B (2:18)

Okay, that's very stark, that difference.

D (2:21)

Yeah. This is not controversial to say that it's partisan. This is what the President Donald Trump has said himself.

B (2:27)

Makes sense. But we're only cutting Democrat programs.

C (2:30)

We'll be cutting some very popular Democrat.

B (2:33)

Programs that aren't popular with Republicans, frankly, because that's the way it works.

D (2:38)

So this report is helpful because it puts a number basically to what he was saying. $27 billion of funding that was going to transportation or energy projects in Democratically controlled missing for now and only $740 million missing for Republican areas.

C (2:55)

And as far as where the money is going, what kinds of projects are we talking about here that are getting their funding cut?

D (3:01)

Yeah. So in this report, they show two big categories, transportation and energy. And on transportation, the biggest chunk is projects In New York City, the Second Avenue subway extension, also the repair of the Hudson River Tunnel between New Jersey and Manhattan. You've also got a rail extension in the south side of Chicago. And then on the energy side, the Trump administration announced earlier this month that it was terminating $7.5 billion in grants for 223 projects. This is everything from modernising energy grids to a Californian project to create clean hydrogen, which is a type of fuel produced using renewable energy. A press release from the Department of Energy said that following a thorough review, the agency determined that these projects weren't economically viable and wouldn't give a positive return on investment.

C (3:53)

I mean, that seems like a plausible explanation if President Trump had not just kind of given up the whole rationale already. Yeah, there's a difference.

B (4:04)

By calling them Democrats projects.

C (4:05)

Yes.

D (4:07)

So, yeah, it's hard to know without diving into the details of every single project's cost benefit analysis, but yes, President Trump is saying that it's basically a partisan thing. As of this recording at least. All this back and forth and brinksmanship, it doesn't seem like either the Democrats, Democrats or the Republicans are any closer to making a deal.

B (4:29)

Well, speaking of brinkmanship, I think this is a good time for my indicator, which is two, as in two words that made headlines this week. U.S. treasury Secretary Scott Besant told CNBC in an interview that the government is going to set price floors in certain industries to push back against China. Price floors. Those are the two words that made people sit up in their chairs.

C (4:53)

Price controls, price ceilings, price floors. So when government officials start throwing around these terms, that kind of gets our economic spidey senses going.

D (5:02)

Yeah, this means the government's deciding to potentially intervene in the economy, maybe playing a role in setting prices instead of letting the market decide where the prices should be.

B (5:13)

Yeah, and Scott Bessant said these kinds of policies were necessary when, quote, facing a non market economy like China, end quote. And the one industry he mentioned specifically was rare earths. He says Chinese prices for rare earths are so low that foreign producers like the US can't compete.

D (5:30)

We've covered rare earth elements on the show before. These are elements that go into high end magnets, the kind you might find in an electric vehicle motor. They are really in demand right now. And China dominates the market.

B (5:43)

Yep, China's the leader. And it's, you know, historically had loose environmental regulations around mining and processing and that's helped keep their prices low.

C (5:51)

So what would price floor on rare earths actually look like?

B (5:54)

Well, I have another indicator for you guys, which is zero. Zero details. It is unclear if Besant is saying the US Government will, like, do something to make sure Chinese rare earth prices stay above a certain level, or if it's a policy to somehow enforce a minimum price for American rare earths. It's like shrug emoji.

D (6:14)

Yeah. Because on the one hand, it's like, no, you should sell your products for more and make more money. Chinese producers, or it's something like they have an agricultural policy.

B (6:24)

Yeah. So with certain farmers in the U.S. the government doesn't exactly set minimum prices, but it has all these long running programs that give financial support to farmers if commodity prices go below certain levels. And you sometimes hear these programs described as price support.

C (6:40)

Well, it looks like the government has opened up another potential front in the trade war with China. I mean, I guess you could say that there's no ceiling to how much this can escalate.

B (6:50)

I see what you did there, Adrian.

C (6:55)

Who doesn't love a pun? I know this. Actually, my indicator of the week involves a pun too, which we'll get to.

B (7:02)

I love some wordplay.

C (7:04)

My indicator is actually inspired by a good friend of mine who is always recommending new music to me. And this week he said, you gotta check out this artist called the Professor, Nick Harrison. He does these really awesome cover songs. And for example, there is this Rage against the Machine song. Okay, so this is the original. It's called Bulls on Parade, this really hard, gritty rock song.

D (7:34)

Mm.

C (7:37)

And here is the Professor, Nick Harrison's version.

D (7:41)

They rally around the family With a pocket full of shells they rally around the family. Oh, this is meant to be a cover.

C (7:49)

Yeah.

D (7:49)

Oh, but it's like a soul version.

C (7:51)

Yes.

A (7:51)

Oh, interesting.

B (7:52)

Okay. That's a fun genre mashup, I gotta say.

C (7:56)

I don't wanna like this. I want to hate it. But I kind of enjoyed it. This vibe is, like, right up my alley. This sort of like, soul gospel thing. And it turns out the professor recently released an entire album of covers called Artificial Soul. You can find it on Spotify and Apple Music. And the name Artificial Soul is actually a pun on the word artificial, because it turns out all the songs are made using A.I. i get it.

B (8:27)

Oh, my goodness. Is this the future, Adrian? Is this the future of music?

C (8:30)

It's the present.

B (8:32)

Oh, that's true.

F (8:33)

Whoa.

E (8:34)

See?

B (8:34)

Oh, it's here.

C (8:36)

My friend was so bummed out to hear this. He didn't realize that this was like a whole AI generated album. And, you know, the thing is that AI Music is actually flooding streaming services right now. So like, who could be blamed? So a couple of interesting indicators that show the scope of this There's a French music streaming service called Deezer which recently estimated that over 30,000 fully AI generated tracks are uploaded to its site every day.

F (9:04)

Wow.

C (9:05)

And then Spotify says that the flood of AI slop is a big reason why it removed a lot of what it calls spam tracks from its platform last year, about 75 million of them.

D (9:17)

Well, a bazooka full of AI slop for your ears.

C (9:20)

This is not just a issue for music platforms, of course. It's also an issue for musicians. And while some musicians will undoubtedly find AI useful, there is an interesting study from a nonprofit that represents artists where they estimate that AI will result in musicians seeing a 24% decline in their revenue and over just the next few years.

D (9:43)

So opa, Tom Morello and the crew are getting some cash from this?

C (9:49)

Yeah.

B (9:50)

Or maybe they're just they have lots of rage against the AI machine.

C (9:54)

I mean, the irony of that being the name of the ban that's being covered by AI.

B (10:03)

Yeah, I mean, truly.

C (10:09)

This episode was produced by Angel Carreras and engineered by Robert Rodriguez. It was fact checked by Corey Bridges. Katinkanan is our editor and the indicator to production of npr.

A (10:23)

This message comes from the Council for Interior Design Qualification. Interior Designer and CIDQ President Siyavash Madani explains the value of having an NCIDQ certification.

F (10:36)

An NCIDQ certified interior designer must complete a minimum of six years of specialized education and work experience and pass the three part NCIDQ exam. All three exams emphasize and focus on health, safety and welfare of the occupants. It's really about the implementation of design. Good design is never just about aesthetics. It's about intention, safety and impact. We take the responsibility of protecting the public seriously. The space needs to be functional, safe and accessible.

A (11:10)

To learn more about NCIDQ certification or to hire a Certified Designer, visit CIDQ.org NPR this message comes from Capital One. The Capital One VentureX business card earns unlimited double miles on every purchase. Capital One what's in your wallet? Terms and conditions apply. Find out more@capitalone.com venturexbusiness.