California Leaders Blame Climate Change for Their Own Failures | 1/13/25

Summary

Summary of "California Leaders Blame Climate Change for Their Own Failures | 1/13/25"

The Glenn Beck Program for January 13, 2025, hosted by Pat Gray and Stu Burguiere in the absence of Glenn Beck, delves deep into the ongoing catastrophic wildfires in Los Angeles and the contentious debate over the real causes behind these disasters.

---

1. The Los Angeles Wildfire Catastrophe

The episode opens with an urgent discussion about the severe wildfires engulfing Los Angeles, resulting in 24 deaths and the destruction of thousands of buildings. Pat Gray sets the stage for a grim reality, emphasizing the scale of the disaster.

[02:46] Stu Burguiere: "Much of this could have been prevented... when you go to fire hydrants and there's no water in them, it makes it really hard to put out a fire."

2. Climate Change vs. Resource Management

A significant portion of the conversation revolves around whether climate change is genuinely responsible for the intensified wildfire seasons or if it's a convenient scapegoat for mismanaged resources, particularly water supplies.

[06:51] Pat Gray: "And here we are saying it again. Stuart Burguiere: And the answer that you've come up with is climate change. Is that... is that safe to assume?"

Stu Burguiere counters the climate change narrative by highlighting the historical presence of Santa Ana winds, arguing that such weather patterns are natural and have been exacerbated only marginally over the past century.

[10:57] Pat Gray: "And it spreads pretty, pretty easily... Democrats don't prioritize having water to fight it. But they're using climate change as a catch-all explanation."

3. Private Firefighting and Economic Inequality

The hosts discuss how wealthy individuals in California have employed private firefighters to protect their properties, contrasting this with the struggles of less affluent residents. This segment underscores the widening economic divide exacerbated by natural disasters.

[31:00] Pat Gray: "Why would you begrudge somebody saving their property? If you have the means, you do it."

A poignant story is shared about a man who, using his garden hose, managed to save his own home and his neighbors' by proactively fighting the flames, illustrating grassroots efforts in disaster-stricken areas.

[17:25] ... Discussion of personal stories and resilience.

4. Critique of California Leadership

Pat Gray and Stu Burguiere are critical of California leaders like Governor Gavin Newsom and Mayor Karen Bass, accusing them of mismanagement and using climate change as a default explanation to deflect responsibility.

[07:20] Stu Burguiere: "It's the only one they have. It's a... if you think of like a Fast and Furious sequel... they have to go with climate change. There's no other way."

They argue that this narrative is ineffective in addressing the root causes of the disasters and instead serves to protect political reputations.

5. Broader Implications and Comparisons

The conversation expands to compare the current wildfire situation with past events like the COVID-19 pandemic and the Afghanistan withdrawal, suggesting a pattern of leadership failures masked by external explanations.

[05:36] Pat Gray: "It didn't seem possible that that sort of chaos and destruction could happen in a country like America."

6. Shifting Focus to Free Speech and Social Media Censorship

Later in the episode, the hosts transition to discussing Mark Zuckerberg's recent statements on censorship and free speech, critiquing his stance and the broader implications for free expression on platforms like Facebook and TikTok.

[43:00] Stu Burguiere: "These people from the Biden administration would call up our team... but they decided to take them down... it's like they were outreach fighting back."

7. National Security Concerns: TikTok Ban

Pat Gray and Stu Burguiere express strong opinions on the potential ban of TikTok in the United States, citing national security risks associated with Chinese influence over the platform.

[65:00] Pat Gray: "There's a real national security risk with letting the Chinese government run your kids' lives. That's not a good policy."

8. Speculation on Greenland Acquisition

In a lighter yet politically charged segment, the hosts speculate humorously about the American purchase of Greenland, debating its economic viability and strategic importance.

[73:20] Pat Gray: "What do you need for $27.36 trillion? I’m in."

9. Political Commentary: Biden Administration and Pardons

The episode also touches on the Biden administration's handling of January 6th convicts, with discussions around potential pardons and the perceived injustices in sentencing.

[107:46] Pat Gray: "Look, assign somebody competent in the Trump administration. Get in there... hopefully they've done that and they probably could have that done already."

10. Sports and Daylight Saving Time

Towards the end, the conversation briefly shifts to sports, celebrating the Eagles' victory over the Packers, and concludes with opinions on the perennial debate over daylight saving time.

[90:00] Stu Burguiere: "Do you think he would have done that? Absolutely. He doesn't know it's Trump at the time..."

---

Notable Quotes with Timestamps

• Stu Burguiere [02:46]: "Much of this could have been prevented... when you go to fire hydrants and there's no water in them, it makes it really hard to put out a fire."

• Pat Gray [07:20]: "It's a catch-all for every single problem that they have. They just blame it on climate change."

• Stu Burguiere [65:00]: "There's a real national security risk with letting the Chinese government run your kids' lives."

• Pat Gray [73:20]: "What do you need for $27.36 trillion? I’m in."

---

Conclusion

The episode presents a critical view of how California leadership handles natural disasters, challenging the predominant narrative that climate change is the main culprit behind the worsening wildfire seasons. Pat Gray and Stu Burguiere argue for a more nuanced understanding that includes resource management and economic factors, highlighting the disparities in disaster responses based on socioeconomic status. Additionally, the hosts expand their critique to broader societal issues, including social media censorship and national security concerns.

For listeners interested in conservative perspectives on American politics and culture, this episode offers a comprehensive and impassioned analysis of current events, interwoven with discussions on free speech, economic inequality, and political accountability.

Transcript

[Pat Gray]

Down the road where shadows hide Feel.

[Stu Burguiere]

The dark on every side Stand your.

[Pat Gray]

Ground when times get down Gotta face.

[Stu Burguiere]

The dark and embrace the fire. The fusion of entertainment and enlightenment. This is the Glenn Beck program today featuring Pat Stu for Glenn, who we would love for you to keep in your thoughts and prayers. Prayers if you can. Today he's having a little bit of a health issue. Hopefully nothing serious, but wish him well and speedy recovery here. In the meantime, the catastrophe in Los Angeles continues. Wow, 24 deaths so far. Just thousands and thousands of buildings destroyed. People's lives turned upside down. We'll get into that and lots more coming up in 60 seconds.

[Pat Gray]

What if I told you that it's not only possible to get rid of most or all of that pain you've been carrying around for so long, but that you could even potentially go back to feeling the way you used to? Remember those days back when you didn't have to check in with your body before everything that you did just to make sure it wasn't going to betray you. Glenn used to suffer from horrible pain all the time, but Relief Factor changed all of that. It is a daily supplement that helps your body fight the pain that you have by fighting the inflammation that you have, which is the source of most of the pain in our bodies and a lot of disease as well. It's 100% drug free. It's developed by doctors to help reduce or eliminate pain. Over a million people have tried Relief Factor's Quick Start kit and 70% of them have gone on to order it again because it's working for them. Make 2025, the year of feeling good and living. Great trying relief factor is easy. Just get their three week quick start kit for only $19.95. It's less than a buck a day. It's 1-800-the number four relief. 1, 800, the number four relief. Give them a call, check out, give it a try. Reliefactor.com it's relieffactor.com.

[Stu Burguiere]

All right. The catastrophe that is Los Angeles right now. Much of this, so much of this could have been prevented. You know, it could have been minimized, that's for sure. A lot of this could have been mitigated. It didn't have to sweep out of control like it has been. But when you go to fire hydrants and there's no water in them, it makes it really hard to put out a fire.

[Pat Gray]

Now, is that scientifically confirmed? Is that consensus?

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, I think they're looking into it.

[Pat Gray]

Okay, but. Okay.

[Stu Burguiere]

Initial research has shown that water does Help. So the water event of a fire.

[Pat Gray]

So water would help the situation.

[Stu Burguiere]

We think that's accurate because they have those things.

[Pat Gray]

I thought the fire hydrants were there just to make sure you didn't park.

[Stu Burguiere]

In a particular area and for somewhere for dogs to pee.

[Pat Gray]

Yes, exactly. Yeah.

[Stu Burguiere]

That used to be the case. But now saying, no, no, they can actually help fight fire. Wow. Yeah. It's weird.

[Pat Gray]

Wow. They should have. If we knew that in advance, maybe we could have made sure they had water.

[Stu Burguiere]

Right.

[Pat Gray]

You know, but people, I mean, what are the odds of a fire occurring in California? You know, other. You know, one to one is probably.

[Stu Burguiere]

What I would put, like 100%.

[Pat Gray]

100%.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah.

[Stu Burguiere]

But not. They're not 500%. It's just 100%.

[Pat Gray]

It's 100% chance. Yeah.

[Stu Burguiere]

Every year it's going to happen. And every year the Santa Ana winds are going to blow.

[Pat Gray]

Well, those are, of course, new because of climate change, that they've never occurred before this year.

[Stu Burguiere]

They've always blown. The Santa Ana winds have always been around.

[Pat Gray]

Really? Yeah. Is that why they have songs and movies about them?

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, that's why.

[Pat Gray]

Okay.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

They've been around for a long time.

[Stu Burguiere]

Because you continue to be around.

[Pat Gray]

You think by watching the news that they were brand new, you'd think that this was a shocking development.

[Stu Burguiere]

There's never been fire and there's never been wind in California. I mean, Albert Hammond wrote a song about this a long time ago. It never rains in California but girl, don't they warn you. It pours, man. It pours.

[Pat Gray]

Wow. How deep can you go in that song? If I were to just quiz you right now, how do you go?

[Stu Burguiere]

Pretty deep.

[Pat Gray]

You could go from the beginning all the way through the song. I mean, I wouldn't mind. I think the people of California are like, we've had a tough week.

[Stu Burguiere]

It'd be nice to hear a little Albert Hammond.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah. That's what they're thinking. The vocal stylings of Pat Gray.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah. Or not. You know, they may not.

[Pat Gray]

Okay. Or not. Okay. Okay. They don't. They don't need a second tragedy on top of the first one.

[Stu Burguiere]

No, they do not.

[Pat Gray]

It is.

[Stu Burguiere]

I mean, because you mentioned for him so much.

[Pat Gray]

20. 24.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah. Dead 24.

[Pat Gray]

That number is not staying at 24.

[Stu Burguiere]

No.

[Pat Gray]

That is going to go a lot higher. This is a. This is a. It's a catastrophe on the level of like one I. You'd look at the United States of America and think it wouldn't be possible. You know, I Felt that way about at the time.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

Like, it didn't seem possible that that sort of chaos and destruction could happen in a country like America. You know, it can. You know, it's there. You know, the possibility's there. But you think we're not gonna blow it so badly that the response to the fire is going to make it seemingly worse?

[Stu Burguiere]

Well, I heard you and Glenn talking last week about the fact that this reminded him of an Irwin Allen movie from the 1970s. You know, one of those fire. Yeah, that's what it' it's, you know, with a. It's a really bad Charlton Heston feature. And, you know, he's the fire chief of Los Angeles, and they're out of water and somehow the embers are really big and fat now and they're blowing all over the place like that again, like that's never happened before. But it is. It's freakish. Like a. Like one of those disaster movies.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah.

[Stu Burguiere]

That we used to see all the time, except it's. It's playing out in real time right before our eyes in the. The greatest nation that's ever existed. How is this possible?

[Pat Gray]

Yeah, you know, we've said that a lot lately.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

You know, I said. I said that during COVID How is this possible? I said that during Afghanistan, the withdrawal there. How is this possible that we could be involved in such a thing?

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

And here we are saying it again.

[Stu Burguiere]

And the answer that you've come up with is climate change. Is that. Is that safe to assume?

[Pat Gray]

Seemingly didn't have much to do with what was going on in Afghanistan, though they have tried to blame it on climate change.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah. No, I mean, climate change is mentioned in every news story.

[Stu Burguiere]

Every single one. And that's what Gavin Newsom and. And Karen Bass are turning to because.

[Pat Gray]

Because it's the only one they have. Like, it's.

[Stu Burguiere]

It's.

[Pat Gray]

If you think of like a Fast and Furious sequel. And Vin Diesel's driving his car on. On a. On a bridge at 147 miles an hour. And as he comes over the hump of the bridge, he realizes the bridge in front of him is out, Right. And luckily there's this one, like, incline. Like someone left a launch him.

[Stu Burguiere]

A certain.

[Pat Gray]

Exactly.

[Stu Burguiere]

Over the.

[Pat Gray]

And as he's pulling up, his options are either to just go down into the canyon or aim for that one board that's leaning up against the traffic cone that's gonna bring him across the gulch.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah. But surely he can't hit that.

[Pat Gray]

Know what? It's a Terrible option.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

But there's no other place to go. It's either die for sure or attempt to go over the gap in the bridge. And so he goes, and he aims for that one board and he hits it and it go. He goes up in the air and he flips over like four times and you know, the girl he's with, top falls off. And as they're in the air in slow motion.

[Stu Burguiere]

That's convenient.

[Pat Gray]

It happens, you know, it does. And so, you know, these, these. A halter top is not built for such things.

[Stu Burguiere]

No.

[Pat Gray]

You know, that's not what it's made for anyway, so that. And then, of course, they land perfectly in their, you know, juiced up, you know, Dodge Challenger. And with really good suspension, really good suspension, it's. It's completely fine. They drive off. But that's kind of what they're trying to do here. Every other road ends in their own destruction. Every other excuse, every explanation for what has occurred here points back to Democrats and the way they've done their job. Except climate change, because that's the one they can blame on you in Ohio.

[Stu Burguiere]

Right.

[Pat Gray]

They can blame that on you driving around a minivan in Indiana. That one's your fault. Every other explanation for this is their fault. And they can't go to any one of those roads. Every single one of those roads leads back to them. So they have to go with climate change. There's no other way. That's it. They are absolutely screwed. If you don't believe that a 0.9% Celsius, excuse me, climate temperature increase over a century. If you don't believe that is responsible for these fires. It's them, it's their jobs, it's their reputation, it's their party that dies.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

So it better be climate change. And that's what they're going for.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, I. It just. Will it work on the American people again? Will it work on Southern Californians right now? I think a lot of them are starting to wake up a bit, you know.

[Pat Gray]

I hope so.

[Stu Burguiere]

You have to.

[Pat Gray]

If they don't, it's hopeless.

[Stu Burguiere]

When your house is, is sitting there in ashes and you. That's what you come back to after you've evacuated and then gone back to see what happened. You, you can't be buying into the climate change garbage, can you? I mean, it's just every single year they have these fires in California every single year. It's not new to the 21st century. It wasn't new to the 20th century. It just, it happens all the time. There this is, happens to be in a more vulnerable area of Southern California than normal. And so it's burned down more structures than normal. But that's not climate change. That just, that just happens to be where this fire began and then spread because of the wind.

[Pat Gray]

It has lots of fuel in that area. Obviously the houses are close together.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

And it spreads pretty, pretty easily. Particularly pat. I've noticed it spreads pretty easily when you don't have water to fight it. Yeah, you know, I mean, when you can't do anything to stop it, fire just keeps going. It's like a perpetual motion machine. Just keeps going and going and going and no one, when you don't stop it, it just keeps going. That's what fire does. And apparently no Democrats in the entire state of California were aware of this fact because they didn't prioritize, you know, having water to fight it. But you're right, even if you take the climate change argument seriously, which is hard to do frankly in this position, climate change, it's just a catch all for every single problem that they have. They just blame it on climate change. But even if you take it seriously, what you're talking about is these winds that have existed forever, are they a few percent worse? Okay, let's just take that seriously. Okay, maybe they are. Is that the difference between this entire city burning down or not? No. Is it dry? Yeah, it's dry. Is it a little bit drier than normal? I mean, I don't think there's a ton of evidence to support that, but okay, it's a few percent drier than it normally was 50 years ago. Is that the reason that the entire Palisades burned to the ground?

[Stu Burguiere]

Like.

[Pat Gray]

No, of course not. No person could possibly believe such a thing. It's so inherently and obviously stupid that they just hope your emotion or distrust or hatred for the other side, hatred for Donald Trump, hatred for Republicans. They just hope that built in foundational part of California life is strong enough to absolve them from their own actions.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, right.

[Pat Gray]

That's it. That's all they have. That is it.

[Stu Burguiere]

And let's hope and pray it doesn't work this time. I mean, because it's going to happen again if they don't do something about it. You know, if they don't change their policies, then this will keep happening. It'll happen every year at about this time. All right, we're gonna, we're gonna play for you what the LA fire chief had to say over the weekend. Pretty amazing. Coming up in one minute.

[Pat Gray]

I Will say, too. Pat asked for your prayers as we were going to be starting the show for Glenn. And there was a couple different ways his health issue could have gone. One was a little bit more negative and one was a little more positive. And I don't know, I don't know if you're sitting in your car and you said some prayers right then, because I just got a text message that it went the good way.

[Stu Burguiere]

Oh, good.

[Pat Gray]

So good. A very good outcome here for Glenn, and we hope now to see him back tomorrow. So he'll tell you all about it, I'm sure, I'm sure in more detail than you could possibly ever desire. He will tell you about it.

[Stu Burguiere]

Hopefully there's a hemorrhoid video coming out or something.

[Pat Gray]

Who knows?

[Stu Burguiere]

Is that on the way?

[Pat Gray]

No, I don't think so.

[Stu Burguiere]

You didn't get that?

[Pat Gray]

No. He certainly didn't send the video. So that's at least something positive. All right, let me tell you about realestate Agents. I trust dot com. Something you think about a lot as you get older is trust. Who are the people that you trust? Do you trust your California government? What about the businesses that you trust? This used to be kind of a handshake deal, kind of country. I don't know if it still is. Could it be that again? You'd like to think so. That's definitely what Glenn was going for when he started his company. Realestateagentsitrust.com they pair you with the best real estate agent in your area. And they know because they're the best. They, they vet them six ways to Sunday. These are people who work hard to be in their industry and to make sure that they're the best in that industry. They'll do everything that you need to make sure buying and selling a home can be the best process that it can be. Look, it can be really annoying, frankly, but they can make it as good as possible. At least check it out. If you're moving across the street or across the country, they're going to help you with every step of that process. Realestateagentsitrust.com, the name says it all. It's realestateagentsitrust.com and a free service to you. Realestate agentsitrust.com 10 seconds. Station ID. All right. Welcome back. The Glenn Beck Program. Glenn will be back tomorrow. It looks like 888-727. Beck is the phone number.

[Stu Burguiere]

Have you seen this animation of the fire spreading? Now, let's, let's, Take a look at that real quick. If. If you're watching together this incredible animation.

[Pat Gray]

That shows the timeline of how this.

[Stu Burguiere]

Fire advanced through the communities of Pacific Palisades and Malibu.

[Pat Gray]

Here it is, January at 617.

[Stu Burguiere]

It was at 2900 acres.

[Pat Gray]

And then on January 8th, that explosion to 15,000 acres.

[Stu Burguiere]

And then the next day, 17,000 acres as it progressed into the mountains. And then on the 9th, 19,000 acres. And you can see how far it.

[Pat Gray]

Had gotten into Malibu.

[Stu Burguiere]

And then we come to yesterday at 20,000 acres. And you can see 20 and then to 21,000 acres. But you see how far across it spread and all the way up to the 11th, which is today at 22,660 acres.

[Pat Gray]

This is just information from 7:30am today.

[Stu Burguiere]

Wow.

[Pat Gray]

Feel terrible for these people. I mean, video. My wife. I don't know if your wife's like this, but my wife is like, you know, lying in bed before she goes to sleep, just watching video after video of like really sad people coming back to their homes and. And, you know, rediscovering there. You know, she was watching one with a. The dog was still alive. Like some. The dog was in the house, but got, I guess, got out. It stayed in the area. He came back to his house, which is totally burned down, and the dog like runs out.

[Stu Burguiere]

Oh, wow.

[Pat Gray]

I mean, like, stuff like that. It's just stuff like that constantly. You know, this is a very online, social media friendly community. Right. Like a lot of people there, like they post all the time. Anyway, a lot of influencers live in this area, so there's just obviously celebrities. So you have that unending flow of content from the area. And it's just. It's so terrible. It is, it is. You know, these people have more resources than others that have gone through natural disasters. And that's maybe a positive for at least the recovery. But geez, man, this is terrible. I don't care who you are.

[Stu Burguiere]

It is.

[Pat Gray]

You know, I feel real empathy.

[Stu Burguiere]

And it's not all celebrities.

[Pat Gray]

No.

[Stu Burguiere]

You know, like there was this. There was a guy who ignored the evacuation order and stayed to try to save his house. And so he did. And his. He was saying that he inherited that house from his parents. He lived there since 1960. In 1960, that house was probably 15 or $20,000. Yeah. You know, it might be worth 5 million now, but he doesn't have 5 million to rebuild. So he stayed put, ignored the evacuation order, took his garden hose and put out all the fires anywhere near the area that started to Flare up near his house. He saved his two of his neighbors homes and his own by just soaking them down when they sprang up. And I guess he soaked himself down too so that he wouldn't catch on fire. Soaked down the homes, you know, and it just, it just shows you what could have happened if they had the manpower to get ahead of these flames and do these kinds of things.

[Pat Gray]

How was, how did he know before the fire started that water would. Would do anything to them? How was he.

[Stu Burguiere]

I guess he's like a. A scientist.

[Pat Gray]

Okay.

[Stu Burguiere]

Of some sort. Yeah. And he'd been doing some research into the physics of fire.

[Pat Gray]

Okay.

[Stu Burguiere]

For the last several years. And wow, what a miracle. I know.

[Pat Gray]

Thank God he. I know he had thought of that. I mean, a gard. Because you do watch it as it spreads. You know, they start off really small. Like whenever hits a house and there's a little tiny thing if you're there with a fire with your garden hose.

[Stu Burguiere]

You can put it out easily.

[Pat Gray]

Easily. Of course, you know, it's really, really dangerous to stay there.

[Stu Burguiere]

It is risky and it was for him. But he said based on his experience with previous fires, he at least knew something. What to do. Of what to do.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah.

[Stu Burguiere]

For instance, that water may put out the flames. That was one of the things he knew credible.

[Pat Gray]

It would have been great to know that beforehand.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah. It would have. Would have been pretty helpful, I think. But I don't know if this will make any difference to the officials in California. Will it make any difference to Gavin Newsom or will he just continue to.

[Pat Gray]

Chalk it up to 0.9 degrees Celsius over a century?

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah. Because this will happen again again and again and again if they don't do something about it.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah. And by the way, globally, we're not seeing any increase in the amount of acreage burned. So I mean, if it's climate change, you'd think now this is a really terrible event. But this is not going to make the global percentage of acreage burned any different. It's a small area when you think about the Earth. It's just where all these structures are. That's why these things burn in the middle of nowhere often and we just don't really notice them. We had those Australia fires a few years ago and what they found out, it was actually a below average year. We hear nonstop coverage about how terrible it was for Australia at the end of the year. It was a below average year for the amount of acreage burned.

[Stu Burguiere]

Incredible.

[Pat Gray]

I mean, look, this is incredible. You'd think only the opposite. If you actually looked at the news because they try to tell you the opposite. And look at climate change, can it have a factor around the fringes? Maybe. But that's not the difference between that might be the let's say it's the difference between a thousand homes burning and 998 homes burning. Now, if you're in those two homes, probably means a lot to you, but at the end of the day, that's not the cause here. You need to be able to be prepared to fight these things because they're going to happen whether you think you can control the global temperature or not. These fires are coming. They're going to happen. You need to be prepared for them. And not managing the land, not having the water ready, sitting here and using your resources on DEI nonsense and seeing how many lesbian firefighters you can hire is not a good process to make that happen.

[Stu Burguiere]

This is Glenn Beck.

[Pat Gray]

We're coming up on January 27, which is international Holocaust Remembrance Day. Now, it's been almost 80 years since the Nazi reign of terror over the Jews came to a crashing end and the world came to truly know once again the depths of evil that we human beings are unfortunately capable of. But its effects are still felt all over the world to this day. And of course, the anti Semitism which drove it is still very much alive and well. That's one of the many reasons that we've partnered with the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews. They're providing food, shelter and safety to Jews in Israel and around the world, including those remaining Holocaust survivors. Will you please donate to them today? If you have the means, we'd appreciate it. They're helping provide food and water and medicine and other basic necessities to Jewish communities. In a world that holds a lot of darkness for the Jewish people, you can be a part of the light shining out from the Christian world. To our brothers and sisters. Give a gift to show your support of the Jewish people by visiting supportifcj.org, it's one word, supportifcj.org or call them 888-488-IFCJ, 88488, IFCJ or 888-488-4325 supportifcj.org and.

[Stu Burguiere]

Check out my show, Pat Grey Unleashed. Every weekday between 7 and 9 Eastern, 6 and 8 Central, or anytime and anywhere you get your podcasts. It's Pat and Stu for Glenn today, Triple eight seven two seven, beck. We were foes yesterday, friends today, but my, my NFL team played his NFL team sort of packers were down to like no players. No, they had to have. They had to have some substitutes from Oshkosh Junior College JV team. And that's. That's who played the second half yesterday.

[Pat Gray]

So I don't know I've ever seen a game like that. There's.

[Stu Burguiere]

I haven't either. Everybody was getting hurt on every play.

[Pat Gray]

And they weren't even like, you know, you. Because I do remember one or two games where there was like people trying to intentionally injure the other team where I remember that happening like back in like the old Saints teams that happened with.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

But actually I think an old Eagles team as well. Of course. But this one was like a lot of them were just like friendly fire. Like it was like, you know, guys just rolling into their own teammates ankles. Like it was just.

[Stu Burguiere]

No, it didn't seem like dirty play. It just seemed like it was happened. Yeah. Just happened. And so the packers lost their top three wide receivers, their offensive line.

[Pat Gray]

That was a lot. It was a lot to deal with. I do feel for you in some way.

[Stu Burguiere]

But the Eagles wound up winning 2210 and moving on. So who do they play next week?

[Pat Gray]

We don't have a Knights game, which is the. It's the Rams and the Vikings. Should be an interesting one in Philly next weekend.

[Stu Burguiere]

Do you believe that the football season is almost over already?

[Pat Gray]

I know.

[Stu Burguiere]

Incredible how fast that went by.

[Pat Gray]

I will say I did note that next Sunday they're the early game. I think 2:30 Eastern Time. Eagles are playing in Philly. And I did also just get the approval or final. Okay. That I'm going to be going up and covering the inauguration of President Trump next week, which is on Monday. Oh, and I noticed the Eagles, D.C. and Philly pretty close, like just in a cellar right away. And I was thinking maybe I need to get up there, you know, early, you know, and just kind of make my way over to the Eagles just because I'm. Since I'm right there. Plus, I will say thinking about trying to take a plane into Washington D.C. for this thing. I mean, it's gonna be a catastrophe.

[Stu Burguiere]

Oh yeah.

[Pat Gray]

I can't even imagine what the travel is gonna be like going there. I'm already dreading it. But I'm saying.

[Stu Burguiere]

So it would make more sense to fly into Philadelphia.

[Pat Gray]

People aren't going there.

[Stu Burguiere]

It's what, an hour, hour and a half away.

[Pat Gray]

Something. It doesn't matter what the details are on that, Pat. Whatever it is, I will say it's going to be pretty exciting. We're Going to be hosting coverage on BlazeTV. The inauguration falls live in the third hour of this broadcast. The lead up to it. And then I think the inauguration happens immediately after that. Will be on Blaze tv. Then hosting that and showing all that. At least, at least this is what we're talking about. So I'm excited about it. Yeah, I'm excited to see it and I've never been to one of those before. It'll be interesting to watch all that play out. Kind of amazing piece of history and a good one too. I mean, we do have a lot of negative things going on right now. I will be happy to see someone, really anyone in the White House because I don't think currently we have anyone. We did have Joe Biden for a time. I'm not sure when that ended. Maybe 2022, 2021.

[Stu Burguiere]

Right.

[Pat Gray]

Not exactly sure when he stopped becoming.

[Stu Burguiere]

Ended about the time it began. I think that's when he was pretty well gone.

[Pat Gray]

He certainly wasn't. Couldn't have been president when the Afghanistan withdrawal happened. So sometime before that. So I don't know.

[Stu Burguiere]

But he claims that went as well as it possibly could, though. Yeah. So I know, it's interesting. It's interesting. I mean, nothing went wrong with this administration. They were completely scandal free. I don't know if you're aware of.

[Pat Gray]

That, but Completely, Completely scandal free, huh?

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, yeah. Completely scandal free.

[Pat Gray]

I keep hearing that he's gonna make a bunch of speeches this week. Joe Biden. Oh, yes. To cement his legacy.

[Stu Burguiere]

Oh my gosh.

[Pat Gray]

You know, and.

[Stu Burguiere]

Okay, you keep trying, Keep trying.

[Pat Gray]

I don't think you want that legacy cemented. I think you'd want it to be washed away.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah. You want people to forget.

[Pat Gray]

Yes. You ever have a, you know, I mean, a job, you ever have a job that you just leave off your resume? And now thinking about this, you worked with Glenn Beck, so yes, of course you wanted to leave certain jobs off your resume. I never worked.

[Stu Burguiere]

Who? Pat.

[Pat Gray]

Who?

[Stu Burguiere]

No, that wasn't Glenn and Pat.

[Pat Gray]

That's a different person completely. But like that's what you should do if you're Joe Biden.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

Just. What if you claim you weren't president?

[Stu Burguiere]

I mean, they might as well. They lie about everything else. Why not?

[Pat Gray]

And then we'll start getting think pieces like why the right is seizing on Joe Biden claim that he was not president. Like, wait, I feel like, really, shouldn't.

[Stu Burguiere]

We be seizing on that?

[Pat Gray]

Yeah, yeah, yeah. They've been doing that with Elon Musk now because he's been talking about this huge scandal in. Was it Britain? Great Britain, where they. With the abuse of young women by Pakistani immigrants. And it's terrible. There's Germany. I can't remember this their story off the top of my head. It's seemingly all over the place. Anyway, they're like, ah, can you believe he's seizing on this? What's up with that? Why does he care so much about kids being abused and molested?

[Stu Burguiere]

That's weird.

[Pat Gray]

What a weird interest to have. What's going on with Elon Musk? What does that say about him? That he cares that children are being molested? Something bad. We're not going to say what it is, but you can put two and two together. Wait. I think we should all be concerned about. Concerned about that.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, definitely. Let's shine a little light on that situation because up until now nobody has. It's been going on for a while. I mean, there's like thousands of these rapes that have happened and we haven't heard a thing about it until now. I, you know, if Musk doesn't talk about it, who is going to? Probably nobody.

[Pat Gray]

Seems like accountability is important.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

And in raising the possibility of accountability is a worthwhile pursuit.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yes. Now, as far as the accountability on. On this Los Angeles wildfire, who will accept accountability for that? I think no one will. That's. That's basically the way this goes every single time, especially in California. We're just talking about football. They. Things are so bad. Obviously they had to move the Los Angeles Rams, Minnesota Vikings game from Los Angeles to Arizona tonight, which is problematic.

[Pat Gray]

I guess, in the grand scheme of things. A smaller problem.

[Stu Burguiere]

Smaller problem. People dealing with still an inconvenience and a weird thing for a lot of people who paid a lot of money to be there.

[Pat Gray]

And also the team having a home game, which they basically don't have now.

[Stu Burguiere]

Right, right. I mean, it's a neutral field now.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah. So obviously football well down the list of concerns in this particular situation. But that is a massive thing.

[Stu Burguiere]

A concern.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah. Your team loses a home game, you know, maybe you've gone through a bunch of stuff here and you want to go see your team play.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

And it's going to be like that one night of diversion from all the horror that going on in that area.

[Stu Burguiere]

I was kind of wondering why. Is it because San Diego is not an NFL town anymore. They didn't move it there. It seems like San Diego would have been, I don't know, closer, more convenient.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah. Seems.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, seems like it would have been more San Diego, where the Chargers used to play, instead of moving it clear to Phoenix, Arizona.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah. Or, you know, you could have gone to Oakland or San Francisco or.

[Stu Burguiere]

Right.

[Pat Gray]

You know, but, you know. Yeah, yeah. At least keep it in the state. Right. But no, they did not do that. So, you know, I guess it's. The facilities are, you know, nice there and ready to go.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah. And it's an NFL city, so maybe that has something to do with it. I don't know. Yeah. But apparently a lot of people are pissed off at millionaires who have hired private firefighters to come and guard and protect their home.

[Pat Gray]

This is amazing.

[Stu Burguiere]

Fires where I. I'm not sure where the anger comes from. If I had the means to do that, you better believe I would do that. I would. Obviously, if you're a multi, multi millionaire, are you going to pay 2000 bucks an hour to have some private firefighters come and save your house? Of course, that's worth maybe 10 or 20 million dollars or 30 million. Who knows how much some of these homes are worth? But of course you do it. Right. And just because not everybody can do it doesn't mean you shouldn't, does it? Or am I mistaken on that? I. I guess you should only do what all Americans can do, and that's watch your house burn to the ground.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah. It's a nice picture of what the left really thinks about this stuff.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

Because they don't want everyone to be better. They want everyone to be equal. Even if that means a lot of people have to get worse if their life has to get worse. Right. Like they'd rather have those homes, those multi million dollar homes burned to the ground like everybody else's. Because that would be fair. Right. It would be fair to them to see those people get punished in the same way when in reality, what you'd like to do. And this happened with a lot of very wealthy people who brought in private firefighters. Not only did they save their house, but they saved a lot of houses around them.

[Stu Burguiere]

Neighboring houses.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah. Caruso, who was the guy who almost became mayor of Los Angeles. God, this one looked a lot different. If he was, he wouldn't have been in Ghana when this started, I can promise you that.

[Stu Burguiere]

Right.

[Pat Gray]

But he has. The Palisades Mall is his property. And he brought in private firefighters. They were able to protect it and a bunch of homes.

[Stu Burguiere]

They saved it.

[Pat Gray]

And structures around the mall, they saved that whole area.

[Stu Burguiere]

And it was a pretty big area. And what happens with these private firefighters is they have their own water tankers and so they bring them in and they don't have to rely on the fire hydrants. They've got these tankers filled with water and. And they saved the whole thing because when the embers start flaring up, you just put them out like the homeowner did with his garden hose. These firefighters did the same thing for that outdoor mall. And as you mentioned, the surrounding area saved that whole area. And there was some video taken of it, which we can't play because I don't have the rights to it. But we. Of some people driving through the area showing the mall in pristine condition, mostly, although Caruso says said there was some damage. But then they get to the end of the street and they show the. What happened across the street from the mall. Complete devastation. It's totally burned to ash.

[Pat Gray]

Jeez.

[Stu Burguiere]

I. I mean, of course you're going to save your property if you can. Why would you begrudge somebody doing that? I don't. I don't begin to understand that.

[Pat Gray]

And places like the Associated Press are saying, you know, this. This event could increase inequality. Could it?

[Stu Burguiere]

Could it?

[Pat Gray]

Could it?

[Stu Burguiere]

In what? And, well, I saw that headline.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah.

[Stu Burguiere]

I was too irritated to even read the article. What about it will increase? Is that because my place is standing and yours isn't? Right. That's the inequality.

[Pat Gray]

I mean, that's terrible. We don't want that to happen.

[Stu Burguiere]

We don't want that.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah.

[Stu Burguiere]

If your place burns down, all places should burn down. Is that. That's equal?

[Pat Gray]

That would be equal. Equality. That's what we're searching for, right? We're searching for equality above all else.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah. Heck, with every other concept known to man, let's just have equality. So if your house burns down, I gotta let mine burn down whether I have firefighters there or not. Yeah, it makes a lot of sense. That's really good. Triple eight, seven, two, seven, Beck. More coming up.

[Pat Gray]

When you're at work, you kind of like being in the salt mines. You work grueling hours in terrible conditions around people like Glenn. If you're me. And you know, it's just obviously a terrible experience. But when you go home at night, exhausted from these incredible labors of speaking for a couple of hours a day, you want to be pampered with comfort and luxury because you deserve it after everything you've had to put up with. And you can get it with Cozy Earth. Cozy Earth's bedding, pajamas, bath products. They're all designed specifically for you. Their products are soft, breathable, and made with the highest quality materials. Even Oprah agrees with Glenn about these sheets. Those they don't agree on a lot, but they agree on that. Cozy Earth's been featured on her Favorite Things seven times. This is a luxury that's affordable, but the emphasis is on the word luxury because the quality and craftsmanship are simply amazing. You're going to love this stuff. Cozy Earth stands behind that quality as well. All their products come with a 10 year warranty and 100 night sleep trial for the bedding products. You can send it back, but you won't. You can wrap yourself in luxury with cozy earth. It's cozyearth.com beck. Use the code beck for up to 40% off. It's cozyearth dot com beck. Please don't forget to mention that Glenn sent you on your post purchase survey, if you would. It's cozyearth.

[Stu Burguiere]

You want the truth? Unfiltered. Pull up a chair, my friend. Friend, you're in the right place. This is Glenn.

[Pat Gray]

Becky, Foreign.

[Stu Burguiere]

Stu for Glenn today. Triple eight seven two seven. Beck. All right. We're talking about the inequality that this fire is now bringing. It could actually increase. We're finding out the inequality in this country.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah.

[Stu Burguiere]

And you might be wondering, well, how.

[Pat Gray]

Right the California wildfires could be leaving deeper inequality in their wake. You might think that's not the right thing to focus on right now, but of course you would be wrong. They give you example. Samantha Santoro, who's 22, a first generation college student at Cal Poly Pomona, remembered being annoyed when the initial news coverage of the wildfires focused more on celebrities. She and her sister who attends UC Berkeley, worry how their Mexican immigrant parents and working class neighbors who lost their homes will move forward. We don't have like, oh, I'll just go to my second home and stay there. She said the landlord of their family's two bedroom house probably evil.

[Stu Burguiere]

Probably.

[Pat Gray]

Well, it could be. We don't know for sure. We have to find out the skin color and their genitals and who they're attracted to before we know if they're a villain in the story or not. But the landlord of the family's two bedroom house with a pool. Again, this is not exactly like usually these sad stories aren't homes with pools the way that this normally goes. They had increased the $1,650 rent, making it possible for the Santoros to affordably raise their or they had never increased the rent. Excuse me. So they must be good. They were able to raise their daughters affordably. Now they're temporarily staying with a relative in Pasadena. The family has renters insurance, but not much else. I think it's hard to believe that you have nothing. Of course, this is. These stories are really tragic and really horrible no matter how much money you have. That's why this is annoying. It's not about how much money the person who lost their home has now. Yes, you can make it better. If you're a huge celebrity, you got millions and millions of dollars. Yes, your situation is going to be better. Better, by the way, this is why you work hard through life. This is what. It doesn't mean you're going to be rich. You try. But why do you try to get rich, Pat? Is it because you want 9,000 Ferraris? Look, 9,000 Ferraris, I'm sure is wonderful. However, the reason you actually do this is because when you have bad events like this, you're able to make it better.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, I could stay at the Beverly Hills Inn if I. If, you know, if you have that kind of money, then, you know, you can kind of weather a situation like this. If your house burns down, you're staying at a nice hotel.

[Pat Gray]

It's kind of the. It's why you go to work.

[Stu Burguiere]

It is the point.

[Pat Gray]

You know, you try to shield yourself from things, you know, that could happen, that are negative now. It's not. Not everybody can do it. And like, look, as we've gone through American history, America has provided more opportunities for people to do that than any place in history. And it has brought up the bottom to a place where they can survive these things better than anyone in history, in any country ever in global. Global history. So that's a positive. But of course it's. It's shown as a negative because some people have really nice hotels and others are with their family in Pasadena. There's your inequality left in its wake.

[Stu Burguiere]

It's incredible. It's really incredible. 888, 727, Beck. More patents, too, for Glenn coming up.

[Pat Gray]

Down the road where shadows hide Feel.

[Stu Burguiere]

The dark on every side Stand your.

[Pat Gray]

Ground when times get down Gotta face the dog and embrace the fire the.

[Stu Burguiere]

Fusion of entertainment and enlightenment. This is the Glenn Beck Program. Glenn will return to tomorrow. Looks like Pat and Stew today or Glenn on the Glenn Beck Program. We got to get into this Mark Zuckerberg interview. That was. It was Joe Rogan, wasn't it? Yeah, Rogan show and what he had to say about censorship from the Biden administration. Fascinating. We'll get into that in one minute.

[Pat Gray]

Well, we have so much work to do in this country to change the hearts and minds of the American people, so that it's no longer just an accepted notion that unborn life is disposable. It's going to take years and years and years, I'm sure, maybe even decades, but it is a battle that we have to engage in. Today. The abortion pill accounts for over 60% of all abortions, and it's available pretty much 24. 7. This is why the Ministry of Preborn is so important. Preborn has rescued over 300,000 babies from abortion. And every day, on average, they rescue two. When a woman considering an abortion hears her baby's heartbeat and sees that baby on ultrasound, the baby's chance at life is doubled. Preborn shares free heartbeats and God's love for mother and child. But they do need your help to do this. For just $28, cost of a dinner, you can sponsor an ultrasound to introduce a mother to her baby for the first time. 100% of your donation will go toward saving babies. Can you help? Just dial pound 250 and say the keyword baby. It's pound 250. Use the keyword baby to donate. Or you can go online as well. Preborn.com Beck preborn.com Beck. It's sponsored by preborn.

[Stu Burguiere]

Okay, so Mark Zuckerberg talking about censorship from the Biden administration. Hmm, Interesting. Here's what he had to say on Rogan's show. These people from the Biden administration would call up our team and like, scream at them and curse. And it's like these documents are. It's all kind of out there. Did you record any of those phone calls? I don't know. I don't think. I don't think we were. But. But I think I want to listen. I mean, there are emails. The emails are published.

[Pat Gray]

It's all.

[Stu Burguiere]

It's all kind of out there. We just said, no, we're not. We're not going to take down humor and satire. We're not going to take down things that are true. And then at some point, I guess, I don't know, it flipped a bit. I mean, Biden, when he was. He gave some statement at some point. I don't know if it was a press conference or to some journalists where he basically was like, these guys are killing people.

[Pat Gray]

And.

[Stu Burguiere]

I don't know. Then, like, all these different agencies and branches of government basically just like, started investigating, coming after our company. It was brilliant. Brutal.

[Pat Gray]

It was brutal.

[Stu Burguiere]

They're not going to take things down that are true. The Hunter laptop comes to mind. You did take down things that were true. And you did squash conservatives and conservative sites and hampered traffic and really shut us down for what, four years. And now all of a sudden we get this mea culpa. Okay. It's a little irritating to me. I mean, I believe that he think that's fair. I, I, yeah, I think he believes it now.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah.

[Stu Burguiere]

Where were you four years ago, Mr. Perm? Where were you four years ago? Come on.

[Pat Gray]

Yes, I think that is entirely fair. I, I, I'm a bit torn on it overall, because I, first of all, really won. I would love to have another Elon Musk on our side.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, so would I. Great.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah, that'd be great. I don't know if this is legitimate from him. It could very well be like he's just seeing the writing on the wall. He knows the next four years are going to be very Trump focused and he better get back on board. You could see that it's probably the most likely part of this.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yes.

[Pat Gray]

That being said, first of all, on that, that's not necessarily bad. One of the reasons why you win elections is for things like this to happen.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, sure.

[Pat Gray]

It's one of the reasons we organized and we all went out to vote and we did all that.

[Stu Burguiere]

I welcome it.

[Pat Gray]

Because of this. Right? Yeah. You want the pressure on these guys to be towards sanity instead of insanity. And I'm at the point now with Elon Musk that I think he's had a significant transition from where he was a while ago. Because, because just like with Zuckerberg here, I was very skeptical of the Elon Musk thing at the beginning. I don't know. This guy's been telling me nonstop about global warming and how we have to build spaceships to avoid it for the last 10 years. Why am I gonna believe that all of a sudden he's some big conservative or whatever? And I know there's splits within the conservative movement over a lot of things that Elon Musk supports, but generally speaking, I think what he's saying is real. I think he's had this transition. He really, really does believe a lot of these things. And this is how it started with him. And maybe this is the start of it with Mark Zuckerberg. Zuckerberg.

[Stu Burguiere]

I hope so.

[Pat Gray]

I hope so. But if it's not, one of the reasons you go out there and you win elections is to change the tides. The tides, during the Biden administration, particularly early, were pulling people toward Woke nonsense, Woke craziness. And all these companies were proudly touting their DEI initiatives.

[Stu Burguiere]

They sure were. And now they're Dropping.

[Pat Gray]

And now they're dropping them.

[Stu Burguiere]

Including Facebook.

[Pat Gray]

Facebook, you know, McDonald's, Walmart, like huge brands. While I think it's possible it's real with Zuckerberg on a change, I don't think it's possible that Walmart has had some big change. I don't think that's what's happened here. Walmart is just saying, like, okay, this is getting. Doing more, doing us more. More harm than it is good.

[Stu Burguiere]

Right.

[Pat Gray]

So let's switch McDonald's. There's like, why are we dealing with this? Right. Everyone told us this was gonna make us look good, and now it's pissing off more people than it's. Than it's. Than it's helping us with. So let's change it. Like, those are corporate decisions, and that's like the positive of winning an election and sending a message like that. On the other hand, it could be that Zuckerberg really is having some sort of transition, you know, which is great. It would be the best case scenario. I think it'd be great, Great to have another person in that sort of powerful position who adopts and appreciates free speech.

[Stu Burguiere]

But in the meantime, it would just be nice if they would allow free speech on Facebook.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah.

[Stu Burguiere]

Even if it's not real, Even if it's a transition only for convenience for Facebook for the next four years, that's okay, too. I'll take that, too. If you just don't, you know, stop censoring, stop squashing conservative thought. And who decides, by the way, what's true and what's not? Because there are some. There's some differing opinions on that. On.

[Pat Gray]

Really?

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

I haven't noticed that. Are there some people who are still saying that water will put out fires?

[Stu Burguiere]

There are.

[Pat Gray]

I hope they're suppressing that, because that's crazy.

[Stu Burguiere]

They should.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah. But I think that's true, Pat. And it's like, you know, you listen to the way Zuckerberg is talking. We can play some more of the clips if we want. But, like, he was talking about how. How we saw a real problem, which I think is real, at the beginning of this. I think there really was a problem that tech companies could have helped solve in some way. Like, I remember when the fake news term first started, it wasn't like, hey, people disagree on climate change, or, hey, why aren't you saying that people can transition from one gender to the other with a series of magic words? It wasn't that. It was like someone would say, look at this. This guy murdered 10 people last night. And no one's doing anything. And then you look at it and be like, this person is. I think that's Robert Downey Jr. That's not even. What do you mean? This. It was just completely fake news. People were just putting crazy stories out there that were just completely made up to get clicks. And it was something that was hurting people's online experience because they would be like, oh, my gosh, I'm outraged. They retweet it, they'd repost it. It. And it would just be like some account trying to make money on totally fake news stories. Just stuff they, like, made up. Not stuff that was politically disagreeable, just stuff that was not even political at all, just nonsense. And so they wanted to try to crack down on that. And, like, they went in the direction of fact checkers, where Twitter X and Elon Musk went in the direction of Community Notes. Notes. And Community Notes is quite clearly a better system, and it's been proven to be a better system. And now Mark Zuckerberg, who very recently was in such a blood brawl against Elon Musk that they were threatening to have a cage match against each other, is admitting that Twitter got it right and they got it wrong.

[Stu Burguiere]

It's amazing, isn't it?

[Pat Gray]

That had to be hard for him to do.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, it probably was. It probably was. And you're right. Hats off to him for that.

[Pat Gray]

That's good. But now we'll see the proofs of the pudding, right?

[Stu Burguiere]

Yes.

[Pat Gray]

He's saying these things. Like, now that he said these things, I've had several people reach out and say, like, I posted this and they took it down. And I don't even think they've implemented any of these systems yet. So I wouldn't be surprised if that stuff is still happening.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, probably.

[Pat Gray]

But we will see over the next year or two how. How loyal they are to this mission.

[Stu Burguiere]

And it just would have been nice if it would have happened four years ago.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah.

[Stu Burguiere]

You know, stand up to the government. You can't allow the government to tell you what to take off your website and what not to.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah, I honestly, the conversations with Zuckerberg, I listened to a decent amount of the Rogan one because I was curious to see how real this was.

[Stu Burguiere]

And you came away thinking it was pretty real.

[Pat Gray]

No, I wouldn't say that. I think it's possible it's real is where I am with it. The part of me that bothers me and I think might be the same thing that's bothering you is it wasn't a mea culpa it was an admission of what happened.

[Stu Burguiere]

I really screwed up for four years.

[Pat Gray]

Right.

[Stu Burguiere]

He didn't say that.

[Pat Gray]

He did say, say Twitter handled it better, which is kind of a couple, I guess, sort of. But it wasn't like, we. Wow. We. I'm really sorry for those people who.

[Stu Burguiere]

Lost their accounts, which would make it more legitimate.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah, it would.

[Stu Burguiere]

Did that.

[Pat Gray]

It was a much more of like, gosh, can you believe the government came after me? And they said they wanted to take down things that were true and we said no. Well, that's not how I remember it.

[Stu Burguiere]

No, because that's not how it happened.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah. That's why I'm sure at times they did say no. But generally speaking, they went along with this stuff for a really long time, and it pat. Destroyed people's businesses.

[Stu Burguiere]

Right.

[Pat Gray]

I gotta believe. I mean, we live in this.

[Stu Burguiere]

I gave up on Facebook because of it. I mean, they just continued to squash more and more of what we had to say on Facebook, and so I just gave up Eventually.

[Pat Gray]

Glenn's talked about this publicly, that the reach of his Facebook page is something down by something like 90 or 95%.

[Stu Burguiere]

And it was that way for all of us.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah. And they outwardly kind of told people, we want you to see your friends wedding photos, not take in news content. Now they're reversing that now, which I think, again, is good. I just don't know if it's a real commitment, because you have to have a real commitment. There are ugly things that happen when you embrace free speech. There are terrible things said on Twitter. Twitter. And it's hard to defend them. Yeah, it's hard to say, actually. Our policy is to allow that terrible speech. Our policy is to allow that terrible thing to be on the Internet. But that's the right thing to allow. Yes, you have to allow.

[Stu Burguiere]

The only kind of speech that you need to have protected is harmful or not necessarily harmful, but stuff people don't like.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah, it's easy to protect.

[Stu Burguiere]

You know, basic speech, Sunshine speech is easy. I mean, nobody has to. Nobody takes offense to it. It's the stuff that's offensive that is difficult to protect. But that's what needs to be protected.

[Pat Gray]

I think, too, Facebook has realized they're no longer relevant the way they were when they were allowing news content. Everyone, you know, people were talking about it, People were on it, they were sharing things. And I think because they decided, hey, let's make this all about, you know, your friend's new job announcement, which again, might be important to following your friend's life, of course, but it's not. It doesn't happen enough in people's lives for it to be. To make it a relevant place to go. So younger generations completely abandoned it in favor of TikTok and Snapchat.

[Stu Burguiere]

It's like MySpace.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah, same thing. It can happen to you. Facebook was able. I mean, the reason why it hasn't fully happened to Meta generally is because they keep buying all the competition. Instagram took over, but they own that. And WhatsApp, but they own that. And that's smart. Smart business. Like buying up your competitions of smart part of business. A friend of mine who's kind of a tech nerd had a theory and he was like, I think most likely it's just him kowtowing to the Trump administration, seeing the current, reading the room, which is smart to do as a business person. He's like. But I think there's a possibility that he's just kind of grown up. He is only 40 and we've. He's been in our lives so long.

[Stu Burguiere]

Wow.

[Pat Gray]

That you kind of. It kind of feels like he's been around forever.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, it does.

[Pat Gray]

But he started this thing when he was in college.

[Stu Burguiere]

Well. Well, he stole it when he was in college.

[Pat Gray]

When he was in college.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yes. So he was young when he stole it.

[Pat Gray]

He was younger when he. When he.

[Stu Burguiere]

You're right.

[Pat Gray]

He allegedly stole Facebook from the Winklevoss twins.

[Stu Burguiere]

Right.

[Pat Gray]

Who by the way, have gone on to build a totally separate billion dollar business of their own. Congratulations to them, actually. Pretty impressive guys.

[Stu Burguiere]

They are.

[Pat Gray]

They've been at the forefront of two separate revolutions.

[Stu Burguiere]

It's incredible.

[Pat Gray]

It's really incredible. Between crypto and previous Facebook. But Zuckerberg obviously built this thing into a behemoth. But he built that. His argument was. And I think there's something to this, maybe that, number one, this happened when he was very young. He was probably more likely to be pushed around by the government and pushed around by people around him telling him this is the way it should be. Number one. And number two, he sees himself as sort of this free speech libertarian guy, in his words on Rogan and these other statements, which sounds absurd to us.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, it does.

[Pat Gray]

But when you think about him being in. In this San Francisco tech bubble, he probably was the most libertarian guy around that he knew, or at least one of them. Yeah, he probably is to the right of most of the people he's been around his entire life.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah. Which is not.

[Pat Gray]

Which is not right.

[Stu Burguiere]

We are right.

[Pat Gray]

No, it's very left to us, but center Left, if that's what he is, is like a hardcore conservative in this community, with the exception of people like Musk and Peter Thiel, there's some libertarians out there and conservatives, but it's very. Is few and far between. And so the people who kind of like, hey, I think free speech, I want a platform for that, that may have been what he really saw himself as, and maybe as he's growing up and he's seeing adulthood for what it is and seeing the government for what it is and seeing these pressures as what they are and these nonsensical leftists. Maybe he's seen the light a little bit and that would be good.

[Stu Burguiere]

Possible.

[Pat Gray]

I mean, we can see it's possible to look at this in a positive way. Right? It's an option. It's out there.

[Stu Burguiere]

More coming up in one minute.

[Pat Gray]

We don't usually take it, but it's out there. It's an option. Glenn's been telling you for years that precious metals are the best way he knows to build a hedge against economic chaos and insanity. He'll tell you that because he truly believes it. He's been doing it for a very long time in his own life. Here's an action you can take today. As you think about that, Pick up the phone today. Call Lear Capital. Their number is 800-957-GOLD. That's easy enough to remember. 800, 957-GOLD. Ask them about investing in gold, which some people are saying is headed to $4,400 an ounce. Ask them about investing in silver, which is in short supply at the moment. These are not things that are going to go down in value, at least permanently. They're steadily rising. They've been doing very well. You need to look into this and understand the risks and, and rewards of this. But it's been quite a rewarding pursuit for a long time. You can have just some percentage of your portfolio in precious metals. It'll help you hedge all this insanity. But also, you know, you do your own homework, find out what's right for you and your family. Call lear today at 800-957-Gold for your free Gold membership Gold ownership kit as well. And you know, you get the special report, it's $4,400 gold ahead. When you call, ask how you can get up to $15,000 in bonus gold with a qualifying purchase. Pretty impressive. Check it out. 800-957-Gold. 800, 957-Gold. 800-957-Gold for Lear Capital. 10 seconds. Station ID.

[Stu Burguiere]

You know, just to give credit where credit is due. Do to Mark Zuckerberg. He did steal it, allegedly from the Winklevoss twins. Okay. At Harvard.

[Pat Gray]

Yes.

[Stu Burguiere]

But you know what? He had some real business acumen to. He. Had I stolen it, I wouldn't have really known what to do with it.

[Pat Gray]

No, I don't think so. Really would have taken off.

[Stu Burguiere]

No, I don't think so. But he turned it into a multi billion dollar business. And there's something to that. You know, same with Bill Gates.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah.

[Stu Burguiere]

Bill Gates stole everything he ever had from. From Xerox and IBM and turned it into a multi billion dollar business. So they're, you know, they're good businessmen.

[Pat Gray]

I remember thinking when he was offered, I don't know, something like three or four billion dollars for Facebook, I remember that we were on the air together, I think, talking about that.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yep.

[Pat Gray]

And I remember thinking this. He's insane.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

Why would you take that? He turned it down. And the reason he turned it down was he wanted to build what he wanted to build, which again, kind of plays into what he's talking about now. At the time, I thought it was insane because it could have been my space. Space in six months and gone.

[Stu Burguiere]

Right.

[Pat Gray]

And be zero dollars. And this has happened to a lot of people since. Yeah. But he bet on himself and it worked out. And. And to say he had nothing to do with it because I, you know, I think the Winklevoss twins got kind of the. Got the shaft a little bit in the initial treatment of the Facebook story. They were kind of like dopey frat brothers who had nothing to, you know, they just had this stupid idea.

[Stu Burguiere]

And Zuckerberg, the movie that kind of presented it that way. And I think that's become the reality.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah. The Social Network.

[Stu Burguiere]

Social Network.

[Pat Gray]

Now that's. That's based on a book called the. I think it's called the Accidental Billionaires by Ben Mezrich. And what's interesting is he wrote another book later on called Bitcoin Billionaires, I think it's called. It's something like that. And it's about the Winklevoss twins, basically after the Facebook fiasco.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah. And what are they worth, 65 billion.

[Pat Gray]

Now or something insane. They bought really, really low. They saw the bitcoin thing come in really, really early. Early. And they built a huge company based on Gemini, but also just bought a ton of bitcoin. And we're trying to. Going around the world. When all the fallout from the Facebook thing was happening, they were doing bitcoin stuff and no one was paying attention to it because who the hell. It was like $10 at the time. They helped build this thing. Saw it very, very early. And his book about the Winklevoss twins, the bitcoin one, is way more positive on them. Like it basically he kind of says, like, I saw them as sort of a joke in this first book and then I saw them and really understood what they were doing. And now I'm really, really impressed by them.

[Stu Burguiere]

Interesting.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah. I mean, it kind of turned me around on it because I kind of thought, oh God, they like to row. I remember that from the movie. They were rowing all the time. They were kind of goofy twins. Right? Like that's how you thought. And I got a totally like the wrong read, I think, on them. It's not all about rowing.

[Stu Burguiere]

No, it's. It wasn't all about rowing.

[Pat Gray]

No. You don't make a billion dollars rowing. There's very few professional rowers who have maintained that kind of fortune.

[Stu Burguiere]

So that's really true. Except in Norway. I think there's a lot of billionaire rowers in Norway filled with them, but not here.

[Pat Gray]

Filled with Norway's. Filled with.

[Stu Burguiere]

This is Glenn Beck.

[Pat Gray]

NMLS 182334 nmlsconsumeraccess.org APR for rates in the five starts at 6.799% for well qualified borrowers. Call 800-906-2440 for details about credit costs and terms. I will. Whether you're one of the people who, you know, get into New Year's resolutions or not, you probably at least feel the urge at the beginning of the new year to make some plans this year, maybe try to fill in the blank a little bit. If you're smart, and of course you are, you're listening to this program. One of the things you plan to do to get out of debt this year, maybe you're looking at your high interest debts, maybe you're looking at things like credit cards for that, you really need to give American financing a call and see what your options are. They're working for you really, and not the bank. Last year, their salary based mortgage consultants help customers save an average of $800 a month. Imagine giving yourself an $800 check every month, a $10,000 a year raise. That's heck of a way to start the new year. If you start today, you may be able to delay up to two mortgage payments, which is kind of nice in and of itself. Itself, it really can be. So don't take my word for it. Do your own Homework. Call American Financing, 800-906-24408, 009062440 or go to american financing.net it's american financing.net don't.

[Stu Burguiere]

Forget to use a promo code. Glenn. G L e n n for 24 $20 off your subscription at blazetv.com glass it's pat and Stu for Glenn today. He should be back tomorrow. Meantime, Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona says that Tick Tock will likely go dark in the United States next weekend. Wow. They're gonna shut it down. Is that what that means? Are they gonna just turn off Tick Tock in the United States?

[Pat Gray]

First of all, I hope they do.

[Stu Burguiere]

I'd love.

[Pat Gray]

Because it's just so annoying.

[Stu Burguiere]

I know it is.

[Pat Gray]

That's separate from what is reality.

[Stu Burguiere]

And that's not going to happen. Right?

[Pat Gray]

No, I. I don't. That's a terrible way of describing dark.

[Stu Burguiere]

Sounds like, okay, it's just gone. Right. It, like, disappears from your phone or your iPad.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah. Like, I think that's. That's the impression I would have of it. Right. Like, if you told me that, I would think, I'm going to look down at my phone, which, by the way, it's going to look exactly the same as it does now, which is without the TikTok app.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

But in theory, you'd look down at your phone if you had TikTok and you'd look down at it, it would not be there. Or you'd click on it and it would not operate. It would just be a blank screen. Right. That's what I would take from Kelly's description.

[Stu Burguiere]

That's what it sounds like of this.

[Pat Gray]

But it's not at all what's gonna happen now if it goes through again. This is the law. You could still see some more challenges popping up.

[Stu Burguiere]

Shockingly, and probably will.

[Pat Gray]

The Chinese Communist Party does not necessarily want to give up control of all the minds of our children.

[Stu Burguiere]

They were supposed to have to sell it to an American. Right. And that American would have control over all our children's minds.

[Pat Gray]

Right. Which is so much better.

[Stu Burguiere]

So much better.

[Pat Gray]

Especially because surely China can't find one American who would buy it and then just agree with them.

[Stu Burguiere]

Not out of 339 million people.

[Pat Gray]

No. No way could they find someone. Because it's funny, we're finding we're electing people to be President of the United States that are super friendly with China, as we did in 2020.

[Stu Burguiere]

Well, if they were giving you $10 billion, you'd be pretty friendly to her.

[Pat Gray]

Oh my gosh. I would just sell this country. 10 million, 20 bucks. Just sell to sell this country right down the river to the Chinese Communist Party. It's funny, a lot of parents are doing it for free.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

They're just like, hey, take my child's brain. Why don't you manage their thoughts and aspirations instead of me? I don't think TikTok is a good thing. I don't think it is the type of thing that is going to benefits the country at all. I wish it was never invented. I can't believe how many homes it's in. Right. I can't believe it.

[Stu Burguiere]

Because it's what, 350 million subscribers or something like that.

[Pat Gray]

It's massive.

[Stu Burguiere]

It's huge.

[Pat Gray]

If it's not the biggest, it's right up there is one of the biggest apps and especially for younger kids who are on it all the time. And honestly, there is a real national security risk with letting the Chinese government run your kids lives. That's not necessarily a good policy. One we might want to rethink going forward. But secondarily, it's just so terrible for their attention spans. It's so terrible for their brain. It's just brain rot. It's just not. I mean, that's not to say there's nothing good on it. Like, you know, there are occasionally things, you know, I see them played from time to time on other social media platforms like, I don't know, good recipes or, I mean, there's people that do productive things with it.

[Stu Burguiere]

I'm always looking for a good recipe too. I guess I should probably, I should probably subscribe and download the app.

[Pat Gray]

You're a big recipe guy.

[Stu Burguiere]

Big, big recipe guy. Huge. You're Chef Pat, we call you A good recipe.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah. You're always in that kitchen after the show, just baking up, you know, a nice bisque.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yep.

[Pat Gray]

Or maybe a lot of times a gumbo of sorts.

[Stu Burguiere]

And new recipe for festival under glass. I'm always on the lookout.

[Pat Gray]

It's weird.

[Stu Burguiere]

Always a lot of people are going.

[Pat Gray]

In there like microwaving cheeseburgers and you're like, no, you go for the whole thing.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

So I mean, but you know, people like, they have stuff like, you know, interior design or like life hacks. I mean, there's stuff that's of value on it, but of course they could find that anywhere. You can find that. There's Instagram, every other freaking social media. As you point out with Mark Zuckerberg, who allegedly stole Facebook at the beginning. He's also allegedly smoked, stole The Snapchat chat with. He sold X with threads he allegedly stole, you know, Tick Tock with reels. This stuff is available on 50 other things not controlled by the, by the Communist Party of China.

[Stu Burguiere]

Right.

[Pat Gray]

So, but taking all that out for a second, what's actually going to happen with Tick Tock, basically what they're going to do is it's not going to disappear from your phone, it's not going to go. It's not going to stop working. It is basically the way the law is written is the app stores can no longer offer it as an app, so no new people could get on it in the App Store. Now my understanding is you could probably just go to the website. I don't know how they're stopping that. But you can't go to the App Store, which is of course how most people use TikTok. So you can't go to the App Store and download it as a new app. Once this goes through, if it goes through, and secondarily, clearly there won't be any more, there won't be any updates from TikTok. So if Apple releases a new iOS, right. And they need new requirements in there, your TikTok app might not work anymore like the way it's supposed to if.

[Stu Burguiere]

You download the new. The update from Apple.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah. Like once you get the new software, it's not going to work as well.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

Now you might be able to avoid that for a while. If you remember flight, Flappy Bird. Remember this story from years ago, Flappy Bird. It was a game that came out, super simple game where you just have to go in between pipes. Your bird would have to. And you'd keep tapping the screen and your bird would kind of go up and you have to go in between these pipes. It was a really stupid game. It was very, very hard, very difficult. And it was created by some guy, I don't know in some place that I never want to visit. And he wanted to do it and people got really addicted to it and became super popular, went to the top of the chart and he decided in the middle of the viral craziness that he thought it was becoming a bad influence on people. People were playing it too much and he decided he didn't want it. So he took it down, just on his own, took it down from the App Store. And so if you had it on your phone already, you could keep playing it for as long as you wanted until. Until the updates made it irrelevant or something. But it was still there. If you deleted it, you couldn't Redownload it though. And that would be the same with TikTok. If you delete the thing, you're not gonna be to redownload it. If all this stuff happens, which it may not, it may not, they may find some last minute legal reprieve. They may, they've gone through a lot of their options though. It does seem like this is going to happen. And you know, I don't know. Look, fewer people being on this is good for America in every way imaginable and it might be bad for certain influencers. And I do think that is, that really sucks. Like if you, if you built a business, you know, you build a business on 10 million followers on TikTok, they probably have been smart enough to go over to Instagram and probably have built a good business over there or wherever else too, to shield yourself, but maybe not. And you know, if you're making all of your money from TikTok, this is pretty rough on you. And I don't generally like the idea of the government coming in and banning.

[Stu Burguiere]

Things after people either, but this is a little bit different.

[Pat Gray]

I do think the national security risks are pretty high on this one.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah. And it's coming from the ccp. That's an issue, that's a problem.

[Pat Gray]

And there's all sorts of evidence that they are looking at this, that they are influencing what kind of content. Content comes to. To. To us. Like, yeah, they are intention. Like you look at the stuff that comes first of all, they don't let Tick tock into China. Tells you kind of a little bit Tick tock. You cannot get it in China.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, it's amazing because they know how.

[Pat Gray]

Bad it is for people. They know how terrible it is for a society. They're poisoning us instead. And so that's a terrible, terrible idea. But it's not going away. Again, Reals is doing the exact same thing. The hope is that with an American force behind it, an American mindset behind it, at least they're not intentionally seeding chaos. At least they're not intentionally trying to put harmful things into the American population, which I do think China is actively doing. I think that's actually happening. Happening.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, I think there's plenty of evidence to back that up. Also, how good will it be for America if we take over Greenland? I think it'd be really good. I'm not, I'm not sure we should just do it.

[Pat Gray]

No.

[Stu Burguiere]

The President, to be the president elect didn't rule out military intervention. I think that's just part of his negotiation process. I Don't think we would actually invade Greenland and take it over militarily. But I do think he's serious about trying to acquire it from. From the Dutch.

[Pat Gray]

I think that's real.

[Stu Burguiere]

If he. I think it's real.

[Pat Gray]

If it was possible, he would do it.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, I think. And Denmark is saying now they're apparently open to discussing a more prominent role for the U.S. they say they don't want to sell it outright to us, but they're willing to talk about sharing it, which I think is pretty interesting. They're trying to avoid a public dispute with the incoming Trump administration, though, and they've sent messages to Trump officials offering a discussion on a new partnership regarding Greenland's future. That's interesting.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah. I mean, this is probably really what Trump is going for. He probably doesn't think he can buy it outright, but wants to get a stronger foothold there, doesn't want China to get a stronger foothold there, and is negotiating. This is why he does it. Whether you like it or not, I will say this. He's able to get people talking. And this is the most fascinating thing about Trump is just how he can come up with this idea that no one's talking about and wrestle the entire attention of the United States toward it. It's incredible. The New York Times even wrote a piece. The headline was, how Much Would Buying Greenland Cost? Which is a great one. I did this experiment with one of the AI services and asked it, how much would Greenland cost? It came up with something like, it could be anywhere from 50 billion to 1 trillion. And Glenn's like, a trillion. I'd do that in a second. Let's do it. We spend a trillion dollars on nothing all the time. Let's go out in there and get Greenland. Greenland as big. It's as big as the Eastern Seaboard of the United States.

[Stu Burguiere]

It's gigantic.

[Pat Gray]

Really big. It looks bigger than it actually is on the map, but it is still really, really big, even when you look at the proper perspective.

[Stu Burguiere]

It's got a lot of precious minerals.

[Pat Gray]

Yep. It has a lot of stuff there that would be fun to have. The strategic positioning is really important. However, the New York Times asked expert David Barker, he's a real estate developer, former economist at the New York Fed, how much should it cost? He had, at one point, had talked about. He was, I guess, famous previously. Back in 2009, he argued that the American purchase of Alaska in 1867 for less than 2 cents per acre was a bad deal from a purely financial investment perspective.

[Stu Burguiere]

You think? Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

That's fascinating. I don't know. I think it was a good buy. I feel like 2 cents an acre was the right price. But he says a background back of the napkin math for valuing Greenland, which he bases on the purchase of the Virgin Islands. Basically projecting that in the future. Looking at the changes of GDP going through all of this, they have the whole analysis in here, but bottom line, at the end of it comes out between 12.5 billion and 77 billion.

[Stu Burguiere]

Oh, come on.

[Pat Gray]

I'd pull the trigger on that in a week immediately. I might see if I can get a mortgage for that just personally. Let's see, can we get American financing on the phone, see if they'll give us 12.5 billion. Between Pat, Stew and Glenn, maybe we can pull this thing off. I don't know. Probably be a high rate.

[Stu Burguiere]

I mean, you can't, you can't pass that up.

[Pat Gray]

There's no, first of all, no way would they take 12 billion. Imagine that they're like, yeah, 12 billion.

[Stu Burguiere]

Let's say it's 100 billion. Let's say it's 500 billion.

[Pat Gray]

Yes.

[Stu Burguiere]

Wouldn't that be worth it? It would be worth it. And Denmark would really benefit from $500 billion. I don't know what their GDP is, but it can't be be too much more than that.

[Pat Gray]

Do you know the number off the top of your head how much money we've given Ukraine? I don't know it off the top of my head, but it's a lot.

[Stu Burguiere]

According to some sources is like 250 billion.

[Pat Gray]

I mean, that's like several.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

Even at the high number of 77 billion.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

I mean, I am all in at that price. And I think like, you know, you kind of look at it like a baseball free. Right now, my America's team, the Toronto Blue Jays, are trying to sell sign my son's favorite player, Vladimir Guerrero Jr. To a long term contract. And they negotiate. I think the Blue jays have offered $340 million and he wants 450. I think it's 10 years and he wants 450. And it's like, guys, nobody wants to come to your team. You live in Canada. No one wants to freaking deal with customs for every home trip. No one wants to go up there and pay Trudeau's tax rate. What you need to do to get a player of his caliber is pay a premium. If he wants $450 million, call him tomorrow and tell him you have $451 million and you're ready to sign. It right now. The same thing with this same thing with Greenland. Is there a possibility of just blowing them away? With how much money we offer? If they really only want $77 billion.

[Stu Burguiere]

Offer them a trillion. See if they'll take it.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah, but start a little lower. But, but maybe start 500 billion. Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know it'd be worth. It'd be a worthwhile purchase. At least it would be something. We're just, we're taking our money right now and making it explode in Russia.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yep.

[Pat Gray]

I mean at least we get something serious out of it.

[Stu Burguiere]

Triple 890-04-8727 Beck. More coming up.

[Pat Gray]

All right. It's not bad enough that identity theft can rob you of your money. It can be terrible on your credit score. It can ruin your credibility in the process. Now there are a lot of things you can do to protect yourself. But you know, you gotta really watch what you're doing. You gotta look for comprehensive identity protection from cyber criminals. Not to mention real peace of mind. Where do you get that? How about LifeLock? It's important to understand how cybercrime and identity theft are affecting our lives. Lifelock offers advanced empowering monitoring of your identity and and personal information. It alerts you to cybercriminals trying to use your personal information tracking hundreds of millions of data points per second to detect and alert you to a wide range of threats. They have professional dedicated US based restoration specialists. And if you become a victim of identity theft, they can help you manage and fix the situation. Their plans include up to $3 million in coverage. It's easy to protect your yourself with LifeLock. Join now and save up to 40% off your first year with the promo code BECK. Call 1-800-LIFELOCK or head to lifelock.com use the promo code BECK. For 40% off. It's lifelock.com. the promo code is. Beck.

[Stu Burguiere]

Beck. We'll be right back. Pat and Stu for Glenn today. Triple 8900 or 808727 Beck. And we're just looking up the, the GDP of Denmark. Who has the rights right now to green Greenland. Their GDP is $404.2 billion last year. 404.2. We could easily.

[Pat Gray]

Oh my God.

[Stu Burguiere]

Here's a. Here's a year's gross domestic product for you.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah, for Greenland I'm looking at. Yeah. The US GDP is 27.36 trillion. I mean is there anything we wouldn't sell for 27.36 trillion?

[Stu Burguiere]

I don't think so. So maybe not. Texas maybe. You don't sell California or Texas for that.

[Pat Gray]

Well, California, I mean probably something inside the contiguous United States, but I selling Alaska and a second for that.

[Stu Burguiere]

For 27 trillion.

[Pat Gray]

You want Guam. We'll throw in the Virgin Islands. What do you want? Yes, what do you need for 27.36 trillion? I'm in.

[Stu Burguiere]

You could almost pay off the debt for that.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah, Yeah. I mean that would be massive. Imagine what Denmark. I mean got to be tempting for $404 billion.

[Stu Burguiere]

Seriously. I would think it would be.

[Pat Gray]

And like maybe get keep a percentage of like mineral rights or something like so you get ongoing revenue. They should totally sell us this. What's going on? Why aren't they doing it? Denmark stupid for not doing it.

[Stu Burguiere]

This is Glenn.

[Pat Gray]

Becky. Down the road where shadows hide Feel the dark on every side Stand your ground when times get down Gotta face the dog and embrace the fire.

[Stu Burguiere]

The fusion of entertainment and enlightenment. This is the Glenn Beck program. Isn't it though? Welcome to it. It's Patton Stu for Glenn today. Triple 8727 Beck. The Joe Biden I told you so tour has already begun. And will Donald Trump finally put a stop to switching our clocks twice a year? That could happen. Seems to have a little momentum. We'll get into that. Lots more coming up in 60 seconds.

[Pat Gray]

If keeping your family and your property safe is high on your priorities list, and I'm sure it is, you're gonna want to get simply safe. Because they don't just react to break ins the way a lot of security systems do. They actually work to stop them before they even begin. Simplisafe offers advanced state of the art home security and 24,7 monitoring plans for around a dollar a day. It's an incredible price when you think about it. And with their live guard protection and fast protect monitoring, Simplisafe can act on an alarm within five seconds. Even talk to the intruder. That'll be an interesting conversation over here. Their exclusive active guard outdoor protection uses AI powered cameras which are backed by live monitoring against who will ever keep coming over your property. Whatever you want to see, you'll see it. With Simplisafe there are no long term contracts and it's easy to set up yourself. Or they'll do it for you if you need that. Plus there's a 60 day satisfaction guarantee so you can try it risk free. Start with the new year and the greater peace of [e-mail] Beck Claim 50 50% off new system with professional monitoring and your first month is free. By the way, as well. Simplisafe.com Beck simplisafe.com Beck there's no safe like Simplisafe.

[Stu Burguiere]

So Joe Biden says that he believes he would have won the election had he stayed in it. Now, he could have done that.

[Pat Gray]

Well, yeah, but what. How? He couldn't have because he had to leave. They told him he had to leave. So Nancy Pelosi said.

[Stu Burguiere]

What'd she say?

[Pat Gray]

You can't stay anymore.

[Stu Burguiere]

Oh.

[Pat Gray]

Because you're. You're not. We don't want you to be the candidate. So then he, as the most powerful person in the world, needed to fold to her demands.

[Stu Burguiere]

Right? Right. Doesn't make a lot of sense, does it?

[Pat Gray]

No, not really.

[Stu Burguiere]

Frankly, I don't believe he would have won. I think he would have lost by more than Kamala did. But he could have stayed in the race if he really thought he had a great chance to win.

[Pat Gray]

I tend to think that's true. I think she probably did do better than he would have done. However, I will say what a. I mean, I would say it would be a lifetime of regret, though there's. Unfortunately for Joe, at his age, maybe not all that much time to regret it. That being said, you know, he won the primary, Pat.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

I don't know if people remember this.

[Stu Burguiere]

At least 14 million people voted for him. That was 14 million million people more than voted for Kamala Harris. So that seems to be somewhat significant.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah. I mean, think about this. His entire life. This is why I was relatively convinced, even at the heights of these pressures, that he was, like, not gonna. At the end of the day, he's not gonna give this up. He ran for Senate when he was younger than the allowed age. His first run.

[Stu Burguiere]

Right.

[Pat Gray]

He had to turn. Was it 30? Had to turn 30 so that he could be allowed into the Senate after he was elected.

[Stu Burguiere]

After the election.

[Pat Gray]

Right. He is wanted.

[Stu Burguiere]

His birthday is November 20th. Obviously, the election was held before that.

[Pat Gray]

Right. And then that was 1972. If I'm getting my years right. It's been a while, but I think it was 1972. I think it was then just 16 years later, which again, is only is less than three terms. He's already running for president. That's how fast he went. Now, that's not Barack Obama fat, but that's fast. He was not an old gentleman running for president in 1988, then had that campaign blow up over the plagiarism scandal, then waited another 20 years, stayed in the Senate that entire time, waited another 20 years, ran again.

[Stu Burguiere]

Again.

[Pat Gray]

Was embarrassed.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yep.

[Pat Gray]

And somehow Barack Obama resurrected his political career and gave him the vice presidency. Largely because, in Barack Obama's own words and widely reported because he was white and he didn't think that the American people could accept two exotics. Was the quote, exotics on the ticket. They couldn't handle it. They had to have at least one white person on there. And they needed someone who was white and old is what he wanted.

[Stu Burguiere]

Because someone who was a. Apparently a racist who had said things like this.

[Pat Gray]

I mean, you got the first sort of mainstream freaking American. Yeah. Who is articulate and bright and. And clean.

[Stu Burguiere]

Nice looking guy. Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

I mean, this. That's a storybook.

[Stu Burguiere]

He actually took us a shower from time to time. This guy that really actually took a shower.

[Pat Gray]

Can you imagine? American.

[Stu Burguiere]

It's a storybook.

[Pat Gray]

It's a storybook. It's basically.

[Stu Burguiere]

It doesn't happen. It's a fairy tale, essentially.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah. It's right off a novel. You know, you just.

[Stu Burguiere]

It's incredible. We forget sometimes. That was 2008.

[Pat Gray]

How was that said?

[Stu Burguiere]

I don't know.

[Pat Gray]

How was something like that said?

[Stu Burguiere]

I don't know. And he survived it.

[Pat Gray]

And he survived it. And that guy, he was saying it about. And this might. Now that I'm thinking about it, maybe this is a requirement of becoming the Democratic vice presidential nominee. Because the same thing happened with Kamala. Kamala called Biden racist, and then she got the gig. Maybe this is what you're supposed to do. You have to call the top of the ticket racist. And then they feel so bad about it that they have to come back to you and say, well, you know.

[Stu Burguiere]

Why don't you join me?

[Pat Gray]

Yeah. This is like the ultimate thing. Join me, because it proves that I can get those racist votes. And that's really what Barack Obama was doing with Biden, was he believed the American people were racist. This is the. If you go back to his comments on the Pennsylvania radio station. People clinging to their gods and their guns. The people clinging to the. I can't remember the word he used, but it was basically the dislike for people who didn't look like them. That's how he saw the people of America. But it's gonna be hard enough for them to get over a name like Barack Obama, a weird name, a funny name, as he called. Called it, and someone with dark skin to elect them. The only way they'll do it is if you have a really boring old white guy on the ticket. And that's why Joe Biden got the gig in the first place, his career is resurrected. Then again, he has an opportunity in 2016 to run against Donald Trump, a guy he thinks he can. Absolutely. He doesn't know it's Trump at the time when he makes the decision to not run, but he believes he can beat anybody in that Republican field. He has the death of his son he's dealing with, and Barack Obama comes to him and tells him, joey, don't do it. And he doesn't do it. Hillary Clinton runs and loses to Trump. So he sees this as a major mistake in his life of not running. He should have done it. Comes back in 20, 20 runs, is absolutely toast in that campaign. What did he finish, like, seventh in New Hampshire? I mean, he was way down the list.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, he was.

[Pat Gray]

I don't remember exactly what it was, but he was a disaster in both.

[Stu Burguiere]

James Clyburn saved him.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah, Clyburn saved him in South Carolina after he had lost all the previous opportunities. He then turns it all around, and who knows what would have happened if Covid didn't happen, because basically they just kind of ended the campaign. Sanders, who obviously kept challenging Clinton forever, basically gave up because they couldn't really have elections at that time. This is like peak lockdown period. So they stopped the campaign. He gets the presidency. He gets in there. He has four years, he wins the primary to run again, and then they take it away from him. I still to this day, can't believe he gave it up.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

Why would he live? Why would you care what Nancy Pelosi or Barack Obama say about your presidency? Who cares what they say? Just stick with it.

[Stu Burguiere]

Unless they're really the ones in charge.

[Pat Gray]

I guess that's the truth, right? I guess at some level, because it made no sense for him to give it up.

[Stu Burguiere]

It didn't. No, it didn't.

[Pat Gray]

Something he wanted his entire life and had. And then he won the primary, and then he gave up the presidency. Really. For no reason. Because at the end of the day, yes, he would have lost, but so did she. And maybe he would have lost worse. But I think in your own mind, it's hard to convince yourself of that, right? I think in your own mind, you're probably like, I can do this. I beat this guy last time.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

You know, I think that's in your head.

[Stu Burguiere]

He had an interesting answer to the question, though. Would you have. Have. What was the. It was something like, would you have survived the. The entire four years? It was like, are you gonna live? Are you gonna be alive the whole time? Who knows? Was his answer. Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

Not. Not confidence.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah. So who knows? Who knows? And maybe that. Maybe that figured into his decision.

[Pat Gray]

I don't think so. He had already won the primary pack.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, yeah.

[Pat Gray]

He'd already come.

[Stu Burguiere]

You know, he already made the decision that he was gonna. He was gonna be there for another four years.

[Pat Gray]

And like. And like, we can look at this world the way it is now, where the media turned on him, they pressured him, they tried to get him out because they thought he had no chance of winning, which is probably true. And they thought Kamala did have a chance of winning, which is actually arguably true, too. She was in a position where she was leading in the polls at one point. It was a close election. We look back at it, and we think there was seven swing states, and Trump won them all. Therefore, it was a blowout. But really, I mean, she needed to win three blue wall states, which she didn't win. The biggest blowout of those three states was 2 points. Again, Trump needed to win one of those states. The biggest blowout was two points. It was not that big of a margin. So at the end of the day, you think he's thinking he could have won that. And I do think if he had stayed, the media would have figured out a way to say, you know what? What? Actually, maybe he is sharper than we ever thought. They would have come back around. It would have been absurd, and I don't think the American people would have bought it, but they would have come up with arguments as to why, yes, you should elect this person we were telling you was completely incompetent. Just three weeks ago, they would have done it. Yeah, they would have turned around and they would have figured out ways to.

[Stu Burguiere]

Support him just based on their Trump hatred. That would have happened.

[Pat Gray]

Yep. They would have just lied, just like they were lying. And every day up until that time debate, they would have switched back and they would have found suddenly some doctor who says, actually, what we've discovered is he's. The reason why he seems to stumble is because he's so much smarter than everyone else. He's got nine thoughts going on at the same time. He solved. He told you he's gonna cure cancer. He only needs one more term to do that. By the way, has Joe Biden cured cancer.com? has Joe Biden cured.

[Stu Burguiere]

Well, I'm sure by now he has. Right. Because he's only got a week left.

[Pat Gray]

Come. I'm nervous.

[Stu Burguiere]

It's one week from today. He's out of office, so he's got this week left.

[Pat Gray]

Oh, God. I. Bad news.

[Stu Burguiere]

Oh, no.

[Pat Gray]

Has Joe Biden cured cancer.com? the answer no. Cancer still exists as of Monday, January 13th. That's terrible news. He's only got a week. I hope he's got some. He does have some speeches scheduled for this week.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah. Okay, so we're gonna announce the new cure. Maybe one of them is announcing the new cure.

[Pat Gray]

That would be nice. You know, he should have done that before the election. Cause I think think he.

[Stu Burguiere]

He would have helped.

[Pat Gray]

He would have won if he cured cancer.

[Stu Burguiere]

I think voted for him had he cured cancer.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah, you know, that would be quite the accomplishment.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, that's a. That's a big accomplishment. All right. Triple eight, seven, two, seven. Beck. More coming up in one minute.

[Pat Gray]

All right. What's your dog having for dinner tonight? A thick, juicy steak with a side of mashed potatoes and gravy. Maybe some steamed broccoli on the side if you want to add a little health food to the meal. Eh, maybe not. He's probably eating the same old kibble that he's always been eating. And that's great and all, you know, I'm afraid he's gonna miss a lot of key nutrients, though, if you keep feeding him that way. Fortunately, there's rough greens. It's a supplement created by naturopathic doctor Dennis Black specifically to make your pet healthier. You sprinkle on a little of the rough greens on your pet food. It's got the vitamins, the probiotics, the enzymes, the omega oils, everything your dog needs. If it's healthy for your dog, it's probably in Rough greens already. Improve your pet's coat, it can improve your pet's digestion energy. Have fewer vet bills. Let 20, 25 bring in a new year and maybe a new pet. Try it right now. Jumpstart trial right now. 20 bucks the way it normally is. Right now you can get it for free with the promo code. Glenn. Just cover the shipping. Resolve to provide your pets food with what has been missing. Missing with Ruff Greens. R U F F Greens. The free Jumpstart trial bag is going on now. Ruffgreens.com use the promo code Glenn. Rough Greens promo code is Glenn. It's Rough Greens so good your pet will ask for it by name. 10 seconds. Station ID that eagle noise you'll notice in there. Yeah, yeah. Just a reminder that the Eagles defeated the Green Bay packers yesterday. That's just your reminder.

[Stu Burguiere]

Thanks for that reminder.

[Pat Gray]

You're welcome.

[Stu Burguiere]

Really important.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah. Well, as a Packer fan, I want to make sure. And now You've been reminded each time you hear that soaring eagle make a little. A little noise here on the program, you can be reminded of that.

[Stu Burguiere]

I've already made the shift in my mind. I'm now. I'm now rooting for the Buffalo Bills.

[Pat Gray]

Oh, really?

[Stu Burguiere]

And the Buffalo Bills. I think I'd like to see the Bills win.

[Pat Gray]

I mean, it would be nice for them to get one.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, you know, it'd be nice.

[Pat Gray]

It would be nice for them to get one. I love the Buffalo fans. They're kind of awesome. They will power through anything like.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

Again, any kind of weather. Eagles. I think I'm with you on that. I'm trying to think off the top of my head if that's true. And certainly don't want the commanders to win. Oh, don't want the Rams. The Vikings are another one who are in that same sort of boat. They've never had one.

[Stu Burguiere]

Never had one. They've been there, but they've never won.

[Pat Gray]

Never won. So that's tough. Of course, the Bills have been. No, wait a minute. No, wait a minute. The Texans have never been there. It's got to be the Lions, I think, for me.

[Stu Burguiere]

Really? Oh, okay.

[Pat Gray]

I got to say, I've never even been there.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yes, that's true. And neither have the Texans.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah. The Texans, of course, are new. Newish. However, that's not a surprise.

[Stu Burguiere]

Houston's franchise has never been to the Super Bowl. Oilers or Texans. Yeah, never been.

[Pat Gray]

So they've been. I guess that they. A lot of teams here.

[Stu Burguiere]

This is.

[Pat Gray]

This is crazy. The Eagles are the veterans. I felt like they never won the super bowl forever. Now they've got one.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

And this year you're right. Gosh. So the one, I think now, other than Glenn, who's normally sitting in your chair. Pat. The Chiefs. If you're not a Chiefs fan, it's kind of tough to. I mean, they've been so good. No, I don't think I want that happening again. I can't see that.

[Stu Burguiere]

I mean, Glenn wants the Chiefs.

[Pat Gray]

He's become a Chiefs fan.

[Stu Burguiere]

Is that because of. Of Andy Reid?

[Pat Gray]

I think it's Andy Reid mainly. You know, And I will say, like, for a while, it was just Glenn sort of like liking Andy Reid generally and wanting to torture me because they. They beat the Eagles.

[Stu Burguiere]

Right.

[Pat Gray]

There was some of that going on. I think he's actually kind of turned into a football fan a little bit. He actually watches football now. No, it's weird. He brings up points and they're, like, coherent.

[Stu Burguiere]

No.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah, it's weird, man.

[Stu Burguiere]

It is weird.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah. You should have him on to just talk football one morning. He's supposed to be back tomorrow. We hope he's recovering from something. But you should have him on one morning just to talk. Just talk sports. I will say it's not going to be the most in depth football conversation you've ever had. I'm sure. But like, he'll make observations that you can tell what he's talking about now.

[Stu Burguiere]

Seriously?

[Pat Gray]

Yeah. You're like, oh, yeah, I saw that, I saw that. Like you used the right term for that particular play.

[Stu Burguiere]

Like it's no way. Yeah, okay. I'm gonna have to hear it to believe it.

[Pat Gray]

It's getting better. I'm not gonna say he's mastered it, but it's getting a lot better.

[Stu Burguiere]

Okay.

[Pat Gray]

Impressive.

[Stu Burguiere]

All right, so what do you think of the daylight savings time becoming permanent so we never switch back to standard time? What I would prefer is standard time and never switch to daylight saving time.

[Pat Gray]

Why?

[Stu Burguiere]

But I take either one of them.

[Pat Gray]

Just.

[Stu Burguiere]

You just. I, I just prefer for standard time because then you don't have. It doesn't stay light during the summer until like 10:00 in the north and 9:00 in the south.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah. I will say, as a parent, I noticed that. I noticed that difference. Because your kid doesn't want to go to bed.

[Stu Burguiere]

No. Right.

[Pat Gray]

When it's bright light outside, Right. They're like, why am I going to bed? And you're like, okay, you're six, you need to go to bed.

[Stu Burguiere]

During the, during the summer, when I'm still working, I have to go to bed when it's light, you know, because I get up at 3 in the morning, so it's still very light outside when I go to bed.

[Pat Gray]

That's gotta be hell. 3:00 in the morning you get up. Good. I mean, I know your show starts Pat Grey Unleashed, by the way, on Belize tv. You should check that out, watch it, subscribe to the podcast. But you don't have to to hear the podcast. You don't have to get up at 3 in the morning. You know, you listen to it when you want to listen to it, right?

[Stu Burguiere]

Yes.

[Pat Gray]

You unfortunately have to get up that early to put it all together, Right.

[Stu Burguiere]

I don't have that option.

[Pat Gray]

So 3 o'clock is really early.

[Stu Burguiere]

It's early. Yeah. It's the middle of the night.

[Pat Gray]

I think people would understand if you just. You woke up about half hour before the show. Yeah. You know, you wake up a half hour before the show. Run right in. Just start talking. You know, I think people would understand. They don't want you getting up at 3D path. That's crazy.

[Stu Burguiere]

It is. It is crazy. Maybe I'll try that.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah. See what they say. At least run it by them.

[Stu Burguiere]

Can you tell the difference that I just got here as opposed to three hours ago?

[Pat Gray]

I forgot to prep any news stories for the show today. But so what?

[Stu Burguiere]

So what do you think of the daylight saving time going away and just having one time and we. We don't switch back and forth anymore.

[Pat Gray]

It's one of those things that I'm in favor of happening whether it has positive results or not. Me too, because I just can't get over the bizarre idea that we just changed the time.

[Stu Burguiere]

I know, it's inexplicable.

[Pat Gray]

Well, yeah, we want more hours. Okay, well then just wake up earlier. Like Glenn kept saying, like. Yeah, but you know, farmers need more light in certain times. And I go, in 1930. Yeah, well, yes, but also the light is still there. It's not going anywhere. It's just a matter of when you decide what the number says when you wake up.

[Stu Burguiere]

That is true. That is true.

[Pat Gray]

All we have to do is just adjust the time we wake up. We'll have the same amount. You can wake up whenever you want. Want Pat wakes up at 3:00 in the morning because he's insane. You can do that too, if you really want to see it all. Or you can wake up later.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

Like the number on the clock makes no difference with how much light there is. The light is all there. Whether it's like it doesn't change the sun.

[Stu Burguiere]

No, the sun has a routine.

[Pat Gray]

Yes.

[Stu Burguiere]

And that doesn't change because we change the clock.

[Pat Gray]

Exactly.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, that's right. That is true.

[Pat Gray]

And I can't get over, like, it's, you know, I compare it to Pat is the thing they've done in Major League Baseball where they just plant someone on second base in extra innings. They're like, oh, mystery ghost runner at second now. And like the guy who got made the last out in the last inning just appears on second at the beginning of the inning. It's like, I don't care if it makes the game better. It's dumb.

[Stu Burguiere]

It is.

[Pat Gray]

You don't just place people on bases. That's not the sport at all.

[Stu Burguiere]

I feel the same way about the new kickoff rule in the NFL. I hate it.

[Pat Gray]

It's so. I hate it. It looks stupid that it's a little different because it's. It's just kind of adjusting the rules. It's not necessarily like, I still don't like inserting something from out of nowhere. Yeah, but I just don't like it. I mean so in that part of it is just traditionalist. But also it's just like we, time is a measure. Like we use that as a scientific measure. You can't just change the numbers. What are you talking about? Like, it drives me crazy. So for that perspective, I am all it. You know, I, I just don't, I don't like it. I don't, I don't like the, the changing the clock thing. It doesn't make any sense to me. Just keep the clock the same and then change when you wake up. If you really want to wake up.

[Stu Burguiere]

At a different time, you want more hours in the day, you get up.

[Pat Gray]

Earlier, there's never more. You can't make more hours. There's not more hours in the day. It's the same amount of hours in the day.

[Stu Burguiere]

What?

[Pat Gray]

It's just a matter of what you're calling it.

[Stu Burguiere]

When did that start though?

[Pat Gray]

Always. It's just like fire has always been able to be put out by water. Glenn Beck all right, so talking about sleep a little bit, you got to make sure you get your best sleep. It's not often, but every once in a while, you know, the most irritating things in life turn out to be the easiest things to fix. From time to time you probably have had a really hard time getting to sleep. Especially if you're getting up at like three in the morning. For example, example, you might lie there in bed, you might stare up at the ceiling for hours. And that sucks because you know you're going to be tired the next day. Thankfully, there's something out there that can really send you off to a great night's sleep. It's something called Z Factor. It comes from the makers of Relief Factor and is a 100% drug free way to help you fall asleep faster, sleep better and stay asleep longer. Z Factor uses a formula of four all natural ingredients to calm your mind and relax your body so you can eat, ease into sleep a bit faster and sleep right through the night. Glenn uses this all the time. It works for him. You can rediscover the joy of a great night's sleep with Z Factor and get the best sleep you've ever had. Try Z Factor from relief factor and save 46% right now. On your first order go to relieffactor.com or just give him a call. 800 the number four relief 800. The number four relief. It is Z Factor from Relief Factor. Check it out now. 800, the number four relief.

[Stu Burguiere]

Glenn Beck, Stupid gear. Steve Dace, Jason Whitlock and me, Pat Gray. Listen to all your favorite conservative voices. BlazeTV.com promo code Glenn Patton. Stew for Glenn. He should return tomorrow. Meantime, on Friday, the big sentencing thing came down from Judge Marshawn and what a sentencing it was.

[Pat Gray]

Oh, he's powerful.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, yeah. No jail and no penalty. So what was this 3436 felony thing all about again? No waste of time.

[Pat Gray]

You say no penalty, but you forgot about the unqualified dismissal.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

So he, he got. He had to. Had to leave without any qualifications.

[Stu Burguiere]

Right.

[Pat Gray]

So you say no punishment. Imagine walking out of there and thinking, gosh, I wish I had some qualifications to this departure. And you have.

[Stu Burguiere]

Not that you had none.

[Pat Gray]

Well, it could be good quality. But what if it was something like. Something you must positive massage. And he didn't get that.

[Stu Burguiere]

And he didn't get that.

[Pat Gray]

No.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, okay.

[Pat Gray]

He didn't get that at all.

[Stu Burguiere]

I can see where that might be a problem because he did not get that. That he did not get a massage before he left.

[Pat Gray]

No. As far as I know, he got nothing of the sort. He just had to leave.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

As if none of this happened. Which is fascinating considering we spent millions and millions of dollars on it.

[Stu Burguiere]

And how much time and effort went into screaming about this guy? He's a felon. He's a convicted felon. Is he?

[Pat Gray]

Is he?

[Stu Burguiere]

Is he really?

[Pat Gray]

Really? All right, is anyone impressed by that? I can tell you by the election results, the answer to that was no. No, nobody was even. CNN did a segment the other, I think last week with Harry Anton, who does all their numbers stuff. He's actually pretty good. Yeah, it's good. And he was saying that 5% of voters saw January 6th as the defining moment of the first Trump term. 5%. And you think about that and you're just like, gosh, 5%.

[Stu Burguiere]

Wow.

[Pat Gray]

They put so much effort into making the entire election about that one day, about January 6th. January 6th, January 6th. They did it over and over and over and over again. They put all that effort in. And while the one you're talking about, the one he was convicted on, was not specifically related to January 6, most of the other stuff was most of the other legal attempts, and they put all their eggs in that basket. They failed on every count except this one, which was in a far left district, which they manipulated every rule to get this conviction, including the statute of Limitations. And it meant nothing. They got nothing out of it. They totally blew it.

[Stu Burguiere]

I love it. I love that.

[Pat Gray]

I love it, too. I'm glad they failed. I'm glad this approach failed. I'm glad Lawfare is showing to be a failure. But it does destroy people's lives. I mean, Trump luckily does have the resources and the support behind him to do this. But, I mean, look at the people who bake cakes and won't bake cakes for certain, you know, events they don't agree with. Like those people, you know, their lives get destroyed.

[Stu Burguiere]

Right.

[Pat Gray]

You know, and luckily, we hear about some of them, but we don't hear about enough of them.

[Stu Burguiere]

J.D. vance said something interesting about the J6 pardons, which are supposed to happen starting this coming Monday when Trump is inaugurated. And here's what he had to say about the pardons.

[Pat Gray]

January 6th pardons.

[Stu Burguiere]

President Trump says there's a process.

[Pat Gray]

Where is the line drawn on who will and wouldn't be considered for? I think it's very simple. Look, if you protested peacefully on January 6th, and you've had Merrick Garland's Department of Justice treat you like a gang member, you should be pardoned. If you committed violence on that day, obviously you shouldn't be pardoned. And there's a little bit of a gray area there. But we're very much committed to seeing the equal administration of law. And there are a lot of people, we think in the wake of January 6th who were prosecuted unfairly. We need to rectify that.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah. Yeah, we do. There's a lot of people who weren't even there that were sentenced to really egregious penalties in prison. There were people who didn't go into the building who were sentenced.

[Pat Gray]

There are journalists who currently work at the Blaze, but weren't working at the Blaze. Then our friend Steve Baker.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yep.

[Pat Gray]

Who was sent. Who was, I guess, pled guilty to being in the Capitol, which, I mean, he was. He was there. He was there. He's on camera. He's doing things that journalists do in these situations. There were, by the way, plenty of other journalists in this building that didn't get charged. It was okay, if you were the New York Times to go into the building and take photos. You won awards for it.

[Stu Burguiere]

Right.

[Pat Gray]

Steve's reporting apparently did not agree with the narrative that he was supposed to. So, you know, he got charged. So I think. I mean, look, I. Tell me what you think of this, because I think we had a guest on who was a victim of some of this. I don't know his entire situation. But he was in. You did hear this.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, I heard that.

[Pat Gray]

And he was like, basically, even the people who were charged with violent crimes should be pardoned. And there's a big push from kind.

[Stu Burguiere]

Of the fruit from the poison tree. Right. That's sort of his argument that the whole thing was iffy. And so. So all. Everybody who was convicted should be set free.

[Pat Gray]

And I understand that. Thought I tend to be more on the J.D. vance side, though, of things where if.

[Stu Burguiere]

I thought you probably would be.

[Pat Gray]

If we. I've had relatives who are police officers. If you're hitting a police officer over the head with a flagpole, I don't care how many times you tell me that there are FBI informants who. Who are trying to make the event worse. If you did it with your flagpole to a police officer's head, I don't want you released.

[Stu Burguiere]

What if I did hit the ribs? What if I hit him in the ribs with my.

[Pat Gray]

No, no, no. Don't try to injure police officers. If you would.

[Stu Burguiere]

That's fair.

[Pat Gray]

I know that's fair. It's a big ask, but like.

[Stu Burguiere]

Okay, but let me ask you this. Is four years enough time if I hit some police officer in the head with a pole?

[Pat Gray]

Yes, probably.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

I mean, I thought about it this.

[Stu Burguiere]

Way, like, because that's why I think. Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

They say insurrection, right. They say the day democracy almost died.

[Stu Burguiere]

Shut up.

[Pat Gray]

January 6th. Worse than the Civil War. Worse than World War II. Obviously, all that's ridiculous. What was that day? It was a riot.

[Stu Burguiere]

It was a riot.

[Pat Gray]

It was a riot. And like, if you think of. Like I was thinking about another riot. That would happen, right. Like if there was a gigantic bar brawl at a biker bar and police showed up and the biker bar, it got out of control and a couple of the bikers wound up hitting police. Police in the head with a nearby flagpole, which was just sitting by for a bottle. It's a beer bottle and a bottle over the head. What should happen in that situation? That person should go to jail. They're going to serve a term.

[Stu Burguiere]

Should they serve 24 years?

[Pat Gray]

No, probably not. My guess is it's probably. I mean, obviously if you murder somebody or something. That's not what we're talking about here. That's different.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

If you had no one police officer, you should face a penalty, in my view, and you should serve that penalty. That penalty is probably. And I'd have to look it up, but probably not four years.

[Stu Burguiere]

Probably not.

[Pat Gray]

I remember doing.

[Stu Burguiere]

Almost certainly not.

[Pat Gray]

I remember in One of Glenn's books. And I remember doing the research for it and being shocked by it and having to check it so many times. But like, convicted child molesters often serve less than three years in prison.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

You know, it's like that's definitely worse than anything that happened on January 6th. Molesting a child. Can we agree on that part of it? I don't know. Maybe the left can't, but I think that's pretty clear. So I don't necessarily think now there are. There may be a few people who deserve longer terms. There is some evidence that some people really were trying to do terrible things. And I think that that's something you have to look at on a case by case basis. But I think rationally, people who did not commit violent crimes certainly have served their crime, served their terms. Steve Baker wasn't doing anything wrong at all.

[Stu Burguiere]

Should. Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

When every minute of him being in that building is on film, you can look at exactly what he did, which was reporting. Absolutely should not be facing a crime like that. You know what? I've read Jay Johnston, the actor who is a sketch. He was on Mr. Show. He was on Bob's Burgers, several other shows. Very funny guy. I mean, one of the most. I think one of the most talented sketch comedy shows there's ever. Sketch comedy actors there's ever been. He was there and he was in the building for a few minutes. What they say is he helped wash. One of the things they charge him with is helping wash the eyes of someone who got hit with pepper spray. He helped.

[Stu Burguiere]

Like, how dare he?

[Pat Gray]

How dare he? Right.

[Stu Burguiere]

How dare he?

[Pat Gray]

That's what they say. They say he pushed. They say he participated in pushing back. Back in one of the, like, you know, scuffles. I don't know. I haven't seen the video of it. I don't know if he really did something terrible. He should service her. I don't think he does, though. And how much time for Jay Johnson? What?

[Stu Burguiere]

How much time?

[Pat Gray]

I. I don't remember. I don't remember off the top of my head. It was. I mean, is he still. A lot. I will say a lot of these terms were not 24 years. Yeah, it is important to know a lot.

[Stu Burguiere]

There's only a few that got that.

[Pat Gray]

Kind of sentence who have had jail time have already served it in a route. Yeah, there are a lot of people in that.

[Stu Burguiere]

Like the guy that you guys talked to last week.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah. So that has happened too. It's important.

[Stu Burguiere]

But he was in solitary confinement for four months.

[Pat Gray]

Right. That's nuts.

[Stu Burguiere]

I mean, that's insane.

[Pat Gray]

And has to be wrecked.

[Stu Burguiere]

He didn't do anything violent. He's in solitary confinement.

[Pat Gray]

Crazy. For months. You know, the Oath Keepers trial, which is one that Steve covered, Steve Baker covered, where a lot of these guys, the people who were accusing them of what they did with these. And this is why you have to be careful with what I'm saying about violent crimes. They were. People were saying they were violent against police officers, and then the video didn't back it up. They didn't have the video to defend themselves. However, the government wouldn't give it to them.

[Stu Burguiere]

Unbelievable.

[Pat Gray]

We now know that they weren't even in the place they said that the accusers said they were.

[Stu Burguiere]

Was it the head of the Proud Boys or was it the Oath Keepers? That was in Baltimore, Maryland.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah, that's the. At the time, the Proud Boys guys was not there. Now they have a lot of, you know, text messages and stuff from him, potentially. Their argument is that he was helping arrange some of these activities, which, again, could be seen as a more serious crime. 24 years.

[Stu Burguiere]

Seems 24 years.

[Pat Gray]

That's a guy, you know.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, yeah, it does.

[Pat Gray]

But again, you know, he was one of the. I mean, even taking out the leadership of some of these organizations, because that can get a little squirrely with other stuff. A lot of these people just showed up to hear a speech and walked into a building. It's absurd. But this is still going on.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, yeah.

[Pat Gray]

And I think so.

[Stu Burguiere]

I think the building that our taxpayer dollars pay for, too, by the way. And should they have interrupted the natural process? No, they shouldn't have. No, no, they shouldn't have.

[Pat Gray]

We've covered that widely.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah, I mean, it's. It's pretty clear.

[Pat Gray]

Do you have a problem with what J.D. vance said there?

[Stu Burguiere]

Only that it depends on who he's talking about.

[Pat Gray]

Yeah, but that's what he's saying. He's saying it depends on a case by case basis. He said. And he even said with the violent crimes, there is some gray area there, which is true. He did say that because some of the crimes that were supposedly violent, you know, like, I don't know if J.E. johnson was included in this, but, like, they talked about him. It was a, you know, one of those situations where groups of people were pushing against each other and he, quote, unquote, participated by, I believe it says in the charges for a few seconds now. Okay. I don't know. Maybe it shouldn't. Okay. But. But, like, is that a violent crime? I would argue no, no. But I, you know, so I don't know how many of those are included in that.

[Stu Burguiere]

Probably a lot.

[Pat Gray]

Look, assign somebody competent in the Trump administration. Get in there, assign somebody competent. Take a few. They should be doing this already, but take a few weeks. Look at every piece of video. Give me a list of who's good and who's not. That's how you do it. Hopefully they've done that and they probably could have that done already. Ready. Or they could assign someone immediately the second they get into office to look at it and get this right.

[Stu Burguiere]

888727 Beck. More coming up.

[Pat Gray]

I mean, this isn't the Biden administration. They should be able to pull things off with that. Are competent. And I think they can and I think they will. All right. As a general rule, Glenn doesn't do the whole cell phone thing. He doesn't typically like them. He doesn't like that kind of hassle. It's kind of a, I feel like largely a smart decision. But he did make an exception in GET1 because people are always trying to get in touch with him. And he wanted to support an organization that is really, really positive. It's Patriot Mobile. They are a great group of people, a great organization. They are a vital part of the parallel economy we've been building over the past few years. Of course, the Belize is part of that too. They're American's only Christian conservative mobile company. Their passion is really clear. They care about God. They care about the country. Country. They care about our freedoms and they constantly act to glorify God. This is in their mission statement. This is not like a company that you're complaining about with some WOKE policy. It's the exact opposite of that. They have nationwide dependable coverage with access to all three major networks. So you get the same coverage without sending money to leftist causes. And their customer service is better than all the others. So why not go with patriot mobile today? Patriotmobile.com Beckham or call 972 Patriot. Get a free month of service with the promo code Beck. Switch to Patriot Mobile today and defend freedom with every call and text that you make. It's patriot mobile.com Beck patriotmobile.com Beck or call them 972 Patriot.

[Stu Burguiere]

All right, welcome. I guess we're completely out in left field on the daylight saving situation.

[Pat Gray]

I would not say that at all.

[Stu Burguiere]

You wouldn't say that.

[Pat Gray]

There are a couple people who are upset with us, though.

[Stu Burguiere]

Oh. Oh, no.

[Pat Gray]

Bobby, we're on X at Studios America.

[Stu Burguiere]

Okay.

[Pat Gray]

At Pat unleashed. I believe, I believe so. Check it out there. But someone says, Bobby says, hey, someone please educate Pat and stuff on the. Why we have daylight savings time.

[Stu Burguiere]

Oh, okay.

[Pat Gray]

It's so that it's light outside when school children go to the bus stop in the morning on standard time. It's still dark and less safe for children.

[Stu Burguiere]

Wait a minute. Okay. What time are your kids going to school on standard time?

[Pat Gray]

4. Very early.

[Stu Burguiere]

3.

[Pat Gray]

I mean, I can remember it being, you know, it's dark sometimes in the mornings.

[Stu Burguiere]

If they're there at five in the morning, by six, even in Texas, it's getting. It's light outside. Are your kids lining up in the bus stop at 6 in the morning? I don't think so.

[Pat Gray]

It's like a Taylor Swift concert. They get up there very early, Pat. Okay, well, here's the other thing I would bring up because there's two options here.

[Stu Burguiere]

Yeah.

[Pat Gray]

One is we can do the daylight savings time approach in which we just tell everyone that the time is mysteriously changed by an hour twice a year. So all of society goes to their clocks and changes their clocks and we act as if this scientific measure of time changes twice a year for no reason.

[Stu Burguiere]

Okay. Or the other option. Alternative, yes.

[Pat Gray]

The other option is your school opens an hour later. Different. A little hour later.

[Stu Burguiere]

Right.

[Pat Gray]

So, like, instead of going at 8. At 8, they just call it 9. You'd still be going at the same time in both scenarios.

[Stu Burguiere]

Right.

[Pat Gray]

Because time is like a scientific measure, but we call it different things. And in this period, we would just call it. What you would do is just say, hey, just go an hour later. The school just changes the schedule. So a school changes it twice a year or all of society bends for kids at school. Buses, stops. I don't know. One of the, One of the two.

[Stu Burguiere]

Again, I don't know that you're really. Are they getting there that early in the morning?

[Pat Gray]

I don't, I have not. I don't know.

[Stu Burguiere]

I mean, maybe school starts at 3 for some people. I don't know.

[Pat Gray]

It does.

[Stu Burguiere]

I don't know. Maybe the bus shows up really, really early.

[Pat Gray]

How about this one? Daylight savings all years. So we can drive home from work when it's still daylight. My understanding is you could drive, but no night. Yeah. Like, there's lights on the front of your car, headlights that allow for such things.

[Stu Burguiere]

So.

[Pat Gray]

But like, another thing you could do is just change the hours of your. If you really are that worried about driving home at night, you could just, Just change your hours and drive home during the day. And you see, and your. My employer won't change his hours. Well, why would the whole country bend for this?

[Stu Burguiere]

Everyone.

[Pat Gray]

Arizona's like, screw it.

[Stu Burguiere]

We're not doing it right. And that.

[Pat Gray]

That's the only sane approach. Arizona is the only one that makes any sense to me.

[Stu Burguiere]

That's why sometimes they're on Pacific time, sometimes they're on mountain time, and they're.

[Pat Gray]

Just, like, screwing it. We don't care if it screws everybody else.

[Stu Burguiere]

I think there's a portion of Indiana does the same thing.

[Pat Gray]

All right.

[Stu Burguiere]

Glenn should be back tomorrow. This is Glenn Beck.