
Plus, how money to protect pandas is really spent.
Loading summary
Tracy Mumford
Many folks feel anxious about the threat of climate change, but there is a major clean energy opportunity emerging as a winner for everyone. It's a way to make significant progress quickly. Geothermal Energy Project Innerspace is working to make this unique societal moment an inflection point for energy and climate into the moment to bring this massive clean energy source into the mainstream. In disruption, there's opportunity. Join the geothermal movement at www.projectinterspace.org and click Contribute. From the New York Times, it's the headlines. I'm Tracy Mumford. Today's Wednesday, December 4th. Here's what we're covering.
Douglas Schorsman
I'm Douglas Schorsman and I lead coverage of Asia for the New York Times. I'm based in our newsroom in Seoul, South Korea. And yesterday seemed to be a pretty calm day and pretty quiet. And then it really was not. Around 10:30pm all of a sudden, out of nowhere, the president, Yoon Suk Yeol, was suddenly on national television declaring a state of martial law. And this wasn't aimed at a foreign power. It was aimed at his own political opponents at home in a very chilling way.
Tracy Mumford
In a shocking announcement, the highly unpopular president of South Korea, Yoon Suk Yeol, accused his opponents of overthrow the country's democracy. And he appointed an army general to ban all protests and political activities and to take control of the media.
Douglas Schorsman
The timing of the decision has struck most as being impulsive and probably not fully baked before he made his move. My colleague Choi Sung Hoon has talked to people who know President Yoon and have been with him recently, and they describe him as a man who is becoming despondent as he grew more politically isolated in recent weeks, demonstrations calling for his impeachment had been growing day by day. Scandals were piling up on him and his wife. Suddenly, he steps to the mic and shocks nearly everyone. The last time martial law was declared here was 1980, and that was while the military was still ruling and soldiers cracked down on protesters and killed hundreds of them. It scarred a generation that is still very politically active now. And suddenly for them, it all seemed to be playing out again.
Tracy Mumford
Doug says that after the president's announcement came down, it became a race to reach Seoul's National Assembly. Troops headed there, some by helicopter. So did thousands of protesters, defying the army. Lawmakers, including some from Yoon's own party, rushed toward the building to try and overturn the martial law decree.
Douglas Schorsman
All they needed was a majority to do it, but they needed a quorum. Inside the national assembly, the police were trying to hold off protesters, but Some lawmakers actually climbed barricades so they could get inside, and in the end, the soldiers didn't make it there until it was too late. The vote had happened before they could force their way all the way in. And Yoon, he saw it was going against him. He called off the troops, he rescinded the martial law declaration, and now the assembly has already moved to impeach him. That process is underway.
Tracy Mumford
In the end, martial law only lasted for six hours, but it has tipped South Korea on its head. Protesters from around the country have gathered in central Seoul to call on Yoon to resign, and the official vote on whether to impeach him could come as soon as tomorrow. This morning, the Supreme Court will hear arguments over a Tennessee law that bans medical treatments for transgender youth. It's the first time the justices are considering the constitutionality of this kind of law, and it comes as Republican led state legislatures across the country have pushed to limit transgender rights. The Tennessee law in question prohibits several types of medical care for transgender minors, puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and gender transition surgeries. Supporters of the law say they're trying to protect minors from making choices they may not be able to fully grasp. But many American medical groups have endorsed youth gender treatments as evidence based and necessary. Three families and a doctor have sued to challenge Tennessee's ban, saying it discriminates against transgender people based on sex. The court's eventual ruling in the case, which isn't expected until June, could affect not only Tennessee, but about two dozen other states with similar bans.
Emily Cochran
I've been speaking to families, parents, transgender children and transgender adults over the last couple weeks. Many of the families wouldn't speak unless they were given some form of anonymity because some of the families have been called child abusers or groomers for trying to understand or seek out this care for their child. Others have received death threats and harassment.
Tracy Mumford
My colleague Emily Cochran has been reporting on how the law, which went into effect last year, has affected families with transgender children in Tennessee.
Emily Cochran
Some families decided they needed to leave right away as a way of ensuring that they could continue to get care for their child or even have the option of considering care for their child. There are some families who have chosen to stay. They feel that if they use airplane miles or maybe trim the Christmas budget a little bit, they can cover the expenses of going to a state where it is still possible to receive gender affirming care for minors. One family told me they waited months just to get appointments in Ohio, and then that state passed a similar ban to the one in Tennessee, forcing them to move their care a second time, this time to the East Coast. And with the Supreme Court hearing today, I think a lot of these families are worried that a ruling upholding the ban could further embolden state legislatures and the incoming Trump administration to pass even tougher laws aimed at transgender people and where they're getting care.
Tracy Mumford
In political news this morning, the last House race of the 2024 election has now been called. Democrat Adam Gray beat out a Republican incumbent in California's Central Valley by just 187 votes. With that seat flipped for Democrats, the final count in the House starting next year will be 215 Democrats to 220 Republicans. Looking at Donald Trump's picks for his administration, his choice to lead the dea. The Drug Enforcement Administration has withdrawn his name from consideration only three days after getting picked. Chad Chronister, a county sheriff in Florida, had come under attack from some of Trump's own supporters for his vigorous enforcement of COVID 19 rules during the pandemic. And DEA agents had been circulating a video of Chronister's son rapping about a stabbing that he served prison time for. In a statement, Chronister said he changed his mind about accepting the nomination after, quote, the gravity of this very important responsibility set in. Also yesterday, Trump's transition team announced that it had belatedly signed an agreement to allow the FBI to conduct background checks on Trump's picks for senior roles in his administration. They'd previously floated bypassing the FBI altogether and doing background checks through private investigators instead. Still, the FBI background checks that they've agreed to are voluntary, so Trump's picks will get to choose if they want to go through one. It will likely be up to the Republican majority in the Senate to decide if they'll insist on seeing completed background checks before they vote to confirm a nominee. And finally, for decades, one of the most popular attractions at American zoos has been the pandas. They're objectively the country's cutest diplomats. And they're officially now on US Soil. Three year old Bao Li walking into his new home for the first time. Qing Bao, also three years old in her new pool with a big yawn after her long journey from China. The zoos get pandas from China through what's billed as a conservation program. Zoos pay millions of dollars for the opportunity to host the charming mammals. And that money is specifically designated for conservation efforts in China. The US Has a federal law requiring that, but the Times has discovered that is not what's happening.
Mara Vistendahl
What I found shocking was how often the money was spent on things that really had very little connection to conservation.
Tracy Mumford
In the w. My colleague Mara Vistendahl tracked the money and how it's been spent.
Mara Vistendahl
Money was going to things like apartment buildings and museums and office supplies, computers, fax machines, copy machines, and also infrastructure, roads, bridges. Some of these were on reserves, but a lot of them were nowhere near nature reserves.
Tracy Mumford
In total, Mara reviewed over 10,000 pages of records, including documents American zoos submitted to the U.S. floor and Wildlife Service, which is responsible for regulating panda exchanges.
Mara Vistendahl
You know, from looking through these, it became clear that even as zoo administrators had no idea where the money was going, they were keen on keeping the pandas. You know, pandas really put zoos on the map. They bring them a lot of prestige. And the regulators did make some effort to check where funding went, but ultimately they kind of gave up. And, you know, in talks in China, they agreed to weaken their oversight. This is an issue that's come up with other species with tigers and elephants, where animal rights groups allege that the U.S. fish and Wildlife Service does not do enough to check that conservation money is going where it's supposed to. But pandas are supposed to be kind of the flagship conservation program. And yet we found the race. Regulators pass the buck.
Tracy Mumford
Those are the headlines today on the Daily how the team that Trump has handpicked to slash government spending, Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, actually plan to do it. That's next in the New York Times audio app, or you can listen wherever you get your podcasts. I'm Tracy Mumford. The headlines will be back tomorrow with my colleague Amelia Nuremberg.
The Headlines Podcast Summary Hosted by The New York Times – December 4, 2024
Douglas Schorsman, lead Asia correspondent based in Seoul, South Korea, reports a dramatic shift in the nation's political landscape. On the night of December 3rd, President Yoon Suk Yeol made an unexpected declaration of martial law via national television at approximately 10:30 PM. This unprecedented move was not in response to foreign threats but was aimed squarely at suppressing his domestic political opponents.
Tracy Mumford highlights the severity of the situation:
"In a shocking announcement, the highly unpopular president of South Korea, Yoon Suk Yeol, accused his opponents of overthrowing the country's democracy. He appointed an army general to ban all protests and political activities and to take control of the media." (01:22)
The timing of Yoon's declaration has raised questions about its spontaneity and the president's state of mind. Reports from insiders suggest Yoon is increasingly despondent and politically isolated, facing growing impeachment calls amid mounting scandals involving him and his wife.
The martial law declaration sparked immediate chaos as troops and thousands of protesters converged on Seoul's National Assembly. Lawmakers from Yoon's own party joined the protest, aiming to overturn the decree. Schorsman notes:
"Inside the national assembly, the police were trying to hold off protesters, but some lawmakers actually climbed barricades so they could get inside, and in the end, the soldiers didn't make it there until it was too late. The vote had happened before they could force their way all the way in." (02:51)
Ultimately, the martial law lasted only six hours. President Yoon withdrew his declaration after the assembly moved swiftly to impeach him. Mumford summarizes the aftermath:
"Martial law only lasted for six hours, but it has tipped South Korea on its head. Protesters from around the country have gathered in central Seoul to call on Yoon to resign, and the official vote on whether to impeach him could come as soon as tomorrow." (03:26)
The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments regarding a contentious Tennessee law that bans several medical treatments for transgender minors. This marks the first time the Court will evaluate the constitutionality of such legislation, amidst a nationwide trend of Republican-led states enacting similar restrictions.
The Tennessee law prohibits puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and gender transition surgeries for transgender youth. Proponents argue the measures protect minors from making irreversible decisions, while opponents, including major American medical groups, assert that these treatments are evidence-based and essential for the well-being of transgender youth.
Emily Cochran, who has been extensively reporting on this issue, provides personal insights:
"Many of the families wouldn't speak unless they were given some form of anonymity because some of the families have been called child abusers or groomers for trying to understand or seek out this care for their child." (04:48)
Families have been forced to relocate to access necessary medical care, with some moving multiple times due to evolving state laws. The impending Supreme Court decision is anticipated to have far-reaching implications, potentially influencing policies in approximately two dozen states with similar bans.
In the realm of U.S. politics, Tracy Mumford reports that Democrat Adam Gray narrowly defeated a Republican incumbent in California's Central Valley by just 187 votes. This victory shifts the House balance to 215 Democrats and 220 Republicans, setting the stage for the next congressional session.
Former President Donald Trump faces challenges in his administration appointments. His nominee for the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) leadership position, Chad Chronister, withdrew his candidacy three days after being selected. Chronister cited concerns over the "gravity of this very important responsibility" amid backlash from Trump's supporters over his strict enforcement of COVID-19 measures.
Additionally, Trump's transition team has conceded to conducting FBI background checks for senior administration roles, a move that was previously considered for bypassing in favor of private investigators. These background checks remain voluntary, leaving it to the Senate's Republican majority to determine if they will require completed checks for confirmation.
A significant investigative report by Mara Vistendahl uncovers misallocation of funds intended for panda conservation in American zoos. While pandas are celebrated as "the country's cutest diplomats" and symbolize successful conservation efforts, Vistendahl discovered that funds designated for conservation have often been diverted to unrelated expenses such as apartment buildings, museums, office supplies, and infrastructure projects.
Vistendahl explains:
"Money was going to things like apartment buildings and museums and office supplies, computers, fax machines, copy machines, and also infrastructure, roads, bridges. Some of these were on reserves, but a lot of them were nowhere near nature reserves." (09:12)
An extensive review of over 10,000 pages of records revealed that both zoo administrators and regulators, including the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, failed to ensure that conservation funds were appropriately allocated. This negligence not only undermines conservation efforts but also calls into question the integrity of animal exchange programs.
Tracy Mumford concludes:
"Pandas are supposed to be kind of the flagship conservation program. And yet we found the race. Regulators pass the buck." (09:44)
Today's episode of The Headlines delved into significant global and domestic issues, from political upheaval in South Korea and critical Supreme Court hearings on transgender rights to contentious U.S. political maneuvers and alarming conservation fund mismanagement. These stories underscore the complex interplay of politics, social issues, and environmental stewardship shaping our world today.
For more in-depth coverage, listen to the full episode on the New York Times Audio app or your preferred podcast platform.