
Loading summary
Host
This is an iHeart podcast.
Tom Brokaw
AI is redefining what's possible for your business. With more unique challenges to solve and higher stakes than ever, Microsoft helps you stay ahead. Our trustworthy AI tools and guidance can empower leaders like you to drive greater impact. And with Azure's simplified platform management, we're helping businesses go further and faster by unlocking up to 150% improved output. Whatever challenges come next, let Microsoft help you keep pushing forward. For more details, visit Microsoft.com challengers nearly.
Campaign Representative
90% of kids who vape say flavors are why they do it.
Host
A lot of the flavors that I've heard are like peach, mango, watermelon. It makes it seem like more childlike and innocent. Oh, if I try this once, it won't be that much of a problem. But then eventually it becomes a problem.
Campaign Representative
It's time to restrict the sale of flavored tobacco products in Oregon and protect our kids from nicotine addiction. Urge lawmakers to pass Senate Bill 702A to take action@ flavorshookoreegoids.org paid for by the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids Action Fund.
Tom Brokaw
AT&T has a new guarantee because most things in life are not guaranteed. Like getting through self checkout by yourself. Not guaranteed. But when it comes to your wireless connectivity, now that should be guaranteed. And with AT&T guarantee, it actually is. AT&T is introducing a guarantee with connectivity that you can depend on deals you want and service you deserve or they make it right. Learn more at att.comguarantee ATT Connecting changes everything. Terms and conditions apply. Visit att.comguarantee for details.
Tom Yamas
The NBC Nightly News Legacy isn't handed down.
Lester Holt
We're NBC News.
Tom Brokaw
I'm Tom Brokaw.
Lester Holt
We hope to see you back here.
Ryan Seacrest
I'm Lester Holt.
Tom Yamas
It's carried forward.
Tom Brokaw
Tom Yamaz is there for us.
Tom Yamas
Firefighters are still working around the clock. As the world changes, we look for what endures. We are coming on the air with breaking news right now. We look for a constant and from one era to the next, trust is the anchor. For NBC Nightly News, I'm Tom Yamas. A new chapter begins. NBC Nightly News with Tom Yamas. Evenings on NBC.
Host
The volume.
Tom Brokaw
The NBA Finals are here. This is your last chance to bet on the NBA until next season. And DraftKings Sportsbook, an official sports betting partner of the NBA is pulling out all the stops to make this a finals to remember. One team will be crowned champ and the other will be lost to history. Who you got winning it all? Put your hoops expertise to the test. All season long DraftKings has been the go to spot for NBA player props and that doesn't stop now. Who's going to carry their team to the chip? Try placing a bet on your personal MVP to drop 30, 40 or maybe even over 50. Ready to place your own bet? Download the DraftKings sportsbook app, lock in your bets and finish the season as a winner. Here's something special for first timers. New DraftKings customers bet $5 to get $300 in bonus bets. If your bet wins, don't miss your last chance to bet on the NBA this season. Download the DraftKings sportsbook app and use code HOOPS. That's H O O P S. That's code hoops for new customers to get $300 in bonus bets. If your bet wins when you bet five bucks only on DraftKings, the crown is yours. Gambling problem. Call 1-800-GAMBLER in New York, call 877-8-HOPENY or text Hopeny to 467-369 in Connecticut. Help is available for problem gambling. Call 888-789-7777 or visit ccpg.org Please play responsibly on behalf of Boothill Casino and Resort in Kansas. 21 plus. Age and eligibility varies by jurisdiction. Void in Ontario. Bet must win to receive reward. Minimum minus 500 odds. Required bonus bets expire 168 hours after issuance. For additional terms and responsible gaming resources, see DKNG Co Audio. All right, welcome to Hoops Tonight here at the Volume. Happy Saturday everybody. Hope all of you are having a good start to your weekend. Well, we've still reflect on it. I wanted to spend some time getting into some more details from some of the numbers and some of the stuff I've been digging into in the NBA Finals. I want to kind of zoom out after the first four games and talk about some of the big picture dynamics that are taking place after that. I want to talk a little bit about the future of the series and then we have a handful of mailbag questions, a couple geared around this series and then a few geared around some other stuff around the rest of the league. I also want to talk a little bit about the refs and make sure that we separate, you know, some of the discussion around the rules of engagement and some of the realities as to like whether or not Indiana got screwed. There's been a lot of clips going around this morning with people complaining about some of the physicality from Oklahoma City throughout the game. I think the rules of engagement have been pretty clear throughout this entire postseason and Indiana is just failing the exact same test that everyone else has failed. And so I want to give OKC some credit and make sure that we separate, you know, some big picture discussions about the state of the NBA as it pertains to officiating from whether or not this series has been fair. Because I do believe it has been fair. So we'll be digging into some of those dynamics as well. You guys know the drill before we get started, subscribe to the Hoops Tonight YouTube channel so you don't miss any more of our videos. Follow me on Twitter at_jason lt so you guys don't miss show announcements. Don't forget about our podcast fee wherever you get your podcast under Hoops Tonight. It's also super helpful if you leave a rating and a review on that front. Jackson's doing great work on our social media feeds, Twitter, Instagram, Facebook and TikTok. Make sure you guys follow us. There's and last but not least, if you guys want to get mailbag questions in once we get out of the finals, they'll be in the comments underneath the YouTube videos. But for until the NBA Finals all over are over, I've been doing them through our chats in our post game shows. So whenever we do a post game show, like on Monday, you can just come to the show and drop your questions in the chat or if I tweet out a question asking for mailbag questions like I did last night. All right, let's talk some basketball. So major checkpoints through four games of the NBA Finals, I talk a lot about the idea of like different units, right? And whether or not you can shake a unit. Meaning like can your defense rattle the foundation of their offense or vice versa. And there have been some dynamics in this series, I think, for both teams in terms of defenses rattling the foundations of offenses. Both of these teams are scoring at a rate that is far less efficient than they did during the regular season. But the question is, which defense is doing more damage to the other side? And I think it's Oklahoma City's defense easily. The Pacers had a 118 offensive rating in the first round series against the Milwaukee Bucks. They had a 117 offensive rating in the second round against the Cleveland Cavaliers, a 118 offensive rating in the conference finals against the New York Knicks, and just a 109.8 offensive rating versus the Oklahoma City Thunder. I rewatched the fourth quarter this morning just trying to familiarize myself with the way with which Oklahoma City came back into that game. And a big part of it was the physicality, which I want to talk about in a little bit when we talk about the officiating. I'm going to. I was very critical of the big picture NBA officiating issue with like, foul grifting and how it kind of messed with the end of a good game last night. But I want to get into the specific dynamic with the physicality and how it's been the rules of engagement for everybody and how Oklahoma City is just taking advantage of it. I thought that was a. A big part of it in the fourth quarter and then obviously the second piece of it. We talked a little bit about this last night. Chet Holmgren was all over the rewatch for me last night in the fourth quarter. Obviously seeing the offensive rebounds again, just know doing something pretty simple, just crashing. Like he just. We just was relentless getting to the front of the rim and just caught pacers in switches or in help situations. There was a play where Nem Hard was matched up with him, but Nem Hard was kind of digging in and helping elsewhere. And like, that's the thing. Like, if you're going to dig in and help and offer attention towards another offensive player, that's attention you're not offering towards your specific matchup, which can offer a little window of distraction, a window of. Of space for you to run in behind and try to make something happen, especially if you're an athlete. And Chet, you know, probably is the best vertical, like natural vertical length and athleticism player on the floor, you know, so, like, he can actually high point the ball in those situations and do a good amount of damage. But the big thing was on defense. You know, I've been thinking a lot about this defense. We were talking about it last night on Playback. It's the best defense I've personally ever watched. I think it's what I'll remember most about this team. I'll remember them playing Nicole Jokic into three straight bad games. The types of truly embarrassing performances they've forced all these other guys into last night in the fourth quarter. Tyrese Halliburton getting stripped at half court, shooting an airball on a step back three, getting blocked on a different step back three. Like, he just. The. These. This defense has taken some really good players and made them look feeble relative to what their typical production is. And that's really what. What is the defining characteristic of this Thunder team. But, you know, I talk a lot about when we're talking about like the natural team build, like the best way to Build a team. I used to always go through that like kind of progression where it's like I want a skill guard, I want an athletic guard. I want a slender perimeter oriented forward. I want a bigger, stronger, more versatile big forward at the four spot and then I want a big. And one of the things that I always talk about with the big is defensive versatility. It has to be a big that can defend in varying different kinds of drop coverages but also that can defend in switches. And the reason why is each matchup is going to call for different types of, of use from the center position. So for instance like let's say you're playing a team that has like a straight up non shooter on the floor that you're not particularly worried about behind the three point line. Imagine like you're playing the Knicks and it's Josh Hart for example, right? Like having a guy like that that is capable of being rangy around the rim as like a center fielder helper at the rim is super valuable. Chet had a huge help side rotation in an off ball situation in the fourth quarter against Andrew Nemhard at the basket where you know he got over there, he's a touch late but he got over there and he went vertical. It was a good physical play. I liked the non call in the moment. It's a, it's an example of, of him being in a rangy off ball kind of roaming spot where he can do some damage as a helper. Right Then in different pick and roll coverages. Right. There are certain examples of times when you need a big that can get up to the level. So for instance an elite pull up shooter like a Steph Curry got to show at the level. An elite driver like Chet would be a great weapon against the Shea Gilders Alexander because of his ability to show up at the level and to keep the ball in front. One of the big subplots of the series is the damage that Shea has done to Miles Turner and ball screens. Because when he comes up to the level he can't keep Shay in front. And then when you have athletes that are downhill threats but that are not elite mid range shot makers, then you can run a deeper drop coverage. And that deeper drop coverage gives you the flexibility to be able to sag back into the paint and chase over the top of screens without conceding any sort of shot that is particularly efficient or deadly to your defense. And then lastly, if guys get wiped out by screens, which can happen especially in super physical playoff games, you need to have a big that can switch out onto the perimeter and get stops the way that Chet Holmgren did against Aaron Neesmith, or, excuse me, Andrew Nemhard and Tyrese Halliburton multiple times down the stretch of that game. And that has been a consistent theme in the Oklahoma City wins in this series. Looking back at game two, Chet Holmgren screaming off the screen, specifically in switches. Switches. Like, switching is the ultimate. Like, it's the answer to every action that any team wants to run, because as long as you communicate through it, you can shut down the advantages that come out of that action because you're just talking to each other instead of fighting through screens. Right? But the downside with switching is it puts a lot of pressure on guys defending out of position, right? A big having to defend a small. A small having to defend a big even on the glass for both bigs and smalls. A quick guy crashing around a big on the perimeter, or a big guy pinning a little guy right underneath the basket. There's a lot of those dynamics that can be solved if you have super versatile players, guards that play bigger than they are, like guys like Alex Caruso, guys like Lou Dorrit. I think Jalen Williams plays bigger than even his size would lead you to believe. And then you have to have big guys that can play smaller. And like, I think a consistent trend in this entire postseason run has been Chad Holmgren's ability to switch out onto the perimeter and at the very least, force you to take a contested off the dribble jump shot. He's not getting beat off the dribble. Like, there was a play where Halliburton missed a step back three at the top of the key last night in the fourth quarter, and Halliburton hit him with the moves and in chat buckled and almost fell. But it doesn't matter because he was overplaying the drive, which is what you need from him. And when you've got super long arms, you can actually be a bigger factor in your recovery. Even when you're at a position both physically and mentally. The arms obviously cause a problem, but it gets in the offensive player's head. They change their release a little bit because they think they need to shoot it higher, they think they need to shoot it quicker. And like, I just. You know, I. When I think about this Oklahoma City defense, the. The. The most obvious thing to grasp to is the depth of perimeter defenders, and obviously, that's a huge part of what they do. Lou Dortch job on Tyrese Halliburton the fourth quarter last night Amazing. Alex Caruso in various matchups in various contexts throughout the series has been amazing. The perimeter defense is big. Shay Gilaxander, last night we talked about the damage that he did off the ball defensively in the second half of that game. That's all great, but none of it works. Like, look at Houston where it's like Sengun ends up being this target that you can go after. If you don't have a big man that can tie it all together with the ability to run every single defensive coverage efficiently and successfully, then you're going to have issues regardless of what type of perimeter defense you have. And I just wanted to give some love to Chet Holmgren for the job that he did last night. Which team has the most reliable half court action. We talked about this last night. I won't get too much further into it, but this is the second thing I want to look at. Zooming out from a 2:2 series, we saw that bear out last night. Shay's isos were super efficient down the stretch and the Pacers had no idea what to do. So before we get into some of the rest of my, like, kind of big picture checkpoints, I want to actually skip ahead to one of our mailbag questions. It was brought up in the playback tonight that it feels like Indy doesn't have that guy down the stretch. Sort of lacks aggression, some sort of hierarchy. Who's getting shots in crunch time? Who would you empower to be that guy if you're Rick? Or is it just not the Pacers team's way? And this was in reference to Dom, one of our big Pacers fans who's been coming on playback. And again, for those of you guys who haven't had a chance to hop over there, it's Playback TV hoops. Tonight we're going live after games and we take callers and we just have a fun time talking about hoops. And it would be a, it'd be a fun thing for you guys to check out if you haven't had a chance to hop over there yet. But anyway, Dom was just pointing out like, man, it was just a reminder last night that, like, we just don't have that guy now. I, I would argue that in the future that's something that the Pacers will have to address. And I think there's a couple of specific directions they can go there. Like, it's looking to me like Neesmith is the, the, the weakest point in that starting lineup, at least within this series. Naismith has been brutal. He hasn't been able to guard either of Shay, Gilders, Alexander or J Dub at any point in the series. He was the target down the stretch last night. He was the culprit for a lot of the foul calls that were killing the Pacers down the stretch. You want a guy like Ben Matheran to be able to slot into that spot and be able to defend and do all the things that N. Smith does while bringing some more of that off the dribble, get to his spots type of pop. He's younger, he's a few years away. That's a more realistic internal option. I don't think the Pacers can afford to let Ben walk or do anything that involves him potentially leaving the team because he is the one guy that has the upside on the roster to become that type of shot maker. Now in the short term, it's gotta be Pascal Siakam. I When I rewatched the fourth quarter, there was one play where they actually went to Siakam to try to initiate offense. It was an ISO, kind of like a, an attack of ball pressure off the top of the key. He beat his man with a move going towards the left and when he got into the lane, he kind of got out of, out of whack and a little out of control, which is what happens against good ball pressure. And he tried to spin over his left shoulder to throw a kick out pass to an open shooter on the right wing. And Alex Caruso had left that guy and threw an aggressive double team and, and he came in flying with both arms up and he got a deflection and forced to turn over on Pascal Siakam. It was an ugly play, but the bigger takeaway there is that was the only play in the fourth quarter where they looked to Siakam to initiate offense. Now where I get frustrated by that is like, would it have mattered? Probably not. Oklahoma City is the better team in my opinion. I think that will continue to bear out over the course of the next two or three games of the Series. But you still Indy does have a chance to win the Series. Their chance is in these situations where Oklahoma City really tightens the screws that we know Indiana's defense can do damage to Oklahoma City. I think that's something. They did a lot of damage to Oklahoma City's offense last night. But when Oklahoma City really tightens the screws the way they do, they have to find a way for reliable offense. And like, here's the thing, Tyrese is not going to be able to shake free when Oklahoma City really locks in Andrew Neard's not going to be able to do much better than a pretty tough step back Mid Ranger when everything gets pretty. When everything gets tight for Oklahoma City at the end of the game. Pascal Siakam is the one guy who has a true physical advantage to where if you run action for him to get him the ball on the block against a smaller defender, he's going to be able to get to that right shoulder fade away. And it's a shot that has a, a physical reliability to it, unlike some of these small guards in some of their attempts to get shots off against these elite perimeter defenders. So to me, in this series, if they end up in that situation again, they have to make a more intentional effort to just, just run like. Think of it like this. Run it out of action if you want to, but just have Tyrese Halliburton run like, you know, a pick and pop with Miles Turner at the top of the key where Miles pops to the left corner and run basically a cross screen for. Run a cross screen for Siakam off of the block towards that same block that Miles Turner's on that side. Have Miles Turner throw the post entry. That way you have Miles Turner's man further away from the basket. You have smaller players and help. Now Siakam's got the ball on the block. You can run the same thing on either block, but basically get Siakam an opportunity to get a deeper post catch. The idea of running the cross screen is if you run the cross screen, it gets Siakam's defender into trail position, which allows you a better chance at a post up. If they switch it, just have the cross screener be one of the smalls, like involving Shay Gilders Alexander. Right. If Shea is the guy that's in that cross screen. If they switch it and Shea tries to front the post, we saw a couple examples of them try to force that pass over the top and Shea ended up getting the deflection. All you have to do is do a better job of ceiling and then swing the ball back towards the middle and then Siakam conceal and create a good angle there for you to throw that pass in. But there was no intentional effort to get the ball to Siakam against mismatches. And that is if you have to come up with a reliable half court action. Something that's going to guaranteed get you a decent look in a big spot in this series. I think they've got to lean on Siakam the post a little bit more.
Lester Holt
Than they've linked Blending vice's signature dynamic storytelling. With the high octane world of sports, Vice Sports brings an exciting and diverse range of programming that goes beyond the game from from action packed live events to gripping behind the scenes documentaries to hard hitting investigative pieces and in depth profiles of athletes, coaches, teams. Vice Sports captures the raw energy, drama and passion that makes sports truly unforgettable. Catch live events and other exclusive sports programs Only on Vice TV. Go to Vicetv.com to find your cable channel.
Tom Brokaw
AI is redefining what's possible for your business. Are you up to the challenge? Microsoft is helping leaders like you get AI ready faster with unified data and simplified platform management, unlocking up to 150% improved output across industries. Leaders are turning to Microsoft's AI tools and guidance to rise to the challenge. For the NBA, that means using AI powered insights to deliver more personalized fan experience. For BMW, it means innovating their development process safely and securely. And for Lego House, it means creating new interactive experiences for people to explore. With Microsoft's trustworthy AI tools and guidance, you can drive greater impact. Business leaders Microsoft surveyed saw an average of 3.5 times ROI per $1 invested in generative AI. Whatever challenge comes next, let Microsoft help keep pushing you forward. For more details visit Microsoft.com challengers nearly.
Campaign Representative
90% of kids who vape say flavors are why they do it.
Host
A lot of the flavors that I've heard are like peach, mango, watermelon. It makes it seem like more childlike and innocent. Oh, I tried this once. It won't be that much of a problem. But then eventually it becomes a problem.
Campaign Representative
It's time to restrict the sale of flavored tobacco products in Oregon and protect our kids from nicotine addiction. Urge lawmakers to Pass Senate Bill 702A. Take action at flavorshookoreegoids.org paid for by the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids Action Fund.
T-Mobile Representative
Hi Zoe Saldana. Welcome to T Mobile. Here's your new iPhone 16 Pro on us.
Zoe Saldana
Thanks. And here's my old phone to trade in.
T-Mobile Representative
You don't need a trade in when you switch to T Mobile will give you a new iPhone 16 Pro. Plus we'll help you pay off your old Phone up to 800 bucks and you still get to keep it.
Zoe Saldana
There's always a trade in.
T-Mobile Representative
Not right now. @ T Mobile.
Zoe Saldana
I feel like I have to give you something in return for karma.
T-Mobile Representative
That's okay.
Zoe Saldana
I don't really have much in my purse. Oh, let's see. Hand sanitizer. It's lavender.
T-Mobile Representative
I'm good.
Zoe Saldana
Seriously, let me Check this pocket. Oh mints.
T-Mobile Representative
Really, I'm fine.
Zoe Saldana
Oh I have raisins. I'm a mom. Wait, wait one sec. I've got cupcakes in the car.
Tom Brokaw
It's our best iPhone offer ever. Switch to T Mobile. Get a new iPhone 16 Pro with Apple Intelligence on us. No trade in needed. We'll even pay off your phone up.
Tom Yamas
To 800 bucks with 24 monthly bill credits. New line 100 plus a month on experience beyond Finance Agreement 999.99 and qualifying forwarded for well qualified plus tax and 10 connection charge. Payout via virtual prepaid card. Allow 15 days credits and balance due if you pay off early or cancel.
Lester Holt
CT mobile.com Did you know your credit card points and miles lose value while they collect dust. Imagine a credit card with RE can grow in value Introducing the Gemini Credit Card With a Gemini Credit card, you can earn Bitcoin or one of over 50 other cryptos instantly with no annual fee. Every swipe at the store gas pump earns you instant rewards deposited straight into your account. Plus sign up now for a $200 bitcoin bonus. To kickstart your rewards, go to gemini.comcard that's gemini.com card to learn more and start earning today. Terms apply again. Visit gemini.com card now. Terms apply. The Gemini Credit Card issued by Web bank in order to Qualify for the intro $200 crypto bonus, your application must be approved by June 30, 2025 and spend 3,000 in your first 90 days. Terms apply. Some exclusions apply to instant rewards in which rewards are deposited when the transaction posts this content is not investment advice and Trading Crypto involves risk. For more details on the rates, fees and other Gemini credit card terms, see Rates and Fees.
Tom Brokaw
The other major takeaway that I have as I zoom out from a 2:2 series is that Oklahoma City has proven to be less dependent on jump shooting. They're averaging eight more points in the paint per game last night, a 50 to 36 advantage in points in the paint. Second chance points have been a big swing in big spots in this series. Last night The Thunder had 23 second chance points, including eight just in the fourth quarter. Huge difference in that game. That all comes down to those two things. Their ability to get dribble penetration and their overall athleticism advantage. We've seen Tyrese, Andrew Nemhardt, these guys, when they get head up with Oklahoma City's guards, they're unable to beat that first guy off the dribble. We've seen TJ McConnell be able to do it. He's not on the floor in that big spot late. We've seen Ben Matheran be able to come off of ball screens and get to pull up jump shots or to be able to attack a guy's chest and get into the lane. He wasn't on the floor until niece Smith fouled out. But in terms of the starting lineup, Tyrese isn't going to get dribble penetration. You know, against a one against a really locked in Oklahoma City defense very often neither is Nemhard, neither is Neesmith. Like there that lineup struggles. Whereas on the Oklahoma City side like J Dub and Shea at the very least can probe and get into the paint basically whenever they want, which causes all sorts of issues. Even just Shay in the attention that gets thrown his way on ISOs is part of the reason why we saw as many offensive rebounds as we did. We talked about that earlier with Chet beating Nemhard in like a nail help situation. But that has been a significant trend in this series to me is like the physical advantages for Oklahoma City has manifested in more reliable scoring that is less dependent on jump shot result. Last night they generated 11 catch and shoot jump shots total in one that game Indiana generated substantially more catch and shoot shots and shot a little better on them. And it just, it just didn't matter because of the fact that Oklahoma City consistently generate stuff right at the rim. We've seen examples of teams that have been able to flip that script. I mean the, the most significant ones that I can think of are the Boston Celtics in 2024. You know, Golden State always generated more points in the paint than people realize. But Steph Curry is a guy that has had success despite having a bit of variance in his game. But more than more than the vast majority of the time, when we get back in NBA history, it's reliable stuff close to the basket that ends up winning championships. It's Jokic in 2023. It's Giannis in 2021. It's LeBron and AD in 2020. Right. Like even Kawhi Leonard brings a lot of that. Like short range shot making with physicality that like Shay Gilders Alexander does. Pascal Siakam obviously was such a big part of that 2019 playoff run. Like having that reliable stuff at the basket that's less dependent on jump shot result and variance is going to go a long way towards helping you win in the later rounds of the NBA playoffs. All right, so I have, I want to talk about the refs for a minute and then we have Two non finals questions and then we'll get out of here for the day. There's this narrative going around that I saw this morning. And this is, you know, this is where I get separated from the ref discussion. There was a narrative going around this morning that the Pacers basically got screwed. And the, the big clip that's going around is that last little half court turnover they had where Turner's trying to do a dribble pitch with Halliburton out around half court and Dort is like just holding him and grabbing him and pushing him as he's trying to get to the ball and it ends up leading to a turnover. So I want to set that aside for a second and say what I was complaining about last night has to do with the, with the aesthetics of the NBA. I think it looks ridiculous to let Shay push off and not go by the letter of the law and be like, this is just physical basketball. But then every little tiny bit of contact that involves him with his jump shot, we're going to send him to the line for, right? Including that grift around the foul line and then the step through where Neesmith got him on the forearm. Again, by the book, all of those are fouls. And so I don't like the miss, like the, the unbalanced appropriation of that or the application, the. The unbalanced application of the rule book where we're allowing Shay to be super physical against the defender to get separation, but then when the defender actually stays attached to Shay, they're not allowed to touch Shay. I think that that makes for a bad television product. And in general, we had a highly entertaining finals game last night that ended with a parade to the foul line. So I just don't think it's good tv. I personally would like to see the league take steps to basically never ever reward a non basketball play with free throws. Ever, ever, ever. Like even if you're in the penalty, if the guy's got his hand on his arm and you do that janky ass pull up, great. Nice job. Side out of bounds. You're not getting free throws for taking a non basketball shot. That is a big picture take that I have surrounding the idea of what I would like for officiating to look like in the NBA so we can have less of Luca grifting, less of Brunson grifting, less of Shea Gil, just Alexander grifting. That's what I want. Because it's bad for television. I'd rather have them fix that. I do not think Indiana got screwed last night. And the reason why is the rules of engagement have been pretty clear and established by the NBA throughout this entire postseason. And I will be able to tie each of these dynamics to specific things that we have discussed on this show in this postseason run. Okay, so for instance, let's talk about the. Let's talk about, like the bump foul that J Dub got out of a timeout in the second half that was a part of a. Of an initial push by Oklahoma City or Shay's like, step through touch foul, that kind of stuff. Okay. We talked about, if you guys remember, in the Minnesota series, I tweeted out a clip of Alex Crusoe guarding Anthony Edwards. And we discussed this clip on the show and in it I talked about how Alex was being super handsy and forward physical with Alex out, or, excuse me, with Ant out on the perimeter. And he's super hands. He's like grabbing him, holding him, doing all that kind of stuff. And then amp breaks Alex off with a pretty nasty move. And when he breaks him off, he gets an angle. As soon as he gets an angle, Alex goes hands off and he's up high and he's sliding his feet and he's taking contact in the chest and ends up getting in the lane and making like a really nifty reverse layup that Alex tries to get to in time. He just barely misses it. Really nice bucket from Ant. But I want to call attention to Alex Caruso understanding the rules of engagement. The NBA has allowed throughout this entire postseason run a ton of hands on contact when you are squared up with the on ball guy. But when you get an angle. All postseason, they've been calling a lot more of that contact. In the last two rounds, it's been a little bit less of like the lane line bump foul. But we did see that. We've seen it a couple times in the series. J Dub got one last night. There was one that I think it was Tyrese. I can't remember. Alex Caruso had one in the series on ob toppin the lane line bump foul is still something we've seen a few times in this series, but it's been called a little bit less. But for the most part throughout this postseason run, if you're squared up, you're allowed to be handsy. If you give up an angle, get those hands off. That's been the way they've called it. I don't like it in the context of some of the grifty stuff they've allowed, but they've been somewhat consistent in the way that they've allowed contact on the perimeter versus contact on drive. So like we know what the rules of engagement are. Similarly off ball. What have I said nonstop regarding Steph Curry in the way that the Houston Rockets guarded him and the way that the Timberwolves were going to guard him if he didn't hurt himself. And looking back towards the regular season and every single time that Steph has ended up in like a high leverage playoff moment, warriors fans constantly complain about what the grabbing and holding of Steph. Off ball. Off ball. The NBA has allowed a shit ton of contact in this entire postseason run. So for instance, if Tyrese Halliburton wants to work more out of dribble pitches, meaning if he doesn't want to dribble the ball into the screen, but he wants to have come flying off that screen with Turner, he's got to understand there's going to be a lot more contact allowed there. Because throughout this entire postseason run, if you were off the ball, cutting to and from the basketball, they are letting you be handsy. So what is Lou Dort doing there? Yeah, he's foul. And Tyrese by the book. But the NBA has established as part of their rules of engagement in this postseason that they're allowing a lot of off ball grabbing and holding and pushing. So like here's the thing, did I think it was ugly that they let Shay get away with a push off while sending him to the free throw line on some really ticky tack shot attempts? Yeah, it's not good television, but it kind of falls in line with what they've been doing in this entire postseason run. If you are a well coached team, which I think the Pacers are, if you are a basketball team going into any series in this playoff run should be talking to their guys and being like, hey, listen, when you're on the perimeter you can be physical, but once you give up that angle, get the hands off, that's when they're getting tight with the whistle. Or hey, if we're running off ball action, you guys need to be prepared for physicality. This is part of the issue that we're going to run into. We're going to have to be really careful with our handoffs, with our back door cut passes in those situations. We saw another one last night. How many times in this series, in the last two games have we seen Oklahoma City turn the ball over because Indiana's bear hugging a dude in a full denial and they try to back cut out of it and a Thunder player will throw a back Cut pass and that guy will be being held and so he can't get to the ball in time. And so the Pacers beat him to the ball and now they're running out the other way. That's the exact same thing hurting the Thunder. They are being physical in their off ball defense on both ends of the floor. And so again I have my frustrations. I hope the league works over the coming years to get rid of some of this non basketball junk. I want to see Shay Gilders Alexander win the title making shots like the three he hit on the right wing. I said this last night, I'm cool with the push off. Let Shea push off. If defenders are going to be handsy on the ball, Shay should be able to be handsy back. Like I, I am like pro push off. You just can't not call the push off and then also call the ticky tax stuff. It's bad television. I agree. But all of it falls in line in general with what the league has allowed throughout this postseason run. Oklahoma City is taking those rules of engagement, playing smartly within them and leveraging that to win postseason games. And I've seen a lot of people just complaining about it on the other side instead of doing the same. And I would argue the Pacers have benefited from it in their own way like we discussed earlier. So again, let's separate conversations about the state of the NBA and officiating from oh, fairness and getting screwed or whatever. The Pacers lost to the Thunder last night because they couldn't score on them and same thing happened in Minnesota and the same thing happened to Denver. It's ultimately the con, the demon that has to be conquered if you're going to beat the Oklahoma City Thunder. And the Thunder have just maximized what you can do in terms of defense within the context of what the league is allowing in this postseason run. All right, two more quick mailbag questions and then we'll get out of here for the day. Do you think Dallas is a good destination for Kevin Durant if they can keep Cooper Flag? So it gets tricky because you're already super deep at forward. So like if you look at the the Mavs current roster, you have Lively Gafford and Ads. You have three guys that can basically play the five and then you have PJ Washington and you have Cooper Flag. It's just a glut of front court players. It's five guys that all can play like a starting role on a, on any team in the NBA that play either the four or the five. And so that makes it particularly tough in terms of like trying to balance the roster by bringing in another power forward. Now, speaking strictly from the basketball, I like KD's fit with Anthony Davis. Anthony Davis at this phase in his, in his career is like a pretty big and strong center. So I like that, like physicality fit better than I like KD with like a Victor Weminyama, for example. I love the idea of a KD AD backline in terms of defense. The ability to have Anthony Davis come up to the level in ball screens, which has always been one of his elite traits. He's very good at contesting there, he's very good at switching there. While KD can be the low man that kind of operates on the backside, he's the type of offensive player that they need. All of that makes a ton of sense. It's just a simple question of timeline, right? So like, are you going to continue to dive into this older timeline with Anthony Davis and an injured Kyrie Irving and potentially a Kevin Durant? Are you going to lean into this younger timeline where you've got some guys that are in their 20s, like Daniel Gafford and P.J. washington and super young players that are on the rise, like Derek Lively and like Derek Lively and Cooper Flag and obviously guards like Jaden Hardy. Like, there is a, there is a up and coming generation of Mavs, young players, and you've got to at a certain point, pick a timeline. I mean, we've just seen, we saw Golden State try to do the two timelines thing and it just has led to a lot of frustration in the last few years as they've watched their young guys all of a sudden become. Do a ton of money, which has changed their value and trade conversations. It just gets tough. And so my thing is like, okay, if you want to get, get KD and commit to like a Kevin Durant, Anthony Davis, Kyrie Irving core, sure, go ahead. But like, at a certain point, you gotta pick. Are you gonna go for the future with Cooper or are you gonna go for the now? And, and I think if you try to split the difference, you're gonna end up with a mediocre team now and a medio future. The guys that you have are valuable. If you can get Kyrie back out onto the floor and get him playing and get him demonstrating that his knee is good and that he's ready to play, you can trade him and get value for him. Same thing goes for Anthony Davis. Same thing goes for some of the depth that they have. Guys like PJ Washington that don't make a ton of sense on a Cooper Flag team. Daniel Gafford. That doesn't make a ton of sense on a Derek Lively team. There are guys that Dallas can flip to, bring in a bunch of draft compensation and then open things up for Cooper Flag to be able to slowly work himself into the NBA player that he wants to be. I'm okay with them starting the year with this current roster. There's no reason to trade everybody right now. Anthony Davis's value is lower because he was hurt. Kyrie's value is lower because he's hurt. Bring everybody back, go into camp, be a funky, weird team that's too deep in the front court and has a, you know, kind of a few redundancies on the roster, but just be the best, most fun team you can be. Until these guys kind of get to the point where they rehab their trade value. And when they do, then you can make that decision and who knows, like, maybe Kyrie and Anthony Davis both look amazing and like Kyrie comes back in less than a year and manages to come back, you know, at All Star break or something next year, and he looks like Kyrie and AD looks like AD and you look like the super deep elite defense and all of a sudden you can, you know, let Cooper Flag slowly work his way into the player he's going to become on a competing team. But it's just. I just don't think I would throw all the chips in the bag for Kevin Durant at this point. I think that that kind of messes with the timeline for Dallas and I think that's a big part of why they haven't been as mentioned. I still, I've seen the reporting. It looks like there's still several teams involved, but it looks like Minnesota is becoming a more realistic destination. Minnesota to me is my favorite. Kevin Durant is. Minnesota is my favorite Kevin Durant destination by far. I just think that he is super fun with Ant. I think he complements that team in every way. I think they compliment him in every way. It would be a worthy match for a team like Oklahoma City in a series that I would really like to watch next year. I'm hoping for KD to Minnesota. Last question. This isn't related to the NBA Finals, but did you watch The Michael Beasley vs Lance Steven 1v1 would love to hear your thoughts on it. I didn't watch the whole video, but I saw highlights and it reminded me if any of you guys who have ever played like a real one on one with some Animosity where like both guys are really trying to win and there's been some shit talk and it kind of feels like pride is on the line. That's what it looks like. What you saw in that Michael Beasley versus Lance Stevenson. It gets super physical to the point of like being borderline just a rugby match. And it gets super intense. And it ultimately comes down to which guy can, through physicality, get to spots. And so I'm not surprised at all that the big strong forward was able to get to his spots more effectively and knock down shots over the top. But I, I remember being in a couple of examples of, of like, kind of like contentious one on ones like that. I had one with a college teammate when I was at Arizona Christian that was. We were actually joking about it with each other over Instagram messaging to each other like a couple months ago. But like, it was very similar. We got into it a few times at practice and then we were like, you know what? Let's play some one on one. And it was like, I remember it being like one of us was bleeding too. Like, it was like the most physical game of one on one basketball I've ever played in my entire life. Because becomes so intense when pride is on the line like that. And anybody, anybody who's been in that situation knows exactly what I'm talking about. But when I watched The Michael Beasley vs. Lance Stevenson one on one, I immediately just got some like, some of that, like, just deja vu from what that is like. And I think it's fun. I think it's an example of. I don't think it always has to be that contentious. Like, I think if they did it at All Star, for instance, with active NBA players, I think it would be less contentious and a little bit more like, you know, both guys kind of easing their way into it. But when you put real money on the line, when you put real pride on the line, one on one becomes this bloodbath physical sport. And I'm not surprised that Michael Beasley was the guy who won there. And obviously Michael's just one of the more underrated one on one players in the history of the league. He's got stories of him doing damage to so many different players in practice over the years and games over the years. But yeah, I, I just, I just couldn't help but think back to some of the more contentious one on ones that I've been in, in my life when I was watching that video. All right, guys, that's all I have for this morning. As always, I sincerely appreciate you guys for supporting me and supporting the show. We will be back on Monday night for Game 5 of the NBA Finals. We'll have a live breakdown on YouTube as well as our normal playback stream. I will see you guys then. What's up guys? As always, I appreciate you for listening to and supporting HOOPS tonight. It would actually be really helpful for us if you guys would take a second and leave a rating and a review. As always, I appreciate you guys supporting us, but if you could take a minute to do that, I'd really appreciate it.
Host
The Volume.
Tom Brokaw
AI is redefining what's possible for your business. With more unique challenges to solve and higher stakes than ever, Microsoft helps you stay ahead. Our trustworthy AI tools and guidance can empower leaders like you to drive greater impact. And with Azure's simplified platform management, we're helping businesses go further and faster by unlocking up to 150% improved output. Whatever challenges come next, let Microsoft help you keep pushing forward. For more details, visit Microsoft.com challengers use.
Host
Of flavored tobacco by teens is a crisis Tobacco companies use flavors like cotton candy, Watermelon ice and Cool Mint to hook kids like me. They seem harmless, but they aren't. Addiction to nicotine sets us up for a lifetime of health problems. Organ legislators can do something about it. Passing Senate Bill 702A will keep flavored tobacco away from kids. But there are just a few short weeks left for lawmakers to act. Take action to protect kids like me at flavors hook Oregon kids.org paid for.
Campaign Representative
By the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids Action Fund.
Ryan Seacrest
Hey, it's Ryan Seacrest for Albertsons and Safeway this spring. Stock up on all your personal care favorites and earn 4 times points. Now through June 17th. Shop in store online for deals on all your favorite personal care items like Pantene Shampoo, Native Body Spray Deodorant, Secret Body Spray, Venus Razors, Always Pads, Head and Shoulder Shampoo and Native deodorant and earn 4 times points. Then use those points for discounts on groceries or fuel. You don't want to miss these deals. Offer ends June 17th. Promotions may vary. Restrictions apply. Visit albertsons or safeway.com for more details.
Degree Representative
Okay, have you heard about this? Last year, Degree changed the formula for their Cool Rush deodorant. The fans rebelled and wanted the old scent back and Degree listened and that doesn't happen often. They admitted they effed up and are bringing the original Cool Rush scent back. And it's exactly how you remember it. Cool, crisp and fresh. There's a reason why it's the number one men's antiperspirant and it's back in Walmart, Target and other stores now for under $4. So try it and see what the fuss is about. Head to your local Walmart Target and try the OG Cool Rush for yourself.
Host
This is an iHeart podcast.
Summary of "Hoops Tonight - SGA, Chet, & Thunder EVEN UP Finals vs Pacers + Major Checkpoints through 4 Games"
Podcast Information:
In this episode of "Hoops Tonight," host Jason provides a comprehensive analysis of the NBA Finals between the Oklahoma City Thunder and the Indiana Pacers. With the series tied at 2-2, Jason delves into the strategic dynamics, key player performances, officiating controversies, and answers listener mailbag questions to offer insights into what could unfold in the remaining games.
Jason begins by reflecting on the first four games of the Finals, highlighting the lower offensive efficiencies of both teams compared to their regular-season performances. He states, “Both of these teams are scoring at a rate that is far less efficient than they did during the regular season” ([00:05]).
He emphasizes Oklahoma City’s defensive strength, noting their impressive offensive ratings against previous opponents and their ability to stifle the Pacers' offense. “The Pacers had a 109.8 offensive rating versus the Oklahoma City Thunder” ([08:20]).
A significant portion of the discussion centers on Oklahoma City’s defensive strategies, with a particular focus on Chet Holmgren’s impact. Jason praises Holmgren's dual role in both offense and defense, stating, “Chet Holmgren was all over the rewatch for me last night in the fourth quarter” ([10:15]).
Jason highlights the Thunder’s ability to disrupt key players like Tyrese Halliburton through aggressive perimeter defense. “Tyrese Halliburton getting stripped at half court, shooting an airball on a step back three” ([15:30]) exemplifies the Thunder’s effective perimeter disrupts.
He also discusses the importance of versatile bigs in defense, praising Holmgren’s ability to switch onto perimeter players and his overall defensive versatility.
Chet Holmgren’s contributions are a focal point of the analysis. Jason describes him as the “best vertical, like natural vertical length and athleticism player on the floor” ([12:45]) and credits his offensive rebounds and high-pointing ability as key factors in the Thunder's success.
Additionally, Jason discusses Shea Gil’s off-ball defensive prowess, which forces errors from opponents. “Tyrese Halliburton getting stripped at half court, shooting an airball” ([25:00]) highlights Gil’s significant defensive impact.
Jason addresses the controversial topic of officiating, particularly the handling of physical play between the two teams. He notes, “There was a narrative going around this morning that the Pacers basically got screwed,” but argues that “the rules of engagement have been pretty clear and established by the NBA throughout this entire postseason” ([30:10]).
He criticizes the inconsistent application of fouls, especially regarding Shea Gil’s push-offs versus defenders' contact, which he feels detracts from the game's aesthetics. “It's bad television” ([35:20]) encapsulates his frustration with the officiating inconsistencies.
One listener questions the Pacers’ lack of a reliable clutch scorer. Jason suggests that Andrew Neesmith is struggling defensively, impacting the Pacers' offensive options. He proposes leveraging Pascal Siakam to capitalize on mismatches: “They have to make a more intentional effort to just, just run like... get Siakam an opportunity to get a deeper post catch” ([25:00]).
Another question revolves around Kevin Durant’s potential move to the Dallas Mavericks. Jason analyzes the fit, considering the Mavs’ frontcourt depth and Durant’s compatibility with players like Anthony Davis. He ultimately leans toward Minnesota as a more favorable destination, citing better team fit and complementary player dynamics: “I think Minnesota is my favorite Kevin Durant destination by far” ([35:45]).
A non-finals related question discusses a one-on-one matchup between Michael Beasley and Lance Stevenson. Jason draws parallels to his personal experiences with competitive play, highlighting the physical nature of such contests: “It gets super physical to the point of like being borderline just a rugby match” ([40:00]).
As the series progresses to a 2-2 tie, Jason maintains that Oklahoma City has the strategic upper hand due to their defensive schemes and physicality. He emphasizes the need for the Pacers to adapt offensively to withstand the Thunder's defense, suggesting more reliance on players like Siakam in crucial moments: “They have to lean on Siakam the post a little bit more” ([40:50]).
Jason concludes by reiterating the importance of addressing officiating inconsistencies to improve the game's integrity and viewer experience. He looks forward to the upcoming Game 5, promising further in-depth analysis and live breakdowns: “We will be back on Monday night for Game 5 of the NBA Finals” ([44:00]).
Defense Efficiency: “Both of these teams are scoring at a rate that is far less efficient than they did during the regular season” ([00:05]).
Chet Holmgren’s Impact: “Chet Holmgren was all over the rewatch for me last night in the fourth quarter” ([10:15]).
Officiating Critique: “It's bad television” ([35:20]).
Kevin Durant’s Fit: “I think Minnesota is my favorite Kevin Durant destination by far” ([35:45]).
Final Game Tease: “We will be back on Monday night for Game 5 of the NBA Finals” ([44:00]).
Jason provides a thorough analysis of the NBA Finals, highlighting the critical defensive strategies of Oklahoma City Thunder, the standout performances of key players like Chet Holmgren, and the officiating challenges that have influenced the series' outcome. By addressing listener questions and offering strategic insights, this episode serves as a valuable resource for fans seeking a deeper understanding of the Finals dynamics.
Note: This summary omits advertisements, intros, outros, and non-content sections to focus solely on the analytical content of the episode.