Best of the Program | Guests: Stephen Moore & Hiram Sasser | 4/3/25

Summary

Podcast Summary: The Glenn Beck Program
Episode: Best of the Program | Guests: Stephen Moore & Hiram Sasser
Release Date: April 3, 2025

---

Introduction

In this episode of The Glenn Beck Program, host Glenn Beck engages in in-depth discussions with two prominent guests: Stephen Moore and Hiram Sasser. The primary focus revolves around the implementation and implications of tariffs, as well as the ongoing challenges within the U.S. judiciary system. Beck adeptly navigates these complex topics, offering his insights while eliciting expert opinions from his guests.

---

Section 1: Tariffs and American Manufacturing with Stephen Moore

Timestamp: [00:00] - [16:15]

Key Topics:

• Rationale Behind Tariffs: Glenn Beck initiates the conversation by addressing the recent move to impose tariffs, questioning their necessity and effectiveness.

• Stephen Moore's Perspective: Acknowledging his traditional stance against tariffs, Moore discusses the potential benefits and risks associated with their implementation. He emphasizes the President's authority to enact such measures, highlighting the delicate balance between economic strategy and market stability.

• Market Reactions: Moore notes the immediate negative response from the stock market, with the Dow futures plummeting and the Nasdaq experiencing a crash. He underscores the uncertainty surrounding short-term economic impacts versus long-term gains from a fairer trade environment.

• Comparative Advantage and Free Trade: Delving into economic principles, Moore explains the concept of comparative advantage, advocating for a trade system where both parties benefit by specializing in goods they produce most efficiently. He stresses the importance of maintaining America’s position as a dominant player in the global economy through free and fair trade.

• Impact on Manufacturing and Supply Chains: Moore expresses concerns from manufacturing sectors facing supply chain disruptions due to tariffs. He highlights the short-term pain endured by industries reliant on foreign materials but remains optimistic about the restoration of jobs and economic balance in the future.

Notable Quotes:

• Glenn Beck: “[...] what we need to be building now as the tariffs kick in.” [02:00]

• Stephen Moore: “If Trump can pull this off, and he may well, it would benefit everybody. We would have freer and fairer trade.” [06:00]

• Stephen Moore: “In a free trade world, we win because we have the best technology, the best workers, the best CEOs.” [11:00]

---

Section 2: Judicial Independence and Legal Challenges with Hiram Sasser

Timestamp: [16:24] - [27:20]

Key Topics:

• Judicial Tyranny: Glenn Beck transitions the discussion to the judiciary, introducing Hiram Sasser from the First Liberty Institute. The focus shifts to the rise of nationwide injunctions and the perceived overreach of district court judges.

• Systemic Issues: Sasser articulates the problems stemming from the unchecked power of district judges to issue injunctions affecting national policies. He argues that such actions undermine the separation of powers, with the judiciary overstepping its constitutional boundaries.

• Political Motives: The conversation delves into the motivations behind these judicial actions, suggesting a coordinated effort to thwart specific political agendas, particularly those of former President Trump. Sasser points out the lack of reciprocity in judicial actions against different administrations.

• Solutions and Reforms: Sasser emphasizes the need for intervention by higher judicial authorities, such as the Supreme Court, or legislative actions by Congress to curb the abuse of injunctions. He advocates for adherence to the rule of law and the proper constitutional roles of different branches of government.

• Impact on Governance: The guests discuss how the judiciary’s overreach hampers effective governance, delaying policy implementations, and creating legal uncertainties that affect national stability and administration efficiency.

Notable Quotes:

• Hiram Sasser: “This isn't about the rule of law. This is about trying to control the policy.” [20:49]

• Glenn Beck: “It is not the district court's place to stop an administrator from doing administrative work. It is the Supreme Court's place.” [21:30]

• Hiram Sasser: “When we represented Navy seals to sue the United States Navy because of the COVID vaccine mandate, we followed all the rules and won.” [25:37]

---

Section 3: Glenn Beck's Strategic Vision for America’s Future

Timestamp: [27:20] - [42:43]

Key Topics:

• Regulatory Overhaul: Beck outlines his vision for America's economic resurgence, advocating for drastic reductions in government regulations to foster competitiveness and entrepreneurial spirit.

• Modern Infrastructure Development: He emphasizes the need to build advanced infrastructures, such as chip foundries, nuclear power facilities, and resilient freight corridors. Beck argues that these projects are essential for technological sovereignty and economic security.

• Embracing the Future: Moving beyond nostalgia, Beck calls for investment in cutting-edge technologies like robotics, artificial intelligence, and sustainable energy sources. He warns against reverting to outdated manufacturing practices, urging instead the creation of jobs that align with future industrial needs.

• National Sovereignty in Technology: Beck highlights the strategic importance of domestic production of critical technologies and materials, such as rare earth minerals and microchips, to reduce dependency on foreign entities and enhance national security.

• Educational Reform: Recognizing the role of education in sustaining economic leadership, Beck and Moore discuss the imperative to reform the U.S. education system to produce a highly skilled workforce capable of driving innovation.

Notable Quotes:

• Glenn Beck: “The goal is not just to have a job. The goal is to have the capacity to survive, to compete, and to lead.” [35:00]

• Glenn Beck: “We have to stop thinking about America's future like it's a rerun of 1954.” [38:20]

• Glenn Beck: “We must create new jobs in rare earth processing and strategic mineral refining right here.” [40:15]

---

Conclusion

Throughout this episode, Glenn Beck masterfully navigates two critical issues facing contemporary America: the strategic implementation of tariffs to revive manufacturing and the urgent need to address judicial overreach undermining democratic processes. With expert insights from Stephen Moore and Hiram Sasser, the discussion underscores the necessity of bold economic policies and judicial reforms to secure America's position as a global leader. Beck's forward-thinking approach advocates for embracing technological advancements and infrastructural modernization, ensuring that the nation not only recovers but thrives in the face of evolving global challenges.

---

Final Thoughts: Listeners are encouraged to reflect on the strategic recommendations presented, considering the balance between immediate economic pain and long-term prosperity. The episode serves as a call to action for policymakers and the American public to support initiatives that foster innovation, protect constitutional governance, and build a resilient, forward-looking economy.

Transcript

[Glenn Beck]

Hey, on today's podcast, we spent a lot of time talking about tariffs, what they mean, why they're being done, is it a good idea, a bad idea? We have Stephen Moore on to talk about that. Also, what we need to be building now as the tariffs kick in. I think a really important monologue that I gave today, something I'd like to hear the president talk about, quite frankly. But what we need to be doing because the jobs, you know, from Pittsburgh, those steel plants, that, that if we're building those jobs, we're in trouble. We're in trouble. A second. Also, Hiram Sasser from First Liberty Institute. He is the executive general counsel. He and Steve Dase were on the show today to talk about what needs to be done to these judges. How do we get away from this judicial tyranny of the district court judges? They constitutionally don't have a right to do what they're doing, what needs to be done and how bad is the problem? All on today's podcast. First, let me tell you about Relief Factor. You know, I suppose if what you really want is settling to live a that is less full because you have so many aches and pains, I'm not here to stop you. You know, while you're at it, may I recommend putting a few rocks in your shoes too before you start the day and putting some wasps maybe in your underpants before you leave the house. Or if you don't like living a life of pain, try Relief Factor. Relief Factor is something that I dealt, I dealt with pain for a long time. I could not break its back. I don't know how this broke its back. I went to every doctor on the planet. I saw, you know, all the experts, everything else, and this broke the back of it, which allows me to sit here with you today because I was in so much pain. I just, I couldn't do it anymore. 1995, I've been taking it for, I think about five years now. It's less than a dollar a day. Please try their three week quick start. Doesn't work for everybody. I love this about Relief Factor. They're wide open on this. They're not making any claims. What they're saying is about 70%, 30%. You know, you're going to try it for three weeks and it may not work. 70% go on to order it month after month like I do. It's relief factor 800 for relief 1, 800 for relief. It's relieffactor.com hello America. You know, we've been fighting every single day. We Push back against the lies, the censorship, the nonsense of the mainstream media that they're trying to feed you. We work tirelessly to bring you the unfiltered truth because you deserve it. But to keep this fight going, we need you right now. Would you take a moment and rate and review the Glenn Beck podcast? Give us five stars and lead a comment, because every single review helps us break through Big Tech's algorithm to reach more Americans who need to hear the truth. This isn't a podcast. This is a movement. And you're part of it, a big part of it. So if you believe in what we're doing, you want more people to wake up, help us push this podcast to the top rate, review, share. Together, we'll make a difference. And thanks for standing with us. Now, let's get to work. You're listening to the Best of the Glenn Beck Program. Stephen Moore was in the Rose Garden yesterday for Liberation Day. He is a guy who has traditionally been against tariffs. And this was very bold yesterday, what the President did. I am nervous about it. I've had this conversation with the President. I'm not a fan of tariffs, but I think he's earned the right to. I mean, he's the President. Everybody elected him and everybody knew that tariffs were his favorite word. So he's got to do what he feels is best. It could work. It could lead to real trouble. Stephen Moore is with us now. Hi, Stephen, how are you?

[Stephen Moore]

Hi, Glenn. Good, good to be with you. I was there yesterday and I agree with your What? I agree 100% with what you just said. This could work or it could, or it could be a disaster. And I think probably in the end of the day, I think it will work. But you know, the Dow futures are down another thousand points and the nasdaq' crashing. So, you know, the market actually very negatively.

[Glenn Beck]

Does that actually matter in the short term that the Dow is down? I mean, that's the companies. You know, I know that affects Everybody's, you know, 401k and everything else. But I think people right now are more concerned with what is this going to cost me in groceries, what is this going to cost me gas? So talk to me about that level.

[Stephen Moore]

Yeah, so I mean, the market does matter because it's a kind of forward looking indicator of where the economy's headed. But you're right, mostly what people care about is what, yeah, what will this mean for gas prices and what will it mean for going to the store and groceries? And that's hard to predict. Listen, I think my Summary, and we talked about this the other day on your show, is that Trump is right, that it is not a level playing field. And it is true that these other countries have been ripping us off. And you know, I've been doing a lot of interviews, as you can imagine, over the last 24 hours on this. And, you know, especially with a lot of the foreign press like BBC and Australia News and, you know, the French news agency, and they're so indignant, you know, about, oh, my gosh, Donald Trump's causing a trade war. I'm saying, wait a minute. First of all, our tourists are one third as high as yours are, so how is it Trump's causing a trade war? I mean, you're the ones. All you have to do is play by the rules.

[Glenn Beck]

Okay, so let me ask, hang on, let me ask you that, because when he put out those charts, I was like, my gosh, how are we possibly the bad guys? But then I see on X something that said in a community note, no, that's not true. They just, they made some calculation up and that's not what we actually pay.

[Stephen Moore]

Which is true. Those numbers that the Trump administration put out were a bit exaggerated. They weren't exactly accurate. But that doesn't negate the point that I was making that they do charge a lot higher terrorists than we do. We're the freest trade nation in the world. Now, I happen to think that we benefit from that. But here's the way I see it, Glenn. If Trump can pull this off, and he may well, and he can get these other countries to do what they should do is both in terms of their own interest, but also in terms of, you know, treating the United States fairly, then it would work out really well. In other words, it would benefit everybody. We would have freer and fairer trade. And, you know, the freedom to trade is at the core of what economics is all about. If you and I trade, Glenn, and I give something to you and you give something to me, by definition, we're both better off. And so I do hope that we, I hope that outcome happens, but I'm nervous about it. I think that we're already seeing. So, for example, the, I have about six or seven manufacturing companies that are part of my institute, and they're good supporters of what I do. And they're frantic right now because they're saying, look, we, you know, we get our aluminum from Vietnam, we get our, you know, our parts from Mexico. We got, I mean, our economy is highly globally integrated, and that makes it high is the Reason we have the most efficient economy in the world. So now they're running into supply chain problems because they don't know if they can get the aluminum. They don't know if they can get the parts. You know, so the factories, you know, are only running at, say, half capacity. So there is going to be, I want to be clear about this, there will be short term pain, no doubt about it. The question is, how long will that last and when do we get to the good part where these other countries start cooperating and we create more jobs here in America?

[Glenn Beck]

Do you believe Europe when they say, fine and we're going to unleash our own war back on you? If that happens, then we're in a trade war and that's really, really bad. Do you believe.

[Stephen Moore]

I've done that for everybody. But it would be insane for the Europeans to do that because, listen, Trump, again, I said this on your show the other day, but I'll say it again. Trump is a master negotiator. You have to read his book, the Art of the Deal, by the way, I would recommend that to anybody in their 20s or 30s. You get in your career started read that book. Because Trump is so insightful in that book. And it's very simple. Glenn, if you and I are at the negotiating table and we're negotiating something and you have leverage over me, you're probably going to win that negotiation, right? And if I have leverage over you, I'm probably going to win the negotiation. United States has leverage. We are the biggest economy in the world. Every country in the world has to trade with the United States. In other words, if China couldn't trade with the United States, their economy would go into a great depression. You know, there's no way they could survive without access to America's market. Trump understands that. He's using that leverage and American power to force countries to do things they should do. Anyway. What I'm here to tell you though is, boy, this could cause some, this could cause some pain. I mean, we could, you know, people lose money in their 401s, they don't spend as much money. Factories can't get their, you know, maybe workers get laid off, maybe prices rise. So there will be a short term adjustment.

[Hiram Sasser]

Stephen, what do you, what would you think our goal is here? Because I saw the results of, you know, these tariffs being talked about. Israel came out and said we're wiping it to zero. Right. And like, for me, that's a great outcome for this policy. Yes, I would love that. But is that the Actual goal of the policy. Because if the policy is to bring jobs and manufacturing back here, if everyone wipes their tariffs to zero, which would be my preferred outcome, they're not coming, wouldn't it affect that?

[Glenn Beck]

Right.

[Hiram Sasser]

Like, what is the goal here?

[Stephen Moore]

It is. I mean, I think it's mostly to do just that so that we have a level playing field and that countries stop, quote, ripping us off, as the President would say. And that would mean we would be able to, you know, for example, our agriculture industry, you know, we are the bread and basket of the world. We have the most productive farmers. We have the most productive farmland, and we produce a lot of, a lot of wheat and a lot of corn and a lot of barley and a lot of beef and dairy products. And it is true, a lot of these countries, you know, keep that out. They won't. I mean, Canada does have very high tariffs on our, on our agricultural products. So imagine now Canada eliminates those tariffs. Guess what? We're going to have a lot more production here and our farmers are going to do a lot better.

[Glenn Beck]

Right. But they're going to pay a heavier price because then their farmers are in trouble. I mean, this is a very complex kind of situation.

[Stephen Moore]

Our power movers are much more, you know, that's the point. We are the most. In a free trade world, we win. Why? Because we have the best technology, we have the best workers, we have the best, you know, CEOs of companies. So we, we will continue to dominate the world economy in a free trade environment. And that's what Trump is saying. And there's no qu. There's no question that, you know, let me put it this very simply. You know, we, we import a lot of coffee beans from Brazil. Why? Because they have the best coffee beans. Right, Right. We sell a lot of, let's say, microchips to them. Why? Because we, they don't make microchips and we do, but they make good coffee. I mean, that's, that's the whole basis of what trade is about in countries. It's, it's called. The term for this in economics is comparative advantage. If, if you produce something really well and I produce something very well, it makes sense for not both of us to make both things. You make, you know, the apple, you grow the apples, and I grow the bananas, and then we're both better off and we trade, and that's the essence of economics. And we don't want to be Fortress America, although, you know, we could be, you know, United States is the biggest market in the world by Far and one of the things that has made America, many, many things have made America the most powerful and prosperous country in the world. But one of them. Think about this, Glenn. The United States is one gian free trade zone. You know, South Carolina can't put a tariff on North Carolina. Right. And so that, that's one of the reasons we've, you know, we are so prosperous. You know, the apples from Washington state are produced in Washington and then you know, the, the microchips are made in Texas.

[Glenn Beck]

Stephen, I was saying just a minute ago that what people have to understand is there is half of the world, western world, maybe more than half, is just managing the decline of the West. That's what they're doing. And Donald Trump is standing up and saying, no, I don't believe that. I think we need to go the 100% opposite direction. We need to reinvent ourself. And so he is shedding all of these things from the last 100 years because they have to be shed. But the, especially Europe and anybody who's in with the wef, they are saying, well, but we're never going back to a free society with, you know, the Bill of Rights and all of these things. It's gotta be a globally run managed society. And so that's the real choice here. It's not whether I pay more for my eggs or my car now, although that's the way it'll feel to a lot of people. It is actually. Is there a free and leading America in five years or do we just continue down the managed decline?

[Stephen Moore]

Look, I'm very bullish on the United States, I really am. I mean we are going to, we dominated the Internet age. You know, we created these incredible companies like Google, Amazon, Nvidia, you know, these companies that became trillion dollar companies. You know, just our magnificent seven have more market value than every single company in Europe combined. So we have so dominated technology sector. The big next thing, if I have one problem with Trump, is saying what it does, manufacturing jobs. Of course we want a manufacturing sector. We don't want manufacturing workers to lose their jobs. Of course not. But the future, Amen to lead the world next 25 years is robotics, artificial intelligence, all that thing. We have to win that war like we won. We totally dominated the Internet age in the way we did that by the way, is we deregulated, we took away the lawsuits, we took away the taxes and go at it. It was like the Wild west, remember in the early 90s when Internet was first there and we, we spawned thousands and thousands of Companies. I want to. I'm worried a little bit that Trump is looking in the rearview mirror. I'm on the board of a company, I think I may have mentioned this to you, that is that we, we build houses with robots. It's the most incredible thing, Glenn. I mean, robots build the houses and we can do it at 40% less expensive, 40% less cost, et cetera, et cetera. But, you know, what does that mean about the future of construction jobs? You know, maybe they're not going to be around because these robots are going to. So I want to make sure we're creating the jobs of the future, not the jobs of the past.

[Glenn Beck]

I have to tell you, Stephen, it's so amazing you said this. I have. I worked on something last night based on a question that Stu asked me yesterday on what, what should we be building? And I want to send this to you some of my notes for my monologue in hour three today. I'd love to get your opinion before I go on the air with it to see if I'm missing or if I'm on. On the right track, because I am exactly the same place we. If it means bringing back old jobs and we're like, Pittsburgh is going to come back with a steel industry, we're just going to build another declining Pittsburgh.

[Stephen Moore]

Exactly. Yep. And that's why we know we need to make, you know, one of the biggest problems in our country is something you and I have talked about over the years is our education system.

[Glenn Beck]

Yes.

[Stephen Moore]

If we're not producing kids that can read and do basic math, we've got Houston. We got a problem in this country. We need the most skilled, most intelligent, best equipped workers in the world and we will continue to lead. And look, I'm very, as I said, I'm bullish. Europe is still living in the 20th century.

[Glenn Beck]

Oh, yeah. Barely in the 20th century.

[Stephen Moore]

None of it worked.

[Glenn Beck]

Right.

[Stephen Moore]

I mean, Germany has been de industrialized.

[Glenn Beck]

And that is by the choice of the elites.

[Stephen Moore]

Exactly. Yeah. I mean, they thought the future was windmills. How stupid is that?

[Glenn Beck]

Well, Holland's been on that for a while, so. Stephen, great to talk to you. Thank you very much, my friend. Appreciate it.

[Stephen Moore]

Thank you.

[Glenn Beck]

Glad. Bye. Bye. Realestate agents I trust.com is our sponsor. If you're about to buy your very first home, maybe you're upgrading to a bigger space, maybe you're downsizing. I don't know, you're just moving into a house that is an exact replica of the one you live in now. For some reason you want to do that. Whatever the case is, one thing will remain the same no matter what. The whole process is going to be challenging. It is hard, especially in an economy like today. Buying or selling a house involves a ton of work that has to be done correctly. And when I say work, I mean everything from paperwork to the actual physical labor, everything in between. It's a whole lot of plates that you have to keep spinning all at the same time. And then you have to pack those plates up. That's why you need the best real estate agent you can get. And my company, realestate agentsitrust.com has you covered. We will pair you with the best agent in your area, somebody who knows the best practices, somebody who knows your area, somebody kind of man or woman that you can trust on a handshake deal and that they listen to you so they're, they're actually searching for what you're looking for. Realestate agents I trust.com go to real estate agentsitrust.com realestate agentsitrust.com go there now. Now back to the podcast. This is the best of the Glenn Beck program, and we really want to thank you for listening. Hiram Sasser is with us. First Liberty Institute, executive general counsel on the Judiciary. Last night I showed you some of the names and organizations that are funding this judicial coup against Trump, and that is exactly what it is. And it is well orchestrated, well planned and well funded. And what do we do about it? Hiram, welcome to the program.

[Hiram Sasser]

Hey, thanks for having me.

[Glenn Beck]

You bet. So last night I kind of went through these, and it is sickening to see how well planned this is. And it has nothing to do with anything other than thwarting Donald Trump and his agenda. It doesn't have anything to do with the actual law or, or anything else. These are the same people that were planning for his impeachment before he took president the first time.

[Hiram Sasser]

You know what I always find amazing is that everybody thinks that this is like a practice, right? Like we get to run our plays and there's no opponent going to be on the other side.

[Glenn Beck]

Right.

[Hiram Sasser]

I mean, there's, there's a team on the other side. They're very smart and they're well organized and they, and they work really hard for the things that they, that they believe in. And so we have to work doubly hard. Look, the nationwide injunction thing has really gotten out of control. I mean, in the 20th century, it sort of kind of emerged. In the 60s, you'd have a few here and there. I think a couple against President Reagan, a few against President Clinton.

[Glenn Beck]

By this time in Biden's administration, there were only three. There's like 159 now.

[Hiram Sasser]

Well, that's right. Well, look, they've really ramped up the cost. What's fascinating, by the way, Glenn, is that the left complained about nationwide injunctions when they were applied, when, you know, all, like, you know, basically 14 of them were applied to the Biden administration. There's a lot of what people don't understand, really, is that there's only two. There's only two institutions that can fix this problem of nationwide injunctions. Either the Supreme Court's gonna have to put an end to it, which they can, or Congress is gonna have to put an end to it, which they can. But there's no way, really, from a legal standpoint, to stop until we get to one of those. One of those two inflection points. But what I think is very, very critical is that if you would look like. You look at Judge Katz Marek, for example, when he joined the FDA's approval of abortion drugs, one of the things that he did was he actually halted his order for a week to allow for an emergency appeal by the United States, like what Judge Boasberg was doing, you know, turning. Turn the planes around. I mean, that's just. That's. That's beyond the pale. Even with the power to issue a nationwide injunction, a district court judge should give the government the opportunity to do an emergency appeal in order to be able to have somebody else grade their papers. And unfortunately, this isn't about the rule of law. This is about trying to control the policy. And that's the big problem, right?

[Glenn Beck]

I mean, when the left cheered, when Joe Biden, he didn't just go against the district Court, he went against the Supreme Court and said, well, they told me I couldn't spend this money, which is clearly unconstitutional. And, you know, we're just gonna give all these refunds and pay all these people's school. School bills. He couldn't do that. And then when the Supreme Court came out, he said, I just gotta find another way to do it. He did it over and over and over again. I don't have a problem if you are violating the Constitution, if President Trump is violating the Constitution, that is the Supreme Court's job to say, hang on, you can't do that. It is not the district court's place to stop an administrator from doing administrative work. It is the Supreme Court's place. And, I mean, I suppose you, as a district judge, could get involved. I Don't think you should, at least at this kind of level that they are, you know. No, no District court said, hey, you got to turn the Enola Gay around. No, the president, that's his responsibility to do that. Not court. Congress. Yes. Not a court. How far out of control is all of this? Just to put it into perspective for the average person.

[Hiram Sasser]

Well, look, what's, what's going on is that you have one, one judge issuing an injunction against the entire United States government. That, that is embodied in the power of one man. The only person who's elected by the entire nation and the entire executive branch is housed in one person. And the people that that person decides to employ in order to, in order to effectuate policy. Then you have this one district court judge not elected by anybody.

[Glenn Beck]

Right.

[Hiram Sasser]

Who's telling that person what to do? Look, the, what really needs to happen is the Supreme Court needs to put a clamp on this. And at the very least, all these decisions, they need to be put on ice until they go to the US Supreme Court for the final resolution. Now, if the court says, hey, I agree with that judge, that's fine. That's the Supreme Court, then Congress can step in and fix it. But that's the real. That's where the rubber meets the road, is that you're. And the left, remember, they complained, remember, during the Biden administration, it's all about form shopping. Do you remember all the.

[Glenn Beck]

About form shopping remind people.

[Hiram Sasser]

Yeah, look, all they, all the left complain about as well. You know, anytime anyone wants to sue the Biden administration, you know, they go to Texas, you know, and, and they go find some district court judge in Texas. Well, I've noticed that. I've noticed that none of the people on the left are suing the Trump administration. They're not filing their cases in Texas. Right. They're going to find. They're going to go find their judges. And here's the fascinating part. You remember all those attacks on judges. I mean, Judge Katzmark in Amarillo had a billboard just outside his neighborhood to remind his kids of what a horrible person he is.

[Glenn Beck]

All right?

[Hiram Sasser]

And we don't. You don't see the federal. I never saw the Federal Judges association issue a statement defending the judicial independence of Judge Katz Merrick. And that's why Judge Ho actually resigned recently from the fiscal. He's around the Fifth Circuit. Judge Ho resigned from the Federal Judges association because he didn't. He basically couldn't stand. What he said was he couldn't stand the hypocrisy of what was going on with. With the fact that they now issued a statement trying to defend the independence of the judiciary because of, you know, all this rhetoric about these judges are, you know, that that's a threat to judicial independence. The hypocrisy runs thick here. The left is against injunctions until they're for them. They're against judicial independence until they need it. They are constantly switching sides just because it's a fight about power and whatever gives them the power. So, look, bottom line is this. It's up to Congress. There's a bill in front of Congress. They're debating it now, hopefully that they can address nationwide injunctions. Look, one last thing I'll say, Glenn, is this. When we represented Navy seals to sue the United States Navy because of the COVID vaccine mandate, violating their religious. Their religious objections to the. To taking the vaccine. We had Navy seals. We didn't do a nationwide injunction at First Liberty. We actually did the right thing. We filed a class action lawsuit. We followed all the rules of filing a class action lawsuit, and that's. And that's how we were able to win and we defeated the Navy. There is a way to do this right. Getting rid of nationwide injunctions is not going to. It's not going to hamstring anybody. Everybody can do it the way we did it at First Liberty and still win.

[Glenn Beck]

Yeah. I tell you, it's. But it's. You know, and I know it's not about winning. This is just about destruction. This is just about hobbling this administration so we can't get anything done, and they'll just keep moving on from one another. They've already planned, like, I think, like, another hundred lawsuits by the end of the year. He hasn't done anything yet. And. And they've already, like, yeah, you know, wait until you see what's coming next fall. How did. What. What. What are you talking about? How are you planning all these lawsuits in advance?

[Hiram Sasser]

Well, it. It will. It look, it's called lawfare. This is. The left has always been. Has always been better at it. Have you noticed? You know, you know, they always have to. Now they have to attack that. The left has to attack the Supreme Court. You know, we had to come out in great defense of judicial independence. You know, the left loves judicial independence for their dispute court judges, but they never talk about it for the Supreme Court. They don't mind the protesters outside Justice Kavanaugh's house, you know, with his daughters, like, looking out the window to see people, like, chanting, you know, death to their dad. Right. Like the left doesn't care about the attacks in the Supreme Court. Why? Because they don't feel like that those are. That they own that court anymore. But if you go back in time when, when the left had a, had a stranglehold on the U.S. supreme Court years, oh, the American Bar association, the ACLU, all they ever talked about was judicial independence. All they ever talked about was defending the judiciary. Look, it's not about principle for the left. It's just about power. And on our side, we have, we have fought principally and with principles in order to try to advance the missions that we want to advance in court. And it's time that the Supreme Court put a clamp down on some of the nonsense or Congress. But one of those two are going to have to do it.

[Glenn Beck]

Hyrum. Thank you so much. Hyrum Sasser. He is the first Liberty Institute Executive General Counsel. You can find their website and Support them first liberty.org or on X at First Liberty. This is the best of the Glenn Beck program. All right? There are, there are three things that I want the President of the United States to stand hard on right now. If I, if I were, if I had his ear and I was like, okay, Mr. President, here's what you do. He'd look at me like, what the hell, Glenn? You think I'm gonna listen to you? But let me give him some advice anyway. I want the President to hammer three things first today. I would urge him to take an ax to the regulations today in breathtaking ways. That's, that's number one. I, I want him to show up actually with an ax and say, I am going to cut regulations so we make this country more competitive. No need for this government to get into your way of your dreams. The states want to do. That's fine. You know, if you're obviously going to pump poison into the, you know, into the rivers and everything else, then we're going to get involved in that pump. But no more of this overregulation. And I'm cutting them today in breathtaking ways. And then I want him to shame the Congress. You know, Congress is going out on like a three week vacation now. I don't, I mean, must be nice, guys. Uh, wow, insider trading and unlimited vacations. It seems at some point they're gonna come back and they're gonna make those tax cuts that we got eight years ago permanent. That's not what we voted for. We didn't vote for that. We voted for significant tax cuts. We want you to reduce the deficit. We want you to give us significant tax cuts. We want you to get out of our way. And Donald Trump said the last thing we have to do is raise tariffs. Well, he raised tariffs yesterday. Congress, shame on you. Be bold. See the times that we're in, we're in bold times. Do you have any courage to be bold at all? Okay, so he raised the tariffs. And what everybody is saying is great. This is going to bring back American manufacturing. That incent instinct is right. We have to bring jobs back to America. We have outsourced way too much. We've hollowed out our middle class, and all we are now is on a, on unmanaged decline. That's really what the course is, managed decline. Donald Trump is trying to flip that. We have made ourselves so vulnerable to foreign supply chains. You know, that at best, you know, they don't care about us. At worst, some of these foreign supply chain provider, I mean, they want to destroy us. So what are we doing? So here's the truth. If all we have to do is chase the old jobs, we're going to end up building the ghost towns of opportunity for tomorrow. You just, you can't do it because the, the factories with lights on but no people on inside, that's, that's coming, okay? This time when the factories come back, they're not bringing back the same jobs. They're going to be done by robotics, sensors, AI systems. And if we don't think bigger and broader and bolder, we are going to miss the opportunity to build the nation that doesn't just survive. It's the nation that leads. We have to stop thinking about America's future like it's a rerun of 1954. It's not. GM's not coming back. The big factories aren't coming back like that. And the goal is never to return to the past. Do you think in 1954 they were like, ah, man, if we could just have those big factories, you know, milling those cotton. No, they weren't thinking like a hundred years ago. Why are we. The goal is not to return to the past. The goal is to build what the world needs tomorrow and make sure we're the ones that are controlling it. So when we talk about bringing jobs back, what are the jobs we should be looking for? What do we build? Well, first of all, we build chip foundries. Okay? Not one, not two, dozens of them all over the country. Dozens of chip factories. Because every single car, every missile, every drone, every phone, every satellite, every AI model depends on those chips. We must control the chips right now. The Majority of high end chips come from Taiwan, which is a hundred miles off the coast of a very aggressive and unstable China. Do you think if things get tough, we're going to have, we're, we're going to have access to those chips and we can't just have Taiwan come in and say, oh, we're going to build one factory here. No. Dozens of those factories, redundancy, you know, having everything coming from Taiwan, that's not a supply chain, that's a hostage situation ready to happen. We need to bring the entire chip ecosystem home. That means the raw materials, the design, the fabrication, the packaging, the protection. That's sovereignty. That's bringing America into the future. Not back to 1954. Another thing, and I wouldn't mind going back to 1954 on this one because we at least got this one right. We need to build nuclear power, period. And not the cranking, you know, the creaking concrete dinosaurs of the Cold War. We need to build small modular reactors. We have them now. AI optimized grid systems, next generation thorium designs that are faster, that are cheaper, that are cleaner, that are safer. Why do we need them? Because of the data centers. These data centers are going to eat up so much of our electricity. If you don't build these things now and you want to stay competitive with AI as a nation, you're going to be having brownouts because the data centers are going to need them. So if we are ahead in AI but we didn't build enough electricity, you're going to be living in brownouts. That's not a good idea. That's not how we lead. If you want to run the data centers, the factories, the server farms, the electric vehicles, all without choking our air and all without depending on any foreign oil. Nuclear is not an option. It's the foundation. And if we would, if we would pursue this new technology. It's already here. If our government would help by just deregulating. Not the crazy stuff. Well, actually deregulating the crazy stuff. Not the protections against the crazy stuff. Make sure these things are safe, but build them then serve server farms. I don't want the government building a single server farm. Not one. But I do want the government and this would create a lot of jobs to build data fortresses, okay? Server farms, domestic cloud infrastructure. Let the private sector fill the buildings with the latest and the greatest. Let them carry all the risk. Let them, oh gee, is something brand new. We got to get rid of all that. Good, they carry all of that. But, but perhaps it is the government's job to build a fortress around those centers to protect it. That's where the real money can come in. And businesses will say I want because they're protecting it. It's safe here. The backbone of every single AI model, every defense system, every modern company. It's all going to be on data, period. Did and we're hosting far too much of it right now on foreign owned systems or in single points of failure. Not a good idea. We need hardened distributed secure computing across the country. Our future should not be held together by luck, some band aids and third party logins. What are we doing? So forget about building, you know, the new GM plant of the future. These are the things that we should be focused on. We need to build robotics hardware. Because while AI is the brain, robotics is the body. And whoever builds the controls, whoever builds the body, controls the labor of the future. Okay? Cause it's not gonna be you working on an assembly line. It will be a robot. China is pouring billions of dollars into robot manufacturing. If they control the means of automated production, they control the next industrial revolution. Have you seen their docs compared to our docs? We're not doing anything because of all of our labor unions. China doesn't care about the labor unions. Okay, I don't think that's a good thing. I don't like China's model. But if we don't understand that they will put us out of business. If we don't adapt to what is happening, we are going to be left in the dust. All of this stuff is not worth anything. All the pain that you will be feeling at the grocery store and everything else. All of the arguing, all the fighting that we have done to try to save our country is over in the next five years. If we're not understanding what I'm saying to you right now. We cannot allow China to lead in in AI or automation, from agricultural bots to surgical systems. It has to be led by us. We also need to create new jobs in rare earth processing and strategic mineral refining right here. We have to do it, even if it costs us more for a while. These are the jobs that must be brought to America. We must create them. Finding the mining, the refinery of our own rare earth minerals because you can't build a single solar panel, you can't build an electric motor, a wind turbine, a guidance system without these materials because you can't build the chips. And right now China controls about 90% of all of the global refinery. We dig the ore here and then we send it to them. That's not just bad policy, that's national suicide. What are you doing? We need to mine smarter, refine, cleaner and stockpile strategically. We need to build next generation alloys and materials because very soon AI is going to start discovering new substances that we never would have thought of. It's going to look at the periodic tables and it's going to say why are you using, using steel? You want to build a steel plant, why? Take this, this, this, combine it in this way and it's going to make something that's twice as light and three times as strong. Stronger than carbon fiber, heat resistant, self healing, all of that stuff is coming. These are going to change the way we build planes, buildings, armor, spacecraft, maybe even the way we heal the body. Profound change is here before 2030. We should not be watching any of this from the sidelines. The United States of America needs to lead it if we are going to be have another great renaissance and have you know what Donald Trump says, this new golden age. We have to be leading this stuff. We have to be building biomanufacturing domestic pharmaceutical productions. You know, the next war may not be fought with bullets, it might just be fought with a virus, antibiotics, hormones, vaccines. 90% of our active pharmaceutical ingredients still come from China and India. That's madness. That's a chokehold. We need redundancy, we need it here, we need it now. We need to build vertical farms, regenerative agriculture, AI powered food networks. You can't eat patriotism. I want the farms to survive. I want American domestic products here. But we have to see what's over the horizon and start building those jobs. It would be like if I'm saying, you know what farmers, we're going to bring back the jobs of the farm of the old days and I send you a horse and a plow to strap. You wouldn't want that. We must think differently. You know, in a crisis if all of our, our ports are down, our shelves are empty in days, we need cities to grow their own food farms that rebuild the soil systems that ensure that every American can eat. And a quick reminder here, you know, with, with very few exceptions here, when I say we need to build, I don't mean the government. With very few exceptions like defense, the private market does all of this. What the government can do is reduce our taxes, reduce the taxes on builders and entrepreneurs, reduce the regulations, help us help you. I don't care what's happening on the other side of the globe. I don't. We need to build freight infrastructure, we need to build corridors that let us move our supplies and our, our goods across the country without ever having to touch a foreign port. And we don't need better roads. My gosh, how many times do we have to pay? We need more resilient roads. Do you know, some of the concrete, some of the things that are being produced now in other countries that we're so far behind on. And yes, maybe we build a steel mill from time to time, but not the ones we remember. We build automated modular, ultra clean micro mills that forge the next generation of steel in smaller batches closer to where it's needed. Because the future is not about bulk. It's about agility. It's about speed. It's about precision. That is the new industrial revolution. The question isn't will America bring jobs back? The question is, will America build what the future depends on? If we get stuck in this trying to resurrect the past, we're going to be outpaced by nations that are inventing right now. They're inventing what's next. Tariffs are just a tool, a lever, but they're not vision. We need to think like builders again, like pioneers, like people who understand that the goal is not just to have a job. The goal is to have the capacity to survive, to compete and to lead. Let's build what matters. Not nostalgia, not for headlines, but because the future can't wait. And if we're not leading that, if we're not shaping the future, believe me, someone else will. I want us to do it.

[Unknown]

American Giant makes great clothing. Sweatshirts, jeans, and more right here in the U.S. visit american-giant.com and get 20% off your first order with code STAPLE 2020. That's 20% off your first order at american giant.com code STAPLE20.