stop it. It stops automatically by statute. We had this in Kentucky in our state government. Our governor shut down the hotels, made it illegal to travel, made it illegal to go to church during COVID and the legislature couldn't stop him because they were in session. So when they finally came back in session, our Kentucky legislature said governor's emergencies last 30 days, then they expire less affirmed by a majority of the legislature. So this reverses it. Instead of needing 2/3 to stop a crazy governor or a crazy president, it actually takes a simple. You have to have a simple majority to affirm it. So it really completely flips this on its head. And it's what we have all wanted. And some partisans will say, oh, this is against Donald Trump. No, I had this under Harris. I had this under Biden. I've had this under. I've had this bill for years. And both Mike Lee and I have fought on this out of principle, nothing to do with who the president is.

[Glenn Beck]

I don't want. I don't want any. I don't want any president to have this kind of power. We have got to reduce the power of the President of the United States. And if he goes in and does everything by executive order, we lose because the next guy will come in and do exactly what Biden did and just cancel it all. We've got to get back to a debate, to reason and to Congress and the Senate actually doing their job.

[Senator Rand Paul]

This is something that people need to realize that it's not new because people get caught up in the situation. They think it's about one person or another. The constitutional position of conservatives and limited government advocates has always been that, as Madison said, we divided the powers, we separated the powers, and we wanted to pit ambition against ambition. In other words, the ambition of people to try to take power would be pitted by the others. Trying to keep them from taking power. But over the last hundred years since fdr, the power of the presidency has gradually expanded. And what we need now is a stronger legislature and less power for the central authority to balance that power. Again. This was sort of Montesquieu saying that when the executive legislates, when he has both the power to execute and legislate, that's when liberty fails, that's when tyranny arrives. And so I don't know, people just need to realize this has nothing to do with an individual, a new president, an old president. It has all to do with constitutional principles that have always motivated those of us who believe in limited government.

[Glenn Beck]

I think there's a lot of people awake to exactly that message. And your time is right now. Rand, thank you so much. Appreciate it. Senator Rand Paul from the great state of Kentucky. Try Relief Factor. That's what they said. Got inflammatory properties, helped get out of pain. They said. They said that a lot. And you know what? Turns out they were right. My wife was the one who said, yeah, you got to try everything. Okay. All right. All right. It has taken away so much of the pain I used to live with. It's unbelievable. I got my life back. It's a daily supplement. So it's not a drug. It's all natural daily supplement. And all it does is it reinforces your body, it helps your body fight the pain and fight the inflammation which is the source of most of the pain in our bodies and a lot of our disease as well. It's 100% drug free. It was developed by doctors to help reduce or eliminate pain, whether it's neck, back, joint, muscle pain, relief pain, or I mean, relief factor can help you relieve the pain, feel better, stop masking your pain and start fighting back naturally. Give Relief Factor a try. Try their three week quick start now. It's 1995, less than a dollar a day. @ relief factor.com relief factor.com or 800, the number four relief. 800 the number four relief. Now back to the podcast. This is the best of the Glenn Beck program and we really want to thank you for listening. Welcome to the program from Breitbart News. A Border Patrol retiree, Randy Clark, a guy who's really been following what's going on on the border is on with us. I wanted to talk to him about a couple of things. First of all, Randy, welcome to the program. Have you seen any difference in Mexico and on the border since Donald Trump? I think it was last week, talked to the president of Mexico and said you know, things are going to change. Is the military of Mexico, have they done anything different?

[Producer]

So we haven't seen a significant posture change. They are still actively keeping a lot of migrants in southern Mexico from Mexico City all the way to Tapachula. There's been some loosening from my sources in Mexico on the highway checkpoints. But the train that La Bestia train that we have seen thousands and thousands of migrants use to get to the to the border, it's basically void. You know, they're still very strongly doing that. So my sources unofficially have said the number has reduced for November apprehensions to less than 50,000, which is important because that's the threshold. Remember the 2500 threshold per day that President Biden set in his executive order to deny asylum? We're well under that. We're close to 1200 a day nationwide. So it's staying pretty slow along the border thus far.

[Glenn Beck]

Yeah, it needs to go even. The number needs to rise on the trip back. Are you seeing any movement at all on people who are either on their way to the border turning around or people that are here getting out? If we have any indication of that?

[Producer]

No, we certainly don't. What we know is we're seeing caravans assemble, we're seeing the Mexican government allowing them to walk for a few days, get tired, and then dispersing them to cities around southern Mexico, urging them to wait for a CBP1 appointment or to use the CHVN parole program right now. But that's the complicating factor, Glenn, is that's definitely going to end as soon as the hand hits the Bible and President Trump is sworn in. We're assured that that's going to end. So that's 1450 people allowed in daily through ports of entry along the southwest border and another thousand a day through the airport. So you're looking at nearly a million people a under those two programs alone. They're going to shortly find out that they're not going to get any appointments scheduled after January 20th. So the question is, how is Mexico going to kind of keep a lid on that pressure cooker they're going to have in a few short days?

[Glenn Beck]

We are talking to a retiree of the Border Patrol and a great reporter for Breitbart News who is really an expert on this, Randy Clark. Randy, the drug cartels have made so much money, they've doubled the price since Donald Trump got into office of getting across. I personally think this is just my opinion, but I think that we're almost in bed with these drug cartels and almost in business with him in some ways. Donald Trump has said he's going to take him, take him on, and I think he will militarily. What's going to happen to, let's say, the new president of Mexico if she has to start cracking down on these cartels? People usually die in her position in Mexico.

[Producer]

And I think we're seeing, you know, not an acknowledgement that she's going to be somewhat different than the predecessor in Mexico who believed in the hugs and not bullets. There are still some battles between the Mexican government and the Sinaloa cartel going on, although it's not highly publicized. But the murder rate there is through the roof. The murders continue in Mexico. So if she doesn't cooperate with the United States, they're still sitting on top of a horrible death rate for Mexican citizens in every state, really, in their union. So I think it behooves her to cooperate, but we must act. When you look at how many children and young adults are dying from fentanyl, it's marketed poisoning of our youth. So it's something that I take the president at his word, too. My last year before I retired was under Donald Trump, and the same folks he's nominating to run this Department of Homeland Security were involved in the policies and practices that saw us reach the lowest number of border crossings. They've got this all on the drawing board already. I think they're just going to enhance it and run it into high gear as soon as they get in January and be, be very creative about how we undo this mess we've seen over the last three years.

[Glenn Beck]

Yeah, Randy, I too know a few people that he has hand selected that are, no nonsense, people that are gearing for this. What would the, what would the reaction of Mexico and the Mexican people be if we just started sending SEAL teams in to take these cartels out?

[Producer]

Well, you know, I think in some Mexican states, they would probably welcome that because, you know, if you look to see what El Salvador is doing right now and you see the phenomenal impact Bukele's, you know, policies are having on crime there and the murder rate, that's the way we all want to live. None of us want to live in a place where you can't enjoy your surroundings and move and your children aren't safe. So I think you'd have some people in Mexico saying it's about time. The question is, can we push them to do for themselves? And I think we can. And I, and I think we've seen that since January Right now, border crossings here in Eagle Pass that everybody witnessed on the news are down 80%. They were 250,000 in a month across the southwest border in December of last year. They are about 46,000amonth right now. So we can see what Mexico can do if you, if you really put the pressure on. And nobody better than President Elect Trump knows the leverage that he possesses and how to use it. So I think we can get a lot out of him without having to do that military intervention directly by declaring them terrorist organizations, by seizing that money, by stopping remittances to Mexico that are to the tune of $60 billion a year. So there's a lot that President Trump understands and his crew understands they can do to get a handle on a lot of these things. And I think the government of Mexico is already preparing for that, or they would have undone some of their enforcement efforts once they found out Kamala Harris lost.

[Glenn Beck]

You know, if you ask the average person who has deported more people than any other president, maybe they would say Eisenhower. They of course, would probably say Donald Trump here soon. But the one that is way over everybody else, everybody else is in the 2,3 million kind of number. The one that is the highest at 11 million is bill Clinton. And, you know, nobody said anything about that. I didn't even. I was shocked when I read that. And I don't remember anybody saying anything about deporting, but he did it the right way and he got 11 million people out from actually physically deporting and making it so uncomfortable that they would self deport. What do you think Trump's move in policy is going to be like to deport all of these people?

[Producer]

Well, I'm going to take him at his word. I think we're looking at mass deportations because it has to be a big program. I've stood on the Mexican side of the river and watched a single group of over 2000 cross the border in one single group. I had never seen that in 32 years, never in that same area. It would have been a big deal five, six years before to see 20 people, 30 people in a group perhaps crossing. It would have created quite a stir amongst the workplace. Let's get over there and let's find these folks. 2400, it's hard to deal with. So if the removals are not going to be on a pace to match what we saw coming in, it would take decades to get this done. But I think there's, you know, we own the parole that we have granted out. We know it was for Folks that were unvetted. So there are a ton of people that are out of status right now that were released, some released with notices to report to ICE offices across the country that have disappeared. So I think no one's going to be more creative than the staff in January on how to get this done. I think they have a lot of tools. I think they need to look at the enforcement of employer sanctions provisions because if you disrupt the economy, people will stop hiring undocumented workers.

[Glenn Beck]

And if you.

[Producer]

I think they know that. Tom Holton knows that better than anybody else.

[Glenn Beck]

And if you were advising the president, what would your policy be? What would you push for, for the punishment of sanctuary cities?

[Producer]

Well, you know, I think if you look at the existing laws, you cannot harbor, you can't harbor aid a bet whether it's in a building, anybody that you have reason to believe is in the United States in violation of law. Right. So when ICE gives these detainers to these sanctuary cities for someone accused of rape that we know has already been removed, they are harboring. When they don't let the ICE agents in there to do their job and they release them on the street, so they're not only endangering their communities. I think clearly you could say that is aiding and abetting. That's harboring. When you say you can't come in this building because we don't want you to do your federal job. So I think with a Congress installed, it's a Republican. My advice is to get everybody together and harden this and make it very clear, just like everybody has pushed for how many years to prosecute January six violators take the same impetus and go against folks who fight this federal government to the letter of the law and say if you're a sheriff and you don't allow them in your county jails, if you release folks that we have told you, ICE has told you are in the country illegally, you have harbored, aided and abetted, and we've seen rogue police officers get put in jail for violating criminal statutes while on the job. Well, that should pertain to everybody. And then you've got the pocketbook. All of these states, like California, receives over $160 billion in federal assistance. Maybe not penalized students, but maybe you can turn around and say, hey, maybe some secondary education programs that the liberal universities aren't going to get money if you don't abide by federal law. It's so it's quite simple. I think they're going to be more creative than I am.

[Glenn Beck]

I hope so. I Hope so. Randy, thank you so much. I appreciate it. And thanks for all your writing at Breitbart and everything you've done in your. In your history there on the border. God bless you.

[Producer]

Thank you, Glenn. Y'all have a merry, merry Christmas.

[Glenn Beck]

You, too.

[Producer]

This is the best of the Glenn Beck program.

[Glenn Beck]

Welcome to the program and welcome to Stupid.

[Co-host]

Thank you, Glenn. Welcome. And Donald Trump went on Meet the Press this weekend.

[Glenn Beck]

Yes.

[Co-host]

This is what you're supposed to do if you're gonna be. Yeah, apparently. So we're just supposed to reflexively go to NBC News whenever those days are over. Well, I thought they were, too.

[Glenn Beck]

No, I mean, he has to do them, but. No.

[Co-host]

Well, does he? Does he have to do with them?

[Glenn Beck]

Yeah, I think he should do a little of everything. You know what I mean? I think you shouldn't just go to podcasts. You know, that's what Barack Obama did, remember? And he was, like, doing interviews with, you know, who was that woman in the bathtub? And you're like, okay, this is ridiculous. You got. You don't have to do the bathtub one. But I think you should. You should go on places where, you know, you're not. Yeah, it's adversarial. You're not going to get a good interview. I think that's required as president.

[Co-host]

I agree with that.

[Glenn Beck]

As president. Not necessarily as a.

[Co-host]

As a candidate. I think it's something you should do. I mean, I think Kamala Harris should have done an adversarial interview during the campaign at some point, which she did not do.

[Glenn Beck]

She didn't do interviews.

[Co-host]

I mean, she wasn't doing anything for a very long time. Then they switched. Switched strategies, and it did not help. In fact, it went the opposite direction. No, they really. I do wonder. There is the alternate world what that election would have looked like if she just continued to do nothing. I think it would have been closer. I think if she never did an interview, it would have been closer.

[Glenn Beck]

I think you're right on that. I think you're right. The more she spoke, incredibly, the more you were like, dear God, no, no, don't do that.

[Co-host]

Because I think they correctly realized that there were a certain amount of people who were very worried about a candidate that couldn't do an interview. And so they tried to solve that by doing interviews, and that what they should have done is just let those people go, like, realize they're not going to vote for you and hope.

[Glenn Beck]

Has anybody noticed? And I am biased because I've been talking to him off air and watching him Talk to a lot of people without cameras around. And his grasp on deep subjects has changed a great deal. Have you noticed Donald Trump in interviews is not the same guy he was in 2020?

[Co-host]

Yeah, I think that's true. He certainly seems to be more focused and has a real plan.

[Glenn Beck]

Yes. To what he's going to do.

[Co-host]

As we know it's directly Project 2025, which he commissioned, we should remember, of course. Now.

[Glenn Beck]

Yeah.

[Co-host]

No, it does seem like he. You made the description. I think it was last week, which has been sticking with me, which is after 2020, he just spent four years. Just like, this isn't gonna happen to me again. Like, I'm going to make sure these things. If I get a president, if I able to become president again, I'm not going to be hit by all of these.

[Glenn Beck]

I'm not going to be surprised ever again.

[Co-host]

Right. And it seems like he's coming in.

[Glenn Beck]

He's ready.

[Co-host]

Ready for this.

[Glenn Beck]

Yeah, he's ready. The other thing that happened to him that I think has cut down all of his slams and everything else. I mean, he still does, but you'll notice he's not as crazy on things. And I think that's.

[Co-host]

What do you mean? Look crazy on things. Like, just not as like, you know.

[Glenn Beck]

Worried about, like name calling. Okay.

[Co-host]

Yeah.

[Glenn Beck]

You know what I mean? He's not like that as much because I think he's, you know, I think it really. This is just my speculation. Put yourself in his shoes. In 2014, everybody on both sides loved him, Right. Maybe not as the president, but they loved him.

[Co-host]

He was a celebrity and he was.

[Glenn Beck]

A great guy and he's a philanthropist and he's done so much. And then he gets in and everybody that were his friends that knew him and knew what he was like, they all of a sudden turned on him. And I think that just took him by absolute surprise. And he just kept. He had to keep punching and punching and punching and punching. And I think now a couple of things have happened. One, he just stopped caring because you do care. No matter what anybody says, you do care. And he stopped caring. And then I think when he was shot, I think he found his purpose. And I also think in the following months, he kind of became cool. He became the guy who could go on Saturday Night Live and make fun of himself, you know what I mean? And everybody would accept him. He became kind of mainstream again. And so I don't think he feels like he has to punch anymore.

[Co-host]

That's interesting. Yeah. I have noticed a difference in him. I mean, I think getting shot no matter what.

[Glenn Beck]

Change.

[Co-host]

Yeah. I mean, it has to change you.

[Glenn Beck]

Right? Yeah.

[Co-host]

And so he's going into this with a real plan. And one of his. One part of his plan. This is gonna be. Clip 4 is his plan to end birthright citizenship. This is, you know, obviously highly controversial. Many people on the left do not like it at all. They asked him about it on Meet the Press with. What is it? Wexler. Christine Wexler.

[Glenn Beck]

Yes. Somebody that nobody's ever heard of because everybody you have heard of has no credibility.

[Co-host]

There you go.

[Interviewer]

You promised to end birthright citizenship on day one. Is that still your plan?

[Donald Trump]

Yeah, absolutely.

[Interviewer]

The 14th amendment, though, says that, quote, all persons born in the United States are citizens. Can you get around the 14th Amendment with an executive action change?

[Donald Trump]

We maybe have to go back to the people, but we have to end it. We're the only country that has it.

[Interviewer]

Through an executive action.

[Donald Trump]

You know, we're the only country that has it. Do you know, if somebody sets a foot of. Just a foot. One foot. You don't need to. On our land. Congratulations. You are now a citizen of the United States of America. Yes, we're going to end that because it's ridiculous.

[Interviewer]

Through executive action.

[Donald Trump]

Well, if we can. Through executive action. I was going to do it through executive action, but then we had to fix Covid first, to be honest with you. We have to end it.

[Glenn Beck]

Okay, so notice. Notice what happened. Here she comes to the 14th. Stu, tell me why the 14th amendment was first written. What is that really about?

[Co-host]

I mean, wrong to say slavery.

[Glenn Beck]

No. Slavery.

[Co-host]

Okay, yeah, it was written. You looked at me like I was gonna.

[Glenn Beck]

No, no, no, no, no. It was written for slavery. It was written because all citizens could vote and, you know, you have certain rights, blah, blah, blah. And so the Southerners, the Democrats said, well, they're not citizens. They're not citizens. They're. They're from Africa.

[Co-host]

So they can't vote.

[Glenn Beck]

Yeah, so they can't vote. Okay? If you were born here, even if you were born a slave, you're a citizen. That's what that was about. That was not about illegal immigration. Illegal immigration. Come over here, get into a hospital, have a baby, and now congratulations, everybody is a citizen, that we are the only one that has it. And the only reason we do have it is because of slavery. It was a way to make sure the Democrats didn't just cut blacks out of the vote again. That's what's so crazy. And so notice, she goes. He says, we may have to go back to the people. Can you just change that? Well, no, it's a constitutional amendment, so we may have to go back to the people. He says that first. Her immediate response is through executive action. No, I just. I just said we may have to go back to the people.

[Co-host]

There are several parts in this interview where she doesn't even. It doesn't seem like she's even listening to him. She's got this idea of what Donald Trump says in this moment, and she's like, already acted it out with her producers multiple times. So she's just not even listening.

[Glenn Beck]

Yes, and also that's why none of them have any credibility, because there's not an honest exchange. There is no honest question. He just said we may have to go. He volunteered. We may have to go back to the American people for that. So you're suggesting that maybe it would be a constitutional amendment? Well, yeah, I think we would have to do it. I might, I might. If I. If I get stuck, I might try to find a way to do it through executive action. But it is a constitutional amendment. So, yes, that's an honest conversation.

[Co-host]

Right.

[Glenn Beck]

That's not what she did.

[Co-host]

No. Do we have this clip handy again to play it again? I wanna see if you catch this one little bit in this. This is a clip for. Again, listen to her verbiage of the 14th Amendment.

[Interviewer]

You promised to end birthright citizenship on day one. Is that still your plan?

[Donald Trump]

Yeah, absolutely.

[Interviewer]

The 14th Amendment, though, says that, quote, all persons born in the United States are citizens. Can you get around the 14th amendment?

[Co-host]

Is that a quote, all persons born in the United States are citizens. That's what she said. The 14th Amendment says no.

[Glenn Beck]

Now that you asked me, I doubt it is, but I don't do. Have you looked it up?

[Co-host]

I have it.

[Glenn Beck]

Okay.

[Co-host]

All persons born or naturalized in the United States. So she leaves that out, but not necessarily important to the conversation. But the next part is, comma, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, comma, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. The whole 14th Amendment argument, and you might disagree with this part of it, is that that that phrase, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof means that illegal immigrants are not included. Now, I.

[Glenn Beck]

How. How? Well, the.

[Co-host]

They're not subject to that jurisdiction.

[Glenn Beck]

So in other words, the. Well, if mom and baby slaves would be. Right. If mom and baby were here, then they would be subject to that jurisdiction, but the family would not be because they're someplace else.

[Co-host]

I think the argument. And again, I wouldn't say. I'm an Expert on the 14th Amendment.

[Glenn Beck]

Argument here, I'm gonna tell you, but I absolutely am so far away from an expert. Right, right. Okay. That you might as well talk to a fisherman.

[Co-host]

What I have heard is people make this argument before, okay? And the argument basically is to be subject to that jurisdiction does not mean that you don't. You know, everyone, of course, has to follow the laws of a country that you, you move into. But to be subject to that jurisdiction means you have to have a basis in the country. So it's not like you just cross the border and, hey, I'm now a subject of this jurisdiction. You're a visitor. Right. Like, or in this case, a criminal crossing the border. So you would not get necessarily those protections of that 14th amendment.

[Glenn Beck]

May I just say, the only thing I hate the founders for is their use of commas.

[Co-host]

That's a good point.

[Glenn Beck]

Stop with the use of commas. Could you please, for the love of Pete. The right to keep and bear arms, comma, under a well run regulated militia, comma, shall not be infringed. Can you stop with the commas?

[Co-host]

Right.

[Glenn Beck]

It makes it too complex. Now stop with the commas.

[Co-host]

Very true. But I mean, I think regardless of what you think about the argument of the 14th Amendment and people who believe illegal immigrants would not be grandfathered into that, if it's foundational to the argument, why would you skip it?

[Glenn Beck]

Right.

[Co-host]

You have to bring that up.

[Glenn Beck]

Could you do me a favor? Do you have chatgpt or something like that? GROK or something? Type that in and ask what that means.

[Co-host]

Sure, we can see. It will take me a second, obviously.

[Glenn Beck]

Yeah, yeah. All right.

[Co-host]

Do you want to. Do you want to go onto the next clip or you want to stick?

[Glenn Beck]

Yeah, let's go to the next clip.

[Co-host]

Okay, next one is on Ukraine and what needs to happen with Ukraine. This is again, Trump on Meet the Press.

[Donald Trump]

There are people being killed in that war at levels that nobody's ever seen before. You have to go back to the Second World War. And even that, if you take a look at. And you know what it is, it's the soldiers, largely, the cities have been emptied out and demolished. The country has been demolished. If I won that election, which you know how I feel about it, I won't get into it because we don't need to start that argument. I think it's an easy argument. It was really proven even more conclusively by the win that I had on this one. But.

[Interviewer]

But you didn't answer.

[Donald Trump]

Well, that's your opinion. But I disagree with it. Had I assumed, kept control. Number one, Israel wouldn't have happened. Number two, Ukraine would have never happened. It would have never happened. Ukraine, Russia. But the number of people that are being killed, soldiers, young, beautiful soldiers, hundreds of thousands of people are being killed. And you know, it's very interesting. It's level, totally level. The battlefields totally level. You know what's happening. The only thing that stops a bullet, you know what it is, is a body, a human body. And the people that are being killed, hundreds of thousands on both sides. Russia's lost probably 500,000. Ukraine's lost higher than they say probably 400,000. You're talking about hundreds of thousands of bodies laying. All of a feels it's the stupidest thing I've ever seen and it should have never been allowed to happen. Biden should have been able to stop it.

[Glenn Beck]

Amen. He's absolutely right. And when this is over and the body count is actually revealed, and when you see. And when you see Blackrock there rebuilding, when you see all of these friends of the Bidens rebuilding, when you see Blackrock owning the farmland, then maybe we'll start to have some idea of how grotesque this really was.