Stu Burguiere (2:45)

All right. Hello, Stu.

Glenn Beck (2:46)

How are you, Glenn? How are you in dc?

Stu Burguiere (2:49)

I am good. I tell you, the, the allergies, the, the trees and everything is just. They exploded in my throat yesterday and so I'm not sure how long my voice will last. And I have to save it because I'm meeting with the President a little later on this afternoon and go spend a couple of hours with him. And that show will broadcast tonight at 9:00pm on Blaze. So just stick with me. All right, let me. Let's start here with potus. I mean, with scotus. The battle for the kid, the soul of our children began yesterday in the Supreme Court. The case involves a group of parents suing the largest school district in Maryland for their white right to withdraw their children from classes on days that books with gay and transgender characters themes are discussed. The parents are suing on religious freedom grounds. In 2022, Montgomery County Public Schools added LGBTQ themed books to their curriculum for students from pre K through the fifth grade. The books include things like Pride Puppy, an Alphabet book about a family whose puppy gets lost at a pride parade. Love and Violet, about a girl who has a crush on her female classmate. These are Pre K to 5th grade and born Ready, about a transgender boy. Again, these books added to pre K to fifth grade. This new curriculum is DEI for elementary children. Now, at first, the Maryland School District allowed or alerted parents when the storybooks were going to be used in class and allowed them to have their children excused from the sessions. But the district has since stopped giving both advance notice and an opt out policy, saying it's too hard to administer. I mean, she's. It's really, really. And it leads to lots of absences and stigmatizes some kids, huh? I want you to know this case is not about a few storybooks, a few colorful, you know, pictures of little puppies getting lost. It's about whether you as a parent still have a God given right to raise your children according to your faith and your values and your common sense. Do you have the right? Because if the Supreme Court says no, you don't have that right anymore. If the First Amendment free exercise clause doesn't protect this, your right as a parent, then what, what is, what is, what are all our rights even for if we don't have a right as a Parent to parent our children. None of the rights really even matter. Now. The parents who are suing insist that these books, quote, promote one sided transgender ideology, encourage gender transitioning, and focus excessive excess on romantic infatuation. By the way, the parents are not seeking to remove the books from classrooms or the children's libraries. They just don't want their children to have to sit through these indoctrination sessions. Oh, that's not good enough. You will comply. That's what it's all about. They're not trying to erase anyone's story. They just want to not comply. They want to shield their children from ideas that contradict their faith. What is the first Amendment really all about? Sounds reasonable. Sounds like basic parenting 101. First amendment is clear. You cannot burden someone's free exercise of religion. Forcing kids to engage with ideas that violate their family's deeply held beliefs, that is clearly, clearly a burden. Religious liberty is in the first Amendment. It is not a second class right. It is a first class right. Besides, this is basic common sense, or at least used to be. Parents have the right to guide their kids on any sensitive topic like sex, sexuality, or yes, even gender. It's not the school's job. It's your job, period. Now this should be a slam dunk for the parents. But I don't even know. I mean, if the Supreme Court doesn't see that, parents won't just be losing this case, we'll be losing even more freedom to raise our own kids. This one is a very, very deep red crimson line in the sand that the Supreme Court cannot cross. But we'll see. Apparently. Yesterday, did you hear any of the arguments, Stu?

Glenn Beck (7:33)

Yeah, I read about them. It definitely seemed like the conservative justices were a bit skeptical of the idea that you get to force parents to keep their kids in these classes, even if they oppose it when you're reading these books. But of course, you never know. We've seen crazy things happen in the Supreme Court before. What's fascinating to me is. And what's the motivation here, Glenn? You tell me. If you're going to have one of these situations where you have these books and as you point out, they are not like, okay, there happens to be a gay character in a book about something else. It is straight out books about why you should think these lifestyles and choices are okay. It is straight out what they're doing to pre K to fifth year fifth graders.

Stu Burguiere (8:26)

So really, really young.

Glenn Beck (8:27)

This is not like, you know, some of these situations they like to push out there, like, oh, you don't want high schoolers to read these books. It's not even what they're talking about. And what could be the motivation of not allowing parents to opt their kids out here? They did offer that, as you noted. They did offer that the first year that these books.

Stu Burguiere (8:49)

It's a hassle.

Glenn Beck (8:49)

It's a hassle. I love that. There's no innocuous. There's no innocuous explanation for this.

Jeff Fisher (8:56)

Right.

Glenn Beck (8:57)

It's just we want your kids to believe these things, therefore, we will force them to stay in class. What do you mean it's hard to administer? There's all sorts of things that would allow. That you'd allow kids to leave class for. It's not hard to administer a kid walking out and doing something else, learning something different. What's the motivation? What's the innocuous tale here, Glenn?

Stu Burguiere (9:23)

There is none. There is none. You. You go back to the Bible, Remember Sodom and Gomorrah and, you know, the angels coming to town, they're looking just for one person. Just what can we find one person. And they go in and they find one. They find one. And he sees the angels and he's like, come on, come on, get into the house. Get into the house. And he gets them into the house and you know, like, you're not safe out there. And then they start beating on the door, hey, let us in. We saw these two guys. We saw these two guys, and you need to. You need to bring them out here. The answer was no, no, no. I tell you, I'll give you my daughter, just not these guys. Now, I found that a little, you know, that's when the angel should have went. I don't know if we found the right guy here, but it was a different time. We'll give you our daughter first. Give you our daughter. Just leave them alone. No, no. You had to comply. If you were coming in to the city, you must comply. They wanted to sodomize the angels. No, thank you. No, you know, I'm all sodomy. I'm all live. The doctor says I'm getting too much sodomy. So. But that is what's happening again, Even if you don't believe in angels or you don't believe in the story of the Bible, this is a very good parable. I happen to believe it, but it's a very good parable on what was going on. Let's just look at the Bible as just saying what was a general thing. You could describe it any way you want, but what was generally going on the city had been taken over by just absolute degenerates and sodomy had become such a big deal. You know, they actually taught my daughter in a Catholic school at Fordham University. They taught my daughter that sodomy. Sodomy, dad, was just their way of greeting people. You had a Catholic school teach you that. That sodomy wasn't bad. It was just the way they greeted people. Hey, drop your pants. I want to greet you. That's ridiculous. Absolutely ridiculous. But that's just the way it was. Well, you know what? I don't want to live in a city where they drop their pants to greet you. I just don't. I think that's probably wrong.

Glenn Beck (11:49)

Speak for yourself.

Stu Burguiere (11:50)

You know, even if that was even.

Glenn Beck (11:52)

Lots of people, Glenn, you have to understand you can't opt out of it. You need to make sure that you're. You're participating in the traditional greetings of that society.

Stu Burguiere (12:04)

This is a philosophy that has no forgiveness and you're either on board or you're not. You're either 100% in or you're an outcast and you will comply. This is what the left just doesn't understand. I shouldn't say the left understands this. The average Democrat doesn't understand. They think. Because the average Democrat, I think, is still kind of thinking, well, you know, I mean, I don't like all of that, but I want to be tolerant. There is no tolerance with this. There's none. And this should show you there is no reason to force these parents or force these kids to go against their parents teaching. Other than you will participate, you will comply. That's all it is.

Glenn Beck (12:56)

Yeah, I love too. One of their outs on this from the left is basically to say, look, if you don't want your kids to learn this stuff, then you should homeschool or put your kids in Christian schools. Now, of course, it's actually Christians, Jews and Muslims. One of the lead defendants here is a Muslim, actually is trying to pull their kids out of this. And they have, which is a fascinating argument from the left considering how hard they fought against school choice all this time. I mean, they have tried to prevent it. They've tried to prevent the rights for you to educate your own kids. And they're trying to force you to pay for that education not once, but twice. That's their answer. Like, if you don't want to learn what we're teaching you, then you get to pay twice as much for an education you're going to get outside of these walls.

Stu Burguiere (13:49)

I will tell you That I talked to some people over the last couple of days up here, some of them with the Department of Education, and they are thrilled to dismantle that thing. They are very, very excited to dismantle the Department of Education. They're on the inside and they're like, it's freaking them out, and it is. We're shutting this thing down. And it couldn't be more exhilarating, quite honestly. I mean, tell me what the Department of Education has done. Look at how they are. They're taking on private schools and they're saying, you don't have a right to private education or you have a right. But we're not gonna. We're not gonna give you any vouchers. We're not gonna spend any. And look at what we're spending money on. A system that is getting worse and worse and worse, and we're trapping our children into. Into slavery. If your kids can't read, I mean, go back to the 1800s. Do you know that it was, I believe it was the death penalty to teach someone, a slave, how to read? Did you know that it was a crime of the highest order to teach a slave to read? Why? Because if they can read, they can think. If they can think, they are no longer going to be a slave. That is why. So this progressive. These people have hated. Have hated the African American forever. It's the same people that started the Klan. It's the progressive movement that tried to wipe out every black with Planned Parenthood, and they're still doing it and getting away with it. Is there a reason why all of the abortion clinics happen to fall in the black zip codes? Is there a reason that that's where most of them are? Gee, I don't know. They're still doing it. They were the ones that were over in Germany telling you how to get rid of the Jews. Yes, that was an American thing, not a German thing. That was us. My gosh, these people have hated and hated and hated. And then the guy Johnson, who stopped the civil rights movement, he stopped the Civil Rights act in 1959. He was the guy who stopped it. Then just four or five years later, he signs it in and he's proud to do it. And then he signs the. The. The great. What do you call it? The Great Society bills. So we have a Great Society that's going to help the black man. And what does it do? It tears their families apart. It drives them further into poverty. It miseducates their children. So they're just nincompoops and Then, by the way, white people are nincompoops as well because we get the same damn education. Who is this hurt? This has hurt the black man more than the white man. And these people, they still get away with it. Now ask yourself a question. If you're paying taxes and this is your country, why the hell can't you say, I'm not educating my kid there and I'm not paying you for that education? Because I think that education is evil. I think that education is so evil because look what it's doing to our kids. It's teaching them that they should be slaves. It's not teaching them how to think. It's teaching them what you want them to think. No. Not going to do it anymore. All right, back in just a second. You never realize how dependent you really are on the power that's supplied by the grid until the grid is down. That's when the thought hits, Wow, I should have had a generator. Mm. That's why I want you to check out the grid Dr. 3300. Generators are really, really expensive, but you usually don't need one. But this one is solar powered, so you're not scrambling for gas cans or dealing with a roar of an engine in your driveway. It's quiet, it's clean, it's safe to use inside your house, even. This is the generator for people who want something practical, portable, and built for a world we actually live in where blackouts are more common and infrastructure is more powerful. This is something you could put your fridge or your freezer on so you know all the meat doesn't go bad. If you want real peace of mind, something you'll actually use, go to my patriotsupply.com. look at the grid Dr. 3300. You'll be glad you did. It's quiet, fume free, safe to use indoors and out, totally portable. And in a world where the grid's becoming less and less reliable by the day. Grid Dr. 3300 will give you peace of mind and practical everyday use. Get yours now, my patriotsupply.com. that's my patriotsupply.com America's trusted source for emergency preparedness. Now back to the podcast. This is the best of the Glenn Beck Program. All right. Hello, Stu. Welcome to the program.

Glenn Beck (18:45)

Thanks, Glenn. Big day today.

Stu Burguiere (18:47)

Yeah, big day.

Glenn Beck (18:49)

You got, of course, interview with the President of the United States, going to be airing tonight on BlazeTV. Blazetv.com Glenn, by the way, promo code. Glenn, if you'd like to join BlazeTV and save 20 bucks, do you have kind of an approach here at this point. Do you know what you're going to ask him?

Stu Burguiere (19:09)

No. I mean, I do. I've got pages and pages of questions and notes. But now I have to, you know, it's going to take me an hour or two just to whittle it down to the questions I think I can get in. You know, I've got, I don't know, 45 minutes or an hour with the President. And that's from the moment he walks in to the moment he leaves. So you don't have a lot of time. And you know, every, every single word counts. I know I'm gonna start with this. I asked just for a list of the things that he accomplished in the first 100 days. And we got to page 89. I'll have all of them tonight. This is the first 80, I think 89 days. Look at that. That a lot. That's just a list of the accomplishments of the first 89 days. That's. What would you say? That four inches thick? I mean, this guy has made more progress than any other president or many presidents combined in the first 100 days. Nobody's done what, what he's done. But you know, one of the things, and I don't know how I'm going to, because I can't ask him directly. So I kind of try to ask him several questions all the way through that'll kind of give you a sense of are we looking for a reprieve? Is that where we're going to get a four year reprieve if the economy doesn't turn around fast enough? Because I believe the President can turn it around. But if it doesn't turn it around fast enough or if people don't understand that he is changing the entire structure of the world and he's trying to do it in two years, really we're going to be left with a reprieve and not a fundamental change. And does he think that's really possible, especially without Congress? I mean, I'm going to rail on Congress. I don't know if he'll join me on that. But I really want to know why he isn't pounding Congress into the dirt. I mean, Congress is, they're not helpful at all. And any, no matter what anybody says, I've talked to enough people just the last few days here to tell you that anybody who tells you that the Senate and the House leadership is on the President's side, they have, they don't know their butt from their elbow. They have no idea what they're talking about, they are not on his side, they are not working with him. Um, and that's obvious. I mean, they should be passing. You know, I know this is going to be, you know, he said, I'm going to pass a, the largest tax cut. Well, he's not, he's. What the Congress is doing is, is he's actually, he's thwarting the largest tax increase in American history that would come next year. Well, the country needs a tax cut, a tax plan that will actually encourage spending on business, encourage, you know, spending on, on creating jobs. I also want to talk to him about energy. I mean, what do you, what do you think, Stu? What are the questions you want to know?

Glenn Beck (22:15)

I think the economy is a big one and how he's going to go forward with that. We talked about having that positive agenda. I think that would be helpful. Seems like the markets are liking that today. There's maybe a little bit of an approach change over the past couple of days and that seems to be helping quite a bit. I think that's a big one. I think certainly energy is a big one. Department of Education is another one.

Stu Burguiere (22:39)

Wait, wait, wait. Go back to the positive. What do you mean by that? Like we talked about energy going in and saying, look, I'm going to build all these nuclear power plants in the next three years. Because testimony on the Hill yesterday, day before yesterday from the president of, you know, former CEO of Google, Eric Schmidt, was pretty clear. We are going to right now, the cloud services, if you will, the compute power for all of the big, you know, computer cloud servers, they require currently 3% of all of the electricity that is used in the United States. 3%. In three years, they will require 99% of our energy. Well, there's no way that can happen without us having blackouts and brownouts and, you know, the rest of the country just starving itself from electricity. That'll just collapse everything. So a positive way to deal with this is to say, I am going to do the biggest energy push ever in American history. And he's already done it for oil and coal. Now he just needs to say, I'm cutting the red tape. I'm going to make sure that they're safe. But there's new technology now with, with nuclear power plants and we're going to drop them in city after city after city where there's cloud servers are going to be. Because if Eric Schmidt is right, and I believe he is, each one of these cloud servers by 2030 will need a nuclear full size nuclear power Plant themselves. That's incredible.

Glenn Beck (24:23)

Incomprehensible. But, yeah, as you point out, instead of saying, like, an alternate approach to that would be, hey, we need to stop these AI companies from doing this. We need to make sure that they are not taking over. That's the. I would say what the left would typically do in a situation like this. They would try to stop the companies from growing. They would try to stop them from innovating. They would say, you need to do more with less. And I think the conservative argument there is to say, hey, we're going to give you the tools that you need. We're going to make it easy for these companies to build nuclear power plants in a safe way, of course, but reliable energy that can fuel these things would be great. I think the same thing. I think if you look at Trump's economic plan, he wants to bring, let's say, manufacturing back to the United States. Well, there's a couple ways that you can do that, and both of them are completely consistent with what Trump wants to do. One of them is obviously tariffs. That's what's had almost all the attention. I think there's a reason why the media focuses on that. I think they rather talk about the tariffs because they're not as popular. The other side of it is incentivizing companies to come here. It's cutting regulation, it's cutting taxes. It's making the United States into the greatest place to do business. People will want to come here. And the Democrats have worked really hard to take that impression away from the world over the past 20 years. And Trump, I think, in his first term did a good job at encouraging that sort of development here. I think it went pretty well with the economy. And I think, like, that just. It's just a. I think he believes that still. He just. It hasn't been the focus as much of the messaging, and I think that could help.

Stu Burguiere (26:02)

This is the problem, and I'm gonna try to get him to explain this. I can't ask him. I don't think I can ask him directly, because the president, if you say, look, how much trouble are we in? You know, and is this fixable? Of course he's going to say, yeah, it's absolutely fixable. But he needs to articulate or somebody needs to articulate how close to the edge of the abyss we are. I mean, you know, Stu, you know, I have. I've talked about this economic stuff over and over again. I had a conversation with somebody who. I can't say who, but they believe me. They Absolutely know what's happening with our dollar and the economy and everything else. Okay. Um, an official in the government that. That's, you know, that's pretty much what they do. And I said, look, I. I'm trying to get my arms around this because I'm. I'm thinking about, you know, why he called it Liberation Day. And I think it's because he's changing the whole system. You know, that was set up after World War II and yada, yada, yada. And I said, and I don't think people understand that if he fails, this is it. This is our last chance to save America, that we're over. And this individual put their hand on my shoulder and said, no, listen, we are over. So he said the same thing I did. He just wanted to make sure that I understood exactly what I was saying. And I found that to be a little terrifying. And I don't think people truly understand. This is it. This is it. If, if you. If you want to have a country left, we're going to go and experience tremendous pain. Ronald Reagan talked about this. You know, there's going to come a time when none of the choices are good and everybody wants to eat around the edges and not take the whole pie. You have to have the whole pie. You're going to. You can't eat around the edges anymore. You've got to fix the entire thing. And that is going to be really painful and dangerous. And I. I don't know if I can get him to talk about that. I mean, how would you ask him?

Glenn Beck (28:40)

Is that. Do you think that's the way he sees it? Do you think he. Because it does seem like, with, like, the types of maneuvers he's made when it comes to foreign trade, for example, he really does see not just something we need to tweak. Right. Like an absolute monumental crisis. Right.

Stu Burguiere (28:56)

Yeah.

Glenn Beck (28:57)

So do you know, because that is a big change, and I think slightly different than maybe the perception was going in. And that's something he's going to have to kind of deal with with the American people. And it's why maybe he's having issues with some of the independents, losing support among independents. I don't think he's going to see. I don't think that's the way he runs his operation. I don't think he looks at it and says, okay, well, this isn't polling well right now, so I don't want to do it.

Stu Burguiere (29:30)

No, he doesn't.

Glenn Beck (29:31)

I think he looks at it.

Stu Burguiere (29:32)

He sees himself, and thank God he sees himself as if I don't do it, no one will. And I think that's true. I don't know of any. Donald Trump is completely unique. You know, he's been forged in the fire, where he wasn't in 2016. He is now. I mean, what are you gonna do to him? You try to throw him in jail. You tried to throw his family in jail. You've tried to destroy his business, his reputation. They've called him every name under the sun. They tried to kill him not once, but twice. I mean, what are you gonna do to this guy? He doesn't care. And so I really believe that this is so far beyond him. He knows. Look, I'm here at this time for a reason, and it's to save the country in the way I believe it needs to be saved. And so it is a complete departure from the great reset, but it is a great reset. The world has been shaping us for this reset. I've been talking about this since 2008. They shaped us for this reset to where they would manage the decline to a certain point, and then it would kind of fall apart and then collapse into this new system that they had built. Well, he's dismantling that at the same time trying to put the system back into place that they had taken apart. It's. I mean, it's. It's. If he can pull this off, it's going to be a miracle. We'll be the first people in the history of the world to pull this off. And it's. I mean, it's an interesting time to be alive. Gonna be interesting to see how well this works out. All right, more in just a second. Standby. This is the best of the Glenn Beck program. Here's something I didn't think I'd ever say. I'm gonna spend more time in Washington, D.C. i've learned so much in the last couple of days. Being able to meet with me with so many people. And then, you know, in the off times I went to. A couple of days ago, I went to the American Art Museum, Smithsonian's American Portraiture or something. What a dump that place is. My gosh. My gosh, what a dump. And so woke. I can't take it. I just can't take it. And I don't know, I think I'll talk to the President off air because I don't think anybody else cares, but he might. It's just a nightmare. Just a nightmare. By the way, thanks to Steve Bannon, I was on Steve Bannon show on Monday. When did that air yesterday? Yeah, aired yesterday. I went in Monday to do his show, and he aired it yesterday. Interesting. Really, really interesting. He. We disagree on things, but he also agrees with me that we're in trouble economically where people need to understand where we are in the grand scheme of things. And there is a serious mental illness problem happening on the streets of Washington, D.C. i mean, when you get into the Capitol Building, it's even worse, but on the streets, it is a serious mental illness. I mean, I've never seen anything like it. My wife has been with me this week, and she. She said. I've only heard say this once. She said it about 10 years ago in San Francisco. We went and people were taking a dump in the street, you know, right as we're walking. And it was just very dangerous feeling. And it was a nice section of San Francisco, and it doesn't exist anymore, but at that time, there still was a nice section of San Francisco. And she said, I'll never come to this city again. She said, I would never walk alone in this city. And I said, well, I'd be with you. And she's like, nah, walking with you is like walking alone. And so we're walking down the streets of Washington, D.C. and this guy starts to circle us on a bike, and he's got to be about 30 years old. And he just. He starts circling us, you know, riding his bike around us as we're walking. And he's like, I'm gonna kill me some white people today. I'm killing white people today. And I'm like, I know. I hate those white people. Huh? And he just kept circling, you know, could be you. Could be you. And he drives around, he's just, like, staring at me. Could be you today. You never know. And I thought, that's either mental. Well, it is absolutely mental illness. Or that is a societal thing that has caused this guy to think that that's totally cool to do that. Uh, but it is. It's. It's really bad. But the good news is the Democrats are here for you. There is a story in Politico that I absolutely love. Um, here's the headline, and I quote, there's a reckoning to be had. San Francisco Dems move to push the national party to the center. Now, that needs to. That. That's all you need to know. Okay? I mean, the gutter in which the Democrats find themselves. Now, if the. The Democrats from San Francisco is leading, they're. They're the ones leading the way. It's how much trouble they're in the story says, quote, they are attempting to lead by a national conversation around what it takes for Democrats to win by rejecting what they deride as performative politics and virtue, signaling and embracing pragmatism and quality of life issues. Really, this is rich. Democrats from the capital of left wing lunacy now are claiming they want to drag their party back to the middle. And in this story from Politico, they say they're now interested, get this on. Fully staffing police departments, erasing the local regulations that drive up the cost of building new housing and focusing on public schools and closing the learning gaps for black and Hispanic students in math and reading. Now this is wild. Cause I seem to remember that these are exactly the same people that just did the opposite. They're the ones shouting in the streets to defund the police, burning buildings down, yanking our founding father's name off of off of school buildings, passing Gaza like resolutions, like they're running the un, turning our cities into giant performance art galleries of needles and poop. These are the ones. And now they're like, you know what? Maybe we should have a few more cops and we should make sure our kids can read again and do math. Really? So were you defund when you were saying that defunding the policing, was that all? Were you joking about that or are you just joking about the math and other subjects being racist? Because I'm. According to the Politico story, they're also calling for imposing potential aid age limits on elected officials. Why? He's sharp as attack. No, no, he was sharp as attack. There was nothing, nothing to see there. Did you see the Elizabeth Warren interview she did with some. Oh my gosh, so good.

Glenn Beck (36:58)

We talked about it yesterday. It is. That was one of the most revealing things I've ever seen. I mean, she actually laughs. She can't stop herself from laughing at the concept that he was fine, even though she said it publicly over and over and over again.

Stu Burguiere (37:12)

Play that.

D (37:12)

Sarah, do you regret saying that President Biden had a mental acuity? He had a sharpness to him. You said that up until July of last year.

E (37:22)

I said what I believe to be true.

D (37:25)

And you think he was as sharp as you?

E (37:30)

I said I had not seen decline and I hadn't at that point.

D (37:37)

You did not see any decline from 2024 Joe Biden to 2021 Joe Biden?

E (37:42)

Not when I said that. You know, the thing is he look, look, he was sharp. He was on his feet. I saw him live event. I had meetings with him a couple of times.

D (37:58)

Senator on his feet is not praise. He can speak in sentences is not praise.

E (38:06)

Fair enough. Fair enough. Look, it is the question whenever a.

Stu Burguiere (38:13)

Politician says, look, what are we gonna do now?

D (38:15)

Okay.

Glenn Beck (38:17)

I mean, it's a great clip. He does a great job interviewing her. He does as well, pushing her on this because it's so obvious and it's so comical that she can't even keep a straight face. We use that term a lot. You can't keep a straight face. That's a great example of it. She legitimately, multiple times, laughs at her.

Stu Burguiere (38:39)

Own public statements like it's okay, like it's absolutely okay. And we're all in this joke together.

Glenn Beck (38:46)

We all get it.

Stu Burguiere (38:47)

He's sharp as a tack. The guy is a Roomba stuck in the corner of the room, man, just pounding into the. I mean, for the love of Pete. Now they're saying, you know, you gotta have an age limit for why we can have Bernie. Strategy with the new Bernie is, you know, maybe suboptimal right now. This is crazy. And I want to tell you that this is what you need to know about this. There is zero sincerity in this at all. You have no reason to believe this is sincere from the Democratic Party at all. But just pretend for a second that it is sincere. It would be enormous. It would be an enormous breakthrough. The heavens would part, the angels would sing if they actually deradicalized the Democratic Party. But they have no intention to do that. No intention to do that. Here's what's going on. San Francisco Democrats are calling their strategy new pragmatism. What does that mean? In other words, you don't have any real principles, just a willingness to rebrand according to which way the wind is blowing so you can look like you just want to get things done. They're not sorry for the clown show. Virtual signaling pop policies. Look how sad she is. Look at how much remorse she has. She's laughing at how she lied about the guy who had the finger on the nuclear button. Nobody should laugh at that. Nobody. Nobody. They are just terrified of losing again. Look, anytime a politician says, look, look, they're lying to you. San Francisco wants to be the model for Democrats to win back union workers, immigrants, young people, voters. They lost because they were too busy arguing that standardized tests are hate crimes. Good luck with that pivot, guys. Good luck. Good luck. You can't just. I, as a guy who has worked with chalkboards for a very long time, you can't just wipe the chalkboard clean. The whole country has seen your math, and I'm sorry. You have to scrub it clean. And you're busy scrubbing. But we all saw what you wrote on the chalkboard, and none of this adds up. Doesn't make any sense whatsoever.