
Plus, why nursing homes are hiring M.M.A. fighters.
Loading summary
Tracy Mumford
She knows how did you blab? No. The Devil Wears Prada too. He's the movie event 20 Years in the making. Honestly can't with the secrets anymore so I think we just, we should tell her. Will you two please spit it out already? Um on May 1st be the first to experience it only in theaters. In light of the recent scandal, I'm
Javier Hernandez
here to restore your credibility.
Tracy Mumford
Oh cause we're a team now. That's a nice story. The Devil wears Prada the second of Lady PG13 may be inappropriate for children under 13 only in Peter's May 1st. From the New York Times, it's the Headlines. I'm Tracy Mumford. Today's Wednesday, April 29th. Here's what we're covering. Today is the last day of arguments this term at the Supreme Court, and the justices are set to consider a pair of cases that they fast tracked to get on the schedule. The cases both center on Temporary Protected Status, or tps, a decades old legal protection that has allowed migrants from countries facing war or other humanitarian crises to live and work in the U.S. president Trump, though, has moved to revoke those protections immediately for hundreds of thousands of Haitians and Syrians and to expel them from the country. TPS holders, including students, doctors and engineers, have pushed back in the courts, saying they could be killed if they're forced to return. The arguments the justices will hear today will focus on how and why the administration tried to revoke their status. By law, the government must review conditions in the countries in question before making a decision, among other steps. Lawyers representing the TPS holders say that didn't happen here, and they argue that in the case of the Haitians, specifically, the administration acted with racial bias. They've pointed to Trump's four false accusations about Haitians eating people's pets and being undesirable because they come from what Trump called a filthy, disgusting country. On the administration's part, it has denied that race is a factor and said the terminations are based on foreign policy and national security considerations. The justice's ruling will likely also have implications for more than a million other TPS holders from other countries who whose protections the administration is also trying to terminate. The TPS arguments are just one of several high stakes cases the court took on in its last week of the term. We'll hear argument Next in case 2410 68, Monsanto Company vs. Darnell. One case earlier this week involved the weed killer roundup. There have been widespread claims that the product causes cancer, and ultimately the court's decision could determine whether thousands of lawsuits against the company that makes it can go forward. And what's to prevent the government from using this to find out the identities of everybody at a particular church, a particular political organization? The court also grappled this week with the issue of just how much personal cell phone data police can sweep up in an investigation. Some authorities have been using a technique called Geo Fencing, which lets them gather location data from all cell phone users near a crime scene. That's helped them track down suspects. But critics of the practice argue that it's unconstitutional and puts the privacy of everyday Americans at risk. Decisions from the court on all of these cases, as well as other critical issues like birthright citizenship and the Voting Rights act, are expected starting in late June. Now two other updates from Washington.
Javier Hernandez
You know how sometimes you wake up
Tracy Mumford
in the morning and the first lady puts out a statement demanding you be
Javier Hernandez
fired from your job? We've all been there, right?
Tracy Mumford
As the feud between Jimmy Kimmel and the White House has kicked back up recently, federal regulators have ordered an unprecedented review of ABC's broadcast licenses. Back in the fall, Kimmel was briefly pulled off the air by abc, his home network, after the Trump administration criticized comments he'd made in the wake of Charlie Kirk's assassination. This past week, Kimmel drew the White House's anger again after he joked that first lady Melania Trump had the glow of a, quote, expectant widow just days before an alleged assassination attempt at the White House Correspondents Dinner. Now the Federal Communications Commission says it's reviewing all of ABC's broadcast licenses not because of the joke, but as part of what it says is an investigation into the network's DEI policies. The move all but guarantees a drawn out legal battle that will lock ABC in an expensive running war with the federal government.
Javier Hernandez
And, well, they're back this time about a picture of seashells on a North Carolina beach a year ago.
Tracy Mumford
James Comey, the former director of the FBI and frequent critic of President Trump, has been indicted again. Trump has been openly calling for the Justice Department to prosecute people he sees as his political enemies, like Comey. In the fall, DOJ lawyers brought their first case against him, though a judge dismissed it. In the new indictment, they're claiming that a picture Comey posted online was a threat on the president's life. It showed shells arranged to say 86, 47, 86 being slang to get rid of something, and 47 being a reference to Trump, the 47th president. The indictment claims a reasonable person would interpret the message, quote, as a serious expression of intent to do harm. In a video released yesterday, Comey vowed to fight the charges.
Javier Hernandez
I'm still innocent, I'm still not afraid, and I still believe in the independent federal judiciary. So let's go.
Tracy Mumford
Back. In 2015, Sam Altman sent an email to Elon Musk. He pitched an idea, a Silicon Valley research lab that would build powerful AI systems as part of what he called some sort of nonprofit. Soon, that nonprofit was founded largely with donations from Musk. It was called OpenAI, and would go on to lead the tech industry into a new era of artificial intelligence. But over the course of the next decade, that relationship fractured. Musk quit OpenAI, and he and Altman went from being collaborators to competitors. Now their simmering feud has come to a head, with Musk suing Altman in a blockbuster trial that kicked off this week.
Cade Metz
People in Silicon Valley are expecting high drama, but the implications of this trial are much larger than that.
Tracy Mumford
Cade Metz has been reporting for the Times from the California courthouse, where Musk's testimony is expected to continue this morning and where Altman is also slated to take the stand. Cade says Musk is claiming that Altman took his money, deceived him, and abandoned OpenAI's original humanitarian mission, instead building the company into a roughly $700 billion tech juggernaut. In opening arguments yesterday, OpenAI's lawyers said those claims are basically all just, quote, sour grapes as they work to convince the jury not to take Musk's side.
Cade Metz
If Elon Musk wins his case, it could shift the balance of power in the AI race. Musk seeks tens of billions of dollars in damages, but he also wants to cripple OpenAI. He wants to remove Sam Altman from the OpenAI board of directors. And he wants to unravel the company that oversees ChatGPT and so many other AI technologies. And in the end, that benefits the company's many rivals, including xai, the artificial intelligence company run by Elon Musk.
Tracy Mumford
And finally, in Japan, there is a problem. Like in many countries, they're short on nursing home staff to take care of their aging population. But there is also a potential solution that involves, hear me out here, bodybuilders.
Javier Hernandez
I visited a few centers in Japan, and it was a really heartwarming scene. There were these young bodybuilders, and they were in their tank tops, showing off their muscles to this crowd of elderly patients. And they really brought a lot of joy and excitement to the centers. You know, the residents were smiling. They were, like, punching their muscles and doing exercises with them.
Tracy Mumford
Javier Hernandez is the Times Tokyo bureau chief. He says a number of Japanese companies are specifically trying to recruit not just bodybuilders, but also MMA fighters and sumo wrestlers to work in senior care facilities. They're offering them, in some cases housing, plus gym memberships and even protein supplements.
Javier Hernandez
It's a bit unconventional, but it actually makes sense. A lot of these athletes are looking for work. They have shorter careers once they get older. They don't have the opportunity to to win contests or enter any kind of event. So they're struggling often for jobs. But in the care industry, there's actually a huge demand for this kind of skill set. They are physically strong, they have stamina, they can work with people. And so these jobs in many ways make sense for elite athletes.
Tracy Mumford
Javier says the recruiting push is also about helping to change perceptions around who is a caregiver. The field is often dominated by women, and Japan is no exception to that. One staffer who has helped recruit men who are MMA athletes said, quote, there's a lot of testosterone in the room, but when it comes to taking care of the elderly, the fighters are very tender and very caring. Those are the headlines today on the Daily the controversial fight over taxing billionaires in California. You can listen to that in the New York Times app or wherever you get your podcasts. I'm Traci Mumford. We'll be back tomorrow.
Podcast Announcer
This podcast is supported by USA for unhcr. When war tears apart lives in Ukraine, Sudan and around the world, the UN Refugee agency is there delivering food, shelter and safety to families who lose everything. Now, with crises growing and funding collapsing, refugee families urgently need more help. This UN Refugee Giving Day join a life saving movement. Every gift is matched, doubling your impact for families. Donate@unrefugees.org headlines.
Episode: Musk vs. Altman, and a Pivotal Immigration Case at the Supreme Court
Date: April 29, 2026
Host: Tracy Mumford
Contributors: Javier Hernandez, Cade Metz
This episode delves into three major stories shaping the day's news:
Throughout, the episode captures legal, political, technological, and cultural developments with insights from New York Times reporters.
[00:20] – [03:41]
What’s Happening:
The Supreme Court is hearing two fast-tracked cases concerning TPS—a program that lets migrants from crisis-hit countries stay and work in the U.S. The Trump administration has moved to revoke these protections, notably affecting Haitians and Syrians.
Legal Arguments:
Broader Impact:
The justices’ decisions could affect over a million current TPS holders from multiple countries, as further terminations loom.
Notable Quote:
[03:42] – [05:45]
Notable Quote:
Notable Quote:
[06:01] – [08:14]
Background:
In 2015, Sam Altman pitched Elon Musk on a nonprofit AI lab (OpenAI). Musk was an early donor. Their partnership soured, with Musk leaving the board and later launching a rival AI company, XAI.
Current Court Battle:
Musk alleges Altman betrayed OpenAI’s nonprofit, “humanitarian mission” by commercializing it and building it into a $700B tech giant without Musk's approval. He’s suing for billions and seeking to oust Altman, break OpenAI apart, and benefit his rival company.
Notable Quotes:
“Musk is claiming that Altman took his money, deceived him, and abandoned OpenAI’s original humanitarian mission…” —Tracy Mumford [06:54]
“If Elon Musk wins his case, it could shift the balance of power in the AI race… He wants to remove Sam Altman from the OpenAI board of directors. And he wants to unravel the company that oversees ChatGPT and so many other AI technologies.” —Cade Metz [07:28]
Industry Impact:
The outcome could alter the competitive landscape of AI globally.
[08:14] – [09:44]
Unconventional Hiring:
Nursing homes are recruiting bodybuilders, MMA fighters, and sumo wrestlers—offering them housing, gym memberships, and protein supplements.
Benefits:
Notable Quotes:
This episode provides a concise but sweeping overview of key legal and cultural flashpoints—from immigration battles at the Supreme Court and DC’s intensifying political-media feuds, to Silicon Valley power struggles and inventive social solutions in Japan. The brisk pacing and sharp background from Times reporters make it both informative and engaging.