Transcript
A (0:04)
Hello and welcome back to the Glossy Podcast. I'm your host, senior fashion reporter Danny Parisi, and this is our last episode of the year. We've had a great year covering the fashion industry. Thank you all for listening and we are looking forward to more episodes in 2026. This episode, we wanted to talk about the K shaped economy, probably a term many of you have heard, but it's particularly relevant to the fashion industry given that there are several different consumer segments. There's luxury, there's contemporary, there' mass apparel. Our international reporter Zofia Zvaglinska joined me for a discussion about the K shaped economy. So we wanted to dive into what the K shaped economy is and what it means for our industry. Hello, Zofia, thank you for joining me for our conversation about the K shaped economy, which is something that you've written about very recently and probably many of our listeners have heard quite a deal about in the last couple months. We're going to get into what exactly that is. We'll just spend a minute on what it is, but then we'll get into more of the specifics. I think we want to structure this discussion kind of like a K shape, where we'll start with one end. We'll start about the top end of the K, then we'll talk about the bottom end of the K, the brands and consumers there, and the trends and things we're seeing on both sides. And then we will finish off by talking about kind of the middle, this big empty white space in the middle of these two branches of the K, what brands are kind of left out, what consumers are left out. And we'll also talk about what it all means for the future of our industry. But do you want to define it or do you want me to define it? You wrote about it recently, so you probably have it down.
B (1:48)
Yeah. So I think you can define it from what I understood around it. It's basically a situation where especially the luxury customers end up kind of being able to spend more and then anyone on the lower end and the middle end is stuck and they basically can't spend and don't have access to the funds to do that. So that's my understanding of it. And for the luxury industry in particular, for ultra VIPs, it's a pretty good economy model to be a part of, but obviously not so good for anyone in the other two categories.
A (2:21)
Yes, exactly. As you said, there's. There's different shapes economists use sometimes to describe economic growth or progress. There's a U shape, which is Gradual. There's a V shape that's like a sharp downturn and upturn. K shape is a divergence. Just like you said. The people who are already doing well are doing better than ever. The people who are not doing well are doing worse and the split is getting bigger. There's lots of data backing this up. I found one of many data points that supports it is from bank of America. In October, high income households increased their spending by nearly 3%, lower income by less than 1%. So there's sometimes when people talk about the economy like being good or doing well, I always feel like that term is a little misleading because there's many parts of the economy that could be doing well or not well. And there's different things you can look at as an indicator. If the stock market's doing good, it's like that's great for people who own stocks, but if you look at wages which have stagnated since like the 1970s, and that's not good for the majority of people who work for a living instead of own assets. So anyway, one more thing I'll say about just the concept of the K shaped economy before we get into the specifics is has this happened before? The term a K shaped economy I think originates from the pandemic, which during that time there was a lot of divergence in people's fortunes. There were white collar workers who got to just work from home in their nice home offices and everything was fine. And then there were people at the lower end who are losing their jobs and all sorts of bad stuff happening. So the term originates from them. But the idea of wealth inequality or a divergent economy is not new. And there's probably many periods in history we could point to, but let's look at each wing of the K. So like you said, Zofia, at the top end you have the luxury brands and the luxury consumers or wealthier consumers. I think one outcome of this divergence is the brands feel a pressure to focus in on a narrower slice of their consumer which is at the higher end. So Chanel raising their prices all the time, luxury brands in general raising their prices in a way that probably cuts out people who are not at the top of the income bracket, but could maybe afford a luxury item every now and then. If the prices keep going up, then they probably will just never afford it and they just won't buy it. But the luxury brands are thinking we'll just focus in on our narrow slice of customers who can always afford it and who don't mind raising Prices. That's something we've talked about on this podcast many times in the past. I have a good stat I want to share and then I'll shut up so you can talk. But on on average, luxury prices are 61% higher than they were five years ago in 2025 compared to 2020.
