
Plus, using A.I. to find a date.
Loading summary
A
This podcast is supported by the Defending Our Neighbors Fund. Across the country, immigrants are facing family separation, wrongful detention and deportation without due process or access to legal support. The Defending Our Neighbors Fund exists to change that. Powered by people like you, the Defending Our Neighbors Fund is providing access to life saving legal aid to families in crisis. But they urgently need your help to meet unprecedented demand. Together we can defend our neighbors and keep families together. Donate now@defendingourneighbors.org donate.
B
From the new York Times, it's the headlines. I'm Will Jarvis in for Tracy Mumford. Today's Thursday, November 6th. Here's what we're covering. At the Supreme Court yesterday, the justices heard one of the most consequential cases of the term as they considered arguments about President Trump's aggressive use of tariffs. The question at the center of the case is whether Trump overstepped his authority when he used a decades old law to impose sweeping surcharges on goods coming into the US I want to make a very important distinction here. We don't contend that what's being exercised here is the power to tax. It's the power to regulate foreign commerce. These are lawyers for the government argued that the law gives the president broad authority to respond to economic and national security threats. Past presidents have used it to impose things like sanctions or embargoes. But Trump is the first president to use it for tariffs.
C
I just don't understand this argument. It's a congressional power, not a presidential power to tax. And you want to say tariffs are not taxes, but that's exactly what they are, degenerating money from American citizens revenue.
B
The court's liberal justices sharply questioned the administration and they were joined by several key members of the conservative majority who seemed skeptical of Trump's authority to impose the widespread tariffs.
D
I mean, these are kind of across the board. And so is it your contention that every country needed to be tariffed because of threats to the defense and industrial base? I mean, it Spain, France, I mean, I could see it with some countries.
B
Ahead of Wednesday's hearing, President Trump said the case was, quote, literally life or death for our country. And Trump's treasury secretary and commerce secretary went to the courtroom to sit in on the arguments. The outcome of the case could be decided in weeks or in months. If the court rules against the administration, the government could be forced to refund some or all of the billions of dollars the US has collected in tariff revenue so far. Still, trade experts say there are other ways, including some obscure legal provisions that the president could use to tax imports going forward. For more on the hearing and what it could mean for presidential power more broadly, listen to today's episode of the Daily with Time Supreme Court reporter Adam Liptak. Now, two more updates on the Trump administration.
C
I anticipate there'll be additional disruptions. There'll be frustration. But in the end, our sole role is to make sure that we keep this airspace as safe as possible.
B
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy says that the federal governments will limit air traffic at 40 of the country's busiest airports starting tomorrow if the government shutdown continues. The new limits could lead to thousands of flights being canceled on short notice ahead of the busiest travel season of the year. Duffy said the move would lift some pressure from air traffic controllers, who he said have been stretched to the limit. They haven't been paid for weeks and many were working overtime shifts before the shutdown due to staffing shortages across the country, air traffic controller absences have already led to significant delays for travelers in recent weeks. The intensity of Duffy's warnings around disruptions to air travel have been ramping up and have been notably political as the administration has tried to turn up pressure on Democrats to end the shutdown. Also, a federal judge in Illinois has ordered immigration officials to improve conditions at a detention center near Chicago, conditions he had described as unnecessarily cruel. He said the government must provide detainees with showers to clean water and access to lawyers, among other things. The order came a day after several former detainees told the judge about the site's squalid conditions with no soap, no beds, garbage everywhere, and some people sleeping on the concrete floor. While the facility was designed for short term detention, some people have been locked up there for days. As the administration has ramped up its immigration crackdown in Chicago, there have been frequent protests outside. In a statement, a spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security said detainees claims of poor conditions at the center are, quote, false. The judge gave federal officials until midday tomorrow to submit a report on their progress. In Mexico, President Claudia Schoenbaum says she's filed a criminal complaint against a man who groped her on the street, an incident that was caught on camera and shocked many in the country. It happened on Tuesday. She was walking between meetings in central Mexico City to save time with no security, when the man moved to kiss her and put his hands on her chest. He's since been arrested. Speaking at a press conference, Shane Baum said, if this can happen to the president, what's going to happen to all the young women and women across our country? Shane Bomb is Mexico's first female president, and she made ending violence against women a centerpiece of her campaign. Sexual harassment is not a federal crime in the country or even a crime in all Mexican states, something Shanebaum said she'll ask officials to reconsider. For the moment, the high profile case has prompted many Mexican women to reflect on how common it is to be groped even while walking in public during the day. Many women the Times spoke with recalled being touched inappropriately on public transit. In particular, people who study gender based violence in the country said Shanebaum's decision to speak out and press charges was a meaningful change in the status quo, with one saying, quote, it sends an important message that such violence is completely real.
E
And finally, in the past few years, dating apps have struggled with what they call the cycle of despair, where you download an app, swipe on a bunch of matches and then don't get responses or get ghosted and delete the app, only to redownload it a few months later. These issues have really hurt the companies behind the dating apps, and as people are less willing to pay for subscriptions, the dating apps themselves are struggling to make money. So now they're trying to come up with a new plan to turn their businesses around, and that involves AI.
B
Eli Tan is a technology reporter at the Times who's been covering the AI ification of dating apps, from top brands like Tinder to new AI native startups. He says there's a whole range of tools the apps are rolling out. One example, there's an AI matchmaker service that has you spend about a half hour on a phone call with a chatbot that asks you questions about the kind of person you're looking for. It then charges you 25 bucks for a single custom match who's supposedly a great fit. There's also the app Grindr, which has what it calls an AI wingman that gives conversation advice and Hinge lets you use AI to review your profile and give feedback about what to tweak.
E
It's still yet to be seen if these features will catch on, but a lot of people are already turning to them. One person I talked to named emma was a 25 year old in San Francisco. She tried out the AI matchmaker and she was nervous about the date, but it ended up going great. They talked for multiple hours at a bar and afterwards they exchanged numbers and said they were looking forward to a second date. But it in the end he ghosted her and never texted her back. I think it's a reminder that the AI and the algorithms can only do so much for our dating lives. And in the end, it's still going to be two human beings that are talking to each other.
B
Those are the headlines. I'm Will Jarvis. We'll be back tomorrow with the latest updates and the Friday news quiz.
Host: Will Jarvis (in for Tracy Mumford)
Date: November 6, 2025
Podcast: The New York Times – The Headlines
This episode explores several major stories making news. The main focus is on the U.S. Supreme Court’s review of President Trump’s use of tariffs under a decades-old law, questioning executive authority in global trade. The show also covers looming disruptions in air travel caused by the government shutdown, a federal judge’s intervention in an Illinois immigration detention facility, a criminal complaint from Mexico’s president after a public assault, and experiments in AI-driven dating apps. The reporting maintains the concise, analytical tone characteristic of The Headlines.
This episode provides a brisk and informative tour of high-stakes legal, political, and cultural developments in the U.S. and abroad. The reporting balances clarity of facts with contextual insight, offering listeners a clear understanding of why these stories matter and what may come next.