Why is AI burying my CV?

Summary

---

Podcast Summary: The Interface (BBC)

Episode Title: Why is AI Burying My CV?
Release Date: June 11, 2026
Hosts: Thomas Germain, Karen Hao, Nicky Woolf

---

Episode Overview

This episode of The Interface dives into the ways artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming the hiring process—often to the detriment of job seekers, especially new graduates. The hosts discuss how AI-powered resume screening, automated interviews, and algorithmic candidate evaluation are not only making job hunting more impersonal, but also risk increasing bias and shutting out qualified candidates. The episode also touches on related tech culture topics, including new trends in messaging apps and a reality show featuring Silicon Valley CEOs.

---

1. AI and the Job Search: The Rise of Automated Hiring

[02:34–16:09]

The Flood of AI in Hiring

• Karen opens with startling facts about today’s job market, highlighting not only fewer opportunities due to AI advancements, but also the explosion in job applications—now three times higher per opening than in 2022 ([03:45]).
  • "Apparently. Now, according to a hiring platform called Greenhouse, there are three times as many applications going into every single job opening today as compared to 2022." – Karen Hao [03:40]
• The double impact:
  1. AI is eliminating jobs.
  2. Applicants are also using AI to blanket-apply to many jobs, further overwhelming the system.

Karen’s AI Interview Experience

• Karen describes going through a simulated job interview conducted entirely by an AI at the company “Merkur” as part of her reporting ([04:43]).
  • The AI interviewer is a "glowing orb with a disembodied voice" that responds with generic, context-insensitive statements—a surreal, impersonal experience.
  • "It really does feel like this job really helps you improve your English. Yeah, right." – Karen Hao [06:31]
• The AI even struggled with language context, switching languages mid-interview without processing, highlighting the technology’s immaturity ([06:02–07:32]).

How Widespread Is This?

• A recent Greenhouse survey: 63% of 3,000 job seekers said they had been interviewed by AI ([07:53]).
  • 38% of candidates said they walked away after realizing the interview was AI-based, with another 12% saying they would do the same ([08:52]).

The Consequences of AI Resume Screening

• Major study (Stanford, Chapman & Northeastern) looked at millions of applications via Pymetrics, a screening vendor ([09:00–11:53]):
  • Pymetrics asks applicants to play behavioral games, like a risk-assessment "balloon" game, and uses the results to make recommendations.
  • AI introduces bias: Black and Asian candidates were recommended at lower rates; if equalized, 40,000 more applications would have advanced ([11:25]).
    • "If they had been recommended at the same rate to jobs as the preferred or the favored group ... 40,000 more applications would have actually gotten to the next step in the hiring process." – Karen Hao [11:25]
  • Algorithmic Blackballing: If many employers use the same system, one bad result may block you everywhere—25 applications needed per callback, versus 10 under traditional systems ([11:57–12:31]).
    • "If all of those jobs are using the same system ... you would have to apply for 25 applications to get one callback." – Karen Hao [11:57]

Emotional & Practical Toll

• Nikki calls it a "soul destroying process for people just coming out of college." ([12:39])
• Tom observes the problem is now one “single source of truth”—a flawed AI game can lock candidates out system-wide ([12:52]).

The Recruiter’s Perspective & The “Resume Arms Race”

• Recruiters are flooded by AI-generated resumes and desperate for filtering systems ([13:13]).
• 90% of U.S. employers now use some form of AI screening ([14:28]).
• Job seekers try to “hack” AI screeners (e.g., hiding keywords in white text): sometimes it works, sometimes it backfires ([13:43–15:23]).
  • "For some jobs, this absolutely backfires ... screening tools themselves are now starting to build in features to look for these kinds of tricks and discard the resume." – Karen Hao [15:14]
• The system is in a perpetual "arms race" between tricking and catching tricked resumes.

Memorable Moment:

• Tom jokes about aspiring to "the orb's job"—being a faceless AI interviewer ([15:42]).

---

2. Slow Messaging: The Culture of Instant vs. Delayed Communication

[18:18–30:34]

Roost Social: Messages as Carrier Pigeons

• Tom introduces Roost Social, a messaging app that delays messages according to the “travel time” of different birds ([18:18–19:40]).
  • "It's a messaging app ... but it sends messages at the speed it would take them to arrive if you were using a carrier pigeon." – Thomas Germain [18:23]
• The whimsical system leads to slow, deliberate communication and server overload due to popularity.

The Cultural Shift: Always-On vs. Intentional Messaging

• Instant messaging creates social pressure and anxiety over quick responses ([21:26–22:02]).
• Longer delays prompt more thoughtful, in-depth communication—much like letter writing of the past.
  • Karen shares that with friends who take weeks/months to reply, messages are more meaningful ([23:04]).
  • "My messages and their messages are actually way longer and way more thoughtful. And we often send voice notes ... 15 to 20 minutes." – Karen Hao [23:17]

Neurodiversity and “Message Anxiety”

• Tom notes fast messaging can be alienating for people with ADHD/dyslexia ([25:09]), and the "bad texter" phenomenon is a widely-felt cultural pressure.
  • "There was a really great article in the Guardian ... where this person said, I have an evil in my heart that makes me terrible at texting back." – Thomas Germain [25:03]

Messaging as Modern Social Media

• Nikki considers group chats her “social media”—some having hundreds of participants, serving as private news platforms ([27:32–27:48]).
• Tom and Karen reflect on how much of daily social interaction now happens via text, not speech ([26:40–26:52]).
  • "Depending on the day, there are definitely days where ... there are more minutes that I spend sending and reading text messages than having actual conversations with people." – Thomas Germain [26:52]

Apps Reinforce the Cycle

• Discussed how apps use features like “read receipts” to keep users engaged (and sometimes anxious) ([28:30–29:54]).
  • Tom debates whether to leave them on as a gesture of openness, or off as self-preservation.

---

3. Tech Titans Make Reality TV: ‘Mafia the Game’

[30:46–41:14]

The Premise

• Nikki and Karen watched "Mafia the Game," a YouTube reality show produced by Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund, where top Silicon Valley executives (Sam Altman, Palmer Luckey, Brian Johnson, Moxie Marlinspike, and others) play a deception-based party game ([30:55–32:53]).
  • "They’re all in these kind of leather bound chairs ... Sam Altman, Palmer Luckey, and other founders." – Nikki Wolfe [32:30]

Audience Reaction: Humanizing or Manipulative?

• Both Karen and Nikki confess to finding the show unexpectedly entertaining and insightful, seeing company founders' personalities play out in an unscripted, playful setting.
  • "It's interesting to watch. And I could feel myself falling for exactly what they're trying to do, which is sort of humanize themselves, put them in this kind of social environment." – Nikki Wolfe [33:13]
• Karen valued the glimpse into key figures’ “real” personalities and the insight into deception reading, citing Altman’s uncanny accuracy ([34:02]).
  • "Sam Altman immediately nailed who was the mafia as a townsperson ... he's really, really good at reading people." – Karen Hao [34:41]

Criticism: Is This Just PR?

• Tom finds it distasteful, calling it a "cutesy experience" intended to defang criticism of tech titans ([35:20–35:53]).
  • "I find the whole thing a little bit distasteful. ... I'm not really looking for a cutesy experience with these folks." – Thomas Germain [35:53]
• The hosts agree that tech elites’ move into podcasting, entertainment, and now reality TV signals an effort to control the narrative, bypass traditional media, and rehabilitate their public image ([38:19–40:17]).
  • "I think they are actually trying to target the public ... to continue massaging the narrative." – Karen Hao [39:27]

Storytelling as Power

• Founders increasingly view “storytelling” as an essential CEO skill set, not just for investors but for swaying public opinion ([40:44]).
  • "The most important skill that they need as a founder is storytelling." – Karen Hao [40:54]

---

Notable Quotes & Moments

| Timestamp | Quote | Speaker | |-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------| | 03:40 | "There are three times as many applications going into every single job opening today as compared to 2022." | Karen Hao | | 06:31 | "It really does feel like this job really helps you improve your English. Yeah, right." | Karen Hao | | 11:25 | "If they had been recommended at the same rate as the preferred group ... 40,000 more would have advanced." | Karen Hao | | 12:39 | "This is like a soul destroying process for people just coming out of college." | Nikki Wolfe | | 15:14 | "Screening tools themselves are now starting to build in features to look for these kinds of tricks." | Karen Hao | | 18:23 | "But it sends messages at the speed it would take them to arrive if you were using a carrier pigeon." | Thomas Germain | | 23:17 | "My messages and their messages are actually way longer and way more thoughtful." | Karen Hao | | 25:03 | "I have an evil in my heart that makes me terrible at texting back." | Thomas Germain | | 32:30 | "They’re all in these kind of leather bound chairs... Sam Altman, Palmer Luckey, and other founders." | Nikki Wolfe | | 34:41 | "Sam Altman immediately nailed who was the mafia... he's really, really good at reading people." | Karen Hao | | 35:53 | "I'm not really looking for a cutesy experience with these folks." | Thomas Germain | | 39:27 | "I think they are actually trying to target the public... continue massaging the narrative." | Karen Hao | | 40:54 | "The most important skill that they need as a founder is storytelling." | Karen Hao |

---

Key Takeaways

• AI hiring tech is making job seeking harder and more impersonal: Automated interviews and resume screens can reinforce bias, blackball candidates with a single poor performance, and have become a psychological obstacle, especially for new graduates.
• Arms race between candidates and AI: Job seekers attempt to “hack” AI screeners, but recruiters and systems now actively look for such tactics.
• Instant messaging is both enabling and burdening: Apps like Roost Social explore slower, more intentional communication as a remedy to the pressure and superficiality of fast texting.
• Tech elite’s PR play: Silicon Valley leaders are entering the media arena, using entertainment and storytelling to humanize themselves and regain narrative control—but not everyone is buying it.

---

Timestamps by Topic

• AI Job Market & Application Overload – [02:34–04:20]
• Karen’s AI Job Interview – [04:20–07:32]
• Prevalence and Problems with AI Interviews – [07:33–13:13]
• Resume Scanning, Hacking, and Recruiter Side – [13:14–16:09]
• Slow Messaging & Roost Social – [18:18–24:13]
• Messaging Culture & Anxiety – [24:13–30:34]
• Mafia the Game & Tech PR – [30:46–41:14]

---

This episode expertly unpacks the friction and absurdities introduced by AI in modern hiring, explores alternatives to our always-on digital lives, and offers a timely critique of tech moguls seeking to control the public conversation.

Transcript

[Thomas Germain]

This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the uk.

[Inner Balance Ad Voice]

If you're feeling off fatigue, mood changes, skin shifts, yet your labs say everything's normal, you're not alone. Meet Oestra from Inner Balance. The first all in one prescription strength bioidentical hormone cream that's natural and effective and only takes one drop 10 seconds a day. Oester replaces five to six products women typically use to treat symptoms and is third party tested to ensure the highest quality. Visit innerbalance.com today to start feeling like yourself again.

[Chelsea Handler]

That's innerbalance.com this is Chelsea Handler from Dear Chelsea. This podcast is sponsored by Verasity. Welcome to an all natural way to slim down, get energized and sharpen your focus. Verasity is revolutionizing health by tackling the root cause of so many issues. With Verasity's drug free, clinically proven and doctor formulated solutions, you can support your body's needs to live your healthiest life. If your goal is weight loss, try Metabolism ignite. The number one doctor recommended GLP1 booster and GLP1 alternative. Metabolism Ignite has sold out 10 times for a reason. No side effects, no allergens. Metabolism Ignite is a natural, safe plant based aid that results in an 85% reduction in hunger and is clinically proven to lose on average nine pounds in 90 days. And metabolism Ignite is safe for everyone including breastfeeding new moms and women in perimenopause. So before Metabolism Ignite sells out again, make the switch to GLP1s the natural way. Head to VeracityHealth Co and use code iHeart for up to 65% off your order. Once again, that's V E R A C I T Y Health Co for up to 65% off. And make sure you use my promo code iheartra.

[Karen Howe]

So 63% had at one point been interviewed by AI during their job seeking process. Yes.

[Thomas Germain]

Whoa.

[Nikki Wolfe]

Welcome to the Interface, the show that decodes how tech is rewiring your week and your world. I'm Nikki Wolfe.

[Karen Howe]

I'm Karen Howe.

[Thomas Germain]

And I'm Thomas Germain.

[Karen Howe]

Today on the Interface, will your resume forever be stuck stuck in AI limbo?

[Thomas Germain]

Is slow messaging better than incident messaging?

[Nikki Wolfe]

And why On Earth attack CEOs making their own game show?

[Karen Howe]

So Nicky and Tom, we just had a bunch of graduations from universities and now there are all these new graduates on the job market hunting for an opportunity. We have talked before, and many people have talked before about the impact that AI is having on the job market and the fact that it's actually shrinking the number of opportunities that are available. But I wanted to talk with both of you today about yet another problem, which is how AI is affecting the ability of new graduates to even get the jobs that are available. And of course, I'm talking about the application of AI in the hiring process. So I first want to start with a crazy stat, because I think generally we, you know, a lot of people realize that there is AI involved in the hiring process, but this is just a crazy stat, apparently. Now, according to a hiring platform called Greenhouse, there are three times as many applications going into every single job opening today as compared to 2022.

[Thomas Germain]

Three times.

[Karen Howe]

Three times. So they think it's because of the double effect of AI shrinking the number

[Michelle Andrews]

of jobs that are available.

[Karen Howe]

And also then all of these graduates are using AI, or job applicants in general, are using AI to apply to as many jobs as possible. And because they're not necessarily getting as many hits, also due to AI, they're increasing the number of job postings that they're casting their resume out to. So the whole effect is really deeply intertwined with the impact that AI is having.

[Nikki Wolfe]

Like an employment death spiral kind of thing.

[Karen Howe]

Exactly. So I started thinking about this recently because I had my own really weird experience going, simulating, going through the AI hiring process. And I was interviewed not by a human, but by an AI model.

[Nikki Wolfe]

Well, you actually. You went through an AI job interview.

[Karen Howe]

I did, because I was working on that investigation that I have talked with you both about a couple episodes ago for more Perfect Union, where I was looking at the data annotation industry or the human labor behind the AI industry. And I was looking at this specific company called Merkur, which uses AI as part of its hiring process very, very heavily. And by pure coincidence, while I was doing this investigation, I get a recruiting email from Mercur trying to recruit me to work on their platform. I kid you not. Like, I've literally never gotten an email before this investigation and never gotten an email after, but literally, because it, like,

[Thomas Germain]

says the word AI on your LinkedIn or what?

[Karen Howe]

Probably because I was looking at a lot of record job postings on LinkedIn.

[Thomas Germain]

Right, right.

[Karen Howe]

Yeah, Well, I. I mean, to be honest, I have no idea, but that is my best guess. And so I click on the start button and this, like, little music plays and this bubble appears on my screen and it's just this, like, glowing orb that is of a disembodied AI voice beginning to interview me.

[Nikki Wolfe]

The orb decides, yeah, and it was

[Karen Howe]

just the weirdest experience ever, because first of all, when I was speaking English because this is a bilingual interview. You could tell that the large language model that was interviewing me really didn't actually process what I was saying. Like, at one point it's like, oh, tell us how good are you at English? And I was like, well, I'm an investigative journalist and I write in English, so I'm pretty good at English. And like, the LLM just automatically echoes back exactly what you say. So it's like, wow, it's so amazing that you're an investigative journalist. It really does feel like this job really helps you improve your English. Yeah, yeah, right. And then it switched to interviewing me in Chinese, but it spoke English. And it was like, you continue to speak now in Chinese. And I was like, okay, let's see if it actually understands what's going on, like, what I'm saying. At one point it was like, can you say in your language, your second language? Something about an amazing dish that is important to your culture? And so I say in Chinese, I'm like, well, I'm American and we eat a lot of McDonald's, so hamburgers are really important to American culture. And the LLM is like, oh, tell me more about this amazing culinary specialty from your culture. So I mean, it's funny because, like, for me, I'm not actually going through the experience for real.

[Thomas Germain]

Right.

[Karen Howe]

But I was curious afterwards, like, how many people are actually experiencing the AI interview?

[Thomas Germain]

And wait, did you get the job?

[Nikki Wolfe]

Yeah, yeah. Did they get back in touch? Did you, Were they like, tell us more about this, about this.

[Thomas Germain]

I guess your English isn't that good after all. Yeah, yeah, you talk a big game.

[Karen Howe]

But, but anyway, so I, I, I was looking up a stat around how many people have actually experienced this. So there was a survey once again by Greenhouse that came out just last month where they, they surveyed nearly 3,000 active job seekers, nearly 2/3 of them, so 63% had at one point been interviewed by AI during their job seeking process.

[Nikki Wolfe]

And that's not even counting people who also in the job process, their resumes might have been processed by AI. Or like, that's just this, just the orb. I actually think it might be more unsettling if it was an AI generated human avatar. Right.

[Karen Howe]

Which, who know, like, maybe that is awesome.

[Thomas Germain]

I've seen videos of that on social media. You never know like the person, like, faking it, but like, people are posting these recordings of them being interviewed by like a guy that looks like he was rendered on a PlayStation 2.

[Karen Howe]

Yeah. The same survey mentioned that 38% of candidates walked away from the interview when they realized that AI was involved, and 12% said that they would if they ever encountered a situation like this. There's a much more prominent role that AI plays in AI hiring, which is the resume candidate screening part of the process. And this was the subject of a recent study that was done by researchers from Stanford Chapman and Northeastern, where they did the largest empirical study of algorithmic hiring to see how these screening tools are actually affecting people's ability to access that economic opportunity in the first place. And they had a really unique situation where they got actually cooperation from one of the largest screening vendors called Pymetrics to give them a bunch of data on 3.4 million people that had applied to 4 million jobs across 150 employers. So this is like a really rich data set. It's an actual real life data set. And the way that Pymetrics works is people will play a series of games and then the AI model will assess and then recommend or not recommend the person for a particular job opening.

[Thomas Germain]

And wait, when you say they play games, like what, what kind of games?

[Karen Howe]

So there's this one where you're given a balloon and you have to pump the balloo balloon to earn money. And for every pump you get 5 cents. But if you pop the balloon by pumping it too much, you lose all of your money. And so what, it's. Yeah, it's like these, supposedly it's all of these. There's 12 core games that are meant to assess different types of skills. I imagine the balloon game is meant to assess risk tolerance and strategy. And so interesting and also kind of disturbing about the Stanford study is they found two things. One, that there is a lot of racial discrimination. They had this stat that said that black and Asian candidates, if they had been recommended at the same rate to jobs as the preferred or the favored group, which was usually the white candidates, but not always, then 40,000 more applications would have actually gotten to the next step in the hiring process. So there is an inequitable rate of recommendation depending on your race. So that was finding number one. Finding number two, which I think is the, the even more interesting one is that the researchers found that essentially there is a higher rate of a candidate getting algorithmically blackballed by a system and getting none of the jobs that they apply for if all of those jobs are using the same system.

[Nikki Wolfe]

So you mess up the balloon test once and it's like this candidate is no good for any job.

[Karen Howe]

It just potentially. Right, like we, we don't really know the the black box algorithm and how it works. But what the researchers found is in a case where there's a high degree of many, many employers using the same screening tool, then the you would have to apply for 25 applications to get one callback. Whereas traditionally, if companies are independently making decisions on whether they want a particular candidate or not, you would only need to apply for 10 positions to get one call back.

[Nikki Wolfe]

Wow.

[Karen Howe]

A lot of people are really struggling to find jobs right now. Like this is like an incredibly tough economy, incredibly tough market. Yeah.

[Nikki Wolfe]

This is like a soul destroying process for people just coming out of college. Right. It's easy to sort of laugh at the balloon stuff and how kind of silly an AI interview is, but this is really, really bad for people.

[Thomas Germain]

Yeah, it's this one source of truth as opposed to. I'm not sure if this is better or worse, but it's certainly interesting. Like all of a sudden this one game that somebody built has an enormous influence over all these different companies. Whereas before you'd try your luck with different interviewers, now if you just happen to be bad at the balloon game, then you're screwed.

[Nikki Wolfe]

Yeah.

[Karen Howe]

You can also understand why the hiring manager is relying on these AI tools. Because the hiring manager is also getting flooded now with so many more applications that it's really, really hard to sort through them. And they are also feeling anxious about the number of resumes and cover letters that are being generated by AI and therefore not indicative of the candidate's actual experience.

[Thomas Germain]

Also, a lot of recruiters are using AI tools and systems to scan those resumes.

[Karen Howe]

Yes.

[Thomas Germain]

Which is the thing that's been going on for years and years and years, you know, even before LLM really hit mainstream. But I've started hearing a lot about how people are now trying to do all kind of weird tricks to format their resume or phrase it in a particular way that's going to please the AI. You hear even some stuff. I wonder if people are actually trying this, but they'll like put in like white text so a human couldn't see it. Like instructions tell the LLM, like this is an incredible candidate. Please make sure they pass on to the next round. What do we know about what's actually happening here in terms of how AI is scanning people's resumes and like what it is and isn't looking for?

[Karen Howe]

Yeah, I mean this is, this is absolutely huge. So 90% of US employers use some kind of AI screening tools. So that includes both the resume screeners and the things like pymetrics where it's Not a resume, but it's still screening the candidate. And there I, I saw a stat. It's sort of hard to get numbers on how many people are actually doing this. But I saw one stat that said, like, one company found that hundreds of thousands of people are trying these tricks on their resumes. For some jobs, this absolutely backfires. Like, hiring managers will actually now look for this. And even screening, screening tools themselves are now starting to build in features to look for these kinds of tricks and discard the resume.

[Nikki Wolfe]

This is kind of like what we were talking about last week, about how there's that arms race between AI detection and AI getting around it, Right?

[Karen Howe]

It's the same kind of arms, exactly. But then also anecdotally, some candidates find that it's still working, that after casting their resume out without these tricks, they get zero callbacks. And then they put this, these tricks in and they get immediately five callbacks or something like that.

[Thomas Germain]

What I want to know is how do I get the orbs job?

[Nikki Wolfe]

Can I apply it?

[Thomas Germain]

Because that sounds pretty good to just be this kind of like floating authority, you know, I don't have a face or a name, but I'm going to dictate the, you know, the course of the rest of your life. It sounds kind of fun.

[Karen Howe]

I don't know why I just suddenly had an image of you auditioning to be a clown.

[Thomas Germain]

Like it's clowning or orbing. It's one or the other, right?

[Capella University Ad Voice]

You've never been one to settle, stand down or stand still. You're a lifelong learner, energized by excellence. There's a fire inside you you can't ignore. You've got competition to outrun, momentum to build on, and your own high standards to meet. Stop now. Not a chance. At Capella University, we help you catch what you're chasing because you've always had the drive. Now go earn the degree. Capella University. What can't you do? Visit capella.edu to learn more.

[Inner Balance Ad Voice]

If you're feeling off fatigue, mood changes, skin shifts, yet your labs say everything's normal, you're not alone. Meet Oestra from Inner Balance. The first all in one prescription strength bioidentical hormone cream that's natural and effective and only takes one drop, 10 seconds a day. Oester replaces five to six products women typically use to treat symptoms and is third party tested to ensure the highest quality. Visit innerbalance.com today to start feeling like yourself again.

[Verasity Ad Voice]

That's innerbalance.com this podcast is sponsored by Verasity. Everybody I know is talking about GLP1s and you all know I prefer natural options in my lifestyle. Always welcome to an all natural way to slim down, get energized and sharpen your focus. Verasity is revolutionizing health by tackling the root cause of so many issues, metabolism. With Verasity's drug free, clinically proven and doctor formulated solutions, you can support your body's needs to live your healthiest life. Veracity founder and CEO Allie Egan is a certified hormonal health coach. Her personal experience with metabolic issues inspired her to develop holistic solutions for achieving optimal health. Make the switch to GLP1's the Natural Way. Head to VeracityHealth Co and use code iHeart for up to 65% off your order. Once again, that's V E R A C I T Y Health Co for up to 65% off. And make sure you use the promo code iHeart so they know we sent you.

[Thomas Germain]

All right, so you guys already know what my story is this week. Over the past 10 days or so, I have gotten completely obsessed with this new app. It's called Roost Social. And the idea of Roost Social is it's a messaging app, right, like WhatsApp or whatever. But the difference is, is it sends messages at the speed it would take them to arrive if you were using a carrier pigeon, which is a major change of pace in both a literal and a figurative sense.

[Nikki Wolfe]

Right? Yeah. We've been sending each other some birds. It's been a while since I've found a new.

[Karen Howe]

Since you've used a carrier pigeon.

[Nikki Wolfe]

It's been a while since I've used

[Thomas Germain]

a carrier pigeon is quite old.

[Nikki Wolfe]

And actually I still haven't used a carrier pigeon because. Tom, I sent. I sent you a penguin.

[Thomas Germain]

You sent me a penguin? Yeah. So what the way this app works is you start out, you make your account and then you can pick a number of birds and they all move at different speeds, you know, like birds do. And you give the app your location and then you find your friend, you send them a message. I sent Karen. I picked like a really fast bird. I think the fastest one I could find goes like 80km an hour or something like that. I sent it, I think three or four days ago. Yeah, it still has about, I think three days left of travel before it reaches Karen in Hong Kong.

[Karen Howe]

Yes, it's fine. It's around five days because I also picked a really fast bird to send to Nikki and it was a turkey. I didn't realize turkeys can be that fast.

[Nikki Wolfe]

Apparently really fast. So Ostriches.

[Thomas Germain]

Ostriches do like, the duck was really fast, too.

[Nikki Wolfe]

It's got a really, really wide selection of things you can send. So I. I've sent Karen a snail, which will arrive where you are in Hong Kong in exactly 72 weeks from now.

[Thomas Germain]

72 weeks? Yeah. I sent Nikki this, like, kind of sincere message. Like, nikki, I'm so excited to continue making the world's greatest podcast with you. And then, I don't know, like, he sent me a message at the same time. His comes a day later. And I think what he said was,

[Nikki Wolfe]

yeah, because it was a penguin.

[Thomas Germain]

He said a penguin. It said, do, do, do, do, do. That was his response. So any of these birds back and forth got me thinking about how instant messaging, if we want to call it that, right? Whether it's texting or DMS or whatever it is, how that's affecting, you know, not just our social relationships, but also, like, the way that we're thinking about ourselves. We just, like, bought into this world, and I don't think that we've really taken the time to stop and think about what this is doing. So this is, you know, obviously kind of ridiculous, but it does. Something about this does seem to be very appealing. I got a notification over the weekend that the app had crashed because too many people were using it. Now, that doesn't mean millions or anything. You know, whatever they had their server set up to handle, it was more than that. And I think, you know, aside from the fun of it, there is. It's a very different way of thinking about communicating. This is something I've been, you know, kind of mulling over.

[Nikki Wolfe]

It's kind of the opposite of how instant messaging makes you feel in your brain. So I don't know about you guys, right? When. When you send an instant message, immediately I'm starting to think about, oh, have they received it? Like, if I don't get an instant response, is someone ignoring me? The psychological effect of instant messaging has kind of crept up on us. Cause we're. You know, this goes back to the days of, I don't know whether you guys were on MSN messenger or aol, like, those kind of things back then. It became such a core part, that speed of communication became such a core part of how we operate in the world. We can get an instant message to anyone anywhere on the planet.

[Thomas Germain]

It creates this weird social pressure, right? This has been talked about ad nauseam, but, like, you always have to be on. You always have to be available.

[Nikki Wolfe]

Do you feel like it starts to devalue that communication compared to, I mean, letter writing is the kind of thing that that kind of always goes back to. But like, you know, in the war, people would send love letters and they were thoughtful and meaningful. And now you just kind of fire off these messages and they come back and, you know, get left on red or that kind of thing. It just feels less romantic.

[Thomas Germain]

There is definitely, like, there's less intentionality.

[Nikki Wolfe]

Right.

[Thomas Germain]

I sent you this message, Karen. Someday you'll receive it. It's like, more thoughtful than a text message that I would have sent you. I know that it's going to take a while for you to get it, so it's also like, longer. Right. If I sent you a message on WhatsApp, it would be like seven or eight words or something, but because I know it's going to take forever. There's like this. I just had this, like, impetus to say more, which is kind of interesting.

[Karen Howe]

I have a couple friends that just completely subvert instant messaging culture. Whenever I send them a text, it can take a week or months for them to get back to me.

[Thomas Germain]

Months.

[Karen Howe]

One of them has taken months before to get back. But because of this, my. My messages and their messages are actually way longer and way more thoughtful. And we often send voice notes to each other, so we'll send like 15 to 20 minute voice notes and just wait for the other person to get back one day. And originally when this first happened, because I used to be, like, very much, you know, someone sends me a message, I immediately respond. And I would get really peeved about how long it would take. But then I realized, this is so nice. Like, why are we so beholden to the design of instant messaging? Why don't we just return to the rhythms that we prefer to communicate to people? And so I think my friends are pretty radical and they've radicalized me and I've started taking a lot longer to respond to people.

[Nikki Wolfe]

Yeah, I will say voice notes. Sending me a long voice note is a good way of having it just like, parked in my inbox for, like, a really long time.

[Thomas Germain]

Yeah, it is funny. Like, people have different feelings about the voice notes too. Like, I have some friends who are obsessed with voice notes. I kind of like that it depends on who I'm talking to when I'm sending a voice note. And maybe this just, like, gives you a window into my own personal psychosis. Feel like, oh, like, I have to say things very well and, like, elucidate. And all of a sudden I feel like I'm performing or something. And then you have to be more brief because otherwise you're like sending this person like a whole podcast that they have to listen to. Right. If it's going on and on and it's just a different. It taps into a different part of your brain. Right. You're speaking instead of typing, so it like flows a little bit more. There's like a rhythm that's baked into the medium. Right?

[Nikki Wolfe]

Yeah, yeah. It's not okay to get like a 20 minute voice note and respond with LOL, I guess.

[Thomas Germain]

No. Yeah, right. I mean, in the same way, if I sent you a very brief message and it took you weeks to respond, I might think that that was kind of rude. Right. Or even if it took days, you'd be like, oh, well, I guess I'm not very important to you. But this whole idea of like message anxiety, if we want to call it, it's like a real thing. Like it does have negative effects on people. And you know, like, for example, if you're someone who has ADHD or dyslexia, you know, this system that we've all built for ourselves or at least kind of like blindly wandered into can be more difficult and it does cause real problems for people. Right. Like, not everyone is a person who wants to write back immediately, but you kind of have to unless you're okay with the, the negative or awkward or strange message you might be sending to people. But then there's all this, this whole discussion about, oh, there's no such thing as bad texters. There's only people who don't care. There was a, there was a really great article in the Guardian a while back about this problem of being a bad texter. And they quoted this like TikTok video where this person said, I have an evil in my heart that makes me terrible at texting back. Right. It is like such a fundamental part of human relationships.

[Nikki Wolfe]

Is it too far to say that this is the texting? Text messages and text based apps are humanity's primary means of communication now is

[Thomas Germain]

that if we're talking of number of individual back and forth interactions, probably like, I think I text more people. Certainly I text more people in a day than I speak to face to face.

[Nikki Wolfe]

Yeah.

[Thomas Germain]

Depending on the day. There are definitely days where like there are more minutes that I spend sending and reading text messages than having actual conversations with people. That's so dark. I've never thought about that before.

[Nikki Wolfe]

How many texts do you guys think you send in a day?

[Karen Howe]

I think it really depends on the day.

[Nikki Wolfe]

I'm easily in the hundreds and reading Hundreds.

[Karen Howe]

Where you're sending.

[Nikki Wolfe]

Sending hundreds, reading, probably thousands. You know, I'm scanning through a group chat with a hundred messages in one go.

[Karen Howe]

Wow. I think I've sent like 20 text messages.

[Thomas Germain]

Hundreds on the typical day is a lot.

[Karen Howe]

Hundreds is a lot.

[Thomas Germain]

Yeah.

[Karen Howe]

How much time are you spending talking to?

[Thomas Germain]

Right, yeah. Everyone I know he's not texting us, Karen. I'm kind of taking this personally.

[Nikki Wolfe]

In some ways, group chats are kind of my social media. They're like little private Twitter. Some of them have several hundred people in it. I get a lot of news from those. They. They flow all the time. It's. It's not the kind of thing where you feel like you have to respond to everything. You sort of get into and out and out of it. Like a social media.

[Thomas Germain]

There has been a lot of talk about that recently that like imessage, like Apple's texting system, is one of the primary places that people hang out. And I think a lot of time was spent on social media. Like, if we think about what social media is like the old days of like Facebook or early Instagram, where it really was about interacting with like your friends, I think a lot of that had shifted from social media to text messaging as it's become easier to, you know, share pictures and videos and links and there's like features built in and you could talk. I think a lot of that social energy is now taking place in the texts.

[Karen Howe]

And.

[Thomas Germain]

And I think in a very real sense, like imessage and Instagram are direct competitors. Yeah, right. Like if you look at the layout of the Instagram app, it changes all the time. For a while, like right in the middle where your thumb would go would be a button to take you to Instagram shopping, which doesn't even exist anymore. For a while it was like post. They really wanted people to make more Instagram content. Now it's the message button. It's like to take you to the DMs because like in the concept of what Instagram is for, in the mind of the people who run Instagram, I think they want it to be a place where you are in a. A lot of the time messaging and interacting with people. It's part of what makes Instagram sticky. And one thing in particular that this made me think about is like among the social pressures of text messages is like you can turn on, you know, the read receipts where depending on the receipts, I hate them too. It like feels like an invasion of privacy that if a person, when you have them on, if you read the message, then they know, and then you. If you don't respond immediately, you saw it and you didn't write back. Right. So there's this, like, thing like, I don't care enough to respond, so I always go and turn them off because it's.

[Nikki Wolfe]

Yeah.

[Thomas Germain]

You know, it feels like an invasion of privacy. And I think it's like a pressure that's built in from the companies to get you to keep using the app. But now I'm wondering maybe. I think I might go turn it back on.

[Karen Howe]

I thought the conclusion would be the complete opposite.

[Thomas Germain]

Well, no, because. Because, like, why am I letting this app, you know, iMessage or WhatsApp or Instagram for that matter, like, dictate how I feel about the way that I'm interacting with people? Maybe it's fine to read a message and not respond immediately. And, like, they can know that I read it. And, like, that doesn't mean that I don't care about you or I don't love you.

[Nikki Wolfe]

I don't know. If you. If you ever. If you leave me on read, I am. I'm gonna be pissed about it.

[Thomas Germain]

I got. I got bad news. I'm leaving you on red all the time, Nikki. You just can't tell.

[Nikki Wolfe]

Yeah, but at least. At least it's not in my brain. I. No, I reject red receipts entirely.

[Thomas Germain]

Well, Karen, I think by next week you will receive the bird that I sent you. So I look forward to your response.

[Nikki Wolfe]

So, guys, I don't know what TV you guys have been watching recently to kick back.

[Karen Howe]

Same one as you, Nikki.

[Nikki Wolfe]

So I watched this show. I sat carrying on watching this show as well. Tom did not do his homework this week, so has not watched it. But you're coming in, coming into it. Kind of cold. Here's the premise. I don't know if you have heard of a game called Mafia. It's also if you've watched the Traitors, that's sort of what it's based on. And it's organized by a company called Founders Fund, which is at the heart of a lot of these Silicon Valley CEO networks.

[Karen Howe]

Peter Thiel's venture capital firm.

[Thomas Germain]

Yeah.

[Nikki Wolfe]

Now they have released a game show version of the game Mafia. It's called Mafia the game. It's on YouTube. If you've never played Mafia, it's some. You sort of sit in a circle. Some of you are allocated by random as Mafia, some as town people. There's various different variations. But essentially everyone closes their eyes. Someone will say, okay, now the Mafia open your eyes. You say, Point at someone you want to kill and then everyone close their eyes again. The townspeople have to work out who the mafia are. They mafia wins if they kill all the townspeople. Townspeople win if they successfully identify all of the mafia. That's at its basic level. And so in this game show version you have Sam Altman, who's The founder of OpenAI, Palmer Luckey, who co founded and Drew El, founders of other companies. And then one pro poker player who seems to know all of these.

[Thomas Germain]

And there's like Brian Johnson, or is it Brian Johnson?

[Nikki Wolfe]

Brian Johnston.

[Thomas Germain]

Yeah.

[Nikki Wolfe]

The founder of Don't Die, which is this life extending. Yeah.

[Thomas Germain]

He's the guy on social media who says you can live forever if, if you have a billion dollars and you get all these weird treatments. Yeah.

[Nikki Wolfe]

And then also Moxie Marlinspike, who's the founder of Signal, the encrypted messaging app. They're all in these kind of leather bound chairs. They deal the cards. There's a presenter who looks eerily like Ryan Reynolds. I don't know if you thought that Karen, the presenter guy just has Ryan Reynolds.

[Karen Howe]

I did not. But now that you say it.

[Thomas Germain]

So it's a bunch of billionaires and important people in the tech industry all getting together and the idea is that we might be entertained by watching them play a game.

[Karen Howe]

It's like a reality TV show.

[Thomas Germain]

Yeah.

[Nikki Wolfe]

You guys are not gonna like what I'm about to say, but I did actually quite enjoy it.

[Karen Howe]

Oh, I did too.

[Nikki Wolfe]

It's interesting to watch. And I could feel myself falling for exactly what they're trying to do, which is sort of humanize themselves, put them in this kind of social environment. You know, they've all got like a glass of wine in their hands, they're kind of hanging out.

[Thomas Germain]

And

[Nikki Wolfe]

it worked on me. You know, I found it an interesting experience to watch these people who so often you just see in, you know, congressional hearings or court cases or making press statements.

[Karen Howe]

Yeah. The reason I like the show is I feel like I was getting a lot of information about these individuals that would be helpful for my reporting.

[Thomas Germain]

Can you say more about that? Like what?

[Karen Howe]

Yeah, I mean, so the entire, the entire premise of Mafia is deception. That is the core of the game is that if you are mafia, you have to hide that you're mafia for the whole time. And the way that they set it up, they tell the viewer actually knows what role every single person is playing. So you know through the whole thing who is actually lying the whole time. And you can also see which people are the most perceptive that tells you something about their ability assess things. There was this one comment in particular that called out the fact that Sam Altman immediately nailed who was the mafia as a townsperson. This is what people say about him is that he is really, really good at reading people and also playing this all shucks kind of character when he's actually really spot on about how people behave. And so I found it really interesting from that perspective. And like they also, they're joking with one another the whole time. Like at one point someone says we should all listen to Brian because Brian can't die.

[Nikki Wolfe]

He's the buyer.

[Thomas Germain]

Yeah, yeah. I don't find rich and famous people inherently interesting. I'm not really curious to watch them sitting around in a room playing a stupid game like I could play. I think that these people are very interesting because the things that they do and say are important and have massive effects on our society.

[Karen Howe]

Exactly.

[Thomas Germain]

But I find the whole thing a little bit distasteful. Like why I. I'm not like a fan of any of these people. They're just businessmen, you know, like, why, why would I want to watch them? Especially, like, we spend so much of our time reporting on like the, the caustic effects of some of these businesses that these people run. I'm not really looking for like a cutesy experience with these folks. You know, they're all human beings, of course, 100%. But like, this is not my idea of entertainment. Right.

[Nikki Wolfe]

And there's clearly a part of it that is, you know, we know that we have a PR problem. Increasingly people are in all sorts of polls and across all sorts of things, making it clear that they do not like these, these tech, you know, CEOs for what they're doing in the world and for how they are kind of just from a personal image perspective. Which is why it was so interesting to me that on the one hand, there is this element of it that clearly worked on me that is the kind of humanizing element you're watching them in, you know, non professional kind of situation. But also picking a game where the entire premise is to lie is just so extraordinarily on the nose.

[Karen Howe]

I mean, so on the nose. The thing that I couldn't stop thinking about while I was watching it is why am I watching this? Not as in like, why do I feel compelled to watch this? But why are they producing? Exactly. Why are they producing this?

[Thomas Germain]

This guy, Mike Solana, who works at this venture capital firm, Founders Fund, this is his brainchild. And he said the reason that he did this is, he said, I'm, like, tired of VC content, venture capital content. Like all these people in this world, these CEO', all these investors, they feel compelled, I think, for some interesting reasons, to have a public Persona and to, like, speak about themselves and what they're doing, because they feel as though it's important for the public to get to know them to. Or at least other business people to get to know them, to understand whether or not they should give them more money, essentially. So he says that he thinks this is just a more fun way, more interesting way to get to know all of these folks. So I think for them there's like a business purpose. So aside from just humanizing them, I think there's also this idea that, like, I need to be out in public. But there's also this weird, interesting thing that's happened. A friend of mine is in the business world, and he told me that it's just a kind of an accepted truism almost that if you want to start a business, you need to become an influencer. It's not enough that your company might just make lots of money or be good at doing whatever it is that your company does. You need to have this big, grandiose personality. All these people are very actively trying to establish themselves and maintain their status as influencers, the same way that, like, people like Addison Rae maintain their public Persona on TikTok.

[Karen Howe]

This show is an example of a broader trend that's happening. It's not the only show that has come out. Tech companies and tech billionaires have really entered the media and entertainment landscape in full force. They are acquiring media companies. They are starting their own podcast. And this is now. Now they've spun up an entire reality TV show that is trending even more in that direction. And to me, it's actually, you know, even though Solana is saying that they are ultimately trying to target. It sounds like he's saying they're trying to target other people within the tech industry. I don't actually think that's what's going on. I think they are actually trying to target the public, as Nikki mentioned, where they are trying to project a brand to average consumers to convince them of continuing to buy into the premise of Silicon Valley. And so, and. And, you know, sometimes they're very explicit about this. Like when OpenAI acquired Technology Brothers, which was this daily talk show podcast between these two actual brothers.

[Thomas Germain]

It's called tbpn now right now called tppn.

[Karen Howe]

OpenAI explicitly said that they wanted this acquisition to help start constructive, quote, unquote, constructive conversations about AI like they were. They were very open about their intention of using this as a way to shape the public narrative. But I, I think even with this mafia reality TV game where they're not being as express explicit, it's still part of that broader attempt to continue massaging the narrative. And I think this is because of a recognition from people within Silicon Valley that narrative is a huge lever of influence for them. And as they are losing control of the narrative, they lose control of a significant part of their power.

[Thomas Germain]

There's clearly a sentiment among the tech business class that going through the traditional media is not the way to do it. I mean, you even hear it explicitly from guys like Mark Andreessen. You should just be posting on social media. You should start your own podcast. You don't need the media anymore. And this is clearly like you're saying part of that trend to take back control by like, instead of talking to a journalist, why don't I just do the news myself?

[Karen Howe]

Yeah. I hear so many founders and people who aspire to be founders talk all the time about how the most important skill that they need as a founder is storytelling.

[Nikki Wolfe]

I don't know, Tom. I don't know that we've convinced you that this is your next watch. Karen, are you going to keep watching?

[Thomas Germain]

No, I think I said I'm going to jump out this window right here. There's lots of things I can think of that I'd rather do than I

[Karen Howe]

have to say I will probably watch episode two. I want us to continue observing the behavior of these. These people.

[Nikki Wolfe]

I'm gonna keep watching. We'll maybe have some, maybe have some updates for you next week.

[Thomas Germain]

I've got some papers to watch dry personally, but.

[Nikki Wolfe]

Thank you so much for listening to the show. I hope you enjoyed it. Join us next week. If you're in the uk, you can listen on BBC Sounds. And if you're outside the uk, you can listen wherever you get your podcasts or search for the Interface Podcast on YouTube if you want to get in touch with us. Unfortunately, the BBC does not have an aviary, so do not send a carrier pigeon. But you can email us@the interfacebc.com or you can find us all on social media. The links are in the show notes.

[Karen Howe]

Hi, everyone.

[Zara McDonald]

It's Sara McDonald and Michelle Andrews here.

[Thomas Germain]

Hi.

[Michelle Andrews]

That's Michelle Andrews and that's Zara McDonald.

[Zara McDonald]

We're from the Shameless podcast, the pop culture podcast for smart people who love dumb stuff.

[Karen Howe]

Yeah.

[Michelle Andrews]

On Mondays we cover pop culture analysis. Think Netflix's Lamar Odom documentary, the Great unfollowing of Pregnant Women and the tangled web of celebrity GoFundMes on Thursdays. Zaz, what do we do?

[Zara McDonald]

It's what we call the quick and dirty. So it's a recap of the biggest pop culture headlines that week. Whatever you need an explainer on, we have got your you. And then on Fridays, we do dumb stuff Fridays. Yes. We're three times weekly.

[Michelle Andrews]

Three times weekly. Search for Shameless in your favorite podcast app now.