Podcast Summary: The Minnesota Fraud Scandal | An Unfiltered Conversation with Nick Shirley
Podcast: The Iced Coffee Hour
Hosts: Graham Stephan & Jack Selby
Guest: Nick Shirley
Date: January 3, 2026
Overview
In this explosive episode, Graham Stephan and Jack Selby sit down with YouTuber and investigative journalist Nick Shirley to discuss his viral exposé of alleged large-scale fraud at daycare centers in Minnesota. Within 72 hours of posting his investigation, Nick’s video garnered over 130 million views on X (formerly Twitter), rocketed into mainstream discourse, and triggered a national debate on government oversight, welfare fraud, and community accountability.
Nick delves into:
- The mechanics and scope of alleged fraud in Minnesota’s daycare and welfare systems
- Confrontations with authorities and media backlash
- Viral reactions, from billionaire support to personal threats
- The intersection of politics, immigration, and accountability in the story
Shirley’s candid, sometimes provocative perspective leads to a lively and controversial conversation about exposing fraud, the power dynamics in investigative journalism, and his personal journey through a whirlwind of internet fame and real-life risks.
Key Discussion Points & Insights
1. Genesis of the Viral Investigation
-
Scope & Reason for Virality
- “It’s the first time where Americans could really see that fraud is taking place openly and people are receiving millions of dollars and they're actually not doing anything.” (Nick, 01:01)
- Nick published a video exposing alleged systemic fraud within Minnesota daycare centers, showing empty buildings collecting government funding for nonexistent children.
- The video went viral, with 130M+ views on X and over 500M total impressions in 72 hours—a record for a non-celebrity, non-sponsored, long-form video.
-
Process & Challenges
- Nick’s investigation began in June while reporting on demographic changes in Minnesota. Local contacts urged him to look into massive welfare fraud within the Somali immigrant community.
- He connected with “David,” a Minnesota local and anti-fraud activist, who had compiled damning evidence from inside the state Capitol: “He had all the numbers. I've never seen a child at any of the daycares I drive by every year for the past seven years.” (Nick, 04:19)
2. Alleged Fraud Tactics and Systemic Lapses
-
How the Fraud Works
- Daycare operators receive government money (federal and state, via HHS and welfare) for supposedly enrolling children; these facilities, according to Nick's claims, are often deserted or non-functioning.
- “Multiple people will have violations or a history of doing crime but they'll still let them open up a daycare and then they’ll receive this federal money.” (Nick, 08:12)
- Audit processes and oversight are reported to be lax or essentially non-existent.
-
Key Figures & Community Involvement
- Nick repeatedly cites “89%” as the portion of the fraud he attributes to Minnesota’s Somali immigrant community, linking this to political incentives.
- He draws connections to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, alleging a suspicious jump in net worth (though acknowledges financial transparency is limited).
-
Lack of Accountability
- “Tim Waltz has openly said that we've been fighting fraud since 2019. Okay… How long do you think it would take for you to cut off the funding?” (Nick, 09:50)
3. Media and Political Fallout
-
Mainstream Media Response
- Major media accused Nick of racism and running a “propaganda piece,” focusing on his tactics over the substance of the alleged fraud.
- “The news is investigating the journalist versus investigating the fraudsters… CNN did a whole entire thing on me.” (Nick, 48:01)
-
Political Response
- Governor Tim Waltz allegedly “blamed Trump” for the fraud and labeled critics “white supremacists.” Nick replies:
- “I’m not… Fraud is fraud. And Tim Waltz… he's so scared to be called a racist and for speaking facts that he's allowed billions of dollars to be sent overseas and fund terrorists…” (Nick, 34:08)
- Political buck-passing and claims of racism dominate official pushback rather than engagement with the facts.
- Governor Tim Waltz allegedly “blamed Trump” for the fraud and labeled critics “white supremacists.” Nick replies:
-
Support from High-Profile Figures
- Elon Musk retweeted or referenced Nick’s story 40 times in one day; Musk privately DMed Nick to thank him for his work.
- “Yes, thanks for the work you're doing. Wow.” (Nick quoting Musk, 02:00)
- Other notable figures (JD Vance, U.S. Attorney General, Director of the FBI) publicly acknowledged the investigation.
- Elon Musk retweeted or referenced Nick’s story 40 times in one day; Musk privately DMed Nick to thank him for his work.
4. Challenges, Threats & Ethics in Modern Investigative Journalism
-
Personal Repercussions
- Doxxing, doxing of family, security risks:
- “They can't get anything on me… they're coming after people around me or my family members or they're trying to get information… People are deranged right now.” (Nick, 43:21 & 72:50)
- Security measures: bulletproof vest and bodyguards for fieldwork.
- “If it's one… If you piss off one Somali, you're pissing off the whole entire community.” (Nick, 44:55)
- “It does [make me pause]. My life has been changed over these past 72 hours. And at least for these next few months, I'm like, this is going to be a little harder to do what I got to do, but I'm not going to stop. Like, they're not going to fear me away from doing it.” (Nick, 73:12)
- Doxxing, doxing of family, security risks:
-
Internet and Media Discourse
- Nick details how X (Twitter) gave his investigation an unprecedented reach, outpacing traditional journalism.
- “On YouTube…good luck ever getting a video over a hundred million… On X, you can simply just upload and then it can get shared to everyone.” (Nick, 41:08)
- He critiques “mainstream media” as slow, bureaucratic, and beholden to their own interests vs. true investigative reporting.
- He wants transparency, especially for public officials: “Every normal person that isn't in government would agree [on financial transparency].” (Host, 16:09)
- Nick details how X (Twitter) gave his investigation an unprecedented reach, outpacing traditional journalism.
-
Ethical Questions and Copycats
- Concerns about encouraging “copycat” confrontations at daycares:
- “I actually did my due diligence… You don't want to see just a bunch of people hopping up to daycares and saying, where are the children? But people also have the right to just simply ask the question.” (Nick, 22:16)
- Concerns about encouraging “copycat” confrontations at daycares:
-
Lawsuits & Retaliation
- Nick is aware of legal risks but maintains:
- “They'll have to defend themselves as well. They'll have to prove that they're a legit business.” (53:06)
- Potential for drawn-out, resource-intensive lawsuits by exposed parties is discussed.
- Nick is aware of legal risks but maintains:
5. Solutions, Policy and Political Implications
- Nick’s Prescriptions
- Immediate freezing of all government payments until each recipient is proven legitimate.
- Surprise, unannounced inspections and robust verification requirements for all welfare and subsidy claims.
- “If Minnesota actually cared about stopping the fraud, like Tim Waltz has been saying for six years, what I would have done is surprise visits… If you're licensed for 40 children and you have 35 kids here, perfect. But if you're licensed for 40 and you have four and we're giving you a million dollars, we should probably look into this.” (Nick, 19:43)
- Bureaucratic Obstacles
- Many rules exist for fraud prevention, but enforcement and auditing are “enabled by cowardice and political incentives.”
- The Broader Picture
- Nick asserts the fraud is bipartisan at the population level, but enabled and perpetuated more often by left-leaning governments in his view:
- “Just look at Minnesota, look at California… For instance, just with the illegal immigration fraud… That was a total left wing issue.” (Nick, 51:30)
- Discusses the mechanics of how welfare fraud, NGOs, and political patronage can reinforce each other.
- Nick asserts the fraud is bipartisan at the population level, but enabled and perpetuated more often by left-leaning governments in his view:
6. The Role of Technology, Social Platforms, and a Changing Media Landscape
- Power of Decentralized Platforms
- Nick credits X (Twitter) for enabling him to bypass gatekeeping in traditional media.
- “The producers are on X… The most powerful people in the world use X.” (Nick, 42:21)
- While monetization opportunities on X are limited, reach, influence, and opportunities spike via exposure.
- Nick credits X (Twitter) for enabling him to bypass gatekeeping in traditional media.
- Impact on Institutions
- Nick predicts further erosion in trust for mainstream news and claims social media journalism, although perilous, is driving real change.
- “We've never seen something like this… within hours the government launches full on investigations into a city about fraud.” (Nick, 93:06)
- Nick predicts further erosion in trust for mainstream news and claims social media journalism, although perilous, is driving real change.
Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments
The Fraud Exposé Goes Viral
- “Over 130 million views on just the video alone on X. And then if you count all the other impressions, it did over 500 million views within 72 hours.” (Nick, 02:27)
- “The mainstream media is extremely scared because I got more views than them on one video than they get all year.” (Nick, 26:54)
Confronting the Problem
- “Just the fact that they couldn't give me any responses. They're receiving millions of dollars and I can't even get a brochure to enroll an imaginary son Joey in the daycare.” (Nick, 12:05)
- “If someone wants to try and sue me for that, they're gonna have to prove that they're not fraudulent.” (Nick, 54:50)
Viral Media and Political Deflection
- “Tim Waltz actually blamed the fraud on Trump. He said, well, Trump keeps letting fraudsters out of prison. And he blamed and deflected everything. He actually called me a white supremacist.” (Nick, 33:40)
On X’s Impact
- “On X, you can simply just upload and then it can get shared to everyone. And the most powerful people in the world use X.” (Nick, 41:08)
- “I'm getting pretty good at ratioing people like Tim Waltz on Twitter because they're speaking like idiots. And they're supporting fraud. And it turns out that the majority of the population doesn't support fraud.” (Nick, 66:21)
Personal Consequences & Resolve
- “Now it sucks because now I have to have security. I never expected to have to go film a video and have four security people…lucky security was there to stop [an attack].” (Nick, 44:29)
- “I just have to go about it in a different way. But I do have an opportunity now to really move it towards something, and I've…been wanting to do for a while.” (Nick, 74:37)
Structural Highlights & Timestamps
| Topic | Timestamp | |-------------------------------------------------|------------------| | Start of Discussion, Context | 00:33 – 01:35 | | Scope and Virality of Nick’s Investigation | 01:42 – 03:09 | | Daycare Fraud Mechanics: How it Works | 07:39 – 10:16 | | Political & Community Response | 33:40 – 34:08 | | Media Criticism & Counterarguments | 23:23 – 28:46 | | Security Risks and Personal Safety | 43:21 – 45:44 | | Reforms & Solutions | 65:47 – 67:01 | | Frauds in Assisted Living & Hospitals | 32:43 – 33:00 | | Copycat Concerns & Investigative Ethics | 21:43 – 22:59 | | Exposure and Life Changes | 70:38 – 71:54 | | Transparency for Politicians | 16:09 – 16:34 | | Broader Policy: National & Historical Context | 51:27 – 52:46 | | Media, Technology, and Platform Power | 41:08 – 42:21 | | Personal Mission & Future Plans | 93:05 – 94:48 |
Conclusion & Call to Action
Nick Shirley wraps up with a sense of mission:
“My journalism is turning into actual change… I'm here to help people and to show people what's happening for things as they really are and to show them the reality of things. The whole goal is to leave the world a better place than we received it and to create actual change.” (Nick, 93:06)
He encourages listeners to:
- Follow him across platforms for updates and future exposés
- Stay vigilant about how public funds are spent and pursue transparency and evidence in all claims
Want to dig deeper or support Nick Shirley?
- Follow him on all platforms (links in episode description)
- Engage with his ongoing investigations and content
- Stay tuned for his upcoming fraud exposés and proposed public reporting network
“At the end of the day, the whole goal is to leave the world a better place than we received it and to create actual change.”
— Nick Shirley (94:48)
