
Plus, when Silicon Valley comes to the farm.
Loading summary
MultiCare Representative
For 140 years, MultiCare has been in Washington prioritizing long term solutions, partnering with local communities and expanding access to care. Together, we're building a healthier future. Learn more@mycare.org.
Will Jarvis
From the New York Times, it's the headlines. I'm Will Jarvis in for Tracy Mumford. Today's Monday, October 6th. Here's what we're covering in Washington, D.C. this morning, the Supreme Court will return to the bench for a new term that could have profound consequences for the country.
Abby Van Sickle
Usually this new term comes after a lull, a summer break where the justices are traveling and giving public speeches. But this year, there's been no break at all.
Will Jarvis
My colleague Abby Van Sickle covers the court for the Times. She says that in the past few months, as the Trump administration has pushed the bounds of presidential power, the court has churned through more than 20 emergency applications on its so called shadow docket. It's issued a number of brief rulings, often without any explanation at all, weighing in on everything from deportations to federal funding cuts. Those decisions, though, were technically just temporary placeholders.
Abby Van Sickle
So far on the emergency applications, the Trump administration has been winning victory after victory before the justices. But now this term is really shaping up to be a blockbuster because we will see how the Trump administration fares when the justices confront the central issues of his policies head on. Three of the biggest cases of the term involve Trump administration actions and policies since he returned to the White House, and those are cases about tariffs, about the president's power in firing heads of independent agencies, and a case about the Federal Reserve and whether the president has the power to fire Lisa Cook, who is one of the leaders of the Fed. We will get to see whether the justices, having handed the Trump administration all these temporary victories, actually then greenlight these policy items or whether the justices push back against the president.
Will Jarvis
Abby says that beyond the questions about the president's power, the court is also expected to weigh in on a series of other hot button issues that includes potentially revisiting a key part of the Voting Rights act of 1965 and challenges to state laws barring trans athletes from competing in women's sports.
Oregon Governor or Local Official
The facts on the ground in Oregon haven't changed. There's no need for military intervention in Oregon. There's no insurrection in Portland. There's no threat to national security.
Democratic Spokesperson
They want mayhem on the ground. They want to create the war zone so that they can send in even more troops.
Will Jarvis
Now they're claiming in Oregon and Illinois, President Trump's push to deploy troops to major cities has left governors and the courts scrambling to keep up.
Oregon Governor or Local Official
We cannot normalize the approach he is taking with the military in our own country. It's not warranted. It is unlawful. It is un American.
Will Jarvis
In Portland, which the president has portrayed as a city on fire where protesters have overwhelmed federal immigration agents, he'd moved to deploy hundreds of the state's National Guard troops. On Saturday, a federal judge who Trump appointed said that was unlawful because the protests there were, quote, not significantly violent or disruptive and that Trump seemed to have overstepped his authority to deploy the troops. The White House then tried to get around that ruling by sending troops to Oregon from California's National Guard against the wishes of both states governors. But in an emergency ruling last night, the federal judge blocked that deployment, too, accusing the administration of trying to circumvent her order. Now the Trump administration has indicated it's ready to try out another new strategy, sending hundreds of National Guard troops from Texas to Portland and to Chicago. The governor of Illinois, J.B. pritzker, said no one from the federal government had contacted him to coordinate or discuss the deployment. And he said that the administration was intentionally trying to escalate tensions in the heavily Democratic city, writing in a statement, quote, we must now start calling this what it Trump's invasion. It's now day six of the government shutdown, and there's no sign of it ending soon, with both Democrats and Republicans doubling down on their talking points.
Republican Spokesperson
Well, there's not a lot to negotiate. The Democrats just need to open up the government. Right now, we're at a stalemate.
Will Jarvis
Republicans are still laying the blame on Democrats, saying they're effectively holding the government hostage and that they need to help pass a short term spending bill. And Democrats are still saying Republicans won't come to the table to discuss their demands over health care funding.
Democratic Spokesperson
The last time there was a conversation with Republican leadership was in the White House meeting last Monday. And unfortunately, since that point in time, Republicans, including Donald Trump, have gone radio silent.
Will Jarvis
While the Senate is expected to vote again today, the House is not even in session. Majority Leader Mike Johnson has canceled votes, telling members they can stay home for the third straight week. In the meantime, the shutdown has left hundreds of thousands of federal workers furloughed with others, including TSA agents, working without pay.
Republican Spokesperson
So are these layoffs definitely happening? Because Russ Vote said on Wednesday it would happen within one to two days and still nothing. Well, again, I think that if the president decides that the negotiations are absolutely going nowhere, that there will start to be layoffs.
Will Jarvis
But I think the White House, meanwhile, has kept up its threats to carry out mass firings of federal workers during the shutdown, describing it as an unprecedented opportunity to dismantle federal programs.
Abby Van Sickle
Secretary Rubio, welcome back to MEET THE press. Is this now the end of the war in Gaza?
Secretary Rubio
Well, not yet. There's some work remains to be done, and I would view it in the.
Will Jarvis
Middle east today, Israel and Hamas will begin a new round of negotiations as the prospect of a ceasefire deal is still up in the air. The two sides will meet in Egypt, talking through intermediaries just a few days after Hamas indicated that it was open to releasing hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners. It's all part of a sweeping peace plan outlined by the Trump administration that Israel says it's accepted. Under that plan, at least 20 living hostages and the bodies of about two dozen others would be exchanged for 250 Palestinian prisoners held in Israel and 1700 Gazans detained during the war. Even beyond the discussions about a prisoner swap, though, the talks are expected to be fraught. Hamas has so far been unwilling to agree to a key Israeli demand that it lay down its weapons and give up power in Gaza.
Secretary Rubio
How do you disarm any sort of terrorist groups that are going to be building tunnels and conducting attacks against Israel? How do you get them to demobilize all that work? That's going to be hard, but that's critical because without that, you're not going to have lasting peace.
Will Jarvis
And finally, the Times has been covering the rise of precision farming, where cutting edge technology has increasingly become an essential part of agriculture. Starting in the 90s and early 2000s, satellite imagery helped change the way farmers did their work. And in the past few years, the vast majority of America's large farms have leaned into futuristic tech like auto steering tractors and cameras that help measure how crops are growing. Recently, that Silicon Valley influence has also been taking hold among livestock farmers. A growing number are now using digital collars that track their animals health. Think of it kind of like a Fitbit or an Apple watch, but for a cow. The WI fi equipped collars have motion sensors that measure chewing to help track digestion. When something's off, it sends an alert with the cow's biometric data to the farmer, letting them get ahead of any potential illnesses. One dairy farmer in South Dakota said the collars had let her farm expand its herd from 2,700 cows to 5,000 without hiring any more workers and had also boosted the amount of milk each cow produces. Another farmer in Merced, California, told the Times the callers let him and his team adjust ingredients in the cows feed down to the ounce to help keep them healthy. The collars, he said, are, quote, the closest thing we can get to talking to the cows. Those are the headlines today on the Daily A look at White House Budget Director Russell Vogt, the man at the center of the Trump administration's push to reshape the federal government. You can listen to that in the New York Times app or wherever you get your podcasts. I'm Will Jarvis. We'll be back tomorrow.
Podcast: The Headlines (The New York Times)
Host: Will Jarvis (in for Tracy Mumford)
Date: October 6, 2025
This episode focuses on a pivotal new term for the U.S. Supreme Court, the Trump administration's confrontational use of presidential power—particularly around troop deployments in U.S. cities—and the continuing government shutdown. Additionally, the show touches on ongoing Israel-Hamas ceasefire negotiations and a feature on technological advances in precision agriculture.
Main Theme:
The Supreme Court’s new term could profoundly shape national policy, particularly regarding President Trump’s recent executive actions.
No Breather for the Court:
Abby Van Sickle explains the Court hasn't had its usual summer downtime, being occupied with over 20 emergency applications (the “shadow docket”), many benefiting the Trump administration.
Major Cases Ahead:
Three significant cases center on Trump’s executive powers:
Issues Beyond Presidential Power:
Main Theme:
President Trump’s attempts to deploy military troops in Portland and Chicago have sparked backlash from state governors and ignited legal challenges.
Governors’ Pushback:
Federal Court’s Intervention:
Circumvention Attempts:
Escalation to Illinois:
“We must now start calling this what it is: Trump’s invasion.” (Gov. J.B. Pritzker, paraphrased in statement, 03:55)
Main Theme:
The government shutdown continues, with partisan finger-pointing, halted legislative progress, and mounting uncertainty for federal workers.
Blame Game:
Legislative Inertia:
White House Threats:
Main Theme:
Israel and Hamas are engaging in renewed negotiations over a ceasefire, shaped by the Trump administration’s peace proposals.
Hostage & Prisoner Exchange:
Analysis:
“How do you disarm any sort of terrorist groups that are going to be building tunnels and conducting attacks against Israel?... That’s critical because without that, you're not going to have lasting peace.” (Secretary Rubio, 07:01)
Main Theme:
Modern agriculture is experiencing a technological renaissance, with digital monitoring of livestock reshaping efficiency and animal welfare.
Rise of Digital Collars:
Impact:
Abby Van Sickle on Supreme Court:
"We will get to see whether the justices... greenlight these policy items or whether the justices push back against the president." (01:55)
Oregon Governor:
"We cannot normalize the approach he is taking with the military in our own country. It's not warranted. It is unlawful. It is un-American." (03:01)
Gov. J.B. Pritzker (Illinois):
“We must now start calling this what it is: Trump’s invasion.” (03:55)
Secretary Rubio on Gaza peace:
“How do you disarm any sort of terrorist groups... That’s critical because without that, you're not going to have lasting peace.” (07:01)
Dairy farmer on tech:
“[Digital cow collars are] the closest thing we can get to talking to the cows.” (~08:00)
This episode offers a brisk yet substantive overview of crucial events at the intersection of law, politics, and technology, with in-depth analysis from Times reporters, direct statements from political leaders, and pointed reporting on the rapid transformation of American agriculture. The episode’s journalistic tone is engaged but even-handed, prioritizing clarity and context through a blend of expert insight and on-the-ground reporting.