Trump's parade, FEMA phase out, and Warner Bros. Discovery divorces ... itself?

Summary

Summary of Episode: "Trump's Parade, FEMA Phase Out, and Warner Bros. Discovery Divorces Itself?"

Podcast: The Indicator from Planet Money
Host/Authors: Waylon Wong, Darian Woods
Guest: Alexi Horowitz (Planet Money)
Release Date: June 13, 2025

In this episode of The Indicator from Planet Money, hosts Waylon Wong and Darian Woods delve into three significant economic and political developments: the hefty cost of President Trump's upcoming army parade, the potential phasing out of FEMA, and the corporate split of Warner Bros. Discovery. With insights from guest Alexi Horowitz, the episode provides a comprehensive analysis of these topics, contextualizing their financial implications within broader governmental and corporate frameworks.

---

1. The Cost of President Trump's Army Parade

Indicator of the Week: $45 million
Timestamp: [02:18]

Darian Woods kicks off the discussion by highlighting the estimated upper bound cost of President Trump's forthcoming army parade, slated to celebrate both the Army's 250th anniversary and Trump's birthday. The parade's dual purpose has attracted scrutiny from various lawmakers, predominantly Democrats, but also some Republicans. Critics question the necessity and symbolism of such a lavish expenditure, especially amidst ongoing government budget constraints.

Waylon Wong emphasizes the juxtaposition of the parade's cost against the backdrop of governmental belt-tightening efforts:
"Especially at this time of belt tightening across the government." [02:36]

Alexi Horowitz provides perspective on the parade's financial footprint within the larger defense budget:
"...it is about half a percent of 1% of the military budget." [03:10]

Darian further illustrates the magnitude by comparing $45 million to the defense budget, suggesting that this amount could fund approximately 22,000 similar parades:
"If you spent last year's entire defense budget on festivals and parades, you could have 22,000 of them." [03:39]

The conversation then shifts to the costs associated with deploying Marines to Los Angeles for protests, estimated at $134 million. When contextualized against the U.S. military's annual spending nearing a trillion dollars, these expenditures are portrayed as relatively minor:
"Even $1.5 billion would be less than a sixth of a percent of US military spending." [04:17]

Key Takeaway: While $45 million is a substantial sum at an individual or state level, within the vast U.S. military budget, it represents a negligible fraction, prompting debates on priorities and symbolic expenditures.

---

2. Phasing Out FEMA: Implications for Disaster Relief

Indicator of the Week: $30 billion
Timestamp: [04:55]

Waylon Wong introduces the discussion on FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency), highlighting its significant annual budget of approximately $30 billion. President Trump's recent statement about phasing out FEMA post-hurricane season has sparked concerns about the future of disaster relief services in the United States.

Darian Woods probes the potential consequences of dismantling FEMA:
"Are these services going away if FEMA gets phased out?" [05:26]

Waylon explains the President's vague plans, noting Trump's intention to redistribute disaster funds directly from the White House rather than through FEMA:
"We're going to give out less money. And he also said the funds would be distributed directly from the president's office." [05:15]

Alexi Horowitz raises alarms about the centralization of disaster relief funds, referencing the contentious scenario during the LA wildfires, where Trump threatened to withhold federal aid due to grievances with California's management of water resources:
"Trump had threatened to withhold federal disaster money because he was unhappy with how California was managing water." [06:01]

Further exacerbating the situation, FEMA is projected to undergo substantial staffing reductions, losing nearly 30% of its workforce by year's end. Kristi Noem, head of Homeland Security, alongside Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, are leading a council to review FEMA, hinting at significant structural changes:
"They are going to suggest changes. And based on the way she and the president have been talking, it does seem like the changes could be drastic." [06:51]

Key Takeaway: The proposed phasing out of FEMA threatens to disrupt established disaster relief mechanisms, raising concerns about the efficiency, politicization, and accessibility of future aid during emergencies.

---

3. Warner Bros. Discovery’s Corporate Split: Navigating Debt and Market Realities

Indicator of the Week: Number Two
Timestamp: [06:59]

Alexi Horowitz shifts the focus to the entertainment industry, discussing the imminent split of Warner Bros. Discovery into two separate entities. Originally formed three years ago through a merger between WarnerMedia and Discovery, the conglomerate amassed approximately $50 billion in debt to bolster its competitive stance against streaming giants like Netflix.

The initial strategy aimed to amalgamate Discovery's reality TV portfolio with HBO's prestigious programming, offering a diverse content slate to attract a broad subscriber base. CEO David Zaslav's vision was to create a "one-stop-shop" for varied entertainment genres. However, this bundling approach did not yield the anticipated synergies. Subscriber data indicates that most of Max's (Warner Bros. Discovery's streaming service) audience remains loyal to HBO's high-caliber content, with limited engagement in the reality TV segment.

Waylon Wong articulates the market's response to this strategy:
"Most of Max's viewers still seem to be signing on for HBO's prestige offering and not the wide array of reality TV shows." [08:19]

The decline in cable television's popularity further pressured the company, despite the cable and TV divisions continuing to generate revenue. To address the mounting debt, currently standing at around $37 billion, Warner Bros. Discovery has announced plans to split into two distinct companies: one focusing on cable and television services (including assets like CNN) and the other concentrating on streaming services and studio operations.

Alexi highlights the financial rationale behind the split:
"They even announced last month that their streaming platform would be renamed yet again, going back to HBO Max." [08:26]
"The debt currently stands around $37 billion, and the company said that most of that will go to the cable and TV outfit after the split." [09:16]

Key Takeaway: The decision to split Warner Bros. Discovery underscores the challenges traditional media companies face in adapting to the dynamic streaming landscape, emphasizing the need to streamline operations and manage significant debt burdens effectively.

---

Conclusion

This episode of The Indicator from Planet Money offers a nuanced exploration of fiscal decisions within both governmental bodies and major corporations. From evaluating the symbolic yet costly nature of military parades to scrutinizing potential disruptions in federal disaster management, and dissecting strategic corporate maneuvers in the entertainment sector, the discussion underscores the intricate balance between expenditure, efficiency, and strategic planning in shaping economic and societal outcomes.

Transcript

[NPR Host]

Npr.

[Waylon Wong]

This is the indicator from Planet Money. I'm Waylon Wong.

[Darian Woods]

And I'm Darian Woods. And a stone's throw from me, dancing in the dark, skulking in the shadows.

[Waylon Wong]

Is Planet Money's very own Alexi Horowitz. Ghazi.

[Alexi Horowitz]

Hello. Thank you for having me and. Hold on. Wait, I'm getting a calendar alert on my phone. What is it? So today seems to be indicators of.

[Waylon Wong]

The wizard of the week.

[Darian Woods]

So on today's show, we've got the cost of the big army parade, FEMA.

[Alexi Horowitz]

Getting phased out and a giant entertainment corporate breakup. We're talking about Warner Brothers Discovery here, guys.

[Darian Woods]

The tea will be spilt after the break.

[Guest Speaker]

This message comes from Discover. Are you still quoting 30 year old movies? Have you said cool beans in the last 90 days? Do you think Discover isn't widely accepted? If this sounds like you, you're stuck in the past. Discover is accepted at 99% of places that take credit cards nationwide. And every time you make a purchase with your card, you automatically earn cash back. Welcome to the now it pays to Discover. Learn [e-mail] credit card Based on the February 2024 Nielsen report, this message is from Spectrum Business.

[NPR Host]

From independently owned storefronts just open for business to established professional services run from large offices, Spectrum is committed to delivering connectivity solutions for any size business. Create a plan made for your business with fast, reliable Internet, TV packages, phone, mobile services and more, all backed by the Spectrum commitment. From one employee to thousands, Spectrum keeps your business connected. Learn [e-mail] business this message comes from Insperity.

[Alexi Horowitz]

Providing HR services and technology from payroll benefits and HR compliance to talent development. Learn more at insperity.com hrmatters it is.

[Waylon Wong]

Indicators of the week. Darian, you are kicking us off in style. What do you have?

[Darian Woods]

All right, so my indicator of the week is $45 million. That's the upper bound cost estimate for President Trump's army parade this Saturday.

[Waylon Wong]

Yes, we have heard of nothing else. This is the parade that celebrates the Army's 250th anniversary, but also happens to coincide with Donald Trump's birthday.

[Darian Woods]

Yeah, you're getting two parties for the price of one. Even so, various lawmakers are criticizing that price of the parade. They're mostly Democratic, but even some Republicans. They're balking at both what a military parade represents and also that they would rather save the money.

[Waylon Wong]

Right. Especially at this time of belt tightening across the government.

[Darian Woods]

Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll says that the festivities will help with recruiting. That said, the army has met its recruiting goal for the year.

[Alexi Horowitz]

So what is this party for?

[Darian Woods]

Some say it's there to boost morale for the troops. But I think what's helpful in these debates is to put that money in perspect. Like, how much is $45 million? Obviously, it's a lot of money for you and me, but how much is it for the government? One way to look at it is what is $45 million as a share of defence spending? And it's about half a percent of 1% of the military budget.

[Alexi Horowitz]

Okay, that sounds pretty small, but do you have any way to, like, visualize that?

[Darian Woods]

Basically, if you spent last year's entire defence budget on festivals and parades, you could have 22,000 of them.

[Waylon Wong]

So you have convinced me that the military parade costs are not that big in the scheme of US Government spending. But we also have the situation where the government is sending the Marines over to LA for the protests there.

[Darian Woods]

Yeah. So sending the Marines and national guard to LA is more expensive at an estimated $134 million. And if that same cost were to be replicated in every American city, over 1 million people, that would total $1.5 billion.

[Alexi Horowitz]

Okay, so that's some serious money we're talking about, and a serious situation.

[Darian Woods]

Yeah, but don't forget just how massive US Military spending has been. It's been close to a trillion dollars a year. So even $1.5 billion would be less than a sixth of a percent of US military spending.

[Waylon Wong]

We spent a lot of money on the military here in the US Indeed.

[Darian Woods]

And these costs are basically rounding errors. You can disagree with them for other reasons, but as a cost saving measure, I think they're pretty insignificant.

[Alexi Horowitz]

Moving on from big military parties, Waylon, what. What do you have for your indicator?

[Waylon Wong]

My indicator is $30 billion. That's the approximate annual budget for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, or fema. And I'm talking about FEMA today because President Trump said this week that he plans to start phasing out the agency. He said this would happen after hurricane season, which started this month and goes through November.

[Darian Woods]

Phasing out fema. So this is the agency that goes in after big disasters to help people with food and shelter and financial assistance. Are these services going away if FEMA gets phased out?

[Waylon Wong]

Well, the President talked about FEMA in a press briefing at the White House, and there weren't that many details. But Trump did give some clues as to what he's thinking. He said, we're going to give out less money. And he also said the funds would be distributed directly from the president's office. This would be a change from how FEMA currently operates right now. When the president declares a disaster, FEMA distributes the financial aid to states and individuals.

[Alexi Horowitz]

Okay. So this could potentially put these disaster relief funds in the president's control. Like, didn't we already have a confrontation this year over the LA wildfires?

[Waylon Wong]

We did. Trump had threatened to withhold federal disaster money because he was unhappy with how California was managing water, among other grievances. So that raised fears that the president could use disaster relief to punish states or governors that, you know, run afoul of him.

[Darian Woods]

It seems like FEMA's been on the chopping block for most of this year. It already saw a bunch of staffing cuts.

[Waylon Wong]

Yeah. CNN has reported that FEMA is projected to lose close to 30% of its workforce by the end of the year. Now FEMA falls under the Department of Homeland Security. And Kristi Noem, who heads up Homeland Security, has talked about eliminating FEMA outright. She's walked back that language. But she and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth are co chairing a council that's doing a review of fema. They're going to suggest changes. And based on the way she and the president have been talking, it does seem like the changes could be drastic.

[Darian Woods]

And speaking of breakups and tough news, Alexi, what's happening in the world of entertainment?

[Alexi Horowitz]

Okay, so from the drastic breakup department, my indicator this week is the number two. That's the number of companies that'll be created when the entertainment juggernaut Warner Brothers Discovery is split in half as early as next year. Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav announced earlier this week that one of these new companies will be dedicated to its cable and television services like cnn. And the other company's gonna focus on its streaming offerings like HBO and also its studio businesses.

[Waylon Wong]

Real talk, I cannot keep any of this stuff straight. Didn't Warner Brothers Discovery just merge a couple years ago?

[Alexi Horowitz]

Yeah, that's right. Listeners may remember Warner Brothers Discovery was created just three years ago through this big merger between WarnerMedia and Discovery. And the company, as part of that, took on around $50 billion in debt to finance the move. And the idea at the time was that legacy media companies needed to get as big as possible to compete with streamers like Netflix. And the company CEO, David Zaslav, he came in with this big plan to combine all of the kind of reality TV offerings of the Discovery Network with all the prestige programming of HBO and put it all on one platform basically to lure People in with like, the white lotuses of the world and then lock them down with, you know, 90 day fiance or whatever.

[Darian Woods]

This is making the days of the controversy over HBO Max turning into Max seem like salad days.

[Waylon Wong]

No, I'm still mad about that.

[Alexi Horowitz]

Yes. But as it happened, that kind of bigger is better bundling strategy didn't really pan out. Most of Max's viewers still seem to be signing on for HBO's prestige offering and not the wide array of reality TV shows. And the cable and TV parts of the business, which includes things like CNN. They still bring in money, though. Cable TV as a whole is widely seen to be in decline. So as the company's stock price dropped over the last few months, David Zaslav and the company's leadership decided it was time to do this sort of corporate U turn and split the company up. They even announced last month that their streaming platform would be renamed yet again, going back to HBO Max.

[Waylon Wong]

I am going to flip over a table in here, but okay, what about that $50 billion? They just have to what? Eat it?

[Alexi Horowitz]

Well, the debt currently stands around $37 billion, and the company said that most of that will go to the cable and TV outfit after the split.

[Darian Woods]

Well, thank you, Alexei. You are the best guest from Planet Money we've had all week.

[Alexi Horowitz]

Wow. Thank you.

[Darian Woods]

In a competition of women, I will take it. Sorry to admit it, but the best. And you're also the worst. I gotta admit. You know, the best and the worst.

[Alexi Horowitz]

I contain multitudes. Thanks for having me, guys.

[Waylon Wong]

You've taken us to the Max and back.

[NPR Host]

Hey.

[Darian Woods]

This episode was produced by Angel Carreras with engineering by Kwesi Lee. It was fact checked by Cyril Juarez. Cait Concannon edits the show and the indicator is a production of npr.

[NPR Host]

Support for this podcast and the following message come from Fisher Investments SVP Judy Abrams shares the experience she hopes to create when meeting a prospective client for the first time.

[Judy Abrams]

One of the ways that I work to establish trust is to listen. We're going to be asking you questions to make sure we truly can understand what's going on with you. Then we can make decisions not only for the present moment, but also for whatever direction you're going into.

[NPR Host]

Learn [e-mail] Investing in securities involves the risk of loss. This message comes from Thrive Market. The food industry is a multi billion dollar industry. But not everything on the shelf is made with your health in mind. At Thrive Market, they go beyond the standards, curating the highest quality products for you and your family. While focusing on organic first and restricting more than 1,000 harmful ingredients, all shipped at your door. Shop at a grocery store that actually cares for your [e-mail] podcast for 30% off your first order plus a $60 free gift. This message comes from Warby Parker. What makes a great pair of glasses at Warby Parker? It's all the invisible extras without the extra cost, like free adjustments for life. Find your [e-mail] or visit one of their hundreds of stores around the country.